DOCSLIB.ORG

1.1 Health Inequalities Duties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1.1 Health Inequalities Duties Cambridgeshire and Peterborough CCG Amended from NHS E documentation 17 th March 2017 1.1 Health Inequalities Duties The Health and Social Care Act 2012 established the first specific legal duties on NHS England to have regard to the need to reduce inequalities between patients in access to, and outcomes from, healthcare services and in securing that services are provided in an integrated way. These duties had legal effect from April 1st 2013. The duties require that NHS England properly and seriously takes into account inequalities when making decisions or exercising functions, and has evidence of compliance with the duties, whilst also assessing how well CCGs have discharged their legal duties on health inequalities. What is meant by “…have regard to…” in the duties? • Lawyers advise that “having regard to the need to reduce” means health inequalities must be properly and seriously taken into account when making decisions or exercising functions, including balancing that need against any countervailing factors. • Part of having due regard includes accurate record keeping of how the need to reduce health inequalities have been taken into account. Health Inequalities Analysis Please complete the template by applying each question to your work, referring to the best available evidence. We strongly advise that you use and work though the supporting questions in Annex A . 2 Health Inequalities Analysis Evidence 1. What evidence have you considered to determine what health inequalities exist in relation to your work? List the main sources of data, research and other sources of evidence (including full references) reviewed to determine impact on each equality group (protected characteristic). This can include national research, surveys, reports, research interviews, focus groups, pilot activity evaluations or other Equality Analyses. If there are gaps in evidence, state what you will do to mitigate them in the Evidence based decision making section on the last page of this template. Answer To carry out this impact analysis for health inequalities the following sources of information have been considered: • End of Consultation Report ( CCG, March 2017) • Travel Time Estimates (Google Maps based on departure at 18.00 on 14 th March 2017) • Local Provider Transport Survey Data (HUC, Four Week Period; ~14 th February – 9th March 2017) • Local OOH Admissions Data (HUC, 19 th October – 19 th December 2016) • Local 111 Call Data (HUC, 2014-2017 – partly forecasted) • Migrant and Refugee Joint Strategic Needs Assessment for Cambridgeshire (2016) • Indices of Multiple Deprivation (2015) • R&P 2013 Mid-Year Estimates (Cambridgeshire City Council, 2013) • ONS Census Data (2011) • Travellers Joint Strategic Needs Assessment for Cambridgeshire (2010) The catchment area of the Out of Hours (OOH) service is Cambridgeshire, excluding Peterborough, Fenland, Huntingdon and Ely as they have other relevant OOH services in their area. The population most affected by this change live within Cambridge City. Based on Cambridgeshire County Council estimates based on ONS Census data (2011), the population is 130,000. Please see Appendix Table 1. Analysis of OOH attendance data (Appendix Table 2) shows that 50% of face-to-face consultations within the OOH Service are for patients who live in within Cambridge City . 2 Appendix Table 3 shows the breakdown of 111 calls and face to face visits by practice around Cambridge City. Age Appendix Figure 1 shows the distribution of face to face visits to Chesterton Out of Hours Centre by age. The largest age group attending face to face are for children aged 0-9 years old who make up 36% of face to face OOH consultations. Income inequality The Centre for Cities report has analysed inequality in income and notes that Cambridge is the most unequal city in the country. Reference: http://www.centreforcities.org/publication/cities-outlook-2017/ Ethnicity Eastern Europeans The Migrant and Refugee Joint Strategic Needs Assessment for Cambridgeshire, 2016 notes that “Primary schools in the Cambridge City district area with the highest proportion of pupils who speak an A8 language are located in the Arbury, Kings Hedges and Chesterton areas – on the north side of Cambridge city.” Similarly, it notes that “Of the 10 secondary schools in Cambridgeshire with the highest percentages of children who primarily speak an EU A8 language at home, three are in Cambridge City, two in Fenland, two in South Cambridgeshire, two in Huntingdonshire and one in East Cambridgeshire. For example, North Cambs Academy ranks as the second highest schools with 9.3% of its pupil population primarily speaking an EU A8 language at home. The JSNA also notes that data from the school census shows higher numbers of people from Poland in Cambridge city, particularly in the north part of the city – Arbury and Kings Hedges. Travelling Community The Traveller JSNA 2010 on Cambridge Insight Website acknowledges that it is extremely difficult to gather data on this population but notes that Gypsies and Travellers make up almost 1% of the population in Cambridgeshire and represent the largest ethnic minority in the county. In Cambridgeshire it is estimated that approximately 70% are Romany Gypsies, 20% are Irish Travellers and 10% are others including Scottish and Welsh Travellers and an increasing number of Eastern European Gypsies. There appears to be a difference in demographics across the county with a higher number of Irish Travellers in South Cambridgeshire and Eastern European Roma in Fenland. 3 Impact 2. What is the potential impact of your work on health inequalities? Can you demonstrate through evidenced based consideration how the health outcomes, experience and access to health care services differ across the population group and in different geographical locations that your work applies to? Answer : • This is an “as is” transfer of the location of the service. Exactly the same service will be available to people before and after the proposed change. • This change concerns face to face consultations at a base. To be offered one of these all patients are first triaged by a clinician and assessed on whether they need urgent direct referral to Accident and Emergency. • The location of base is changing by 4 miles. • Any additional travel time is therefore unlikely to present a change in clinical risk. • The impact on inequalities in health outcome is assessed as likely to be neutral. • Access time to the proposed new base will change and this is assessed in the next section. 3. Will this work produce any specific changes in inequalities in access? Answer : • The proposal is to change the location but not the nature of the service which is offered. • Appendix Figure 2 shows that the most frequent location of residence for people coming to the Chesterton base for face to face review is CB4, followed by CB1. • Appendix Figure 3 shows that shows that there is a greater count of face to face attendees from the more deprived areas of the city. Given the established relationship between deprivation and health need this is not an unexpected finding. • Appendix Figure 4 shows that attendance rate increases with index of multiple deprivation of GP practice to a moderate degree. The key question for changes in inequalities in access are 4 1) How do people currently travel to face to face out of hours consultations at the Chesterton base? 2) What would be the impact on their travel if the base moved to the CUFHT site? Current travel to Chesterton base for face to face consultations. Please see Appendix Table 4 which shows that in a recent survey no patient used public transport and 72% arrived by private car. Impact on travel if the base moved to CUFHT Appendix Figure 6 shows that the five most deprived practices do have an increase in travel distance to the Out of Hours base of between a half (for the most deprived practice) and four miles. Appendix Figure 9 shows that the five most deprived practices do have an increase in travel times by car to the proposed new Out of Hours base. This increase is between 2 minutes (for the most deprived practice) and 19 minutes. The conclusion is that people registered with the most deprived practices will have further to travel for a face to face out of hours consultation. However they are likely to be making this journey by car and the absolute distances and time increase is small. For the most deprived practice the increase in time and distance is negligible (half a mile and 2 minutes car travel time). Impact on Travellers As part of the consultation the Cambridgeshire County Council Traveller Health Team has been contacted. They note that: “Change is easier for some people than others. The ease of access is valuable at the current location, parking is an important factor. Giving people permission to go to Addenbrookes for minor things could be confusing given recent messages about avoiding using A&E, even though it is different departments, the difference might not be clear to people.” (End of Consultation Report Appendix C). 4. Will this work produce any specific changes in inequalities in health outcome? Answer: This proposal is about changes in location, not in services and will not produce changes in outcome. See note under (2) above. • This is an “as is” transfer of the location of the service. Exactly the same service will be available to people before and after the proposed change. • This change concerns face to face consultations at a base. To be offered one of these all patients are first triaged by a clinician and assessed on whether they need urgent direct referral to Accident and Emergency. 5 • The location of base is changing by 4 miles. • Any additional travel time is therefore unlikely to present a change in clinical risk. • The impact on inequalities in health outcome is assessed as likely to be neutral.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dear Sirs, A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon
    My ref: Your ref: Date: 12 June 2015 Contact: Direct dial: 01223 7175471 E Mail: [email protected] Office of Economy, Transport and Environment Services Executive Director, Graham Hughes Transport and Infrastructure Policy & Funding Box No: SH1310 Cambridgeshire County Council Shire Hall Castle Hill Cambridge CB3 0AP Dear Sirs, A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon – First Round of Questions Please find below the answers to the first round of questions asked of Cambridgeshire County Council, where Cambridgeshire County Council is able to provide an answer. In terms of the questions asked generally of “local authorities” relating to noise and air quality, the County Council refers the Examining Authority to the answers from the District Councils and City Council. Question Reference: Q1.1.17 Question: Dust from construction is identified as a significant effect which could be mitigated through best practice measures implemented via the Code of Construction Practice. If best practice measures are not followed by contractors or prove to be ineffective, what further action can be taken by local authorities to control these effects? Response: Compliance with the Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) is a Requirement (No 3) on the Secretary of State. The County Council is seeking a revision to this Requirement to secure consultation with local authorities in its development and of the CEMP and Local Environmental Management Plans, to ensure that the CoCP is an effective management tool. If Highways England fails to comply with a Requirement in the made DCO it becomes in the opinion of the County Council an enforceable matter under Part 8 of the Planning Act 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • A Market Town Plan for Ely
    Appendix 1 A Market Town Plan for Ely 1 Contents About this document 3 Introduction 4 A vision for Ely 5 Area of focus 1: Station gateway 15 Area of focus 2: City Centre 19 Area of focus 3: Connectivity 24 Implementation Plan 28 2 About this document This document has been commissioned by the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority (CPCA), working in partnership with East Cambridgeshire District Council. This Market Town Plan is a series of living documents, owned and updated by local partners including the District Council and the Combined Authority. The devolution deal which created the combined authority recognises the important role of market town economies in growing the wider Cambridgeshire and Peterborough economy. A masterplan for each of the eleven market towns across the region provides the opportunity to look at the unique features of each town, and offers deliverables which will benefit the immediate and wider economy. This Market Town Plan for Ely endorses Mayor James Palmer’s target for the combined authority region to double its Gross Value Added (GVA) over the next twenty-five years. To achieve this, market town economies must ‘do their bit’ – the interventions outlined in this document have been selected for the purpose of achieving this. We don’t expect everything in this document to be funded immediately. There are some quick wins where an injection of funding can get things moving. For other projects, we will need to spend time developing detailed plans and compelling investment cases before we can begin to leverage in funding. While the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority (CPCA) has funded this report, and is keen to invest in our city, we know we will need to build a coalition of supporters, including central government, to get some of the schemes detailed here delivered.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Document for Health and Wellbeing Board, 05/12/2016 13:00
    Public Document Pack AB HEALTH AND WELLBEING BOARD MONDAY 5 DECEMBER 2016 1.00 PM Bourges/Viersen Room - Town Hall Contact – [email protected], 01733 452508 AGENDA Page No 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Declarations of Interest 3. Minutes of the meeting held on 22 September 2016 3 - 6 4. Hydrotherapy 7 - 8 5. Health & Wellbeing and SPP Partnership Delivery Programme Board 9 - 46 Update 6. Healthwatch Update 47 - 60 7. Work in Peterborough - Recruitment and Retention Campaign 61 - 64 8. LGA Peer Review Of Adult Social Care 65 - 68 9. Annual Report of Peterborough Safeguarding Boards 69 - 208 10. PRISM (Enhanced Primary Care Mental Health Service) 209 - 214 11. Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Sustainability and Transformation 215 - 232 Programme Memorandum of Understanding for NHS Organisations in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough 12. Sustainability and Transformation Plan Update 233 - 246 INFORMATION AND OTHER ITEMS 13. Adult Social Care, Better Care Fund (BCF) Update 247 - 250 14. Devolution (Verbal Update) There is an induction hearing loop system available in all meeting rooms. Some of the systems are infra-red operated, if you wish to use this system then please contact Paulina Ford on 01733 452508 as soon as possible. 15. Schedule of Future Meetings and Draft Agenda Programme 251 - 252 To note the dates and agree future agenda items for the Board. To include frequency of reporting from other Boards, where appropriate, including Local Safeguarding Boards, Children’s and Adults Commissioning Boards, LCG Commissioning Board. Also to consider how we will monitor progress against the Health and Wellbeing strategy. Recording of Council Meetings: Any member of the public may film, audio-record, take photographs and use social media to report the proceedings of any meeting that is open to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Diabetes in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough CCG July 2015
    Data supplement: Diabetes in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough CCG July 2015 Introduction This is one in a series of Data Supplements providing intelligence to inform future health and social care planning for the population registered with Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Clinical Commissioning Group (C&P CCG) GP practices produced in support of Cambridgeshire JSNA: Long Term Conditions Across the Lifecourse (2015). Background Diabetes is a lifelong metabolic condition in which the body does not produce sufficient insulin to regulate blood glucose levels. The two main types of diabetes, that account for about 98% of all diagnosed patients, are Type 1a and Type 2.b What is the prevalence and who is at risk? The risk of diabetes increases with age. In 2010 the national prevalence of diabetes was 0.4% for people aged 16 to 24 years, rising to 15.1% for people aged 70 to 84 years old. The higher prevalence of diabetes among older people is due to a higher risk of developing Type 2 diabetes at older ages.1 Diabetes in people aged 17 and over Nearly 40,000 people aged 17 and 8 over are recorded on disease 7 registers for diabetes in general 6 practices across Cambridgeshire and 5 Peterborough CCG. 4 The prevalence of diabetes is lower 3 in C&P CCG as a whole compared 2 Prevalence (%) with the England average (5.6% vs 1 6.2%). However, in Hunts Care 5313 7366 3060 6440 3142 4937 6931 2813 0 Partners, Wisbech, Isle of Ely and Peterborough LCGs, prevalence is higher than both the CCG and national averages.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMBRIDGESHIRE HEALTH and WELLBEING BOARD Date
    CAMBRIDGESHIRE HEALTH AND WELLBEING BOARD Date:Thursday, 19 January 2017 Democratic and Members' Services Quentin Baker LGSS Director: Lawand Governance 10:00hr Shire Hall Castle Hill Cambridge CB3 0AP Kreis Viersen Room Shire Hall, Castle Hill, Cambridge, CB3 0AP AGENDA Open to Public and Press 1 Apologies for absence and declarations of interest Guidance on declaring interests is available at http://tinyurl.com/ccc-dec-of-interests 2 Minutes of the Meeting on 17 November 2016 and Action Log 5 - 18 3 A Person's Story A verbal report. 4 Outcomes from 17 November 2016 Development Session 19 - 54 5 Cambridgeshire Better Care Fund Planning 2017-19 55 - 62 6 Priority 1 Report from the Children's Trust Executive Partnership 63 - 82 7 Update Report - New Housing Developments and the Built 83 - 86 Environment Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Page 1 of 238 8 Update on the Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment for 87 - 106 Cambridgeshire (2017) and Public Consultation January to March 2017 9 Sustainability and Transformation Programme (STP) 107 - 132 10 Health and Care Sustainability and Transformation Programme 133 - 144 Memorandum of Understanding - Local Authority Appendix 11 Mental Health Strategy Framework 145 - 188 12 Primary Care Strategy - Focus on GP Recruitment and Retention in 189 - 202 Cambridgeshire 13 Quality Premium 203 - 234 14 Forward Agenda Plan January 2017 235 - 238 15 Appointments to External Bodies To appoint a representative of the Health and Wellbeing Board to sit on the Primary Care Co-Commissioning Joint Committee. Information about the Committee is available at: http://www.cambridgeshireandpeterboroughccg.nhs.uk/primary-care-co- commissioning-joint-committee.htm 16 Date of Next Meeting The Health and Wellbeing Board will meet next on Thursday 30 March 2017 at 10.00am in the Council Chamber, South Cambridgeshire Hall, Cambourne, Cambridge CB23 6EA.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report September 2018
    Final Report September 2018 www.cpier.org.uk The Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Independent Economic Review (CPIER) The Economic Review is the product of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Independent Economic Commission. This Commission was established by the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority (CPCA) in June 2017. It is chaired by Dame Kate Barker, and its other members are: Dr David Cleevely CBE, Sir David Arculus, Dame Carol Black, Matthew Bullock, Professor Diane Coyle CBE, Mark Dorsett, Warren East, Professor Alan Hughes, Professor Andy Neely, John Shropshire OBE and Lord David Willetts1. Its terms of reference were agreed at a Board Meeting of the CPCA, and are as follows: The Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Independent Economic Commission (IEC) will: • Develop an authoritative evidence base on the economic performance and potential of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough and its component parts that commands attention at the highest levels of government; • Reframe thinking about devolution within the UK policy debate – exploring the potential for devolution to unlock growth and improve social outcomes in multi-centred economies as well as in England’s core and key cities; • Provide impartial advice and guidance, on an ongoing basis, on the performance and growth of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough economy; • Inform choices on policy priorities and strategic investment that are made locally, at the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough level, at national level and at European level; and • Foster a common understanding of the future development of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough’s economy and the long term drivers for change across local partners, Whitehall, and Ministers. The IEC will provide a robust and independent assessment of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough economy and its potential for growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Cancer in England: a Report on Incidence, Survival and Mortality
    Title goes here as running header Oral cancer in England A report on incidence, survival and mortality rates of oral cancer in England, 2012 to 2016 1 Oral cancer in England About Public Health England Public Health England exists to protect and improve the nation’s health and wellbeing and reduce health inequalities. We do this through world-leading science, research, knowledge and intelligence, advocacy, partnerships and the delivery of specialist public health services. We are an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care, and a distinct delivery organisation with operational autonomy. We provide government, local government, the NHS, Parliament, industry and the public with evidence-based professional, scientific and delivery expertise and support. Public Health England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG Tel: 020 7654 8000 www.gov.uk/phe Twitter: @PHE_uk Facebook: www.facebook.com/PublicHealthEngland For queries relating to this document, please contact: [email protected] © Crown copyright 2020 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence, visit OGL. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Published May 2020 PHE publications PHE supports the UN gateway number: GW-1209 Sustainable Development Goals 2 Oral cancer in England Contents Oral cancer in England 1 About Public Health England 2 Executive summary 4 1. Introduction 5 2. Methods 6 3. Results 7 4. Discussion and conclusion 31 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality Analysis of Hypertension in Cambridgeshire & Peterborough
    Inequality analysis of hypertension in Cambridgeshire & Peterborough (August 2020) Background Persistent hypertension increases the risk of many serious conditions, including heart disease and heart attack, stroke, aortic aneurysm, kidney disease and vascular dementia. It is often asymptomatic and unnoticed by patients (1). The cost to NHS in England from conditions attributable to high blood pressure has been estimated to be £2 billion (2). Hypertension may be associated with increased Covid-19 severity and risk of death in older people although evidence is mixed and still emerging. According to the ISARIC report (updated as of 19 May) a frequency of comorbidities analysis show 45.7% of individuals that contracted Sars-Cov-2 had an history of hypertension (1,012 over 2,212 of patients) - to be noted though that the authors warn that this data should be taken into consideration with caution as the sample size is small due to it being a new variable in their dataset (3). Similarly, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, respiratory disease, and cancers were all associated with increased risk of death due to Covid-19 in a large Chinese study describing 44,672 confirmed cases, but which lacked age-correction (4). Hypertension is very strongly associated with age and when the OpenSAFELY Collaborative study adjusted for this, they showed that in the UK there was no association between hypertension and COVID-19 (HR 0.95, 0.89-1.01) (5). However, in sensitivity analyses, diagnosed hypertension was associated with slightly increased risk (HR 1.07, 1.00-1.15) while high blood pressure (≥140/90 mmHg) at the most recent measurement was associated with lower risk (HR 0.61, 0.56-0.67).
    [Show full text]
  • Oncology Data Landscape in Europe Data Sources & Initiatives
    EFPIA Oncology data landscape in Europe Data sources & initiatives Research Report July 2018 IQVIA, A.T. Kearney Disclaimer The following research has been conducted by A.T. Kearney and IQVIA, and does not constitute an EFPIA position on health data in oncology. www.efpia.eu 2 Executive summary This deliverable focuses on: 1) Characterisation of the current data landscape, and its strengths and weaknesses, providing a macro-view of European data sources grouped by archetypes 2) Characterisation of current European oncology initiatives looking at their aims and methods, unique approaches, as well as the barriers they face We have conducted a bottom-up assessment of the current data landscape using the IQVIA RWD catalogue to identify data source archetypes – Research databases [standalone / partnerships] – Facilitated networks – EMR -linked sources – Administration and claims sources – Large scale clinical registries Interviews were conducted with initiative experts to gain first-hand knowledge of both the initiatives themselves and the barriers they believe exist in the landscape Initiatives provide insights into “what good looks like” and how EFPIA Oncology might consider collaborating or replicating to help develop future interventions Source: A.T. Kearney; IQVIA www.efpia.eu 3 Contents Introduction Data sources Data initiatives Appendix www.efpia.eu 4 Introduction www.efpia.eu 5 The health data landscape is diverse with many data sources and some standout initiatives; all with varying abilities to tackle the use cases European
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019-20
    Annual Report 2019/20 Introduction Our vision: Our Services Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Luton Norfolk Peterborough Suffolk Improve the health and Our portfolio of services in 2019/20 were Adult services wellbeing of people across the provided from GP surgeries and health centres, community settings such as schools, children’s District nursing/ diverse communities we serve. community matrons centres and people’s own homes, as well as from the following main sites: Specialist nurses/long Our mission: • Bedfordshire: term conditions Kings Brook and the Child Development Neuro-rehabilitation Provide high quality care Centre in Bedford and a range of community through our excellent people. based facilities; Specialist services • Cambridgeshire: Community dental Our values Brookfields in Cambridge, Doddington services, Dental Access Oral health MOS only MOS only Hospital, Princess of Wales Hospital in Ely, Centres, and minor oral promotion North Cambridgeshire Hospital in Wisbech, surgery - MOS only Oaktree Centre and Hinchingbrooke Hospital in Huntingdon; Musculoskeletal services Honesty Ambition • Luton: Sexual health services Luton Treatment Centre, Redgrave Children and Young People’s Centre and a range of Children’s services community based facilities; Health visiting Empathy Respect • Norfolk: (see note) Breydon Clinic in Great Yarmouth, Oak Street Clinic in Norwich and Vancouver House in School nursing Kings Lynn and a range of community based (see note) facilities; Therapies • Peterborough: Our objectives Rivergate, Midgate and Kings
    [Show full text]
  • Draft – Work in Progress 0
    draft – work in progress 0 29 draft – work in progress Contents Foreword ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive summary ....................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 1: Who we are ............................................................................................................... 10 Our population ......................................................................................................................... 10 Our health and care system ..................................................................................................... 15 Our challenges and opportunities ............................................................................................ 17 Chapter 2: How we want services to change ............................................................................... 20 Changes to health, care and wider public services .................................................................. 20 How we will work together differently ....................................................................................... 23 Chapter 3: An ambitious programme of transformational change ................................................ 26 Choosing where to focus ......................................................................................................... 26 System priorities .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Impact Assessment (Economy, Environment, Social and Community Recovery)
    COMMUNITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND COMMUNITY RECOVERY) Stage Reviewer Consultation Version 1.0 (26 May) Emma Charter David Edwards Version 1.1 (1 June) David Edwards Emma Charter Version 1.2 Emma Charter Economy and (17 June) Environment Recovery Version 1.3 Emma Charter Joanne Lancaster (19 June) David Edwards Oliver Morley Version 2.0 Emma Charter Senior Leadership (22 June) Daniel Buckridge Team Claudia Deeth David Edwards Oliver Morley Introduction This impact assessment relates to the recovery of the Huntingdonshire district from the effects of Covid-19, focussing on the key areas of the local economy, our local environment, wider local community and social effects. The document will provide an assessment of the impact of the pandemic within our communities and incorporate information from our wider partners and agencies, as detailed in the Consultation Table. This assessment will use official/locally collected data to present a current baseline of how our people and our local businesses have been affected. Whilst this document addresses the economic, social and environmental impacts district wide, recovery action plans have been developed, relating to urban spaces/high streets located within our market towns, St Ives, Huntingdon, St Neots and Ramsey. Wider, knock on effects, such as public concerns around safety and associated behaviour, the potential for further spikes in the number of COVID-19 cases (and the response that will be required), the phasing out and conclusion of the furlough scheme, the latter likely to result in significant job losses have not been considered in detail but will be addressed as the plan progresses.
    [Show full text]