DOCSLIB.ORG

Whakatōhea 2020 Settlement Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Whakatōhea 2020 Settlement Information Whakatōhea 2020 Settlement Information Tēnā koutou whānau, Ngā mihi o te wā ki a koutou katoa. Nei ra te mihi, te tangi ki ngā mate kua rūpeke ki te ao wairua, ka rongo te pō, ka rongo te ao. Tātou te kanohi ora e whai nei i ngā tapuwae o rātou mā. Anei rā ngā kōrero o ngā marama tata nei mō te kaupapa o te whakataunga raupatu. Tēnā koutou katoa. Follow the WPCT Web and Introducing our ‘What’s my wai? Social Media sites now What's my Why?’ Campaign to get all the latest on The Trust is seeking Whakatōhea feedback into the reasons you want to support the #Whakatōhea2020 settlement. In order to do this we are profiling whānau members to share their desires, aspirations and needs as to why they are supporting the Settlement. #Whakatōhea2020 We feel this is the most honest way to showcase what the whānau’ collective thoughts are. The Whakatōhea Pre-Settlement Claims Through video and photos, kōrero mai, we want to know the following: Trust (WPCT) has been mandated by Whakatōhea to represent hapū and marae to negotiate a package to bring The Settlement is important back to the people to so that they can because it will create decide whether or not we will settle with Ko Teina Hudson ahau opportunities for our the Crown. Representation on the WPCT No Ngai Tamahaua ahau tamariki and mokopuna. is by hapū and marae, giving each rōpū Whats good for Whakatōhea their own unique voice. is good for Opotiki. The purpose of this document is to give our Whakatōhea whānau all the factual information we can to keep you up to date Your Representatives on our Settlement process. We have an Hapū and Marae Representatives were appointed in August 2019 Agreement in Principle which highlights following processes consistent with the WPCT Trust Deed. opportunities that Whakatōhea might want to take up to address the injustices The Hapū and Marae Representatives for the next three years are: that have happened to Whakatōhea. Dave Ngatai Audrey Renata Erin Moore Graeme Riesterer (Chair) Now we are looking to the future and Pare Mafi Tahu Taia Mana Pirihi Anau Apanui looking to develop a Deed of Settlement which will highlight how Whakatōhea Keita Hudson Muriwai Kahaki Bruce Pukepuke Linda Grave might want to organise ourselves. These Jason Kurei WMBT Representative is Robert Edwards are things like what the Post Settlement Entity looks like, how resources are The Whakatōhea Pre-Settlement Claims Trust and the Whakatōhea Māori Trust Board allocated and distributed. We need your are separate entities and have different responsibilities, however they have the same help to do this. So we need you to engage membership base. with us, follow our WPCT communication Whakatōhea Māori Trust Board record and manage the Iwi and hapū registrations threads, and tell us your feedback, ideas along with managing the current tribal assets and aspirations to help us shape our Deed of Settlement. We have hui-ā-rohe Whakatōhea Pre-Settlement Claims Trust (WPCT) is the entity mandated to negotiate organised for around the motu to engage with the Crown on the Whakatōhea Settlement. with you, our whānau. We want to know what your WHY is. Why do you support So for all updates and understanding on what is happening through this this Settlement? process, please ensure you are following the WPCT communications. #Whakatōhea2020 Agreement in Principle (AIP) On August 17th 2017, over The AIP includes a redress of $100 million including: 300 Whakatōhea whānau went on a hīkoi to Poneke to see and COMPREHENSIVE OFFER assist with the signing of the MANA WHENUA MANA MOANA MANA TANGATA Agreement in Principal (AIP). Transfer of sites totalling Up to 5,000 ha reserved Commitments from over 6,692 ha for aquaculture the Tertiary Education The AIP holds the promise of much development near Commission to work with opportunity for Whakatōhea – it will Chapter in the Bay of Opotiki Whakatōhea help equip our iwi to assert authority Plenty CMS covering 83,000 ha Marine and harbour Education Endowment and influence over and within our rohe in development fund that Fund a practical expression of mana whenua Cultural Materials Plan includes support for a and mana moana. In social terms help and Decision-Making resource application by Te Reo Revitalisation Fund generate jobs to ensure that our people Framework Whakatōhea Cultural Revitalisation can return home and prosper. RFR over Crown land in Fund Offer to make Ohiwa Whakatōhea rohe Harbour Implementation Return of key sites Reserve Land Forum permanent potentially suitable for Development Fund (subject to agreement cultural development (Opape & Hiwarau) of Forum) Relationship redress with Statutory government agencies and acknowledgements over Ministers certain waterways Reserve lands development fund $5,000,000 Cultural revitalisation fund $5,000,000 Te Reo revitalisation fund $1,000,000 Education endowment fund $2,000,000 Marine and harbour development fund $2,000,000 Quantum $85,000,000 TOTAL $ 100,000,000 Whānau we need you to have your say now. We would like to understand what your aspirations are for the future of Whakatōhea. The following key areas we’d like to know your thoughts: The Historical Account Post Settlement Governance Entity Place Name Changes You can get involved via our national Hui-ā-rohe, Te Roopu Awhina working groups, the WPCT website, WPCT facebook or Instagram pages. Have your say, kōrero mai! Settlement Journey so far 2020: We are here 1992 Treaty negotiations continue WAI87 submitted Continuing negotiations at the same time as having a Waitangi Tribunal 1994 Whakatōhea starts direct District Inquiry – a parallel process negotiations with the Crown The Crown and Whakatōhea negotiated an Agreement in Principle in 2017. The 1996 negotiations were put on hold during an iwi-wide voting process recommended by the Offer of $40m made to Waitangi Tribunal following its inquiry into the Trust’s mandate a Treaty settlement on Whakatōhea behalf of Whakatōhea. Whakatōhea spoke, and the 2018 vote again ratified that WPCT had majority support to continue negotiations. 1998 Offer withdrawn and The vote also demonstrated significant support for a Waitangi Tribunal hearing. WPCT negotiations cease strongly advocated for a parallel process to ensure all the aspirations of Whakatōhea 2007 whānau were being met. The Crown recognised the unique context and has confirmed that a Whakatōhea Settlement will not impact on the continuation of our Waitangi Tribunal Te Ara Tono developed by Whakatōhea Raupatu Working District Inquiry. This is the first time the Crown has agreed to this type of parallel process. Party Waitangi Tribunal District Inquiry 2015 The Whakatōhea Waitangi Tribunal District Inquiry, otherwise known as North-Eastern Tu Ake Whakatōhea Collective Bay of Plenty district inquiry, relates to the southern portion of the north-eastern develop Whakatōhea Mandate Bay of Plenty area where the Tribunal has not previously held a district inquiry. Strategy 2016: Whakatōhea vote accepts mandate strategy and While Whakatōhea historical claims would be a key focus of the Inquiry, this broader WPCT established North-Eastern Bay of Plenty district inquiry would also hear Whakatōhea claimants’ contemporary grievances, and the claims of any claimants within the inquiry district not 2017 affiliated to Whakatōhea who wish to bring them before the Tribunal. WPCT engage in direct negotiations with the Crown AUGUST: Agreement in Principle WAITANGI TRIBUNAL CROWN NEGOTIATIONS signed Waitangi Tribunal Mandate Inquiry held Advanced for Whakatōhea by claimants Advanced for Whakatōhea by WPCT 2018 Waitangi Tribunal finds Crown breach and suggests vote to check support for continuing Funded by Legal Aid Funded by the Crown with settlement process Vote completed, and results show majority support for Iwi participation via claimants Iwi participation via voting selection of continuing the Settlement, representatives, hui-ā-rohe, hapū hui, strong support for the Waitangi Roopu awhina, WPCT office Tribunal Inquiry, and minimal support for remandating 2019 Hearings completed (date unknown). Deed of Settlement potentially ratified JUNE: Waitangi Tribunal District Reports completed (date unknown). in 2020. Legislation passed in 2021. Inquiry approved SEPTEMBER: Minister of Treaty Negotiations approves Outcome will be a comprehensive Outcome will be a comprehensive for settlement negotiations to Tribunal report into Whakatōhea claims settlement of Whakatōhea claims, continue in parallel with District creation of a new Whakatōhea Inquiry Post Settlement Governance Entity. 2020 WE ARE HERE: Next step: Turn the report into stories Next step: Build a future for our and looking for whānau input our people can easily engage with tamariki and mokopuna into the Deed of Settlement. #Whakatōhea2020 Ensure you are eligible to VOTE #Whakatōhea2020 Anybody of Whakatōhea descent over the age of 18 is eligible to vote, whether you appear on the register or not. To ensure your voice is heard, make sure you register now. To stay informed, email: [email protected] to be added to the communications list. You can register with the Whakatōhea Māori Trust Board (WMTB) or there is a link to the registration page on the WPCT website. Hui-ā-Iwi & Hui-ā-Rohe Schedule Hui-ā-Rohe Whakatane Hui-ā-Rohe Rotorua Hui-ā-Rohe Tauranga Tuesday 11th February 2020 Wednesday 12th February 2020 Thursday 13th February 2020 War Memorial Hall Taharangi Marae Club Mount Maunganui – Reception Lounge 26 Tarewa Road, Ohinemutu, 45 Kawaka Street, Mount Maunganui
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NZCA 680 BETWEEN NGĀTI TE ATA Appellant
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA547/2017 [2019] NZCA 680 BETWEEN NGĀTI TE ATA Appellant AND MINISTER FOR TREATY OF WAITANGI NEGOTIATIONS First Respondent HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Second Respondent NGĀTI TAMAOHO SETTLEMENT TRUST Third Respondent REGISTRAR-GENERAL OF LAND Fourth Respondent Hearing: 27 August 2019 (further submissions received 22 October 2019) Court: Clifford, Courtney and Wild JJ Counsel: J P Kahukiwa for Appellant S M Kinsler and T R Simpson for First and Second Respondents T T Kapea for Third Respondent No appearance for Fourth Respondent Judgment: 19 December 2019 at 4 pm JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A The appeal is dismissed. B The appellant is to pay one set of costs to the first and second respondents for a standard appeal on a band A basis and usual disbursements. ____________________________________________________________________ NGĀTI TE ATA v MINISTER FOR TREATY OF WAITANGI NEGOTIATIONS [2019] NZCA 680 [19 December 2019] REASONS OF THE COURT (Given by Clifford J) Introduction [1] For some years now, the Crown has been in the process of endeavouring to settle the historical Treaty claims of the iwi of Tāmaki Makaurau. That process has been controversial. In particular, a 2006 agreement in principle between the Crown and Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei was seen by other iwi as inimical to their interests and contrary to the Crown’s Treaty obligations to them. As part of resolving that controversy the Crown entered into a settlement deed with the group of iwi known as the Ngā Mana Whenua o Tāmaki Makaurau collective (the Collective).
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Values and Uses of the Tukituki Catchment
    Te Manaaki Taiao; Te Taiwhenua o Heretaunga Cultural Values and Uses of the Tukituki Catchment Final Report May 2012 Prepared for the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council 5/16/2012 Cultural Values and Uses of the Tukituki River Catchment by Heretaunga Marae/Hapu; Cultural Impact Assessment of the Ruataniwha Water Storage and Makaroro Dam Site Projects on Heretaunga Marae/Hapu Cultural Values and Uses. INDEX MIHI 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................... Page 3 2 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... Page 5 2.1 LOWER TUKITUKI RIVER: HERETAUNGA MARAE/ HAPŪ What, Why, Who, When 3 METHODOLOGY .................................................................... Page 6 3.1 CONSULTATION GUIDELINES Consultation Parameters Participants Report Constraints Report Scope Report Timeframe Results Format Context 4 RESULTS .................................................................................... Page 9 4.1 HERETAUNGA ARARAU ......................................................... Page 9 4.1.1 WHAKAPAPA 4.1.2 MARAE/ HAPŪ FEEDBACK – WHAKAPAPA 4.2 HERETAUNGA HAUKUNUI ..................................................... Page16 4.2.1 WAI-AWA 4.2.2 MARAE/ HAPŪ FEEDBACK - WAI-AWA 4.2.3 MAURI ............................................................................ Page 21 4.2.4 MARAE/ HAPŪ FEEDBACK – MAURI 4.2.5 WĀHI TAPU ............................................................................ Page 25 4.2.6 MARAE/ HAPŪ FEEDBACK - WĀHI TAPU 4.3 TE HAARO O TE KAAHU ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Waikato-Tainui Settlement Act: a New High-Water Mark for Natural Resources Co-Management
    Notes & Comments The Waikato-Tainui Settlement Act: A New High-Water Mark for Natural Resources Co-management Jeremy Baker “[I]f we care for the River, the River will continue to sustain the people.” —The Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 165 II. THE EMERGENCE OF ADAPTIVE CO-MANAGEMENT ......................... 166 A. Co-management .................................................................... 166 B. Adaptive Management .......................................................... 168 C. Fusion: Adaptive Co-management ....................................... 169 D. Some Criticisms and Challenges Associated with Adaptive Co-management .................................................... 170 III. NEW ZEALAND’S WAIKATO-TAINUI SETTLEMENT ACT 2010—HISTORY AND BACKGROUND ...................................... 174 A. Maori Worldview and Environmental Ethics ....................... 175 B. British Colonization of Aotearoa New Zealand and Maori Interests in Natural Resources ............................ 176 C. The Waikato River and Its People ........................................ 182 D. The Waikato River Settlement Act 2010 .............................. 185 Jeremy Baker is a 2013 J.D. candidate at the University of Colorado Law School. 164 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y [Vol. 24:1 IV. THE WAIKATO-TAINUI SETTLEMENT ACT AS ADAPTIVE CO-MANAGEMENT ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Supplementary
    1 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS FOR: 2 3 CASCADING IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE ON 4 INDIGENOUS CULTURE 5 6 Yletyinen, J., Tylianakis, J.M., Stone, C., Lyver, P.O.B. 7 8 9 10 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS TABLE OF CONTENTS: 11 12 Table S1: Description of values 13 Table S2: Most frequent values and ecosystem elements in the interview coding 14 Table S3: Node degrees in the comprehensive social-ecological value system 15 Table S4: Sensitivity of values and biophysical elements to link weight thresholds 16 17 Figure S1: Ego networks for ecosystem elements with path length two 18 Figure S2: Mean path length distribution of 1000 randomized two-mode networks 19 20 1 21 Table S1. Value descriptions. Key primary and secondary values with descriptions applied to transcripts of interviews with Ngātiwai kaumātua 22 (elders), kaitiaki (environmental guardians) and representatives, Northland, New Zealand. This study examines the secondary values, which have 23 a finer resolution. Primary value set revised from 1 and 2. 24 1° values Abbreviations 2° Values Value descriptions for 2° Values 1. Connection PTA PEOPLE TO ANCESTORS • Whakapapa (genealogy) integral to relationship with ancestors and identity • Whakapapa connects individuals with their ancestors and defines their obligations and relationships to the wider family group and their localized species and environment • Waahi tapu (sacred) sites such as burial grounds known and protected by Ngātiwai • Occupation on the land and sea links the individual with ancestors PTP PEOPLE TO PEOPLE • Whakapapa and strengthening of relationships between whānau (family) and whānaunga (extended family) • Relationships and connections between whānau, hapū (sub- tribe) and Iwi (tribe) • Building community spirit and sense of togetherness • Islands facilitate the whānaungatanga (inter-relatedness) of whānau and community • Open and respectful communications • Ngātiwai networking with other Iwi • Ngātiwai networking with the Crown (NZ government) • Ngātiwai networking with non-government organisations (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Be(Com)Ing' Ngāti Kahungunu in the Diaspora: Iwi Identity and Social
    ‘Be(com)ing’ Ngāti Kahungunu in the Diaspora: Iwi Identity and Social Organisation in Wellington Christina M. González A thesis submitted in fulfilment of a Master of Arts (MA) in Māori Studies Victoria University of Wellington Te Whare Wānanga o te Upoko o te Ika a Māui 2010 Abstract Ngāti Kahungunu is an ideal example to investigate the processes of identity management and socio-political representation within and outside of their traditional tribal territory. It is the third most populous iwi in Aotearoa/New Zealand, with approximately 60,000 members, and boundaries that span from the Wairoa district down to the Wairarapa region. Kahungunu’s complexity and dynamism are not restricted to its territorial boundaries. A large portion of Kahungunu members form expatriate tribal communities located beyond their tribal district. The Wellington region hosts the largest number of Kahungunu members dwelling outside of their tribal territory, as well as the Ngāti Kahungunu Embassy. The Embassy is an organisation which, like many other expatriate Māori tribal bodies, faces the challenges of locating and reaching its tribal members to connect them to their Kahungunu home and heritage, while simultaneously representing their particular, Wellington-specific voices. This thesis explores the ways that Ngāti Kahungunu identities are articulated, maintained and transformed by individuals and institutions in Wellington today, by analysing qualitative interviews with ten Kahungunu men and women, and a case study on the Kahungunu Embassy. Three chapters on iwi identity, home and social organisation illustrate how Kahungunu voices in Wellington can more adequately be heard, and their experiences included, in the tribe, despite their apparent geographic and cultural distance.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Whanganui a Tara Customary Tenure, 1750–1850
    Te Whanganui-a-Tara Customary Tenure 1750-1850 Penny Ehrhardt ( Te Whanganui-a-Tara Customary Tenure 1750-1850 Penny Ehrhardt A Report Commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal December 1992 Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice Wellington Contents Introduction .................................................. 3 1: Literature Survey 1.1 Primary Sources ............................................ 4 1.2 Secoundary Sources ......................................... 5 2: Historical Narrative 2.1 Te Whanganui-a-Tara (Wellington) before 1820 .................. 11 2.1.1 Te Whanganui-a-Tara before Ngati Ira move into the district 11 2.1.2 Ngati Ira ........................................... 10 2.1.3 Two Northern Taua .................................. 12 2.2 Migration of Kawhia and Taranaki tribes to Kapiti ............... 14 2.2.1 Te Rauparaha's decision to migrate south ................ 14 2.2.2 Te Ati Awa join the heke .............................. 15 2.2.3 Response of the Southern Tribes ........................ 16 2.2.4 Waiorua ........................................... 17 2.2.5 Further Heke to the Kapiti Coast ....................... 19 2.3 The Changing Occupation of Te Whanganui-a-Tara .............. 19 2.3.1 Ngati Tama and Ngati Mutunga move to the region ........ 19 2.3.2 Origins of Ngamotu's claims in Te Whanganui-a-Tara ...... 22 2.3.3 Haowhenua ......................................... 23 2.3.4 Ngati Mutunga leave Te Whanganui-a-Tara .............. 24 2.3.5 Ngati Mutunga's gift ................................. 25 2.3.6 Interests in Te Whanganui-a-Tara between Ngati Mutunga's departure and the arrival of the Tory ........................ 26 2.4 Pakeha involvement in Te Whanganui-Tara ..................... 28 2.4.1 Land made tapu for the Wesleyan Mission ................ 28 2.4.2 New Zealand Company "purchase" ..................... 29 2.4.3 Maori Perceptions of the "sale" ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 3: Explanation to Go with Hard
    Appendix N: Kaitiaki Plan The Kaitiaki Plan with Ngati Te Ata dated 1 March 2011 is appended to this Agreement in accordance with Designation condition 123. Its attachment to this Agreement does not impose contractual obligations on either party and is not intended to alter either party’s rights or obligations under this Agreement. DOC REF 14063992_8 Kaitiaki Plan 16 Kaitiaki Plan Whatungarongaro te tangata, toitu te whenua People come and go, the land remains For the Purpose of the PPP Prison Project at Wiri Ngāti Te Ata 1 March 2011 1 Contents 1. Purpose of the Kaitiaki Plan .............................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Mana whenua and the Wiri site .............................................................................................. 4 1.2 Why a Kaitiaki Plan? ............................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Relationship between this Kaitiaki Plan and the Land Designation (RMA) process ................... 5 2. What's important to us ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Meaningful relationships ......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Kaitiakitanga outcomes ........................................................................................................... 6 3. Protocols and assumptions guiding engagement .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iwi Population Spatial Distribution Summary Māori
    NIDEA Brief No. 5 IWI POPULATION SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION September 2015 How do patterns of iwi identification vary by Table 6: Number & distribution of iwi identified and ‘don’t know iwi’ region? In 1996 and in 2013 the largest number populations by Regional Council, 1996 & 2013 of Ma ori descendants reporting at least one iwi Regional Council (RC) Iwi identified population Don't know iwi (%) of lived in Auckland, followed by Waikato, and the Māori Descent1 within RC Bay of Plenty. This is to be expected, given that 1996 2013 1996 2013 Northland Region 34,386 40,287 17.8 13.6 TE AO HURIHURI these regions also have the largest Ma ori Auckland Region 101,361 129,552 22.5 18.4 IWI IDENTIFICATION I N THE CENSUS populations. What about the regional distribution Waikato Region 58,980 73,338 19.5 17.1 of Ma ori who do not know their iwi? Table 6 Bay of Plenty Region 54,018 62,994 14.3 12.2 Gisborne Region 17,250 18,009 9.7 8.1 Tahu Kukutai and Moana Rarere shows that there is tremendous regional Hawke's Bay Region 25,575 29,967 18.8 15.5 variation. In 2013, only 8 per cent of Ma ori living Taranaki Region 11,307 14,919 28.1 23.6 Inside this issue: in the Gisborne region did not know their iwi, Manawatu-Wanganui Region 30,984 36,933 23.8 18.8 Wellington Region 40,872 53,277 19.9 15.9 MĀORI IDENTITY CATEGORIES Māori identity 2 compared to nearly one quarter of Ma ori in the Tasman Region 2,007 3,195 30.6 23.2 categories West Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Tā Te Tumuhere O Te Rūnanga-Ā-Iwi O Ngāpuhi
    TĀ TE TUMUHERE O TE RŪNANGA-Ā-IWI O NGĀPUHI CEO’s Report Takiwā Te Rōpū Kaumātua Kuia o Te Whare Te Rūnanga ā Iwi o Ngāpuhi Tapu o Ngāpuhi Te Hau Ora Ō Ngāpuhi Ngāpuhi Iwi Social Services Ngāpuhi Asset Holding (THOON) (NISS) Company Ltd (NAHC) 18 Lorraine Toki Tumuhere – CEO E te Iwi nui tonu o Ngāpuhi, tēnā koutou kātoa. I am proud to stand here before you and present this year’s Annual Report – the year in review. I am especially proud of the way our kaimahi have responded to the challenges we face. We have commenced a journey of change. The steps taken so far have gone some way to resetting our priorities and restoring confidence in our Ngāpuhi whānau. Put simply, our task now is to build on this and nourish these small gains. We need to continue to listen to our Ngāpuhi whānau while at the same time be realistic about what it is we can do and recognise our limitations. With our reach, our footprint, our skills and capabilities, we will be perfectly placed to lead. When I look at our business, I see opportunities. My overriding message is to keep it simple. Too often we complicate things and lose focus on why we are here. CONFRONTING ISSUES IDENTIFYING ISSUES THROUGH A As we embark on this journey of change, we recognise the STRUCTURED PROCESS responsibility and opportunity that comes with the choices we In order to understand and prioritise the issues that matter make. Doing the right thing for Ngāpuhi in a way that supports to our Ngāpuhi whānau and our business the first step is communities and the environment will be crucial to our future considering the following: success.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ngātiwai Mandate Inquiry Report
    Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz T H E N G Ā T I W A I M A N D A T E I N Q U I R Y R E P O R T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t h e N g ā t i w a i M a n d a t e I n q u i r y R e p o r t W A I 2 5 6 1 W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 7 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz The cover design by Cliff Whiting invokes the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi and the consequent interwoven development of Māori and Pākehā history in New Zealand as it continuously unfolds in a pattern not yet completely known National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the National Library of New Zealand ISBN 978-1-86956-327-1 (pbk) ISBN 978-1-86956-328-8 (PDF) www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Typeset by the Waitangi Tribunal Published 2017 by Legislation Direct, Lower Hutt, New Zealand Printed by Printlink, Lower Hutt, New Zealand 21 20 19 18 17 5 4 3 2 1 Set in Adobe Minion Pro and Cronos Pro Opticals Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz HE MIHI KI A TE RANGI KARAITIANA MCGARVEY Tātai whetū ki te rangi, mau tonu, mau tonu Tātai tangata ki te whenua, ngaro noa, ngaro noa Te Tama a Tūhoe Pōtiki, te tama a Ngāti Whakaue Kua ngaro rā koe ki te pū o mahara Kua wahangū te reo whakapākehā
    [Show full text]
  • Muriwhenua Land Report
    MURIWHENUA LAND REPORT WAITANGI TRIBUNAL REPORT 1997 MU RIWHENUA LAND REPORT MURIWHENUA LAND REPORT W A I 45 WAITANGI TRIBUNAL REPORT 1997 G P PUBLICATIONS The cover design by Cliff Whiting invokes the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi and the consequent interwoven development of Maori and Pakeha history in New Zealand as it continuously unfolds in a pattern not yet completely known A Waitangi Tribunal Report is b n 1-86956-202-x © Crown copyright 1997 Produced by the Waitangi Tribunal Published by GP Publications, Wellington, New Zealand Printed by GP Print, Wellington, New Zealand Set in Times Roman LIST OF CONTENTS Letter of transmittal........................................................................................................ xvii Preface...............................................................................................................................xix Chapter 1: O verview .........................................................................................................1 A summary of the claim and findings Chapter 2: The People and the L a n d ......................................................................... 11 On the nature of the Maori social system and law which conditioned the Maori view of the first land transactions; This law is directed not to property but to relationships between people; Maori and Europeans on first contact 2.1 Initial issues - conflicting laws and contractual mutuality..................................11 2.2 Original occupation.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Whakatōheaōhea PRE-SETTLEMENT CLAIMS TRUST Pre-Settlement Claims Trust Mandate Strategy 201 4 MANDATE STRATEGY
    WHAKATWhakatŌHEAōhea PRE-SETTLEMENT CLAIMS TRUST Pre-Settlement Claims Trust Mandate Strategy 201 4 MANDATE STRATEGY April 2016 1 | Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The Tū Ake Whakatōhea Collective with the support of the Whakatōhea Maori Trust Board have prepared this comprehensive draft Mandate Strategy and Trust Deed for the proposed Whakatōhea Pre-Settlement Claims Trust to progress treaty negotiations for Te Whakatōhea. This is an acknowledgement to ngā uri, kaumātua, whanau, and hapū who have contributed to the development of these documents to benefit ngā uri katoa o Te Whakatōhea. Contact Name Address Contact Details Graeme Riesterer 122 St John Street, Ōpōtiki E: [email protected] Chairperson Tū Ake Whakatōhea PO Box 207, Ōpōtiki M: (027) 6869362 Collective 2 | Page TABLE OF CONTENTS WHAKATŪWHERA ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 A FRESH APPROACH ......................................................................................................... 7 1.3 TE ARA TONO MO TE RAUPATU ........................................................................................ 7 2 TE KAUPAPA .......................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 THE PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]