May 2011) Kent Minerals and Waste Development Framework

Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Kent Minerals And Waste Development Framework

Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Options Consultation (May 2011) Commentary Report (November 2011)

1 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Produced by :

Planning and Environment

Environment and Enterprise

Kent County Council

Invicta House Tel: 01622 221610

County Hall Email: [email protected]

Maidstone Web: www.kent.gov.uk/mwdf

Kent ME14 1XX

2 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Contents Page

1 Abbreviations 4

2 Introduction 5

3 Site Proposals 7

4 Responses for Mineral Sites DPD 9

5 Soft Sand Sites for Consideration 11

6 Sharp Sand and Gravel Sites for Consideration 33

7 Crushed Rock Sites for Consideration 53

8 Silica Sand Sites for Consideration 57

9 Chalk Sites for Consideration 61

10 Brickearth Sites for Consideration 67

11 Clay Sites for Consideration 71

12 Mineral Import Sites for Consideration 73

13 Secondary & Recycled Aggregates Sites for Consideration 75

14 Glossary 101

3 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Abbreviations

AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty MGB Metropolitan Green Belt

AQMA Air Quality Management Area MOD Ministry of Defence

BAP Biodiversity Action Plan NNR National Nature Reserve

BOA Biodiversity Opportunity Area PINS Planning Inspectorate

CPRE Campaign to Protect Rural England PPS Planning Policy Statement

DPD Development Plan Documents PROW Public Right of Way SA Sustainability Appraisal EIA Environmental Impact Assessment SAC Special Area of Conserva- HER Historic Environment Record tion HGV Heavy Goods Vehicle SLA Special Landscaped Area

HRA Habitats Regulation Assessment SNCI Site of Nature Conserva- tion KCC Kent County Council SPA Special Protection Area

KHS Kent Highway Services SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest KWT Kent Wildlife Trust SWS Southern Water Site

LDF Local Development Framework TMBC Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council LWS Local Wildlife Site

4 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

2.0 Introduction

2.1 The Mineral Sites Development Plan Document (Options Stage) 2.5 As well as the online comments the Council also received a num- Commentary Report is the follow up document to the consultation for ber of petitions; the Mineral Sites Development Plan Document. The consultation period ran from the 31st of May 2011 to the 26th of July, however there Petition Amount of Signatures th was a 2 week extension until the 9 of August. Charing-Sites 201 10,16,62,69,74,77,85,86 and 87

Lenham- Sites 75 and 76 77 2.2 This document collates and summarises the responses for each of the sites to show the main reasons for support , objection or com- Hollowshore and Ham Farm- 616 menting from organisations and members of the public. The aim of Sites 25 and 26 this report is to create a clear and concise document showing the main issues put forward. If people wish to read full responses they Lydd Quarry- Site 73 (ongoing e- 21 may access them through the online consultation portal at; http:// petition) consult.kent.gov.uk/portal. This brought the total number of responses up to 2620.

2.3 Those responses put forward will be recorded as part of the site assessment. Data collection and site visit reports will then be formu- 2.6 The Council has received detailed reports on sites from the resi- lated, taking into consideration the emerging Minerals and Waste dents of Lenham, Badgers Mount and Shoreham Parish Council. Core Strategy policies and changes to national planning policy. The Preferred Options are due to be published and consulted upon in Reports were given to Minerals and Waste Development Framework May 2012. (MWDF) team outside of the consultation but the comments from these internal consultees are considered to be important in informing 2.4 The Mineral Sites ‘options’ consultation received the following the site selection process and so have been summarised for this re responses; port.

Total Number of Responses 1705 Objection 1452

Comment 219

Support 34

5 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

2.7 Sites with the most responses/objections; 2.9 There were some recurring concerns which applied to many of the sites. These comments included; Site Refer- Name ence Number •The suitability of roads 10 Pluckley Road, Charing •Damage to homes, both structurally and in terms of value 62 Newlands Farm, Charing 69 Burleigh Farm, Charing •Sites that are in or near to designated land 74 Charing Quarry •Public safety 75 Boltons Field, Lenham •Impact on biodiversity 76 Chapel Farm, Lenham

77 Burleigh Farm & Tile Lodge, Charing 2.10 Space is restricted in this report. All comments are valued and 5 Filston Lane will be taken into consideration in the site assessment process. Full 25 Ham Farm (Withdrawn) responses can be accessed via the online consultation portal; 26 Hollowshore http://consult.kent.gov.uk. 73 Lydd Quarry

7 Hermitage Quarry Westerly Extension 2.11 The graphs found in this report represent the number of re- 8 Chelsfield Ammunition Depot sponses for each site. The internal responses we received from 12 Newington Industrial Estate heritage, biodiversity and highways are not included in this data.

86 Charing Quarry (waste 2)

2.8 The other mineral sites had responses from within KCC or outside organisations but had fewer or no comments from members of the public.

6 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

3 Site Proposals 3.3 Sharp Sand and Gravel Sites for Consideration

3.1 The following is a list of all sites submitted for consideration for minerals uses. The list contains their site reference number and the 2 Beltring Green Farm 33 relevant page in this document.

3.2 Soft Sand Sites for Consideration 3 Arnolds Lodge Farm 35 West 4 Woodfalls Farm 37

5 Filston Lane 39 Site Reference Num- Name Page Number ber 17 Moat Farm 41 6 Land Adjacent to Platt 11 Industrial Estate 25 Ham Farm 43

9 Celcon Works 13 26 Hollowshore 45

10 Pluckley Road, Charing 15 49 Land North and South 47 of Hammer Dyke 24 Land North of Addington 17 Lane 71 Stonecastle Farm 49 62 Newlands Farm, Char- 19 ing 73 Lydd Quarry 51 69 Burleigh Farm, Charing 21 3.4 Crushed Rock Sites for Consideration 74 Charing Quarry 23

75 Boltons Field, Lenham 25 7 Hermitage Quarry West- 53 erly Extension 76 Chapel Farm, Lenham 27 78 Richborough Under- 55 77 Burleigh Farm & Tile 29

97 Shrine Farm 31

7 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

3.5 Silica Sand Sites for Consideration 3.9 Mineral Importation sites for Consideration

Site Reference Num- Name Page Number 1 East Peckham Rail De- 73 ber pot 24 Land North of Addington 57 Lane 3.10 Secondary & Recycled Aggregate

62 Newlands Farm, Char- 59 ing 8 Chelsfield Ammunition 75 Depot 3.6 Chalk Sites for Consideration 12 Newington Industrial 77 Estate

16 Beacon Hill Quarry 61 21 FM Conway, Rochester 79 Way

56 Hegdale Quarry 63 45 Dunbrik Depot 81

63 Pinden Quarry 65 52 Weatherlees 83 56 Hegdale Quarry 85 3.7 Brickearth Sites for Consideration 65 Land North of Stevens 87 Carlotti

19 Paradise Farm 67 72 Unit 14 Canterbury In- 89 dustrial Park 92 Land at Bax Farm 69 79 Tilmanstone 91

80 Faversham Quarry 93 3.8 Clay Sites for Consideration 81 Milton Manor Farm 95

86 Charing Quarry 97 60 Norwood Quarry & 71 (waste2) Landfill Extension 91 Animal Products Site 99

8 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

4.0 Mineral Sites Development Plan Document support 0

Responses regarding the complete Mineral Sites Develop- comment 17 Responses ment Plan Document

object 15

0 5 10 15 20

Responses Port of London Authority None of the sites set out in the options consultation document are located in close proximity to the River Thames and therefore the PLA has no comments to make on the individual sites. However, it would appear to be useful in the introductory text to emphasise the point from the Core Strategy concerning the Council's aspi- rations regarding co-location of facilities.

Kent Wildlife Trust We welcome the fact that the after use suggested is for biodiversity enhancement in the majority of cases. We understand that not all these sites will come forward in the final document, many of the sites proposed will either have a direct or indirect impact. Of particular concern is the impact from a number of sites proposed on the Swale SPA and Ramsar sites and surrounding areas likely to be used by the bird populations. Within the documents Local Wildlife Sites are either called County Wildlife Sites or Sites of Nature Conservation Interest. These sites were historically known as SNCIs however when they become recognised within national policy and administrated by the Biodiversity Action Groups rather than the Wildlife Trusts it was agreed that they would be known by one name, Local Wildlife Sites, and should be referenced as such to prevent confusion.

Protect Kent We have serious concerns about the loss of prime agricultural land. We would expect to see the impacts mitigated through a phased approach. We wish to see these sites reinstated to agriculture. We have concerns about the impacts of all traffic movements on and in the vicinity of the proposed sites. We would expect a full traffic study for each site. As some of the proposed sites cover a large area, if selected we would expect to see control over development through a phased approach. As some of the proposed sites are concentrated within one locality, we would expect to see sequential operation of the sites. While we have recommended rejection of some large sites, a reduction in their size may make them more acceptable.

9 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Responses

RSPB Ideally, the principal after use on minerals sites will be to UKBAP priority habitat. The number of after-uses should be limited to ensure objectives are not unduly compromised. Habitat creation should contribute to BAP targets, and be established early on in the planning process. The number of habitats that sites are restored to should be limited. Large blocks of a smaller range of habitats on any one site tend to perform better ecologically and are often simpler to manage in the long-term, than an over-complex mosaic of many different habitats. Habitat creation should complement the adjacent sites of importance for biodiversity, so as to buffer, link and extend them thereby increasing their robustness and resistance to change.

TMBC The designation list under the heading ‘Constraints' is incomplete. No reference is made to RIGS or BOAs. Consideration needs to be given to these designations when assessing sites. Key elements of green infrastructure should also form part of the assessment. Under ‘Operational Constraints' the proximity and capacity of the nearest highway should be assessed. This could potentially feature under ‘Opportunities' as well. The wider cumulative impacts also need to be taken into account, especially if there are a few sites located close to each other which are likely to use the same infrastructure.

KCC has indicated a clear way forward on many mineral matters. There is also a clearly defined spatial vision and draft strategic objectives. The assessment stage should build-in a process whereby each promoted site is systematically assessed against the draft spatial strategy vision, draft strategic objectives and, where applicable, preferred option. This could take the form of a spreadsheet where conformity of the sites with each of the above elements is demonstrated by a simple tick.

Under the heading ‘Other Land Use Constraints' the criteria focus on distances to homes and community facilities. One of the criteria should be proximity to nearest settlement.

Woodland Trust Planning Policy Statement 9 on Biodiversity and Geological Conservation states: ‘Ancient woodland is a valuable biodiversity resource both for the diversity of species and for its longevity as woodland. Once lost it cannot be recreated. Local planning authorities should identify any areas of ancient woodland in their areas that do not have statutory protection (e.g. as an SSSI). They should not grant planning permission for any developments that would result in its loss or deterioration.’

Sandwich Town Council The document contains errors. The table of site proposals on pages 10-12 do not agree with the map of sites and the actual detailed descriptions of sites. Sites 78 and 65 appear in the table of site proposals, sites 78 and 54 are shown on the map and the detailed descriptions relate to sites 52,78 and 65. This makes it extremely confusing for the correct responses to be submitted.

10 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

5 Soft Sand Sites for Consideration Site 6- Total Responses 16 Land Adjacent to Platt Industrial Estate support 1

5.1 This site is located to the north of Platt village and to the comment 9 Responses east of Borough Green, in an area of historic mineral extraction. The site would make use of existing infrastructure used by the neighbouring mineral extraction areas to the north and object 6 east of the site. The site is within close proximity to the M26 and M20 motorways. This site is within the Green Belt. 0246810

Responses District/ Borough TMBC- The majority of the site is located within the MGB. A small part of the western part of the site is located within the Platt Industrial Site designation.

Parish Council Platt- Lorry movements are already unacceptable. Close proximity to school. Hazardous for pedestrians. A25 would struggle with extra traffic. Already experience dust and debris from existing sites. If proposal is to be considered then a new route should be stipulated.

Borough Green-Impact would be best mitigated by the site entrance being moved to the East, either exiting via Clubb’s Nepicar Sandpit, or directly to Nepicar Roundabout.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area Heritage The southern part of the proposed minerals site has a high potential for the presence of important archaeological remains. Further archaeological assessment including field evaluation is necessary prior to a planning decision to determine whether important remains are present and whether quarrying of the southern part of the site is appropriate.

Biodiversity UK and Local protected species within site. European protected species within 1km and within a Local designated site.

11 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways The entrance to Platt Industrial estate has a less than desirable impact on the local community with a history of conflicts regarding safety and volume. This is principally due to; the limited width of the A25 and limited footway width and separation between traffic and pedestrians on the footway. The most sensitive pedestrian area is to and from the Platt C of E Primary School. The use of the Clubb (Nepicar) entrance onto the A25 would be preferable as it is more accommodating in terms of bell mouth widths and radiuses, visibility and through road width. The pedestrian activity is also less in this area.

Natural England Need to consider phasing of working and restoration to minimise impacts on the setting of the AONB.

Kent Wildlife Trust We do not object to this site being excavated for sand however the acidic grassland present as a BAP habitat should be replaced and managed. It is also important that as many of the trees are retained as practical and any trees lost should be replaced within the restoration to ensure connectivity is restored in the longer term if not, ideally, maintained throughout the period of quarrying.

Earth Enterprises- Support Mineral use would not necessarily conflict with its Green Belt location. The site will be restored giving consideration to the current landscape and the possibilities to improve the drainage and biodiversity through tree planting, drainage ditches and balancing ponds.

RSPB Restoration to woodland would provide a link between the Ancient Woodland to the north and to the south (Valley Wood). It would be of use if the restoration was complemented by biodiversity restoration on the adjacent Borough Green Sand Pits site.

Kent Downs AONB 500 m from Kent Downs AONB-Need to consider phasing of working and restoration to minimise impacts on the setting of the AONB which would include improvement of existing mineral workings.

General Public Responses -Would degrade the social and environmental fabric of the area.

-A25 already congested

-Hazardous for pedestrians

-Pollution and noise

-Already a constant stream of HGV’s from Platt industrial estate

12 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 9- Total Responses 12

Celcon Works support 1

5.2 This site is an extension to the existing Ightham Sand Pit, comment 4 Responses in Borough Green. The area continues to be an area of mineral extraction due to the Folkestone beds sand found in the area. This site is within the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding object 7 Natural Beauty.

02468

Responses

District/Borough TMBC- The safeguarded route of the Borough Green Bypass passes through this site.

Parish Borough Green- Object- The bulk of this site is effectively sterilised by the route of the Borough Green & Platt Bypass. Ample supplies of soft sand within the immediate area. Within Greenbelt and the North Downs AONB. Would generate significant HGV traffic through the villages.

Platt- Access to site must be through the Cemex Site on the A227. Will adversely impact on Grade II Listed Ightham Court. Part of the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Concerns about wood treatment chemicals and CO2 that might be released by combustion

Wrotham-Object-The perched ponds within the area are breeding ponds for large colonies of Great Crested Newts. The area is heavily polluted by hydrocarbons. Within Kent Downs AONB.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area Heritage A programme of archaeological evaluation and mitigation should be implemented in advance of extraction. This should involve initial trial trenching including test pitting to assess the potential for prehistoric remains, followed by any necessary further work to ensure the impact of minerals extraction is fully addressed. Devel- opment should consider and avoid any impact on the setting of the Listed Buildings at Cricketts Farm and Ightham Court and the Historic Park and Garden.

13 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Biodiversity UK protect species within site. European Protected Species within 1km and local designated site within 1km

Highways HGV route along A25 Borough Green Road. Only proposed development to date is a large residential development off of Quarry Hill Road (no application has been submitted to date).

Natural England Whilst this site is an extension of an existing quarry it extends the operation into the Kent Downs AONB. The Council will need to be satisfied that the site meets the “exceptional circumstances‟ required under PPS7 and alternatives have been explored before taking the site forward.

RSPB Within the Greens and Heaths and Commons BOA. Restoration to broadleaf native woodland, acid grassland or heathland would be appropriate. It would be of use if the restoration was complemented by biodiversity restoration on the adjacent Ightham Sand Pit site.

Kent Downs AONB The site would provide a continued supply of soft sand to the existing Celcon Works in Borough Green and utilise existing infrastructure. The site lies within the Kent Downs AONB so could potentially create negative landscape and visual impacts. As a historic area of mineral working, with ongoing extraction within the AONB, these impacts could be mitigated through maintaining high environmental standards and ensuring that the site is well restored. The AONB object to any further working in this area and call for the final restoration of the whole site to agriculture to avoid any further impact on the AONB and the environs of Ightham Court, an historic house and park within the AONB.

General Public Responses -Most of the site is designated in the Kent and Medway Structure Plan and the TMBC LDF for the Borough Green and Platt Bypass.

-The site is in the Green Belt and AONB

-Would generate more HGV traffic movements

14 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 10- Total Responses 301

Pluckley Road, Charing support 0

5.3 This site is located south of Charing village and is about 6 comment 4 Responses miles from Ashford. The site consists of three fields with a small stream and a Public Right of Way crossing the site. The site is currently used for rough grazing and is surrounded by object 297 adjoining farmland and agriculture.

(Responses include a resident petition of 201 signatures) 0 100 200 300 400

Responses

Parish Council Charing-Object- . Noise. Smell. Security lights. Security. Dust - properties already suffer one or more of these. Within these sites there is archaeology from the Roman and earlier periods-many have not yet been investigated. The vehicle movements quoted for all sites do not take into account the ancillary vehicle movements necessary for all the sites. Damage to water courses that supply us and the Stour. Sites are easily viewed from the “AONB‟ and “SLA".

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area.

Heritage Likely to have an impact on the setting of the Grade II*Listed Newlands Manor. Also likely have an impact on the mill bank. It would be preferable that the western field be taken out of the allocations. A substantial buffer should be created between the quarrying and the Listed Buildings and the dam to the south. The site has a high potential for the presence of important archaeological remains. Further archaeological assessment including field evaluation is necessary.

Biodiversity European and Local protected species within site. UK and Local designated site within 1km.

15 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways It is of the opinion of KHS that this increase in traffic on Pluckley Road is not acceptable. There are pinch points in Charing village where the road narrows to less than the required width for two HGV’s to pass safely. Access from Newlands Road and Hook road is the most acceptable route as this is already an HGV routing.

Environment Agency We have concerns about allocations at these sites. Any development would destroy watercourses, and potentially disrupt natural drainage downstream.

Natural England Individually these sites may not present a landscape issue but in-combination they potentially could have a significant impact on views from the Kent Downs AONB. Streams crossing the sites are likely to contain the white tailed crayfish which is protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

Charing Archaeological Group Object-This is a particularly sensitive area where the archaeology has been totally unexplored until now. 3 or possibly 4 dams have been discovered. Near the artificial fishpond at the south of 62 but in 10 is an enclosure visible on the ground and on satellite within which are clearly visible hut bases.

Kent Wildlife Trust This site is within 300m of Hurst Wood Charing Heath LWS designated for its ancient woodland and disused sand pit. The health of the woodland is dependant on the damp soils within the site and contains 17 ancient woodland indicators within the ground flora.

RSPB This site is close to the Mid Kent Greensands and Gault BOA which advocates acidic grassland creation. As such we support the proposed restoration to acidic grasslands. We would recommend that the additional proposed restoration of "conservation" is removed, since this is encompassed by the acidic grasslands.

General Public Responses -World War II special site– 52 soldiers died there– Vibration could damage building foundations–

Noise and Scale– Roads not suitable for HGV’s– Public Safety where pedestrians have to walk on the

road– Health Hazard from silica dust-Potential damage to water courses-Impact on property values-

Vermin may be attracted-Hedgerows along the A20 are rich in species-Pluckley Road is an accident

black spot– Vehicles may leave mess along the road– Site can be viewed from the North Downs AONB

and Special Landscape Area-Footpath would be lost-A tributary for the River Stour runs under the site

and may become polluted -Reduction in agricultural land-Altering the course of the stream could lead

to flooding in other locations-No proven need identified-Loss of a community- would change character

of the area-There may be Roman remains on this site.

16 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 24- Total Responses 9

Land North of Addington Lane support 2

5.4 The site is a proposed extension to the existing Addington comment 5 Responses (Wrotham) Quarry. The site is within the Kent Downs Area Of Natural Beauty situated on the Folkestone beds. The upper sands are intended for building sand and the lower deposit is object 2 suitable for use as industrial sand (silica sand). This site can also be found in 8.1: Silica Sand Sites for Consideration. 0246

Responses District/Borough TMBC- The site is a proposed extension to the existing Addington (Wrotham) Quarry. The site is within the Kent Downs Area of Natural Beauty and contains Folkestone beds sand. The upper sands are intended for building sand and the lower deposit is suitable for use as industrial sand.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waster water area.

Biodiversity European Protected Species within site. UK and Local protected species within 1km of site. UK and Local designated sites within 1km.

17 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Natural England Site within Kent Downs AONB. Whilst this site is an extension of an existing quarry it extends the operation to the north of Addington Lane on the opposite side to the existing workings and potentially opens up the possibility of extending quarrying operations eastward. The Council will need to be satisfied that the site meets the "exceptional circumstances‟ required under PPS7.

The National Trust Object- The National Trust owns Wrotham Water Farm to the west of this site and Coldrum Long Barrow to the north. This site lies within the Kent Downs AONB and adjacent to the Wealdway which leads to Coldrum and thence up the escarpment of the North Downs. The site is hitherto open countryside, and is likely to be highly visible from the Downs.

Protect Kent Rejection recommended, due to: site being within the Kent Downs AONB; cumulative landscape and visual impacts; proximity to SNCI and Ancient Woodland that is already impacted by quarrying in the vicinity; impact on public rights of way.

RSPB This site is within the Greensands Heaths and Commons BOA for which heathland and acid grassland are advocated for restoration. We would encourage restoration of this site to one of these habitats, or to woodland to complement the nearby site. Should the restoration be to agriculture as proposed, biodiversity gains should still be included, for example ponds and species rich hedges.

Kent Wildlife Trust This site is within 86m of Ryash Wood LWS designated for its ancient woodland. The woodland and the site's ecological health is dependant on its hydrology being damp in nature. Although we do not object to this site being excavated as it is a natural extension of the existing quarry, attention should be given to protection of the LWS from the impacts of dust and other pollutants.

Kent Downs AONB The Kent Downs AONB will resist and object to this site. It prolongs the life of a plant and activity in the AONB that should never have received planning permission. Restoration quality is not good and not guaranteed. The landscape impact on the AONB is not justified by either the need for soft sand, or not particularly high grade silica sand. Grant of permissions in the AONB should only be contemplated in exceptional circumstances.

18 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 62- Total Responses 303

Newlands Farm, Charing support 1

5.5 Newlands Farm is located near Charing village. The site comment 3 Responses borders another submitted site. The geology of the site is Folkestone Bed sand and the site will provide both building sand and silica sand. There is a Public Right of Way running object 299 across the northern area of the site. The site is also in 8.2: Silica Sand Sites for Consideration. (Responses include a resident petition of 201 signatures) 0 100 200 300 400

Responses Parish Council Charing- Object- Noise. Smell. Security lights. Security. Dust - properties already suffer one or more of these. Within these sites there is archaeology from the Roman and earlier periods that has not been investigated. Maps from 1639 showing chapels (2) and other buildings on site 62. Damage to water courses that supply us and the Stour. Sites can be viewed from AONB and SLA.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Strong planning policies will be required to protect underground sewers and/or water mains.

Heritage Likely to have an impact on the setting of the Grade II* Listed Buildings at Newlands Manor. Would impact directly on the site of the V1 explosion which resulted in a very significant loss of life. Any disturbance of this site would need to be permitted through licensing by the Ministry of Defence.

Biodiversity European and Local protected species within site. UK protect species and Local designated site within 1km.

Highways There are pinch points in Charing village where the road narrows to less that the required width for two HGVs to pass safely. Hook Lane could be widened to allow access for HGVs.

19 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Environment Agency We have concerns about allocations at these sites. Any development would destroy watercourses, and potentially disrupt natural drainage. Natural England Individually these sites may not present a landscape issue but in-combination they potentially could have a significant impact on views from the Kent Downs AONB. A number of streams that feed into the Great Stour cross or border the proposed mineral sites. These streams are likely to contain the white tailed crayfish which is protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

Charing Archaeological Group The area of Site 62 is sufficiently important nationally for there to be a moratorium on further inclusion in the MWDF proposals. Protect Kent Rejection recommended, due to: no obvious access to the site; severe impacts on Charing village and surrounding communities due to traffic; impact on adjacent SNCI and nearby Ancient Woodland; impact on historic features and interests in the neighbourhood; impact on public rights of way; potential visual impact on views from the AONB.

Charing Heath Action Group It is not clear from the proposals how access can be achieved to this site . A tributary for the river Stour runs under this site that would cause pollution to fish and wild life that require clear water for survival. Site 62 contains a modern historic site where 52 servicemen died during WW2. RSPB Consideration would be required to impacts on local biodiversity. We welcome the proposed restoration, however would encourage a limitation to the number of habitats restored. Kent Wildlife Trust This site is adjacent to Hurst Wood LWS which is designated for its ancient woodland and sand pit habitats. The health of the woodland is dependant on the damp soils within the site. The disused sand pit has been colonised by a number of rare flora and invertebrate species. General Public Responses -World War II special site- 52 soldiers died there-Vibration-Could damage building foundations-Noise

and Scale-Public Safety: Areas with no pavements-Health Hazard: Spread of silica dust-Potential dam-

age to watercourses –Impact on property values-Smell may attract vermin-Not enough room for two

lorries to pass each other.-Hedgerows along the A20 are rich in species-Already an accident black

spot along Pluckley Road-Mess may be left from vehicles along the road.-Site can be viewed from the

North Downs AONB and SLA-Footpath would be lost-Could pollute a tributary to the River Stour-

Reduction in agricultural land-Altering the course of the stream could lead to flooding-No proven need

identified-Loss of a community- There may be Roman remains on this site.

20 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 69- Total Responses 297

Burleigh Farm, Charing support 0

5.6 Burleigh Farm is located in the Charing area. The site is comment 7 Responses adjacent to an existing permitted site and in close proximity to other site submissions. The site submission included two access options either via the Charing Heath Road or using a object 290 conveyor into the existing adjoining site. There is a Public Right of Way running through the centre of the site. (Responses include a resident petition of 201 signatures) 0 100 200 300 400

Responses

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area and wastewater infrastructure crossing the site

Heritage Proposals for quarrying that affect the historic hedgerows and the setting of Listed Buildings, in particular Bur- leigh Farm and the ruined chapel, should not be permitted. Access from the site is likely to have unacceptable impacts on hedgerows.

Biodiversity European protected species within 1km. UK and Local designated site within 1km.

Highways KHS has concerns about accessing this site from Charing Heath Road owing to width restrictions. The access onto the A20 could also be an issue as the speed limit is 60mph.

21 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Environment Agency Any development would destroy watercourses and potentially disrupt natural drainage downstream.

Natural England Individually these sites may not present a landscape issue but in-combination they potentially could have a significant impact on views from the Kent Downs AONB. A number of streams that feed into the Great Stour cross or border the proposed mineral sites. Many of these streams are likely to contain the white tailed crayfish which is protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

Kent Wildlife Trust No objection to the excavation of this site. It is agricultural land and so is unlikely to contain high biodiversity value and is not in the locality of any designated sites. There is a small pocket of woodland on the adjacent site which should be retained and protected within the construction process.

Charing Archaeological Group Subject of rejection on Appeal some 10 years ago. A ruined scheduled chapel seen on a map dated 1639 also shows a number of buildings around the chapel. Immediately outside the east end of the site is Tile Lodge Farm it was a centre of a thriving 17th Century tile manufactory. Both may have Roman origins. RSPB It would be important to ensure there were no negative impacts, for example hydrological impacts, on the nearby Ancient Woodland sites, including Burleigh Wood and Charing Heath Wood. We would encourage a limitation on the number of habitats restored.

Protect Kent Rejection recommended, due to: severe impacts on views from the AONB; impacts on public rights of way. We understand a proposal for this site was dismissed at appeal, about 10 years ago, and regard should be given to this decision.

Operator/Owner A field conveyor can go under the road, without the need to cross the road with dump trucks or HGVs. Suita- bly sufficient un-worked buffer zones will be left around the margins of the site, which can be planted with trees or used for grassed soils bunds.

General Public Responses -Cause reduction in prime agricultural land-Permission previously refused around 10 years ago-1639

map shows 8 buildings that haven’t been investigated-May be a landfill site after use- Smell and pollu-

tion- Disruption to countryside and damage to country lanes, wildlife and ancient hedgerows-Traffic

congestion and road safety-Water contamination-River Stour-Roads not suitable for HGVs- Charing

Heath Road too narrow-Not an extension of an existing quarry-Roman and Middle Ages Archaeology-

Railway embankment constantly built up due to slippage-Visually obtrusive from Pilgrims Way

22 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 74- Total Responses 288

Charing Quarry support 1

5.7 This site adjoins the existing Charing Quarry and is pro- comment 5 Responses posed as a small extension to the permitted quarry. The extension will make use of the existing mineral processing plant and access onto Charing Heath Road. object 282 (Responses include a resident petition of 201 signatures) 0 100 200 300

Responses

Parish Council Charing-Object- Noise. Smell. Security lights. Security. Dust - properties already suffer one or more of these. Within these sites there is archaeology from the Roman and earlier periods that, as yet, many have not been investigated. The vehicle movements quoted for all sites do not take into account the ancillary vehicle movements necessary for all the sites. Damage to water courses that supply us and the Stour.

Utility Companies Southern Water-Within SWS waste water area

Heritage Quarrying of this site should be avoided as it would impact on important archaeological remains. Further archaeological evaluation is necessary to confirm the full potential of the site.

Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species and Local Designated site within 1km.

Highways It appears that the site is an extension of the existing site and so access is assumed to be from the existing access on Hook Lane. Hook Lane has been widened in recent years to improve access to the existing site, therefore KHS cannot foresee any issues with this site.

23 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Natural England Potentially could have a significant impact on views from the Kent Downs AONB. A number of streams that feed into the Great Stour cross or border the proposed mineral sites. Many of these streams are likely to contain the white tailed crayfish which is protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

Charing Heath Action Group Site 74 should be removed and KCC should request Brett to keep to their promise to finalise the restoration of the Charing Quarry in line with their planning application.

Kent Downs AONB This quarry is in the setting of the Kent Downs AONB although well screened the southern, north facing boundary of the existing site, and that proposed is visible and requires careful restoration to ensure restored views are in keeping with the surrounding landscape character.

Kent Wildlife Trust No objections in principle to the excavation of this site. However it will be important to consider the in combination impacts of this development with Site 77 and 86 of the Minerals Sites Document and site 85 and 87 of the Waste Sites Document.

RSPB Creation of lowland wood-pasture or lowland dry acid grassland would be suitable on this site and on the adjoining Charing Quarry. Restoring both the existing quarry and the proposed extension to the same habitat would be of benefit.

Protect Kent Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment. Note: we question the need to allocate this site, due to its small size (0.66 ha), rather than it be considered through the normal development control process.

General Public Responses -Too close to dwellings -Would cause a reduction in prime agricultural land -Hook Lane not suitable

for heavy traffic movements -Railway bridge already cracking and in need of repair -Noise and light

pollution -Loss of historic hedgerows and natural habitat for wildlife -Public right of way (AW34) runs

across the site -Concerns over restoration-will it be used for landfill? -Damage to road surface -May

impact on number of visitors -Contamination of water course -Damage to listed buildings -No proven

need tor the site

24 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 75- Total Responses 186

Boltons Field, Lenham support 1

5.8 This site is a proposed extension to the adjoining Lenham comment 6 Responses Quarry. The mineral will be worked through the existing quarry facilities. object 179 (Responses include a resident petition of 77 signatures)

0 50 100 150 200

Responses

District/Borough MaidstoneBC-Object- The Council is concerned that quarrying at this site would significantly compromise residential amenity in proximity to the site. The Council also doubts that potential adverse effects on residential amenity can be sufficiently mitigated in the area surrounding the proposed site.

Faversham TC- Object- due to status of environmentally important and sensitive site.

Parish Council Lenham-Object- Visual impact from the point of view that the sites are close to areas of AONB. Protection of ancient woodlands and SNCI's, any such sites should remain undisturbed as they offer habitat to both bird and wildlife species. The loss of agricultural land, and the produce from such land. The lack of infrastructure capable of coping with the increased transport demands. Environmental impact, the considerations of noise, dust, fumes, and light pollution.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area. Heritage As development could potentially affect buried archaeological deposits a programme of archaeological works should be implemented in advance of development. This can be secured through a condition on any consent.

Biodiveristy European, UK and Local designated species and Local designated site within 1km.

25 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways The site is remote from the main road network, so not ideal as a generator of heavy vehicle movements. How- ever the access via Rose Lane has been previously used by HGVs for some years. Nevertheless, the lane is narrow and unsuited for large vehicles.

Natural England Could have a significant impact on views from the Kent Downs AONB. A number of streams that feed into the Great Stour cross or border the proposed mineral sites. Many of these streams are likely to contain the white tailed crayfish which is protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

Kent Wildlife Trust This site is within 127m of Pasture and Ponds Lenham Forstal LWS. The impacts on the LWS have not been highlighted within the SA and no mitigation is currently offered within the restoration package. The LWS is designated for its neutral grassland and ponds which could be impacted by excavation in the area with hydrological processes being altered and the water habitats polluted.

RSPB This site and the adjoining Lenham Quarry are adjacent to the Lenham Heath SNCI. Restoration of this site should complement the wetland habitats found on the SNCI. Alternatively, creation of lowland dry acid grassland would be suitable on this site and on the adjoining Lenham Quarry. Restoration of both the existing quarry and the proposed extension to the same habitat would be of benefit.

Protect Kent Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment, provided that: impacts on adjacent residential properties and occupants are fully understood, assessed and conditioned against in any subsequent permission

Operator The source of aggregates at Lenham Quarry is from a known geological deposit, of known quality, which has served the local construction markets for many years. The site has established links to the local highway network. We have commissioned a noise impact assessment of the proposed extension, which concludes a 30m buffer zone is sufficient. It is proposed to restore the site to a lower level and return the site back to an agricultural after use.

General Public Response -Devalue properties- Destroy countryside- Noise, light pollution and vibration- What will the hole be filled with?- Heavy traffic and road safety issues- Loss of public footpaths– Impact on dog walkers- Loss/impact on Ancient Woodland, AONB, SNCI and site of historic interest- Impact on wildlife protected within the UK BAP- Cumulative impact of developments such as M20 and High Speed Rail Link- Mess being left on roads- Weight limit on Tile Lodge Road- No proven need- Rose Lane is unsuitable for access-Damage to hedgerows- Loss of Tourism- Crime- Having equipment on site will attract criminal activity- Water Supply- The mains supply terminates on the site.

26 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 76- Total Responses 16

Chapel Farm, Lenham support 1

5.9 This site is a proposed extension to the existing Lenham comment 6 Responses Quarry which is 1km to the west of the proposed site. The site is to the south of the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. There is an area of Ancient Woodland adja- object 216 cent to the proposed route of the haul road. The site adjoins an existing sewage works and is close to Chilston Historic Park. (Responses include a resident petition of 77 signatures) 0 50 100 150 200 250

Responses District/Borough Maidstone BC-Object- This is an extremely large site and the Council is concerned that the cumulative impacts of operations in the area would potentially have a negative impact on landscape (setting of AONB), visual amenity, SNCI and ancient woodland, and residential amenity (particularly where roads are deemed unsuitable for heavy vehicles). Parish Council Lenham-Object- Visual impact as the site is close to an AONB. Protection of ancient woodlands and sites of nature conservation, it is of paramount importance that any such sites remain undisturbed as they offer habitat to wildlife species. The loss of agricultural land, and the produce from such land. The lack of infrastructure capable of coping with the increased transport. Environmental impact, the considerations of noise, dust, fumes and light pollution. Utility Companies Southern Water-Objects- On the grounds of proximity to its waste water treatment works, unless appropriate planning policies can be agreed which protect the works and safeguard their continued operation and future expansion. Strong planning policies will be required to protect underground sewers and/or water mains.

Heritage The proposed minerals site has a very high potential for the presence of important archaeological remains and in particular investigations in the area to the east of Chapel Farm has confirmed the presence of important archaeology there. Likely to have an impact on the setting of the Grade II* Listed Building at Royton Manor and Chapel Mill. Would also potentially affect the setting of Listed Buildings at Mount Castle Farm, Lenham For- stall and the Bull Inn. Appropriate buffers and screening would be necessary.

27 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species and Local Designated site within site. UK designated site within 1km. Highways No current direct access north from the site onto the A20. Unless this can be created, access would be through Lenham Forstal. This would take HGVs on narrow roads past residential properties.

Environment Agency Serious concerns about this site as this is the top of the River Stour. Any alterations to the water table could have serious consequences for the watercourse and its drainage. Natural England Chapel Farm would be clearly seen from the AONB and would be visually intrusive in the setting. A number of streams that feed into the Great Stour cross or border the proposed mineral sites. Many of these streams are likely to contain the white tailed crayfish which is protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

Kent Downs AONB The site is within the setting of the Kent Downs. The western part of the site to the north west of Chapel farm which due to its contours faces the Kent Downs scarp, and the proposed haul route onto the A20, are particularly visible form the Kent Downs scarp and the North Downs LDR.

Kent Wildlife Trust Object- The site is adjacent to Lenham Heath and Chilston Park LWS. This is a particularly diverse site with acidic and neutral grassland, important riverside marginal vegetation and parkland. There is a small area of ancient woodland within the site and part of the water system that feeds the LWS runs through site 76. Com- mon lizards, grass snakes and slow worms are present within site 76. The LWS contains a rookery.

RSPB The site includes an area of ancient woodland, Roughet Shaw Wood, to the north of the site. The furthering of this site would therefore have an adverse impact on this wood. Ancient woodland cannot be replaced through translocation or restoration.

Protect Kent Rejection recommended, due to: severe long-term impacts on landscape and biodiversity; impacts on neighbouring residents; proximity to historical interests; visual impact from the AONB; its impact on PROW’s Operator Brett Group- Support-The source of aggregates is from a known geological deposit, of known quality, which has served the local construction markets for many years. It benefits from established links to the local highway network. It is proposed to restore the site to a lower level and return it back to an agricultural after use.

General Public Responses -Devalue properties- Noise, light pollution and vibration- What will the hole be filled with?- Heavy traffic- Loss public footpaths- -Loss/impact on Ancient Woodland, AONB, SNCI and site of historic interest- Road safety issues- Impact on animals protected within the UK BAP- Cumulative impact of many past, present and future developments - Mess being left on roads- Weight limit on Tile Lodge Road- No proven need- Rose Lane is unsuitable for access-Damage to hedgerows- Loss of Tourism- Equipment on site will attract criminal activity- Impact on water courses- Impact on horses stabled close by- Sig- nificant Iron Age and Roman findings on site.- Close to listed buildings and historic park.-Sand lizard may be found in the area- Bull Heath nature reserve in close proximity.

28 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 77- Total Responses 294

Burleigh Farm & Tile Lodge, Charing support 1

5.10 This site is a proposed extension to the existing Charing comment 6 Responses Quarry. The site is within close proximity to other existing permitted sites and other call for sites submissions. There is a Public Right of Way running through the centre of the site. object 287 (Responses include a resident petition of 201 signatures) 0 100 200 300 400

Responses Parish Council Charing- Noise. Smell. Security lights. Security. Dust - properties already suffer one or more of these. Within these sites there is archaeology from the Roman and earlier periods that, as yet, many have not been investigated. Maps from 1639 show chapels (2) and other buildings on site 77. The vehicle movements quoted for all sites do not take into account the ancillary vehicle movements necessary for all the sites. Damage to water courses that supply us and the Stour.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Strong planning policies will be required to protect underground sewers and/or water mains at the following sites. Within SWS waste water area and waste water infrastructure crosses the site.

Heritage Proposals for quarrying that affect the historic hedgerow and the setting of Listed Buildings, in particular Bur- leigh Farm and the ruined chapel, should not be permitted. Need a substantial buffer, with appropriate screening to protect the setting of the Listed medieval chapel remains and the Listed Building at Burleigh Farm. Ac- cess from the site and into Charing Heath Road is likely to have unacceptable impacts on hedgerows if passing places are required.

Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species and Local designated site within 1km.

Highways KHS have concerns about accessing the site from Charing Heath Road owing to width restrictions. The access onto the A20 could also be an issue as the speed limit of the road in this location is 60mph.

29 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Environment Agency We have concerns about allocations at these sites. Any development would destroy watercourses, and potentially disrupt natural drainage downstream.

Charing Heath Action Group This site is part of the planning application that was submitted by Lafarge 10 years ago-rejected by KCC and won on Appeal. The reasons for refusal remain the same. Activity in this area could cause problems with the water table. In addition it could damage the fragile ecosystem of the Great Stour. Burleigh is a historical site with Roman and Middle Ages Archaeology. The site also has a railway embankment running the length of its northern boundary which is constantly being built up due to slippage. Kent Wildlife Trust No objection to the excavation of this site. It is agricultural land and so is unlikely to contain high biodiversity value and is not in the locality of any designated sites. There is a small pocket of woodland on the adjacent site which should be retained and protected.

Charing Archaeological Group There is a ruined scheduled chapel. A map dated 1639 shows a number of buildings around the chapel. No investigation of the extent of the site. Immediately outside the east end of Site 77 is Tile Lodge Farm which was the centre of a thriving 17th Century tile manufactory. RSPB It would be important to ensure there were no negative impacts on the nearby Ancient Woodland sites, including Burleigh Wood and Charing Heath Wood. We would encourage a limitation on the number of habitats restored, and suggest that restoration to dry acid grassland or a wetland habitat. Operator Brett Group-Support- - The source of aggregates at Charing Quarry is from a known geological deposit, of known quality, which has served the local construction markets for many years. It also benefits from established links to the local highway network. The proposed extension is required to provide the existing plant site with contiguous sand and gravel to continue to feed the demand from the local construction market. It is proposed to restore the site to a lower level and return the site back to an agricultural after use.

General Public Responses -The site was refused previously- Burleigh Farm is shown on a 1639 map as having 8 buildings and a chapel on it-Hook Lane is too narrow for HGVs-The railway bridge is already in need of repair- Risk of contamination and pollution of the water supply.- Increased noise levels- Dust, light and smell- Ad- verse impact on flora and fauna- Close proximity to residential housing.- Additional buildings and plant to be built on the sites- Loss of public access to the countryside.- Adjoins an AONB- Will attract pests and vermin- Would all cause a reduction in prime agricultural land.- No proven need identified- Damage to Lanes, Hedgerows and Buildings from passing HGVs- Impact on property values- Danger to pedestrians

30 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 97- Total Responses 12

Shrine Farm support 2

5.11 This site is bordered by the M20 with access straight comment 5 Responses onto Junction 11. The site is adjoined by the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, areas of Ancient Wood- land and Postling Wents Woods Site of Nature Conservation object 5 Importance.

0246

Responses

Parish Council Stanford PC- Object- The site is close to and overlooked by the Kent Downs AONB. Bartolomew Wood at Postling Wents is a site of registered environmental interest. The removal of sand from all around will cause unsustainable damage to the biological and hydrological context, altering its entire ecology. Access to the site must be from the B2068. This is heavily used and has insecure foundations. The site is good farmland producing well at a time when the need for 'home-grown' food is being promoted.

Postling PC- Object- It is adjacent to the Kent Downs AONB and will be extremely detrimental to views from the escarpment. We are very concerned about the environment impact with important species such as water voles being present close to the site. We are also concerned that the river Stour will be affected badly with the excavations which will go below the current river level. We have further concerns about traffic.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area.

Entec UK Ltd (for National Grid)- We require that no permanent structures are built over or under cables or within the zone specified in the agreement, materials or soil are not stacked or stored on top of the cable route or its joint bays and that unrestricted and safe access to any of our cable (s) must be maintained at all times.

Biodiversity Local designated site within site. European and UK protected species within 1km.

31 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Heritage Has a high potential for the presence of important archaeological remains. Further archaeological assessment including field evaluation is necessary prior to a planning decision. Development should consider and avoid any impact on the setting of the Postling Conservation Area.

Kent Wildlife Trust Object- This site is adjacent to Postling Wents Wood LWS designated for its ancient woodland. This quarry would abut the LWS blocking migration from the south and west. There are also two smaller ancient woodland pockets that would be impacted with connectivity severed between these sites and the LWS. As the boundaries are drawn up to the perimeter of these sites there would be likely to be extensive root damage to the ancient woodland blocks. Kent Downs AONB Right on the edge of the Kent Downs AONB which surrounds it on 2 sides. Very visible against back drop of the AONB as well as from the AONB and represents a major degradation and cumulative erosion of the setting. Landform means it cannot be hidden. This would take the plan period to work out, involve a new plant, and not be available for future alternative uses for decades. The Kent Downs object to this site being allocated for mineral extraction due to its impact on the setting of the adjacent AONB. Furthermore here are no stated restoration proposals. Inclusion in the figures for soft sand could be misleading due to the unknown life, output and start date.

RSPB It would be important to ensure there were no negative impacts, for example hydrological impacts, on the adjacent Ancient Woodland sites and on the adjacent Postling Wents Woods SNCI. The restoration of this site presents opportunities to link the fragmented areas of Ancient Woodland, thereby increasing their resistance to change.

Protect Kent Rejection recommended, due to: the number of unknowns; the lack of clarity on output; the size of the site; its significant impact on the setting of the AONB, and visual intrusion; its impact on adjacent SNCI; its impact on adjacent Ancient Woodland; its proximity to the village of Stanford; its proximity to a number of sites with Des- ignations; the impact on a number of public rights of way which cross the proposed site; the loss of prime agricultural farmland.

Woods Under Threat The site boundaries of this proposed site surround Butcher Wood, Perry Wood on 3 sides and Bartholomew Wood. Without significant buffering, in excess of 100 meters there will be a severe negative indirect impact on these three woods.

Planning Consultancy Bidwells Consultancy- Support- The site comprises in the main of arable fields adjoining ancient woodlands and a field of permanent pasture. The restoration will be sympathetic to the existing land uses and complement the Kent Downs landscape and the adjacent AONB. PROW access across the site will be preserved, though it is anticipated Temporary Diversion Orders may be sought, so that there is best use of the natural resources.

32 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

6 Sharp Sand and Gravel Sites for Consideration

Site 2- Total Responses 5

Beltring Green Farm support 0

6.1 This is an extension to the existing Arnolds Lodge Farm comment 4 Responses Quarry. J Clubb Ltd are currently working the area to the north of this site and transporting the mineral via a conveyor over the River Medway to the processing plant. The operator object 1 intends to use the same transportation method for this site. The site is adjacent to a Site of Nature Conservation Interest. 012345

Responses

District/ Borough TMBC-Land within MGB, open countryside and liable to flood risk.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area.

Heritage As development could potentially affect buried archaeological deposits a programme of archaeological evaluation and mitigation should be implemented. Development should consider and avoid any impact on the setting of the listed buildings to the north west though these may be screened by the A228 and the Industrial Estate.

Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species within the site. Local Site designation within 1km of site.

33 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways HGV Route located along A228 Banbridges Road. Only development to date is at the Public House south of the site

Kent Wildlife Trust Object to excavation within all these sites as they are adjacent to The Stoneham and The Lees LWS Hale Street Ponds and Pastures LWS and East Peckham Ponds LWS. There is a complex pattern of ditches and streams including the Tudley Stream. These features are important to the health of the freshwater habitats contained within the Local Wildlife Sites.

RSPB It would be important to ensure there were no negative impacts, for example hydrological impacts, on the nearby Ancient Woodland sites SNCI. We welcome the proposed restoration, however would encourage a limitation to the number of habitats restored.

34 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 3- Total Responses 6

Arnolds Lodge Farm West support 0

6.2 This site is an extension to the existing Arnolds Lodge comment 4 Responses Farm Quarry. The material can be taken by HGV to the existing processing plant. However, there is also the option to build a conveyor under the Hale Street bypass using the cul- object 2 vert which already exists.

012345

Responses District/Borough TMBC- Site identified for compensatory flood storage which relates to the Somerfield service centre to the south of the site. Land within the MGB, open countryside and liable to flood risk.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Strong planning policies will be required to protect underground sewers and/or water mains at the site. Within SWS waste water area. SWS wastewater infrastructure crossing site.

Heritage A programme of archaeological evaluation and mitigation should be implemented in advance of extraction work starting. The proposed mineral extraction of this site may have an impact on the setting of a number of Listed Buildings which lie adjacent. Prior to permission for extraction, the impact of the proposals upon the Listed Buildings should be fully assessed and mitigation measures undertaken.

Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species within the site. Local Site designation within 1km of site.

Highways HGV route located along A228 Boyle Way. No planned highway improvements.

35 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Kent Wildlife Trust Object to excavation within all these sites as they are adjacent to The Stoneham and The Lees LWS Hale Street Ponds and Pastures LWS and East Peckham Ponds LWS designated for their freshwater habitats the Beult and Medway rivers, streams and wet habitats of woodland fen and grassland. Within the proposed sites and the locality there is a complex pattern of ditches and streams including the Tudley Stream. We welcome the proposed mitigation of ponds reed beds and wetland but are concerned this will not mitigate the impact on the water bodies.

RSPB We would encourage the number of end-uses to be limited for this site, so that the success of any one end- use is not compromised by the others. Restoration to wetland habitat would be suitable considering the location of this site near to the River Medway. The restoration success would be increased if the existing Arnold Lodge Farm Quarry was restored to a wetland habitat also.

36 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 4- Total Responses 8

Woodfalls Farm support 0

6.3 This site is an extension to the existing Arnolds Lodge comment 5 Responses Farm Quarry. The material will be barged up the River Med- way to the Arnolds Lodge Farm processing plant. The site is located adjacent to two Sites of Nature Conservation Interest. object 3

0246

Responses

District/ Borough Maidstone BC- Object- Concerned that development at this site would have a negative impact on the ecology at the site and its surrounding area. Flooding impact is also the subject of concern, particularly the potential loss of flood storage that would result from quarrying at this site.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Objects- On the grounds of proximity to its waste water treatment works, unless appropriate planning policies can be agreed which protect the works and safeguard their continued operation and future expansion. Heritage A programme of archaeological evaluation and mitigation should be implemented in advance of extraction work starting. If the World War II pillbox is found to lie within the site then this should be avoided by the minerals working and left preserved. The proposed mineral extraction of this site may have an impact on the setting of a number of Listed Buildings which lie close by on the east. The impact on the setting of the scheduled Twyford Bridge and the amenity of the Yalding Conservation Area should also be assessed.

Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species within the site. Local Site designation within site.

37 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways There is already an access for goods vehicles to the Woodfalls industrial estate on this section of road. Lad- dingford and villages to the east of the site are protected by a 7.5 tonne weight restriction, the only access route is from the A228 Hale Street Bypass. No capacity problem. Adequate visibility splays at the site access are needed.

Environment Agency A watercourse runs through the site which may be an important habitat for protected species, and also borders the main River Medway. There would need to be considerations on the water table and how development would impact it.

RSPB We welcome the proposed restoration, however would encourage a limitation to the number of habitats restored. The proposed reed bed would be a suitable restoration on this site particularly considering the location of the site next to the River Medway. Further, this site is in the Medway and Low Weald Wetlands and Grass- lands BOA, which advocates wetland habitat creation.

38 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 5- Total Responses 141

Filston Lane support 0

6.4 This is a previously unworked site located to the south of comment 4 Responses Shoreham Village. The site is located within the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. object 137

0 50 100 150

Responses District/Borough Sevenoaks DC- The site has no planning history. The site is in the Green Belt and adjacent to area Tree Pro- tection Order’s. It partly lies in a flood zone 2. Parish Shoreham - Objection- Access problems and the particular unsuitability of Filston Lane for heavy traffic- Im- pact on the River Darent and flooding- Proximity of school and dwellings- Historical and archaeological connections to the site- Impact on local businesses- Use as a fieldwork destination for schools-Importance as a long standing water meadow

Dunton Green- Objection on grounds that the existing road network is not suitable for HGV’s. Utility Companies Southern Water-Not assessed as outside supply area Heritage Has a high potential for the presence of important archaeological remains. Further archaeological assessment including field evaluation is necessary. The water management system on the site is historic and a feature of the landscape which may contribute to the significance of the Scheduled Monument at Filston Hall. Impact on this water management system should be avoided. The proposals may have an impact on the amenity of the Shoreham Conservation Area.

Biodiversity UK and local protected species within site. European protected species within 1km. UK and Local designated sites within 1km. Highways Not suitable for extended or increased use due to poor highway access from rural lane network.

39 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Environment Agency This site lies adjacent to the River Darent and some of the drainage channels that feed it in Shoreham. We would object to any proposals that would deteriorate the River Darent through either a loss of water during summer months or would harm or risk deterioration of the ecological status of the waterbody Natural England This is a new site within the Kent Downs AONB. There is no history of gravel workings in the area and therefore this site would have significant impacts on the landscape and tranquillity of the AONB. Natural England would have serious concerns if this site was taken forward.

The Quadrangle Trust Objection-Site 5 is an heritage asset of high cultural, historical, archaeological and wildlife interest. The Otford Society Objection-Congestion on A225. Danger to pedestrians-absence of pedestrian crossings. The site is within the Green Belt and an AONB. Darent River Preservation Society Objection-AONB and Greenbelt. May increase risk of flooding. Excavations may cause river to leach. The Shoreham Society Objection- Great House Meadow dates back to 1190. Kent Downs AONB- Previous applications refused- Conservation Area. Tree Preservation Order-Impact on Dwellings and Community- Views of Site-Highway Issues- Paths-Biodiversity-River Darent and Valley- Flooding-Ground Water Vulnerability.

CPRE Object- Directly in an AONB- Archaeological interest- Tourist destination-Views onto the site from popular walks-Houses very close to the site on the west, south and east sides-Close to a primary school and pre school-50 yards from Church Street Conservation Area- No proper access to the site.

Kent Wildlife Trust No objection to this site being excavated. The site is near to the River Darent with many of the ditches feeding into the river. Needs to be an appraisal on the impacts. We welcome the proposed restoration to wildlife conservation and biodiversity and recommend that this reflect the ecology of the Darent River system.

RSPB We support the proposed restoration to wildlife conservation and biodiversity. This site is within the Central North Downs BOA which advocates the restoration of Filston Lane natural floodplain habitats and species rich neutral grassland.

General Comments -Inspired the arts: Samuel Palmer and William Blake-Popular for countryside walks -Local Wildlife may be disrupted-AONB, Metropolitan Green Belt, Ancient Woodland and SSSI designations-River Darent- home to much wildlife-Could increase flood risk-The Quadrangle is enjoyed by many-Currently area is farmed according to Countryside Stewardship-Possible Roman remains-The prevailing wind would carry pollutants through Shoreham-Single track road not suitable for HGV’s.-PROW could be affected- Popular tourist destination-May cause traffic through village-Proximity of housing and schools and 40 listed buildings-Conflicting with Sevenoaks LDF-Impact on horse riders-Noise, Dust, Light and Vibra- tion-May put pedestrians at risk-Concerns the site may be used for landfill after use.-Could adversely affect local economy-Impact on property prices

40 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 17- Total Responses 9

Moat Farm support 0

6.5 This site is located in an area with several existing permit- comment 5 Responses ted sites and call for sites submissions. The site has a public footpath crossing the western half of the site and is located north of the South Downs Area of Outstanding Natural object 4 Beauty.

0246

Responses District/Borough TMBC- This site is located in an area with several existing permitted sites and call for sites submissions. The site has a public footpath crossing the western half of the site and is located north of the South Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Parish Council Capel PC-The council thinks that further investigation of Moat Farm should be carried out as the consultation lacks sufficient data on this site.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS wastewater area. Heritage The proposed mineral extraction of this site may have an impact on the setting of Listed Buildings and in particular that at Moat farmhouse. Prior to permission for extraction, the impact of the proposals upon the Listed Buildings should be fully assessed and mitigation measures undertaken to avoid impact on their setting. In terms of potential impact on buried archaeological remains, quarrying should be possible on areas of this proposal site but would need to be accompanied by archaeological measures.

Biodiversity Local protected species within site. European and UK protected species within 1km of site. Local designated site within 1km.

41 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways HGV route along B2017 and A228.

Environment Agency This site has the potential for nature conservation value following restoration. The existing watercourses on the site should be taken into consideration through the allocation process. The text incorrectly identifies the South Downs AONB as being nearby.

Natural England The extension of the mineral workings to the south east of the existing Stonecastle Farm Quarry brings the workings closer to the boundary of the High Weald AONB and may impact on the setting of the AONB. The workings and restoration would need to suitably phased to minimise any visual impacts.

The National Trust The Northern tip of this site contains small area of ancient wood. In addition to this there is a small area of ancient woodland adjacent to the site. Development of this site will result in the loss of and damage to ancient woodland.

Kent Wildlife Trust Within the locality of East Tonbridge Copses and Dykes and River Medway LWS designated for its freshwater and river habitats, wet woodland and grassland. Providing hydrological investigations were carried out to ensure no impact on the LWS, safeguards were put in place to preserve the health of the water system and restoration was to wetland and dyke habitat KWT would not object to quarrying within this site.

RSPB This site would be suitability restored to wetland habitat. It currently has a number of streams or drains running through the site, including the Alder Stream and the Hammer Dyke. Further, this site is in the Medway and Low Weald Wetlands and Grasslands BOA. This site is south of an adjacent quarry, Stonecastle Farm which is being restored to wetland habitats. By restoring to wetland habitat also, this site will help contribute to a larger wetland complex which will function better ecologically.

Woods Under Threat The northern tip of this site contains a small area of ancient wood. In addition to this there is a small area of ancient woodland adjacent to the site. Development of this site will result in the loss of and damage to ancient woodland.

General Public Responses Ancient Wood within boundary

42 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 25- 65

Ham Farm (WITHDRAWN) support 0

6.6 This site is located to the north of the existing Faversham comment 1 Responses Quarry. The minerals will be transported to and processed at the existing processing facility. The site is located within a Ramsar, SPA and SSSI site. object 651 (Responses include a petition of 616 signatures from the neighbouring listed pub) 0 200 400 600 800

Responses District / Borough Swale- The Council conditionally object as the Council would need to be (a) satisfied that there would be no significant effects upon the SPA/RAMSAR; and (b) that any adverse landscape impacts could be minimised/ mitigated. It could also have potential landscape impacts. It is assumed that the stability of the sea wall would not be undermined. However, if it was deemed that this site was essential to meet the needs of sand and gravel across Kent then the Council feel that this site would be preferable over the other sand and gravel sites in.

Faversham Town Council– Considers that these sites identified in the Framework Consultation are totally unsuitable for inclusion in the Plan because of their status and would urge Kent County Council to remove these two environmentally important and sensitive sites from the Plan. Utility Companies Southern Water-Within SWS waste water area.

Heritage The proposed minerals site has a high potential for the presence of important archaeological remains. Further archaeological assessment including field evaluation is necessary. The proposed mineral extraction of this site may have an impact on the setting of Listed Buildings and in particular those at Ham Farm and Ham Farm Cottages. Prior to permission for extraction, the impact of the proposals upon the Listed Buildings should be fully assessed and mitigation measures undertaken to avoid impact on their setting. Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species within site. European and UK designated site within site, Local designated site within 1km.

43 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Environment Agency Object- There would be serious concerns for any allocation at this site, due to the wetland sensitivities. Natu- ral England will comment further on its importance as part of the SPA/Ramsar and SSSI.

Natural England Both these sites are within the Swale SPA, Wetland of International Importance under the Ramsar Convention (Ramsar Site) and SSSI. Sand and gravel extraction will damage or destroy the Ramsar features on site and significantly disturb the SPA bird interest. The inclusion of these sites would not meet the requirements of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, nor will it meet the test of soundness under PPS12.

Kent Wildlife Trust As identified within the SA these sites are within an extremely sensitive area with a plethora of national and international designations associated with the Swale Estuary. They are in very close proximity to two of our sites Oare Marshes and South Swale. We appreciate that the restoration plans incorporating shallow water bodies and ditches may improve this area for wildlife but the loss of grazing marsh habitat is likely to be too high a cost. RSPB Object-These sites form part of The Swale Estuary and Marshes SPA/Ramsar site. Direct land take from the SPA/Ramsar site will have a significant adverse effect on the SPA. While we agree with the finding of the Sus- tainability Appraisal we do not believe that mitigation is possible. Further, we do not agree with the conclusion that this effect would be negated by the progressive working of the site. We expect this site to be thoroughly appraised as part of the HRA. Only in the absence of alternatives and where there are imperative reasons of overriding public interest could such a proposal go ahead.

Protect Kent Object- Rejection recommended, due to: the site is designated as SSSI, SPA, Ramsar; impacts on adjacent Scheduled Monuments; impact on public right of way; potential access difficulties. Owners Support- Brett have been working with their Consultants, to make sure that all relevant data is being gathered so far as the ecology of the area is concerned. It will be necessary to engage with Natural England to talk about the most appropriate method of any extraction. Brett's consultants feel there is an opportunity to actually enhance the quality of this part of the marsh through careful consideration of the way in which the work is done. This Reserve offers the opportunity of winning a reasonably substantial amount of aggregate within a reasonably small surface area . It is difficult to imagine a site that could in these terms be more "sustainable" involving a very short distance back to the Plant site, and much of that route could probably be accommo- dated within private land.

General Public Comments -616 objections from patrons of the Shipwrights Arms- -protected as an SSSI and designated RAM- SAR-People who use a near by boat yard will be disrupted-The marsh harbours and is a breeding ground for vulnerable and endangered flora and fauna- Also used as a base for migratory birds.-The local pub relies on passing trade in the summer from walkers on the marsh.-A considerable area between two critical waterways, Faversham Creek and Oare Creek would be affected-Noise-Special Pro- tection Area under the EC Birds Directive. -Negative impact on tourism-Will take many years for the site to recover-Used for leisure activities such as dog walking and bird watching

44 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 26- Total Responses 678

Hollowshore support 1

6.6 This site is located to the north of the existing Faversham comment 3 Responses Quarry. The minerals will be transported to and processed at the existing processing facility. The site is located within a Ramsar, SPA and SSSI site. object 674 (Responses include a petition of 616 signatures from the neighbouring listed pub) 0 200 400 600 800

Responses District /Borough Swale- The Council conditionally object as the Council would need to be (a) satisfied that there would be no significant effects upon the SPA/RAMSAR; and (b) that any adverse landscape impacts could be minimised/ mitigated. It is assumed that the stability of the sea wall would not be undermined. However, if it was deemed that this site was essential to meet the needs of sand and gravel across Kent then the Council feel that this site would be preferable over the other sand and gravel sites in Swale.

Utility Companies Southern Water-Within SWS waster water area. Heritage Has a high potential for the presence of important archaeological remains. Further archaeological assessment including field evaluation is necessary. May have an impact on the setting of Listed Buildings the Shipwright Arms and at Ham Farm. The impact of the proposals upon the Listed Buildings should be fully assessed. The proposed allocation site should include a substantial buffer around the Shipwright Arms.

Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species within site. European and UK designated site within site, Local designated site within 1km.

45 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways Access from Ham Road would be problematic, due to its single track nature with lack of passing places. Planned road improvements- Ham Road/Priory Row junction-alterations to kerb line. Faversham Foundry/ Oare Road-New traffic signalled junction to serve housing development on site of former Faversham Foundry. Environment Agency There would be serious concerns for any allocation at this site, due to the wetland sensitivities.

RSPB Object-These sites form part of The Swale Estuary and Marshes SPA/Ramsar site. Direct land take from the SPA/Ramsar site will have a significant adverse effect on the SPA. While we agree with the finding of the SA we do not believe that mitigation is possible. Only in the absence of alternatives and where there are imperative reasons of overriding public interest could such a proposal go ahead. Natural England Within the Swale SPA, Wetland of International Importance under the Ramsar Convention and SSSI. Sand and gravel extraction will damage or destroy the Ramsar features on site and significantly disturb the SPA bird interest. There are alternative sites and the inclusion of these sites would not meet the requirements of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010. Kent Wildlife Trust As identified within the SA these sites are within an extremely sensitive area with a plethora of national and international designations associated with the Swale Estuary. They are in very close proximity to two of our sites Oare Marshes and South Swale. We appreciate that the restoration plans incorporating shallow water bodies and ditches may improve this area for wildlife but the loss of grazing marsh habitat is likely to be too high a cost. Protect Kent Rejection recommended, due to: the site is designated as SSSI, SPA, Ramsar; impacts on adjacent Sched- uled Monuments; impact on public right of way; potential access difficulties. Landowner Support- The source of aggregates at Hollowshore is from a known geological deposit, of known quality, which has served the local construction markets for many years. It also benefits from an existing mineral processing plant on the adjacent site at Faversham Quarry. Faversham Quarry has excellent and established links to the local highway network. The designation does not preclude mineral extraction and if carefully managed, the restoration of the site following mineral extraction will offer a better and more bio-diverse environment.

General Public Response -616 objections from patrons of the Shipwrights Arms- -protected as an SSSI and designated RAM- SAR-People who use a near by boat yard will be disrupted-The marsh harbours and is a breeding ground for vulnerable and endangered flora and fauna- Also used as a base for migratory birds-The local pub relies on passing trade in the summer from walkers on the marsh-A considerable area between two critical waterways, Faversham Creek and Oare Creek would be affected-Noise-Special Pro- tection Area under the EC Birds Directive. -Negative impact on tourism-Will take many years for the site to recover-Used for leisure activities such as dog walking and bird watching

46 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 49- Total Responses 11

Land North and South of Hammer Dyke support 1

6.7 This site is a proposed extension to the existing Stone- comment 5 Responses castle Farm Quarry. There is a series of Public Rights of Way running through the site. The site is located close to the northern boundary of the South Downs Area of Outstanding object 5 Natural Beauty. The area has many existing permissions and call for sites submissions. 0246

Responses

District/ Borough Tunbridge Wells- Need details regarding the proposed increase in operations compared with those existing; estimated vehicle movements. Parish Council Capel-Object- The council is opposed to any development of the Hammer Dyke Site because of its serious impact on the landscape and amenity of the northern part of the Parish which would be completely dominated by such a proposal.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS Waste Water Area

Heritage Further assessment of the potential impact of proposals in this area on the historic landscape and its surviving features is necessary to determine whether quarrying of this site is appropriate. The proposed mineral extraction of this site may have an impact on the setting of Listed Buildings and in particular those at Sherenden Farm, Lilley Farm and Tudeley Hale. In terms of potential impact on buried archaeological remains, quarrying should be possible on areas of this proposal site but would need to be accompanied by archaeological measures.

Biodiversity UK and Local protected species and Local designated site within site. European protected species within 1km.

47 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways Poor access roads on to rural lanes.

Environment Agency There would be concerns about impacts on the Hammer Dyke and the vast number of other waterbodies found across this site. Parts of the proposal are too close to Hartlake Abstraction, which is a significant potential constraint.

Natural England The extension of the mineral workings to the south east of the existing Stonecastle Farm Quarry brings the workings closer to the boundary of the High Weald AONB and may impact on the setting of the AONB. It is important that the workings and restoration are suitably phased to minimise any visual impacts.

RSPB Support the proposed restoration to wildlife habitats, however would encourage a restriction to the number of end-uses and habitats. We agree with the conclusion of the Sustainability Appraisal. This site would be suitability restored to wetland habitat. It currently has a number of streams or drains through the site, including the Alder Stream and the Hammer Dyke.

Kent Wildlife Trust Covers an extensive area and incorporates many of the dykes and ditches that feed East Tonbridge Copses and Dykes and River Medway LWS. The LWS is designated for its freshwater and river habitats, wet woodland and grassland. Incorporates a number of blocks of ancient woodland. Although we welcome the habitat re-creation proposed we feel that it is likely that the impact on the LWS would be too great to be viable.

The National Trust Object- This site contains ancient woodland within the site boundary. This woodland is not identified in the information supplied by KCC. There are three additional blocks of ancient woodland adjacent to this site. De- velopment of this site will result in the loss of and damage to ancient woodland.

Protect Kent Object- Rejection recommended, due to: visual impact from the AONB; severe impact on local roads by HGVs; impacts on public rights of way; the size of the site and lack of proposals on phased use.

Woods Under Threat The site contains ancient woodland within the site boundary. There are three additional blocks of ancient woodland adjacent to this site. Development of this site will result in the loss of and damage to ancient woodland.

Land Agent RH and RW Clutton-Support-This is a large landholding in single ownership and a great opportunity exists for some imaginative environmental restoration once the mineral is worked out.

48 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 71- Total Responses 9

Stonecastle Farm Quarry support 1

6.8 This is an extension to the existing Stonecastle Farm comment 6 Responses Quarry. The site is within close proximity to other permitted sites and call for sites submissions. The area is located to the north of the South Downs Area of Outstanding Natural object 2 Beauty.

02468

Responses

District / Borough TMBC- The area of the site that lies within the TMBC boundary area lies within the MGB. This is an extension to the existing Stonecastle Farm Quarry.

Parish Council Capel- Has no objection to the extension of the existing Stonecastle Farm site, subject to restoration and environmental safeguards.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area.

Heritage Further assessment of the potential impact of proposals in unquarried areas of this site on the historic landscape and its surviving features is necessary to determine whether quarrying of such areas is appropriate. The proposed mineral extraction of this site may have an impact on the setting of Listed Buildings. In terms of potential impact on buried archaeological remains, quarrying should be possible on areas of this proposal site but would need to be accompanied by archaeological measures.

Biodiversity Local and UK protected species and Local designated site within site. European protected species within 1km.

49 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways HGV route along A228.

Environment Agency There would be concerns about impacts on the Hammer Dyke and the vast number of other waterbodies found across this site. Similar to Site 17 there is potential to enhance these watercourses and make restoration proposals positive for nature conservation.

Natural England The extension of the mineral workings to the south east of the existing Stonecastle Farm Quarry brings the workings closer to the boundary of the High Weald AONB and may impact on the setting of the AONB. The workings and restoration should be suitably phased to minimise any visual impacts.

RSPB Covers an extensive area and incorporate many of the dykes and ditches that feed East Tonbridge Copses and Dykes and River Medway LWS. The LWS is designated for its freshwater and river habitats, wet woodland and grassland. Incorporates a number of blocks of ancient woodland. Although we welcome the habitat re-creation proposed we feel that it is likely that the impact on the LWS would be too great to be viable.

Protect Kent Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment, and provided that: proposed restoration is agreed and conditioned beforehand; inert fill is imported for restoration purposes only.

Kent Wildlife Trust Object- Serious concerns regarding the impacts of the proposed quarrying of this site in combination with site 49 and possibly site 17. We would be even more concerned if the proposed restoration were to include the import of foreign inert landfill as this would be likely to impact still further on the water and wetland habitats.

Woods Under Threat The site contains two separate but adjacent blocks of ancient woodland within the north east extremity of the site. They are not identified on KCC maps.

50 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 73- Total Responses 45

Lydd Quarry support 1

6.9 There are five parcels of land proposed as extensions to comment 5 Responses the existing Lydd Quarry which spans across the county border into East Sussex. The site is currently adjoining an SAC and a SSSI. The adjacent gravel workings have been the sub- object 39 ject of a designation upgrade from SSSI to provisional SPA and provision Ramsar. 0 1020304050 (Responses include an e-petition with 21 signatures) Responses District/Borough Lydd Town Council- Object- Over the years we have had extensive removal of shingle from the Marsh area and this has created many large bodies of water. We believe this process has created an increased flood risk to our Parish whilst giving no benefit to the communities it effects. Concerns have also been raised over evaporation. These large bodies of water, through evaporation, could increase the risk of saline intrusion and this in turn gives rise to worries over the quality of our drinking water drawn from aquifers on the marsh. Fur- ther concerns about the affects on farming activities both in crop irrigation and animal husbandry, as well as the general wildlife. Utility Companies Entec UK (for National Grid) - National Grid does not object to the proposals outlined. National Grid does not own the land over which the overhead lines cross, and it obtains the rights from individual landowners to place our equipment on their land. Potential operators of the sites should be aware that it is National Grid policy to seek to retain our existing overhead lines in-situ because of the strategic nature of our national network. Statu- tory electrical safety clearances must be maintained at all times. Heritage As quarrying could potentially affect buried archaeological deposits a programme of archaeological works should be implemented in advance of development. The proposed quarrying of this site may have an impact on the setting of the Listed Building at Tourney Hall. Biodiversity UK and Local protected species and UK and Local designated sites within site. European protected species and European designated site within 1km.

51 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways Forms part of an existing mineral extraction site, unclear as to what scale this operates at present and where the current points of access are located. There is a significant amount of residential settlement close by. The roads leading to and including Lydd High Street are also relatively narrow and would not be suitable for large scale HGV movements. The ongoing development proposals at Lydd Airport could have impact on capacity.

Environment Agency There is a high chance that protected species will inhabit the watercourses found in the area of Lydd. If this is the case any proposals would have to retain these features. Natural England In this area of the SSSI the interesting feature is the buried geomorphology. Natural England's previous advice on sites in this area was that we would not object to their inclusion provided that the Plan would make it ex- plicit that any application to extract minerals from these areas should be preceded by an assessment. Current Government policy is that these have the same protection as Natura 2000 sites.

Kent Wildlife Trust We acknowledge the biodiversity gains that could be achieved from the proposed creation of open water bodies; however there is a high risk that bird disturbance and disturbance of flora, invertebrate and amphibian species for which Dungeness, Romney marsh and Rye Marshes SSSI and SPA is designated could be ir- reparably impacted by the proposed excavation. There would need to be much more detail regarding how impacts could be mitigated and how other valuable habitats could be retained, restored or recreated.

RSPB Object- This site falls within the Dungeness, Romney Marsh and Rye Bay SSSI and potential SPA.. It is Gov- ernment policy to treat SPAs as if they were already designated and as such SPAs are fully protected under the Habitats Regulations 2010. We expect this site to be thoroughly assessed as part of the HRA and put forward only in the absence of alternatives.

Protect Kent Object- Rejection recommended, due to: the site is designated as SSSI, potential SPA, potential Ramsar; impacts on adjacent residential properties and amenity; impact on public right of way; potential access difficulties; impacts on residential roads by HGVs.

Operator Brett Group- Support- The source of aggregates at Lydd Quarry is from a known geological deposit, of known quality, which has served the local construction markets for many years. It also benefits from established links to the local highway network. Discussions have been on-going with Natural England regarding the possibility of mineral working in this area, these have indicated that any mineral working should be proposed in such a way, that it only affects a small part of the total area of the SSSI at any one time.

General Public Response -Dust and Noise- Devaluation of property -The site adjoins existing housing estates and potentially adjoins 3 intended housing developments-Designated SSSI-Danger of subsidence for existing and future housing developments -Lack of return value to Lydd town from similar sites in the past– There is an active e-petition with 20 signatures.

52 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

7 Crushed Rock Sites for Consideration

Site 07- Total Responses 201

Hermitage Quarry Westerly Extension support 1

7.1 This site is a proposed extension to the existing Hermit- comment 3 Responses age Quarry. The site currently extracts ragstone and is one of two sites contributing to the current Crushed Rock reserves in the County. The site already has the processing facilities and object 107 equipment, which would also be used during the working of this proposed extension. The proposed site is designated as Ancient Woodland. 0 50 100 150

Responses

District/ Borough TMBC- The site is designated as a LWS.

Maidstone BC- Object- The Council do not want this woodland and the ecology it supports to be compromised and is dissatisfied that there is a current, overriding and demonstrable need for material that cannot be met elsewhere.

Parish Council Teston PC-object- It is an inappropriate site. If included in the new plan it would effectively give “agreement in principle” for Oaken Wood to be quarried.

Barming PC- Object- No proven need for ragstone.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area.

Heritage The site is presently the subject of detailed discussions and a planning application. Archaeological assessment has been carried out and further measures should be secured through a condition on any planning consent granted. Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species within the site. Local Site designation within site.

53 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways HGV route off of B2246 Hermitage Lane. Potential for a cycle lane to be installed along the length but nothing confirmed to date. Recently submitted application – TM/10/2029.

Natural England Objection Natural England has an outstanding objection to the current planning application on this site due to the loss of ancient woodland and the inadequacy of the proposed mitigation/compensation package.

Kent Wildlife Trust Objection- KWT has opposed the quarrying of this site throughout the application process. The proposals would lead to a direct loss of ancient woodland which is effectively irreplaceable. Added to this, the site is designated as a LWS for its ancient woodland habitat and as such should be protected. The draft Core Strategy does not identify a need for crushed rock within the plan period.

RSPB The RSPB objects to this site option. This site is within an area of ancient woodland and a local wildlife site (SNCI). The proposed site therefore has an adverse impact on these sites. The site should not be permitted without consideration of alternatives, and the provision of evidence for why the development is absolutely necessary. Should the site be permitted it should be restored to native woodland as proposed.

Woods Under Threat Object-Identified as ancient woodland. The current application will directly destroy 32.53 ha and indirectly impact/fragment a further 120 ha of ancient woodland. This is an acceptable loss.

Operator Gallagher Aggregates- Support- Hermitage is a highly productive unit, has established infrastructure and a known market and has no nature conservation or other constraints of international importance General Public Response -The ancient woodland is irreplaceable- Would destroy habitats- Crushed rock supply can be met through existing planning permissions-Contravenes central government planning policies around bio-

diversity and geological conservation (PPS9 and MPPS1)-The woodland offers both economic and en-

vironmental health to an area for many generations-Ancient woodland has different soil properties

which cannot be replaced.-It is home to protected species under EU legislation-bats, hedgehogs, dor-

mice and badgers-Air borne dust particles are a known side effect of quarrying-Noise from quarry

would be disruptive-Within a SNCI-The tree stock would take decades to return to its former glory-

People use the woodland for leisure activities: dog walking, bike riding, walking, jogging, children

playing-Used to educate children about wildlife and horse riding.

54 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 78- Total Responses 14

Richborough Underground Limestone Mine support 3

7.2 This proposal is for the extraction of underground lime- comment 7 Responses stone in the Richborough area through the use of deep mining technologies. Working would take place underground and be processed on a part of the site. When developed, the site object 4 would contribute very large volumes of crushed rock. The site will be under a Local Wildlife Site and the entrance is in close proximity to a Ramsar site. 02468

Responses District/ Borough Dover- Object- The entire site is within a LWS. It has a PROW parallel to its northern boundary, crossing and into the site. Considering restoration would take some years to be effective the visual amenity from these rights of way would be severely impaired. The process would involve above ground technology and processing which would create a great deal of dust, noise and traffic pollution impacting the adjacent sewerage works, agricultural activities and the quality of life for the villagers of Ash. Richborough Castle could suffer from the effects of vibration. Unearthed archaeological remains may be within the site.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Strong planning policies will be required to protect underground sewers and/or water mains. Within SWS waste water area. Within SWS water supply area and water supply infrastructure crossing site.

Heritage The development of surface facilities and access in this area is likely to have a significant impact on the historic environment. Should the underground proposals have an effect on the water table / hydrology in the allu- vial deposits then this would potentially affect archaeological remains. Any proposals for development in this area should include an assessment of the potential effects on the historic landscape.

Biodiversity UK and Local protected species and Local designated site within site. European protected species and Euro- pean and UK designated site within 1km.

55 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways Likely to be adequate HGV capacity, a Transport Assessment may be required. Access to the site is unclear however a new junction onto Sandwich Road (A56) in close proximity to the roundabout would not be acceptable and should be linked directly to it. The site falls within the area included within the East Kent Access

Natural England Close to Sandwich Bay to Hacklinge Marsh SSSI, Sandwich Bay SAC, Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA and Ramsar Site. Insufficient information to assess whether there would be an impact. Could be impacts to SPA Birds displaced from habitats on site. These would need to be fully evaluated in an EIA and HRA. Also in-combination impacts to consider with other proposed sites around Richborough.

Kent Wildlife Trust As identified within the Sustainability Appraisal this site is within a LWS and adjacent to a Ramsar site. There are also SPA and SSSI designations concurrent with the Ramsar designation. The Core Strategy does not identify the need for further crushed rock within the plan period and therefore we question the need to allocate this site. The information provided within this document is not detailed enough to enable us to assess the impacts of this development on either the LWS or the European designations. RSPB The site entrance is adjacent to the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA/Ramsar site, Sandwich Bay SAC and Sandwich Bay to Hacklinge Marshes SSSI. As such this option must be thoroughly assessed as part of the HRA to ensure that the site does not have a significant adverse effect on these sites. The site is also a local wildlife site (SNCI). It should be ensured that the mine does not negatively impact upon the site, for example through hydrological changes. The National Trust This large scale proposal would be likely to have significant impacts on the hydrology, drainage and nature conservation interest of the site and adjacent protected sites. Further assessment of the likely environmental impact and potential for mitigation should be undertaken. Protect Kent Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment, and provided that: traffic management issues are fully addressed. However, selection of this site may be superfluous. Operator/ Agent Brett Group-Support- The profile of the pre-deposition syncline surface indicates that limestones are nearest the surface along the northern edge of the syncline in the Richborough to Chislet area. Further and more detailed geological investigations will be required. Due to the dip of the strata, the southern area of the proposed site may prove to be the wettest. The location of this mine, would mean that transporting to this area would be significantly cheaper than importing aggregate. The possibility of using nearby rail sidings will greatly reduce the amount of external road traffic. Once mining has ceased virtually no evidence of mining should remain.

Lee Evans Planning- Support- The Inert Materials Processing Facility will be supplemented by a Soil Wash- ing Facility and an Anaerobic Digestion Plant to deal with green and food waste. The potential environmental impact was assessed through the EIA undertaken as part of the Planning Application. Given the proximity to the land adjoining the Weatherlees Waste Water Treatment Works indicates that potentially technical and environmental issues can be appropriately dealt with on the new site.

56 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

8 Silica Sand Sites for Consideration Site 24- Total Responses 5

Land North of Addington Lane support 2

8.1 The site is a proposed extension to the existing Addington comment 5 Responses (Wrotham) Quarry. The site is within the Kent Downs Area Of Natural Beauty and contains Folkestone beds sand. The upper sands are intended for building sand and the lower de- object 2 posit is suitable for use as industrial sand (silica sand). This site can also be found in 5.4 Soft Sand Sites for Considera- tion. 0246

Responses

District/ Borough TMBC- The site is within the Kent Downs AONB and contains Folkestone beds sand. The upper sands are intended for building sand and the lower deposit is suitable for use as industrial sand (silica sand).

Utility Companies Southern Water- within SWS waste water area.

Biodiversity European Protected Species within site. UK and Local protected species within 1km of site. UK and Local designated sites within 1km.

57 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Natural England Site within Kent Downs AONB. Whilst this site is an extension of an existing quarry it extends the operation to the north of Addington Lane and potentially opens up the possibility of extending quarrying operations eastward. The Council will need to be satisfied that the site meets the "exceptional circumstances‟ required under PPS7.

Protect Kent Object- Rejection recommended, due to: site being within the Kent Downs AONB; cumulative landscape and visual impacts; proximity to SNCI and Ancient Woodland that is already impacted by quarrying in the vicinity; impact on public rights of way.

Kent Wildlife Trust This site is within 86m of Ryash Wood LWS designated for its ancient woodland. 29 ancient woodland indicators have been recorded within the woodland and the site's ecological health is dependant on its hydrology being damp in nature. Although we do not object to this site being excavated, attention should be given to protection of the LWS from the impacts of dust and other pollutants. Hydrological impacts should be examined. We recommend that the site is buffered.

Kent Downs AONB The Kent Downs AONB object to the sand working. Similar objections therefore apply to filling.

58 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 62- Total Responses 303

Newlands Farm, Charing support 1

8.2 Newlands Farm is located near Charing village. The site comment 3 Responses borders another submitted site. The geology of the site is Folkestone Bed sand and the site will provide both building sand and silica sand. There is a Public Right of Way running object 299 across the northern area of the site. The site is also in 5.5: Soft sand Sites for Consideration. (Responses include a resident petition of 201 signatures) 0 100 200 300 400

Responses Parish Council Charing- Object- Noise. Smell. Security lights. Security. Dust - properties already suffer one or more of these. Within these sites there is archaeology from the Roman and earlier periods that has not been investigated. Maps from 1639 show chapels and other buildings on site 62. Damage to water courses that supply us and the Stour. Sites can be viewed from AONB and SLA.

Little Chart– Object- it will have an adverse effect on the local road network - already struggling with heavy goods traffic. One has to wonder if planners look at these issues cumulatively

Utility Companies Southern Water- Strong planning policies will be required to protect underground sewers and/or water mains at the following sites.

Heritage Likely to have an impact on the setting of the Grade II Listed Buildings at Newlands Manor. Would impact directly on the site of the V1 explosion. Any disturbance of this site would need to be permitted through MOD.

Biodiversity European and local protected species within site. UK protect species and local designated site within 1km. Highways There are pinch points in Charing village where the road narrows to less that the required width for two HGVs to pass safely. Hook Lane could be widened to allow access for HGVs.

59 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Charing Archaeological Group The area of Site 62 is sufficiently important nationally for there to be a moratorium on further inclusion of these in the MWDF proposals. Protect Kent Rejection recommended, due to: no obvious access to the site; severe impacts on Charing village and surrounding communities due to traffic; impact on adjacent SNCI and nearby Ancient Woodland; impact on historic features and interests in the neighbourhood; impact on public rights of way; potential visual impact on views from the AONB.

Charing Heath Action Group It is not clear from the proposals how access can be achieved to either of these sites . A tributary for the river Stour runs under this site that would cause pollution to fish and wild life that require clear water for survival. Site 62 contains a modern historic site where 52 servicemen died during WW2. RSPB Consideration would be required to impacts on local biodiversity. We welcome the proposed restoration, however would encourage a limitation to the number of habitats restored. Kent Wildlife Trust This site is adjacent to Hurst Wood LWS which is designated for its ancient woodland and sand pit habitats. The health of the woodland is dependant on the damp soils within the site. The disused sand pit has been colonised by a number of rare flora and invertebrate species. General Public Responses -World War II special site- 52 soldiers died there-Vibration-Could damage building foundations-Noise

and Scale-Public Safety: Areas with no pavements-Health Hazard: Spread of silica dust-Potential dam-

age to watercourses -Affect on property values-Smell may attract vermin-Not enough room for two

lorries to pass each other-Hedgerows along the A20 are rich in species-Already an accident black stop

along Pluckley Road-Mess may be left from vehicles along the road-Site can be viewed from the North

Downs AONB and SLA-Footpath would be lost-Could pollute a tributary to the River Stour-Reduction

in agricultural land-Altering the course of the stream could lead to flooding-No proven need identified-

Loss of a community- There may be Roman remains on this site

60 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

9 Chalk Sites for Consideration

Site 16- Total Responses 275 Responses Beacon Hill Quarry support 1

9.1 This is an existing site producing chalk for agricultural lime. The operator would like to extend the depth of the cur- comment 4 Responses rently permitted quarry. The site is within the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and is adjacent to a Site object 270 of Nature Conservation Importance.

(Responses include a resident petition of 201 signatures) 0 100 200 300

Responses Parish Council Charing- Object- Noise. Smell. Security lights. Security. Dust - properties already suffer one or more of these. Within these sites there is archaeology from the Roman and earlier periods that has not been investigated. Damage to water courses that supply us and the Stour. Sites can be viewed from AONB and SLA.

Heritage The old lime kilns and their immediate surrounding or setting should be avoided by and protected from any development or quarry works. Such development could potentially affect buried archaeological deposits including remains of industrial archaeological interest. In these areas a programme of archaeological works should be implemented in advance of development.

Biodiversity There is a UK and Local Designated site within the site. There are European, UK and local protected species within 1km of site.

Highways The access to the site is an existing one from Charing Hill and then Pilgrims Way. This is already an existing Chalk Pit. There is little traffic along Pilgrims way so Kent Highway Services cannot foresee any issues with this site. There are no planned improvements or planned developments likely to impact on road capacity.

61 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Kent Wildlife Trust This site is adjacent to Charing Beech Hangers SSSI which is designated for its beech and oak ancient woodland and rare flora and fauna species including a number of rare invertebrates. The SSSI is not identified within the Sustainability Appraisal. Although the site has been put forward for deepening only we have concerns that further excavation will impact on the rare flora and fauna. As identified within the SA this site is also adjacent to Longbeech Wood Charing LWS designated for its ancient woodland. Parts of the LWS are within the site itself. Kent Downs AONB Any intensification and prolonging the life of this site without major improvements to the access would be unacceptable. The rural lanes in this part of the AONB and the presence of the Pilgrims Way/North Downs LDR would mean any improvements and changes to the access would be resisted by the AONB unit. The mention of the potential access route to the A262 is not understood.

RSPB This site falls within the Kent Downs AONB, and includes some ancient woodland, a local wildlife site (SNCI), and forms part of the adjacent Charing Beech Hangers SSSI. The Council should ensure that the irreplaceable ancient woodland around the perimeter of the site does not get destroyed by altering the boundary of the site to avoid this habitat. It should also be ensured that the site does not have negative impacts on the adjacent SSSI, the local wildlife site or the ancient woodland. This site should be restored to native woodland to complement the adjacent habitat.

Charing Archaeological Society A listed hill top track way of Roman origin is shown on the historic environment record. This is threatened by a proposal in the Sustainability report to access the quarry from the A252. Lowering the depth could destabilise the northern face of the quarry and destroy the beacon site. The north east face of the quarry is already unsta- ble being without terracing.

Woods Under Threat The site contains ancient woodland. Mapping evidence indicates that this site has already resulted in the loss of ancient woodland. Further expansion would cause additional loss of and damage to ancient woodland. General Public Responses -Scale along with other proposed sites in Charing-Existing country lanes too narrow and already in poor condition-Public Safety-Pedestrians often have to walk on the road where there is no pavement-

Noise Pollution from traffic-Potential Damage to watercourses and aquifer-6 dwellings nearby use

bore holes for their drinking water-Will change the character of Charing-Chalk is non renewable and

we should try and conserve it-Used by walkers-Would disrupt the local community-Within the Kent

Downs AONB and close to ancient woodland-Excavation will leave a pit which will be difficult to land-

scape-Will affect horse riders and walkers who use Pilgrims Way-The site has geological and fossil

interest-Concerns it maybe used for landfill after use-Lack of established need

62 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 56- Total Responses 5

Hegdale Quarry support 0

9.2 This is an existing site which extracts chalk for use as ag- comment 2 Responses ricultural lime, yard chalk and constructional fill. The site is within the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. object 3

01234

Responses Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area.

Heritage No archaeological measures are necessary in connection with the proposals. Development should consider and avoid any impact on the setting of the Listed Building at Hegdale Farmhouse

Biodiversity European and UK protected species and local designated site within 1km.

Highways The access to the site is an existing one from the A251 (which is a lorry route) KHS cannot therefore foresee any issues with this site. There are no planned improvements or developments.

63 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Natural England This is within the Kent Downs AONB. While an existing quarry consideration needs to be given to whether it is appropriate to extend the life of the quarry given its sensitive location. Given the location within the AONB we would question the acceptability of increasing activity by processing inert and excavation waste.

Kent Wildlife Trust Site 56 is within the locality of ancient woodland and it will be important within the proposed processing of inert and construction waste that there is no pollution of the ancient woodland. Kent Wildlife Trust has no objections to the proposed plans provided the above safeguards are included in any permission granted.

RSPB It would be important to ensure there were no negative hydrological impacts on the adjacent Ancient Wood- land sites and on the adjacent Postling Wents Woods SINC. Restoration of this site should complement the adjacent Ancient Woodland, as such restoration to native broadleaf woodland would be appropriate. In addition, it should be ensured that the treatment of waste does not negatively affect the adjacent Ancient Wood- land. Protect Kent Object- Rejection recommended, due to: a very sensitive site, in the middle of the AONB, adjacent to Ancient Woodland; distance from sources of construction waste. Note: we believe the site should be restored as soon as possible, in line with the existing permission.

64 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 63- Total Responses 9

Pinden Quarry support 0

9.3 This is an existing chalk extraction site and a landfill site comment 4 Responses for asbestos waste. The proposal includes an extension to the north west and deeper excavation of the existing quarry. The site is adjacent to a Site of Nature Conservation Interest. object 5

0246

Responses

District/ Borough Dartford-Within Green Belt, Area of Archaeological Potential, Windturbine Development Safeguarding. Sub- ject to HSE Inner Consultation, Area of Transco Pipelines and HSE Middle Consultation Area of Transco Pipe- lines. National Grid Transition Gas Pipeline Consultation Zone. Smoke Control Order-Bean. Public Right of way on Western Boundary. There is no evidence that additional capacity beyond that already consented needs to be identified.

Parish Council Southfleet-Object The Parish Council considers the inclusion of the Pinden proposed future options in the Kent MWDF to be detrimental to the future of the surrounding area for the reasons given above; and asks KCC that they not be included.

New Barn East-Object -Would create too many lorry movements, Would have a detrimental impact on local lanes and villages-Impact many residential properties

Utility Companies Amec UK Ltd-National Grid- The site is located within close proximity to one of National Grid’s high pressure gas transmission pipelines.

65 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Heritage Bronze Age, Iron Age and Roman remains have all been found during past investigations at Pinden Quarry. Remains include evidence of Roman occupation and burials.

Biodiversity UK and Local protected species and Local designated site within 1km.

Kent Wildlife Trust This site is adjacent to Disused Railway Cutting Longfield LWS. However the LWS is restricted to the railway cutting and the proposed extension is to the north wesr of the existing quarry and therefore should have no impact on the LWS. However KLIS shows that the proposed extension is within woodland. Although not ancient in origin it will be important to endeavour to preserve as much of this habitat within the proposal and any lost should be replaced.

RSPB It would be important to ensure there were no negative impacts on the adjacent local wildlife site (SNCI), including hydrological impacts. Restoration of this site should complement the adjacent local wildlife site. This site is near the Thames-side Green Corridors BOA, which recommends restoration to acid grassland, heathland and species-rich neutral grassland.

66 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

10 Brickearth Sites for Consideration

Site 19- Total Responses 47

Paradise Farm support 0

10.1 This site for the extraction of brickearth will be worked comment 3 Responses once a year for a six week extraction campaign. Restoration will progress with the working of the site. The site is south of the Swale Ramsar and SPA, as well as north east of a SAC object 44 and the Kent Downs AONB. There are Public Rights of Way through the site. 0 1020304050

Responses

District/ Borough Swale BC- The Council object due to the potential impact on the AQMA in Newington and the noise and dust pollution to nearby residential properties. It could also have potential landscape impacts. It would also require access on to a rural lane. Swale Borough Council declared an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) number 1 in Newington in March 2009 and this specifically covers the A2 road through the village. The AQMA was declared as a result of monitoring the air quality which was found to exceed the Air Quality Objective for Nitro- gen Dioxide (NO 2 ). Any access into Bull Lane would not be acceptable. Parish Council Newington-Object- Paradise Farm is some 800m away from the Newington AQMA . It is safe to assume that the majority of the 8,000 annual HGV movements will be through the Newington AQMA. Paradise Farm at its Eastern end borders 3 important community areas. The village recreation ground, Newington allotments and Newington Community Woodland. Paradise Farm shares a common boundary with a residential estate.

Bobbing-Object- Bobbing Parish has approximately 150 households in Keycol Hill, Rooks View and Bobbing Hill that would suffer directly from any such development. They would be directly affected by any additional HGV lorries using the A2. The road is narrow and has no footpath on the south side. Any additional traffic being directed to use the Key Street roundabout would In fact compound the already over used and often grid locked Key Street roundabout. Social hours operation should be imposed. Monday to Friday 8 to 5. All residents fronting the A2 will suffer a deterioration in their quality of life. Have KCC consulted Rainham residents ?

Upchurch-Object- It will add additional vehicle lorry movements onto the A2. Other environmental impacts on Upchurch are likely to be slight and need to be carefully considered for Newington residents.

67 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area. Within SWS water supply area. SWS water supply infrastructure crosses site.

Heritage As quarrying could potentially affect buried archaeological deposits a programme of archaeological works should be implemented in advance of development. The proposed mineral extraction of this site may have an impact on the setting of Listed Buildings and in particular that which lies on the Lower Hartlip Road. Prior to permission for extraction, the impact of the proposals upon the Listed Buildings should be fully assessed and mitigation measures undertaken to avoid impact on their setting.

Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species within 1km of site.

Highways Bull Lane would be considered inappropriate to serve as the access route from the A2, and similarly, Wormdale Road from the old A249 (Maidstone Road) is mostly a narrow single track road with few passing places. Kent Wildlife Trust As identified within the SA this site is within the locality of Queendown SAC. Impacts on the SAC will need to be considered within the HRA however there is a good buffer and therefore direct impacts are unlikely. More concerning is the level of traffic movements stimulated by the excavation of brickearth. As a chalk downland site Queendown Warren is sensitive to nitrogen deposition from increased traffic emissions. It will be important to ensure that appropriate mitigation is provided to ensure no harm to the SAC's calcareous habitats and species. We would suggest that part of this mitigation be to restore the site to calcareous grassland managed for biodiversity. We recommend in-combination impacts are considered within the HRA.

RSPB We would encourage restoration of this site to biodiversity, for example species rich grassland could be created. Should the restoration be to agriculture as proposed, biodiversity gains should still be included, for example areas of species rich grassland and ponds.

General Public Comments -Newington High Street and Bull Lane not suitable for HGVs-Road Safety-Noise, exhaust and dust pollution-Damage caused to orchards and other rural environments-Traffic concerns in Spade Lane-

Badger Setts close by-Protected under the Badger Protection Act 1992-Its eastern end borders 3 im-

portant community areas- the village recreation ground, Newington Allotments and Newington Com-

munity Woodland.-Close to Hartlip Conservation Area-Impact on local businesses-Doubts over

whether there is a need for the site-Loss of high quality agricultural soil-May impact on public footpath

68 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 92- Total Responses 3

Land at Bax Farm support 0

10.2 This site promoted for the extraction of brickearth is comment 2 Responses south of the Ramsar, SPA and SSSI site located around the Swale River. object 1

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Responses

District/ Borough Swale BC- object- The Council object to this site given the lack of information on length of operation and estimated reserve. Poor access and visual/amenity constraints are considered as overriding factors for an objection. Consideration will be required to mitigation to reduce any impacts on residential amenity of site excavation and poor access across/under the railway. The site is to the south of the Ramsar, SPA and SSSI. There is a possible wider visual impact from the north which would need adequate mitigation.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area.

The proposed quarrying at this site may have an impact on the setting of the Listed Buildings at Bax Farm. The impact of the proposals upon the Listed Buildings should be fully assessed and mitigation measures undertaken to avoid impact on their setting. As a minimum a substantial buffer should be maintained, with appropriate screening around Bax Farm to protect the setting of the Listed Buildings.

Biodiversity UK and Local protected species within 1km of site.

69 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways Access along Lower Road, and either Hempstead Lane, Frognal Lane or Station Road is likely to be inappropriate for regular movement of HGVs, being relatively narrow over considerable lengths of the routes, and with restricted junctions to negotiate.

Kent Wildlife Trust This site is some distance away from the Swale Ramsar site and therefore Kent Wildlife Trust does not envis- age any impacts on this site. However we recommend in-combination impacts with other sites within the area are considered within the HRA. There are no ecological constraints on this site.

RSPB We would encourage restoration of this site to biodiversity. Considering the presence of drains close to this site, restoration to wet grassland could be suitable. Should the restoration be to agriculture as proposed, biodiversity gains should still be included, for example species rich hedges and ponds.

70 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

11 Clay Sites for Consideration Site 60- Total Responses 3

Norwood Quarry & Landfill Extension support 0

11.1 This is an existing site extracting London Clay and haz- comment 2 Responses ardous waste landfill, in particular the flue ash from the Alling- ton energy from waste incinerator. There are two possible site extensions promoted: one to the east and one to the object 1 north of the existing site.

00.511.522.5

Responses

District/ Borough Swale- The Council conditionally have no objection to this site as it will utilise existing infrastructure and access and it will provide a needed supply of London Clay. Need to ensure adequate mitigation for traffic movements and impacts on visual/residential amenity. The site should be restored once it closes. The northern extension is a more viable option than the eastern one due to potential landscape impacts. The Council would object if proposals were shown to increase traffic levels above current volumes.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area and SWS water supply area.

Heritage Could have archaeological implications and should be assessed prior to determination. The north of the present quarry has already been assessed. Further archaeological measures can be dealt with through a condition on the planning consent.

Biodiversity UK protect species within site and European and Local protected species within 1km.

71 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways Prolonging the existing operations at this site are likely to be acceptable. An increase in HGV activity would need to be assessed. Planned road improvements Barton Hill Drive/ Lower Road Junction-upgrading of traffic signal junction to MOVA control. Windmill Quay Road/Lower Road-widening of junction. Planned developments- Grain store and drying facility at New Hook Farm.

Kent Wildlife Trust No objection to the proposed extension to the above site. Woodland is present within the extension. This should be conserved if possible and if lost should be replaced within the restoration. We welcome the aim to restore some of this site to woodland and ponds.

RSPB The restoration should limit the number of habitats restored. Lowland meadow would be an appropriate restoration for the site. Restoring both the existing quarry and its extension to the same habitat would increase the success of the restoration. Should part of the restoration be to agriculture as proposed, biodiversity gains should still be included.

Protect Kent Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment.

72 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

12 Mineral Import Sites for Consideration Site 1- Total Responses 6

East Peckham Rail Depot support 0

12.1 East Peckham Rail Depot is an active import site. The comment 6 Responses site is operational, having the benefit of a temporary planning permission. The proposal is to make this site into a permanent facility. object 0

02468

Responses

District / Borough TMBC- Land within the MGB, open countryside and liable to flood risk. East Peckham Rail Depot is an active import site. Utility Companies Southern Water- Object- Proximity to its wastewater treatment works, unless appropriate planning policies can be agreed which protect the works and safe guard their continued operation and future expansion. Strong planning policies will be required to protect underground sewers and/or water mains at the site.

Heritage Development of this site with a rail depot is unlikely to cause additional archaeological impact on buried deposits unless remnant gravel and Brickearth deposits are removed. If that is the case then further assessment and archaeological investigation and recording may be appropriate. Development should avoid any impact on the pillbox to the south and consider any impacts on the setting of the Listed Buildings in Hale Street and Branbridges.

Biodiversity European Protected species, UK protect and Local protected species within the site. Local Site designation within 1km of site.

73 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways HGV route located along A228 Boyle Way. No planned highway improvements. No proposed developments.

Kent Wildlife Trust As identified within the SA this site is adjacent to Stoneham and The Lees LWS. This site contains important assemblages of aquatic and marginal vegetation, invertebrates and bird species. Consideration should be given to ensuring the protection of the ancient woodland and that any further works needed do not alter the hydrology of the LWS. However we have no objections in principle to the operation of this depot.

CPRE Maidstone District Com- At the East Peckham Depot much flexibility is incorporated. Road transport for taking minerals out and bring- mittee ing minerals in. Rail siding has also been in use since the site opened to bring materials in and taking minerals out. Conveyors are used to move materials about on site. In a proposed extension to the site the use of River Transport is proposed. It also has to be mentioned this site has an assured water supply for washing purposes.

74 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

13 Secondary & Recycled Aggregate Sites for Consideration Site 8- Total Responses 166

Chelsfield Ammunition Depot support 1

13.1 The site will be used as a storage facility for high comment 4 Responses PSV stone road planings for recycling. The recycled stone will then be used to make new asphalt for new road surfaces. object 161

0 50 100 150 200

Responses District/Borough Sevenoaks District Council – Planning permission was granted for the use of the site for secure storage within Use Class D8. Parish Councils Dunton Green- Objection on grounds that the existing road network is not suitable for HGV’s. Shoreham-object– AONB– Green Belt– Ancient Woodland and Historic landscape– Harm to biodiversity and habitat– Increase in highway congestion– Increased dangers to residents– Proximity to properties– Light, dust and sound pollution.

Utility Companies Southern Water-Not assessed as outside supply area Heritage The site contains an ammunition depot/explosives research facility that dates back to the Second World war. The site has a close relationship with research facilities at nearby Fort Halstead. The site has features associated to its use during World War Two and The Cold War, which are likely to be of archaeological significance. Biodiversity UK Protect and Local species within site. European protected species within 1km. UK and Local designated sites within 1km.

Highways There is currently adequate capacity available on roads required by the site. No planned highway improvements. Fort Halsted redevelopment could impact upon the local highways, although this is unlikely.

75 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

8 Treatment/Materials Recycling Facility Natural England While part of this can be considered a Brownfield site the proposal could potentially further degrade the AONB in an area that is already under urban pressure. Any proposal would need to deal sensitively with boundaries to minimise visual impacts. Additionally, at least half of the site is ancient woodland. Care would need to be taken to avoid loss to this important BAP habitat.

Kent Downs AONB- This would be a permanent site. Restoration proposals mentioned presumably relate to restoration of the of the present ammunition site. There is no justification for locating this facility in Kent Downs AONB. The Kent Downs AONB Unit object to its inclusion as an allocated site in the M&W Core Strategy.

Kent Wildlife Trust This site covers a large area of the Woodlands West of Shoreham LWS designated for its ancient woodland and calcareous habitats. Ancient woodland is irreplaceable. Kent Wildlife Trust objects strongly to the allocation of this site as it will lead to the loss of a significant area of ancient woodland and have an irreversible impact on an LWS. Both ancient woodland habitat and LWSs are protected from impact under PPS9 paragraph 10 and 9 respectively. National Trust This site contains ancient woodland. The expansion of this site would result in the direct loss of and damage to ancient woodland.

Protect Kent Objection Lawful Development Certificate restricts storage to the bunkers on site.

Shoreham Society Objection – AONB. Development only under exceptional circumstances which have not been demonstrated.

Woods Under Threat The site is adjacent to ancient woodland-consideration must be given to the indirect impacts of waste facilities adjacent to ancient woodland.

Conway Ltd We chose to purchase the Chelsfield site as it offers us the same discreet yet accessible storage and distribution facility as enjoyed by the MOD since 1936. The 12 acre site is tucked away in a wooded area extending to over 50 acres. Access to the site is off the A224, some 1.5 miles from the access road to the M25 at junction 4. There is no congestion on the A224 before the M25 access road and Shacklands Road; the most traffic on the A224 is at weekends with visitors to the Pole Hill Garden Centre. There is, therefore, little to no impact on residential amenity. The landscape in terms of shielding is to be enhanced with the erection of a 10m wide x 5m high bund planted with trees indigenous to the area.

General Public Responses Green belt area-Site is within an area of Ancient Woodland, which is covered by Tree Preservation Orders. - Congestion on local lanes which would struggle to cope with any increased traffic use by heavy goods vehicles- Local roads do not have pavements and area used by children travelling to and from school.

76 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 12- Total Responses 29

Newington support 0

13.2 This site is an existing industrial estate located ad- comment 3 Responses jacent to a former extraction site for brickearth. The landowners have promoted the site for consideration for waste uses and to expand the site into the former object 26 brickearth areas. 0102030

Responses District/Borough Swale- The Council object to all the proposals for this site as even though part of the site is an existing industrial site, the proposal also includes some greenfield undeveloped land. If this site was allocated consideration would be required to mitigation to reduce any impacts on residential amenity of site operations and access. This is an existing industrial estate so whilst this would involve the loss of B class employment land/jobs, proposals could also create new jobs. Any increase of traffic in Newington could negatively impact the AQMA. Swale Borough Council declared an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) number 1 in Newington in March 2009 and this specifically covers the A2 road through the village. This is primarily due to the pollutant being emitted by motor vehicles using the constricted High Street. Heavy goods vehicles make a significant contribution and the Council is committed to reducing the pollutant, and hence the number of vehicles, particularly HGVs that use the road. If either of these sites were to come on stream as suggested in the framework, the lorry movements through the village of Newington which need to serve the sites will be completely unacceptable, considerably worsening the air quality to local residents.

Parish Councils Newington PC-Object- Newington High Street is the subject of a AQMA. The junction of the A2 with Bull Lane, if not the narrowest, then it is one of the narrowest points on the whole of the A2 from Dover to London. It is not possible for a HGV and a small car to pass each other at this point

Upchurch PC-Any of the possible uses would have environmental impacts for the Newington Residents- If the uses are permitted, assuming they replace activities already on site then traffic movements should be neutral.

77 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

8 Treatment/Materials Recycling Facility Utility Companies Southern Water: Strong planning policies will be required to protect underground sewers and/or water mains at the site. Within SWS wastewater area. SWS wastewater infrastructure crossing site. Within SWS supply area. SWS water supply infrastructure crossing site.

Heritage The proposal site lies adjacent to the A2 Watling Street which has its origins as the main London to Dover road in Roman times. The Roman road alignment is generally considered to fall to the south of the present line and may cross the site. Roman and later activity including cemetery sites is often found flanking the road. Brickearth deposits in the area may contain remains of Palaeo- lithic and Mesolithic date. Palaeolithic hand axes have been found north east of the site in New- ington.

The site has been in places previously quarried and developed though the full extent of impact from this is presently not assessed. Biodiversity UK protected species within site. European and Local protected species within 1km. Highways HGV capacity-unlikely to present too many issues, depending on the scale of the operations. It should be noted however, that Newington Air Quality Management Zone exists. Planned Develop- ments-Spade Lane, Upchurch- Expansion of existing B2/B8 commercial site. Kent Wildlife Trust No objections to the development of this site for the recycling and storage of waste.

RSPB We encourage restoration to biodiversity on this site, for example species rich grassland could be created. Should the restoration be to an industrial estate as proposed, biodiversity should still be included, for example by including ponds.

Protect Kent Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment, and provided that: development of the site is limited to the boundary of the existing industrial area; conditions are put in place to control HGV traffic movements through Newington; the route of the Public Right of Way crossing the site is re- aligned to the site perimeter, conditions are put in place to minimise or negate impacts on neighbouring residents. General Public Responses -Inadequate roads- lorries will not be able to pass each other along Newington High Street. -Air pollution already very high along High Street -Noise, smell and dust impacts on residents - Vibration from HGV’s -Currently used for grazing horses -Will have a negative impact on local businesses -Close to Badgers Setts: protected under the Badger Protect Act 1992

78 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 21- Total Responses 3

F M Conway, Rochester Way support 0

13.3 FM Conways have an existing site on the border of Dart- comment 3 Responses ford and the London Borough of Bexley. The site processes waste from roads and pavements to produce recycled aggregates use in asphalt for future road and pavement bases and object 0 surfaces.

01234

Responses

District / Borough Dartford DC- Within: Green belt, Groundwater Aquifer, Windturbine Development Safeguarding. Subject to: Smoke Control Order 5. Southern Gas Networks Gas Pipeline. Consultation Zone. Areas of Archaeological Potential. Wansunt Pit SSSI. HSE Middle Consultation Zone Transco, HSE Outer Consultation Zone Transco. Common Land abuts the sites eastern and southern boundaries. Housing at Braeburn Park, Bexley to the north. LB Bexley identify land adjacent to the site on north side as Site of Borough Importance for Nature Con- servation.

Heritage As development could potentially affect buried archaeological deposits a programme of archaeological works should be implemented in advance of development. This can be secured through a condition on any consent.

Biodiversity UK and Local protected species within site, UK designated site within site. European protected species and Local designated site within 1km.

Protect Kent Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment, and provided that: mitigation is completed in line with the Sustainability Appraisal

79 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Kent Wildlife Trust This site is adjacent to Wansunt Pit SSSI designated for its geology. Of ecological importance Dartford Heath LWS is opposite the site. If the recycling process is likely to release any element that will reduce the air quality in the area this may damage the heathland habitat within the LWS. In compensation for any reduction in the air quality from increased operations on this site we recommend that a contribution be made to the management of Dartford Heath LWS. In combination impacts with Site 11 within the Waste Sites Document will need to be considered.

RSPB It would be important to ensure that there were no negative impacts on the adjacent Wansunt Pit SSSI, part of which is included within the site boundary. Despite the permanent nature of this site, benefits for biodiversity could be included, for example through the inclusion of ponds, or areas to complement the adjacent SSSI or nearby woodland.

80 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 45 - Total Responses 5

Dunbrik Depot support 1

13.4 This is an existing builders yard and storage depot. This comment 3 Responses submission is a proposal to bring in waste inert soils and blend them with lime/cement to create aggregates. object 1

01234

Responses

District/ Borough Sevenoaks DC- Site is within the Green Belt, AONB and Flood Zone 2. The sustainability appraisal is considered to be appropriate in terms of the issues raised. Subject to the appropriate mitigation measures being put in place, to protect the amenities of residents and the character of the landscape, the District Council has no objection to the principle of this site being allocated.

Heritage Archaeology is unlikely to survive on the present site. The site lies between two Conservation Areas, Sundridge to the west (600m) and Chipsted to the east (450m). Archaeological measures are unlikely to be required on this site.

Biodiversity European and UK protected species within site. Local designated species and UK designated site within 1km.

81 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways Adequate capacity but impacted upon at times of congestion as a result of M25 traffic incidents. To the east Riverhead, Bat and Ball junction and Seal on the A25 are all AQMA listed.

Kent Wildlife Trust Kent Wildlife Trust has no objection to the waste inert soils providing there is no impact from pollution on the adjacent waterbodies within the disused pits.

Kent Downs AONB Even though the site classified as ‘brownfield site’ by the SA it was once a mineral site which should have been restored to its original use. The site is in the Kent Downs AONB so the proposal will be required to be assessed against all the Kent Downs Management Polices. Any proposals would need to show a high quality and sensitive landscaping, care of boundary treatment, and care and restoration of the adjoining site.

RSPB Despite the permanent nature of this site, benefits for biodiversity could be included, for example through the inclusion of ponds.

Protect Kent Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment, and provided that: mitigation is completed in line with the Sustainability Appraisal.

82 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 52- Total Responses 10

Weatherlees support 1

13.5 This site is located to the north of the existing Thanet comment 4 Responses Waste site and the proposed site North of Stevens and Car- lotti. The site is envisaged as a possible expansion of Thanet Waste processes and services later in the plan period. It is object 5 unknown at this stage what the site will be used for, it therefore being considered for a variety of waste uses. 0246

Responses

District/ Borough Thanet- Current planning application for change of use to a solar park. The land is not allocated for development in the adopted 2006 Thanet Local Plan. It is in a Landscape Character Area and Wantsum Flood Risk Area. It is close to the route of East Kent Access Road improvement scheme. Also in close proximity to Richborough Power Station and adjacent to Weatherlees Wastewater Treatment Works. Sandwich Town Council The council is aware that permission to erect solar array panels at the northern end of this site has already been agreed. There are concerns that emissions to air and water from the proposals will affect the performance and surface of these solar panels and will infringe the human rights of the owners. The Sustainability Appraisal is supported, particularly in relation to the adjacent SSSI and Ramsar sites, Special Proection Area and Nature Reserve. The area is also a flood plain. Utility Companies Southern Water-Object- On the grounds of proximity to its waste water treatment works, unless appropriate planning policies can be agreed which protect the works and safe guard their continued operation and future expansion.

Heritage As development of this site could potentially affect buried archaeological deposits a programme of archaeological works should be implemented in advance of development. This can be secured through a condition on any consent. Biodiversity UK and Local protected species within site. European protected species, Euro, UK and Local designated site within 1km.

83 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Natural England The site is adjacent to Sandwich Bay to Hacklinge Marsh SSSI, and close to Sandwich Bay SAC, Thanet- Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA and Ramsar Site. Concerns that this area is coming under increasing pressure from commercial activities. There are plans for an energy park on the Richborough Power Station site as well as waste processing. With no firm proposals for this site it is difficult to assess the impacts. The Council would need to consider the in-combination impacts that these sites will have on the interest features of the protected sites. Any application should be accompanied by an HRA.

The National Trust The location of this site in close proximity to the Pegwell / Sandwich Bay SSSI / SPA / SAC/ Ramsar site is such that further assessment is required to establish the likely extent of environmental impact and the scope for mitigation, prior to any allocation being made in the plan. RSPB This site is adjacent to Sandwich Bay to Hacklinge Marsh SSSI and is near the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA/Ramsar site. As such we agree with the conclusion of the Sustainability Appraisal. Consideration of impacts will need to be given to not only this site, but to this site in combination with the existing Thanet Waste Site, the proposed site North of Stevens and Carlotti and Richborough Underground Limestone Mine. A restoration plan should be proposed to restore this site to grassland which complements the adjacent SSSI. Kent Wildlife Trust This site is adjacent to Sandwich Bay to Hacklinge Marshes SSSI designated for its habitats, rare flora and fauna and migratory bird populations. It is within very close proximity to the Sandwich and Pegwell bay NNR, the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA and Ramsar site. This site also is designated as an SAC not mentioned within the SA description. The species which inhabit the marshlands are sensitive to pollution and changes in hydrology. Any decrease in water quality would not only affect the habitats present but could impact on food availability for and cause disturbance to migratory birds. KWT does not feel that these sites can tolerate any further pressure and therefore would object to any development within the locality likely to have an impact on the habitats and species. If this site is considered for allocation the HRA impacts should be thoroughly assessed with avoidance, mitigation and compensation measures detailed within the final Waste Sites DPD. If impacts cannot be avoided or mitigated then we recommend that this site be excluded from the plan.

Protect Kent Object- Rejection recommended, due to: the number of unknowns about this site; its proximity to a number of sites with environmental designations; the possibility of alternative sites to the south, on the former Pfizer site, having not been explored at this stage. Kent Ornithological Society Object- Adjacent to Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA ad Ramsar site. Designation of Pegwell and Sand- wich Bay as National Nature Reserve is incompatible with industrialisation of coastline. Migrating Shoebirds stop here to feed- this would stop if there was human disturbance. Operator / Owner Lee Evans Planning- We support the allocation of the land adjoining Weatherlees Waste Water Treatment Works for development for waste related uses as set out in the representations submitted by ourselves in Oc- tober 2010

84 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 56- Total Responses 4

Hegdale Quarry support 0

13.6 This is an existing site which extracts chalk for use as comment 2 Responses agricultural lime, yard chalk and constructional fill. The site is within the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. object 3

01234

Responses

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area.

Heritage No archaeological measures are necessary in connection with the proposals. Development should consider and avoid any impact on the setting of the Listed Building at Hegdale Farmhouse

Biodiversity European and UK protected species and local designated site within 1km.

Highways The access to the site is an existing one from the A251 (which is a lorry route) KHS cannot therefore foresee any issues with this site. There are no planned improvements or developments.

Kent Downs AONB The existing restoration and, landscaping schemes and requirements would need to be updated. The processing of inert and construction wastes should be tied to the progressive working of the site and have an end date. The whole site should ultimately be restored and not remain as an industrial site at odds with the AONB.

85 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

86 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 65 - Total Responses 11

Land North of Stevens and Carlotti support 3

13.7 This will be a mixed use site, working alongside the cur- comment 6 Responses rent Thanet Waste site at Richborough Hall, to the south of this site. This site will include an inert waste crusher, a screening and washing plant and an anaerobic digester plant. object 2 As part of the processes the site will take in construction, demolition and excavation waste. 02468

Responses

District/ Borough Thanet- Concern is raised regarding potential damage to the nearby internationally designated habitats and the perception of Thanet as an attractive destination both in terms of tourism and economic investment. Vehi- cle movements are of particular concern. It is noted that an application for transfer and construction of ex- panded inert materials facility including soil washing plant and anaerobic digester plant has been granted on Land North of Stevens and Carlotti.

Sandwich- There are no objections to the proposals for this site. Thanet Waste Services is currently manag- ing the site well. The Sustainability Appraisal is supported

Utility Companies Southern Water- Strong planning policies will be required to protect underground sewers and/or water mains.

Biodiversity UK and Local protected species within site. European, UK and Local designated sites within 1km.

87 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways There is adequate HGV capacity available on the adjoining road network for this site. The site falls within the area included within the Kent Access Phase which is under construction just to the north of the land.

Natural England The site is close to Sandwich Bay to Hacklinge Marsh SSSI, Sandwich Bay SAC, Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA and Ramsar Site. Concerns that this area is coming under increasing pressure from commercial activities. There are plans for an energy park on the Richborough Power Station site as well as waste processing. The development of this site would create a built barrier between the SPA, SAC and Ramsar and the Ash Levels and Richborough pasture LWS that potentially could be supporting SPA bird species. If the Council would need to consider the in-combination impacts of the various proposed sites. Any application should be accompanied by an HRA.

RSPB This site is in close proximity to the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA/Ramsar site, the Sandwich Bay SAC The National Trust The location of this site in close proximity to the Pegwell / Sandwich Bay SSSI / SPA / SAC/ Ramsar site is such that further assessment is required to establish the likely extent of environmental impact and the scope for mitigation, prior to any allocation being made in the plan.

Kent Wildlife Trust As stated within the SA this site is adjacent to Sandwich Bay to Hacklinge Marshes SSSI designated for its habitats, rare flora and fauna and migratory bird populations. It is within close proximity to the Sandwich and Pegwell bay NNR, the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA and Ramsar site. This site also is designated as an SAC. The habitats are sensitive to pollution of the coastal and marshland habitats and the species which inhabit them. Any decrease in water quality would not only impact on the habitats present but could impact on food availability for and cause disturbance to migratory birds as well as the rare flora and fauna species. We are already very concerned regarding the in combination impacts on Sandwich and Pegwell Bay from recrea- tional pressure and habitat destruction. KWT do not feel that these sites can tolerate any further pressure and therefore objects to any development within the locality likely to have an impact on the habitats and species. KWT is particularly concerned regarding the in-combination impacts of this development with the plans for sites 54, 64 and 52. It will be important within the HRA that impacts be thoroughly assessed. If impacts cannot be mitigated then we recommend that this site be excluded from the plan. This site is also adjacent to Ash Level and South Richborough Pasture LWS. There is an extremely rich biodiversity on site. We would object to any development that impacts on this.

88 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 72 - Total Responses 7

Unit 14 Canterbury industrial Park support 0

13.8 The site is proposed as a site producing secondary recy- comment 5 Responses cled aggregate. The site has also been promoted for use as a waste transfer station taking municipal and commercial & industrial waste plus inert and excavation waste. object 2

0246

Responses District/ Borough Canterbury City Council- There is an existing permission for use of land for storage and distribution of re- claimed building materials and erection of a building. This was granted in 2009 and is valid until 2014. Only part of the permission has been implemented. The Council would not support anything significant beyond this permission as this is adjacent to a sensitive site: Stodmarsh SPA /Ramsar/SSSI/NNR. Any intensification of use would require screening for Appropriate Assessment under the Habitat Regulations. The lower south western part of the site is also a LWS. This site also complements the adjacent highly important Stodmarsh site. Should this site progress then the boundary should be redrawn to exclude the LWS. Parish Council Westbere- Object- Wholly against any further development in Westbere for the taking of waste that no one else in the Canterbury area wants. Westbere already has the Viridor waste plant and the Ling Metals development - the effects of which are yet to be realised. An additional waste site would further detract from the SSSI land which already suffers from noise, smoke, dust and light pollution. The site would add to the number of lorries along the busy A28. These are not huge units, there would be inadequate room for lorries to unload and turn around. The parish council seeks to protect and enhance the SSSI for future generations. It is not clear what waste is being proposed for this site. Heritage The proposed minerals and waste site has a high potential for the presence of important archaeological remains. Further archaeological assessment including field evaluation is necessary prior to a planning decision to determine whether important remains are present and whether quarrying and development of this site is appropriate.

89 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Biodiversity UK and Local Protected Species and Local Designated site within site. European Protected species and Euro- pean and UK designated site within 1km.

Environment Agency Due to the close proximity to the Stodmarsh SPA/SAC, any proposed facility at this location would have to have an appropriate assessment in accordance with the Habitats Directive to determine whether its was likely to have an adverse effect on SPA/SAC.

Natural England This site would further extend the Canterbury Industrial Park towards the boundary of the Stodmarsh SAC, SPA, Ramsar and SSSI. Stodmarsh is important for its wetland habitat. It is sensitive to increases in noise and light pollution and impacts to hydrology. Further information is required to ascertain whether the proposed development will impact on interest features of the Natura 2000 sites and the SSSI, before it is taken forward.

Kent Wildlife Trust There is very important lichen heath habitat established on the part of the LWS within the site. This is the most ecological valuable part of the LWS. Kent Wildlife Trust has no objections to an aggregate recycling facility on the remaining parts of site 72. However, the Former Hersden Quarry LWS must be protected from harm or excluded from the site footprint. Of equal concern is the site's location adjacent to the Stodmarsh SPA, SAC Ramsar and SSSI sites. It will be important to ensure no pollution enters this important marshland habitat.

Protect Kent Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment, and provided that: impacts on neighbouring environmental designations are fully understood and conditioned; overlap with adjacent SNCI is excluded from the site; the full scope of waste processing activities are known, agreed and managed; levels of noise are quanti- fied. Regard also needs to be given re possible conflict with potential expansion of Hersden village.

RSPB This site is immediately adjacent to the Stodmarsh SPA/Ramsar site, SAC, SSSI and NNR. The site is also adjacent to, and includes part of, a SNCI. As outlined in the Sustainability Appraisal "part of the site incorporates a local wildlife site (SNCI) and the site lies to the north of a SPA/Ramsar site/NNR designation, which will warrant consideration to any impacts on biodiversity. We expect this site to be thoroughly assessed within the HRA to ensure no adverse effect on the adjacent designated sites. Further, since the life of the operation is "unknown", we suggest that a restoration plan may be relevant.

90 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 79- Total Responses 6

Tilmanstone support 2

13.9 This site is a former brickworks. The site would be comment 3 Responses viewed as an expansion to the operator's existing and proposed sites in the area. It is unknown at this stage what the site will be used for, it is therefore being con- object 1 sidered for a variety of waste uses. 01234

Responses

District/ Borough Dover- Existing industrial use, high unemployment area, potential economic benefits apparent and identified in core strategy. However the site has a poor road network and is close to residential areas. Pollution, noise and health risks would need further assessment. No objection but with caution.

Utility Companies Southern Water-Strong planning policies will be required to protect underground sewers and/or water mains.

Heritage The proposed waste allocation site has a very high potential for the presence of important archaeological remains in its north western quarter. Further archaeological assessment including field evaluation is necessary prior to a planning decision. Development should seek to maintain the line of the former historic railway cutting as a landscape feature which extends over much of the district. The railway has strong connections with the history of the Kent coalfields.

Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species and Local designated site within 1km.

91 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Kent Wildlife Trust Kent Wildlife Trust has no objections to an aggregate recycling plant on this site.

Protect Kent Object- Rejection recommended, due to: the number of unknowns about this site; the lack of clarity on specific uses; its distance from likely sources of waste; its proximity to the village of Elvington; the possible impact on the PROW along the southern boundary of the proposed site; the majority of the site being a Regionally Important Geological Site.

RSPB We would encourage restoration of this site to biodiversity, for example to woodland to complement the nearby Ancient Woodland.

92 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 80- Total Responses 7

Faversham Quarry support 1

13.10 There is currently an existing aggregate recycling facil- comment 5 Responses ity at this site as part of the existing quarry. The site is submitted as a proposal to make the aggregate recycling facility permanent taking C&D waste from Swale and other sur- object 1 rounding areas.

0246

Responses

District / Borough Swale- The Council conditionally have no objection to this site as it is making an existing facility permanent which would protect existing jobs. This is subject to assessment of transport and air quality impacts. It would need to be decided if it had a negative impact on the AQMA in Ospringe. There are potential landscape and biodiversity issues which will need mitigation measures. Local site access may be an issue if the number of lorries increases.

Utility Companies Southern Water- Within SWS waste water area

Heritage Given the present use of the site, further quarrying is unlikely to have significant archaeological implications. The proposed development of this site may have an impact on the setting of the Listed Buildings at the site though this is likely to be marginal. Prior to permission for development, the impact of the proposals upon the Listed Buildings should be fully assessed.

Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species and UK and Local designated site within 1km.

93 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways May depend on whether access is taken from Oare Road or Ham Road. Ham Road is narrow, and an increase in HGV movements from this site may be resisted. Planned road improvements-Ham Road/Priory Row junction-alterations to kerb line. Faversham Foundry, Oare Road- New traffic signalled junction to serve housing development on site of Faversham Foundry.

Kent Wildlife Trust Although this site is adjacent to the Swale SPA, SSSI and Ramsar sites and our reserve Oare Meadow KWT has no objections to the continuation of aggregate recycling facilities provided high environmental standards are undertaken to ensure no impact on the designated sites and appropriate mitigation is provided.

RSPB It would be important to ensure that this site does not negatively affect the nearby Swale SPA/Ramsar site. Despite the permanent nature of this site, benefits for biodiversity could be included, for example through the inclusion of ponds, or areas to complement the adjacent SNCI.

Protect Kent Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment

Operator Brett Group- Support- Faversham currently has the benefit of an IDO permission and an exemption from licensing for an aggregate recycling facility. The area will import in the region of 40,000 tonnes of construction and demolition waste for recycling. Traffic generated from this facility would be, on average, 7 loads per day. It is expected that HGV's bringing waste into the site for recycling will also be utilised for taking recycled material out of the site for delivery to construction/landscaping projects in the locality. This is in accordance with the existing operation. It is hoped that this will be a permanent facility, therefore restoration of the site and after- uses are not envisaged. The benefits of using recycled materials over new raw materials are clear and apparent.

94 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 81- Total Responses 5

Milton Manor Farm support 1

13.11 This site has an existing mineral processing plant and comment 3 Responses has a temporary permission for an inert waste transfer operation. The site proposal is to import construction and demolition waste from Canterbury district for recycling. object 1

01234

Responses

District/ Borough Canterbury City Council- There is an existing mineral processing plant which has a temporary permission for an inert waste transfer operation. It is adjacent to the Great Stour SNCI. It is also opposite the newly con- structed Riverside walk and cycle path. The site has a detrimental impact on the Stour Valley. The Landscape Appraisal identifies this as a sensitive landscape. There is a potential archaeological interest on the site which is situated in close proximity to a medieval manorial settlement, centred on Milton Manor and the Church of St John the Baptist. There is a potential for permanent loss of archaeological remains. The barn at Milton manor a little distance away is also Grade 2 listed. The City Council would not support a permanent facility in this location. A temporary facility may be acceptable when a more suitable location becomes available.

Heritage Given the present use of the site, further development is unlikely to have significant archaeological implications though there is some limited potential for survival within the proposal site.

The proposed development of this site may have an impact on the setting of the Listed Buildings at the site though this may be marginal when taken with the effects of the present use. Prior to permission for development, the impact of the proposals upon the Listed Buildings should be fully assessed. A suitable buffer area should be maintained between the development and the Listed Church.

95 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species and Local designated site within site.

Kent Wildlife Trust This site is adjacent to the Great Stour Ashford to Fordwich LWS and near to Larkey Valley Woods SSSI and LNR. As this site is adjacent to site 82 in combination impacts will need to be considered. The SSSI and LNR could be impacted indirectly by the recycling activities planned with possible impacts to the flora through emissions due to increased transport and the process itself. Any impacts will need to be identified and appropriate mitigation and compensation measures put in place. If the habitat remains available we recommend that a buffer of 15m be enhanced along the river corridor.

RSPB It would be important to ensure that this site does not negatively affect the adjacent SNCI as stated by the Sustainability Appraisal. Despite the permanent nature of this site, benefits for biodiversity could be included, for example through the inclusion of ponds.

Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment, and provided that: impacts on neighbouring environ- Protect Kent mental SNCI designations are fully understood and conditioned for in any permission.

Operator Brett Group- Support- Milton Manor Farm currently has the benefit of a planning permission for mineral processing and a concrete batching plant. The material source is not restricted to Canterbury City. Traffic generated from this facility would be on average 18 daily lorry movements. It is expected that HGV's bringing waste into the site for recycling will also be utilised for taking recycled material out of the site. It is hoped that this will be a permanent facility, therefore restoration of the site and after uses are not envisaged. Given that the site is already used as an industrial aggregate processing facility, the industrial nature of the proposed recycling facility will fit in with the nature of the surrounding landscape.

96 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 86- Total Responses 291

Charing Quarry support 1

13.12 This site is a part of Charing Quarry. The proposal is comment 6 Responses for a permanent recycled aggregate facility.

object 284 (Responses include a resident petition of 201 signatures)

0 100 200 300

Responses

Parish Council Charing-Object-Noise. Smell. Security lights. Security. Dust - properties already suffer one or more of these. Within these sites there is archaeology from the Roman and earlier periods that have not been investigated but 'KCC Heritage Conservation Group' and local Archaeological Groups are aware. The vehicle movements quoted for all sites do not take into account the ancillary vehicle movements necessary for all the sites. Dam- age to water courses that supply us and the Stour. Threat to important “Zone 1 Aquifers‟ water-courses in the parish that ultimately feed the Stour and Ashford. It is reported by local farmers that we have already lost water courses due to the construction of the M20 and High Speed Rail. Many sites are easily viewed from the “AONB‟ and “Special Landscape Area‟.

Heritage If development is contained within the quarried area of the site then such proposals are unlikely to have significant archaeological implications on the basis of present knowledge. Should works take place in areas that have not been quarried then there is potential for archaeology to be affected. In such a case then any archaeological measures can be secured through a condition on any consent.

Biodiversity European, UK and Local protected species and Local designated site within 1km.

97 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Highways The site has an existing sand extraction pit and so it is assumed that access will be from existing site access on Hook Lane. Hook Lane has been widened in recent years to improve access to the existing site, therefore KHS cannot foresee any issues with this site.

Protect Kent Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment, and provided that: impacts on neighbouring environmental SNCI designations are fully understood and conditioned for in any permission; impact of any increase in HGV traffic is managed within the permission. To minimise land take we recommend that this proposal is co-located with the proposed composting facility under Site 85.

Kent Wildlife Trust No objection in principle to an aggregate recycling facility on this site. However it will be important to consider the in combination impacts of this development with Site 74 and 77 of the Minerals Sites Document and site 85 and 87 of the Waste Sites Document.

RSPB Despite the permanent nature of this site, benefits for biodiversity could be included, for example through the inclusion of areas of lowland dry acid grassland or by complementing the nearby local wildlife site (SNCI).

General Public Responses -Too close to dwellings- Hook Lane is narrow and unable to accommodate two large vehicles in oppo-

site directions- The railway bridge is cracking and would soon be in need of repair-Noise, vibration

and dust-Smell attracting flies and vermin-No proven need-Health risks to residents-Primary School

down wind from site-Will be in view of North Down AONB-Historic relics on maps dating back to 1639-

Property values-Damage to hedgerows-Damage to wildlife-Seepage to water course damaging natural

water supply-Hazardous to local motorists, cyclists and pedestrians-Close proximity to residential

housing-Loss of public access

98 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

Site 91- Total Responses 5

Animal Products Site support 1

13.13 This site is currently utilised for the importation and re- comment 4 Responses cycling of glass material from Swale. The operator is propos- ing to use the site for recycling of glass but with the flexibility to also recycle construction and demolition waste. object 0

012345

District/ Borough Swale BC- The Council conditionally have no objection to this site as it is making an existing facility permanent which would protect existing jobs. Subject to assessment of transport/air quality impacts.

Biodiversity UK and Local protected species within site. European protected species and UK and Local designated sites within 1km.

Highways Assuming that access is taken from Oare Road for this modest site, opposite Western Link, there are unlikely to be any HGV capacity issues along this access route.

Kent Wildlife Trust We have no objection to an aggregates recycling plant on this site providing it can be proved to have no impact on the Swale SPA, Ramsar and SSSI sites adjacent.

99 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011)

RSPB It would be important to ensure that this site does not negatively affect the nearby Swale SPA/Ramsar site. Despite being a permanent site, the site plan could include benefits for biodiversity, for example through the inclusion of ponds.

Protect Kent Acceptable, subject to a more detailed assessment, and provided that: impact of any increase in HGV traffic is managed within the permission.

Operator Brett Group- Support- providing a permanent glass recycling facility at this site, energy is not being wasted elsewhere on producing new raw materials, thereby reducing emissions and providing a sustainable re-use of an important material. Given that this is an existing facility, no changes to existing operations are proposed and the benefits of using recycled glass over new raw materials are clear and apparent.

100 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) 14 Glossary

A Aggregate Inert particulate matter which is suitable for use (on its own or with the addition of cement or bitumi- nous material) in construction as concrete, mortar, finishes, road stone, asphalt, or drainage course, or for use as constructional fill or railway ballast.

Aggregates / Soils Recycling Rubble, hardcore and soil from construction and demolition projects can often be re-used on-site. Alternatively it can be taken to purpose built facilities for crushing, screening and re-sale. There are also temporary facilities at some quarries landfill sites where material can be recovered for re-sale or use on site.

Amenity A land use which is not productive agriculture, forestry or industrial development; can include formal and informal recreation and nature conservation.

Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) Records progress in implementing the Local Development Scheme and the performance of policies against targets in Development Plan Documents. Indicates what action an authority needs to take if it is not on track or policies needs to be revised/ replaced. Apportionment Kent’s share of the regional waste management capacity to be provided and Kent's share of the regional aggregate provision B Biodiveristy The variety of all life on earth (mammals, birds, fish, invertebrates, plants etc).

Brownfield Site Site previously used for or affected by development. It may be abandoned or in a derelict condition.

Building Sand/ Soft sand A naturally occurring type of construction aggregate found in Kent. It is mainly used for mortar production and in asphalt.

Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Technology produces power (electricity) whilst capturing the usable heat produced in the process. It is a single, integrated and more efficient method of production.

101 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) 14 Glossary

D Development Framework A portfolio of documents. Collective term for the Development Plan Documents, the Local Develop- ment Scheme, the Statement of Community Involvement, Annual Monitoring Report, and any sup- plementary planning documents.

Development Plan Document These are the spatial planning documents (plans) required by the Local Development Framework. These set out spatial planning policies and proposals for an area or topic. They replace the former Local Plan and include the core strategy, detailed development control policies, site specific allocations of land, area action plans (where needed) and a proposals map.

Examination in Public (EIP) All Development Plan Documents will be subject to an independent examination before a planning inspector. The inspector's report is binding on the local authority.

L Local Development Framework Local Development Framework Local Development Frameworks are a series of documents, which when adopted will replace adopted local plans.

Local Nature Reserve (LNR) Places with wildlife or geological features that are of special interest locally

M Metropolitan Green Belt (MGB) Metropolitan Green Belt A statutory green belt around London. It includes designated parts of Greater London and the surrounding counties of Bedfordshire, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Essex, Hertfordshire, Kent and Surrey in the South East and East of Kent regions. P

Permitted Reserves Saleable minerals in the ground with planning permission for winning and working. Usually ex- pressed in million tonners. Planning Policy Statements Planning Policy Statements are prepared by the government after public consultation to explain statutory provisions and provide guidance to local authorities and others on planning policy and the operation of the planning system.

102 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) 14 Glossary

R Ramsar Sites Sites of international importance to birds which inhabit wetlands. Ramsar is the name of the place where the Wetlands Convention was signed. Reclamation of Mineral Workings The combined processes of restoration and aftercare following completion of mineral working.

Reserve The remaining concentration or occurrence of workable material of intrinsic economic interest. Gen- erally used for those economic mineral deposits that have the benefit of planning permission.

Resource A concentration or occurrence of material of intrinsic economic interest in or on the Earth's crust in such a form, quality and quantity that they are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. Restoration Operations designed to return an area to an acceptable environmental state, whether for the re- sumption of the former land use or for a new use following mineral working. Involves the reinstate- ment of land by contouring, the spreading of soils or soil making materials etc . S Sharp Sand and Gravel Naturally occurring mineral deposit in Kent. Once extracted it is mainly used in the production of concrete products.

Safeguarding Protecting sites that have potential for relevant development (waste and minerals) from other development .

Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM) Nationally important monuments and archaeological areas that are protected under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act . Silica Sand (Industrial Sand) Material extracted and used in industrial processes including glass manufacture and the production of foundry castings. It is also used in horticulture and for sports surfaces including horse ménages and golf course bunker sand. It is also known as ‘Industrial Sand’.

Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) These sites are notified under Section 28 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 by English Na- ture whose responsibility is to protect these areas. These are important areas for nature conservation i.e. valuable flora, fauna or geological strata. English Nature needs to be notified of planning proposals in or adjacent to the designated areas. National Nature Reserves (NNRs), terrestrial RAMSAR sites, Special Protection Areas (SPAs) and Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) are also SSSIs under national legislation.

103 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) 14 Glossary

S Site (Specific) Allocations Sites which are generally well defined and where there is an implied presumption in favour of their being developed during the plan period

Strategic Environmental Assessment An evaluation process for assessing the environmental impacts of plans and programmes. This is a statutory requirement of the M&WDF system.

Submission A stage of the Development Plan Document preparation process where the document is 'submitted' to the Secretary of State for independent examination by a planning inspector. The document is published for public consultation prior to submission.

Sustainability Appraisal (SA) An evaluation process for assessing the environmental, social, economic and other sustainability effects of plans and programmes. This is a statutory requirement.

Sustainability A widely quoted definition of sustainable development is “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. The definition also encompasses the efficient use of natural resources.

104 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) 14 Glossary for Biodiversity Comments

Species Data EPS (European protected species) animals listed in Annex IV of the EU Habitats Directive, transposed into UK law in the Conservation Regulations 2010.

UKProtect Animals and Plants protected under the Badger Act, Wildlife and Countryside Act Schedule 5/9.1 (killing and injuring), Wildlife and Countryside Act sch8.

Local Species designated in the 2007 Biodiversity Action Plan list; birds designated as Red or Amber in the Birds of Conservation Concern 3 listing; species listed in the Kent Red Data Book.

Site Data

EuroSite Sites designated as Special Protection Area, Special Area of Conservation and/or Ramsar Site.

UKSite Sites designated as Site of Special Scientific Interest and/ or National Nature Reserve.

LocalSite Sites designated as Local Nature Reserve, Local Wildlife Site, Ancient Woodland and/or Biodiver- sity Action Plan Habitat.

105