European Journal of Chemistry
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by European Journal of Chemistry European Journal of Chemistry 8 (2) (2017) 162‐167 European Journal of Chemistry Journal webpage: www.eurjchem.com Correlation analysis of the rates of solvolysis of 4‐bromopiperidine: A reaction following a Grob fragmentation pathway Dennis Neil Kevill 1, Zoon Ha Ryu 2 and Malcolm John D’Souza 3,* 1 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115‐2862, USA 2 Department of Chemistry, Dong‐Eui University, 995 Eomgwango, Busan‐Jin‐Gu, Busan 614‐714, Republic of Korea 3 Department of Chemistry, Wesley College, 120 North State Street, Dover, Delaware 19901‐3875, USA * Corresponding author at: Department of Chemistry, Wesley College, 120 North State Street, Dover, Delaware 19901‐3875, USA. Tel.: +1.302.7362528. Fax: +1.302.7362301. E‐mail address: [email protected] (M.J. D’Souza). ARTICLE INFORMATION ABSTRACT A Grunwald‐Winstein treatment of the specific rates of solvolysis of 4‐bromopiperidine gives for aqueous ethanol, methanol, acetone, and dioxane a very good logarithmic correlation against the YBr solvent ionizing power values with a slope (m value) of 0.46±0.02, consistent with the operation of a synchronous Grob fragmentation mechanism. When the organic component of the solvent is 2,2,2‐trifluoroethanol (TFE), the data points show a negative deviation, consistent with an appreciable deactivating interaction of the acidic TFE component of the solvent with the lone‐pair of electrons present on the nitrogen. DOI: 10.5155/eurjchem.8.2.162-167.1566 Received: 13 March 2017 Received in revised form: 11 April 2017 Accepted: 19 April 2017 Published online: 30 June 2017 Printed: 30 June 2017 KEYWORDS Solvolysis Mechanism Correlation 4‐Bromopiperidine Grob fragmentation Cite this: Eur. J. Chem. 2017, 8(2), 162‐167 Grunwald‐Winstein equation 1. Introduction value. The l and m values reflect the relative importance of nucleophilicity and ionizing power for a given solvolysis. A study by D’Arcy, Grob, Kaffenberger and Krasnobajew Grob and coworkers have carried out extensive studies of [1] found that, in 80% ethanol‐20% water (volume/volume), a variety of fragmentation reactions with the results largely 4‐chloropiperidine (1) undergoes solvolysis by a pathway published in German in Helvetica Chimica Acta. Fortunately, involving fragmentation, which was best described as being for readers not well versed in the German language, there are synchronous in nature. This is a reaction where a study of the two excellent reviews, which were published in both German variation of the rate, with changes in the solvent composition and English [6,7]. The first deals with the general principles of for the solvolysis, can give valuable information. In particular, heterolytic fragmentations and the second reviews the analysis in terms of a two‐term [Equation 1] or one‐term (lNT mechanistic and stereochemical considerations of the or mYX omitted) Grunwald‐Winstein equation [2,3] can fragmentations. indicate the relative importance of solvent ionizing power [4] The solvolyses of 4‐chloropiperidine (1), although 113 and solvent nucleophilicity [5] within the mechanistic times as rapid in 80% ethanol at 100 °C as the corresponding pathway. solvolysis of cyclohexyl chloride [1], were still quite slow and, to lower the temperature required, we substituted the log (k/ko)RX = lNT + mYx + c (1) corresponding bromo‐derivative, which would be expected to react some one or two orders of magnitude faster at a given In Equation (1), k and ko are the specific rates (first‐order temperature [8]. In this way, the solvolysis rates in a wide rate coefficients) for solvolysis RX in a given solvent and in variety of hydroxylic solvents could be conveniently studied at 80% ethanol (the arbitrarily chosen standard solvent), 55 °C. The 4‐bromopiperidine (2) is commercially available as respectively, l is the sensitivity to changes in solvent nucleo‐ its hydrobromide and, since we add triethylamine and/or philicity (NT), m is the sensitivity to changes in solvent ionizing hydroxide ion to neutralize the acid produced in the solvolysis power (YX for a leaving group X) and c is a constant (residual) [1] (so as to prevent protonation of the nitrogen of the European Journal of Chemistry ISSN 2153‐2249 (Print) / ISSN 2153‐2257 (Online) 2017 Atlanta Publishing House LLC ‐ All rights reserved ‐ Printed in the USA http://dx.doi.org/10.5155/eurjchem.8.2.162-167.1566 Kevill et al. / European Journal of Chemistry 8 (2) (2017) 162‐167 163 Table 1. Effect of varying the concentration of triethylamine, in the presence or absence of one equivalent of tetraethylammonium hydroxide, on the first‐order rate coefficient (k, s‐1) a for solvolysis of 2.0×10‐4 mol/dm3 4‐bromopiperidine, as formed in situ from the hydrobromide at 55.0 °C, tabulated as 104 k values. Solvent b,c [Et3N], mol/dm3 0.00040 0.00060 0.00040 (+0.00020 NEt4OH) 0.00080 80E‐20W (v/v) 1.03±0.02 0.99±0.02 1.06±0.06 1.08±0.02 30M‐70W (v/v) 32.1±0.90 32.7±0.70 37.3±0.50 40.4±0.30 80T‐20W (w/w) 1.10±0.05 1.08±0.08 1.14±0.06 1.22±0.01 70T‐30W (w/w) 1.31±0.03 1.79±0.08 1.84±0.04 1.94±0.04 a Average of at least duplicate determinations, reported together with the standard deviation. b E, W, M, T represent ethanol, water, methanol, 2,2,2‐trifluorethanol. c The (v/v) indicates volume‐volume (at 25.0 °C) and the (w/w) indicates weight‐weight. unreacted 4‐halopiperidine), we added the substrate to the Initial experiments to determine the best reaction condi‐ solvent under consideration as the hydrobromide and emp‐ tions as regards the amount of excess base are summarized in loyed sufficient base to both liberate 2 and to neutralize all of Table 1. Both triethylamine alone and triethylamine plus one the acid subsequently produced during its solvolysis. equivalent (as regards the concentration of 4‐bromopiperidine A general scheme for a Grob fragmentation [1,6,7] is (2)) tetraethylammonium hydroxide were considered. It was shown in Equation (2). found that, within reasonable limits, the amount of excess base was not critical. The concentration chosen for the conducto‐ metric determination of the specific rates of solvolysis of 4‐ (2) bromopiperidine at 55.0 °C and the procedure for preparing 2.0 mL of solution are presented in footnote (a) to Table 2. This is the mechanism that was applied [1,6,7] to the Details of the conductivity apparatus and the computer fragmentation of 4‐chloropiperidine in 80% ethanol‐20% procedure for calculation of the specific rates have previously water, Equation (3). been reported [16,17]. The regression analyses were perfor‐ med using commercially available statistical packages. 3. Results and discussion In Table 1 is shown the effect of varying the triethylamine concentration on the first‐order rate coefficient (specific rate) for solvolysis when the 4‐bromopiperidine (2) is introduced as its hydrobromide to four typical aqueous‐organic solvents at 55.0 °C. Also shown is the effect of including one equivalent of (3) tetraethylammonium hydroxide for the initial deprotonation of the 4‐bromopiperidinium ion, to liberate the free 2. The first The carbimonium ion formed is then spontaneously vertical column in the table is for addition of two equivalents hydrolyzed to 1‐amino‐3‐butene which, after treatment with of triethylamine, the minimum amount for the initial deproto‐ p‐toluenesulfonyl chloride and sodium hydroxide, was isolated nation followed by complete neutralization of the acid produ‐ [1] as the ditosyl derivative [CH2=CH‐CH2‐CH2‐N(SO2C6H4‐p‐ ced during the solvolysis. The next two vertical columns would CH3)2], which could be stabilized by hydrogenation of the each have an excess of one equivalent of triethylamine and the double bond. final vertical column is for an excess of two equivalents of In a study of the trifluoroacetolysis of variously substi‐ triethylamine over the minimum required to allow a complete tuted tetrahydropyranyl methanesulfonates (mesylates) [9], it solvolysis of the unprotonated 2. was demonstrated that the tetrahydropyranyl cation was a In all four solvent systems, the highest specific rate values common intermediate for Grob fragmentation [following the are for the runs with the largest triethylamine concentration, upper pathway of Equation (4)], Prins cyclizations [10] and 2‐ but the increases in specific rate with increases in excess oxonia‐Cope rearrangements [11]. This suggested that it amine concentration are small. This aspect of the study indica‐ would be worthwhile to see if any evidence for this type of tes that a modest excess of triethylamine, assuring an non‐synchronous pathway could be found in the solvolyses of essentially complete deprotonation of the 4‐bromopiperidine 4‐bromopiperidine (2). throughout the solvolysis, would afford the best conditions for a study of its solvolysis reactions. In Table 2, the specific rates (first‐order rate coefficients) are presented for the solvolysis of 2.0×10‐4 mol/dm 2, in the presence of 6.0×10‐4 mol/dm triethylamine, in 100% H20 and (4) in thirty‐two aqueous‐organic solvents, all of which have tabulated values for both NT and YBr available. These known NT 2. Experimental and YBr values are also tabulated in Table 2, and their sources indicated as footnotes. The 4‐bromopiperidine hydrobromide (Aldrich, 98%), When the original (one‐term) Grunwald‐Winstein triethylamine (Aldrich ≥ 99.5%) and tetraethylammonium equation [4,18] [Equation (1) without the l NT term] is applied hydroxide (Aldrich, 35% by weight in water) were used as to the data of Table 2, it is found that the specific rates of received.