DOCSLIB.ORG

Poverty and Social Impact Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis Poverty and Social Impact Assessment Project Number: 47084 Grant No:XXXX September 2016 Republic of Indonesia: Community-Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project Prepared by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 2 September 2016) Currency Unit – rupiah (Rp) Rp1.00 = $0.000075 $1.00 = Rp13,280 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank APBN – AnggaranPendapatanBelanja Negara (Budget State) BAPPEDA – BadanPerencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Regional Development Planning Agency) BAPPENAS – BadanPerencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (National Development Planning Agency) BPN – BadanPertanahanNasional (National Land Agency) CBFM – community based forestry management CIF – Climate Investment Fund CSO – civil society organization DAD – DewanAdat Dayak (Dayak Tribal Council) DMF – design and monitoring framework FIP – Forest Investment Program KPH – KesatuanPengelolaanHutan (forest management unit) FPIC – free prior and informed consent GHG – greenhouse gas GOI – Government of Indonesia HH – Households HPH – HakPengusahaanHutan(Natural Forest Concession Holders) HTI – HutanTanamanIndustri (Industrial Forest Plantation) IP – indigenous peoples ITTO – International Tropical Timber Organization LULUCF – Land Use Land-Use Change and Forestry M&E – monitoring and evaluation MDG – Millennium Development Goal MOEF – Ministry of Environment and Forestry MOFor – Ministry of Forestry MOHA – Ministry of Home Affairs NGO – non-government organization NTFP – non timber forest products PPTA – project preparatory technical assistance RAN GRK – RencanaAksiNasional Gas RumahKaca (National Action Plan for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions) REDD+ – reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks RTRW – Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (Government Spatial Plan) SFM – sustainable forest management STRANAS – StrategiNasional REDD+ (Indonesia National REDD+ Strategy) TOR – term of reference CONTENTS I. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND ASSESSMENT METHODS .............................................1 A. Project Rationale .............................................................................................................1 B. Project Description: Project Impact, Outcome, and Outputs ............................................2 C. The Project Sites .............................................................................................................2 D. Approach and Methods for Poverty and Social Impact Assessment ................................5 II. CONTEXTUALIZING THE FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM (FIP) ................................7 A. National Context and Significance of the Kalimantan Region ..........................................7 1.National Perspective .....................................................................................................7 2.The Kalimantan Region ................................................................................................9 B. Social Survey Results .................................................................................................... 10 1.West Kalimantan ........................................................................................................ 10 2.Kapuas Hulu District ................................................................................................... 11 3.Sintang District ........................................................................................................... 14 III. STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT ................................................. 16 A. Stakeholder Identification .............................................................................................. 16 1.Primary Stakeholders ................................................................................................. 17 2.Secondary Stakeholders ............................................................................................. 23 B.Stakeholder Power Relations ......................................................................................... 24 IV. POVERTY ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................ 26 A. Framework for Poverty Assessment .............................................................................. 26 1.Poverty in Indonesia ................................................................................................... 26 2.Forest Resources and Poverty ................................................................................... 28 B. The Nature of Poverty at the Village Level ..................................................................... 30 1.Poverty, Land and Natural Resources ........................................................................ 30 2.Causes of Poverty at the Village Level ....................................................................... 30 V. SOCIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND MITIGATING MEASURES ............................................. 32 A. Overall Social Impacts and Strategies to Address Impacts ............................................ 32 1.Indigenous Peoples .................................................................................................... 32 2.Involuntary Resettlement ............................................................................................ 32 3.Impacts on Women ..................................................................................................... 37 B. Social Risks ................................................................................................................... 37 1.Labor .......................................................................................................................... 37 2.Affordability ................................................................................................................. 37 3.Communicable Diseases ............................................................................................ 38 C. Development of Action Plans ......................................................................................... 38 1.FIP Consultation and Participation Plan ...................................................................... 38 2.FIP Communications Plan .......................................................................................... 47 VI. MONITORING AND EVALUATION .................................................................................... 55 A. Targets and indicators ................................................................................................... 55 B. Monitoring and Evaluation Institutional Arrangements ................................................... 55 C. Monitoring Tools and General Procedures .................................................................... 56 VII. RECAPITULATION ON POVERTY AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT .................................... 58 A. On Beneficiaries ............................................................................................................ 58 B. On Key Poverty and Social Issues ................................................................................. 58 C. On Design Features ...................................................................................................... 59 1.Output 1: Community-focused and gender-responsive REDD+ pilot projects in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang districts implemented ......................................................................... 59 2.Output 2: Provincial REDD+ strategy in West Kalimantan effectively implemented .... 60 3.Output 3: Sub-national policies on carbon stock improvement harmonized with national policies .......................................................................................................................... 60 VIII. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 61 List of Tables Table 1. Initial Project-Participating Villages in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu ...................................4 Table 2. Identification and Brief Description of Sample Villages ..................................................7 Table 3. Administrative Units of West Kalimantan ..................................................................... 11 Table 4. Demographic indicators of Kapuas Hulu 2013 ............................................................. 12 Table 5. Demographic feature of villages in project areas ......................................................... 12 Table 6. Highest Education Level attained by Male and Female in Kapuas Hulu 2013.............. 12 Table 7. Education indicators of villages in direct project area .................................................. 13 Table 8. Villagers occupation in the direct project area ............................................................. 13 Table 9. Income and Expenditure Pattern of Villagers in Project Area ....................................... 13 Table 10. Assets possession by villagers .................................................................................. 14 Table 11. Demographic Indicators of Sintang District 2013 ....................................................... 14 Table 12. Education profile of villagers ...................................................................................... 15 Table 13. Villagers occupation in direct project area ................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/27/2021 05:58:04PM Via Free Access 130 Book Reviews
    Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde Vol. 165, no. 1 (2009), pp. 129–189 URL: http://www.kitlv-journals.nl/index.php/btlv URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-100095 Copyright: content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License ISSN: 0006-2294 Book reviews Johnny Tjia, A grammar of Mualang; An Ibanic language of West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Leiden: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics), 2007, 438 pp. ISBN 9789078328247. Price: EUR 32.27 (paperback). ALEXANDER ADELAAR Asia Institute, University of Melbourne [email protected] The traditional languages in Indonesia’s West Kalimantan Province are pre- dominantly Malayic and Bidayuhic (although some other language groups are also represented). Mualang belongs to the Ibanic branch of the Malayic lan- guage group and is spoken in the Belitang Hulu, Belitang Hilir and Belitang districts of Sekadau Regency (formerly part of Sanggau Regency). Based on purely linguistic criteria, it is clearly in a dialect relation with Iban, one of the main languages in Sarawak and a minority language in West Kalimantan. It is probably even more like Iban than some other Ibanic languages, which have not developed the diphthongs that are so typical of Iban and Mualang (for example, datay ‘come’; jalay ‘road’; tikay ‘mat’). Notable differences between the two varieties are that Iban does not exhibit nasal preplosion and postplo- sion (see below), and that Iban has acquired a transitive suffix –ka, whereas in Mualang this element is still a preposition. According to Tjia, another dif- ference is that in Iban mid vowels are phonemic whereas in Mualang they are allophones of high vowels, but this is just a matter of analysis, as Scott (1957) was able to show that Iban high and mid vowels were still allophones, in spite of the rather non-phonemic Iban spelling conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • FORUM MASYARAKAT ADAT DATARAN TINGGI BORNEO (FORMADAT) Borneo (Indonesia & Malaysia)
    Empowered lives. Resilient nations. FORUM MASYARAKAT ADAT DATARAN TINGGI BORNEO (FORMADAT) Borneo (Indonesia & Malaysia) Equator Initiative Case Studies Local sustainable development solutions for people, nature, and resilient communities UNDP EQUATOR INITIATIVE CASE STUDY SERIES Local and indigenous communities across the world are 126 countries, the winners were recognized for their advancing innovative sustainable development solutions achievements at a prize ceremony held in conjunction that work for people and for nature. Few publications with the United Nations Convention on Climate Change or case studies tell the full story of how such initiatives (COP21) in Paris. Special emphasis was placed on the evolve, the breadth of their impacts, or how they change protection, restoration, and sustainable management over time. Fewer still have undertaken to tell these stories of forests; securing and protecting rights to communal with community practitioners themselves guiding the lands, territories, and natural resources; community- narrative. The Equator Initiative aims to fill that gap. based adaptation to climate change; and activism for The Equator Initiative, supported by generous funding environmental justice. The following case study is one in from the Government of Norway, awarded the Equator a growing series that describes vetted and peer-reviewed Prize 2015 to 21 outstanding local community and best practices intended to inspire the policy dialogue indigenous peoples initiatives to reduce poverty, protect needed to take local success to scale, to improve the global nature, and strengthen resilience in the face of climate knowledge base on local environment and development change. Selected from 1,461 nominations from across solutions, and to serve as models for replication.
    [Show full text]
  • PT. Kayung Agro Lestari (Austindo Nusantara Jaya Agri Group) Ketapang Regency West Kalimantan Province Indonesia
    PT. Kayung Agro Lestari (Austindo Nusantara Jaya Agri Group) Ketapang Regency West Kalimantan Province Indonesia Summary of SEIA dan HCV Report January 2014 PT. Kayung Agro Lestari – January 2014 – Summary of SEIA and HCV Report 1 Summary of SEIA and HCV Assessment Report 1. Executive Summary PT Kayung Agro Lestari (PT KAL) has obtained an “Izin Lokasi” (location permit) No. 103 Tahun 2004, dated April 26th, 2004, signed by Bupati of Ketapang, covering area of 29.400 Ha, revised by “Izin Lokasi” No. 116 Tahun 2007, dated March 22nd, 2007, covering area of 20.000 Ha, has been extended by “Izin Lokasi” No. 400 Tahun 2007, dated November 8th, 2007, covering area of 18.754,90 Ha, and has been renewed by “Izin Lokasi” No. 62 Tahun 2010, dated February 2nd, covering area of 18.800 Ha. PT KAL located in Matan Hilir Utara Sub District, Ketapang Regency, West Kalimantan Province. Scope area of this SEIA Assessment is covering Kuala Satong Village, Kuala Tolak Village, and Laman Satong Village. This assessment conducted to identify the socio-economy condition of the community, issue, problems and the impact of company existence in their area. In 2013, PT KAL hired Fahutan IPB, lead by Dr. Ir, Nyoto Santoso, MS, a RSPO approved HCV Lead Assessor, to conduct HCV and SEIS Assessment with a team of experts. Based on the result of the HCV Assessment, there is no primary forest found in the area of PT KAL. The forests that still exist are in the form of young secondary forest, underbrush. In general, founded on the HCV Assessments, HCV 1.2 area of 3.545,45 Ha, HCV 1.3 area of 3.323,47 Ha, HCV 3 area of 2.988,10 Ha, HCV 4.1 area of 3.311,93 Ha, and HCV 4.2 area of 462,49 Ha.
    [Show full text]
  • 6D5n Lake Toba – Bohorok Tour
    Warmest Greetings from Universal Tour & Travel has been established since 1966 and is one of the leading Travel Company in Indonesia. Along with our experienced and professional managers and tour- guides in the year 2016, we are ready to serve you for the coming 50 years. We appreciate very much for your trust and cooperation to us in the past and are looking forward to your continued support in the future. We wish 2016 will bring luck and prosperity to all of us. Jakarta, 01 January 2016 The Management of Universal Tour & Travel Table of Contents - Introduction 3 - Company Profile 4 - Our Beautiful Indonesia 5 - Sumatera 6 - Java 16 - Bali 40 - Lombok 48 - Kalimantan 56 - Sulawesi 62 - Irian Jaya 71 3 Company Profile Registered Name : PT. Chandra Universal Travel (Universal Tour & Travel) Established on : August 26, 1966 License No. : 100/D.2/BPU/IV/79 Member of : IATA, ASITA, ASTINDO, EKONID Management - Chairman : Dipl Ing. W.K. Chang - Executive Director : Hanien Chang - Business Development Director : Hadi Saputra Kurniawan - Tour Manager : I Wayan Subrata - Asst. Tour Manager : Ika Setiawaty - Travel Consultant Manager : Nuni - Account Manager : Sandhyana Company Activities - Ticketing (Domestic and International) - Inbound Tours - Travel Documents - Domestic Tours - Car & Bus Rental - Outbound Tours - Travel Insurance - Hotel Reservation Universal Tour & Travel was founded by Mr. Chang Chean Cheng (Chandra Kusuma) on 26 August 1966 and member of IATA in 1968 respectively. In the year between 1966 -1970, there were around 200 travel agents with or without travel agent licence and around 35 IATA agents. Our company started from 8-12 staffs in charged for Ticketing, Inbound Tour and Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Kabupaten Dalam Angka Bengkayang 2021
    KABUPATEN BENGKAYANG DALAM ANGKA 2021 https://bengkayangkab.bps.go.id BADAN PUSAT STATISTIK KABUPATEN BENGKAYANG BPS-Statistics of Bengkayang Regency KABUPATEN BENGKAYANG DALAM ANGKA 2021 https://bengkayangkab.bps.go.id KABUPATEN BENGKAYANG DALAM ANGKA Bengkayang Regency in Figures 2021 ISSN: 2540-850X No. Publikasi/Publication Number: 61020.2101 Katalog /Catalog: 1102001.6102 Ukuran Buku/Book Size: 14,8 cm x 21 cm Jumlah Halaman/Number of Pages : xxxvi + 250 hal/pages Naskah/Manuscript: BPS Kabupaten Bengkayang BPS-Statistics of Bengkayang Regency Penyunting/Editor: BPS Kabupaten Bengkayang BPS-Statistics of Bengkayang Regency Desain Kover/Cover Design: Fungsi Integrasi Pengolahan dan Diseminasi Statistik Functionhttps://bengkayangkab.bps.go.id of Integration Processing and Statistics Dissemination Ilustrasi Kover/Cover Illustration: Tarian Tradisional Dayak/Dayak Traditional Dance Diterbitkan oleh/Published by: ©BPS Kabupaten Bengkayang/BPS-Statistics of Bengkayang Regency Dicetak oleh/Printed by: Badan Pusat Statistik Dilarang mengumumkan, mendistribusikan, mengomunikasikan, dan/atau menggandakan sebagian atau seluruh isi buku ini untuk tujuan komersil tanpa izin tertulis dari Badan Pusat Statistik. Prohibited to announce, distribute, communicate, and/or copy part or all of this book for commercial purpose without permission from BPS-Statistics Indonesia. TIM PENYUSUN / DRAFTING TEAM Penanggungjawab Umum/General in Charge: Amad Badar, SE, MM Penanggungjawab Publikasi/Publication General in Charge: Ilham Mauluddin,S.ST Pemeriksaan
    [Show full text]
  • Desa Subah Kecamatan Tayan Hilir Kabupaten Sanggau Dengan Desa Teluk Bakung Kecamatan Sungai Ambawang Kabupaten Kubu Raya
    Governance, Jurnal S-1 Ilmu Pemerintahan Volume 4 Nomor 3 Edisi September 2015 http://jurmafis.untan.ac.id PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN BATAS DAERAH ANTAR KABUPATEN DI PROVINSI KALIMANTAN BARAT Studi Kasus: Desa Subah Kecamatan Tayan Hilir Kabupaten Sanggau Dengan Desa Teluk Bakung Kecamatan Sungai Ambawang Kabupaten Kubu Raya Oleh: SHINTA DWIYUDIASIH NIM. E42009016 Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Kerjasama Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Tanjungpura dengan Pemerintah Provinsi Kalimantan Barat Tahun 2016 E-mail : [email protected] Abstrak Permasalahan yang terjadi adalah adanya beberapa faktor yakni faktor adat, faktor potensi kayu banyak dan faktor adanya lahan sawit dari perusahaan pembuka lahan yang dapat menyerap tenaga kerja dan memperoleh manfaat untuk pendapatan dari tanah wilayah tersebut. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui apa kebijakan yang harus dilakukan aparatur pemerintah dalam pelaksanaan koordinasi khususnya dalam penyelesaian perselisihan batas daerah antara Kabupaten Sanggau dan Kabupaten Kubu Raya. Jenis penelitian adalah deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik wawancara, teknik observasi, dan teknik dokumentasi. Subjek penelitian dipilih dengan purposive. Simpulan dari penelitian adalah penyelesaian perselisihan batas daerah ini terkesan lambat oleh pemerintah, baik itu Pemerintah Kabupaten maupun Pemerintah Provinsi, tentunya menjadikan ketidakpastian bagi masyarakat dan daerah yang mempunyai persoalan batas wilayah. Oleh karena itu, perlu segera dicarikan jalan penyelesaiannya yang terbaik untuk semuanya dan dalam hal ini dituntut keberanian pemerintah untuk mengambil kebijakan penyelesaian konflik batas wilayah yang berdasarkan landasan hukum yang berlaku. Dan yang lebih penting adalah bagaimana daerah yang berkonflik mengembangkan kerja sama antar daerah khususnya di Desa Subah Kecamatan Tayan Hilir Kabupaten Sanggau dengan Desa Teluk Bakung Kecamatan Sungai Ambawang Kabupaten Kubu Raya.
    [Show full text]
  • 05 SS14-070 Pieter the Molecular Lay-Akhir2nd
    Makara J. Sci. 19/1 (2015), 27-36 doi: 10.7454/mss.v19i1.4479 The Molecular Diversity-based ISSR of Durio tanjungpurensis Originating from West Kalimantan, Indonesia Pieter Agusthinus Riupassa 1,2 , Tatik Chikmawati 1*, Miftahudin 1, and Suharsono 1 1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor 16680, Indonesia 2. Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon 97233, Indonesia *E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Durian Tengkurak ( Durio tanjungpurensis Navia) is one of the endangered exotic species in the Malvaceae family. The species is important for conservation of the germplasm and is considered a potential genetic resource for the development of durian in the future. The objective of this research project was to assess the molecular diversity of D. tanjungpurensis in West Kalimantan, based on Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers. We applied ten ISSR primers to reveal the genetic diversity of 60 individuals from six natural endemic D. tanjungpurensis populations. The genetic diversity parameters were estimated based on binary data about PCR products (present or absent bands). The results showed that the mean number of observed alleles, the mean number of effective alleles, the genetic diversity, the Shannon’s Information Index score, the number of polymorphic loci, and the percentage of polymorphic loci were 1.53, 1.29, 0.17, 0.26, 77.83, and 52.59, respectively. An analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that the genetic diversity within a population (65%) was higher than that found between the populations (35%). UPGMA clustering and principal coordinate analysis, based on the DICE similarity matrix, were used to classify the populations into three groups: 1) Hutan Rejunak and Tembaga, 2) Bukit Merindang, and 3) Hutan Rawak, Bukit Sagu 1, and Bukit Sagu 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan
    Volume 9. No. 2 Nopember 2018 ISSN 2580 – 1058 Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan Sintang Vox Volume Nomor Halaman ISSN Nopember Edukasi 9 2 82 – 162 2580 – 1058 2018 ISSN 2580 – 1058 ISSN 2580 – 1058 SUSUNAN DEWAN REDAKSI V O X E D U K A S I JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN VOL. 9 No. 2 Nopember 2018 EDITOR IN CHIEF: Nelly Wedyawati, S.Si., M.Pd. (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) EDITOR: Anyan, M.Kom. (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) Thomas Joni Verawanto Aristo, M.Pd (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) REVIEWERS: Dr. Hilarius Jago Duda, S.Si., M.Pd. (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) Herpanus, S.P., M.A., Ph.D (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) Bintoro Nugroho, M.Si., Ph.D (Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak) Eliana Yunitha Seran, M.Pd. (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) Mardawani, M.Pd. (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) Dessy Triana Relita, M.Pd. (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) Alamat Redaksi Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang Kalimantan Barat Jl. Pertamina Sengkuang KM. 4 Kapuas Kanan Hulu Sintang Kalimantan Barat Kotak Pos 126, Kalbar, Hp/Telp. (0565) 2025366/085245229150/085245847748) Website:http://jurnal.stkipsintang.ac.id/indek.php/voxedukasi Email: [email protected]/[email protected] ISSN 2580 – 1058 ISSN 2580 – 1058 V O X E D U K A S I JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN VOL. 9 No. 2 Nopember 2018 DAFTAR ISI FUNGSI KODE DALAM PROGRAM ACARA “BELETER” TVRI KALBAR Mai Yuliastri Simarmata 82–90 Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia,
    [Show full text]
  • Pontianak Statement on Human Rights and Agribusiness in South East Asia
    PONTIANAK STATEMENT ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND AGRIBUSINESS IN SOUTH EAST ASIA The 75 participants in this conference, drawn from the National Human Rights Institutions (NHRI) from South East Asia, UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, the Executive Office of the President, the Government of Indonesia and from supportive civil society, indigenous representatives and international organisations, including from Nepal, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines and Thailand, met in Pontianak in West Kalimantan, Indonesia, between the 11th and 12th October 2017, to consider ways of ensuring State and Non-State actors respect, protect, fulfil and remedy human rights in the agribusiness sector. The meeting included representatives from Golden Agri-Resources, Asia Pulp and Paper and Sime Darby. The meeting was hosted by the National Human Rights Commission of Indonesia (KomnasHAM), Pusaka and LinkAR- Borneo, with the support of the Forest Peoples Programme. This meeting has been convened at a time when international concern about the human rights violations, land grabs and environmental destruction associated with the rapid expansion of agribusiness, especially in South East Asia, has reached new heights. New standards are emerging on the responsibilities of consumers, retail, manufacturers, traders and processors to trace their supply chains and ensure products do not embody malpractice. Discussions have begun at the UN on an international treaty on the extra-territorial obligations of host countries and transnational corporations. Civil society is drawing greater attention to corruption in land allocation for plantations and to the exploitation of workers, migrants, women and children on estates, and to the significant dangers faced by Human Rights Defenders working to secure community and indigenous rights.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Summary Report of SEIA and HCV Assessments on PT Kartika Prima
    Summary Report of SEIA and HCV Assessments on PT Kartika Prima Cipta Districts of Semitau, Suhaid, and Selimbau of Kapuas Hulu Regency, West Kalimantan Executive Summary PT Kartika Prima Cipta (hereinafter referred to as “PT KPC”) is located in Districts of Semitau, Suhaid and Selimbau of Kapuas Hulu Regency, West Kalimantan. Its business has already obtained a Location Permit by virtue of Kapuas Hulu Regent’s Decree No. 16 Year 2007 dated 23 January 2007, granting the company a concession over a total area of ±20,000 hectares. This decree’s period was extended by virtue of Kapuas Hulu Regent’s Decree No. 302 Year 2012 dated 01 October 2012, granting PT KPC a concession of ±19,200 hectares. An Environmental Impact Assessment document (“EIA”) has been prepared by a consulting firm, namely CV Intergraha Citra, which has also been authorised by Kapuas Hulu Regent based on Decree No. 290 Year 2006 on Environmental Feasibility of Oil Palm Plantation Activities of PT Kartika Prima Cipta in Semitau, Suhaid and Selimbau of Kapuas Hulu Regency. PT KPC already has a Social Impact Assessment (“SIA”) document in its possession, internally prepared by PT Smart, Tbk.’s team of five headed by Mr Yosaphat Ardhilla Renato, S.Ant, which has already been registered under RSPO Approved High Conservation Value (“HCV”) Assessors and acknowledged as individuals having specific skills on socio-economic and cultural matters, as well as conflict resolution. PT KPC has already conducted a High Conservation Value (“HCV”) assessment in its concession. Based on the HCV assessment, there are eight (8) HCV types identified as existing within the management unit’s concession, namely HCV 1 (HCV 1.1, HCV 1.2 and HCV 1.3); HCV 2 (HCV 2.3), HCV 3, HCV 4 (HCV 4.1 and HCV 4.3), and HCV5), making together a total HCV area of 7,514.49 hectares.
    [Show full text]
  • Zones Infectées Au 21 Décembre 1972
    - 4 9 8 DISEASES SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS - MALADIES SOUMISES AU RÈGLEMENT Infected Areas as on 21 December 1972 — Zones infectées au 21 décembre 1972 For cntena used is compiling this list, sec page 286 — Les entires appliques pour la compilation de cette liste sont publiés à la page 286. X Newly reported areas — Nouvelles zones signalées. PLAGUE - PESTE GHANA Gaya District Tamil Nadu State Central Region Hazartbagh District Chmgleput Distnct Airica — Afrique Eastern Région Monghyr District Kanyakuman District Western Région Muzaffarpur District Madurai District LESOTHO LIBERIA — LIBÉRIA Patna District Malabar District Maseru District Santa! Parganas District North Arcoc District Monrovia (P) (excl. A) Saran District Morija Cape Mount County Uttar Pradesh Slate MADAGASCAR NIGERIA - NIGÉRIA Goa, Daman & Diu Territory Allahabad Distnct Fianaranisoa Province Goa District Bahratch District East-Central State Banda Distnct Ambositra S. Prêf. Lagos State Gujarat Slate Bara Bank! District X Andtna Canton North-Central State Ahmedabad District Bareilly Distnct Western State Tananarive Province Baroda District Jhansi District Andranomanalina S, Prêf. SENEGAL - SÉNÉGAL Broach District Kanpur District Junagadh District Isouy Canton Région du Cap-Vert Lucknow District Région du Diourbel Kaira District Mirzapur District Miarmarivo S. Prêf. Mchsana District Pratapgarh District Analavory Canton L o u p Département Rajkot District Rae Bareli District Soavuumdriana S. Prêf Région du Fleuve Surat District Sitapur District Ampcfy Canton Dagana Département Surendranagar District Unnao Distnct Dagana Dép.: Saint-Louis Varanasi District Tsiraanomandidy S. Prêf Haryana State Podor Département West Bengal State Gurgaon District X Bcvato Canton TOGO Burdwan District Mahasolo Canton Hissar District Région centrale Jind District Howrah Distnct a n z a n ia u n it e d r e p o f Nadia District T .
    [Show full text]
  • The Srategy of Suistanable Agriculture Development in the Border Region of West Kalimantan Support Food Security
    PROCEEDING OF INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP AND SEMINAR Innovation of Environmental-Friendly Agricultural Technology Supporting Sustainable Food Self-Sufficiency ISBN 978-602-344-252-2, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3345877 The srategy of suistanable agriculture development in the border region of West Kalimantan support food security Rusli Burhansyah1* 1West Kalimantan Assessment Institute for Agriculture Tehnology Pontianak Regency, West Kalimantan, Indonesia *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Intensive agricultural development has an ecological impact by decreasing the productivity of land and plants. The natural resource potential of both food and livestock crops in the border region of West Kalimantan has the potential to be a producer of sustainable agriculture. Food products in this area partially implement sustainable agriculture. Sustainable agricultural development strategies include; provide understanding, counseling, demonstration plots to the community. Steps to strengthen food security include; increased food production capacity, revitalization and restructuring of food institutions, food independent village development. The strategy pursued through local germplasm exploration, technology availability, extension systems. Keywords: sustainable agriculture, availability of technology and extension systems INTRODUCTION The green revolution of the 1960s and 1970s that resulted in dramatic increases in yields in developing countries in Asia, now shows a decrease in productivity. Intensive agriculture carried out without adherence
    [Show full text]