DOCSLIB.ORG

International Architectural Design Competition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Architectural Design Competition INTERNATIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN COMPETITION Presentation of the architectural proposals received as part of this contest for boldness and innovation CULTURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX OF MONTRÉAL Front cover: competitors’ scale models Back cover: models in the urban environment 1 3 1. Opus 4 / Busby + Associates, Proscenium Architecture, Beauchamp Bourbeau Réal Paul, Arcop, architects 2. Saucier + Perrotte / Menkès Shooner Dagenais, architects 2 3. De Architeken Cie. + ÆdificaTPL Architecture 4. Cohlmeyer Architects Limited / Provencher Roy et associés architectes / Jodoin Lamarre Pratte et associés architectes / Cardinal Hardy et associés architectes 5. NOMADE + Lemay 4 5 La Société immobilière du Québec wishes to thank all those who contributed in any manner to the production of this document. TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the president of the jury . 2 Competition jury . 4 Architectural proposals . 5 Laureate De Architekten Cie. + ÆdificaTPL Architecture . 6 Finalists Cohlmeyer Architects Limited / Provencher Roy et associés architectes, Jodoin Lamarre Pratte et associés architectes, Cardinal Hardy et associés architectes . 10 NOMADE + Lemay . 12 Opus 4 / Busby + Associates, Proscenium Architecture, Beauchamp Bourbeau Réal Paul, Arcop, architects . 14 Saucier + Perrotte / Menkès Shooner Dagenais, architects . 16 Honourable mention recipients 3XNielsen A/S . 18 Hal Ingberg architecte / Birtz Bastien Architectes. 19 Hillier . 20 Lea Zeppetelli, architect / O.I. Jean Beaudoin . 21 Massimiliano Fuksas Architetto . 22 Participants in the first stage of the competition. 23 1 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE JURY Merits and Legacy of the Competition Georges Adamczyk, Jury President A Clearinghouse of Original Ideas and Solutions sible for staging this event, the Société immobilière du Québec discharged its mission efficiently, fairly, and to lasting benefit. The international architectural design competition for the Cultural and Administrative Complex of Montréal generated In their respective capacities as competition advisor and sec- considerable enthusiasm from the time of its launching in retary of the event, Mr. André Leguerrier and Mr. Roch Maltais summer 2002, as it was the first international competition of brought enlightened leadership to the project, a contribution its kind to be held in Québec. Through this initiative, the which proved decisive to successfully organizing and running Government of Québec reasserted its determination to grant this major competition, an initiative of the Government of architectural innovators a leading role in the province’s cul- Québec. With the support of the members of the technical tural development. committee, the competition advisor and the secretary ensured strict enforcement of the competition rules, absolute equity A veritable clearinghouse of original ideas and solutions, this among participants, compliance with the principles respecting competition represented an opportunity for pooling the the confidentiality of the authors, and transparency in the research and viewpoints of architects and experts active in selection process. In addition, they provided the president Québec and around the world, along with those of young and the members of the jury with invaluable, insightful assis- firms that have staked out more radical positions concerning tance and kept the project on target with its stated objectives. technical, practical, aesthetic, and planning-related inno- vations. This competition will thus have made an invaluable The make-up of the jury is always a highly sensitive affair, as contribution to the promotion of architecture in Québec. the members should give no indication of harbouring any par- ticular leanings. In the present case, the jury selection process The competition was based on a program having three main attested to a spirit of openness and a steadfast determination objectives: providing the Orchestre symphonique de Montréal to foster animated debate and balanced judgment among the (OSM) with a permanent “home” and a world-class concert jurors. Moreover, the prospect of lively deliberations over the hall, offering the Conservatoire de musique et d’art dramatique major issues of urban planning, architecture and culture raised du Québec à Montréal (CMADM, or Montréal music and theatre by innovative architectural approaches was an additional arts conservatory) a building equipped with specialized equip- argument in favour of eliciting the participation of noted archi- ment in keeping with the institution’s needs, and erecting a tects Oriol Bohigas and Toyo Ito. While their ideas and government building in the Montreal area. The scale of this achievements offer a study in contrast, both authorities share program and the characteristics of its components were con- a distinguished record of actions and influence in urban archi- sonant with the planning issues surrounding the site, located tectural design. The quality of the jury, as a group, served to in the heart of Québec’s cultural metropolis. These particular enhance debates and shape the informed, if occasionally con- requirements, coupled with the objective of meshing com- tested choices that stemmed in all cases from open discussion, ponents so as to produce a coherent yet heterogeneous urban as well as the majority decisions that provided the ultimate whole, compelled finding inventive, innovative solutions. basis for the final consensuses and unanimous decisions. An Organization Equal to the Challenges at Hand As the result of its performance, in terms of organization and implementation alike, this competition has established norms The conduct and management of the competition were equal and criteria that are likely to be looked to as models whenever to the challenges of this ambitious initiative, as was the work international competitions, whether public or private, are of the members of the technical committee and jury, whose launched in Québec in the future. role was advisory. Furthermore, as the organization respon- 2 The Selection The Laureate In the first stage, the selection criteria fell into two different De Architeckten Cie. + ÆdificaTPL Architecture was categories based on the project’s conceptual and technical awarded top honours owing to its ability to bring together, aspects. The first category included the urban planning and within a single typology, the features appropriate to a multi- conceptual approach; the expression of the architectural function building while also satisfactorily responding to the scheme; and the response to symbolic and functional expec- architectural and urban issues surrounding the proposal. The tations, as well as the clarity and detail of the project presentation. seeming simplicity of the proposed construction turns out, The technical aspects covered budget, compliance with the upon closer examination, to possess a more complex geom- architectural design program, technical feasibility, and the etry. Both the drawing and the scale model reveal a polymor- potential for spatial organization in relation to planning objec- phous construction of interior horizontal and vertical spaces tives. It should also be noted that the identity of candidates offering a surprising degree of diversity and potential. was revealed only once the period of candidacy had ended and the jury’s recommendations had been officially approved A Legacy for the Promotion of Architecture and accepted. The value of architectural design competitions extends In the second stage of the competition, the jury’s deliber- beyond their contribution to education, research and experi- ations, taken as a whole, brought out the range of difficulties mentation, their concern for transparency and the dissemin- involved in making choices, given not only the quality of the ation of information, and their invitation to open public entire set of proposals but also the specific, distinct aspects of debate. There is also, at the very outset, the contribution of each. The criteria used to evaluate proposals at this stage also the many architects who responded to these invitations and fell into two categories: architectural aspects, on the one who, so doing, were prompted to question their own hand, and general evaluation and compliance-related approaches and delve into their technical and creative aspects, on the other. More specifically, the architectural resources. Such, in short, are the merits on which this event is aspects consisted of the formal intent and resolution of archi- likely to bequeath an enduring legacy. tectural composition; the insertion in context (site and build- For these merits and this legacy, I should like, in my capacity ing); the quality of spaces, particularly in public areas; the as chairman of the jury, to express my deep appreciation to organization of space, traffic, connections between project the many people who replied to our invitation and who, components; the response to symbolic and functional expec- thanks to the quality of their proposals, helped make this tations; the choice of materials (durability and upkeep); the competition a major professional event. My thanks go, as strategies for inception of sustainable development; and the well, to the members of the jury and the technical commitee clarity and detail of the project presentation itself. General for their contribution to this resounding success. aspects of evaluation and program compliance included the functional and operational approach adopted in respect of the As professor and director of the Université de
Load more

Recommended publications
  • La Construction Et Le Mythe De La Place Des Arts
    ANALYSIS | ANALYSE PRIX 2006 LA CONSTRUCTION ET LE MYTHE MARTIN ELI WEIL DE LA PLACE DES ARTS : PRIZE GENÈSE DE LA PLACE MONTRÉALAISE Récipiendaire du prix Martin Eli-Weil 2006, > JONATHAN CHA JONATHAN CHA est doctorant en études urbaines à l’UQAM, en cotutelle avec l’Institut d’urbanisme de Paris (IUP) de l’Université de Paris XII. Sa thèse de doctorat porte sur la morphogenèse et la sémiogenèse des parcs, places et jardins INTRODUCTION à Montréal ; elle vise à caractériser la « place 1 montréalaise » comme forme et comme sens La Place des Arts (PdA) est aujourd’hui de la ville. Il est récipiendaire des Bourses du un lieu ancré dans le patrimoine com- mun montréalais (ill. 1). Si sa place sur Canada au doctorat et à la maîtrise en plus d’être l’échiquier patrimonial paraît évidente boursier du Gouvernement français. Architecte aujourd’hui, il n’en aura pas moins fallu paysagiste, membre agréé de la Canadian près de quarante ans pour que le patri- Society of Landscape Architects, il est associé à moine « des uns » devienne le patrimoine l’Institut du patrimoine, à la Chaire de recherche « de tous ». Prévue dès sa planification du Canada en patrimoine urbain et au Centre comme monument à l’image du Stade interuniversitaire d’études sur les lettres, les arts olympique, sa reconnaissance internatio- et les traditions (CÉLAT) de l’UQAM. nale s’opposera à un refus d’acceptation populaire du symbole. La Place des Arts de Montréal est née d’une vision – d’un rêve – de situer Montréal au rang des grandes capitales de la modernité et d’un mythe reposant sur la volonté de s’im- planter sur un lieu fondateur ancré dans l’histoire géographique de la ville.
    [Show full text]
  • Principal's Message
    Principal’s Message 2008-09 Welcome to McGill! For more than 185 years, McGill has distinguished itself as one of the world’s great public universities, renowned for outstanding students, professors and alumni, for achievement in teaching and research, and for its distinctive international character. As one of the top 12 universities in the world, McGill’s defi ning strengths include its unwavering commitment to excellence, and a willingness to be judged by the highest standards. And by these standards, McGill has excelled far beyond any reasonable expectations. We have produced a disproportionate number of Nobel laureates and Rhodes scholars. Olympians, award-winning authors and musicians, astronauts, medical pioneers and world-famous leaders in all walks of life are counted among our alumni — remarkable individuals who have shaped our society and the course of history itself in profound ways. As students you are at the core of all that we do. Your time at McGill offers more than an excellent education. It is a critical period of personal and intellectual discovery and growth, and one that will help shape your understanding of the world. By choosing McGill, you are following in the footsteps of almost 200,000 living McGill alumni across the globe and making a commitment to excellence, as they did. And, while a lot is expected of you, McGill gives you the means to succeed. All of McGill’s 21 faculties and professional schools strive to offer the best education possible. By joining the McGill community of scholars, you will experience the University’s vibrant learning environment and active and diverse campus life, which support both academic progress and personal development.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Fellows Honoraires – Hon
    COLLEGE OF FELLOWS COLLÈGE DES FELLOWS 2 0 1 0 Honorary Fellows – Hon. FRAIC, 2010 Fellows honoraires – Hon. FIRAC, 2010 Manfredi Nicoletti Christian Ouellet Sunand Prasad Manfredi Nicoletti Manfredi Nicoletti, Master in Architecture M.I.T., USA, recently appointed “Commandeur de l’Ordre des Arts et des Lettres” by the French Government; Emeritus Professor at the Rome University “La Sapienza”; Honorary Fellow of the American Institute of Architects; Vice President of the International Academy of Architecture; Member of the Academy of Russia, the International Academy of Moscow and the Architecture Academy of France. Collaboration with Walter Gropius, Minorou Yamasaki and P.L. Nervi, Manfredi Honorary Fellow Nicoletti is a pioneer in Megastructures and in Bioclimatic Urban and Architectural Design; Expert in Architectural Ecology for the Italian Government and the European Community, member of the Italian Institute of Bioclimatic Architecture (ENEA), of Eurosolar, and of PLEA (Passive and Low Energy Association); he received the International Award of WREN (World Renewable Energy Network). Among the many projects built and on the process of being built: the Kazakhstan Central Concert Hall for 3500 seats, Astana; the Nigeria National Complex and the Millennium Park in Abuja; the Halls of Justice of Arezzo, Rome, Lecce, Campobasso, and Reggio Calabria; The G8 Conference Centre, Palazzo Marini, Rome; the Palermo Sport Palace; the University Campus of Udine; the Agrigento General Hospital; the Tropical Butterfly Greenhouse in Catania; the Putrajaya Waterfront development in Kuala Lumpur. Among the many International Competitions awards received: the Museum of Modern Art in Warsaw, Poland; the Acropolis Museum, Athens; the Taiwan Centres for Disease Control Complex, Taipei; the Yeosu Expo pavilion, South Korea; the Bibliotheca Alexandrina, Egypt; the Cardiff Bay Opera House, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • HAZEN EDWARD SISE MG 30, D 187 Finding Aid No. 531 / Instrument De Recherche No 531
    National Archives Archives nationales of Canada du Canada Manuscript Division des Division manuscrits HAZEN EDWARD SISE MG 30, D 187 Finding Aid No. 531 / Instrument de recherche no 531 Prepared by W. Smith for Economic Préparé par W. Smith de la section des and Scientific Archives Section Archives économiques et scientifiques and revised in 1984 by en 1975 et révisé en 1984 par David Enns David Enns Came - 11 - TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Introduction iii Family Papers 1 Personal Papers 9 Career Files 16 Associations 23 Subject Files 34 Clippings 49 Items in horizontal storage 52 Volumes 11, 12 and 14 and parts of volumes 6 and 7 are restricted. Consult the Economic Scientific Archives Section for further information. Acoess Itestrlcted I ^ccë: ëserv0 t a e , ssiar MG 30 SISE, Hazen Edward (1906-1974). Architect. D 187 Originals, n.d., 1734-1974. 9.14 m. Transcripts, 1938. 75 pages. Finding Aid No. 531. Hazen Edward Sise was born in Montreal and educated at the Royal Military College, McGill University School of Architecture, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology School of Architecture. Sise apprenticed with the influential Le Corbusier in Paris in 1930 and participated in the "Rejected Architects Exhibition" in New York City. He returned to Europe to work, first in Paris in 1931, then in London from 1933 to 1936. In December 1936 Sise met Dr. Norman Bethune and joined his Hispano-Canadian Blood Transfusion Institute in the Spanish Civil War. When Sise returned to Montreal in November 1937 he became active in the Committee to Aid Spanish Democracy, the Friends of the Mackenzie-Papineau Battalion and H.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Montreal: a Landscape of Modern America
    Montreal: A Landscape of Modern America YVES DESCHAMPS , UNI V ERSITE DE MONTREAL "What to see in Montreal? ... Everything - it is one great building project .... " - Andre Blouin (1965) 1 ndre Blouin, a significant contributor to Montreal's "need for transportation" together with "growth" as the main A architecture in the 1960s, both through his design factors required in the renewal of a city. 3 And indeed, the result­ work and through his te ac hings at the Ecole d'architecture de ing ease -wes t Metropolitan Boulevard drastically redesigned Montreal, was justified to hope for the best as he wrote an the city. Far to the north of the old city centre, in what had article to inform his colleagues across Canada about what to been essentially an empty quarter, it created a new centre, so look for in Montreal on the occasion of Expo 67. Expo itself, to speak, a speedway slicing through a no-man's land. It also arguably the premier event to take place in the city during this opened the northern half of the is land to urbanization and century, was largely a celebration of modern city pl anning, integrated its eastern and western ends into this new urban architecture, and design. These disciplines were set to create a space. Lastly, it brought to the city the new experience of a better world, for which Montreal would be the laboratory and rapid, indifferent, almost blind transit through a variety of the prototype .2 Three decades later, Expo appears not as the hitherto more-or-less marginal spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • History by Norbert Schoenauer
    History by Norbert Schoenauer Introduction University education of architects in North America began during the late 1860's and represented a new approach to professional training. William Baston Rogers, president of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, established the first School of Architecture. From the beginning, when M.I.T.'s charter was granted in 1860, Rogers had included architecture in his plans for technical higher education, first, because he modeled M.I.T. on the German Polytechnic of Karlsruhe, and second, because, having taught for seventeen years at Jefferson's Charlottesville campus, he was appreciative of architecture. Rogers chose William Ware, a former student in Richard Morris Hunt's atelier, to head the new School. Ware began his teaching in 1868 after having studied European architectural education for a couple of years. The second school of architecture was established at the University of Illinois in 1867, and instruction commenced in January 1870. The first teacher at this school was James Bellangee who was a graduate in science and had but briefly worked in an architectural office in Chicago and, one and a half years later, the Swedish architect Harald M. Hansen, who had studied for two years at the BauAkademie in Berlin, was appointed to lead the school. Cornell University established its School of Architecture in 1871. This third school was headed by Charles Babcock, a pupil and son-in-law of British trained Richard Upjohn. During the following two decades, seven other new schools of architecture were founded in the U.S.A.: Syracuse University was fourth; University of Pennsylvania, fifth; University of Michigan, sixth; Columbia University, seventh; Columbia (later George Washington) University, eighth: Armour now Illinois) Institute of Technology, ninth; and Harvard University, tenth.' McGill University's School of Architecture was established one year after Harvard's in 1896.
    [Show full text]
  • Gabriel Mackinnon Lighting Design
    Gabriel Mackinnon provides professional consultant services as specialists in lighting design. The firm, established in Ottawa in 1974, has since completed projects across a wide range of architectural environments including schools, theatres, museums, hotels, stores, churches, and historic restorations. Andrew Mackinnon has been active in the lighting industry for more than fifteen years. He is proud to represent the Canadian independent architectural lighting design industry as the Regional coordinator for the newly formed Canadian region of the IALD. He is also President of the Ottawa section of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IES). He is also active in prototype fixture development, custom fixture design and lighting research. Gabriel Mackinnon has received awards from The Royal Architectural Institute, International Association of Lighting Designers, Canadian Architect, Illuminating Engineering Society and the Canadian Historical Association. As well, the firm’s work has been published in many professional media. 1-109 Murray Street | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5M5 | 613 241 1822 | fax 613 241 3197 | www.gabrielmackinnon.com URBAN SPACES AND EXTERIOR LIGHTING Edmonton Federal Building Centennial Plaza; AB; Kasian Architects & Alberta Infrastructure, 2014 Old Town Toronto, Lighting Master Plan; 2011 Brockville Court House; Heritage Façade; Brockville, ON; Genivar; 2011 Bank Street Rehabilitation, Ottawa, IBI, 2006-2011 City of Ottawa Right of Way Lighting Policy; City of Ottawa & Mcormick Rankin Engineers; 2008 Pretoria Bridge, Delcan; Ottawa, ON; 2008 Corktown Footbridge, Dutoit Allsopp Hillier; Ottawa, ON; 2006 Preston Street Arch, Ottawa; decorative lighting, 2005. University of Ottawa; Lighting Master Plan and Implementation; Murray & Murray Architects; 1992-2009 Parliamentary Precinct; Ottawa; Exterior Lighting Strategy and Application; Public Works Government Services Canada; 1993-2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Bonaventure: Architecture and the Anxiety of Influence
    Place Bonaventure: Architecture and the Anxiety of Influence .JAMES A. VILORIA, CANADIAN CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE he design of an architectural form and the reception of tunity to view the built environment from many perspec­ T the completed structure are both influenced by numer­ tives. The eclectic staff assembled by Bland in the 1940s ous factors. While architects strive to incorporate theoretical included Canadian designer and painter Gordon Webber.3 ideas into the built environment, writers and the general McGill graduate Arthur Erickson recalled that Webber, public may interpret meanings different from those initially whose own artworks incorporated various media, "made you intended. There exists a commonly held notion that archi­ study the potential of materials, following Bauhaus methods."4 tectural identity is fixed or homogeneous. This belief is Swiss-born architect Frederic Lasserre, who later was to play a challenged by an understanding of the diversity or anxiety of central role in the establishment of the University of British influences that shape both the design and the reception of a Columbia's school of architecture, expressed the need for building. Canadian architects to play the "democratic" role of "intermed­ Place Bonaventure, a multi-use reinforced concrete com­ iary between the building industry .. and town planning which plex in downtown Montreal (Figure 1), was designed and represents the interests of society - of the people."5 Lasserre built in 1964-67 by the architectural firm Affleck, Desbarats, perceived the postwar Canadian architect as a "servant" of the Dimakopoulos, Lebensold & Sise, informally known as "Archi­ nation, but cautioned that the designer could not perform this 6 tects in Cooperative Partnership" (ARCOP).
    [Show full text]
  • Expo 67, Or the Architecture of Late Modernity
    Expo 67, or the Architecture of Late Modernity Inderbir Singh Riar Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 2014 Inderbir Singh Riar All rights reserved Abstract Expo 67, or the Architecture of Late Modernity Inderbir Singh Riar The 1967 Universal and International Exhibition, the Montreal world’s fair commonly known as Expo 67, produced both continuations of and crises in the emancipatory project of modern architecture. Like many world’s fairs before it, Expo 67 was designed to mediate relations between peoples and things through its architecture. The origins of this work lay in the efforts of Daniel van Ginkel and Blanche Lemco van Ginkel, architects and town planners who, in remarkable reports, drawings, and architectural ideals advanced between 1962 and 1963, outlined the basis of a fundamentally new, though never fully realised, world’s fair in the late twentieth century. Party to the Congrès Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne and its influential prewar edicts on functionalist town planning as well as to groups like Team 10 and their opposition to diagrammatic generalisations by an emphasis on the personal, the particular, and the precise, the van Ginkels also drew on contemporary theories and practices of North American urban renewal when first conceiving Expo 67 as an instrument for redeveloping downtown Montreal. The resulting work, Man and the City, which officially secured the world’s fair bid but remained unbuilt, carefully drew on the legacies of most great exhibitions, especially those of the nineteenth century, in order to conceive of sufficiently heroic structures making immanent novel forms of human interaction, social control, and the technical organisation of space.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Ville---Marie
    A Long--Term Perspective on Place Ville---Marie FRANCE VANLAETHEM, UNIVERSITE ou QuEBEC A. MoNTREAL ISABELLE GOURNAY, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND naugurated in 1962, Montreal's Place Ville-Marie clearly I marks the affirmation of architectural modernity in Quebec (figure 1) . It was undertaken by New York developer William Zeckendorf, who had been called on by Canadian National Railways to study the portion of downtown Montreal ripped open by laying the company's north-south rail lines, and designed by Ieoh Ming Pei's team of Harvard architecture graduates. This huge commercial and office complex, includ­ ing the landmark 45-storey Royal Bank tower, dominates a vast urban esplanade that covers an intricate layering of below­ grade circulation networks. With the creation of this "multi­ purpose, multilevel core," Montreal, in the eyes of many critics, jumped to "the forefront of urban design."1 This achievement stands as a clear indication of the important role played by American expertise in Montreal's real estate market. The project was not without local and international precedents, however, both from architectural and socioeconomic points of view. Indeed, it had been common practice to hire American architects in Montreal since the late 19th century, when the scale of the city's archi­ tecture began to increase. Furthermore, the Place Ville-Marie project was the culmination of a long-term urban renewal effort linked to a modernization of the rail transportation system that had been initiated by the Canadian Northern Railway Company in the 1910s and continued by Canadian National Railways after the former was nationalized in 1922.
    [Show full text]
  • Julia Gersovitz Resume
    JULIA GERSOVITZ, Sr. Architect ‐ Partner OAQ, OAA, FRAIC, FAPT, CAHP Professional Affiliations OAA ‐ Ontario Association of Architects (1995) OAQ ‐ Quebec Order of Architects (1978) FRAIC ‐ Fellow of the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada (1995) FAPT ‐ Fellow of the Association for Preservation Technology International (2008) CAHP ‐ Member of the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals Master of Science ‐ Historic Preservation, Columbia University, New York City, 1980 Bachelor of Architecture with distinction, McGill University, Montreal, 1975 Bachelor of Science in Architecture with distinction, McGill University, Montreal 1974 With 39 years of professional experience with heritage buildings, 31 of them in private practice, Julia Gersovitz’s commitment to excellence in conservation expresses itself in three interrelated sectors ‐ private practice, teaching and design review commissions. As a senior partner, Julia is responsible for many of the management tasks associated with a project: she is the primary contact with the client, responsible for presentations and for the assessment of client’s needs in order to set the project on course. She determines the conceptual design, the conservation strategies and oversees all aspects of the project, through the end of construction. The project architect reports to her, usually on a daily basis, in order to ensure that the milestones are met, the budget respected and the schedule is on target. Julia has a mastery of the philosophical, functional, regulatory and technical issues related to intervening in heritage contexts. Her ability to reconcile protection needs with contemporary expectations has been recognized in numerous award‐winning projects and accounts for her reputation as a national leader in the field of conservation and rehabilitation of historic buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Architect Image Archive At
    Ryerson University Digital Commons @ Ryerson Theses and dissertations 1-1-2010 A Subject Index : The aC nadian Architect Image Archive At Ryerson University Library's Special Collections Katherine Shoemaker Ryerson University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ryerson.ca/dissertations Part of the Photography Commons Recommended Citation Shoemaker, Katherine, "A Subject Index : The aC nadian Architect Image Archive At Ryerson University Library's Special Collections" (2010). Theses and dissertations. Paper 1489. This Major Research Paper is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Ryerson. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Ryerson. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A SUBJECT INDEX: THE CANADIAN ARCHITECT IMAGE ARCHIVE AT RYERSON UNIVERSITY LIBRARY’S SPECIAL COLLECTIONS by Katherine Shoemaker BA, Art History & Studio Art Majors, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, 2007 A professional practice project presented to Ryerson University, Art Gallery of Ontario & George Eastman House International Museum of Photography and Film in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the program of Photographic Preservation and Collections Management Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2010 © Shoemaker 2010 i Author's Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this thesis to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. Signature I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this thesis by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research.
    [Show full text]