DOCSLIB.ORG

A Case of an Optic Pit Abstract Optic Pits Can Be Congenital Or Acquired in Nature. Congenital Pits Are Typically Temporal and R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Case of an Optic Pit Abstract Optic Pits Can Be Congenital Or Acquired in Nature. Congenital Pits Are Typically Temporal and R A Case of an Optic Pit Abstract Optic pits can be congenital or acquired in nature. Congenital pits are typically temporal and round in shape. Recently, it has been reported that acquired optic pits are commonly found in eyes with pathological myopia. I. Case History Patient HF was a pleasant 9-year-old African American female that presented complaining of blurry vision in the left eye. She denied headaches or double vision. Her mother reported that HF saw an ophthalmologist at a community health center earlier in the year where she was given glasses that HF lost 2 months ago. She had no pertinent medical history or family history, was not taking any medications, and has no known drug allergies. II. Pertinent findings A full comprehensive eye exam was completed on HF. Her uncorrected presenting visual acuities were 20/25 OD and 20/400 at 40cm OS in the distance and 20/20 OD and 4/200 OS at near. Pinhole testing showed no improvement in the left eye. Gross examination revealed a large sensory angle esotropia and hypertropia in the left eye. We were unable to measure the magnitude deviation as the eye was constantly drifting and wasn’t able to fixate a target for cover test. The left esotropia and hypertropia were confirmed with Bruckner testing. Her pupils were both equal, round and reactive to light with no APD noted. EOMs were full in the right eye, and there was some over action of the medial rectus in the left eye. HF failed global and local stereopsis testing. The right eye was refracted to -0.50DS and the corrected visual acuity was 20/20 OD. No retinoscopy reflex was seen OS during static retinoscopy and refraction was not possible in the dry state. The potential acuity was measured with interferometry. HF could see the 20/25 target OD and was unable to see the 20/400 target OS. Anterior segment examination was unremarkable in both eyes. IOP was measured at 4:00PM using iCare, which measured 16 mmHg OD and 16 mmHg OS. The patient was dilated with cyclopentolate 1% OU (2 drops, 5 minutes apart) and phenylephrine 2.5% OU. A cycloplegic retinoscopy OU revealed a refractive error of -0.50DS OD and -19.50 DS OS. The prescription was trial framed and the acuity in the left eye did not improve. Dilated fundus exam of the right eye revealed a healthy, round optic nerve head with a 0.25 H&V C/D ratio, a flat macula with a positive reflex, and normal vessels and periphery. Dilated examination of the left eye revealed a clear vitreous, a temporal optic disc pit, a nasal staphyloma, a flat macula with no foveal reflex, a tesselated fundus, normal vessels, lattice inferior and temporally, and white without pressure superiorly. Fundus photos were taken of both eyes at this visit. The optic nerve head in the left eye was noticeably larger than the optic nerve head of the right eye. III. Differential diagnosis The diagnosis included pathological myopia of the left eye, an optic disc pit of the left eye, sensory esotropia and hypertropia of the left eye, and severe amblyopia of the left eye. We could not determine if the optic pit was congenital or acquired as there are no previous records for HF. An OCT of both eyes was performed 1 week after the initial visit to investigate the possibility of any retinal detachments. Since HF’s fixation with her left eye was unstable, OCT testing was unattainable. IV. Diagnosis and discussion Optic pits are typically congenital or occur secondary to advanced glaucoma, but they can be acquired in cases of pathological myopia [1]. Georgalas et al reported that 85% to 90% of congenital optic disc pits are at the temporal optic disc, such as with patient HF, but the presence of pathological myopia could indicate that the pit was acquired in nature [2]. It is hypothesized that the mechanical stretching of the lamina cribosa in highly myopic eyes leads to the development of the optic pits [1]. Matsui et al evaluated the incidence between optic nerve pits in pathologically myopic patients in 2012 [1]. In the population of 198 highly myopic eyes examined, they reported that optic pits were as prevalent as 16.2% of cases [1]. 34.4% of them were optic disc pits, and 68.8% were conus pits [1]. When looking at their data, the researchers found that those with optic disc pits were more highly myopic and had significantly longer axial lengths than those who were highly myopic without any optic pits [1]. There are also many factors of HF’s optic disc that are typical of a congenital optic disc. Apart from the majority of congenital pits developing at the temporal margin of the disc, they also tend be round in shape [2]. In the cases of acquired pits, Matsui et al reported that they were triangular in shape [1]. Congenital optic pits also tend to be associated with optic nerve head megalodiscs, which can be seen in HF’s case [1]. An OCT of the optic pit would help with the differential diagnosis, as congenital pits tend to have a membrane that spans over the optic pit and those that are acquired do not [1]. V. Treatment, management The most appropriate treatment option for patient HF is optical correction of the left eye to try and improve the best-corrected visual acuity. Glasses were recommended for correction and for eye protection. The goal is to split the high prescription between the contact lenses and the glasses in order to increase comfort, cosmesis, and patient acceptance of the spectacle correction. We also recommended a retinal consult from Ophthalmology. VI. Conclusion When optic pits develop in the temporal area of the optic nerve they can severely reduce the visual acuity in that eye. It is possible that acquired optic nerve pits are associated with pathological myopia, and clinicians should be aware of this relationship. OCTs are important in order to determine if there are any associated retinal detachments present. 1. Ohno-Matsui, K., Akiba, M., Moriyama, M., Shimada, N., Ishibashi, T., Tokoro, T., & Spaide, R. F. (2012). Acquired optic nerve and peripapillary pits in pathologic myopia. Ophthalmology, 119(8), 1685-1692. 2. Georgalas, I., Ladas, I., Georgopoulos, G., & Petrou, P. (2011). Optic disc pit: a review. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 249(8), 1113- 1122. Imaging included in this case: Fundus photos OU .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vision Screening Training
    Vision Screening Training Child Health and Disability Prevention (CHDP) Program State of California CMS/CHDP Department of Health Care Services Revised 7/8/2013 Acknowledgements Vision Screening Training Workgroup – comprising Health Educators, Public Health Nurses, and CHDP Medical Consultants Dr. Selim Koseoglu, Pediatric Ophthalmologist Local CHDP Staff 2 Objectives By the end of the training, participants will be able to: Understand the basic anatomy of the eye and the pathway of vision Understand the importance of vision screening Recognize common vision disorders in children Identify the steps of vision screening Describe and implement the CHDP guidelines for referral and follow-up Properly document on the PM 160 vision screening results, referrals and follow-up 3 IMPORTANCE OF VISION SCREENING 4 Why Screen for Vision? Early diagnosis of: ◦ Refractive Errors (Nearsightedness, Farsightedness) ◦ Amblyopia (“lazy eye”) ◦ Strabismus (“crossed eyes”) Early intervention is the key to successful treatment 5 Why Screen for Vision? Vision problems often go undetected because: Young children may not realize they cannot see properly Many eye problems do not cause pain, therefore a child may not complain of discomfort Many eye problems may not be obvious, especially among young children The screening procedure may have been improperly performed 6 Screening vs. Diagnosis Screening Diagnosis 1. Identifies children at 1. Identifies the child’s risk for certain eye eye condition conditions or in need 2. Allows the eye of a professional
    [Show full text]
  • Updates on Myopia
    Updates on Myopia A Clinical Perspective Marcus Ang Tien Y. Wong Editors Updates on Myopia Marcus Ang • Tien Y. Wong Editors Updates on Myopia A Clinical Perspective Editors Marcus Ang Tien Y. Wong Singapore National Eye Center Singapore National Eye Center Duke-NUS Medical School Duke-NUS Medical School National University of Singapore National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore This book is an open access publication. ISBN 978-981-13-8490-5 ISBN 978-981-13-8491-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8491-2 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2020 Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction
    OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction OPTOMETRY: THE PRIMARY EYE CARE PROFESSION Doctors of optometry are independent primary health care providers who examine, diagnose, treat, and manage diseases and disorders of the visual system, the eye, and associated structures as well as diagnose related systemic conditions. Optometrists provide more than two-thirds of the primary eye care services in the United States. They are more widely distributed geographically than other eye care providers and are readily accessible for the delivery of eye and vision care services. There are approximately 36,000 full-time-equivalent doctors of optometry currently in practice in the United States. Optometrists practice in more than 6,500 communities across the United States, serving as the sole primary eye care providers in more than 3,500 communities. The mission of the profession of optometry is to fulfill the vision and eye care needs of the public through clinical care, research, and education, all of which enhance the quality of life. OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CARE OF THE PATIENT WITH ACCOMMODATIVE AND VERGENCE DYSFUNCTION Reference Guide for Clinicians Prepared by the American Optometric Association Consensus Panel on Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction: Jeffrey S. Cooper, M.S., O.D., Principal Author Carole R. Burns, O.D. Susan A. Cotter, O.D. Kent M. Daum, O.D., Ph.D. John R. Griffin, M.S., O.D. Mitchell M. Scheiman, O.D. Revised by: Jeffrey S. Cooper, M.S., O.D. December 2010 Reviewed by the AOA Clinical Guidelines Coordinating Committee: David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Strabismus: a Decision Making Approach
    Strabismus A Decision Making Approach Gunter K. von Noorden, M.D. Eugene M. Helveston, M.D. Strabismus: A Decision Making Approach Gunter K. von Noorden, M.D. Emeritus Professor of Ophthalmology and Pediatrics Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Texas Eugene M. Helveston, M.D. Emeritus Professor of Ophthalmology Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, Indiana Published originally in English under the title: Strabismus: A Decision Making Approach. By Gunter K. von Noorden and Eugene M. Helveston Published in 1994 by Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St. Louis, MO Copyright held by Gunter K. von Noorden and Eugene M. Helveston All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the authors. Copyright © 2010 Table of Contents Foreword Preface 1.01 Equipment for Examination of the Patient with Strabismus 1.02 History 1.03 Inspection of Patient 1.04 Sequence of Motility Examination 1.05 Does This Baby See? 1.06 Visual Acuity – Methods of Examination 1.07 Visual Acuity Testing in Infants 1.08 Primary versus Secondary Deviation 1.09 Evaluation of Monocular Movements – Ductions 1.10 Evaluation of Binocular Movements – Versions 1.11 Unilaterally Reduced Vision Associated with Orthotropia 1.12 Unilateral Decrease of Visual Acuity Associated with Heterotropia 1.13 Decentered Corneal Light Reflex 1.14 Strabismus – Generic Classification 1.15 Is Latent Strabismus
    [Show full text]
  • New-Onset-Right-Hypertropia.Pdf
    New-Onset Right Hypertropia: A Sequela of Inflammatory Orbital Pseudotumor I. Case Hx: A 45 year old African American male presents as a walk-in with a new vertical deviation of his right eye. He reports slow onset over the past six months, gradually worsening. He notes constant vertical diplopia. He denies eye pain. His comprehensive eye exam six months earlier was unremarkable. No vertical deviation was noted. A mild prescription was released for distance and near. Medical conditions include carpal tunnel, osteoarthritis, and poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes mellitus with a fluctuating HbA1c. He has a history of Bell’s Palsy affecting the right side of his face, but the condition has been resolved for fifteen years without recurrence. The patient is currently taking metformin and tramadol for joint pain. II. Pertinent findings: The patient was afebrile without nausea or fatigue. No recent illnesses were noted. Clinical examination indicated a vertical hypertropia OD greater than 40 prism diopters. Pupils were normal. EOMs indicated incomplete depression OD in downgaze and slight abduction limitations OD. CVFs were full to finger counting OD, OS. Hertel exophthalmometry was 30 OD, 25 OS. Color vision was normal. On slit lamp exam, 2-3+ periorbital edema OD was noted without tenderness. There was 2+ conjunctival chemosis with trace injection OD. No follicles or papillae were noted. The patient’s left eye was completely uninvolved. No anterior chamber reaction was noted OD,OS, and IOP was 23 mmHg OD, 18 mmHg OS. Upon dilated examination, all posterior health was unremarkable. No nerve edema or abnormalities were noted OD or OS.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternating Hyperphoria* by R
    Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.38.10.591 on 1 October 1954. Downloaded from Brit. J. Ophthal. (1954) 38, 591. ALTERNATING HYPERPHORIA* BY R. A. CRONE From the Ophthalmological Clinic, University of Amsterdam (Director: Prof. A. Hagedoorn) THE original aim of this investigation was the classification of cases of hyper- tropia and hyperphoria. Much more frequently than we had expected, we found alternating hyperphoria, and almost all the cases of hypertropia which were not clearly of a paretic nature proved to be complicated by this pheno- menon. When a large number of cases of hypertropia and hyperphoria had been examined, it became evident that a definite syndrome was present in the majority, alternating hyperphoria being the dominating feature. The material was provided by the patients of the Amsterdam Motility Clinic. Alternating hyperphoria proved to be so frequent that more than one hundred cases were noted in 18 months. Methods of Examination Most of the patients were examined several times. Special attention was paid copyright. to hereditary factors, to the time when squinting was first observed, and to nystagmus. The horizontal angle of squint and the degree of hypertropia were measured by the method ofreflex images and a tangent-screen. Quantitative data concerning the vertical angle of squint seldom came within the scope of this study. The following directions of gaze were examined: (1) Primary direction of gaze, also with head tilted to the right and to the left. (2) Looking to the right and to the left. http://bjo.bmj.com/ (3) Looking upwards and downwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Eye Movements and Vestibular Function in Critical Care, Emergency, and Ambulatory Neurology (Level 2)
    5th Congress of the European Academy of Neurology Oslo, Norway, June 29 - July 2, 2019 Teaching Course 15 Eye movements and vestibular function in critical care, emergency, and ambulatory neurology (Level 2) Eye Movements in muscles, nerves, neuromuscular junction, and functional neurological disorders Alessandra Rufa Siena, Italy Email: [email protected] 1 Eye movements and vestibular function in critical care, emergency, and ambulatory neurology Eye Movements in nerves, muscles, neuromuscular junction, and functional neurological disorders Alessandra Rufa, Siena, Italy Conflict of Interest In relation to this presentation and manuscript: ❑ the Author has no conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript. 2 Globe Rotates around the Three Axes FICK’S AXES • X AXIS: NASAL-TEMPORAL • Y AXIS: POSTERIOR-ANTERIOR • Z AXIS: SUPERIOR-INFERIOR • These axes intersect at the centre of rotation where also passes an immaginary coronal plane: the listing plane • Globe rotates right and left (adduction/abduction) on vertical axis Z • Globe rotates up and down (elevation /deprssion) on orizontal axis X • Globe makes torsional movements (intorsion/extorsion) on the antero- posterior axis Z Agonist Any particular EOM producing specific ocular movement (right LR abduction) Synergists Muscles of the same eye that move the eye in the same direction (Right SR and IO for elevation) Antagonists A pair of muscles in the same eye that move the eye in opposite direction (Right LR and MR) Yoke Muscles Pair of muscles one in each eye, that produce conjugate ocular movements (right LR and left MR in destroversion). 3 Sherrington law of the reciprocal innervation whenever an agonist receives an imput to contract, an equivalent inhibitory impulse is sent to the antagornist muscle Hering law of equal innervation or motor correspondence.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Common Eye Conditions in Children
    List of Common Eye Conditions in Children Amblyopia: Amblyopia, also known as lazy eye, is reduced vision in an eye that results from misalignment of the eyes (strabismus), a need for glasses (refractive error), or disruption of light passing through the eye (e.g. pediatric cataract). If recognized early (preschool years), amblyopia generally responds well to treatment. If recognized later (after 9-10 years of age), amblyopia is much more difficult to treat and the child may have permanent vision loss. Signs and symptoms to watch for include misaligned eyes, squinting one eye, bumping into objects or other signs of poor depth perception, head tilting, and double vision. Amblyopia therapy can include glasses, patching, eye drops, and sometimes surgery. Astigmatism: Astigmatism is a condition in which objects at both distance and near appear blurred. This results from uneven curvature of the cornea and/or lens which prevents light rays entering the eye from focusing to a single point on the retina, thereby causing blur. Astigmatism often occurs with myopia (nearsightedness) or hyperopia (farsightedness). Cataract: Any opacity or clouding of the normally clear lens of the eye. Cortical Visual Impairment: Cortical visual impairment (CVI) is vision loss due to any abnormality of the visual center in the brain. The eyes are normal, but the visual interpretation center in the brain does not function properly and prevents normal vision. Developmental Abnormalities: During development of the fetus, abnormalities in the visual system can occur. Some developmental abnormalities include coloboma, microphthalmia (small eye), and optic nerve hypoplasia. These abnormalities often result in vision loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Symptoms and Findings in MS: Clues and Management
    6/5/2014 Common visual symptoms and findings in MS: Clues and Identification Teresa C Frohman, PA-C, MSCS Neuro-ophthalmology Research Manager, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas Professor Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas Dallas COMMON COMPLAINTS 1 6/5/2014 Blurry Vision Corrected with Refraction? YES NO Refractive Keep Looking Error IN MS : ON, Diplopia, Nystagmus Most Common Visual Issues Encountered in MS patients • Optic Neuritis • Diplopia • Nystagmus result from damage to the optic nerve or from an incoordination in the eye muscles or damage to a part of the oculomotor pathway or apparatus 2 6/5/2014 Optic Neuritis Workup ‘frosted glass’ Part of visual field missing Pain +/- Color desaturation Work up for Yes diplopia or nystagmus Seeing double images YES NO Or ‘jiggling’ No Neuro-ophth exam Humphrey’s OCT MRI Fundoscopy CRANIAL NERVE ANATOMY There are 12 pairs of cranial nerves CN I Smell CN II Vision CN III, IV, VI Oculomotor CN V Trigeminal Sensorimotor muscles of the Jaw CN VII Sensorimotor of the face CN VIII Hearing//vestibular CN IX, X, XII Mouth, esophagus, oropharynx CN XI Cervical Spine and shoulder 6 3 6/5/2014 NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY EXAM Visual Acuity Color Vision Afferent pupillary reaction- objective test of CNII function Alternating flashlight test – afferent arc of pupillary light reflex pathway Fundus exam Visual Fields –confrontation at bedside CRANIAL NERVE II: OPTIC once the retinal ganglion cell axons leave the back of the eye they become myelinated behind the lamina cribosa ---and
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON EYE COMPLAINTS July 15, 2004 Vatinee Bunya
    4/24/2018 They have a lazy eye… Be Specific!! Esotropia vs. Pseudoesotropia Eyes crossing (esotropia) Eyes drifting (exotropia) Head turn Droopy eyelid Vision concerns 1 4/24/2018 www.aapos.org/terms/conditions/49 Vertical strabismus Ocular torticollis Nystagmus Finding their null point Strabismus Fusion or less strain Ptosis Chin up to see below lids Refractive Error Squinting equivalent Amblyopia Amblyopia Three main reasons for amblyopia Refractive Greater than 2 lines difference in visual ○ high myopia/hyperopia or acuity or obvious preference for fixation in anisometropia non-verbal Strabismic Induced tropia test ○ Esotropia or exotropia or hypertropia ○ Take 12 pd base down over both eyes Deprevational ○ Symmetric response= no preference ○ Cataract, corneal opacity, vitreous ○ Asymmetric response= amblyopia hemorrhage, ptosis, hemangioma 2 4/24/2018 Their eyelid is swollen… Amblyopia Treatment Force brain to use weaker eye Fix underlying etiology (give glasses, fix strab remove cataract,etc) Patch Atropine Occluding CL Fog glasses No-No arm braces Super glue Management Stye/Chalazion Stye vs. Chalazion Warm compresses Lid hygiene Erythromycin vs. Maxitrol/Tobradex Surgical excision Cellulitis Can they open their eyelids on their own? Preseptal vs. Can you get the eyelids open? Postseptal Cellulitiss 3 4/24/2018 Treatment Orbital cellulitis Results from Antiobiotics Local resistance patterns Spread of contiguous sinus disease (most common) ○ 75-85% of cases are chronic sinusitis (acute 0.5-3%) Check blood cultures first ○ Most commonly ethmoid aircells To drain or not to drain? Traumatic violation of the orbit (implantation of Worrisome optic neuropathy foreign bodies) signs Trans-septal spread of preseptal cellulitis Abscess within orbit Metastatic hematogenous spread to orbit ○ not subperiosteal ○ Valveless orbital veins Treatment failures Dental abscess to orbit Orbital cellulitis My child’s eye is red… Common organisms Staphylcoccus Aureus Streptococcus species Anaerobic If <4 years old consider H.
    [Show full text]
  • A- and V-Patterns and Oblique Muscle Overaction A- and V-Patterns
    18 A- and V-Patterns and Oblique Muscle Overaction A- and V-Patterns Clinical Features Etiology Management with Horizontal Rectus Muscle Offsets Inferior Oblique Overaction Etiology Clinical Features Differential Diagnosis Management Superior Oblique Overaction Etiology Clinical Features Differential Diagnosis Management Superior Oblique Weakening Procedures Complications A- and V-patterns of strabismus are changes in the horizontal deviation as the patient looks up and down. They are usually associated with oblique dysfunction, either overaction or paresis. Primary oblique muscle overaction is when an oblique muscle is too strong for its antagonist and there is no known cause. Secondary oblique overaction is caused by a paresis of the antagonist muscle. A superior oblique paresis results in inferior oblique overaction, and inferior oblique paresis results in superior oblique overaction. This chapter covers the management of A- and V- patterns and primary oblique muscle overaction. A- and V-Patterns CLINICAL FEATURES A-patterns are defined as increasing divergence in down gaze (>10 prism diopters [PD]), whereas Vpatterns are increased divergence (>15 prism diopters) in up gaze. The type of A- or V-pattern helps identify the cause. Superior oblique paresis produces a V-pattern, arrow subtype, with convergence in down gaze. The arrow pattern subtype indicates a lack of abduction in down gaze, the field of action of the superior oblique muscles. Inferior oblique overaction, on the other hand, has a V-pattern, Y subtype, with increased abduction in up gaze. The Y-pattern occurs because the field of action of the inferior oblique muscles is up gaze and they are abductors. Lambda subtype is typically associated with superior oblique overaction, with increased abduction in down gaze, because the field of action is in down gaze.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Fourth Nerve Palsies Mitchell S.V
    RESIDENT &FELLOW SECTION Pearls and Oy-sters: Section Editor Central fourth nerve palsies Mitchell S.V. Elkind, MD, MS Daniel R. Gold, DO CLINICAL PEARLS Lesions of the fourth (trochlear) Clinical features suggestive of bilateral fourth nerve Robert K. Shin, MD cranial nerve cause vertical or oblique diplopia by impair- palsies include right hypertropia in left gaze, left hyper- Steven Galetta, MD ing the ability of the superior oblique muscle to intort tropia in right gaze, and alternating hypertropia with and depress the eye. This binocular diplopia worsens in head tilt to either side (i.e., right hypertropia with right downgaze and lateral gaze away from the affected eye. tilt and left hypertropia with left head tilt).8 Correspondence & reprint Because intorsion is necessary to maintain fusion in ocu- requests to Dr. Gold: [email protected] lar counter-roll, this diplopia also worsens with head tilt CASE REPORTS Case 1. A20-year-oldmanpresented 1,2 toward the affected eye. to the emergency department complaining of 6 days of Diagnosis of a superior oblique palsy can be made binocular vertical diplopia and a left eyelid droop. He using the Parks-Bielschowsky 3-step test: 1) determine had noted fatigue, bilateral eye pain, and flu-like symp- which eye is hypertropic, 2) determine if the hypertro- toms 2 to 4 weeks prior to presentation. pia worsens in left or right gaze, and 3) determine if the Left-sided ptosis and miosis were present on exam- hypertropia worsens in right or left head tilt. In a supe- ination, along with a left adduction deficit.
    [Show full text]