DOCSLIB.ORG

Valles Caldera National Preserve Foundation Document Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Valles Caldera National Preserve Foundation Document Overview NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Valles Caldera National Preserve New Mexico Contact Information For more information about the Valles Caldera National Preserve Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or (575) 829-4100 or write to: Superintendent, Valles Caldera National Preserve, PO Box 359, Jemez Springs, NM 87025 Purpose Significance Significance statements express why Valles Caldera National Preserve resources and values are important enough to merit national park unit designation. Statements of significance describe why an area is important within a global, national, regional, and systemwide context. These statements are linked to the purpose of the park unit, and are supported by data, research, and consensus. Significance statements describe the distinctive nature of the park and inform management decisions, focusing efforts on preserving and protecting the most important resources and values of the park unit. • Valles Caldera possesses exceptional value in illustrating and interpreting massive explosive volcanic eruptions, caldera formation, and the functioning of active geothermal systems. Valles Caldera is one of the world’s best examples of an intact volcanic caldera and is considered the worldwide “type locality” for caldera resurgence. Located in the Jemez Mountains of • Valles Caldera is a place where one can directly experience north-central New Mexico, VALLES pre-agricultural heritage and reflect on inconspicuous CALDERA NATIONAL PRESERVE protects, cultural landscapes where hunting and gathering were preserves, and restores ecosystems practiced successfully for more than 10,000 years. Past and cultural landscapes within an peoples across the continent were drawn to Valles outstanding example of a volcanic Caldera to utilize its rich geologic deposits of high quality caldera for the purpose of education, obsidian for tools and weapons, making this location one of the most significant cultural obsidian sources in North scientific research, public enjoyment and America. To this day, the caldera is used by local pueblo and use, and cultural continuity. tribal peoples and is cherished by more than two dozen American Indian groups. © Roger Blake arrowheads enlarged to show detail Significance Fundamental Resources and Values Fundamental resources and values are those features, systems, processes, experiences, stories, scenes, sounds, smells, or other attributes determined to merit primary consideration during planning and management processes because they are essential to achieving the purpose of the park and maintaining its significance. • The Caldera • Valle Grande and Volcanic Vistas • Traditional Cultural Landscapes and Tribal • The land use history of Valles Caldera encapsulates the Connections story of early Spanish and Mexican settlement across the present-day American Southwest and the socio-political • Prehistoric and Historic Legacy shifts that occurred when the territory was annexed by the United States at the end of the Mexican-American War • High Elevation Ecosystem in 1848. Previously known as Baca Location No. 1, Valles • A Landscape in Recovery Caldera exemplifies the legacy of how the establishment, utilization, and changing ownership of Spanish and Mexican land grants transformed the Southwest. Valles Caldera National Preserve contains other resources and values that may not be fundamental to the purpose and • Valles Caldera’s unusual setting—high elevation, caldera significance of the park, but are important to consider in topography, unfragmented habitats, and key hydrologic management and planning decisions. These are referred to as role at the top of the watershed—presents a dynamic other important resources and values. learning landscape for the scientific study and restoration of ecosystem processes that are recovering from three • Scientific Knowledge and Education centuries of human disturbances and challenged by contemporary and future climate change. • History Grove • Valles Caldera’s distinct topographic mosaic of expansive valley meadows, lush forested volcanic domes, meandering valley streams, and old growth Ponderosa pine groves are in striking contrast to the arid New Mexico landscapes at lower elevations. With caldera vistas from rim to rim, elk and other wildlife viewing, dark night skies, winter skiing, excellent hunting and fishing opportunities, and backcountry solitude, the landscape provides extraordinary year-round recreational opportunities and visitor experiences. • Valles Caldera National Preserve was first established in 2000 as an unprecedented national experiment in public land management through which the U.S. Congress sought to evaluate the efficiency, economy, and effectiveness of decentralized public land management. The 15-year experiment continues to contribute to the national dialogue on the role of protected areas for long-term economic and environmental sustainability and innovative approaches to place-based and science-based adaptive management. Description Valles Caldera is located in the center and at the top of For thousands of years American Indians have used the caldera the Jemez Mountains in north-central New Mexico. for hunting, fishing, and gathering various plants for food, The 88,900-acre preserve encompasses almost all of medicine, and ceremonies. The signature resource for these the volcanic caldera created by a spectacular volcanic indigenous peoples was obsidian, and tools found across the eruption about 1.25 million years ago. The caldera is United States were made from obsidian gathered here. Numerous dormant, but not extinct, and still displays signs of American Indian tribes and pueblos in the region have deep volcanic life with hot springs and boiling sulphuric acid historic and cultural connections to the caldera. Valles Caldera fumaroles. The juxtaposition of large grassland meadows, also chronicles the history of New Mexico’s enchantment and or valles in Spanish, surrounded by rounded forest- exploitation—from 19th century land use after the Treaty of covered volcanic domes provides the distinctive natural Guadalupe Hidalgo and sheep grazing under the partido system landscape that led to the name of Valles Caldera. These to subsequent cattle grazing, timber harvesting, and geothermal ecosystems, ranging from 8,000 to 11,254 feet high at the exploration. The preserve offers a landscape in which to explore top of Redondo Peak, combine abundant rainfall, mixed- the dynamics of high-elevation ecosystem stability and resilience conifer forests, and deep rich soils to support a great in the context of changing climate conditions. Today’s approach diversity of animals, plants, fungi, and other organisms to ecological restoration builds on the lessons learned from this including several thousand elk and healthy populations of history and seeks to regain balance between human uses and mountain lions, bears, and coyotes. natural processes. The preserve is an ecosystem in recovery. Chicoma Mountain 11561ft eek 3524m Cr a llin s Ga o 10380ft di In 3164m s lo Cerro Toledo E L A O D G A R 10930ft R R I T A e E d C 3331m o t i R SANTA CLARA INDIAN RESERVATION Sa S n V A ant L L E a ek Cre S A N Clara A An N T O N I O to Cr nio eek V A L L E T O L E D O San An to Caballo Mountain C n 10496ft CERRO E io k Cerro San Luis R C 3199m E e SANTA ROSA R R e 9510ft C R r 2899m O re O C Cerro Seco S e S k 9931ft o D D i 3026m E n 9701ft E o L t San Antonio 2957m n L A Mountain O A 9986ft S B 3044m n R a P S I k O e G e S VALLE r O C O S SECO 10332ft FOREST NATIONAL 3149m k e re VALLES CALDERA C SANTA FE SANTA s i u VALLE L DE LOS POSOS A NATIONAL PRESERVE r L A N u M O O k h C A N Y ree p C SANTA FE SANTA l Su n V A I L L O a L L E J A R A M S lo il am C E R R O D E L M E D I O R Jar NATIONAL FOREST NATIONAL E D R O B 9848ft O 3002m D Cerro N O Piñon D 8745ft E k 2665m R e L re O C S Redondito Ja Pajarito 105 ra A o 10898ft m Mountain LA d 3322m il M n lo O 10441ft S 126 o R I N C O N D E d C 3182m C e r A e NY R LOS SOLDADOS ON e Redondo Peak k 11254ft History 3430m L Grove Cerro Grande To Los Alamos a and Manhattan Project VALLE GRANDE 10199ft National Historical Park J 3109m a r Cabin a District Redondo Visitor Contact Station Cr eek Valle Grande Entrance Station 501 er iv R 4 Cerro la Jara z me 4 8745ft Je 2665m rk BANCO BONITO Fo BANDELIER South Mountain Rabbit NATIONAL EL CAJETE 9795ft Mountain 2986m 9938ft MONUMENT t 3029m 4 O s Preserve G Ea Ponderosa I E Entrance D Group Campground (reservation required) N A To White Rock, S East er Bandelier National Monument, iv F and Sante Fe E R Jemez Falls or D k Jemez N River O z SANTA FE NATIONAL FOREST Ñ e A m R e i C to J s d le e los Frijo To 25 and Albuquerque North 0 1 2 Kilometers 0 1 2 Miles Los Griegos Restrooms Campground Ranger station Unpaved road Trail 10117ft 3084m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Passive Monitoring of Ambient Reactive Gaseous Mercury in The
    Passive Monitoring of Ambient Reactive Gaseous Mercury ihFin the Four Corners Area, Eastern OklhOklahoma, an d Central/East Texas: Important Method Evaluation and Baseline Work Presented at the National Air Toxics Monitoring and Data Analysis Workshop, Dallas, Texas, April 7, 2011. • Mark Sather, U.S. EPA Region 6, Air Quality Analysis Section • (214) 665-8353, [email protected] 1 Introduction • This presentation will summarize the first year of a two year monitoring project estimating reactive gaseous mercury (RGM, a.k.a. gaseous oxidized mercury, GOM) dry deposition in the Four Corners area and eastern Oklahoma, and preview a similar study to be done in Texas. • RGM of interest because of its chemical reactivity/water solubility; RGM readily deposits to water , soils and vegetation by both dry and wet processes; atmospheric lifetime = 0.5-2 days versus 0.5-2 years for elemental mercury which is mildly reactive and sparingly soluble in water. • Four Corners/Eastern Oklahoma project is a two year effort funded by U.S. EPA ORD Regional Applied Research Effort (RARE) program; the upcoming Texas study will also be funded by RARE . • Project Collaborators: U.S. EPA Region 6, U.S. EPA ORD, Frontier Geosci/lbliiences/Global Sciences, Ali on, NMED, NPS, USFS/ BLM, Jemez Pueblo/Valles Caldera Trust, Cherokee Nation. • Ambient monitoring began in August, 2009, and will run through the first part of August, 2011. 2 Project Objectives • To gather first-time RGM dry deposition estimates for 24 consecutive months at six sites in the Four Corners area to set a valuable ambient RGM dry deposition estimate baseline with proper assessment of: (a) the effectiveness of the Frontier Atmospheric Dry Deposition (FADD) surrogate surface devices in providing reliable RGM dry deposition estimates and (b) the inter-annual RGM dry deposition estimate variability.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Nomenclature of ' Volcanic Rocks in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico
    -» Stratigraphic Nomenclature of ' Volcanic Rocks in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico By R. A. BAILEY, R. L. SMITH, and C. S. ROSS CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY » GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1274-P New Stratigraphic names and revisions in nomenclature of upper Tertiary and , Quaternary volcanic rocks in the Jemez Mountains UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1969 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 15 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract.._..._________-...______.._-.._._____.. PI Introduction. -_-________.._.____-_------___-_______------_-_---_-_ 1 General relations._____-___________--_--___-__--_-___-----___---__. 2 Keres Group..__________________--------_-___-_------------_------ 2 Canovas Canyon Rhyolite..__-__-_---_________---___-____-_--__ 5 Paliza Canyon Formation.___-_________-__-_-__-__-_-_______--- 6 Bearhead Rhyolite-___________________________________________ 8 Cochiti Formation.._______________________________________________ 8 Polvadera Group..______________-__-_------________--_-______---__ 10 Lobato Basalt______________________________________________ 10 Tschicoma Formation_______-__-_-____---_-__-______-______-- 11 El Rechuelos Rhyolite--_____---------_--------------_-_------- 11 Puye Formation_________________------___________-_--______-.__- 12 Tewa Group__._...._.______........___._.___.____......___...__ 12 Bandelier Tuff.______________.______________... 13 Tsankawi Pumice Bed._____________________________________ 14 Valles Rhyolite______.__-___---_____________.________..__ 15 Deer Canyon Member.______-_____-__.____--_--___-__-____ 15 Redondo Creek Member.__________________________________ 15 Valle Grande Member____-__-_--___-___--_-____-___-._-.__ 16 Battleship Rock Member...______________________________ 17 El Cajete Member____..._____________________ 17 Banco Bonito Member.___-_--_---_-_----_---_----._____--- 18 References .
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Hydrology of Valles Caldera and the Southwestern Jemez Mountains, New Mexico
    GEOTHERMAL HYDROLOGY OF VALLES CALDERA AND THE SOUTHWESTERN JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4067 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GEOTHERMAL HYDROLOGY OF VALLES CALDERA AND THE SOUTHWESTERN JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO By Frank W. Trainer, Robert J. Rogers, and Michael L. Sorey U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4067 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Albuquerque, New Mexico 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286 5338 Montgomery NE, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Albuquerque, NM 87109-1311 Information regarding research and data-collection programs of the U.S. Geological Survey is available on the Internet via the World Wide Web. You may connect to the Home Page for the New Mexico District Office using the URL: http://nm.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................ 2 Purpose and scope........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Vegetation Map of the Valles Caldera National Preserve, New
    ______________________________________________________________________________ A Vegetation Map of the Valles Caldera National Preserve, New Mexico ______________________________________________________________________________ A Vegetation Map of Valles Caldera National Preserve, New Mexico 1 Esteban Muldavin, Paul Neville, Charlie Jackson, and Teri Neville2 2006 ______________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY To support the management and sustainability of the ecosystems of the Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP), a map of current vegetation was developed. The map was based on aerial photography from 2000 and Landsat satellite imagery from 1999 and 2001, and was designed to serve natural resources management planning activities at an operational scale of 1:24,000. There are 20 map units distributed among forest, shrubland, grassland, and wetland ecosystems. Each map unit is defined in terms of a vegetation classification that was developed for the preserve based on 348 ground plots. An annotated legend is provided with details of vegetation composition, environment, and distribution of each unit in the preserve. Map sheets at 1:32,000 scale were produced, and a stand-alone geographic information system was constructed to house the digital version of the map. In addition, all supporting field data was compiled into a relational database for use by preserve managers. Cerro La Jarra in Valle Grande of the Valles Caldera National Preserve (Photo: E. Muldavin) 1 Final report submitted in April 4, 2006 in partial fulfillment of National Prak Service Award No. 1443-CA-1248- 01-001 and Valles Caldrea Trust Contract No. VCT-TO 0401. 2 Esteban Muldavin (Senior Ecologist), Charlie Jackson (Mapping Specialist), and Teri Neville (GIS Specialist) are with Natural Heritage New Mexico of the Museum of Southwestern Biology at the University of New Mexico (UNM); Paul Neville is with the Earth Data Analysis Center (EDAC) at UNM.
    [Show full text]
  • Bailey-1976.Pdf
    VOL. 81, NO. 5 JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH FEBRUARY 10, 1976 Volcanism, Structure,and Geochronologyof Long Valley Caldera, Mono County, California RoY A. BAILEY U.S. GeologicalSurvey, Reston, Virginia 22092 G. BRENT DALRYMPLE AND MARVIN A. LANPHERE U.S. GeologicalSurvey, Menlo Park, California 94025 Long Valley caldera, a 17- by 32-km elliptical depressionon the east front of the Sierra Nevada, formed 0.7 m.y. ago during eruption of the Bishoptuff. Subsequentintracaldera volcanism included eruption of (1) aphyric rhyolite 0.68-0.64 m.y. ago during resurgentdoming of the caldera floor, (2) porphyritic hornblende-biotiterhyolite from centersperipheral to the resurgentdome at 0.5, 0.3, and 0.1 m.y. ago, and (3) porphyritic hornblende-biotiterhyodacite from outer ring fractures0.2 m.y. ago to 50,000 yr ago, a sequencethat apparently records progressivecrystallization of a subjacentchemically zoned magma chamber. Holocene rhyolitic and phreatic eruptions suggestthat residual magma was present in the chamber as recentlyas 450 yr ago. Intracaldera hydrothermalactivity beganat least0.3 m.y. ago and was widespreadin the caldera moat; it has sincedeclined due to self-sealingof near-surfacecaldera sediments by zeolitization, argillization, and silicificationand has becomelocalized on recentlyreactivated north- west-trendingSierra Nevada frontal faults that tap hot water at depth. INTRODUCTION concentrates were treated with a dilute HF solution to remove small bits of attached glassand fragments of other mineral In the westernUnited States,only three calderasare known grains. Obsidian used for dating was totally unhydrated and to be large enoughand young enoughto possiblystill contain not devitrified. Small blocks sawed from many of the hand residual magma in their chambers:the Vailes caldera (•1.1 specimenswere used for dating.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History
    Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 8 Scenic Trips to the Geologic Past Series: No. 1—SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO No. 2—TAOS—RED RIVER—EAGLE NEST, NEW MEXICO, CIRCLE DRIVE No. 3—ROSWELL—CAPITAN—RUIDOSO AND BOTTOMLESS LAKES STATE PARK, NEW MEXICO No. 4—SOUTHERN ZUNI MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO No. 5—SILVER CITY—SANTA RITA—HURLEY, NEW MEXICO No. 6—TRAIL GUIDE TO THE UPPER PECOS, NEW MEXICO No. 7—HIGH PLAINS NORTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO, RATON- CAPULIN MOUNTAIN—CLAYTON No. 8—MOSlAC OF NEW MEXICO'S SCENERY, ROCKS, AND HISTORY No. 9—ALBUQUERQUE—ITS MOUNTAINS, VALLEYS, WATER, AND VOLCANOES No. 10—SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO No. 11—CUMBRE,S AND TOLTEC SCENIC RAILROAD C O V E R : REDONDO PEAK, FROM JEMEZ CANYON (Forest Service, U.S.D.A., by John Whiteside) Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History (Forest Service, U.S.D.A., by Robert W . Talbott) WHITEWATER CANYON NEAR GLENWOOD SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 8 Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, a n d History edited by PAIGE W. CHRISTIANSEN and FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES 1972 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY STIRLING A. COLGATE, President NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES & MINERAL RESOURCES FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI, Director BOARD OF REGENTS Ex Officio Bruce King, Governor of New Mexico Leonard DeLayo, Superintendent of Public Instruction Appointed William G. Abbott, President, 1961-1979, Hobbs George A. Cowan, 1972-1975, Los Alamos Dave Rice, 1972-1977, Carlsbad Steve Torres, 1967-1979, Socorro James R.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire History in the Taos Valley Watersheds, New Mexico, USA
    fire Article Surface Fire to Crown Fire: Fire History in the Taos Valley Watersheds, New Mexico, USA Lane B. Johnson 1 and Ellis Q. Margolis 2,* 1 University of Minnesota, Cloquet Forestry Center, 175 University Drive, Cloquet, MN 55720, USA; [email protected] 2 U. S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, New Mexico Landscapes Field Station, 301 Dinosaur Trail, Santa Fe, NM 87508, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-505-954-2251 Received: 9 February 2019; Accepted: 8 March 2019; Published: 14 March 2019 Abstract: Tree-ring fire scars, tree ages, historical photographs, and historical surveys indicate that, for centuries, fire played different ecological roles across gradients of elevation, forest, and fire regimes in the Taos Valley Watersheds. Historical fire regimes collapsed across the three watersheds by 1899, leaving all sites without fire for at least 119 years. Historical photographs and quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) ages indicate that a high-severity fire historically burned at multiple high-elevation subalpine plots in today’s Village of Taos Ski Valley, with large high-severity patches (>640 ha). Low-severity, frequent (9–29-year median interval) surface fires burned on the south aspects in nearby lower elevation dry conifer forests in all watersheds. Fires were associated with drought during the fire year. Widespread fires commonly burned synchronously in multiple watersheds during more severe drought years, preceded by wet years, including fire in all three watersheds in 1664, 1715, and 1842. In contrast, recent local “large” wildfires have only burned within single watersheds and may not be considered large in a historical context.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Volcanoes, Based on Recent Seismic Activity; There Are Over 200 Geological Young Volcanic Centres
    Volcanoes of Canada 1 V4 C.J. Hickson and M. Ulmi, Jan. 3, 2006 • Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics Where do volcanoes occur? Driving forces • Volcano chemistry and eruption types • Volcanic Hazards Pyroclastic flows and surges Lava flows Ash fall (tephra) Lahars/Debris Flows Debris Avalanches Volcanic Gases • Anatomy of an Eruption – Mt. St. Helens • Volcanoes of Canada Stikine volcanic belt Presentation Outline Anahim volcanic belt Wells Gray – Clearwater volcanic field 2 Garibaldi volcanic belt • USA volcanoes – Cascade Magmatic Arc V4 Volcanoes in Our Backyard Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics In Canada, British Columbia and Yukon are the host to a vast wealth of volcanic 3 landforms. V4 How many active volcanoes are there on Earth? • Erupting now about 20 • Each year 50-70 • Each decade about 160 • Historical eruptions about 550 Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics • Holocene eruptions (last 10,000 years) about 1500 Although none of Canada’s volcanoes are erupting now, they have been active as recently as a couple of 4 hundred years ago. V4 The Earth’s Beginning Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 5 V4 The Earth’s Beginning These global forces have created, mountain Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics ranges, continents and oceans. 6 V4 continental crust ic ocean crust mantle Where do volcanoes occur? Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 7 V4 Driving Forces: Moving Plates Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 8 V4 Driving Forces: Subduction Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 9 V4 Driving Forces: Hot Spots Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 10 V4 Driving Forces: Rifting Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics Ocean plates moving apart create new crust.
    [Show full text]
  • July 13, 2015 Cons: # 02ENNM00
    New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office 2105 Osuna NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113 Phone: (505) 346-2525 Fax: (505) 346-2542 July 13, 2015 Cons: # 02ENNM00-2014-F-0266 Maria T. Garcia, Forest Supervisor Santa Fe National Forest 11 Forest Lane Santa Fe, New Mexico 87508 Dear Ms. Garcia: Thank you for your request for formal consultation and conferencing with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.), as amended (Act). We began early coordination with you and received a Biological Assessment (BA) (dated June 6, 2014) and supplemental information, which evaluate the impacts of the Southwest Jemez Mountains Restoration Project Santa Fe National Forest Jemez Ranger District Sandoval County, New Mexico (Restoration Project). At issue are potential impacts from the proposed action on the Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) (MSO) and its critical habitat, the Jemez Mountains salamander (Plethodon neomexicanus) (salamander) and its critical habitat, the New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus) and its proposed critical habitat, and the Rio Grande Cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis) (cutthroat trout). You determined that the proposed action “may affect, is likely to adversely affect” the MSO and its designated critical habitat, the salamander and its designated critical habitat, the jumping mouse and its proposed critical habitat. This biological opinion does not rely on the regulatory definition of “destruction or adverse modification” of critical habitat at 50 CFR 402.02. Instead, we have relied upon the statute and the August 6, 2004, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Gifford Pinchot Task Force v.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Northern Jemez Mountains, North-Central New Mexico Kirt A
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/58 Geology of the northern Jemez Mountains, north-central New Mexico Kirt A. Kempter, Shari A. Kelley, and John R. Lawrence, 2007, pp. 155-168 in: Geology of the Jemez Region II, Kues, Barry S., Kelley, Shari A., Lueth, Virgil W.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 58th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 499 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2007 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico Forest and Watershed Restoration Institute Annual Report 2013-2014
    New Mexico Forest and Watershed Restoration Institute Annual Report 2013-2014 The New Mexico Forest and Watershed Restoration Institute (FWRI) exists to promote practices that reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire and enhance ecosystem function. We have pursued this through four program areas: the biology of restoration treatments, or which tree to cut and which to leave, with an emphasis on the need to burn treated areas; the mechanics of treatments, or how to operate safely and efficiently, a program area that was most active 2008-2010 but currently is dormant; support from geographic information systems (GIS) to field work by FWRI and our partners, which usually involves maps; and monitoring, or how to determine if treatments are effective, and is the subject which accounts for most of our partner’s requests for technical assistance. This report is organized into three broad areas: technical assistance and monitoring, restoration- based economic development, and watershed restoration partnerships. These areas are further subivided as needed. This report focuses on the period 1 October 2013 through 30 September 2014, with activities outside of that period mentioned as needed for context. This period was one of transition for FWRI. First, the previous Director, Andy Egan, left in May 2013 to become Dean of Science at a university in Canada, and the FWRI forester stepped in as Interim Director. Second, an employee resigned unexpectedly at the end of September 2013. We took this opportunity to restructure two positions as program directors for restoration monitoring and for collaboration. These positions were advertised in July 2014. In addition, our Administrative Associate missed six months due to a serious illness.
    [Show full text]
  • Campi Flegrei Caldera, Somma–Vesuvius Volcano, and Ischia Island) from 20 Years of Continuous GPS Observations (2000–2019)
    remote sensing Technical Note The Ground Deformation History of the Neapolitan Volcanic Area (Campi Flegrei Caldera, Somma–Vesuvius Volcano, and Ischia Island) from 20 Years of Continuous GPS Observations (2000–2019) Prospero De Martino 1,2,* , Mario Dolce 1, Giuseppe Brandi 1, Giovanni Scarpato 1 and Umberto Tammaro 1 1 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Napoli Osservatorio Vesuviano, via Diocleziano 328, 80124 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] (M.D.); [email protected] (G.B.); [email protected] (G.S.); [email protected] (U.T.) 2 Istituto per il Rilevamento Elettromagnetico dell’Ambiente, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, via Diocleziano 328, 80124 Napoli, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Neapolitan volcanic area includes three active and high-risk volcanoes: Campi Flegrei caldera, Somma–Vesuvius, and Ischia island. The Campi Flegrei volcanic area is a typical exam- ple of a resurgent caldera, characterized by intense uplift periods followed by subsidence phases (bradyseism). After about 21 years of subsidence following the 1982–1984 unrest, a new inflation period started in 2005 and, with increasing rates over time, is ongoing. The overall uplift from 2005 to December 2019 is about 65 cm. This paper provides the history of the recent Campi Flegrei caldera Citation: De Martino, P.; Dolce, M.; unrest and an overview of the ground deformation patterns of the Somma–Vesuvius and Ischia vol- Brandi, G.; Scarpato, G.; Tammaro, U. canoes from continuous GPS observations. In the 2000–2019 time span, the GPS time series allowed The Ground Deformation History of the continuous and accurate tracking of ground and seafloor deformation of the whole volcanic area.
    [Show full text]