Washington County, Maryland Solid Waste

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Washington County, Maryland Solid Waste WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT & RECYCLING PLAN 2022-2031 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 BACKGROUND 2 CHAPTER 1: COUNTY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS 4 I. CHAPTER OVERVIEW 5 II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ESTABLISHED BY THIS PLAN 5 iii. CONFORMANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE AND REGIONAL PLANS 8 IV. COUNTY GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE IN RELATION TO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 9 V. AGENCIES, LAWS AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING SOLID WASTE 11 CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF COUNTY POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT CHARACTERISTICS, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING REGULATIONS, MUNICIPALITIES, AND FEDERAL FACILITIES 17 I. CHAPTER OVERVIEW 18 II. INTRODUCTION 18 III. MUNICIPALITIES 19 IV. FEDERAL FACILITIES 19 V. PROJECTIONS 21 VI. EMPLOYMENT 21 VII. CURRENT STATUS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 23 VIII. WASHINGTON COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE 25 CHAPTER 3: EXISTING SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 26 i. EXISTING SOLID WASTE GENERATION IN WASHINGTON COUNTY OVERVIEW 27 II. CURRENT WASTE GENERATION SNAPSHOT 28 III. EXISTING SOLID WASTE GENERATION BY CATEGORY 31 IV. WASTE IMPORTED AND EXPORTED 37 V. REFUSE COLLECTION SYSTEMS IN WASHINGTON COUNTY 38 VI. EXISTING SOLID WASTE REFUSE FACILITIES 39 VII. WASTE STREAM PROJECTIONS 46 CHAPTER 4: SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT AND ALTERNATIVES 47 I. ASSESSMENT OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES 48 II. WASTE REDUCTION 49 III. LAND DISPOSAL 54 IV. SOURCE SEPARATION/RECYCLING 59 V. WASTE UTILIZATION AND ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES 65 CHAPTER 5: SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RECYCLING PLAN OF ACTION 80 i. INTRODUCTION 81 APPENDICES 101 Washington County, MD Solid Waste Management & Recycling Plan I. INTRODUCTION A. Plan Purpose and Organization The purpose of this document is to outline Washington County’s existing and future plans for solid waste management in compliance with State and Federal regulations. This document, and the public outreach that preceded its adoption, also serve as a link to inform local citizens about the County’s plans for an essential public service. Current State regulations (COMAR 26.03.03) require local governments to prepare plans that address solid waste management for a ten-year period. Solid waste management plans must also be reviewed and updated every three years. The current Washington County Solid Waste Management Plan, which covers the period of 2022-2031, was adopted by the County on ____________ and approved by the Maryland Department of the Environment on ____________. The Plan is divided into five chapters in accordance with the COMAR requirements noted above. The first chapter presents the Federal, State and local legal and institutional framework that governs solid waste management in Washington County and establishes the County’s goals and objectives for this type of land use. Chapter 2 presents an overview of the demographic trends which affect the County’s waste generation, summarizes zoning regulations pertaining to solid waste facilities and describes the intent of the County’s current Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 3 describes the current solid waste management system operating in the County and presents data on solid waste trends and projections. Chapter 4 contains an assessment of the current solid waste management system and evaluates the need for and feasibility of alternatives to current collection, processing and disposal technologies. Chapter 5 presents an actionable plan for addressing solid waste during the ten-year period based upon the system evaluation in Chapter 4, including a schedule for implementation. B. Plan Approval Process Plan preparation was performed by the Department of Planning and Zoning in consultation with the Department of Solid Waste and Recycling. Input was also gained from the Washington County Environmental Management Advisory Committee and a copy of the plan was routed to several outside agencies including the Health Department for their review and comment. A draft version of the Plan was also submitted to the Maryland Department of Environment (MDE) for a preliminary review. Opportunities for public comment on the plan were offered through a variety of methods, including a public hearing held on ____ in accordance with Section 9-503 of the Annotated Code of Maryland’s Environment Article. The public hearing was advertised in a newspaper of general circulation at least 14 days prior to the hearing. Notice of the hearing was also posted on the County’s website with a link to the proposed plan. Revisions were made to the document in response to feedback from all the above entities. C. Statement of Certification This Plan is certified to have been prepared in accordance with COMAR 26.03.03. 1 Washington County, MD Solid Waste Management & Recycling Plan D. Summary of Major Plan Updates This Plan has been updated in numerous respects since the last major update to the Solid Waste and Recycling Plan occurred in 2014, aside from those amendments which have been made since 2014 in the aftermath of new State Legislation. Principally, goals, objectives and action items have been oriented to and organized according to the Solid Waste Management Hierarchy that includes methods of waste treatment ranging from source reduction to waste disposal. In addition, there is a greater range of potential waste management solutions discussed and proposed for further study and/or implementation within Chapter 4 and Chapter 5. The 2011 Plan and 2014 updates were heavily oriented to the waste-to-energy facility that Washington County was jointly pursuing at the time with Frederick and Carroll Counties. That project ultimately did not come to fruition, which negatively affected many of the stated intentions imbedded within the prior Plan. Accordingly, this Plan provides a more open-ended list of options, many of which have been given recent extensive study by the County’s Environmental Management Advisory Committee, within Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 that may be pursued by the County if promising opportunities arise to do so. The intent in doing so is to provide greater flexibility, both within scope of study undertaken within this Plan, and in its actual implementation under the constraints imposed by fiscal realities, changing material markets and many other factors. II. BACKGROUND Solid waste, as defined in Section 9-101 of the Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, refers to “any garbage, refuse, sludge, or liquid from industrial, commercial, mining, or agricultural operations or from community activities.” Solid waste management describes an integrated system of activities which provide for the collection, source separation, storage, transportation, transfer, processing, treatment, re-use, or disposal of solid waste. The timely, cost-efficient and environmentally sound provision of these services by public and private solid waste management entities is an outgrowth of long-range planning to meet this essential community need. Washington County first developed its solid waste plan in 1979. Updates have occurred several times in the years since the original plan was written, most recently to comply with SB 370, passed by the State Legislature in 2019, concerning recycling in office buildings. Due to a range of factors, solid waste management has become increasingly complex since the first Federal legislation to address the issue was passed in 1965. Environmental regulations at the Federal and State level have become stricter over the succeeding decades as measures to protect public health have broadened to include mitigating the impacts of an increasing range of pollutant or waste types. Citizen opposition to the siting of traditional solid waste disposal facilities, such as landfills, has grown due to concerns over impacts to neighboring communities and natural resources. Industry changes to the collection, processing and disposal of solid waste have also led to increasing volumes being exported to regional waste management facilities. These facilities are often operated by private entities that are subject to less stringent regulations and offer highly competitive rates for services that compete with those provided by public entities. While local governments wrestle with such challenges, the volume of solid waste continues to grow proportionally in response to population growth, economic trends, technological innovation and improvements to standards of living that result in greater material consumption. 2 Washington County, MD Solid Waste Management & Recycling Plan Under those circumstances, the need to look beyond solid waste management practices which have previously met our needs for generations, has led local jurisdictions to look at alternative methods by which to deal with solid waste. To that end, it’s useful to understand that waste management constitutes a hierarchy of strategies by which to deal with solid waste. Most people are familiar with the simplified version of this hierarchy, which progresses from reduce, to reuse to recycle. This hierarchy is expanded upon in the figure below from the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As is evident from this image, the disposal of solid waste in a facility such as a landfill represents an, often necessary, but much less preferred technique for dealing with waste products. If feasible, more preferred techniques should be pursued such as source reduction in manufacturing processes, product reuse, recycling waste into raw materials that can be remanufactured into new products and the recovery of energy from non-recyclable material through various waste-to-energy processes. These
Recommended publications
  • December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 33 (2003) Repository 12-20-2003 December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396)" (2003). Volume 33 (2003). 51. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003/51 This December is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 33 (2003) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 33 Number 51 Saturday, December 20, 2003 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 6197—6396 Agencies in this issue: The Governor The Courts Department of Aging Department of Agriculture Department of Banking Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Revenue Fish and Boat Commission Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Public School Employees’ Retirement Board State Board of Education State Board of Nursing State Employee’s Retirement Board State Police Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 349, December 2003 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents).
    [Show full text]
  • York County Natural Areas Inventory
    YORK COUNTY NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY A COMPONENT OF THE YORK COUNTY COMPREHENSIVEPLAN YORK COUNTY NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY York County Planning Commission www.ycpc.org September, 1997 Amended - October 27, 2004 The original Natural Areas Inventory was funded in part by a Keystone, Park and Conservation Fund Program Grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources and a Community Development Block Grant from York County. PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Preface ..................................................................... iii Chapter I - Introduction ..........................................................1 Uses For The York County NAI .............................................3 Chapter II - Natural History Overview of The County ....................................5 Physiography and Geology ..................................................5 Soils ..................................................................6 Vegetation ..............................................................8 Disturbance ............................................................11 Chapter III - Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory Data System ........................13 Natural Areas Inventory Methods ............................................14 Information Gathering .....................................................14 Map and Air Photo Interpretation ............................................14 Field Work ............................................................15 Data Analysis ...........................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Explore South Mountain Recreation Area and Fort Frederick
    SOUTH MOUNTAIN RECREATION AREA Explore2021 FORT FREDERICK STATE PARK COMPLEXand Unofficial Guide to State Park Facilities and Programs Fun! Familyon county epic own & washingt In hagerst Visit our 8 State Parks for Family Fun, Living History, Wildlife and More! #MasksUpMaryland / #RecreateResponsibly 301-791-3246 VISITHAGERSTOWN.COM Voted Maryland Gin Distillery of the Year & Best Frederick Wedding Venue Award Winning Wines Tasty Food Menu Overnight Luxurious Indoor Accommodations Event For Seating 300 Guests Maryland’ s Largest Farm & Home Lavender Lavender of Maryland Festival Farm Whiskey We Craft Beer On Tap Distilled Spirits Farm To Glass Live Music & Events HM-944718-1 EXPLORE 2021 SOUTH MOUNTAIN RECREATION AREA AND FORT FREDERICK STATE PARK COMPLEX | 3 The South Mountain Recreation Area is open for adventure year-round. Climb, swing,and ZIP through the trees on 14 different courses with 7difficulty levels. DO YOU W KNO ?.. FaFymilyy LEDO StStyleyle DDinning Cut out or bring in for Fun For the Entire Family $ $25.00 • Hagerstown’s only paint your 3off purchase own pottery/ceramics studio! OR FoxshirFoxshire PlazaPlaza $ $30.00 • No appointment necessary! 5off purchase cannot be combined with other • Girls Night Out! discounts/promos Foxshire Plaza Experience Private Banquet 1423 Dual Hwy., 1201 E Dual Highway, Hagerstown, MD 21740 • 301-797-3100 the Room for Groups Hagerstown, MD See website for hours • www.potterybyme.net Difference HM-946568-1 301-766-4900 4 | EXPLORE 2021 SOUTH MOUNTAIN RECREATION AREA AND FORT FREDERICK STATE PARK COMPLEX South Mountain Recreation Area Welcome to Maryland State Parks! 21843 National Pike, Boonsboro, MD South Mountain Recreation Area 301-791-4767 Interim Park Manager Mark Spurrier With five state parks in the midst of a 13,000-acre forest, the South Mountain Recreation Area is open for adventure year-round! Featuring boating, swimming, fishing, hiking, mountain Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Areas Inventory of Bradford County, Pennsylvania 2005
    A NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF BRADFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 2005 Submitted to: Bradford County Office of Community Planning and Grants Bradford County Planning Commission North Towanda Annex No. 1 RR1 Box 179A Towanda, PA 18848 Prepared by: Pennsylvania Science Office The Nature Conservancy 208 Airport Drive Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 This project was funded in part by a state grant from the DCNR Wild Resource Conservation Program. Additional support was provided by the Department of Community & Economic Development and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through State Wildlife Grants program grant T-2, administered through the Pennsylvania Game Commission and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission. ii Site Index by Township SOUTH CREEK # 1 # LITCHFIELD RIDGEBURY 4 WINDHAM # 3 # 7 8 # WELLS ATHENS # 6 WARREN # # 2 # 5 9 10 # # 15 13 11 # 17 SHESHEQUIN # COLUMBIA # # 16 ROME OR WELL SMITHFI ELD ULSTER # SPRINGFIELD 12 # PIKE 19 18 14 # 29 # # 20 WYSOX 30 WEST NORTH # # 21 27 STANDING BURLINGTON BURLINGTON TOWANDA # # 22 TROY STONE # 25 28 STEVENS # ARMENIA HERRICK # 24 # # TOWANDA 34 26 # 31 # GRANVI LLE 48 # # ASYLUM 33 FRANKLIN 35 # 32 55 # # 56 MONROE WYALUSING 23 57 53 TUSCARORA 61 59 58 # LEROY # 37 # # # # 43 36 71 66 # # # # # # # # # 44 67 54 49 # # 52 # # # # 60 62 CANTON OVERTON 39 69 # # # 42 TERRY # # # # 68 41 40 72 63 # ALBANY 47 # # # 45 # 50 46 WILMOT 70 65 # 64 # 51 Site Index by USGS Quadrangle # 1 # 4 GILLETT # 3 # LITCHFIELD 8 # MILLERTON 7 BENTLEY CREEK # 6 # FRIENDSVILLE # 2 SAYRE # WINDHAM 5 LITTLE MEADOWS 9
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH 29 2007 Frederick County Mills ACCOMMODATION FACTORY
    MARCH 29 2007 Frederick County Mills ACCOMMODATION FACTORY ( ) David Foute advertised wool carding at Accommodation Factory, Dumb Quarter extended, Frederick-Town Herald, June 23, 1827. ADAMS FULLING MILL (9) Frederick Brown advertised wool carding at 6-1/4 cents per pound at the old establishment of Mr. Adams, about 2 miles south of New Market, Frederick-Town Herald, May 11, 1831, p. 4. He had offered fulling and dyeing there (Mrs. Adams’), Ibid., August 20, 1825. This was presumably the fulling mill shown on the 1808 Charles Varlé map on Bush Creek, 0.33 mile north of the present Weller Road, SE of Monrovia. The 1860 Bond map showed the Mrs. H. Norris wool factory, while the 1878 atlas showed Mrs. Norris with a grist and sawmill. ADLER ROPEWALK (F) A ropewalk operated by John Adler in 1819 was on South Market Street, Frederick. The building was occupied in 1976 by Federated Charities (See, Ralph F. Martz, “Richard Potts,” Frederick Post, May 11, 1976, p. A-7). ADELSPERGER MILL CO (5) This steam foundry and machine shop was listed in the 1860 census of manufactures with $14,000 capital investment and 25 employees; annual output was $5000 in castings and $25,000 in machinery. ADLUM STILL ( ) John Adlum advertised to sell two stills, 106-gallon and 49-gallon, Frederick-Town Herald, August 14, 1802. AETNA GLASS WORKS (7) Thomas Johnson purchased some of Amelung’s machinery and built a new Aetna Glass Works on Bush Creek, hauling sand from Ellicott City in empty wheat wagons. He later built another works on Tuscarora Creek, The Potomac, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Panther Press the Digital Newspaper
    Tuesday, Issue June 14th, 8 2021 Panther Press The Digital Newspaper Don’t Squish! Rethink! - Protesting the Killing of Bugs ------------ Momina Khuram Have you ever killed a bug? Everyone probably has done this, but today I am objecting to killing bugs. “Why?” you may ask. Imagine all the bugs in the world disappeared. There would be no more adventure. No chirping birds. No buzzing bees. It would be sad, boring, and silent outside. There are so many species of bugs in the world. Each one is unique in its skills. The more we learn about bugs the more we learn about our earth. Just like humans and other animals, bugs deserve a life too. I believe you should never kill bugs. I believe that you should not kill insects when they are outside. Bugs belong outside. They have families or colonies in which they are a vital part. You do not want to destroy these systems by taking out one of the workers. Picture caption: Periodical cicada (Magicicada sp.). Photo: Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources - Forestry, Insects are not insignificant for people. Bugwood.org Bugs actually benefit humans as well. They pollinate crops that we need for food and pollinate beautiful flowers that we enjoy viewing. They also act as sanitation workers cleaning up our wastes. Despite their sometimes-creepy appearance, they are important to our environment. If you feel that you are in danger of being bitten or stung by an insect, walk or run away instead of killing it. Sometimes, people feel unsafe near bugs, so they decide to kill them immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Pennsylvania Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws PERMITS, MULTI-YEAR LICENSES, BUTTONS
    2018PENNSYLVANIA FISHING SUMMARY Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws 2018 Fishing License BUTTON WHAT’s NeW FOR 2018 l Addition to Panfish Enhancement Waters–page 15 l Changes to Misc. Regulations–page 16 l Changes to Stocked Trout Waters–pages 22-29 www.PaBestFishing.com Multi-Year Fishing Licenses–page 5 18 Southeastern Regular Opening Day 2 TROUT OPENERS Counties March 31 AND April 14 for Trout Statewide www.GoneFishingPa.com Use the following contacts for answers to your questions or better yet, go onlinePFBC to the LOCATION PFBC S/TABLE OF CONTENTS website (www.fishandboat.com) for a wealth of information about fishing and boating. THANK YOU FOR MORE INFORMATION: for the purchase STATE HEADQUARTERS CENTRE REGION OFFICE FISHING LICENSES: 1601 Elmerton Avenue 595 East Rolling Ridge Drive Phone: (877) 707-4085 of your fishing P.O. Box 67000 Bellefonte, PA 16823 Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000 Phone: (814) 359-5110 BOAT REGISTRATION/TITLING: license! Phone: (866) 262-8734 Phone: (717) 705-7800 Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. The mission of the Pennsylvania Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday PUBLICATIONS: Fish and Boat Commission is to Monday through Friday BOATING SAFETY Phone: (717) 705-7835 protect, conserve, and enhance the PFBC WEBSITE: Commonwealth’s aquatic resources EDUCATION COURSES FOLLOW US: www.fishandboat.com Phone: (888) 723-4741 and provide fishing and boating www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia opportunities. REGION OFFICES: LAW ENFORCEMENT/EDUCATION Contents Contact Law Enforcement for information about regulations and fishing and boating opportunities. Contact Education for information about fishing and boating programs and boating safety education.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon Quadrangles
    DESCRIPTION OF THE HOLLIDAYSBURG AND HUNTINGDON QUADRANGLES By Charles Butts INTRODUCTION 1 BLUE RIDGE PROVINCE topography are therefore prominent ridges separated by deep SITUATION The Blue Ridge province, narrow at its north end in valleys, all trending northeastward. The Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon quadrangles are adjoin­ Virginia and Pennsylvania, is over 60 miles wide in North RELIEF ing areas in the south-central part of Pennsylvania, in Blair, Carolina. It is a rugged region of hills and ridges and deep, The lowest point in the quadrangles is at Huntingdon, Bedford, and Huntingdon Counties. (See fig. 1.) Taken as narrow valleys. The altitude of the higher summits in Vir­ where the altitude of the river bed is about 610 feet above sea ginia is 3,000 to 5,700 feet, and in western North Carolina 79 level, and the highest point is the southern extremity of Brush Mount Mitchell, 6,711 feet high, is the highest point east of Mountain, north of Hollidaysburg, which is 2,520 feet above the Mississippi River. Throughout its extent this province sea level. The extreme relief is thus 1,910 feet. The Alle­ stands up conspicuously above the bordering provinces, from gheny Front and Dunning, Short, Loop, Lock, Tussey, Ter­ each of which it is separated by a steep, broken, rugged front race, and Broadtop Mountains rise boldly 800 to 1,500 feet from 1,000 to 3,000 feet high. In Pennsylvania, however, above the valley bottoms in a distance of 1 to 2 miles and are South Mountain, the northeast end of the Blue Ridge, is less the dominating features of the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Where to Go Camping.Pub
    - 1 - Where to go Camping Guide Washington DC District National Capital Area Council Boy Scouts of America Revision 1 - 2 - Thanks to Chad Deschane, Scoutmaster, Troop 343 for preparing this guide Table of Contents Description Page Camping Locations 0-50 miles from Washington 3 - 6 Camping Locations 50-100 miles from Washington 7 - 10 Camping Locations 100-200 miles from Washington 11 - 12 Large Scale Hikes on C&O Canal and Appalachian Trail 13 - 21 Revision 1 - 3 - Note: All distances are from center of Washington. Mileage will vary from start location. Fees and information are current as of publication and are subject to change. Camping Locations 0-50 miles from Washington Maryland Cedarville State Park, Waldorf MD - 22 Miles Fee: $15 per site per night. Huge sites will fit any Troop. Closed December-March. Reservations: Phone 1-888-432-CAMP or online at http://reservations.dnr.state.md.us/ ParKing: Most sites have parKing for 2-3 vehicles additional parKing nearby. Activities: HiKing, Archery, LNT campouts, and Wilderness Survival. Large space for most events. Great camporee location. Trash: Dumpsters Latrine: Hardened flush toilets and showers Water: Spigots Little Bennett Regional Park, Clarksburg MD - 41 Miles Fee: $21 per site per night for tent sites. Group site is $110. Reservations: Phone 301-528-3430 ParKing: Most sites have parKing for 2-3 vehicles. Activities: Orienteering, HiKing and golfing. Trash: Dumpsters Latrine: Hardened flush toilets Water: No water available on site. Swain’s Locke, Potomac MD - 45 Miles Fees: No reservations, fees, or permits are required. It’s totally, first-come, first-served camping.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Marcellus Shale in Maryland
    Introduction The Marcellus Shale in Maryland The Oriskany Sandstone is the main deep gas reservoir in western The Marcellus Shale extends continuously in the subsurface from Maryland. Appalachian gas drillers have long suspected that the dark central New York State southward to northeastern Alabama, and from gray to black shale, known as the Marcellus Shale, that overlies the Maryland westward to central Ohio. In western Maryland, the Marcellus Oriskany was the likely source for the gas within this prolifically Shale underlies all of Garrett County and much of Allegany County productive sandstone. The Marcellus was considered “tight” or (cover illustration). Within Garrett County and westernmost Allegany unproductive as a potential gas reservoir, but recent innovations in gas County the Marcellus is between 5,000 and 9,000 feet deep (Figure 2). In well drilling and stimulation have changed that long-held paradigm. In this part of Maryland, the Marcellus Shale is between 150 to 200 feet 2003 Range Resources was the first company to prove that the tight thick (Figure 3). Eastward from Dans Mountain to Town Creek, the shales of the Marcellus could produce economical amounts of gas if Marcellus has been eroded along the crests of anticlinal folds, but is drilled and stimulated unconventionally. shallowly buried within synclinal troughs. In this part of the state the shale ranges from 200 to 230 feet thick (Figure 3). From Town Creek to Origin of the Marcellus Shale Tonoloway Ridge the Marcellus is deeply buried beneath the Town Hill Figure1.IdealizedpaleogeographyofwesternMaryland385million The Marcellus Shale was deposited during the Devonian Period. The yearsago.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This
    NPS Form 10-900 ___ OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) P" (Expires Jan. 2005) / RFrFM/rnTT""————"- United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. In in IIin"Inim' Wflibutn r.r>inpit*te* the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking V in the appropriate boX Oruy entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word process, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Curtis-Shipley Farmstead other names/site number HO-439 2. Location street & number 5771 Waterloo Road D not for publication city or town Ellicott City __ ^ vicinity state Maryland code MD county Howard code 027 zip code 21043 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ^ nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ^ meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally D statewide ^ locally.
    [Show full text]