TURKEY MINISTRY of INTERIOR TURKISH NATIONAL POLICE Anti-Smuggling and Organized Crime Department

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TURKEY MINISTRY of INTERIOR TURKISH NATIONAL POLICE Anti-Smuggling and Organized Crime Department REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF INTERIOR TURKISH NATIONAL POLICE Anti-Smuggling and Organized Crime Department 2013 NATIONAL REPORT (2012 data) TO THE EMCDDA by the Reitox National Focal Point TURKEY New Development, Trends and in-depth information on selected issues TURKISH MONITORING CENTRE FOR DRUGS AND DRUG ADDICTION (TUBİM) REITOX 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................... 2 TURKISH NATIONAL FOCAL POINT STAFF PREPARING THE REPORT ........................... 7 DATA PROVIDING AGENCIES AND AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES ................................... 9 ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................. 12 SECTION A ............................................................................................................................ 15 NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND TRENDS ................................................................................ 15 SECTION 1 ............................................................................................................................ 15 DRUG POLICY: LAWS, STRATEGIES AND ECONOMIC ANALYSES ................................ 15 1.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 15 1.2. Legal Framework ......................................................................................................... 24 1.2.1. New regulations in the Field of Fighting against Drugs (Laws, Directives, Notices, and Other Practices) ....................................................................................................... 24 1.2.1.1. Laws ............................................................................................................... 24 1.2.1.2. Directives ........................................................................................................ 25 1.2.1.3. Circulars .......................................................................................................... 26 1.2.1.4. Other Practices ............................................................................................... 27 1.2.1.5. Recommendations .......................................................................................... 28 1.3. Assessment of National Drug Policy and Strategy Document and Action Plans, and Coordination ....................................................................................................................... 29 1.3.1. National Drug Policy and Strategy Document and Action Plan .............................. 29 1.3.1.1. National Drug Policy and Strategy Document (2013-2018) ............................. 30 1.3.1.2. National Drug Action Plan Document (2013-2015) .......................................... 32 1.3.1.3. Provincial Drug Action Plans at Local Level .................................................... 33 1.3.2. Implementation and Assessment of National Drug Policy and Strategy Document and Action Plan ............................................................................................................... 33 1.3.3. Developments on Other Drug Policies ................................................................... 35 1.3.4. Coordination Related Adjustments ........................................................................ 39 1.3.4.1. National Coordination ...................................................................................... 39 1.3.4.2. Local Coordination .......................................................................................... 42 1.4. Economic Analyses ...................................................................................................... 44 1.4.1. Public Expenses .................................................................................................... 44 1.4.2. Budget ................................................................................................................... 46 2 1.4.3. Social Costs .......................................................................................................... 47 SECTION 2 ............................................................................................................................ 48 PREVALENCE OF DRUG USE: RISK FACTORS AND PERCEPTIONS .............................. 48 2.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 48 2.2. Drug Use In The General Population ........................................................................... 48 2.2.2. Drug Use According to Tobacco, Alcohol and Pharmaceutical Drug Use without Physician Recommendation ............................................................................................ 51 2.2.3. Cannabis Use ........................................................................................................ 52 2.2.4. Perception of Substance Use ................................................................................ 54 2.2.5. Results .................................................................................................................. 56 2.3. Use Of Substance In Schools And Among Young Population ...................................... 57 2.4. Use Of Drugs Among Special Groups / National And Local Regulations ...................... 57 SECTION 3 ............................................................................................................................ 58 PREVENTION ........................................................................................................................ 58 3.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 58 3.2. Environmental Prevention ............................................................................................ 59 3.2.1. Regulations on Tobacco and Alcohol Control Policies ........................................... 60 3.2.1.1. Regulations on Tobacco Control Policies ........................................................ 60 3.2.1.2. Regulations on Alcohol Control Policies .......................................................... 63 3.3. Universal Prevention .................................................................................................... 65 3.3.1. School-Based Prevention ...................................................................................... 65 3.3.2. Family-Based Prevention ....................................................................................... 67 3.3.3. Community-Based Prevention ............................................................................... 68 3.4. Group Based Prevention in Groups and Environments under Risk .............................. 69 3.4.1. Risk Groups ........................................................................................................... 69 3.4.2. Families at Risk ..................................................................................................... 69 3.4.3. Recreational Settings ............................................................................................ 70 3.5. Individual-Based Prevention......................................................................................... 70 3.6. Campaigns in National and Local Media ...................................................................... 70 3.7. Prevention Activities throughout Turkey Carried Out by TUBİM Provincial Contact Points ................................................................................................................................. 71 SECTION 4 ............................................................................................................................ 74 PROBLEM DRUG ABUSE..................................................................................................... 74 4.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 74 4.2. Estimations on Prevalence of Problem Drug Use and Incidence .................................. 75 4.3. Problem Drug Users data Received from Sources Other Than Treatment ................... 77 3 SECTION 5 ............................................................................................................................ 78 DRUG ADDICTION TREATMENT ......................................................................................... 78 5.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 78 5.2. Overview, Eligibility And Quality Assurance ................................................................. 79 5.2.1. Strategy and Policy ................................................................................................ 79 5.2.2. Treatment Systems ............................................................................................... 80 5.3. Access to Treatment ................................................................................................... 82 5.3.1. Characteristics of Patients under Treatment .......................................................... 84 5.3.1. Tendencies of Patients under Treatment ............................................................... 86 SECTION 6 ...........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • SIRA NO Yatırımcı Adı İl İlçe Köy Hibe Tutar Hibe Esas Tutar Ayni Katkı
    Hibe Esas Yatırımcı Adı İl İlçe Köy Hibe Tutar Ayni Katkı Toplam Tutar SIRA NO Tutar 1 YÜCEL AKKURT ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 12961,9 25923,8 28038,2 53962 2 VEDAT SAMİ AKYILDIZ ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 4910,725 9821,45 3301,05 13122,5 3 YUSUF AKYILDIZ ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 26473,175 52946,35 12932,65 65879 4 HALİL İBRAHİM AYDÖRE ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 52453,75 104907,5 30656,5 135564 5 SERDAR AYDÖRE ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 37781,05 75562,1 30622,47 106184,57 6 MUHİTTİN AYDÖRE ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 15443,3 30886,6 12069,01 42955,61 7 ŞÜKRAN BOLAT ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 8272,95 16545,9 6120,27 22666,17 8 YILMAZ ÜRKER ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 7993,835 15987,67 3229,68 19217,35 9 MESUT ERSEN ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 24693,9 49387,8 7551,35 56939,15 10 FEHMİ BOLAT ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 18206,295 36412,59 7949,28 44361,87 11 NAZIM VAR ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 18891,4 37782,8 12904,2 50687 12 ÖMER ULUDAĞ ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 8307,645 16615,29 5278,25 21893,54 13 AHMET GENCEL ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 17527,8 35055,6 11970,4 47026 14 İSMAİL ÖZÜTOK ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 13893,61 27787,22 8308,07 36095,29 15 HALİM SONUÇAR ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BAHÇECİK 6667,41 13334,82 3031,18 16366 16 SALİM GÖKDEMİR ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BAHÇECİK 18176,25 36352,5 5710 42062,5 17 ÜMİT KARACA ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BAHÇECİK 15134,56 30269,12 5368,38 35637,5 18 İBRAHİM TOPÇU ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BAHÇECİK 19736,745 39473,49 7992,09 47465,58 19 TURAN ÇOLAK ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BOZAN 6706,1 13412,2 2020,8 15433 20 NURETTİN ÖZKARA ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BOZAN 6994,67 13989,34 2175,66 16165 21 BEYTULLAH EVCİN ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BOZAN
    [Show full text]
  • Manisa Ili Mahalle Muhtarlari Iletişim Bilgileri
    MANİSA İLİ MAHALLE MUHTARLARI İLETİŞİM BİLGİLERİ GENEL SIRA ADI SOYADI İL İLÇE MAHALLE TELEFON SIRA NO NO 1 1 Mehmet Ali YILDIRIM MANİSA AHMETLİ ALAHIDIR 0 (537) 495 07 91 2 2 Mustafa KARADAĞ MANİSA AHMETLİ ALTIEYLÜL 0 (538) 433 98 19 3 3 Yusuf KARAMAN MANİSA AHMETLİ ATAKÖY 0 (532) 664 75 58 4 4 Dursun SAKA MANİSA AHMETLİ BAHÇECİK 0 (539) 403 40 16 5 5 Erol ASLAN MANİSA AHMETLİ BARBAROS 0 (536) 485 04 31 6 6 Refik BİLGİÇ MANİSA AHMETLİ CAMBAZLI 0 (505) 450 50 48 7 7 Ramazan KOZAN MANİSA AHMETLİ DEREKÖY 0 (537) 627 41 30 8 8 Mustafa Ali ASLAN MANİSA AHMETLİ DERİCİ 0 (536) 928 90 89 9 9 Kemal ESER MANİSA AHMETLİ DİBEKDERE 0 (532) 732 81 50 10 10 Kadir TÜRKER MANİSA AHMETLİ GÖKKAYA 0 (507) 132 28 34 11 11 Recep MERCAN MANİSA AHMETLİ GÜLDEDE 0 (545) 360 90 90 12 12 Bayram KOLAY MANİSA AHMETLİ HACIKÖSELİ 0 (546) 434 23 11 13 13 Hasan Basri SEVER MANİSA AHMETLİ HALİLKAHYA 0 (537) 217 93 87 14 14 Abdullah ADIGÜZEL MANİSA AHMETLİ KARAKÖY 0 (535) 932 11 00 15 15 Sedat AYDIN MANİSA AHMETLİ KARGIN 0 (536) 666 94 73 16 16 Muzaffer ÜNLÜKOÇ MANİSA AHMETLİ KENDİRLİK 0 (533) 217 35 64 17 17 Aydın Güven GÜRBÜZ MANİSA AHMETLİ KESTELLİ 0 (546) 816 94 91 18 18 Hamza TAVUZ MANİSA AHMETLİ KURTULUŞ 0 (542) 795 88 11 19 19 Adem ERBAY MANİSA AHMETLİ MANDALLI 0 (535) 357 81 16 20 20 Nasuh Sururi YILMAZ MANİSA AHMETLİ SEYDİKÖY 0 (538) 203 38 65 21 21 Hüseyin ERTEKİN MANİSA AHMETLİ ULUCAMİ 0 (532) 646 88 01 22 22 Ziya KARAMUK MANİSA AHMETLİ YARAŞLI 0 (542) 307 28 37 23 23 Uğur DOĞAN MANİSA AHMETLİ ZAFER 0 (535) 626 47 23 0 (546) 464 14 64 24 1 Veli KOCAMAN MANİSA
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses IX Archaeology and history of Lydia from the early Lydian period to late antiquity (8th century B.C.-6th century A.D.). An international symposium May 17-18, 2017 / Izmir, Turkey ABSTRACTS Edited by Ergün Laflı Gülseren Kan Şahin Last Update: 21/04/2017. Izmir, May 2017 Websites: https://independent.academia.edu/TheLydiaSymposium https://www.researchgate.net/profile/The_Lydia_Symposium 1 This symposium has been dedicated to Roberto Gusmani (1935-2009) and Peter Herrmann (1927-2002) due to their pioneering works on the archaeology and history of ancient Lydia. Fig. 1: Map of Lydia and neighbouring areas in western Asia Minor (S. Patacı, 2017). 2 Table of contents Ergün Laflı, An introduction to Lydian studies: Editorial remarks to the abstract booklet of the Lydia Symposium....................................................................................................................................................8-9. Nihal Akıllı, Protohistorical excavations at Hastane Höyük in Akhisar………………………………10. Sedat Akkurnaz, New examples of Archaic architectural terracottas from Lydia………………………..11. Gülseren Alkış Yazıcı, Some remarks on the ancient religions of Lydia……………………………….12. Elif Alten, Revolt of Achaeus against Antiochus III the Great and the siege of Sardis, based on classical textual, epigraphic and numismatic evidence………………………………………………………………....13. Gaetano Arena, Heleis: A chief doctor in Roman Lydia…….……………………………………....14. Ilias N. Arnaoutoglou, Κοινὸν, συμβίωσις: Associations in Hellenistic and Roman Lydia……….……..15. Eirini Artemi, The role of Ephesus in the late antiquity from the period of Diocletian to A.D. 449, the “Robber Synod”.……………………………………………………………………….………...16. Natalia S. Astashova, Anatolian pottery from Panticapaeum…………………………………….17-18. Ayşegül Aykurt, Minoan presence in western Anatolia……………………………………………...19.
    [Show full text]
  • Ege Coğrafya Dergisi Aegean Geographical Journal
    Ege Coğrafya Dergisi Aegean Geographical Journal https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ecd e-ISSN: 2636-8056 Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 30(1), 2021, s. 57-72, DOI: 10.51800/ecd.837251 Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article SİVRİHİSAR (ESKİŞEHİR) GELENEKSEL KENT DOKUSUNUN KORUMA BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ Evaluation of Sivrihisar (Eskişehir) Traditional Urban Texture in the Context of Conservation Canan KOÇ1 Ahmet KOÇ Dicle Üniversitesi Dicle Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Şehircilik Anabilim Dalı Teknik Bilimler M.Y.O [email protected] [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0003-0992-2290 ORCID: 0000-0001-6932-6680 (Teslim: 7 Aralık 2020; Son Düzeltme: 6 Mart 2021; Kabul: 19 Mart 2021) (Received: December 7, 2020; Last Revised: March 6, 2021; Accepted: March 19, 2021) Abstract The national and international studies for the conservation of the city are carried out in Turkey has many cities with rich historical and cultural values. Especially after 1950 with the increase in the destruction of historical city textures as a result of the rapid population growth and unplanned urbanization, the conservation of immovable antiquities has come to the fore and various legal regulations have been made. Conservation efforts continue today, and rehabilitation practices are continued in historical regions. It is of great importance to carry out conservation activities within the framework of sustainability in the historical cities, which contain the traces of various civilizations. Sivrihisar city, which has a deep-rooted history and preserved its traditional texture, was chosen as the study area. The method of the study consists of 5 stages as determination of the problem, literature review, on-site observation and examination, evaluation, results and recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration
    BULLETIN OF THE MINERAL RESEARCH AND EXPLORATION Foreign Edition 2013 146 CONTENTS From Editor... A New Age Finding In The Central Sakarya Region (NW Turkey) ...................................................................................................................................................M. Fuat UĞUZ 1 Description Of Two New Families, Three New Species and Re-Description Of Four known Genera And One Subfamily From The Larger Benthic Foraminifera Of Paleocene In Turkey ................................................................................................................................................ Ercüment SİREL 27 The Ostracod Fauna And Environmental Characteristics Of The Volcanosedimentary Yolüstü Formation In The Hınıs Region, Erzurum (Eastern Anatolia), Turkey ..................................................................................................................................................... Ümit ŞAFAK 55 Petrogenetic Characteristics Of Oyaca – Kedikayası – Boyalık Adakites In SW Ankara (Central Anatolia, Turkey): Evidences For Slab Melt Metasomatism .................................................................................................................................. Pınar ŞEN and Erdal ŞEN 81 Hydrogeochemical And Isotopic Investigation Of Nasrettin Hoca Springs, Eskisehir, Turkey ....................... Mehmet ÇELİK, U. Erdem DOKUZ, P. Elif TÜRKÖZ, Özlem GÜLLÜ and Şebnem ARSLAN 93 Neogene Stratigraphy Of The Eskişehir Graben And The Investigation Of Coal Deposition By Seismic
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Inorganic Elements in Poppy Straw by Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive Spectrometry As a Means of Ascertaining Origin
    Determination of inorganic elements in poppy straw by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry as a means of ascertaining origin E. ÇOPUR Department of Chemistry, Gendarmarie General Command Criminal Laboratory, Ankara, Turkey 4 N. G. GÖGER, and T. ORBEY Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey B. SENER¸ Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey ABSTRACT Cultivation of poppy as a source of opium alkaloids for legitimate medical purposes has a long tradition in Turkey. The main products are poppy straw and concentrate of poppy straw, obtained from dried poppy capsules. The aims of the study reported in the present article were to establish inorganic element profiles for the poppy-growing provinces of Turkey by means of X-ray analysis by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM/EDS) and to explore the potential of the technique for determination of origin. Ten elements (sodium, magnesium, silicon, phosphorus, sulphur, chlorine, potassium, calcium, copper and zinc) were analysed in poppy straw samples from 67 towns in nine provinces. As regards the determination of origin, the most significant finding was the presence of copper and zinc in the poppy straw samples from 8 of the 15 towns in Afyon Province. Since those elements are not normally found in soil, it is assumed that their presence is the result of environmental (industrial) contamination. Differences in the samples from the other eight provinces were less signifi- cant, possibly a result of their geographical proximity. Nevertheless, differences in the samples were apparent. Because the findings are relative rather than absolute in terms of presence or absence of individual inorganic elements, further research is required to convert them into operationally usable results.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukome Kararı
    1..C. MANisA BÜYüKŞEHİR BELEDİYESİ tl UKOME KARARI : karar Tarihi : l3. ı0.20l5 Karar Sayısı : 20l5i96 saat : 14.00 Yer : Ulaşlm Daiİesi B8şkınlığl Ukome sslonu Kon u : Yolcu Taşımı Gilzergahları. UKOME GENEL KURULU; Genel Seloeter Yardımcıst F-uat UZUN.başkanhğında; t. Piyade Eğitim Tugay Komutanlığı temsilcisi, il llmni}et Müdür]üğü temsilcisi, İI Jandama Komutanltğü temsi|cisi, YatınmIan İz|eme ve Koordinasyon BğkanIıgı-temsilcisi, Karayollan Boİge Müdürlijğü temsilcisi,'IC, I)ev|et Demiryollan t€msilcisi, Manisa Büyükşehiİ Belediyesini ıemsilen U|aştm Daire- Balkarı V.-imar ve Şehircilik İ)airesi BaŞkaı ttüt \e l'rojeleİ Dairesi V Başkarılüğ temsi|cisi, Fen lşleri Dairesi Başkanltğı temsilcisi, i'raf* Hizmetieri Şube Müdür V. Ulaşım I'lanlama ve'loplu taŞıma Şube Müdür V. Terminaller Şube Müdür V. Şehzadeler, Yıınusemre, Akhisaı, Kul4 Salihli, Sanröl, Saruhanh, sele;di, somir. I urgutlu Belediyc l}aŞkıurlığt temsi|cileri, Şofü.ler ve olomobilciler odası temsilcisinin kat!hmı ile gündeminde bııIunan konulart görüşmek iilerc 1J.l0.20l5 sah günü saat:l4.00' de toplarıdı. İLGiLi MEVzLA1' HÜKÜMLERİ: l-)52l6 Sayılı Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kanunu, 5393 SayıIı Belediye Kanuııu ve 6360 Sayılt on larn ildc Büyül§ehir tselediyesi ve Yirni Yedi İlçe KurulmaJı ile Bazı kanun ve Kanun Hii.lİnttnde Kaıarnameıerde Degişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanı]n. 2-.}.29l8 SayıJı Karayollan Tralık Kanımu ve Kaİayollan Trafik Yön€tİneliği, 3-)lÇiŞleri B?ıkanlüğınca Çlkartılan Büyükşehir Belediyeleri Koordinasyon Merkezleıi Yönetmeliği ile Manisa Büyül§ehir BeIediye§i l Jlaşım Koordinasyon Merkezi YönetmeIiği. TEKLİi: Ulaşım l)ai.esj Başkantığı Ulaşım Planlama ve Toplu Taşuna Şube MüdiiIlüğünün 09.10.2015 tarih ve 5123 sayıh ek gündem maddesi. UKOME Gene] Kurulu üyelerinc€ gündeme ahııınasü uyguı görtllmüş olup söz konı§u yazıda; Manisa Büyiikşehir Belediyesi İınırlan ıÇcrisindc ilÇeler tırası ve ilçeIerden i| merkezine ulaşüİrl hizmetlerinin sunulması için, Manisa Büyükşehir Belediye Başkanliğınca toplu taşlma aracı \JIı)ıınlması planIarımış ,Jlup.
    [Show full text]
  • INVESTMENT CLIMATE of ESKİŞEHİR
    2017 INVESTMENT CLIMATE of ESKİŞEHİR INVESTMENT CLIMATE of ESKİŞEHİR 1 April 2017 INDEX 1. ABOUT BEBKA 4 2. FACTS AND FIGURES 5 3. LOCATION AND TRANSPORTATION 10 4. SOCIAL LIFE 11 5. ECONOMY 13 6. LABOR 15 7. FOREIGN TRADE 15 8. SECTORS 19 9. CLUSTERING 23 10. SPECIAL INVESTMENT ZONES 24 11. UNIVERSITIES 25 12. R&D AND INNOVATION 28 13. FOREIGN INVESTMENTS 28 14. INVESTMENT INCENTIVE SYSTEM 29 15. COSTS 32 16. WHY ESKİŞEHİR? 32 BIBLIOGRAPHY 33 INVESTMENT CLIMATE of ESKİŞEHİR 2017 2017 INVESTMENT CLIMATE of ESKİŞEHİR 1. ABOUT BEBKA Bursa Eskişehir Bilecik Development Agency (BEBKA) was established with the decision of the Council of Ministers dated July 14, 2009 and numbered 2009/15236 on the basis of Law No. 5449 on the Establishment, Coordination and Duties of Development Agencies dated 25.01.2006. BEBKA is an institution that provides solutions for local problems by providing coordination and cooperation between the public, private sector and non-governmental organizations, providing solutions locally and providing sustainable development by using resources in place and effectively in Bursa, Eskişehir and Bilecik provinces. BEBKA’s main goal is to reduce intra-regional development disparities by providing coordination and cooperation between the public sector, private sector, civil society and universities. In line with this objective, 2014-2023 Bursa Eskişehir Bilecik Regional Plan, which defines BEBKA’s regional priorities with scientific methods and participa- tory approach, has been prepared. Within the framework of this regional plan, a model has been developed to guide development of project finan- cing support, training needs, investment and promotion possibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Eskişehir, Kütahya, Afyonkarahisar İlleri 2004 Yılı Arkeolojik Envanteri Ve Yüzey Araştırması
    HM UHk Enwwt' Derç/S' 4/2005 Eskişehir, Kütahya, Afyonkarahisar İlleri 2004 Yılı Arkeolojik Envanteri ve Yüzey Araştırması Taciser TÜFEKÇİ SİVAS*/ Hakan SİVAS*" ANAHTAR SÖZCÜKLER / KEYWORDS Frig yerleşmeleri. Frig koya mezarı, tümüiüs. nekropol, adak ve mezar steHefi, kale, höyük Phrygian settlements, Phrygian rock cut tomb, tumulus, necropolis, votive and sepulchral steles, fortress, mound ÖZET/SUMMARY Klasik Devirde "Phrygia Fpiktetos" olarak According to data revealed by archaeological isimlendirilen araştırma sahası, arkeolojik kazı excavation and field survey, the survey area ve yüzey araştırmalarından elde edilen sonuç­ which was called Phrygia Epictetos in the lara göre tarih öncesi çağlardan itibaren iskân Classical Period, has been inhabited since edilmeye başlamıştır. prehistoric periods. Bölgede 2002 yılından bu yana TÜBA- In 2004, the survey activity was focused ma­ TÜKSFK Türkiye Kültür Envanteri kapsamında inly on the districts of Alpu, Sivrihisar, Beyli- sürdürdüğümüz arkeolojik kültür varlıkları en kova, Mihalıççık, Mahmudiye, Seyitgazi and varıter çalışmalarına 2004 yılında da devam Han in the province of Eskişehir and in the edilmiş; arazı çalışmalarında Eskişehir'in mer­ central district of the province of Kütahya. As kez, Alpu, Sivrihisar, Beylskova, Mihalıççık, a result, 62 villages in the province of Eskişe­ Mahmudiye, Seyitgazi ve Han ilçelerinde 62, hir and 4 villages in the province of Kütahya Kütahya'nın merkez ilçesinde ise 4 köy ince­ were surveyed. During the field work, not lenmiştir. Bu çalışmalar sırasında Bizans ve only many fortresses, open settlements, nec­ Roma devirlerine ait malzeme veren kale, düz ropolises with rock cut tombs, tumuli, marble yerleşme, kaya mezarlarından oluşan nekro- votive and sepulchral steles bearing inscripti­ pol alanları ve tümü/üsler, çok sayıda yazıtfı ve ons and reliefs dating to Byzantine and Ro­ kabartma bezemeli mermer mezar ve adak man periods, but also Phrygian rock cut mo­ steti.
    [Show full text]
  • Yüksel Proje
    YÜKSEL PROJE Yüksel Proje Uluslararası A.Ş. Birlik Mahallesi 9. Cadde No: 41 Çankaya 06610 ANKARA Tel: +90 (312) 495 70 00 Faks: +90 (312) 495 70 24 ANKARA-ISTANBUL HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY) DOKAY Engineering and Consultancy Ltd. Öveçler 4. Cadde No: 140/A 06460 Dikmen ANKARA Tel: +90 (312) 475 7131 • Faks: +90 (312) 475 7130 www.dokay.info.tr ANKARA OCTOBER 2006 i / i CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3 3 GOVERNING LEGISLATION 5 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDIES 6 5 ALTERNATIVES 8 5.1 Corridor Alternatives 8 5.2 Route Alternatives 9 6 CONSULTATION 9 7 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 12 8 CONCLUSION 12 APPENDIX – National and International Environmental Legislation 14 AIHST EIA Report – Non-Technical Summary October 2006 Project No: 25-01 1 / 15 1 INTRODUCTION Ankara-Istanbul High-Speed Train (AIHST) Project is carried out by Turkish Republic State Railways (TRSR) in order to provide a time-efficient, comfortable and safe transportation opportunity (see Figures 1-3). The major objectives of the Project are summarized below: • To decrease the travelling time between Ankara and Istanbul; • To provide a comfortable and safe transportation opportunity; and • To increase the share of railway in the national transportation network. Figure 1. A view of the train to be used in the Figure 2. General compartment interior view of the Project. train to be used in the Project. Figure 3. General view of the train to be used in the Project. Ankara-Istanbul transportation corridor is the busiest transportation route of Turkey in terms of highway, railway and airline traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Mahmudiye-Alpu (Eskişehir) Arasının Jeotermal Enerji Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi
    Mahmudiye-Alpu (Eskişehir) Arasının Jeotermal Enerji Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi Lütfi Taşkıran DOKTORA TEZİ Jeoloji Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı Mayıs-2014 Determination of Geothermal Energy Potential Mahmudiye and Alpu Region (Eskisehir) Lutfi Taskiran DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Department of Geological Engineering May-2014 Mahmudiye-Alpu (Eskişehir) Arasının Jeotermal Enerji Potansiyeli’nin Belirlenmesi Lütfi Taşkıran Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Lisansüstü Yönetmeliği Uyarınca Jeoloji Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı Uygulamalı Jeoloji Bilim Dalında DOKTORA TEZİ Olarak Hazırlanmıştır Danışman: Prof. Dr. Galip Yüce Mayıs-2014 ONAY Jeoloji Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı Doktora öğrencisi Lütfi Taşkıran’ın DOKTORA tezi olarak hazırladığı “Mahmudiye-Alpu (Eskişehir) Arasının Jeotermal Enerji Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi” başlıklı bu çalışma, jürimizce lisansüstü yönetmeliğin ilgili maddeleri uyarınca değerlendirilerek kabul edilmiştir. Danışman : Prof. Dr. Galip Yüce İkinci Danışman : - Doktora Tez Savunma Jürisi: Üye : Prof. Dr. Galip YÜCE Üye : Prof. Dr. Halim MUTLU Üye : Doç.Dr. H. Tolga YALÇIN Üye : Prof. Dr. Nilgün GÜLEÇ Üye : Prof. Dr. Serdar BAYARI Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yönetim Kurulu’nun ............................. tarih ve ........................ sayılı kararıyla onaylanmıştır. Prof. Dr. Nimetullah BURNAK Enstitü Müdürü v ÖZET Bu tez çalışması kapsamında, Mahmudiye-Alpu (Eskişehir) ilçeleri arasındaki belirlenen çalışma alanının jeolojik, hidrojeolojik ve hidrojeokimyasal inceleme ve araştırması yapılarak, elde
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of West Nile Virus Infection in Turkey Based on Two Recent Cases
    ASSESSMENT OF WEST NILE VIRUS INFECTION IN TURKEY BASED ON TWO RECENT CASES Tugba Sari1, Dilek Menemenlioglu2, Ebru Aydin3, Tuba Nur Ozden4, Metin Kizilelma5, Hasan Irmak6 and Irfan Sencan6 1Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli; 2Turkish Public Health Institution, Department of Microbiology Reference Laboratories; 3Turkish Public Health Institution, Department of Zoonotic and Vectorial Diseases, Ankara; 4Manisa Public Health Office, Department of Communicable Diseases, Manisa; 5Izmir Public Health Office, Department of Communicable Diseases, Izmir; 6Turkish Public Health Institution, Ankara, Turkey Abstract. West Nile virus (WNV) is an arbovirus maintained in enzootic trans- mission cycles between mosquitoes and birds and is occasionally transmitted to mammals. This study evaluated WNV-infected patients and public health mea- sures taken in Turkey. Upon notification of two cases of WNV neuroinvasive form in October 2016 serological and neutralization tests were performed and clinical and epidemiological surveillance studies conducted. A female patient in Izmir recovered but a male patient in Manisa died from the infection. The prevalence of suspected WNV-infected cases in the two provinces in 2016 varied between 0-22.1 per 100,000 population. However, patients diagnosed with viral encephalitis, arthropod-borne viral encephalitis or mosquito-borne viral encephalitis were not infected with WNV. From a “One Health, One World” perspective, collaboration among veterinary and health authorities, entomologists, environmental special- ists, and biologists, provides the best strategy towards control and prevention of WNV disease in Turkey. Keywords: West Nile virus, prevalence, Turkey INTRODUCTION through birds and mosquitoes, whereas humans and horses are considered dead- West Nile virus (WNV), a single- end hosts (Hubálek and Halouzka, 1999; stranded RNA virus of family Flaviviridae, Petrić et al, 2017).
    [Show full text]