RAC) Committee for Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RAC) Committee for Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC 1 (385) Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) Committee for Socio-economic Analysis (SEAC) Background document to the Opinion on the Annex XV dossier proposing restrictions on Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), PFOA salts and PFOA-related substances ECHA/RAC/RES-O-0000006229-70-02/F ECHA/SEAC/[reference code to be added after the adoption of the SEAC opinion] EC Number CAS Number 206-397-9 335-67-1 11 September 2015 Annankatu 18, P.O. Box 400, FI-00121 Helsinki, Finland | Tel. +358 9 686180 | Fax +358 9 68618210 | echa.europa.eu ANNEX XV PROPOSAL FOR A RESTRICTION – Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), PFOA salts and PFOA-related substances About this document This Background Document to the opinions of RAC and SEAC is an amended version of the Annex XV restriction report submitted by Germany and Norway. The amendments include further information obtained during the public consultation and other relevant information resulting from the opinion making process. The evaluation made by RAC and SEAC of the information presented in this document can be found in their opinions and justification. Where relevant some additional assessment by the RAC or SEAC rapporteurs can be found in boxes in the document. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 7 About this report ........................................................................................................... 8 A. Proposal ............................................................................................................... 10 A.1 Proposed restriction ........................................................................................ 10 A.1.1 The identity of the substances .............................................................. 10 A.1.2 Scope and conditions of restriction ........................................................ 12 A.2 Targeting ....................................................................................................... 13 A.3 Summary of the justification ............................................................................ 14 A.3.1 Identified hazard and risk .................................................................... 14 A.3.2 Justification that action is required on a community-wide basis ................. 16 A.3.3 Justification that the proposed restriction is the most appropriate community-wide measure .................................................................... 16 A.3.4 Uncertainties ...................................................................................... 18 B. Information on hazard and risk ............................................................................... 20 B.1 Identity of the substances and physical and chemical properties ........................... 20 B.1.1 Name and other identifiers of the substances ......................................... 20 B.1.2 Physicochemical properties .................................................................. 23 B.1.3 Justification for grouping ...................................................................... 27 B.2 Manufacture and uses ..................................................................................... 28 B.2.1 Production and import of PFOA and PFOA-related substances in(to) the EU 28 B.2.2 Uses of PFOA and PFOA-related substances ............................................ 30 B.2.3 Summary and conclusions on manufacturing, import and use of PFOA and related substances .............................................................................. 37 B.3 Classification and labelling ............................................................................... 38 B.3.1 Classification and labelling in Annex VI of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation) ................................................................................. 38 B.3.2 Classification and labelling in classification and labelling inventory/Industry’s self-classification(s) and labelling .......................................................... 38 B.4 Environment .................................................................................................. 40 B.4.1 Environmental fate properties............................................................... 40 B.4.2 Environmental hazard assessment ........................................................ 61 B.4.3 PBT and vPvB assessment .................................................................... 61 B.4.4 Characterisation of environmental releases and exposure ........................ 67 B.4.5 Environmental risk characterisation ....................................................... 89 B.5 Human Health ................................................................................................ 89 B.5.1 Human health hazard assessment ......................................................... 89 B.5.2 Human health hazard assessment of physico-chemical properties ........... 116 B.5.3 Human health exposure assessment ................................................... 116 B.5.4 Human health risk characterization ..................................................... 130 B.5.5 Summary and discussion on human hazard and risk .............................. 137 ANNEX XV PROPOSAL FOR A RESTRICTION – Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), PFOA salts and PFOA-related substances C. Available information on alternatives ........................................................................ 143 C.1 Identification of potential alternative substances and techniques ........................ 143 C.2 Assessment of fluorotelomer-based short-chain chemistry ................................. 145 C.2.1 Availability of fluorotelomer-based short-chain chemistry ....................... 145 C.2.2 Human health risks related to fluorotelomer-based short-chain chemistry 145 C.2.3 Environment risks related to fluorotelomer-based short-chain chemistry .. 147 C.2.4 Technical and economic feasibility of fluorotelomer-based short-chain chemistry ........................................................................................ 150 C.3 Assessment of alternatives for fluoropolymer polymerisation processing aid ......... 150 C.3.1 CAS 62037-80-3 – Ammonium 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2- (heptafluoropropoxy)propanoate (C3 Dimer salt) .................................. 151 C.3.2 EC 480-310-4 – Ammonium 2,2,3-trifluoro-3-(1,1,2,2,3,3-hexafluoro-3- trifluoromethoxypropoxy)propionate (ADONA) ..................................... 153 C.3.3 CAS 908020-52-0 - Ammonium difluoro[1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro-2- (pentafluoroethoxy)ethoxy]acetate (EEA-NH4) ..................................... 156 D. Justification for action on a Community-wide basis ................................................... 159 D.1 Considerations related to human health and environmental risks ........................ 159 D.2 Considerations related to internal market ........................................................ 159 D.3 Other considerations ..................................................................................... 160 D.4 Summary .................................................................................................... 160 E. Justification why the proposed restriction is the most appropriate Community-wide measure .............................................................................................................. 161 E.1 Identification and description of potential risk management options .................... 161 E.1.1 Risk to be addressed - the baseline ..................................................... 161 E.1.2 Options for restrictions ...................................................................... 163 E.1.3 Other Union-wide risk management options than restriction ................... 169 E.2 Assessment of risk management options ......................................................... 173 E.2.1 Restriction option 1a: Phase out of PFOA, its salts, and PFOA-related substances over 18 months ................................................................ 173 E.2.2 Restriction option 1b: Phase out of PFOA and PFOA-related substances within 18 months including possible exemptions ............................................ 181 E.3 Comparison of the risk management options ...................................................... 185 E.4 Main assumptions used and decisions made during analysis ................................. 185 E.5 The proposed restrictions and summary of the justifications ................................. 186 F. Socio-economic Assessment of Proposed Restriction ................................................. 187 F.1 Human health and environmental impacts ....................................................... 187 F.1.1 Risks of PFOA and PFOA-related substances as PBT substances .............. 187 F.1.2 Benefits of reducing emissions of PFOA and PFOA-related substances ...... 187 F.2 Economic impacts ........................................................................................ 193 F.2.1 Overview of supply chains affected ..................................................... 193 F.2.2 Cost assessment of the proposed restriction ......................................... 194 F. 2.3 Use of PFOA and its salts ................................................................... 194 F.2.4 Use of PFOA-related substances .......................................................... 197 F.2.5 Summary of economic impacts ........................................................... 200 F.2.6
Recommended publications
  • Fluorinated Polymers As Smart Materials for Advanced Biomedical Applications
    polymers Review Fluorinated Polymers as Smart Materials for Advanced Biomedical Applications Vanessa F. Cardoso 1,2,* ID , Daniela M. Correia 3,4, Clarisse Ribeiro 1,5 ID , Margarida M. Fernandes 1,5 and Senentxu Lanceros-Méndez 4,6 1 Centro/Departamento de Física, Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; cribeiro@fisica.uminho.pt (C.R.); margaridafernandes@fisica.uminho.pt (M.M.F.) 2 CMEMS-UMinho, Universidade do Minho, DEI, 4800-058 Guimaraes, Portugal 3 Departamento de Química e CQ-VR, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal; [email protected] 4 BCMaterials, Basque Center for Materials, Applications and Nanostructures, UPV/EHU Science Park, 48940 Leioa, Spain; [email protected] 5 CEB—Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal 6 IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48013 Bilbao, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +351-253-60-40-73 Received: 11 January 2018; Accepted: 6 February 2018; Published: 8 February 2018 Abstract: Fluorinated polymers constitute a unique class of materials that exhibit a combination of suitable properties for a wide range of applications, which mainly arise from their outstanding chemical resistance, thermal stability, low friction coefficients and electrical properties. Furthermore, those presenting stimuli-responsive properties have found widespread industrial and commercial applications, based on their ability to change in a controlled fashion one or more of their physicochemical properties, in response to single or multiple external stimuli such as light, temperature, electrical and magnetic fields, pH and/or biological signals. In particular, some fluorinated polymers have been intensively investigated and applied due to their piezoelectric, pyroelectric and ferroelectric properties in biomedical applications including controlled drug delivery systems, tissue engineering, microfluidic and artificial muscle actuators, among others.
    [Show full text]
  • PVDF: a Fluoropolymer for Chemical Challenges
    Electronically reprinted from August 2018 PVDF: A Fluoropolymer for Chemical Challenges When it comes to selecting materials of construction, keep in mind the favorable properties of fluoropolymers for corrosive service Averie Palovcak and Jason ince its commercialization in the Pomante, mid-1960s, polyvinylidene fluoride Arkema Inc. (PVDF) has been used across a Svariety of chemical process indus- tries (CPI) sectors due to its versatility and IN BRIEF broad attributes. With flagship applications PVDF AND THE in architectural coatings and the CPI, the FLUOROPOLYMER FAMILY breadth of industries where PVDF is utilized today is expansive. PVDF components (Fig- COPOLYMERS CHANGE ures 1 and 2) are utilized and installed where FLEXURAL PROPERTIES engineers are looking to maximize longevity PVDF COMPONENTS and reliability of process parts in many CPI sectors, including semiconductor, pharma- FIGURE 1. A variety of fluoropolymer components are shown ceutical, food and beverage, petrochemi- here cal, wire and cable, and general chemicals. change the performance properties. Fluo- PVDF and the fluoropolymer family ropolymers are divided into two main cat- PVDF is a high-performance plastic that falls egories: perfluorinated and partially fluori- into the family of materials called fluoropoly- nated [1]. The partially fluorinated polymers mers. Known for robust chemical resistance, contain hydrogen or other elements, while fluoropolymers are often utilized in areas the perfluorinated (fully fluorinated) poly- where high-temperature corrosion barriers mers are derivatives or copolymers of the are crucial. In addition to being chemically tetrafluoroethylene (C2F4) monomer. Com- resistant and non-rusting, this family of poly- monly used commercial fluoropolymers mers is also considered to have high purity, include polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), non-stick surfaces, good flame and smoke perfluoroalkoxy polymer (PFA), fluorinated resistance, excellent weathering and ultra- ethylene propylene (FEP), polyvinylidene violet (UV) stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Hydrofluorocarbon Ethers and New Amorphous Fluoropolymers with Cyclic Fluorocarbon Ether Units
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations August 2016 Synthesis of Hydrofluorocarbon Ethers and New Amorphous Fluoropolymers with Cyclic Fluorocarbon Ether Units Xiaolin Liu Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Liu, Xiaolin, "Synthesis of Hydrofluorocarbon Ethers and New Amorphous Fluoropolymers with Cyclic Fluorocarbon Ether Units" (2016). All Dissertations. 2539. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/2539 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SYNTHESIS OF HYDROFLUOROCARBON ETHERS AND NEW AMORPHOUS FLUOROPOLYMERS WITH CYCLIC FLUOROCARBON ETHER UNITS A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Materials Science and Engineering by Xiaolin Liu August 2016 Accepted by: Joseph S. Thrasher, Ph.D., Committee Chair Marek W. Urban, Ph.D. Gary C. Lickfield, Ph.D. Stephen H. Foulger, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The main focus of this work is the synthesis of hydrofluorocarbon ethers (HFEs). New synthetic methods and new HFEs were successfully developed. In Chapter 1, new HFEs were synthesized with tetrafluoroethylene (CF2=CF2, TFE) as new engineered fluids. The fluorinated olefins’ addition to alcohols is a more conventional approach to HFEs, and in our group a synthetic method consists of three steps was attempted: a. radical addition of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) to 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane compound; b. hydrolysis of the fluorinated dioxolane compound to make a diol; c.
    [Show full text]
  • PTFE and PFA Similarities and Differences White Paper PTFE and PFA Similarities and Differences
    White Paper PTFE and PFA Similarities and Differences White Paper PTFE and PFA Similarities and Differences Introduction The purpose of this document is to define and compare two of the most used fluoropolymers, PTFE and PFA, in industry globally and clarify the differences between them. Defining PTFE and PFA Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is a synthetic fluoropolymer of tetrafluoroethylene that has numerous applications. The most widely known PTFE formulation is sold under the brand name of Teflon®. PTFE was discovered by DuPont Co. in 1938. Perfluoroalkoxy alkanes (PFA) is a copolymer of hexafluoropropylene and perfluoroethers. It was developed after the discovery of PTFE by the same producer (DuPont Co.). One commonly known PFA formulation is Teflon PFA. PFA has very similar properties to PTFE, though the biggest difference between PTFE and PFA is that PFA is melt-processed. This is accomplished through conventional injection molding as well as screw extrusion techniques. Area of use PTFE is popularly used as a non-stick coating for pans and many modern items of cookware. PTFE is often used in containers and pipes for handling reactive and corrosive chemicals. This is because it has non-reactive properties. Another practical application of PTFE is as a lubricant. Used in this way, PTFE helps to reduce friction within machinery, minimize the “wear and tear,” and improve energy consumption. PFA is generally used for plastic lab equipment because of its extreme resistance to chemical attack, optical transparency, and overall flexibility. PFA is also often used as tubing for handling critical or highly corrosive processes. Other applications for PFA are as sheet linings for chemical equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 14 Green Chemistry
    Green Chemistry Accepted Manuscript This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been accepted for publication. Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after acceptance, before technical editing, formatting and proof reading. Using this free service, authors can make their results available to the community, in citable form, before we publish the edited article. We will replace this Accepted Manuscript with the edited and formatted Advance Article as soon as it is available. You can find more information about Accepted Manuscripts in the Information for Authors. Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the text and/or graphics, which may alter content. The journal’s standard Terms & Conditions and the Ethical guidelines still apply. In no event shall the Royal Society of Chemistry be held responsible for any errors or omissions in this Accepted Manuscript or any consequences arising from the use of any information it contains. www.rsc.org/greenchem Page 1 of 14 Green Chemistry Organofluorine Chemistry: Applications, sources and sustainability Antal Harsanyi and Graham Sandford* Department of Chemistry, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, U.K. *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript Abstract Fluorine is an essential element for life in the developed world that impacts hugely on the general public because many pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, anaesthetics, materials and air conditioning materials owe their important properties to the presence of fluorine atoms within their structures. Accepted All fluorine atoms used in organic chemistry are ultimately sourced from a mined raw material, fluorspar (CaF 2), but, given current usage and global reserve estimates, there is only sufficient fluorspar available for a further 100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,440,044 B2 Roof Et Al
    USOO944004.4B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,440,044 B2 Roof et al. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 13, 2016 (54) PEELABLE HEAT-SHRINK TUBING (56) References Cited (71) Applicant: Zeus Industrial Products, Inc., U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Orangeburg, SC (US) 4,029,868 A 6, 1977 Carlson (72) Inventors: Irina Puzdrjakova Roof. Lexington, 4,568,275 A 2f1986 Sakurai SC (US); Brian Robert Tomblin, Columbia, SC (US); Zeth Eberling, (Continued) Columbia, SC (US); Bruce L. Anneaux, Lexington, SC (US); Douglas FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Lee Tourville, Orangeburg, SC (US) EP 1605 014 A1 12/2005 (73) Assignee: Zeus Industrial Products, Inc., EP 2 338 935 A1 6, 2011 Orangeburg, SC (US) (Continued) (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this patent is extended or adjusted under 35 OTHER PUBLICATIONS U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report & The (21) Appl. No.: 14/753,115 Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration from co-pending International Application No. PCT/ (22) Filed: Jun. 29, 2015 US2O15,034536. (65) Prior Publication Data (Continued) US 2015/0354732 A1 Dec. 10, 2015 Related U.S. Application Data Primary Examiner — Michael C Miggins (63) Continuation of application No. 147732,372, filed on (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Womble Carlyle Jun. 5, 2015. Sandridge & Rice LLP. Louis Isaf. Jessica Gorczynski (60) Provisional application No. 62/008,708, filed on Jun. 6, 2014. (57) ABSTRACT (51) Int. Cl. A6M 25/00 (2006.01) A heat shrink tubing, which can be readily peeled in the B29C 65/02 (2006.01) longitudinal direction after use (e.g., to remove the heat (Continued) shrink tubing from an underlying material) is provided herein.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BECKMAN CENTER for the HISTORY of CHEMISTRY HERMAN E. SCHROEDER Transcript of Interviews Conducted by Raymond C. Ferguson In
    THE BECKMAN CENTER FOR THE HISTORY OF CHEMISTRY HERMAN E. SCHROEDER Transcript of Interviews Conducted by Raymond C. Ferguson in Greenville, Delaware on 30 December 1986 and 12 January 1987 This interview has been designated as Free Access. One may view, quote from, cite, or reproduce the oral history with the permission of CHF. Please note: Users citing this interview for purposes of publication are obliged under the terms of the Chemical Heritage Foundation Oral History Program to credit CHF using the format below: Herman E. Schroeder, interview by Raymond C. Ferguson at Greenville, Delaware, 30 December 1986 and 12 January 1987 (Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation, Oral History Transcript # 0063). Chemical Heritage Foundation Oral History Program 315 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 The Chemical Heritage Foundation (CHF) serves the community of the chemical and molecular sciences, and the wider public, by treasuring the past, educating the present, and inspiring the future. CHF maintains a world-class collection of materials that document the history and heritage of the chemical and molecular sciences, technologies, and industries; encourages research in CHF collections; and carries out a program of outreach and interpretation in order to advance an understanding of the role of the chemical and molecular sciences, technologies, and industries in shaping society. HERMAN E. SCHROEDER 1915 Born in Brooklyn, New York on 6 July Education 1936 A.B., chemistry, Harvard University 1937 A.M., chemistry, Harvard University
    [Show full text]
  • Working Towards a Global Emission Inventory of Pfass
    WORKING TOWARDS A GLOBAL EMISSION INVENTORY OF PFASS: FOCUS ON PFCAS - STATUS QUO AND THE WAY FORWARD OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications Series on Risk Management No. 30 WORKING TOWARDS A GLOBAL EMISSION INVENTORY OF PFASS: FOCUS ON PFCAS - STATUS QUO AND THE WAY FORWARD This publication is available electronically, at no charge. For this and many other Environment, Health and Safety publications, consult the OECD’s World Wide Web site (www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/) or contact: OECD Environment Directorate, Environment, Health and Safety Division 2 rue André-Pascal 75775 Paris Cedex 16 France Fax: (33-1) 44 30 61 80 E-mail: [email protected] Environment Directorate ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Paris 2015 Also published in the Series on Risk Management: No. 1: Lead. Background and National Experience with Reducing Risk (1993) No. 2: Methylene Chloride. Background and National Experience with Reducing Risk (1994) No. 3: Selected Brominated Flame Retardants. Background and National Experience with Reducing Risk (1994) No. 4: Mercury. Background and National Experience with Reducing Risk (1994) No. 5: Cadmium. Background and National Experience with Reducing Risk (1994) No. 6: Methylene Chloride Information Exchange Programme: Survey Results (1996) No. 7: Proceedings of the OECD Workshop on Non-Regulatory Initiatives for Chemical Risk Management (1997) No. 8: Proceedings of the OECD Workshop on the Effective Recycling of Nickel-Cadmium Batteries, Lyon, France, 23-25 September 1997 (1999) No. 9: Proceedings of the OECD Workshop on the Integration of Socio-Economic Analysis in Chemical Risk Management Decision-making, London, 7-9 January, 1998 (1999) No. 10: Proceedings of the OECD Workshop on Sustainable Chemistry, Venice, 15-17 October 1998 (1999) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribological, Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene Filled with Al-Cu-Cr Quasicrystals, Polytetraf
    polymers Article Tribological, Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene Filled with Al-Cu-Cr Quasicrystals, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Synthetic Graphite and Carbon Black Leonid K. Olifirov, Andrey A. Stepashkin, Galal Sherif and Victor V. Tcherdyntsev * Laboratory of Functional Polymer Materials, National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”, Leninskii Prosp, 4, 119049 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (L.K.O.); [email protected] (A.A.S.); [email protected] (G.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-9104002369 Abstract: Antifriction hybrid fluorinated ethylene propylene-based composites filled with quasicrys- talline Al73Cu11Cr16 powder, polytetrafluoroethylene, synthetic graphite and carbon black were elaborated and investigated. Composite samples were formed by high-energy ball milling of ini- tial powders mixture with subsequent consolidation by injection molding. Thermal, mechanical, and tribological properties of the obtained composites were studied. It was found that composite containing 5 wt.% of Al73Cu11Cr16 quasicrystals and 2 wt.% of nanosized polytetrafluoroethylene has 50 times better wear resistance and a 1.5 times lower coefficient of dry friction comparing with unfilled fluorinated ethylene propylene. Addition of 15 wt.% of synthetic graphite to the above men- tioned composition allows to achieve an increase in thermal conductivity in 2.5 times comparing with Citation: Olifirov, L.K.; Stepashkin, unfilled fluorinated ethylene propylene, at that this composite kept excellent tribological properties. A.A.; Sherif, G.; Tcherdyntsev, V.V. Tribological, Mechanical and Thermal Keywords: composites; fluoroplastic; quasicrystals; polytetrafluoroethylene; ball milling; injection Properties of Fluorinated Ethylene molding; wear resistance; coefficient of friction; thermal conductivity Propylene Filled with Al-Cu-Cr Quasicrystals, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Synthetic Graphite and Carbon Black.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2015/168096 Al 5 November 2015 (05.11.2015) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2015/168096 Al 5 November 2015 (05.11.2015) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every H01B 3/44 (2006.01) C08K 5/09 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, C08K 5/01 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) Number: International Application DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/US20 15/027950 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (22) International Filing Date: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, 28 April 2015 (28.04.2015) MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (25) Filing Language: English SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, (26) Publication Language: English TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 61/987,716 1 May 2014 (01.05.2014) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, (71) Applicant: E. I.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of Sampling Pumps Used for Groundwater Monitoring at the Hanford Site
    PNNL-13690 Selection of Sampling Pumps Used for Groundwater Monitoring at the Hanford Site R. Schalla W. D. Webber R. M. Smith November 2001 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RL901830 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; prices available from (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161 This document was printed on recycled paper. PNNL-13690 Selection of Sampling Pumps Used for Groundwater Monitoring at the Hanford Site R. Schalla W. D. Webber R. M. Smith November 2001 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Summary The variable frequency drive centrifugal submersible pump, Redi-Flo2 made by Grundfos, was selected for universal application for Hanford Site groundwater monitoring. Specifications for the selected pump and five other pumps were evaluated against current and future Hanford groundwater monitoring performance requirements, and the Redi-Flo2 was selected as the most versatile and applicable for the range of monitoring conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Dupont Data Book Contents Dupont Investor Relations
    2006 DuPont Data Book Contents DuPont Investor Relations 1 2006 Summary 2 2006 At a Glance 4 Corporate Financial Data Corporate Highlights Carl Lukach Karen Fletcher Vice President Director Segment Information (302) 774-0001 (302) 774-1125 Consolidated Income Statements Consolidated Balance Sheets Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Selected Additional Data 14 DuPont Core Values, Sustainability, and Six Sigma Laurie Conslato Jim Jacobson Pam Schools Manager Manager Investor Relations 15 Industries, Regions, and Ingredients (302) 774-6088 (302) 774-0017 Coordinator (302) 774-9870 16 DuPont Science & Technology 18 Business Segments DuPont Data Book has been prepared to assist financial analysts, portfolio managers Agriculture & Nutrition and others in understanding and evaluating the company. This book presents graphics, tabular, and other statistical data about the consolidated company and its business Coatings & Color Technologies segments. The information presented in this book is generally included in—or can be calculated from—previously issued press releases and published company reports on Electronic & Communication Technologies Forms 10K, 10Q, and 8K. In particular, segment data is consistent with the 8K furnished Performance Materials on April 4, 2007. Dollars are in millions except per share or where otherwise indicated. Most notes to financial statements are not included. This information is only a summary Safety & Protection and should be read in conjunction with the company’s audited consolidated financial Pharmaceuticals statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis,” which is located in the 2006 Form 10K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Use of Non-GAAP Measures 39 Major Global Sites and Principal Products This data book presents certain non-GAAP (U.S.
    [Show full text]