Ireland's Woodland Heritage
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Common Forest Trees of NC
FFOORREESSTT TTRREEEESS OF NORTH CAROLINA North Carolina Forest Service TWENTIETH EDITION 2012 North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services The North Carolina Forest Service is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. Its programs, activities and employment practices are available to all people regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap or political affiliation. COMMON FOREST TREES OF NORTH CAROLINA ( R E V I S E D ) A POCKET MANUAL Produced by the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consum er Services North Carolina Forest Service Wib L. Owen, State Forester TWENTIETH EDITION 2012 Foreword Trees may be the oldest and largest living things in nature. They are closely associated with our daily lives, yet most of us know little about them and barely can tell one type of tree from another. Sixteen editions of this handy pocket guide have been printed since John Simcox Holmes, North Carolina's first State Forester, put together the first edition in 1922. Holmes' idea was to provide an easy-to-use reference guide to help people of all ages recognize many of our common forest trees on sight. That goal has not changed. Although the book has changed little, some uses of wood and general information about the trees have. Carriages and wagons, for example, aren't often made from Shagbark hickory (or anything else) anymore, and Loblolly pine now is used for making tremendous amounts of pine plywood, something unheard of in the 1920's. Keeping these changes in mind, we revised Common Forest Trees of North Carolina in 1977 and 1995. -
NPWS Regional Contacts
National Parks & Wildlife Service LoCall 1890 383 000 90 King Street North Website www.npws.ie Smithfield Email [email protected] Dublin 7 D07 N7CV Contact Information National Parks and Nature Reserves Ballycroy National Park, [email protected] (098) 49 996 Lagduff More, Ballycroy, Westport, Co. Mayo Burren National Park, [email protected] (065) 682 7693 NEPS Building, St. Francis Street, Ennis, Co. Clare Connemara National Park, [email protected] (095) 41 054 Letterfrack, Co. Galway Coole Park Nature Reserve, [email protected] (091) 631 804 Gort, Co. Galway Glenveagh National Park, [email protected] (076) 100 2537 Church Hill, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal Killarney National Park, [email protected] (065) 663 1440 Muckross House, Killarney, Co. Kerry Wexford Wildfowl Reserve, [email protected] (076) 100 2660 North Slob, Wexford Wicklow Mountains National Park, [email protected] (0404) 45 425 Kilafin, Laragh, Co. Wicklow Last updated 11 May 2020 Page 1 Regional Offices Eastern Division Divisional Manager (076) 100 2654 Divisional Ecologist (076) 100 2622 North Eastern Region Areas covered Regional Manager (076) 100 2591 Dublin, Kildare, Laois, Louth, District Conservation Officer (Kildare, Laois, Offaly) (076) 100 2594 Meath, Offaly District Conservation Officer (Dublin, Louth, Meath) (076) 100 2593 South Eastern Region Areas covered Regional Office (076) 100 2667 Carlow, Kilkenny, Wexford, Regional Manager (076) 100 2671 Wicklow (including Wicklow -
Douglas-Fir Series Psme
PSME 1 DOUGLAS-FIR SERIES Pseudotsuga menziesii PSME Patricia A. Martinez Thomas Atzet The latitudinal range of Douglas-fir is the greatest of any commercial conifer of western North America. Nearly pure stands of Douglas-fir continue south from their northern limit on Vancouver Island through western Washington, Oregon, and the Klamath and Coast Ranges of northern California as far south as the Santa Cruz Mountains. Douglas-fir behaves as a drought tolerant pioneer, with moderate tolerance to shade. It is best described as a generalist. Douglas-fir occurs in all series and at elevations ranging from sea level to 5600 feet. Rather than any particular parent material, soil depth, or aspect, Douglas-fir regeneration is associated with recently disturbed ground. Overstory presence of Douglas-fir indicates disturbance, while presence and dominance in the understory can indicate hot, dry conditions characteristic of the Series. Ponderosa pine and incense-cedar are the only major conifers with greater tolerance to drought (Minore 1979). Douglas-fir reproduces well in temperatures near 80 degrees F (Cleary and Waring 1969) and survives in less than two percent of full sunlight for at least several decades (Atzet and Waring 1970). Douglas-fir is not known, however, for its frost tolerance. Except for the isolated occurrences of climax stands of Oregon white oak and ponderosa pine, the Series occurs in the hottest, driest forest environments in southwestern Oregon. Douglas-fir grows under a wide variety of climatic conditions. Douglas-fir typically dominates the overstory in early, mid, and late seral successional stages in Temperate and Mediterranean ecosystems throughout the Pacific Northwest. -
Chestnut Oak Forest/Woodland
Classification of the Natural Communities of Massachusetts Terrestrial Communities Descriptions Chestnut Oak Forest/Woodland Community Code: CT1A3A0000 State Rank: S4 Concept: Oak forest of dry ridgetops and upper slopes, dominated by chestnut oak with an often dense understory of scrub oak, heaths, or mountain laurel. Environmental Setting: Chestnut Oak Forests/Woodlands occur as long narrow bands along dry ridges and upper slopes with thin soil over acidic bedrock. They may extend down steep, convex, rocky, often west- or south-facing slopes where soil is shallow and dry. The canopy is closed to partially open (>25% cover). There tends to be deep oak leaf litter with slow decomposition. Often many trees have multiple fire scars and charred bases; fire appears to play a role in maintaining the community occurrences. Chestnut Oak Forests/Woodlands often occur in a mosaic with closed oak or pine - oak forests down slope and more open communities above. Vegetation Description: The canopy of Chestnut Oak Forests/Woodlands is dominated, often completely, by chestnut oak (Quercus montana). Less abundant associates include other oaks (black (Q. velutina), red (Q. rubra), and/or white (Q. alba), and less commonly, scarlet (Q. coccinea)), with red maple (Acer rubrum), and white or pitch pines (Pinus strobus, P. rigida). The subcanopy layer is sparse and consists of canopy species, black birch (Betula lenta), and sassafras (Sassafras albidum). Tall shrubs are lacking or the shrub layer may have scattered tree saplings, mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), striped maple (Acer pensylvanicum), American chestnut (Castanea dentata), and witch hazel (Hamamelis virginiana). Short shrubs are dense in patches dominated by black huckleberry (Gaylussacia baccata) and lowbush blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium and V. -
Nomination of the Monastic City of Clonmacnoise and Its Cultural Landscape for Inclusion in the WORLD HERITAGE LIST
DRAFT Nomination of The Monastic City of Clonmacnoise and its Cultural Landscape For inclusion in the WORLD HERITAGE LIST Clonmacnoise World Heritage Site Draft Nomination Form Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................III 1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY ......................................................................1 1.a Country:..................................................................................................1 1.b State, Province or Region:......................................................................1 1.c Name of Property: ..................................................................................1 1.d Geographical co-ordinates to the nearest second ..................................1 1.e Maps and plans, showing the boundaries of the nominated property and buffer zone ........................................................................................................2 1.f Area of nominated property (ha.) and proposed buffer zone (ha.)..........3 2. DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................................4 2.a Description of Property ..........................................................................4 2.b History and development......................................................................31 3. JUSTIFICATION FOR INSCRIPTION ........................................................................38 3.a Criteria under which inscription -
Underwater Archaeological Assessment, River Lee Estuary, Monkstown, Co Cork
Underwater Archaeological Assessment, River Lee Estuary, Monkstown, Co Cork Inter-tidal Foreshore Survey, Owenduff River, Carrigaline, Co. Cork Cork Harbour Lower Drainage Scheme 0700030, 07R0135 20th October 2007 Project Director Dr. Niall Brady Project Archaeologist Rex Bangerter MA Brehon House, Kilkenny Road, Castlecomer, Co. Kilkenny [email protected] THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIVING COMPANY LTD. CONTENTS SUMMARY LIST OF FIGURES 2 LIST OF PLATES 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 5 3.0 THE RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT 5 4.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY 7 5.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 8 6.0 PROPOSED IMPACTS 10 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 11 8.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 APPENDIX 1: Abstract from Inventory of the East Cork Coast 14 detailing shipwrecks within Cork Harbour and surrounding coastline FIGURES AND PLATES 07D0030,07R0135 River Lee & Owenduff River, Co. Cork Underwater and Intertidal Archaeological Assessment SUMMARY The Archaeological Diving Company Ltd. was appointed by Aegis Archaeology Ltd, on behalf of Mott Macdonald Pettit (consulting engineers for Cork County Council), to undertake an underwater and intertidal archaeological survey of two pipeline impact corridors as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment for the proposed Cork Harbour Lower Drainage Scheme: the underwater assessment was undertaken along the works corridor identified for the proposed marine pipeline, crossing between Monkstown and Cobh (River Lee Estuary), and the inter-tidal survey was carried out across the route of the proposed foreshore pipeline at Carrigaline (north side of Owenduff River). Systematic visual inspection of the sub-tidal seabed and intertidal/ foreshore areas surrounding the proposed impacts did not reveal any material or features of archaeological significance. -
Heritage Bridges of County Cork
Heritage Bridges of County Cork Published by Heritage Unit of Cork County Council 2013 Phone: 021 4276891 - Email: [email protected]. ©Heritage Unit of Cork County Council 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the written permission of the publisher. Paperback - ISBN No. 978-0-9525869-6-8 Hardback - ISBN No. 978-0-9525869-7-5 Neither the authors nor the publishers (Heritage Unit of Cork County Council) are responsible for the consequences of the use of advice offered in this document by anyone to whom the document is supplied. Nor are they responsible for any errors, omissions or discrepancies in the information provided. Printed and bound in Ireland by Carraig Print inc. Litho Press Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork, Ireland. Tel: 021 4883458 List of Contributors: (those who provided specific information or photographs for use in this publication (in addition to Tobar Archaeology (Miriam Carroll and Annette Quinn), Blue Brick Heritage (Dr. Elena Turk) , Lisa Levis Carey, Síle O‟ Neill and Cork County Council personnel). Christy Roche Councillor Aindrias Moynihan Councillor Frank O‟ Flynn Diarmuid Kingston Donie O‟ Sullivan Doug Lucey Eilís Ní Bhríain Enda O‟Flaherty Jerry Larkin Jim Larner John Hurley Karen Moffat Lilian Sheehan Lynne Curran Nelligan Mary Crowley Max McCarthy Michael O‟ Connell Rose Power Sue Hill Ted and Nuala Nelligan Teddy O‟ Brien Thomas F. Ryan Photographs: As individually stated throughout this publication Includes Ordnance Survey Ireland data reproduced under OSi Licence number 2013/06/CCMA/CorkCountyCouncil Unauthorised reproduction infringes Ordnance Survey Ireland and Government of Ireland copyright. -
Mechanisms of Flooding in Cork City
National Hydrology Conference 2015 Olbert et al 03 - MECHANISMS OF FLOODING IN CORK CITY Agnieszka Indiana Olbert 1, Michael Hartnett 1, Joanne Comer 1, Stephen Nash 1 1National University of Ireland, Galway, School of Engineering and Informatics Abstract Flooding is one of the most frequent and devastating natural disasters. Many urban developments are located in estuaries where river flow and sea water merge. Cork City situated in the River Lee estuary is frequently the subject of extensive fluvial and coastal floods and is one such vulnerable location. It is chosen in this study to investigate the roles of the flood mechanisms on the extent of urban inundation. This paper provides a methodology for determination of mechanisms of urban flooding and their effects. Multiple drivers such as coastal and fluvial processes are considered to occur individually or jointly. In the assessment, interactions and dependencies between flood drivers are also included and accounted for in joint probability analysis. The patterns of flood wave propagation are investigated to establish roles of the individual flood drivers. The analysis of flooding is a multistep process involving both probabilistic and deterministic modelling where a probabilistic model provides inputs in terms of extreme sea water levels (coastal flooding) and river flows (fluvial flooding) as boundary conditions to a deterministic coastal model which simulates flood wave propagation and the extent of inundation. The MSN multi-scale nested ultra-high resolution numerical model is used to simulate 50- and 200-year extreme floods in the urban area of Cork City. Results show that the mechanism of flooding plays a crucial role in flood characteristics and inundation patterns. -
Listing and Index of Evening Herald Articles 1938 ~ 1975 by J
Listing and Index of Evening Herald Articles 1938 ~ 1975 by J. B. Malone on Walks ~ Cycles ~ Drives compiled by Frank Tracy SOUTH DUBLIN LIBRARIES - OCTOBER 2014 SOUTH DUBLIN LIBRARIES - OCTOBER 2014 Listing and Index of Evening Herald Articles 1938 ~ 1975 by J. B. Malone on Walks ~ Cycles ~ Drives compiled by Frank Tracy SOUTH DUBLIN LIBRARIES - OCTOBER 2014 Copyright 2014 Local Studies Section South Dublin Libraries ISBN 978-0-9575115-5-2 Design and Layout by Sinéad Rafferty Printed in Ireland by GRAPHPRINT LTD Unit A9 Calmount Business Park Dublin 12 Published October 2014 by: Local Studies Section South Dublin Libraries Headquarters Local Studies Section South Dublin Libraries Headquarters County Library Unit 1 County Hall Square Industrial Complex Town Centre Town Centre Tallaght Tallaght Dublin 24 Dublin 24 Phone 353 (0)1 462 0073 Phone 353 (0)1 459 7834 Email: [email protected] Fax 353 (0)1 459 7872 www.southdublin.ie www.southdublinlibraries.ie Contents Page Foreword from Mayor Fintan Warfield ..............................................................................5 Introduction .......................................................................................................................7 Listing of Evening Herald Articles 1938 – 1975 .......................................................9-133 Index - Mountains ..................................................................................................134-137 Index - Some Popular Locations .................................................................................. -
Irish Landscape Names
Irish Landscape Names Preface to 2010 edition Stradbally on its own denotes a parish and village); there is usually no equivalent word in the Irish form, such as sliabh or cnoc; and the Ordnance The following document is extracted from the database used to prepare the list Survey forms have not gained currency locally or amongst hill-walkers. The of peaks included on the „Summits‟ section and other sections at second group of exceptions concerns hills for which there was substantial www.mountainviews.ie The document comprises the name data and key evidence from alternative authoritative sources for a name other than the one geographical data for each peak listed on the website as of May 2010, with shown on OS maps, e.g. Croaghonagh / Cruach Eoghanach in Co. Donegal, some minor changes and omissions. The geographical data on the website is marked on the Discovery map as Barnesmore, or Slievetrue in Co. Antrim, more comprehensive. marked on the Discoverer map as Carn Hill. In some of these cases, the evidence for overriding the map forms comes from other Ordnance Survey The data was collated over a number of years by a team of volunteer sources, such as the Ordnance Survey Memoirs. It should be emphasised that contributors to the website. The list in use started with the 2000ft list of Rev. these exceptions represent only a very small percentage of the names listed Vandeleur (1950s), the 600m list based on this by Joss Lynam (1970s) and the and that the forms used by the Placenames Branch and/or OSI/OSNI are 400 and 500m lists of Michael Dewey and Myrddyn Phillips. -
Vegetation of the Douglas-Fir Region
Vegetation Of The Douglas-Fir Region Purchased by the Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture J. F. Franklin, Chief Plant Ecologist, PNW Forest and Range for official use. Experiment Station, U.S. Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon Reprinted from "Forest Soils of the Douglas-Fir Region,": a book developed by the members of the Northwest Forest Soils Council; published in 1979 by Washington State University Cooperative Extension; compiled and edited by Paul E. Heilman, Harry W. Anderson, and David M. Baum gartner. Copies of this book may be purchased from: Conference Of- fice, Cooperative Extension, WSU, Pullman, WA 99164 CHAPTER IV VEGETATION OF THE DOUGLAS-FIR REGION Jerry F. Franklin The Douglas-fir region of western Washington and array of potentially productive tree species as alternatives or Oregon and northwestern California is one of the most associates to Douglas-fir. densely forested areas of the world. It represents maximal development of the temperate coniferous forest. The region These large. long-lived species dominate dense forests is well known for the extensive areas dominated by Douglas- rather than occurring as isolated individuals. Consequently. fir, with climax forests of western hemlock and western old-growth ecosystems in this region have the greatest bio- redcedar, and coastal "rain forests" of coast redwood and mass accumulations of any plant formations in the temperate Sitka spruce. In this chapter I will attempt to outline major zone and, probably, the world. Coast redwood stands are, of compositional, structural, and successional features of these course, the star of the show with biomass accumulations of varied and productive forests. -
Cultivated Willows Would Not Be Appropriate Without Mention of the ‘WEEPING WILLOW’
Alexander Robertson Notes on willows cultivated in Scotland and a few sketches of willows sampled from my clonal collection HISTORICAL NOTES Since the knowledge of willows is of great antiquity, it is with the ancient Greeks and Romans we shall begin, for among these people numerous written records remain. The growth habit, ecology, cultivation and utilization of willows was well— understood by Theophrastus, Ovid, Herodotus, Pliny and Dioscorides. Virgil was also quite familiar with willow, e.g. Damoetas complains that: “Galatea, saucy girl, pelts me with apples and then runs off to the willows”. ECLOGIJE III and of foraging bees: “Far and wide they feed on arbutus, pale-green willows, on cassia and ruddy crocus .. .“ GEORGICS IV Theophrastus of Eresos (370—285 B.C.) discussed many aspects of willows throughout his Enquiry into Plants including habitats, wood quality, coppicing and a variety of uses. Willows, according to Theophrastus are lovers of wet places and marshes. But he also notes certain amphibious traits of willows growing in mountains and plains. To Theophrastus they appeared to possess no fruits and quite adequately reproduced themselves from roots, were tolerant to flooding and frequent coppicing. “Even willows grow old and when they are cut, no matter at what height, they shoot up again.” He described the wood as cold, tough, light and resilient—qualities which made it useful for a variety of purposes, especially shields. Such were the diverse virtues of willow that he suggested introducing it for plant husbandry. Theophrastus noted there were many different kinds of willows; three of the best known being black willow (Salix fragilis), white willow (S.