DOCSLIB.ORG

May 2011) Commentary Report (Revised Edition September 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
May 2011) Commentary Report (Revised Edition September 2012 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Revised Edition-September 2012 Kent Minerals And Waste Development Framework Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Options Consultation (May 2011) Commentary Report (Revised edition September 2012) The full responses for the Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Consultation can be found at: http://consult.kent.gov.uk/portal/waste-dpd/waste-options?tab=list 1 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Revised Edition-September 2012 This revised edition of the commentary report includes some minor changes to address concerns raised by the Kent Downs AONB unit. Produced by : Planning and Environment Environment and Enterprise Kent County Council Invicta House Tel: 01622 221610 County Hall Email: [email protected] Maidstone Web: www.kent.gov.uk/mwdf Kent ME14 1XX The full responses for the Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Consultation can be found at: http://consult.kent.gov.uk/portal/waste-dpd/waste-options?tab=list 2 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Revised Edition-September 2012 Contents Page 1 Abbreviations 4 2 Introduction 5 3 Site Proposals 7 4 Responses for Mineral Sites DPD 9 5 Soft Sand Sites for Consideration 11 6 Sharp Sand and Gravel Sites for Consideration 33 7 Crushed Rock Sites for Consideration 53 8 Silica Sand Sites for Consideration 57 9 Chalk Sites for Consideration 61 10 Brickearth Sites for Consideration 67 11 Clay Sites for Consideration 71 12 Mineral Import Sites for Consideration 73 13 Secondary & Recycled Aggregates Sites for Consideration 75 14 Glossary 101 The full responses for the Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Consultation can be found at: http://consult.kent.gov.uk/portal/waste-dpd/waste-options?tab=list 3 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Revised Edition-September 2012 Abbreviations AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty MGB Metropolitan Green Belt AQMA Air Quality Management Area MOD Ministry of Defence BAP Biodiversity Action Plan NNR National Nature Reserve BOA Biodiversity Opportunity Area PINS Planning Inspectorate CPRE Campaign to Protect Rural England PPS Planning Policy Statement DPD Development Plan Documents PROW Public Right of Way SA Sustainability Appraisal EIA Environmental Impact Assessment SAC Special Area of Conserva- HER Historic Environment Record tion HGV Heavy Goods Vehicle SLA Special Landscaped Area HRA Habitats Regulation Assessment SNCI Site of Nature Conserva- tion KCC Kent County Council SPA Special Protection Area KHS Kent Highway Services SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest KWT Kent Wildlife Trust SWS Southern Water Site LDF Local Development Framework TMBC Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council LWS Local Wildlife Site The full responses for the Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Consultation can be found at: http://consult.kent.gov.uk/portal/waste-dpd/waste-options?tab=list 4 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Revised Edition-September 2012 2.0 Introduction 2.1 The Mineral Sites Development Plan Document (Options Stage) 2.5 As well as the online comments the Council also received a num- Commentary Report is the follow up document to the consultation for ber of petitions; the Mineral Sites Development Plan Document. The consultation pe- riod ran from the 31st of May 2011 to the 26th of July, however there Petition Amount of Signatures was a 2 week extension until the 9th of August. Charing-Sites 201 10,16,62,69,74,77,85,86 and 87 Lenham- Sites 75 and 76 77 2.2 This document collates and summarises the responses for each of the sites to show the main reasons for support , objection or com- Hollowshore and Ham Farm- 616 menting from organisations and members of the public. The aim of Sites 25 and 26 this report is to create a clear and concise document showing the main issues put forward. If people wish to read full responses they Lydd Quarry- Site 73 (ongoing e- 21 may access them through the online consultation portal at; http:// petition) consult.kent.gov.uk/portal. This brought the total number of responses up to 2620. 2.3 Those responses put forward will be recorded as part of the site assessment. Data collection and site visit reports will then be formu- 2.6 The Council has received detailed reports on sites from the resi- lated, taking into consideration the emerging Minerals and Waste dents of Lenham, Badgers Mount and Shoreham Parish Council. Core Strategy policies and changes to national planning policy. The Preferred Options are due to be published and consulted upon in Reports were given to Minerals and Waste Development Framework May 2012. (MWDF) team outside of the consultation but the comments from these internal consultees are considered to be important in informing 2.4 The Mineral Sites ‘options’ consultation received the following the site selection process and so have been summarised for this re responses; port. Total Number of Responses 1705 Objection 1452 Comment 219 Support 34 The full responses for the Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Consultation can be found at: http://consult.kent.gov.uk/portal/waste-dpd/waste-options?tab=list 5 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Revised Edition-September 2012 2.7 Sites with the most responses/objections; 2.9 There were some recurring concerns which applied to many of the sites. These comments included; Site Refer- Name ence Number •The suitability of roads 10 Pluckley Road, Charing •Damage to homes, both structurally and in terms of value 62 Newlands Farm, CharinCharingg 69 Burleigh Farm, Charing •Sites that are in or near to designated land 74 Charing Quarry •Public safety 75 Boltons Field, Lenham •Impact on biodiversity 76 Chapel Farm, Lenham 77 Burleigh Farm & Tile Lodge, Charing 2.10 Space is restricted in this report. All comments are valued and 5 Filston Lane will be taken into consideration in the site assessment process. Full 25 Ham Farm (Withdrawn) responses can be accessed via the online consultation portal; 26 Hollowshore http://consult.kent.gov.uk. 73 Lydd Quarry 7 Hermitage Quarry Westerly Extension 2.11 The graphs found in this report represent the number of re- 8 Chelsfield Ammunition Depot sponses for each site. The internal responses we received from 12 Newington Industrial Estate heritage, biodiversity and highways as well as Southern Water are 86 Charing Quarry (waste 2) not included in this data. 2.8 The other mineral sites had responses from within KCC or outside organisations but had fewer or no comments from members of the public. The full responses for the Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Consultation can be found at: http://consult.kent.gov.uk/portal/waste-dpd/waste-options?tab=list 6 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Revised Edition-September 2012 3 Site Proposals 3.3 Sharp Sand and Gravel Sites for Consideration 3.1 The following is a list of all sites submitted for consideration for minerals uses. The list contains their site reference number and the 2 Beltring Green Farm 33 relevant page in this document. 3.2 Soft Sand Sites for Consideration 3 Arnolds Lodge Farm 35 West 4 Woodfalls Farm 37 5 Filston Lane 39 Site Reference Num- Name Page Number ber 17 Moat Farm 41 6 Land Adjacent to Platt 11 Industrial Estate 25 Ham Farm 43 9 Celcon Works 13 26 Hollowshore 45 10 Pluckley Road, Charing 15 49 Land North and South 47 of Hammer Dyke 24 Land North of Addington 17 Lane 71 Stonecastle Farm 49 Quarry 62 Newlands Farm, Char- 19 ing 73 Lydd Quarry 51 69 Burleigh Farm, Charing 21 3.4 Crushed Rock Sites for Consideration 74 Charing Quarry 23 75 Boltons Field, Lenham 25 7 Hermitage Quarry West- 53 erly Extension 76 Chapel Farm, Lenham 27 78 Richborough Mine 55 77 Burleigh Farm & Tile 29 Lodge, Charing 97 Shrine Farm 31 The full responses for the Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Consultation can be found at: http://consult.kent.gov.uk/portal/waste-dpd/waste-options?tab=list 7 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Revised Edition-September 2012 3.5 Silica Sand Sites for Consideration 3.9 Mineral Importation sites for Consideration Site Reference Num- Name Page Number 1 East Peckham Rail De- 73 ber pot 24 Land North of Addington 57 Lane 3.10 Secondary & Recycled Aggregate 62 Newlands Farm, Char- 59 ing 8 Chelsfield Ammunition 75 Depot 3.6 Chalk Sites for Consideration 12 Newington Industrial 77 Estate 16 Beacon Hill Quarry 61 21 FM Conway, Rochester 79 Way 56 Hegdale Quarry 63 45 Dunbrik Depot 81 63 Pinden Quarry 65 52 Weatherlees 83 56 Hegdale Quarry 85 3.7 Brickearth Sites for Consideration 65 Land North of Stevens 87 Carlotti 19 Paradise Farm 67 72 Unit 14 Canterbury In- 89 dustrial Park 92 Land at Bax Farm 69 79 Tilmanstone 91 80 Faversham Quarry 93 3.8 Clay Sites for Consideration 81 Milton Manor Farm 95 86 Charing Quarry 97 60 Norwood Quarry & 71 (waste2) Landfill Extension 91 Animal Products Site 99 The full responses for the Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Consultation can be found at: http://consult.kent.gov.uk/portal/waste-dpd/waste-options?tab=list 8 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Revised Edition-September 2012 4.0 Mineral Sites Development Plan Document support 0 Responses regarding the complete Mineral Sites Develop- comment 17 Responses ment Plan Document object 15 0 5 10 15 20 Responses Port of London Authority None of the sites set out in the options consultation document are located in close proximity to the River Thames and therefore the PLA has no comments to make on the individual sites.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Swale’S Coast
    The Kent Coast Coastal Access Report This document is part of a larger document produced by Kent Area of the Ramblers’ Association and should not be read or interpreted except as part of that larger document. In particular every part of the document should be read in conjunction with the notes in the Introduction. In no circumstances may any part of this document be downloaded or distributed without all the other parts. Swale’s Coast 4.4 Swale’s Coast 4.4.1 Description 4.4.1.1 Sw ale’s coast starts at TQ828671 at Otterham Quay. It extends for 115 km to TR056650 on Graveney Marshes to the w est of The Sportsman pub. It takes in the Isle of Sheppey w hich is connected to the mainland by tw o bridges at Sw ale. It is the longest coastline in Kent. 4.4.1.2 Approximately 55 km is on PRoWs, 27 km is de facto access (though some is difficult walking) and 33 km is inaccessible to w alkers. The majority of the 27 km of inaccessible coast does not appear to be excepted land. From the Coastal Access aspect it is the most complicated coastline in Kent. Part of the mainland route is along the Saxon Shore Way. 4.4.1.3 The view to seaw ard at the start is over the Medw ay estuary. There are extensive saltings and several uninhabited islands. The route then follows the River Sw ale to Sheppey and back to the Medw ay Estuary. The north and east coasts of Sheppey look out to the Thames Estuary.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2011) Kent Minerals and Waste Development Framework
    Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Kent Minerals And Waste Development Framework Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Options Consultation (May 2011) Commentary Report (November 2011) 1 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Produced by : Planning and Environment Environment and Enterprise Kent County Council Invicta House Tel: 01622 221610 County Hall Email: [email protected] Maidstone Web: www.kent.gov.uk/mwdf Kent ME14 1XX 2 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Contents Page 1 Abbreviations 4 2 Introduction 5 3 Site Proposals 7 4 Responses for Mineral Sites DPD 9 5 Soft Sand Sites for Consideration 11 6 Sharp Sand and Gravel Sites for Consideration 33 7 Crushed Rock Sites for Consideration 53 8 Silica Sand Sites for Consideration 57 9 Chalk Sites for Consideration 61 10 Brickearth Sites for Consideration 67 11 Clay Sites for Consideration 71 12 Mineral Import Sites for Consideration 73 13 Secondary & Recycled Aggregates Sites for Consideration 75 14 Glossary 101 3 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Abbreviations AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty MGB Metropolitan Green Belt AQMA Air Quality Management Area MOD Ministry of Defence BAP Biodiversity Action Plan NNR National Nature Reserve BOA Biodiversity Opportunity Area PINS Planning Inspectorate CPRE Campaign to Protect Rural England PPS Planning Policy Statement DPD Development Plan Documents PROW Public Right of Way SA Sustainability Appraisal
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Management of Small Pastures (Pdf)
    01 Kent Wildlife Trust Land Management Advice Series Management of Small Pastures This sheet includes information about the following topics: ● importance of pastures for wildlife ● types of grassland ● why graze? ● livestock and finding a grazier ● increasing the botanical diversity Cowden Pound Pastures: the large anthills indicate that the field has not been of your pasture ploughed or harrowed for several decades © Kent Wildlife Trust ● what time of year is best for This leaflet is designed to give owners ● semi-improved grassland contains a grazing? of small pastures some general wider array of species, typically between ● scrub recommendations on how to manage 8 to 15 per square metre ● other habitats in your pasture their land and assumes that the primary ● species-rich grassland contains over objective is to manage the land for 15 species per square metre. In Kent, ● dealing with ragwort and other nature conservation purposes. there are several different types of problem plants species-rich grassland: acid grassland, As part of the wider farmed landscape, ● references and further reading pastures have their part to play in neutral grassland and chalk grassland providing habitat for a range of species. (see Further reading). These types of ● further advice They can provide nesting sites for grassland can include over 40 species birds such as skylarks, a source of per square metre. invertebrates on which birds can feed Traditionally managed, wildflower-rich their chicks, cover for brown hares and grasslands have declined by 97% in habitat for over-wintering invertebrates. the last few decades, mainly as a result Pastures which are botanically diverse of agricultural intensification through (‘species-rich grassland’) can provide a more efficient farming techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.4 Strategic Options Report
    DOCUMENT 7.4 Strategic Options Report National Grid (Richborough Connection Project) Order Regulation 5(2)(q) of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 and TEN-E Regulation EU347/2013 First published June 2013 Application Ref: EN020017 January 2016 Richborough Connection Project Strategic Options Report for the South East Region June 2013 Issue 1 National Grid National Grid House Warwick Technology Park Gallows Hill Warwick CV34 6DA Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 3 2 Background................................................................................................ 7 3 Summary of the Need Case.........................................................................11 4 New Transmission Routes - National Grid’s Approach......................................14 5 Potential Strategic Options Identified for the Richborough Connection ..............20 6 Appraisal of Strategic Option 1 – Richborough to Canterbury North (onshore) ...27 7 Appraisal of Strategic Option 2 – Richborough to Cleve Hill (onshore)...............37 8 Appraisal of Strategic Option 3 – Richborough to Kemsley (onshore) ................48 9 Appraisal of Strategic Option 4 – Richborough to Cleve Hill (offshore)...............59 10 Appraisal of Strategic Option 5 – Richborough to Sellindge (offshore) ...........64 11 Appraisal of Strategic Option 6 – Richborough to Kemsley (offshore) ............70 12 Conclusions ...........................................................................................75
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Sites Booklet
    Discover Discover WILD SITESon your doorstep A visitor’s guide to wildlife sites in the Stour Valley WILD SITES on your doorstep on your About WILD SITES The Kentish Stour Explore the on your doorstep Countryside Partnership WILD SITES This booklet is designed to help you The Kentish Stour Countryside Partnership Get out there! explore and enjoy the fantastic (KSCP) organised the Wild Sites project. There are so many landscapes and special wildlife of the amazing places to The KSCP works to conserve, enhance and promote the enjoy nature and the outdoors in Stour Valley. countryside and urban green space of the Stour Valley. the Stour Valley! The Wild Sites are We work closely with landowners and communities to spread all over the KSCP Partnership To get the best out of your visit, go to our conserve and protect the landscapes, habitats and area (see map). They are very varied, website: www.wildsites.org and click wildlife of our Partnership area. We conserve and ranging in size from a few acres to ‘Explore Sites’ for full details of the sites. enhance all sorts of habitats, including the River Stour hundreds of hectares, from local and other watercourses, woodlands and wildlife rich parks to internationally important Much of the content in this guide book has been grasslands; we also create habitats for wildlife in urban nature reserves, owned and managed produced by participants in the Wild Sites on Your areas. Where we can, we develop opportunities for good by a range of bodies (see back cover). Doorstep project. Hundreds of people took part in access to the countryside and informal recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitstable to Nagden England Coast Path: Whitstable to Iwade - Natural England’S Proposals
    www.gov.uk/natural-england Chapter 1: Whitstable to Nagden England Coast Path: Whitstable to Iwade - Natural England’s Proposals Part 1.1: Introduction Start Point: Whitstable Harbour (grid reference: TR1086 6700) End Point: Nagden (grid reference: TR 0305 6328) Relevant Maps: 1a to 1g Understanding the proposals and accompanying maps: The Trail: 1.1.1 Generally follows existing walked routes, including public rights of way, along most of this length. 1.1.2 Mainly follows the coastline quite closely and maintains good views of the sea. 1.1.3 Follows a route similar to the Saxon Shore Way, a regionally promoted walking route, in the rural areas to the west. In the more urban areas of Whitstable and Seasalter, it departs from the Saxon Shore Way in order to follow the coast more closely (see Overview Map B – Existing Access: Whitstable to Iwade). 1.1.4 Is aligned on the beach between The Lower Island Golf Course, Whitstable and The Battery at Seasalter. See route sections WSI-1-S026, WSI-2-S027 and WSI-2-S029 to WSI-1-S034 on maps 1a and 1b, and table 1.2.1 below for details. 1.1.5 Includes one stretch of new path near Seasalter Levels. The route follows an inland diversion here to take the trail along the base of an inland flood defence bund south of Faversham Road, as the beach and Faversham Road are considered unsuitable for a National Trail at this location. See sections WSI-1-S039 to WSI-1-S044 on maps 1b and 1c, and table 1.2.1 below for details.
    [Show full text]
  • Faversham 2020: Town Action Plan
    FAVERSHAM 2020: Town Action Plan December 2012 TAP MAIN 21 FEB.indd 1 22/02/2013 15:19:59 Faversham 2020: Town Action Plan, December 2012 Faversham 2020: Town Action Plan, December 2012 Contents Page Foreword by Cllr David Simmons, Mayor of Faversham 3 Executive summary and key recommendations 4 Introduction to Faversham 2020 6 About Faversham 8 A vision for Faversham 12 Interpreting the feedback 13 Topic areas 15 Recommendations matrix 33 Annex A: Methodology 49 Annex B: Bibliography 52 Annex C: 2001 vision statement 54 2 3 TAP MAIN 21 FEB.indd 2 22/02/2013 15:20:00 Faversham 2020: Town Action Plan, December 2012 Faversham 2020: Town Action Plan, December 2012 Foreword by the mayor On behalf of Faversham Town Council, I am delighted to welcome the publication of Faversham 2020: the Town Action Plan. The plan builds on the Faversham 2006 Health Check and explores in detail the opportunities the localism agenda can deliver for Faversham. It has provided a voice to residents, many of whom have articulated, perhaps for the first time, their views of, and vision for, the future of Faversham for which we are extremely grateful. We also extend our thanks to Alison Eardley of Action for Market Towns and Laurence Young of the Faversham Enterprise Partnership who delivered the project supported by the Town Action Plan Steering Group. When the town council commissioned the Town Action Plan, our aim was to learn, in a more structured way, what residents wanted the town council to do and deliver on their behalf. The engagement process (details of which can be found at Annex A) has given people the opportunity to think carefully about their home town – what they like, what they don’t like, and what changes they want to see – and to make a set of recommendations for change.
    [Show full text]
  • North Kent Marshes – South Swale
    North Kent Marshes – South Swale Statement of Significance Swale Local Landscape Designations 1 Review and Recommendations 2018 Statement of Significance: North Kent Marshes: South Swale Marshes Extent of area: Part of the wider North Kent Mashes south of the Swale, covering an extensive area from Milton Creek in the west as far as the borough boundary at Graveney Marshes in the east where it joins Seasalter Marshes (AHLV) in Canterbury District. It includes the Swale channel, areas of intertidal land, the flat coastal marshes to the point where the topography rises, marking the transition to the adjacent enclosed farmland and including some of the marshes and channels that extend inland for example around Teynham and Graveney. 4: Graveney Grazing Lands (area north of Monkshill Road) Landscape character 5: Graveney Marshes (all) context 6: Ham Marshes (all) 8: Luddenham and Conyer Marshes (all) 17: Stone Arable Farmlands (small section at Little Uplees, including gravel pits) 31: Teynham Fruit Belt (small sections on edge of the marsh landscape) A highly distinctive landscape forming part of the wider North Kent Marshes - a vast and complex area of saltmarsh and mud flats isolated by the sea wall, coastal grazing marsh drained by a network of dykes and ditches, as well as small areas of improved farmed marsh dissected by drainage channels. The tidal creeks at Milton, Conyer and Oare and notable features. The whole area has a strong sense of place, with high levels of remoteness, wildness and isolation, much only accessible on foot; these are all rare qualities in SE England. Qualities • A vast, expansive coastal landscape with large empty skies.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Kent Biodiversity Action Plan
    The Kent Biodiversity Action Plan A framework for the future of Kent’s wildlife Produced by Kent Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group © Kent Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group, 1997 c/o Kent County Council Invicta House, County Hall, Maidstone, Kent ME14 1XX. Tel: (01622) 221537 CONTENTS 1. BIODIVERSITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE KENT PLAN 1 1.1 Conserving Biodiversity 1 1.2 Why have a Kent Biodiversity Action Plan? 1 1.3 What is a Biodiversity Action Plan? 1.4 The approach taken to produce the Kent Plan 2 1.5 The Objectives of the Kent BAP 2 1.6 Rationale for selection of habitat groupings and individual species for plans 3 2. LINKS WITH OTHER INITIATIVES 7 2.1 Local Authorities and Local Agenda 21 7 2.2 English Nature's 'Natural Areas Strategy' 9 3. IMPLEMENTATION 10 3.1 The Role of Lead Agencies and Responsible Bodies 10 3.2 The Annual Reporting Process 11 3.3 Partnerships 11 3.4 Identifying Areas for Action 11 3.5 Methodology for Measuring Relative Biodiversity 11 3.6 Action Areas 13 3.7 Taking Action Locally 13 3.8 Summary 14 4. GENERIC ACTIONS 15 2.1 Policy 15 2.2 Land Management 16 2.3 Advice/Publicity 16 2.4 Monitoring and Research 16 5. HABITAT ACTION PLANS 17 3.1 Habitat Action Plan Framework 18 3.2 Habitat Action Plans 19 Woodland & Scrub 20 Wood-pasture & Historic Parkland 24 Old Orchards 27 Hedgerows 29 Lowland Farmland 32 Urban Habitats 35 Acid Grassland 38 Neutral & Marshy Grassland 40 Chalk Grassland 43 Heathland & Mire 46 Grazing Marsh 49 Reedbeds 52 Rivers & Streams 55 Standing Water (Ponds, ditches & dykes, saline lagoons, lakes & reservoirs) 58 Intertidal Mud & Sand 62 Saltmarsh 65 Sand Dunes 67 Vegetated Shingle 69 Maritime Cliffs 72 Marine Habitats 74 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Ec Ecolo Ogy a and D Evi Iden
    Ecology and Evidence Winter newsletter 2017/18 DISCOVER wildlife, DATA gather, DELIVER cconservation Cover picture: Deptford pink Dianthus armeria, by Peter Atherall The Deptford pink has declined rapidly in range and is now known to inhabit only about 15 sites in the UK, mainly in the south. It prefers light, sandy, acidic soils, and requires open conditions to grow well. It can be found on disturbed ground, such as tracks and field edges, along hedgerows and in dry pasture. In Kent it is found on Kent Wildlife Trust’s Sandwich Bay National Nature Reserve and at Farnigham Woods. Kent Wildlife Trust Ecology and Evidence Winter newsletter 2017/18 Introduction community, visitor or educattional interest. For example at Welcome to the winter 2017/18 ecology and evidence our Queendown Warren reseerve in the Medway Smile newsletter, which this year is bigger than ever before. I Living Landscape, chalk grassland, woodland and early have taken the decision this year to encompass not only spider orchids have been identified as key nature Ecology Groups, but also to highlight the wealth of other conservation features. Each feature will have a number of work carried out by Kent Wildlife Trust and our volunteers attributes which are its charaacteristics, qualities or in the vital areas of monitoring and evidence. Evidence is properties. Attributes are the measurable performance absolutely critical to what we do, and it is increasingly indicators which together help to indicate the condition of important that we are able to demonstrate the efficacy of the feature. Examples might t be the size of an orchid colony, our management of Kent’s wildlife and habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Faversham Creek Navigation Guide
    Faversham Creek Navigation Guide Navigation Guide Supplies and Services Local History This project is being Faversham Town partly financed by the European Regional Centre Management Development Fund. This project has been supported by: Medway & Swale Angel Design – 01797 321380 Estuary Partnership; Swale Borough Council; Faversham Town Centre Management; Faversham Town Council; The Faversham Society. Printed June 2001 Introduction Faversham and its Creek Faversham The EEK Faversham and its creek lie on the north coast of Kent town centre Albion CR To Chandler AM in south-east England. The town is 10 miles from H S R Saxon Shore Way E Canterbury, 55 from London and 67 nautical miles V FA from Oostende. The Corner Shop Faversham and ty Faversham is a small market town with a population Front Brentst Je of nearly 18,000, renowned for its historic buildings, its creek lie on Bridge Rd local boat and brewing industries, picturesque the north coast farmland and estuarine landscapes. ane Abbey Street ay L Qu of Kent in Lane Wes th t Str or Swale Borough Council, Faversham Town Council eet N south-east and the Medway and Swale Estuary Partnership are Court St C working together to promote Faversham Creek and England, re W sc e Guild e Church st n its surrounding countryside to local and continental S Hall t 10 miles from tre R Cross Lane e o sailors. t a Chart d Canterbury, Mills South Road Stone StreetSwimming The Front Brents Jetty on Faversham Creek has 20 Tanners Street Ea 55 from Pool st berths. All water, electricity supply, lighting and St re et security has been renewed in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday Projects Swale Area, Oare Marshes, Wilderness Down & South Swale Reserves, Contact Laura Steuart on 07889 822408
    *project details may change, so please contact the relevant warden before the task* Monday Projects Swale Area, Oare Marshes, Wilderness Down & South Swale Reserves, Contact Laura Steuart on 07889 822408 Tuesday Projects Ashford Area, Hothfield Heathlands, Ashford Warren & other Ashford Nature Reserves: contact Ian Rickards on 07889 737839 and see details on task days and locations on our website. Canterbury Area, South Blean Will Douglas 07889 822412 Sandwich & Pegwell Bay and Ham Fen contact John Wilson 07808 568821 or 01227 719506 Dover Downs (various sites), contact Karen Weeks on 07889 274535 Wednesday Projects East Kent Downs (various sites), contact Karen Weeks 07889 274535 Canterbury & Whitstable Area, Reculver Country Park, Wraik Hill contact Mark Tuson on 07747 474365 Thursday Projects Canterbury Area - Larkey Valley Wood, Joan Beech Wood, contact Mark Tuson on 07747 474365 Sandwich & Pegwell Bay and Ham Fen – contact John Wilson 07808 568821 or 01227 719506 Friday Projects Ashford, Conningbrook area, contact Ian Rickards on 07889 737839 and see details on task days and locations on our website. Sunday Projects Ashford, Hothfield Heathlands, contact Ian Rickards on 07889 737839 and see details on task days and locations on our website. No special skills are required to take part in our task days, but plenty of enthusiasm, energy and a desire to help conserve Kent’s wildlife. The tasks are suited to all levels of physical ability and volunteers are encouraged to do the task at their own pace. Children under 16 must be accompanied by a parent or guardian at all times. Some tasks may be unsuitable for children so please check in advance with the relevant Warden.
    [Show full text]