Springer Series in Optical Sciences Volume 11 Edited by David L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Springer Series in Optical Sciences Volume 11 Edited by David L Springer Series in Optical Sciences Volume 11 Edited by David L. MacAdam Springer Series in Optical Sciences Edited by David L. MacAdam Editorial Board: J. M. Enoch D. L. MacAdam A. L. Schawlow T. Tamir Volume Solid-State Laser Engineering By W. Koechner Volume 2 Table ofLaser Lines in Gases and Vapors 2nd Edition By R. Beck, W. Englisch, and K. Gürs Volume 3 Tunable Lasers and Applications Editors: A. Mooradian, T. Jaeger, and P. Stokseth Volume 4 Nonlinear Laser Spectroscopy By V. S. Letokhov and V. P. Chebotayev Volume 5 Optics and Lasers An Engineering Physics Approach By M. Young Volume 6 Photoelectron Statistics With Applications to Spectroscopy and Optical Communication By B. Saleh Volume 7 Laser Spectroscopy III Editors: J. L. Hall and J. L. Carlsten Volume 8 Frontiers in Visual Science Editors: S. J. Cool and E. L. Smith III Volume 9 High-Power Lasers and Applications Editors: K.-L. Kompa and H. Walther Volume 10 Detection of Optical and Infrared Radiation By R. H. Kingston Volume 11 Matrix Theory of Photoelasticity By P. S. Theocaris and E. E. Gdoutos Volume 12 The Monte Carlo Method in Atmospheric Optics By G. 1. Marchuk, G. A. Mikhailov, M. A. Nazaraliev, R. A. Darbinjan, B. A. Kargin, and B. S. Elepov Volume 13 PhysiologicalOptics By Y. Le Grand and S. G. EI Hage Volume 14 Laser Crystals Physics and Properties By A. A. Kaminskii Volume 15 X-Ray Spectroscopy By B. K. Agarwal Volume 16 Holographie Interferometry From the Scope of Deformation Analysis of Opaque Bodies By W. Schumann and M. Dubas P. S. Theocaris E. E. Gdoutos Matrix Theory of Photoelasticity With 93 Figures Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH 1979 Professor PERICLES S. THEOCARIS, D.Se. Professor EMMANUEL E. GDOUTOS, Ph.D. Athens National Technical University, Athens, Greece Editorial Board JAY M. ENOCH, Ph. D. Department of Opthalmology, J. Hillis MiIIer Health Center University of Florida, P.O. Box 733 Gainesville, FL 32610, USA DAVID L. MACADAM, Ph. D. 68 Hammond Street, Rochester, NY 14615, USA ART L. SCHAWLOW, Ph. D. Department of Physics, Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305, USA THEODOR TA MIR, Ph. D. 981 East Lawn Drive, Teaneck, NJ 07666, USA Library ofCongress Cataloging in Publication Data. Theocaris, Pericles S 1921-. Matrix theory of photoelasticity. (Springer series in optical sciences; v. 11) Bibliography: p. IncIudes·index. 1. Photoelasticity. I. Gdoutos, E. E., 1948-. joint author. H. Title. TA418.12.T48 620.1'1295 78-14275 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is eoneerned, speeifieally those of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, broadcasting, reproduction by photoeopying machine or similar means, and storage in data banks. Under § 54 of the German Copyright Law, where eopies are made for other than private use, a fee is payable to the publisher, the amount of the fee to be determined by agreement with the publisher. ISBN 978-3-662-15807-4 ISBN 978-3-540-35789-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-35789-6 © by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1979 Originally published by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York in 1979. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1 st edition 1979 The use of registered names, trademarks, ete. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and thefore free for general use. 2153/3130-543210 Preface Photoelasticity as an experimental method for analyzing stress fields in mechanics was developed in the early thirties by the pioneering works of Mesnager in France and Coker and Filon in England. Almost concurrently, Föppl, Mesmer, and Oppel in Germany contributed significantly to what turned out to be an amazing development. Indeed, in the fifties and sixties a tremendous number of scientific papers and monographs appeared, all over the world, dealing with various aspects of the method and its applications in experimental stress analysis. All of these contributions were based on the so-called Neumann-Maxwell stress-opticallaw; they were developed by means of the classical methods of vector analysis and analytic geometry, using the conventionallight-vector concept. This way of treating problems of mechanics by photoelasticity indicated many shortcomings and drawbacks of this classical method, especially when three-dimensional problems of elasticity had to be treated and when complicated load and geometry situations existed. Meanwhile, the idea of using the Poincare sphere for representing any polarization profile in photoelastic applications was introduced by Robert in France and Aben in the USSR, in order to deal with problems of polarization oflight passing through aseries of optical elements (retarders andjor rotators). Although the Poincare-sphere presentation of any polarization profile con­ stitutes a powerful and elegant method, it exhibits the difficulty of requiring manipulations in three-dimensional space, on the surface of the unit sphere. However, other graphical methods have been developed to bypass this difficulty. By a parallel projection of the points of the sphere on its equatorial plane, Kuske developed the j-circle method; Aben and others used the stereographic projection connected with the Wulff net, which maps polarization states so as to preserve angles. Another type of mapping, based on the Lambert-Schmidt projection, which preserves areas is currently under development by Theocaris. Concurrently with these graphical methods, some analytical methods were developed, based on the Stokes and J ones vectors that are extensively used in crystallography. These methods are the powerful Mueller and Jones calculi. Finally, the analytical method based on quaternia, which uses the Pauli spin matrices should also be mentioned. All ofthese modern graphical and analytical methods have been developed by use of various techniques based either on conventional light-vector concept, using vector calculus, or on matrix methods. However, no unified method exists to date that incorporates all of these modern ideas. VI Preface The purpose of this book is to present a novel and unified interpretation of all of the problems of two- and three-dimensional photoelasticity by use of the modern methods of description of polarized light, based on the concepts of the Poincare sphere, as weIl as on Mueller and Jones calculi. Although these powerful methods were conceived many years ago, only in the last two decades they have been applied in the solution of current problems of photoelasticity. The simplicity and elegance of these methods enable one to solve complicated problems in straightforward and comprehensive manners and to devise simple solutions of complex problems that, because of their nature, could not be solved by use of classical methods. Furthermore, although the Poincare-sphere representation can help enormously to visualize and formulate problems and theorems in a qualitative manner, geometrie mani­ pulations that involve spherical trigonometry and the simple and efficient procedures of matrix analysis, provide accurate results in the sequence. This book, as conceived here, is based on matrix theory, because this power­ ful calculus was judged to be the most suitable for the presentation, in a simple and unified manner, of all of the theorems related to these methods. Thus, apart from the fact that this monograph is the first to exhibit all of these new methods, based on the Poincare sphere, and on Jones and Mueller calculi, it reformulates already-known theorems ofphotoelasticity and derives others on the basis of the present approach. This book is intended to be an instrument of learning, rather than a review of contributions in these modern techniques related to photoelasticity. There­ fore, from the great number of papers and monographs published on photo­ elastidty, we have selected only those that seemed to suit the purpose of this book. Likewise, references and the bibliography at the end of the book are limited to papers that are closely related to the subjects treated in this monograph. Particular care was taken throughout the book to give clear, straightforward, and simple presentations of the various topics. The authors hope that the monograph will be used as a basis on wh ich the future researcher and student can develop his own new and fruitful ideas and promote research in formula­ tion of problems of photoelasticity by matrices, which, despite its significance, has been given little attention as yet. FinaIly, the authors are particularly indebted to Mr. Constantin Thireos, Assistantat the Laboratory, who prepared the groundwork ofthe bibliography contained at the end of the book and who also contributed in the preparation of the manuscript. Athens, Greece P. S. THEOCARIS· E. E. GDOUTOS September, 1978 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Electromagnetic Theory of Light 6 2.1 The Nature of Light 6 2.2 Maxwell's Equations 8 2.3 Propagation of Eleetromagnetie Waves in Isotropie Media 9 2.4 Propagation of Eleetromagnetie Waves in Anisotropie Media 11 2.4.1 The Fresnel Ellipsoid . 13 2.4.2 Uniaxial and Biaxial Crystals 17 Referenees 19 3. Description of Polarized Light 20 3.1 Introduetion .... 20 3.2 Ordinary and Polarized Light 21 3.3 Forms of Polarized Light 22 3.4 Deseription of Polarized Light 24 3.4.1 Vectorial Representation 25 Linear Polarization . 25 Circular Polarization 26 Elliptical Polarization 26 3.4.2 The Poineare Sphere 31 3.4.3 The j Circle 33 3.4.4 The Stokes Vector 34 3.4.5 The Jones Veetor 36 3.5 Relationship Between the Methods of Charaeterization of a Polarized Light . 41 3.5.1 The Poineare Sphere and the j Circle 41 3.5.2 The Poincare Sphere and the Stokes Vector 42 3.5.3 The Stokes and Jones Vectors .... 42 3.6 Discussion of the Methods of Characterization of Polarized Light 43 Referenees .
Recommended publications
  • Polarization Optics Polarized Light Propagation Partially Polarized Light
    The physics of polarization optics Polarized light propagation Partially polarized light Polarization Optics N. Fressengeas Laboratoire Mat´eriaux Optiques, Photonique et Syst`emes Unit´ede Recherche commune `al’Universit´ede Lorraine et `aSup´elec Download this document from http://arche.univ-lorraine.fr/ N. Fressengeas Polarization Optics, version 2.0, frame 1 The physics of polarization optics Polarized light propagation Partially polarized light Further reading [Hua94, GB94] A. Gerrard and J.M. Burch. Introduction to matrix methods in optics. Dover, 1994. S. Huard. Polarisation de la lumi`ere. Masson, 1994. N. Fressengeas Polarization Optics, version 2.0, frame 2 The physics of polarization optics Polarized light propagation Partially polarized light Course Outline 1 The physics of polarization optics Polarization states Jones Calculus Stokes parameters and the Poincare Sphere 2 Polarized light propagation Jones Matrices Examples Matrix, basis & eigen polarizations Jones Matrices Composition 3 Partially polarized light Formalisms used Propagation through optical devices N. Fressengeas Polarization Optics, version 2.0, frame 3 The physics of polarization optics Polarization states Polarized light propagation Jones Calculus Partially polarized light Stokes parameters and the Poincare Sphere The vector nature of light Optical wave can be polarized, sound waves cannot The scalar monochromatic plane wave The electric field reads: A cos (ωt kz ϕ) − − A vector monochromatic plane wave Electric field is orthogonal to wave and Poynting vectors
    [Show full text]
  • Outline • Types of Polarization • Jones' Matrices • Birefringence • Polarizing Optical Components • Polarization in Scattering
    Polarization Ivan Bazarov Cornell Physics Department / CLASSE Outline • Types of polarization • Jones’ matrices • Birefringence • Polarizing optical components • Polarization in scattering 1 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Polarization ellipse For light traveling along z direction: k E = vB ⇥ with a complex amplitude: The electric field traces out an ellipse: 2 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Polarization ellipse Polarization types: • linearly polarized light • circularly polarized light • unpolarized light (non-laser) 3 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Linear & circular polarizations linearly polarized light circularly polarized light Right CCW Left CW 4 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Unpolarized light? Unpolarized light means random (time-changing) polarization direction, e.g. excited atoms in a solid (a light bulb) emit randomly polarized light packets. 5 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Jones vector We can represent any monochromatic wave polarization as a Jones’ vector: For normalized intensity : E.g. orthogonal polarizations whenever J0 J =0 1 · 2 6 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Exercises Ex1: Check that HLP and VLP are orthogonal as well as RCP and LCP. Q: What does it mean? A: can use either as a basis to represent arbitrary polarization! Ex2: How to obtain the light intensity from its Jones vector (if in vacuum)? Ax 2 2 J0 J =[Ax⇤ Ay⇤] = Ax + Ay · Ay | | | | 7 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Jones matrix (don’t work with unpolarized light!) Normal modes: TJ = µJ 8 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Combining polarization devices & tilt Simply multiply the matrices in the reverse order: T1 T2 T3 T = T3T2T1 If polarization device is rotated, use: Proof: using , we get 9 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Linear polarizer Linear polarizer in x-direction A polarizer rotated by angle q 10 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Polarization retarders or wave plates These devices do not affect one polarization component (fast axis) but add a retarding phase to the other component (slow axis).
    [Show full text]
  • Instrumental Optics
    Instrumental optics lecture 3 13 March 2020 Lecture 2 – summary 1. Optical materials (UV, VIS, IR) 2. Anisotropic media (ctd) • Double refraction 2. Anisotropic media • Refractive index: no, ne() • Permittivity tensor • Birefringent materials – calcite, • Optical axis YVO4, quartz • Ordinary wave Polarization perpendicular to o.a.-푘 plane • Extraordinary wave Polarization in o.a.-푘 plane • Birefringent walk-off 3. Polarization of light • Wave vector ellipsoid • states of polarization Polarization of light linear circular elliptical 휋 휋 Δ휙 = 0, sin Θ = 퐸 /퐸 Δ휙 = , 퐸 = 퐸 Δ휙 ∈ (0, ) 푦 푥 2 푥 푦 2 Plane wave, 푘||푧, 푧 = const: • Fully polarized light 푖(휔푡+휙푥) 퐸푥(푡) 퐸0푥푒 퐸0푥 • Partially polarized light 푖(휔푡+휙 ) i(휔푡+휙푥) iΔ휙 퐸 푡 = 퐸푦(푡) = 퐸 푒 푦 =e 퐸 e • Fully depolarized light 0푦 0푦 0 0 0 Δ휙 = 휙푦 − 휙푥 Note: electric polarization 푃(퐸) vs. polarization of a wave! Linear polarizers Key parameter: Other parameters: 퐼 extinction coefficient, 푦 • Spectral range, 퐼푥 • damage threshold, (assumption: incident light is • angle of incidence, unpolarized!) • beam geometry For polarizing beamsplitters: 2 extinction coefficients, reflection typically worse • clear aperture Polarizer types: • Dichroic • Crystalline • Thin-film Dichroic polarizers Dichroic polarizer: • Made from material with anisotropic absorption (or reflection) coefficient long, „conductive” molecules/structures • Polaroid: polyvinyl alcohol + iodine – one polarization component is absorbed. • Cheap, large aperture, broadband, poor extinction, low damage threshold • Wire grid / nanowire:
    [Show full text]
  • Lab #6 Polarization
    EELE482 Fall 2014 Lab #6 Lab #6 Polarization Contents: Pre-laboratory exercise 2 Introduction 2 1. Polarization of the HeNe laser 3 2. Polarizer extinction ratio 4 3. Wave Plates 4 4. Pseudo Isolator 5 References 5 Polarization Page 1 EELE482 Fall 2014 Lab #6 Pre-Laboratory Exercise Bring a pair of polarized sunglasses or other polarized optics to measure in the lab. Introduction The purpose of this lab it to gain familiarity with the concept of polarization, and with various polarization components including glass-film polarizers, polarizing beam splitters, and quarter wave and half wave plates. We will also investigate how reflections can change the polarization state of light. Within the paraxial limit, light propagates as an electromagnetic wave with transverse electric and magnetic (TEM) field directions, where the electric field component is orthogonal to the magnetic field component, and to the direction of propagation. We can account for this vector (directional) nature of the light wave without abandoning our scalar wave treatment if we assume that the x^ -directed electric field component and y^ -directed electric field component are independent of each other. This assumption is valid within the paraxial approximation for isotropic linear media. The “polarization” state of the light wave describes the relationship between these x^ -directed and y^ -directed components of the wave. If the light wave is monochromatic, the x and y components must have a fixed phase relationship to each other. If the tip of the electric field vector E = Ex x^ + Ey y^ were observed over time at a particular z plane, one would see that it traces out an ellipse.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Measuring the Polarization of Light: from Jones Matrices to Ellipsometry
    MODELING AND MEASURING THE POLARIZATION OF LIGHT: FROM JONES MATRICES TO ELLIPSOMETRY OVERALL GOALS The Polarization of Light lab strongly emphasizes connecting mathematical formalism with measurable results. It is not your job to understand every aspect of the theory, but rather to understand it well enough to make predictions in a variety of experimental situations. The model developed in this lab will have parameters that are easily experimentally adjustable. Additionally, you will refine your predictive models by accounting for systematic error sources that occur in the apparatus. The overarching goals for the lab are to: Model the vector nature of light. (Week 1) Model optical components that manipulate polarization (e.g., polarizing filters and quarter-wave plates). (Week 1) Measure a general polarization state of light. (Week 1) Model and measure the reflection and transmission of light at a dielectric interface. (Week 2) Perform an ellipsometry measurement on a Lucite surface. WEEK 1 PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS Question 1 Set up the optical arrangement shown in Figure 1. It consists of (1) a laser, (2) Polarizing filters, (3) A quarter-wave plate (4) A photodetector. Observe the variation in the photodetector voltage as you rotate the polarizing filters and/or quarter-wave plate. This is as complicated as the apparatus gets. The challenge of week 1 is to build accurate models of these components and model their combined effect in an optical system. An understanding of polarized light and polarizing optical elements forms the foundation of many optical applications including AMO experiments such as magneto-optical traps, LCD displays, and 3D projectors.
    [Show full text]
  • OPTI 484/584: Polarized Light and Polarimetry Effective Spring 2015 Replaces: OPTI 623 Course Description
    OPTI 484/584: Polarized Light and Polarimetry Effective Spring 2015 Replaces: OPTI 623 Course Description: Polarized light and the Poincare sphere. Polarization in natural scenes and animal vision. Polarization elements: polarizers, retarders, and depolarizers. Jones and Mueller polarization calculus. Polarimetry: measuring the polarization properties of optical elements and materials. Polarization modulators and controllers. Polarization dependent loss and polarization mode dispersion in fiber optics. Advanced polarization issues in optical devices and systems. Pre-requisites: OPTI 501: Electromagnetic Waves/OPTI 330: Physical Optics II, or equivalent Number of Units/ component: 3 units/ lecture Locations and Times: T/R: 2:00 – 3:15 pm, Meinel Optical Sciences room 305 Instructor Information: Russell A. Chipman, Professor College of Optical Sciences, Room 737 The University of Arizona 1630 East University Boulevard Tucson, AZ 85721 Phone: 520-626-9435 [email protected] Expected Learning Outcomes: 1. Understand the relationship and differences between the Jones vector and Stokes parameter descriptions for polarized light. 2. Explain the operation of polarizers and retarders. 3. Be able to measure Stokes parameters and interpret Stokes images. 4. Understand the difference between linear retarders, elliptical retarders, and circular retarders and their Jones and Mueller matrices. 5. Describe five ways to electrically control polarization state. 6. Explain how liquid crystal displays can be fabricated from Twisted Nematic cells and VAN-mode cells. Required Texts: Course Notes: The instructor’s notes are used as the text and will be distributed periodically throughout the term. No other texts are required. Course notes are not available in electronic form. Notes are not to be copied or scanned into electronic form.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on Jones Transmission Matrices from Time-Reversal
    Constraints on Jones transmission matrices from time-reversal invariance and discrete spatial symmetries N.P. Armitage1 1The Institute for Quantum Matter, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA (Dated: May 23, 2014) Optical spectroscopies are most often used to probe dynamical correlations in materials, but they are also a probe of symmetry. Polarization anisotropies are of course sensitive to structural anisotropies, but have been much less used as a probe of more exotic symmetry breakings in ordered states. In this paper a Jones transfer matrix formalism is discussed to infer the existence of exotic broken symmetry states of matter from their electrodynamic response for a full complement of possible broken symmetries including reflection, rotation, rotation-reflection, inversion, and time- reversal. A specific condition to distinguish the case of macroscopic time-reversal symmetry breaking is particularly important as in a dynamical experiment like optics, one must distinguish reciprocity from time-reversal symmetry as dissipation violates strict time-reversal symmetry of an experiment. Different forms of reciprocity can be distinguished, but only one is a sufficient (but not necessary) condition for macroscopic time-reversal symmetry breaking. I show the constraints that a Jones matrix develops under the presence or absence of such symmetries. These constraints typically appear in the form of an algebra relating matrix elements or overall constraints (transposition, unitarity, hermiticity, normality, etc.) on the form of the Jones matrix. I work out a number of examples including the trivial case of a ferromagnet, and the less trivial cases of magnetoelectrics and vector and scalar spin “chiral” states.
    [Show full text]
  • Polarized Light
    Subscriptions Newsletter Site Demo Librarians Help/FAQs About Contributors Consulting Editors Contact Log In Advanced Search About Search Physics > Electromagnetic radiation > Physics > Optics > For further study: Print View | Email a Link | Bookmark Polarized light ENCYCLOPEDIA ARTICLES Dynamic nuclear polarization Contents [Hide] The creation of assemblies of nuclei - Types of polarized light - Analyzing devices whose spin axes are not oriented at - Law of Malus - Retardation theory - Linear polarizing devices - Bibliography random, and which are in a steady - Polarization by scattering state that is not a state of thermal...... - Production of polarized light Read Article View all 3 related articles... Light which has its electric vector oriented in a predictable fashion with respect to the propagation direction. In unpolarized light, the vector is oriented in a random, unpredictable fashion. Even in short time intervals, it appears to RESEARCH UPDATES be oriented in all directions with equal probability. Most light sources seem to be partially polarized so that some Frozen light fraction of the light is polarized and the remainder unpolarized. It is actually more difficult to produce a completely unpolarized beam of light than one which is completely polarized. Ultraslow light was first observed by L. V. Hau and her colleagues in 1998. The polarization of light differs from its other properties in that human sense organs are essentially unable to detect Light pulses were slowed in a the presence of polarization. The Polaroid Corporation with its polarizing sunglasses and camera filters has made Bose-Einstein condensate of sodium to millions of people conscious of phenomena associated with polarization. Light from a rainbow is completely linearly only.....
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Jones Matrix Method for Homogeneous Biaxial Samples Noe Ortega-Quijano, Julien Fade, Mehdi Alouini
    Generalized Jones matrix method for homogeneous biaxial samples Noe Ortega-Quijano, Julien Fade, Mehdi Alouini To cite this version: Noe Ortega-Quijano, Julien Fade, Mehdi Alouini. Generalized Jones matrix method for homoge- neous biaxial samples. Optics Express, Optical Society of America - OSA Publishing, 2015, 23 (16), pp.20428-20438. 10.1364/OE.23.020428. hal-01181354 HAL Id: hal-01181354 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01181354 Submitted on 8 Aug 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Generalized Jones matrix method for homogeneous biaxial samples Noe´ Ortega-Quijano,∗ Julien Fade, and Mehdi Alouini Institut de Physique de Rennes, CNRS, Universite´ de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, 35 042 Rennes, France ∗[email protected] Abstract: The generalized Jones matrix (GJM) is a recently introduced tool to describe linear transformations of three-dimensional light fields. Based on this framework, a specific method for obtaining the GJM of uniaxial anisotropic media was recently presented. However, the GJM of biaxial media had not been tackled so far, as the previous method made use of a simplified rotation matrix that lacks a degree of freedom in the three-dimensional rotation, thus being not suitable for calculating the GJM of biaxial media.
    [Show full text]
  • Polarization of Light Thursday, 11/09/2006 Physics 158 Peter Beyersdorf
    Polarization of Light Thursday, 11/09/2006 Physics 158 Peter Beyersdorf Document info 1 Class Outline Polarization of Light Polarization basis’ Jones Calculus 16. 2 Polarization The Electric field direction defines the polarization of light Since light is a transverse wave, the electric field can point in any direction transverse to the direction of propagation Any arbitrary polarization state can be considered as a superposition of two orthogonal polarization states (i.e. it can be described in different bases) 16. 3 Electric Field Direction Light is a transverse electromagnetic wave so the electric (and magnetic) field oscillates in a direction transverse to the direction of propagation Possible states of electric field polarization are Linear electric field Circular plane wave Elliptical Random 4 Examples of polarization states right hand circular horizontal (CW as seen from observer) left hand circular vertical (CCW as seen from observer) linear polarization at an elliptical arbitrary angle 16. 5 Linear Polarization Basis Any polarization state can be described as the sum of two orthogonal linear polarization states i(kz ωt+φx) Ex(z, t) = E0xˆie − i(kz ωt+φy ) Ey(z, t) = E0yˆje − ! iφxˆ iφy ˆ i(kz ωt) E(z, t) = Ex(z,!t) + Ey(z, t) = E0xe i + E0ye j e − " # ! !E0y=0 ! E0x=0 E0y=E0x E0y=-E0x y y y y x x x horizontal vertical diagonal diagonal φ φ φx=φy+π x= y 16. 6 Circular Polarization iφx iφy i(kz ωt) E(z, t) = E0xe ˆi + E0ye ˆj e − " # Fo!r the case |φx-φy|=π/2 the magnitude of the field doesn’t change, but the direction sweeps out a circle The polarization is said Left-Handed Right-Handed to be right-handed if y y it progresses clockwise as seen by an observer looking into the light.
    [Show full text]
  • PO18 Physical Optics 7 Polarization.Pdf
    Physical Optics Lecture 7: Polarization 2018-05-23 Herbert Gross www.iap.uni-jena.de 2 Physical Optics: Content No Date Subject Ref Detailed Content Complex fields, wave equation, k-vectors, interference, light propagation, 1 11.04. Wave optics G interferometry Slit, grating, diffraction integral, diffraction in optical systems, point spread 2 18.04. Diffraction G function, aberrations Plane wave expansion, resolution, image formation, transfer function, 3 25.04. Fourier optics G phase imaging Quality criteria and Rayleigh and Marechal criteria, Strehl ratio, coherence effects, two-point 4 02.05. G resolution resolution, criteria, contrast, axial resolution, CTF Energy, momentum, time-energy uncertainty, photon statistics, 5 09.05. Photon optics K fluorescence, Jablonski diagram, lifetime, quantum yield, FRET Temporal and spatial coherence, Young setup, propagation of coherence, 6 16.05. Coherence K speckle, OCT-principle Introduction, Jones formalism, Fresnel formulas, birefringence, 7 23.05. Polarization G components Atomic transitions, principle, resonators, modes, laser types, Q-switch, 8 30.05. Laser K pulses, power Basics of nonlinear optics, optical susceptibility, 2nd and 3rd order effects, 9 06.06. Nonlinear optics K CARS microscopy, 2 photon imaging Apodization, superresolution, extended depth of focus, particle trapping, 10 13.06. PSF engineering G confocal PSF Introduction, surface scattering in systems, volume scattering models, 11 20.06. Scattering L calculation schemes, tissue models, Mie Scattering 12 27.06. Gaussian beams G Basic description, propagation through optical systems, aberrations Laguerre-Gaussian beams, phase singularities, Bessel beams, Airy 13 04.07. Generalized beams G beams, applications in superresolution microscopy 14 11.07. Miscellaneous G Coatings, diffractive optics, fibers K = Kempe G = Gross L = Lu 3 Contents .
    [Show full text]
  • PDF (Chapter 1. Electromagnetic Theory)
    1 Electromagnetic Theory 1.0 INTRODUCTION In this chapter we derive some of the basic results concerning the propagation of plane, single-frequency, electromagnetic waves in homogeneous isotropic media, as well as in anisotropic crystal media. Starting with Maxwell's equa- tions we obtain expressions for the dissipation, storage, and transport of energy resulting from the propagation of waves in material media. We con­ sider in some detail the phenomenon of birefringence, in which the phase velocity of a plane wave in a crystal depends on its direction of polarization. The two allowed modes of propagation in uniaxial crystals—the "ordinary" and "extraordinary" rays—are discussed using the formalism of the index ellipsoid. 1.1 COMPLEX-FUNCTION FORMALISM In problems that involve sinusoidally varying time functions, we can save a great deal of manipulation and space by using the complex-function for­ malism. As an example consider the function (1.1-1) where ω is the circular (radian) frequency1 and Φa is the phase. Defining the complex amplitude of a(t) by (1.1-2) 1The radian frequency ω is to be distinguished from the real frequency v = ω/2π. 1 2 ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY we can rewrite (1.1-1) as (1.1-3) We will often represent a(t) by (1.1-4) instead of by (1.1-1) or (1.1-3). This, of course, is not strictly correct so that when this happens it is always understood that what is meant by (1.1-4) is the real part of Aexp(iωt). In most situations the replacement of (1.1-3) by the complex form (1.1-4) poses no problems.
    [Show full text]