DOCSLIB.ORG

Maidstone Risk Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maidstone Risk Profile Review of Emergency Response Provision: Maidstone Cluster Risk Profile RERP - Maidstone Cluster Risk Profile Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 Description of Cluster ............................................................................................................ 4 Cluster Demographics and Population Risk Factors.............................................................. 5 Deprivation ............................................................................................................................ 7 Overall Cluster Risk .............................................................................................................. 8 Dwellings ........................................................................................................................... 8 Special Service .................................................................................................................. 9 Geodemographic Segmentation .......................................................................................... 10 Cluster Geodemographic Segmentation .......................................................................... 11 Building Usage as a Risk Identifier ...................................................................................... 13 Other Building Risk ............................................................................................................. 14 Sleeping Accommodation Risk ........................................................................................ 14 Hospitals ...................................................................................................................... 15 Care Homes ................................................................................................................. 16 HMOs .......................................................................................................................... 17 Hotels .......................................................................................................................... 18 Non Sleeping Accommodation Risk ................................................................................. 19 Factories or Warehouses ............................................................................................. 20 Further Education Establishments ............................................................................... 21 Licensed Premises ....................................................................................................... 22 Offices ......................................................................................................................... 23 Premises Open to the Public ........................................................................................ 24 Other Sleeping Accommodation ................................................................................... 25 Other Workplaces ........................................................................................................ 26 Public Buildings............................................................................................................ 27 Schools ........................................................................................................................ 28 Shops .......................................................................................................................... 29 Specific Risks within the Cluster ......................................................................................... 30 COMAH Sites...................................................................................................................... 32 Infrastructure Risk ............................................................................................................... 33 Roads .............................................................................................................................. 34 Rail .................................................................................................................................. 35 Aviation ........................................................................................................................... 36 Ports ................................................................................................................................ 37 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest (SSSI) ........................................................................... 38 Flooding .............................................................................................................................. 39 Existing KFRS Arrangements .............................................................................................. 40 Future Development ........................................................................................................... 42 Population and Housing .................................................................................................. 43 Major Developments ........................................................................................................ 43 2 RERP - Maidstone Cluster Risk Profile Introduction In order to effectively assess the fire cover provision which is required to achieve the stated aims of the Authority an assessment of the risk factors for Kent and Medway needs to be undertaken. This document forms part of a suite of Risk Profile documents which segment the county into 19 geographically identifiable areas thereby allowing for a simplification of the assessment of the county wide risk. Kent and Medway Fire and Rescue Authority (KMFRA) divide the county into 19 clusters based on internal working arrangements and the day to day work activities of its personnel. These clusters have been in use since 2011 to analyse and report incident activity, creating a wealth of information which is used to gain a deep understanding of activity within each cluster. It therefore follows that these clusters be used as a backdrop to provide risk information, as this allows for a continuity of analysis across the RERP2 project. The map below illustrates these clusters. Information regarding risk factors has been obtained from a number of sources in order to provide a detailed level of risk for individual cluster. Much of the data within this document has been derived from information provided by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) a Government department charged with the collection and publication of statistics related to the economy, population and society. In March 2011 the ONS conducted the most recent census of the population. It is this information which is used extensively throughout this document as the most accurate societal data available. 3 RERP - Maidstone Cluster Risk Profile Each Local Authority within Kent and Medway has produced a Local Development Plan. These documents detail the strategic developments which are planned for their area of responsibility, and as such are referenced to give an indication of the future risk within the cluster. KMFRA has significant experience in planning for emergencies in sites of specific risk; as such numerous sites have been identified through previous internal work. These sites have been included within this document. This document describes the risk factors found in the Maidstone cluster. Description of Cluster The Maidstone cluster covers a geographical area of approximately 161 square miles and has a population of 155,551 people, a figure which represents 9.0% of Kent and Medway’s population. A map showing the cluster can be seen below. 4 RERP - Maidstone Cluster Risk Profile Cluster Demographics and Population Risk Factors The most current and widely available information with which to highlight the population risk factors is the 2011 census data. This data has been used to describe the community composition of each cluster. The following charts and tables provide information regarding the population, age and gender of the community which live within the Maidstone cluster. The male to female ratio, age breakdown by gender and composite age breakdown are comparable to the Kent and Medway average. 5 RERP - Maidstone Cluster Risk Profile Household types Total % One Family - Married or Civil Partnership Couple - Dependent Children 11,060 17.42 One Person - Other 9,073 14.29 One Family - Married or Civil Partnership Couple - No Children 9,047 14.25 One Person - Aged 65 and Over 7,414 11.67 One Family - All Aged 65 and Over 6,111 9.62 One Family - Lone Parent - Dependent Children 4,241 6.68 One Family - Married or Civil Partnership Couple - All Children Non-Dependent 3,892 6.13 One Family - Cohabiting Couple - No Children 3,731 5.87 One Family - Cohabiting Couple - Dependent Children 2,695 4.24 Other - Other 2,382 3.75 One Family - Lone Parent - All Children Non-Dependent 1,909 3.01 Other - With Dependent Children 1,398 2.20 One Family - Cohabiting Couple - All Children Non-Dependent 288 0.45 Other - All Aged 65 and Over 170 0.27 Other - All Full-Time Students 96 0.15 Total households 63,507 Notes for Household types: One family households are categorised by the presence of children into those with dependent children, those with non-dependent children only, and those with no children. Other households are categorised by the presence or absence of dependent children. Married includes those in a civil partnership. Households with dependent children include
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flash Flood History Southeast and Coast Date and Sources
    Flash flood history Southeast and coast Hydrometric Rivers Tributaries Towns and Cities area 40 Cray Darent Medway Eden, Teise, Beult, Bourne Stour Gt Stour, Little Stour Rother Dudwell 41 Cuckmere Ouse Berern Stream, Uck, Shell Brook Adur Rother Arun, Kird, Lod Lavant Ems 42 Meon, Hamble Itchen Arle Test Dever, Anton, Wallop Brook, Blackwater Lymington 101 Median Yar Date and Rainfall Description sources Sept 1271 <Canterbury>: A violent rain fell suddenly on Canterbury so that the greater part of the city was suddenly Doe (2016) inundated and there was such swelling of the water that the crypt of the church and the cloisters of the (Hamilton monastery were filled with water’. ‘Trees and hedges were overthrown whereby to proceed was not possible 1848-49) either to men or horses and many were imperilled by the force of waters flowing in the streets and in the houses of citizens’. 20 May 1739 <Cobham>, Surrey: The greatest storm of thunder rain and hail ever known with hail larger than the biggest Derby marbles. Incredible damage done. Mercury 8 Aug 1877 3 Jun 1747 <Midhurst> Sussex: In a thunderstorm a bridge on the <<Arun>> was carried away. Water was several feet deep Gentlemans in the church and churchyard. Sheep were drowned and two men were killed by lightning. Mag 12 Jun 1748 <Addington Place> Surrey: A thunderstorm with hail affected Surrey (and <Chelmsford> Essex and Warwick). Gentlemans Hail was 7 inches in circumference. Great damage was done to windows and gardens. Mag 10 Jun 1750 <Sittingbourne>, Kent: Thunderstorm killed 17 sheep in one place and several others.
    [Show full text]
  • Dave Brown by Dave Brown, 12-May-10 01:22 AM GMT
    Dave Brown by dave brown, 12-May-10 01:22 AM GMT Saturday 8th May 2010. One look out of the window told me today was not the day for butterflies or dragonflies. A phone call from a friend then had us heading to my favourite place. Good old Dungeness. Scenery not the best in the world but the wildlife exceeedingly good. Thirty minutes later we were watching a Whiskered Tern hawking insects over the New Diggings, showing from the road to Lydd. Also present were a few hundred Swifts, Swallows, House and Sand Martins, together with a few Common Terns. A quick chat with Dave Walker (very friendly Observatory Warden) and his equally friendly assistant confirmed that the recent weather there meant little or no Butterfly or moth activity. With the rain falling harder it was time to leave Dunge and head inland. The Iberian Chifchaf at Waderslade had already been present over a week so it was time to catch up with it. On arrival at the small wood of Chesnut Avenue the bird showed and sang within a few minutes of our arrival. This is still a scarce bird in Britain so where was the crowd. In 30 minutes the maximum crowd was five, and that included 3 from our family. It sang for long periods of time and only once did it mutter the usual Chifchaf call, otherwise it was Iberian Chifchaf all the way. It also look slighlty diferent in structure and colour. To my eyes the upper parts were greener, the legs were a brown colour and the tail appeared longer.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2017 Ashford Borough
    ASHFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL EXAMINATION LIBRARY SD10 Ashford Borough Council INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN 2017 1 CONTENTS Introduction p3 Background and context p5 Prioritisation p7 Overview of Infrastructure p12 Theme 1: Transport p13 Theme 2: Education p24 Theme 3: Energy p28 Theme 4: Water p32 Theme 5: Health and Social Care p38 Theme 6: Community Facilities p43 Theme 7: Sport and Recreation p47 Theme 8: Green Infrastructure / Biodiversity p54 Theme 9: Waste and Recycling p64 Theme 10: Public Realm p66 Theme 11: Art and Cultural Industries p67 Appendix 1: Links to evidence and management plans Appendix 2: Examples of letters to stakeholders and providers Appendix 3 & 4: Responses from our requests for information Appendix 5: Liaison with key stakeholders Appendix 6: The growth scenarios tested 2 Introduction 1.1 This Infrastructure Plan has been produced by Ashford Borough Council (the Council). The Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) provides: • background and context to key infrastructure that has been delivered recently or is in the process of being delivered, • an analysis of existing infrastructure provision, • stresses in the current provision, • what is needed to meet the existing and future needs and demands for the borough to support new development and a growing population, as envisaged through the Council’s emerging Local Plan 2030. 1.2 The IDP has been informed through discussion and consultation with relevant service providers operating in the Borough, alongside reviewing existing evidence and publications (such as management plans). 1.3 The IDP is supported by various appendices, as follows: • Appendix 1: Links to evidence and management plans – several stakeholders steered us towards their respective management plans and publications as a way of responding to our consultation and questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
    Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2011) Kent Minerals and Waste Development Framework
    Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Kent Minerals And Waste Development Framework Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Options Consultation (May 2011) Commentary Report (November 2011) 1 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Produced by : Planning and Environment Environment and Enterprise Kent County Council Invicta House Tel: 01622 221610 County Hall Email: [email protected] Maidstone Web: www.kent.gov.uk/mwdf Kent ME14 1XX 2 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Contents Page 1 Abbreviations 4 2 Introduction 5 3 Site Proposals 7 4 Responses for Mineral Sites DPD 9 5 Soft Sand Sites for Consideration 11 6 Sharp Sand and Gravel Sites for Consideration 33 7 Crushed Rock Sites for Consideration 53 8 Silica Sand Sites for Consideration 57 9 Chalk Sites for Consideration 61 10 Brickearth Sites for Consideration 67 11 Clay Sites for Consideration 71 12 Mineral Import Sites for Consideration 73 13 Secondary & Recycled Aggregates Sites for Consideration 75 14 Glossary 101 3 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Abbreviations AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty MGB Metropolitan Green Belt AQMA Air Quality Management Area MOD Ministry of Defence BAP Biodiversity Action Plan NNR National Nature Reserve BOA Biodiversity Opportunity Area PINS Planning Inspectorate CPRE Campaign to Protect Rural England PPS Planning Policy Statement DPD Development Plan Documents PROW Public Right of Way SA Sustainability Appraisal
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Assessment of Kent 2004
    CHILHAM: STOUR VALLEY Location map: CHILHAMCHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTION North of Bilting, the Stour Valley becomes increasingly enclosed. The rolling sides of the valley support large arable fields in the east, while sweeps of parkland belonging to Godmersham Park and Chilham Castle cover most of the western slopes. On either side of the valley, dense woodland dominate the skyline and a number of substantial shaws and plantations on the lower slopes reflect the importance of game cover in this area. On the valley bottom, the river is picked out in places by waterside alders and occasional willows. The railway line is obscured for much of its length by trees. STOUR VALLEY Chilham lies within the larger character area of the Stour Valley within the Kent Downs AONB. The Great Stour is the most easterly of the three rivers cutting through the Downs. Like the Darent and the Medway, it too provided an early access route into the heart of Kent and formed an ancient focus for settlement. Today the Stour Valley is highly valued for the quality of its landscape, especially by the considerable numbers of walkers who follow the Stour Valley Walk or the North Downs Way National Trail. Despite its proximity to both Canterbury and Ashford, the Stour Valley retains a strong rural identity. Enclosed by steep scarps on both sides, with dense woodlands on the upper slopes, the valley is dominated by intensively farmed arable fields interspersed by broad sweeps of mature parkland. Unusually, there are no electricity pylons cluttering the views across the valley. North of Bilting, the river flows through a narrow, pastoral floodplain, dotted with trees such as willow and alder and drained by small ditches.
    [Show full text]
  • Headcorn Matters
    HEADCORN MATTERS HEADCORN PARISH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN: 2011-2031 ISSUED BY: HEADCORN PARISH COUNCIL 2015 – REGULATION 16 CONSULTATION HEADCORN MATTERS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cllr. Lyn Selby Chair of Headcorn Parish Council would like to acknowledge and thank the following individuals and organisations who have helped in the production of the Headcorn Neighbourhood Plan: Co Authors: Dr Rebecca Driver and Michael Jefferys All the Past & Present Members of the Headcorn Matters Team, including the Steering Group, Extended Steering and Data Analysis Group with particular thanks to Chris Haynes, Hilary Hosford, James Ker and Tim Thomas. All the Members of Headcorn Parish Council, especially those past and present who worked from the beginning as part of the Data Analysis Group with special mention to Cllr Dave Andrews. All the volunteers who helped with the residents and business surveys. All parishioners and business people & owners who responded to the surveys, attended open meetings or just provided comments and feedback. Analytically Driven Limited Riki Therivel of Levett-Therivel Brian Whitely of Planning Aid Irene Seijo and the team at Design South East Sanderson Associates (Consulting Engineers) Ltd Maidstone Borough Council Southern Water 0 ISSUED BY: HEADCORN PARISH COUNCIL CONTENTS 1.0 Introducing Headcorn’s Neighbourhood Plan 7 1.1 Why produce a Neighbourhood Plan for Headcorn? 9 1.2 The policy environment governing Neighbourhood Plans 12 1.3 The policy framework underpinning Headcorn’s Neighbourhood Plan 15 1.4 Next steps for Headcorn’s
    [Show full text]
  • River Medway Catchment Management Plan Final Report
    NRA Southern 16 RIVER MEDWAY CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL REPORT NRA National Rivers Authority Southern Region J«iy 1993 MISSION STATEMENT The NRA’s mission is : "We will protect and improve the water environment by the effective management of water resources and by substantial reductions in pollution. We will aim to provide effective defence for people and property against flooding from rivers and the sea. In discharging our duties we will operate openly and balance the interests of all who benefit from and use rivers, groundwaters, estuaries, and coastal waters. We will be businesslike, efficient and caring towards our employees". NRA Copyright waiver This document is intended to be used widely and may be quoted, copied or reproduced in any way, provided that extracts are not quoted out of context and due acknowledgement is given to the National Rivers Authority. © Crown Copyright The maps in this document are based on the Ordnance Survey and are reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Published July 1993 En v ir o n m e n t Ag en c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West. Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD ENVIRONMENT AGENCY IIIIIIINIII 099853 River Medway Catchment Management Plan RIVER MEDWAY CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT pdwiatlonal Rivers Authority ] 'nformation Centre FINAL PLAN Head Office Class N o _____________ __ CONTENTS Accession No .AlAA___ Page INTRODUCTION SECTION A : STATE OF THE CATCHMENT A.1 SUMMARY 7 AJ2 HYDROLOGY & RAINFALL 9 HZ WATER SUPPLY 11 A.4 USE OF THE WATER RESOURCE 15 A.5 LANDSCAPE & CONSERVATION 17 A.6 RECREATION & AMENITY 19 U FISHERIES & ANGUNG 21 A.8 WATER QUALITY 23 A.9 FLOOD DEFENCE 27 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    EA - Southern EA LEAPs local environment agency plan MEDWAY LEAP ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW JANUARY 1999 EAST GRINSTEAD I En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Medway Area Key Details General Water Quality Area (sq km) 1780.99 River ecosystem classification as % of the Medway catchment between 1995-1997 Administrative Details Class Councils and % of the RE1 8 Kent Area they Administer RE2 30 Kent CC 67.1 RE3 12 Medway C 9.9 RE4 15 Surrey CC 8.2 RE5 1 East Sussex CC 12.5 Chemical GQA as % of sites in each class for West Sussex CC 2.3 the Medway catchment rivers in 1995 Class Population A 9 Year Population B 35 1991 734 000 C 35 2001 (Estimate) 755 000 D * 14 E 6 F 1 Water Resources Rainfall (mm/yr) Average 729 Pollution Prevention & Control Drought Conditions 571 Licensed Waste Sites 96 Number of licensed abstractions Surface Water 265 Process Industry Regulations Groundwater 201 21 (PIus two proposed) Impoundments 42 Radioactive Substance Regulations Authorised sites to accumulate and dispose of Conservation radioactive waste 8. Sites of Special Scientific Interest 49 Water Dependant SSSIs 30 Special Areas of Conservation 0 Flood Defence Special Protection Areas 0 Length (km) Ramsar Sites 3 Main River including tidal lengths 259.74 National Nature Reserves 2 Sea Defences Agency responsibility 11.66 Local Nature Reserves 0 Tidal Banks 55.33 Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty 0 Length of Inland Navigation 31km Fisheries Length of EC Designated Fisheries (km): Cyprinid Freshwater 87.2 Tidal 0 Salmonid Freshwater Bewl Water Tidal 0 DPC This book is due for return on or before the last date shown below.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Statement Marden Neighbourhood Plan April 2019
    Page | 1 Consultation Statement Marden Neighbourhood Plan April 2019 Marden Neighbourhood Plan Basic Consultation Statement April 2019 Regulation 16 Page | 2 WHAT IS A CONSULTATION STATEMENT? The purposes of this consultation statement is to set out how the Marden Neighbourhood Plan (MNP) has fully engaged with the local residential and business community, nearby parishes, service providers, decision makers and other stakeholders. This statement is prepared in accordance with the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012. Section 15 (2) states In this regulation ‘consultation statement’ means a document which – (a) contains details of the persons and bodies who were consulted about the proposed neighbourhood plan; (b) explains how they were consulted; (c) summarises the main issues and concerns raised by the persons consulted; and (d) describes how these issues and concerns have been considered and, where relevant, addressed in the proposed neighbourhood development plan. Marden Neighbourhood Plan Basic Consultation Statement April 2019 Regulation 16 Page | 3 THE ETHOS OF THE MARDEN NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Marden Parish Council has always taken a proactive approach to understanding that change is inevitable and not always such a bad thing. The Parish Council was represented in the production of the Marden Design Statement in 2001 and the Marden Community Plan in 2007. The Parish Council has been eager to support any community-led document which would represent the views of the village and be a useful tool to influence development within the Parish. The intention has always been to update the work of the previous documents and it was originally envisaged that this would take the form of a Parish Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Come and Join the Original KWT Green Team Group, We Have Been Going for Almost 20 Years
    Come and join the original KWT Green Team group, we have been going for almost 20 years. We work on a variety of sites from Sittingbourne to Sevenoaks to Staplehurst, going somewhere different every week in the KWT landrover. Does this sound like your kind of adventure? We’re lead by Steve Weeks, Medway Valley Warden, who has been working with Kent Wildlife Trust for many years, alongside some experienced and knowledgeable volunteer team leaders. We love sharing our enthusiasm and skills and welcome all levels of ability. Working on almost every habitat type in Kent, there is a huge variety to do. With this team if you hang around long enough there isn't a job you wont get the chance to be involved with! Why is it important? The Green Team are responsible for main- taining the reserves when there is no project funding to do the work. They are the glue that holds the reserves together year in, year out regardless. Without their help many of our smaller, wilder, quiet or hidden sites would Spring & Summer really struggle to hang on to their wildlife val- Construction such as fencing, boardwalks or ue. gates. Summer is weeding and surveying. Commitment: every Wednesday at various Autumn & Winter locations. Come weekly, monthly or on an ad- Winter is all about cutting stuff down and hoc basis. having a big bonfire, sometimes small Training: Full training is given and you’ll only woody regrowth of a chalk grassland, some- be asked to do work you are comfortable with. times huge coppice stools that need re- There is also the option to do further training invigorating with the full short back and in machinery or team leading too.
    [Show full text]
  • Russet Grove FINAL.Pdf
    Coming home to the garden of England Welcome to Russet Grove, a beautifully-designed development including 75 traditional private new homes, set against a stunning countryside backdrop in the picturesque village of Marden in Kent. Offering everything you will love about a village community in a tranquil, rural setting. Marden is also within easy reach of the bustling towns of Maidstone and Royal Tunbridge Wells, while its train line links you directly to the heart of London. BEHIND EVERY NAME, THERE IS A STORY Marden is at the centre of apple-growing country - the area is famed for its crops of Russet apples, and the village hockey and cricket club are affectionately known as the ‘Marden Russets’. Russet Grove is sited around the old Marden Cricket & Hockey Club fields, and we are very proud to sponsor them to create their new facilities and keep history alive as the village grows. RUSSET GROVE - HOMES PROVIDING THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS 1 RUSSET GROVE | MARDEN • KENT 1 PLACES PEOPLE LOVE WHETHER YOU ARE BUYING A countryside setting YOUR FIRST HOME, PLANNING AROUND AN EXPANDING FAMILY OR LOOKING TO DOWNSIZE for modern living FROM A LARGER PROPERTY, THERE WILL BE A PLACE YOU LOVE AT RUSSET GROVE. This outstanding collection of 2, 3, 4, and 5-bedroom new private homes will create the perfect community environment around a traditional village setting. This attractive village has something for everyone. Offering a delightful range of local amenities, schools, leisure facilities, country walks and fantastic eating and drinking venues. Marden truly unites the peace and fresh air of rural life with the best of modern living within easy reach.
    [Show full text]