Sri Lanka 2014 BIRDS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Importance of Muraviovka Park, Amur Province, Far East Russia, For
FORKTAIL 33 (2017): 81–87 The importance of Muraviovka Park, Amur province, Far East Russia, for bird species threatened at regional, national and international level based on observations between 2011 and 2016 WIELAND HEIM & SERGEI M. SMIRENSKI The middle reaches of the Amur River in Far East Russia are still an under-surveyed region, yet holding a very high regional biodiversity. During a six-year survey at Muraviovka Park, a non-governmental nature reserve, 271 bird species have been recorded, 14 of which are globally threatened, highlighting the importance of this area for bird conservation. INTRODUCTION RESULTS Recent studies have shown that East Asia and especially the Amur A total of 271 species was recorded inside Muraviovka Park between basin hold huge numbers of endangered species, and the region was 2011 and 2016; 24 species are listed as Near Treatened (NT), designated as a hotspot of threatened biodiversity (e.g. Vignieri 2014). Vulnerable (VU), Endangered (EN) or Critically Endangered (CR) Tis is especially true for birds. Te East Asian–Australasian Flyway (BirdLife International 2017a), 31 species in the Russian Red Data is not only one of the richest in species and individuals but is also the Book (Iliashenko & Iliashenko 2000) (Ru) and 60 species in the least surveyed and most threatened fyway (Yong et al. 2015). Current Amur region Red Data Book (Glushchenko et al. 2009) (Am). In data about distribution, population size and phenology are virtually the case of the Russian and Amur regional Red Data Books, the lacking for many regions, including the Amur region, Far East Russia. -
Gibbon Journal Nr
Gibbon Journal Nr. 5 – May 2009 Gibbon Conservation Alliance ii Gibbon Journal Nr. 5 – 2009 Impressum Gibbon Journal 5, May 2009 ISSN 1661-707X Publisher: Gibbon Conservation Alliance, Zürich, Switzerland http://www.gibbonconservation.org Editor: Thomas Geissmann, Anthropological Institute, University Zürich-Irchel, Universitätstrasse 190, CH–8057 Zürich, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected] Editorial Assistants: Natasha Arora and Andrea von Allmen Cover legend Western hoolock gibbon (Hoolock hoolock), adult female, Yangon Zoo, Myanmar, 22 Nov. 2008. Photo: Thomas Geissmann. – Westlicher Hulock (Hoolock hoolock), erwachsenes Weibchen, Yangon Zoo, Myanmar, 22. Nov. 2008. Foto: Thomas Geissmann. ©2009 Gibbon Conservation Alliance, Switzerland, www.gibbonconservation.org Gibbon Journal Nr. 5 – 2009 iii GCA Contents / Inhalt Impressum......................................................................................................................................................................... i Instructions for authors................................................................................................................................................... iv Gabriella’s gibbon Simon M. Cutting .................................................................................................................................................1 Hoolock gibbon and biodiversity survey and training in southern Rakhine Yoma, Myanmar Thomas Geissmann, Mark Grindley, Frank Momberg, Ngwe Lwin, and Saw Moses .....................................4 -
Gliding Dragons and Flying Squirrels: Diversifying Versus Stabilizing Selection on Morphology Following the Evolution of an Innovation
vol. 195, no. 2 the american naturalist february 2020 E-Article Gliding Dragons and Flying Squirrels: Diversifying versus Stabilizing Selection on Morphology following the Evolution of an Innovation Terry J. Ord,1,* Joan Garcia-Porta,1,† Marina Querejeta,2,‡ and David C. Collar3 1. Evolution and Ecology Research Centre and the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales 2052, Australia; 2. Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC–Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37–49, Barcelona 08003, Spain; 3. Department of Organismal and Environmental Biology, Christopher Newport University, Newport News, Virginia 23606 Submitted August 1, 2018; Accepted July 16, 2019; Electronically published December 17, 2019 Online enhancements: supplemental material. Dryad data: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.t7g227h. fi abstract: Evolutionary innovations and ecological competition are eral de nitions of what represents an innovation have been factors often cited as drivers of adaptive diversification. Yet many offered (reviewed by Rabosky 2017), this classical descrip- innovations result in stabilizing rather than diversifying selection on tion arguably remains the most useful (Galis 2001; Stroud morphology, and morphological disparity among coexisting species and Losos 2016; Rabosky 2017). Hypothesized innovations can reflect competitive exclusion (species sorting) rather than sympat- have drawn considerable attention among ecologists and ric adaptive divergence (character displacement). We studied the in- evolutionary biologists because they can expand the range novation of gliding in dragons (Agamidae) and squirrels (Sciuridae) of ecological niches occupied within communities. In do- and its effect on subsequent body size diversification. We found that gliding either had no impact (squirrels) or resulted in strong stabilizing ing so, innovations are thought to be important engines of selection on body size (dragons). -
Madagascar, 1998
A mammal, bird, reptile, orchid and people-watching trip to - Madagascar (and a very short stay in Mauritius) 18-10-98 to 21-11-98 Dave Siems and Steve Anyon-Smith “weird (verb) – Madagascar” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ When our first guide, Patrice Rabearisoa, asked us what we wanted to see, he went white (not easy) at our reply – “we want to see all the birds, mammals, reptiles, orchids and everything else of interest in the forest, in no particular order.” He showed us all these things and more in the paradise that was, and still is, in parts, Madagascar. Outline of Trip “Madagascar” I said to Dave, and his eyes lit up. Five weeks later we were looking at lemurs. Our advice was that there was no safe or even practical way to visit a country populated by thieves, thugs and other human detritus of the worst order. There was said to be no usable public transport and if the food or the locals didn’t kill you, the insects most definitely would. So Dave and I set out to test these propositions. Madagascar is renowned for its wildlife, political instability and not much else. Our mission was to see as much of the native fauna and flora as possible during a five-week stay. We used public transport at all times and hired local guides at every location (this is generally compulsory anyway). We scattered ourselves widely throughout the country as the habitats are extremely varied, boasting rainforest, semi-desert, the so-called spiny forest and anything in between. Our expectations for the trip were not high given that we had little prior information and fully expected to be roasted slowly over a kitchen fire somewhere if we had managed to avoid perishing in a traffic accident. -
Bird Records from Laos, October 1994-August 1995
FORKTAIL 13 (1998): 33-68 Bird records from Laos, October 1994-August 1995 J. W. DUCKWORTH, R. J. TIZARD, R. J. TIMMINS, R. M. THEWLIS, W. G. ROBICHAUD and T. D. EVANS Between October 1994 and June 1995 birds were surveyed at six main areas in Laos, with incidental observations at many other sites extending until August 1995. Most effort was at four sites between 17°26' Nand 18°40' N (the Nakay Plateau, Phou Khaokhoay National Biodiversity Conservation Area (NBCA), Nam Kading NBCA and three nearby limestone outcrops), but there was extensive work on the Bolaven Plateau to the south and a brief visit to Phou Dendin NBCA in the extreme north. The latter is the first bird survey of a site much north of Vientiane since 1950. Information was collected for 15 Globally Threatened species and 28 Globally Near- Threatened species (sensu Collar et al. 1994), nine species At Risk in Laos, seven potentially so and one where threats in Laos are little known (sensu Thewlis et aL in prep.). A further Globally Near-Threatened species was recorded provisionally. Records of Grey-sided Thrush Turdus ftae and Black-headed Bunting Emberiza melanocephala were the first for Indochina. Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ftrruginea, Lesser Cuckoo Cuculus poliocephalus,Pallas's Gull Larus ichthyaetus (from December 1995), Dunlin Calidris alpina, Long-toed Stint C subminutaand Chestnut-vented Nuthatch Sitta nagaensiswere new to Laos and Eurasian Blackbird Turdus merula to Cambodia. A total of 12 (plus one provisionally identified), nine and five (plus one provisionally identified) species were found new for North, Central and South Laos respectively. -
Costs and Benefits Among Participants in Mixed
COSTS AND BENEFITS AMONG PARTICIPANTS IN MIXED. SPECIES FORAGING BIRD FLOCKS IN LOWLAND DECIDUOUS FORESTS, HUAI KHA KHAENG WILDLIFE SANCTUARY WICHYANAN LIMPARUNGPATTHANAKIJ A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY) FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY 2014 COP}'RIGHT OF MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY Fac. ofGrad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. Thesis / iv COSTS AND BENEFITS AMONG PARTICIPANTS IN MIXED.SPECIESI FORAGING BIRD FLOCKS IN LOWLAND DECIDUOUS FORERESTS, HUAI KHA KHAENC WILDLIFE SANCTUARY WICHYANAN LIMPARLINGPATTHANAKIJ 5337750 SCEB/M M.Sc. (ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOCY) TLIESIS ADVISORY COMMITTEE: JENJIT KHUDAMRONGSA' GEORGE ANDREW GALE. Ph.D, ABSTRACT This study focused on mixed-species flocks of birbirds in a lowland deciduous forest a habitat type threatened heavily in the regioegion, p marily from logging and clearance for agriculture, and which is understudied)d irin comparison with evergreell forests. Data on the composition and structure of a totaltor of 657 mixed- species foraging bird flocks were collected fi:om January to Decemcember, 2012 in Huai Kha Khaeng Wiidlife Sanctuary, Thailand. The flocks could be dividlivided into two types: those composed of small-sized birds and those composed of mediurrdium-sized birds. The species most prevalent in flocks included gregarious "leader"er" species, such as laughingtluLrshes (Garrulax spp.), the conspicuous anti-predaredator alalm-calling ''serltinel" species such as drongos (.Dictulus spp.). and the BlacBlack-naped Monarch (Hypothymis dzwea). Most species showed a lower mixed-flocking.ing propensity during the breeding seasot. Several species in medium-sized bird flocksrks showeds significant behavioral adiustments in which they foraged closer to the groundnd irin mixed flocks led by (ground-feeding) laughingthrushes. -
Munnar Hills Kite Flying Hazards Ashy Woodswallow | Vol
VOL. 10 NO. 1 Munnar Hills Kite flying hazards Ashy Woodswallow | Vol. 10 No. 1 10 | Vol. RDS I B Indian Indian BIRDS www.indianbirds.in VOL. 10 NO. 1 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 30 APRIL 2015 ISSN 0973-1407 EDITOR: Aasheesh Pittie Contents [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITORS: V. Santharam, Praveen J. EDITORIAL BOARD Maan Barua, Anwaruddin Choudhury 1 Bird diversity of protected areas in the Munnar Hills, Kerala, Bill Harvey, Farah Ishtiaq, Rajah Jayapal India Madhusudan Katti, R. Suresh Kumar Praveen J. & Nameer P. O. Taej Mundkur, Rishad Naoroji, Prasad Ganpule Suhel Quader, Harkirat Singh Sangha, C. Sashikumar, Manoj Sharma, S. Subramanya, 13 Kite flying: Effect ofChinese manja on birds in Bangalore, India K. S. Gopi Sundar Sharat Babu, S. Subramanya & Mohammed Dilawar CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Ragupathy Kannan, Lavkumar Khachar (1931-2015) 19 Some notes on the breeding of Ashy Woodswallow CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHERS Artamus fuscus in Gujarat, India Clement Francis, Ramki Sreenivasan Raju Vyas & Kartik Upadhyay LAYOUT & COVER DESIGN: K. Jayaram OffICE: P. Rambabu 23 A record of Sooty Tern Onychoprion fuscatus from Gujarat, India NEW ORNIS FOUNDATION M. U. Jat & B. M. Parasharya Registration No. 314/2004 Sighting of the Eurasian Bittern Botaurus stellaris at Amravati, FOUNDER TRUSTEES 24 Zafar Futehally (1920–2013) Maharashtra, India Aasheesh Pittie, V. Santharam Rahul Gupta TRUSTEES Aasheesh Pittie, V. Santharam, Rishad Naoroji, A Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major in Nagaland Taej Mundkur, S. Subramanya, 25 Suhel Quader, Praveen J. Jainy Kuriakose, Dileep Kumar V. P., Chewang R. Bonpo & Peter Lobo AIMS & OBJECTIVES • To publish a newsletter that will provide a platform to birdwatchers for publishing notes and observations Sighting of Short-tailed Shearwater Ardenna tenuirostris, and primarily on birds of South Asia. -
Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2. -
Melagiris (Tamil Nadu)
MELAGIRIS (TAMIL NADU) PROPOSAL FOR IMPORTANT BIRD AREA (IBA) State : Tamil Nadu, India District : Krishnagiri, Dharmapuri Coordinates : 12°18©54"N 77°41©42"E Ownership : State Area : 98926.175 ha Altitude : 300-1395 m Rainfall : 620-1000 mm Temperature : 10°C - 35°C Biographic Zone : Deccan Peninsula Habitats : Tropical Dry Deciduous, Riverine Vegetation, Tropical Dry Evergreen Proposed Criteria A1 (Globally Threatened Species) A2 (Endemic Bird Area 123 - Western Ghats, Secondary Area s072 - Southern Deccan Plateau) A3 (Biome-10 - Indian Peninsula Tropical Moist Forest, Biome-11 - Indo-Malayan Tropical Dry Zone) GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Melagiris are a group of hills lying nestled between the Cauvery and Chinnar rivers, to the south-east of Hosur taluk in Tamil Nadu, India. The Melagiris form part of an almost unbroken stretch of forests connecting Bannerghatta National Park (which forms its north-western boundary) to the forests of Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary - Karnataka (which forms its southern boundary, separated by the river Cauvery), and further to Biligirirangan hills and Sathyamangalam forests. The northern and western parts are comparatively plain and is part of the Mysore plateau. The average elevation in this region is 500-1000 m. Ground sinks to 300m in the valley of the Cauvery and the highest point is the peak of Guthereyan at 1395.11 m. Red sandy loam is the most common soil type found in this region. Small deposits of alluvium are found along Cauvery and Chinnar rivers and Kaoline is found in some areas near Jowlagiri. The temperature ranges from 10°C ± 35°C. South-west monsoon is fairly active mostly in the northern areas, but north-east monsoon is distinctly more effective in the region. -
List of Bird Species Seen in and Around Maharshi Parshuram College of Engineering, Velneshwar, Guhagar, Maharashtra
List of bird species seen in and around Maharshi Parshuram College of Engineering, Velneshwar, Guhagar, Maharashtra. 1. Ashy prinia (Prinia socialis) 2. Ashy drongo (Dicrurus leucophaeus) 3. Barn owl (Tyto alba) (Personal Communications). 4. Baya weaver (Ploceus philippinus) (Sugaran) 5. Black drongo (Dicrurus macrocercus) with brown coloured wing tips. 6. Black kite (Milvus migrans). 7. Black shouldered Kite (Elanus axillaris) 8. Brahminy kite (Hailiaster indus) 9. Brown headed barbet ( heard its call) (Megalaima zeylanica) 10. Cattle egret (Bulbucus ibis) 11. Changeable hawk eagle (Nisaetus cirrhatus) 12. Common babbler (Turdoides caudatus) 13. Common hoopoe (Upupa epops) 14. Common Iora (Aegithina tiphia) (Subhag) 15. Common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) 16. Common lesser white-throat (Sylvia curruca) 17. Common myna (Acridotheres tristis) 18. Common sandpiper (Tringa hypoleucus) 19. Common tailor bird (Orthotomus sutorius) 20. Coppersmith barbet (Megalaima haemacephala) 21. Cotton pygmy goose (??) (Nettapus coromandelianus) 22. Crested lark (Galerida cristata). 23. Eurasian blackbird (Turdus merula) 24. Greater coucal (Centropus sinensis) 25. Greater spotted eagle (??) (Aquila clanga) 26. Grey francolin (?? Seen young ones of this species) (Francolinus pondicerianus). 27. House crow (Corvus Splendenus). 28. House sparrow (??) (Passer domessticus) 29. Indian koel (Eudynamys scolopaceus). 30. Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus) 31. Indian robin (Saxicoloides fulicata). 32. Jungle crow (Corvus macrorhynchos). 33. Jungle myna (Acridotheres fuscus) 34. Jungle prinia (Prinia sylvatica) 35. Little cormorant (Phalacrocorax fuscicollis) 36. Lesser golden-backed woodpecker (Dinopium benghalense) 37. Little brown dove or Laughing dove (Spilopelia senegalensis) 38. Orange headed thrush (Geokichla citrina) 39. Oriental bay-owl (??) (heard once its call) (Phodilus badius) 40. Oriental magpie robin (OMR) (Copsychus saularis). 41. Oriental pied hornbill (Anthracoceros albirostris) (Kakaner) 42. -
Description of the Nest and Nestling of Great Eared Nightjar Eurostopodus Macrotis from Luzon, Philippines
128 SHORT NOTES Forktail 20 (2004) Kennedy, R. S. and Ruedas, L. S. (1992) Centers of biological diver- Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N. and Mittermeier, C. G. (1999) sity in the Philippines: surveys, training, and museum Hotspots: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial modernization. Unpublished. ecosystems. Mexico City: CEMEX. Magsalay, P., Brooks, T., Dutson, G. and Timmins, R. (1995) Swedish Space Corporation [SSC] (1988) Mapping of the natural Extinction and conservation on Cebu. Nature 373: 294. conditions of the Philippines. Final Report. 30 April 1988. Mallari, N. A. D., Tabaranza, B. R. and Crosby, M. J. (2001) Key Unpublished. conservation sites in the Philippines: a Haribon Foundation and BirdLife International directory of Important Bird Areas. Makati City: Bookmark, Inc. N. A. D. Mallari, Haribon Foundation for the Conservation of Natural Resources, 4/F Fil Garcia Tower, 140 Kalayaan Avenue and corner of Mayaman Street, Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines. Email: [email protected] M. J. Crosby, BirdLife International,Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 0NA, U.K. Email: [email protected] N. J. Collar, Conservation Biology Group, Department of Zoology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ and BirdLife International,Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 0NA, U.K. Email: [email protected] Description of the nest and nestling of Great Eared Nightjar Eurostopodus macrotis from Luzon, Philippines J. S. STRIJK During March and April 2002, I conducted fieldwork and Nurney 1998, Kennedy et al. 2000). However, its 6–7 km north-east of Masipi-East, Barangay Masipi- nest, eggs and chicks had not been previously East, Cabagan municipality, Isabela province, on described. -
Range Overlap Drives Chromosome Inversion Fixation in Passerine Birds 4 5 Daniel M
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/053371; this version posted May 14, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 1 2 3 Range Overlap Drives Chromosome Inversion Fixation in Passerine Birds 4 5 Daniel M. Hooper1,2 6 7 1Commitee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 8 2 E-mail: [email protected] 9 10 11 Friday, May 6, 2016 12 13 14 Short title: Chromosomal inversions in passerine birds bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/053371; this version posted May 14, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 2 15 Chromosome inversions evolve frequently but the reasons why remain largely enigmatic. I 16 used cytological descriptions of 410 species of passerine birds (order Passeriformes) to 17 identify pericentric inversion differences between species. Using a new fossil-calibrated 18 phylogeny I examine the phylogenetic, demographic, and genomic context in which these 19 inversions have evolved. The number of inversion differences between closely related 20 species was highly variable yet consistently predicted by a single factor: whether the 21 ranges of species overlapped. This observation holds even when the analysis is restricted 22 to sympatric sister pairs known to hybridize, and which have divergence times estimated 23 similar to allopatric pairs.