Kulanu B'yachad All of Us Together

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kulanu B'yachad All of Us Together MJCBYELUL 5773 - TISHREI 5774 SEPTEMBER 2013 NEWSVOLUME 108 NUMBER 1 Kulanu B’Yachad Inside All of Us Together Schedule of Services 2 Notes From Your Leaders 3 High Holiday Schedule 6 Synagogue News 7 Family News 12 School News 13 Youth News 14 Sisterhood News 15 Contributions 18 Yahrzeit 20 Calendar 23 Shana Tova Umetukah SCHEDULE OF SERVICES Friday, August 30 Morristown Jewish Center 7:17pm Candlelighting 6:15pm Services Beit Yisrael Saturday, August 31 9:30am Services CLERGY & STAFF Doug Landsman & Todd Sedra: Nitzavim/Vayelech Rabbi David J. Nesson Schleifstein, Men’s Club Bat Mitzvah of Avianna Miller 8:30pm Selichot Program and Services Cantor Vadim Yucht Kathy Neibart, Membership Gerry Gross, Executive Director Michelle Usiskin, Minyonaires Wednesday, September 4 Shai Lewitter, USY and Kadima Advisor Howard Baum & Paul Green, Ritual 7:09pm Candlelighting Karen London, Sababah Advisor Lynne Rosenfeld & Jill Frankel, 6:30pm Erev Rosh Hashanah Services Adam Smith, Sababah Junior Advisor Co-Presidents of Sisterhood Thursday, September 5 Mia Mutascio, Office Manager Trish Grushkin, Shalom Yeladim First Day of Rosh Hashanah Flo Sager, Religious School Administrator Committee Chair See Detailed Schedule on Page 7 Michelle Nulman & Gail Sulkin, Louis Bodian, Social Action 2:00pm Lunch with the Clergy following Co-Directors of Education Jeffrey Grayzel & Adam Smith, Youth Groups services Tamara Goldberg, Bookkeeper 5:20pm Tashlich at Speedwell Lake Peppi Glass, Adult Education 6:45pm Mincha/Maariv Richard Gaskins, Custodian SISTERHOOD SUPPORT Friday, September 6 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Judaica Gift Shop Second Day of Rosh Hashanah Robert Berns & Fern Spitzer, Co-Presidents See Detailed Schedule on Page 7 Deborah Brody, First Vice President Meryl Balaban (973) 366-6668 7:05pm Candlelighting Sharon Barkauskas (973) 285-1877 6:15pm Services Dorothy Cohen, Second Vice President Julie Perlow & Rebecca Wanatick, Donna Gross (973) 895-5553 Saturday, September 7 Co-Third Vice Presidents Vivian Laska (973) 984-8178 9:30am Services Shabbat Shuva Mark Bender, Treasurer Kiddush Committee Sedra: Ha’azinu Eric Weinstock, Immediate Past President Harriet Sakofs (973) 292-1959 Friday, September 13 Ira Hammer, Advisor Michelle Usiskin (973) 543-5795 Erev Yom Kippur David Reingold, Advisor Sisterhood Torah Fund 6:54pm Candlelighting Beth Hancock (646) 872-7000 5:45pm Kol Nidre for Kids ARMS OF THE SYNAGOGUE & Andrea Needel (973) 895-2807 6:30pm Kol Nidre (Main Services) COMMITTEE CHAIRS Linda Rosenbaum (973) 895-2390 Saturday, September 14 Michael Needle, AIPAC Chapter Flower Fund Yom Kippur Jeremy Diringer & Todd Schleifstein, Lauren Najarian (973) 343-7419 See Detailed Schedule on Page 7 Board of Education Library Donor Wall Mark Bender, Facilities Thursday. September 19 Sharon Barkauskas (973) 285-1877 First Day of Sukkot Dorothy Cohen & Donna Gross, Fundraising 9:30am Services Marcy Needle, Gemilut Hasadim NEWSLETTER H. Lewis Stone, History Committee Steve Gardberg, Editor Friday, September 20 Keith Usiskin, Kol Nidre Appeal Second Day of Sukkot Lili Rosenstreich, Designer 9:30am Services Rita Fand, Donna Gross, Marcy Needle, Bailey 6:42pm Candlelighting Rechler, Copy Editors 6:00pm Magical Shabbat in the Sukkah 7:30pm Services Saturday, September 21 9:30am Services Sedra: Hol Hamoed Sukkot Morristown Jewish Center Beit Yisrael is your community. Thursday. September 26 Our clergy is here for you. Please let us know when you need us—if someone is Shemini Atzeret 9:30am Services with Yizkor ill or in the hospital—or when you want to share your good news: a new baby, a 7:00pm Maariv and Hakafot marriage, or other simcha. We want to know; but you have to tell us. Please call Friday, September 27 the office at (973) 538-9292 or email office@mjcby. Simchat Torah 9:30am Services org. When you have experienced the death of a loved 6:30pm Candlelighting one, please contact Rabbi Nesson at (973) 538-9292 8:15pm Services or (973) 285-9772 before you make any plans. In Saturday, September 28 this way he will be the most helpful in making these 9:30am Services Sedra: Bereshit preparations in a proper Jewish manner. 2 • ELUL 5773 - TISHREI 5774 SEPTEMBER 2013 FROM THE DESK OF THE RABBI Four Ways NOT to Say You Are Sorry and Four Ways to Ask Forgiveness dedicate this versity of Massachusetts Medical School means nothing. Iarticle to two and the author of a book called On Apol- Such half-hearted or quarter-hearted words—the two ogy lists a number of pseudo-apologies apologies don’t work. In fact, according to words that stand at the center of Rosh Ha- that we have all heard and that we have Dr. Lazare, they make things worse. They shanah and Yom Kippur. The two words are: occasionally tried to get away with. are patronizing. The message is: if you forgive me. Here are four attempts at apology that weren’t so hypersensitive, if you weren’t And I dedicate this article to three other just don’t work. so thin skinned, nothing would have been words that are also at the essence of our One is to say, “Mistakes were made.” wrong. Yamim Noraim, our High Holidays: I am What does that mean? Who is the subject Maimonides, in his Hilchot Teshuva, sorry. of that sentence? Mistakes were made— Laws of Repentance, spells out four steps This is the season of the year when we by whom? If you can’t say that you made in a genuine apology. Here is what he says: are supposed to apologize and ask forgive- the mistake but can only say that mistakes 1. You have to acknowledge and take ness from each other for whatever hurt we were made, that does not count as an responsibility for your bad behavior. Not have caused each other during the year apology. Nice try, but it does not count. saying, “The devil made me do it,” or “I that is now ending. A second cop-out is to say, “To the ex- didn’t mean to do it,” or “My heredity or Apologizing is not an easy thing to do, tent that you were offended, I am sorry.” my environment made me do it.” Step one especially in our culture where it is consid- That puts the onus on the other person, is to say, “I did it.” ered a sign of weakness to say, “I’m sorry.” not on you. It is their hang up, it is their 2. The second step is to express your But that is not the way the Jewish tra- fault that they took offense about what sorrow. “I am sorry that I did it, and that dition understands it. In the Jewish tra- you said or did. This seems to be the An- this and this happened as a result.” dition, the ability to say, “Please forgive thony Weiner version of apology. Again, 3. The third step is to make amends. “I me” is considered a sign of strength, not nice try, but it does not count as a real broke the statue? I would like to pay for of weakness. Erich Segal, the author of apology. it.” “I bad mouthed you in front of your Love Story, may have been the son of a A third non-apology is to say, “You can’t friends? I would like to tell them I was rabbi but he really got it all wrong when expect me to be perfect.” True, but you wrong.” “I may not be able to undo all the he wrote, “Love means never having to can expect me to be regretful when I do harm that I did but I wish that I could and say you’re sorry.” It is just the other way something that hurts you. Even if I am not I will to the extent that I can.” around. perfect, I can be careful and thoughtful 4. The fourth step is to promise you will If you love someone and you hurt them, and try to avoid hurting other people. Sor- not do it again. then the thing to do, according to the Jew- ry but “You can’t expect me to be perfect” These are the steps to making a genuine ish tradition, is to say that you’re sorry. doesn’t quite cut it. apology. Apologizing is not easy. We hesitate to The fourth alibi is to say, “If I have I share these thoughts about how to say, “We are sorry” for fear that our apol- hurt anybody, I’m sorry.” The “if” is the apologize with you because this is the ogy will be rejected. We hesitate to say, giveaway. It means, I don’t really think I agenda for this season of the year; this “I was wrong” since it is embarrassing to did anything wrong, but if you think so, I is the time when we are all supposed to admit that we have done wrong. apologize. And addressing the apology to be engaged in the task of making up with And yet, whether we like to or not, “anybody” is not right either. The whole those whom we have hurt. Once we do, we whether we want to or not, this is the sea- point of teshuvah is to understand that can enter the New Year with renewal. son of the year when we are all supposed you have hurt someone specific, that you to apologize and make amends for the have hurt this person who is standing in Rabbi Nesson harm we have done to each other. front of you, and apologizing to “anybody” Dr. Aaron Lazare, the dean of the Uni- is the same as apologizing to nobody. It ELUL 5773 - TISHREI 5774 SEPTEMBER 2013 • 3 A NOTE FROM THE cantor ear Friends, on job education to newcomers from the Alex was a man who picked up his shirts D As the Jew- Association of New Americans in the North at the dry cleaner and, before going to ish New Year will Tower of the World Trade Center.
Recommended publications
  • In Search of the Center
    In Search of the Center By Dahlia Scheindlin After the Second Intifada (2000-2005), Israel appeared to be hurtling towards rightwing politics with no end in sight. From 2009, the towering figurehead of the right, Benjamin Netanyahu, won election after election. As public sentiment veered to the right, parties competed for extreme nationalist and expansionist policies, and there seemed to be no stopping the trend. Yet the party that finally came close to beating Netanyahu in April 2019, then surpassed Likud in a second round in September that year, was not a competitor from the right but a rival from the Israeli center. Blue and White was an unlikely challenger. The party was cobbled together ad hoc ahead of the April 2019 elections, led by three former generals with no obvious political ideology, party institutions or base of support beyond the voters of one of the constituent parties in its joint slate, Yesh Atid. The latter was largely viewed as center-left. Yet somehow, voters knew instinctively where Blue and White fit on Israel’s map – the center. The party’s own leaders worked hard to convey a centrist image as their brand, as well. But do centrist political movements ever succeed in Israel? Can a centrist party become a defining force of Israeli politics, and if so, what exactly does centrism mean in Israel? The Pull of the Center On the face of it, centrist politics sound like a potential antidote to Israel’s notoriously polarized, fragmented, and aggressive political culture. A center party could become a vehicle to promote moderation and pragmatic policies, in theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • Netanyahu's April 2019 Election Victory: Implications for Israel's Leadership and U.S
    CRS INSIGHT Netanyahu's April 2019 Election Victory: Implications for Israel's Leadership and U.S. Policy April 18, 2019 (IN11103) | Related Author Jim Zanotti | Jim Zanotti, Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs ([email protected], 7-1441) In elections held on April 9, 2019, the Likud party of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu tied for the most Knesset (parliament) seats. Most observers assess that, in the context of Israel's political system, Netanyahu will begin a fifth term as prime minister (1996-1999, 2009-present) after assembling a coalition government with his traditional right-leaning and ultra-Orthodox partners (see Figure 1). Netanyahu's victory came despite a significant challenge from the new Blue and White party—led by former top general Benny Gantz and prominent politician Yair Lapid (a former finance minister)—and a February announcement that Israel's attorney general would probably indict Netanyahu for alleged corruption. The Israeli election and government formation process has implications for Israeli leadership and issues relevant to U.S. policy. Whether the attorney general indicts Netanyahu could depend on potential legislation in the new Knesset, and if indictments come, Netanyahu's coalition partners may determine whether he continues as prime minister or is replaced. In turn, how Netanyahu responds to his partners' policy demands could affect Israeli decisions on key matters of U.S. interest, especially possible Israeli unilateral moves to annex settlements in the West Bank. Government Formation and Israeli Leadership In mid-April, Israeli President Reuven Rivlin concluded that Netanyahu was the Knesset member with the best chance of forming the next government, and assigned him that task.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2020/17 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman August 2020 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949{2019 Yonatan Berman∗ y August 20, 2020 Abstract This paper draws on pre- and post-election surveys to address the long run evolution of vot- ing patterns in Israel from 1949 to 2019. The heterogeneous ethnic, cultural, educational, and religious backgrounds of Israelis created a range of political cleavages that evolved throughout its history and continue to shape its political climate and its society today. De- spite Israel's exceptional characteristics, we find similar patterns to those found for France, the UK and the US. Notably, we find that in the 1960s{1970s, the vote for left-wing parties was associated with lower social class voters. It has gradually become associated with high social class voters during the late 1970s and later. We also find a weak inter-relationship between inequality and political outcomes, suggesting that despite the social class cleavage, identity-based or \tribal" voting is still dominant in Israeli politics. Keywords: Political cleavages, Political economy, Income inequality, Israel ∗London Mathematical Laboratory, The Graduate Center and Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, City University of New York, [email protected] yI wish to thank Itai Artzi, Dror Feitelson, Amory Gethin, Clara Mart´ınez-Toledano, and Thomas Piketty for helpful discussions and comments, and to Leah Ashuah and Raz Blanero from Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality for historical data on parliamentary elections in Tel Aviv.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring-Summer 2011 El Salvador Jewish Community Emerges from Centuries of Isolation and Assimilation
    Vol. 18 No. 2 Spring-Summer 2011 El Salvador Jewish Community Emerges From Centuries of Isolation and Assimilation By Rabbi Aaron Rehberg Introduction by the Editor In addition to the approximately 60 families which make up the mainstream Jewish community of El Sal- vador, there are three smaller groups of Jews living in the south-central part of the country in the towns of Armenia, San Salvador and Nauisalco. Here 260 men, women and children, most of whom are descended from Spanish/Portuguese émigrés fleeing the Spanish Inquisition, have embraced their Jewish roots and are following an orthodox life style. The rest are Jews by choice. For the past 12 years, community leaders have taken to the Internet to learn how to follow Jewish law, how to pray, how to celebrate Jewish holidays and how to prac- Rabbi Aaron Rehberg with El Salvadoran Jewish children. Photo courtesy of A. Rehberg IN THIS ISSUE tice Jewish traditions and ritual. As with the emerging Jewish community of Cameroon discussed in the last El Salvador’s Jewish Emergence ..................1 issue of the Kulanu newsletter, the Internet has pro- vided the means for this small community to reach out Remembering Lynne Elson ..........................7 and reconnect with its Jewish heritage. Bene Ephraim Notes ...................................8 In March of this year, Kulanu sent Rabbi Aaron Reh- Planned Giving ......................................11 berg of Jerusalem to visit the community for one month to instruct community members in Jewish observance, Abayudaya Anti-Poverty Project ................12 law and ritual practice. Rabbi Rehberg, himself a de- Book Review: SHOAH: Turkey, US, UK .....14 scendent of anousim (Crypto-Jews), had visited the Rendezvous with History ...........................16 community for four days in 2008 on a fact finding mis- sion and was the perfect choice for community mentor Technology & Long-Distance Learning .......19 and teacher.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Map: Where in the World Is Kulanu?.....2
    Volume 27 Number 1 Spring 2020 Supporting Isolated, Emerging, and Returning Jewish Communities around the Globe KULANU“All of Us” Contents Map: Where in the World is Kulanu? ....2 Rural South India Torah Study ..............3 A Call to Service ..................................4 A Tale Of Two Torahs ............................6 Board Spotlight: Rabbi Capers Funnye ...........8 Passover in Portugal ..........................10 Volunteer Spotlight: Gitty Gordon .......12 Kulanu Notes ......................................14 Toronto to Ghana ................................17 Thank You, Donors .............................20 Book Review .......................................22 Connect with Us Online ......................24 While volunteering in southern India, Gitty Gordon (from New York) enjoys a chai with Miryam of the Bene Ephraim community. See story on page 12. Where in the World is Kulanu in this Issue? Kulanu is in touch with dozens of communities around the world. If a community contacts us, our first step is always to listen carefully to their needs. Afterwards, we brainstorm, finance, and carry out projects to help them further their study and practice of Judaism and build their communities. This map highlights communities featured in this issue.To see a full list of all our partner communities, visit https://kulanu.org/communities. Portugal India The Philippines Ghana Brazil Ghana, p17 Portugal, p10 BURKINA FASO Belmonte Spain COTE TOGO BENIN D’IVOIRE Sefwi Wiawso, home of the Jewish community Lisbon, capital Awaso Accra, capital
    [Show full text]
  • Following Likud's Victory in Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu Faces A
    Following Likud’s victory in Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu faces a challenge to secure a stable coalition blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/03/23/following-likuds-victory-in-israel-benjamin-netanyahu-faces-a-challenge-to-secure-a-stable-coalition/ 23/03/2015 Israel held legislative elections on 17 March, with the result producing a victory for incumbent Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party. Abraham Diskin writes on the coalition formation process which will follow the elections. He notes that the most likely outcome is for Netanyahu to attempt to form a coalition of the right which includes the new centrist party Kulanu. In Israel, like in most other multi-party parliamentary systems, the main question that voters face is what governmental coalition is expected following the elections. The political outcome of elections is dictated not only by the voter, but also by the negotiations held between the leaders of the parties that gained representation in the elected parliament. Usually the government is supported in parliamentary systems by the majority of parliament members. In the lack of such a majority the government may face either a vote of no confidence in parliament or inability to implement its policies. Since the first general elections of 1949, Israel has had 33 governments. Many argue that the country switching its government on average every two years is an indication of severe stability and governability problems, but in fact the number of governments reflects in many cases technical and formal reasons and not real political difficulties. Only once, in 1990, has an Israeli cabinet faced a successful no-confidence vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Right Wing Survey Press Release
    For more information or interviews: Danae Marx, Director of International Communications +972-52-4334557 | [email protected] PRESS RELEASE Special IDI Survey of Right-Wing Voters: Overwhelming Support for Retaining Judicial Review The Israel Democracy Institute published today (August 12th) a special survey today examining attitudes of right wing voters on a number of issues related to September's election including the possibility of a unity government and recent proposals that would limit judicial review and oversight of Knesset and government decisions. The poll reveals that 42% of right-wing voters support a unity government and that 43% oppose additional political power for elected officials at the expense of the Judicial Branch of government. The survey was conducted among right wing voters from April's election who supporter the following parties: Likud, Shas, UTJ (United Torah Judaism), Yisrael Beitenu, URP (United Right Parties), Kulanu, the New Right, Zehut, and Gesher. Highlights of the Findings: 42% of those surveyed support the establishment of a unity government, compared to 44% who oppose (14% have no opinion). A breakdown of the supporters by party reveals that: Gesher voters constitute - 83% of the supporters, Kulanu - 71%, Yisrael Beitenu - 61% and the New Right - 51%. In two other parties, the proportion of opponents of the establishment of a unity government is significantly greater than that of supporters (URP - 78%; UTJ - 67%). In the Likud, 42% support a unity government while 44% oppose; in Shas-- 36% support and 43% oppose; in Zehut - 44% support and 46% oppose. Judicial Review: 43% of right-wing voters do not agree that politicians should be given more power at the expense of the justice system, compared to 47% who agree.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Map: Where in the World Is Kulanu?.....2
    94-2019 19 Volume 26 Number 2 C Fall 2019 s e r le a b Ye rating 25 Supporting Isolated, Emerging, and Returning Jewish Communities around the Globe KULANU“All of Us” Contents Map: Where in the World is Kulanu? ....2 Kulanu Across the Globe ......................3 Indian Communities ..............................6 Kulanu Notes ...................................... 11 Remembering Elaine Berg .................14 Zimbabwe Irrigation Project ................15 Kulanu Global Teaching Fellows ........18 Spotlight: Rabbi Barbara Aiello ...........21 Sukkot in Calabria, Italy ......................22 ROUGH DRAFT Thank You for Your Support ................24 Sar Habakkuk Nwafor, the spiritual leader of the Tikvat Israel Community of Abuja, Nigeria, reading a Chumash. See story about his community on page 20. Photo by Shadrach Mugoya Levi. Where in the World is Kulanu in this Issue? Kulanu is in touch with dozens of communities around the world. When we are contacted, we learn what their needs are and do our best to find ways in which to help them further their study and practice of Judaism and build their communities. You can see on this map where the communities featured in this issue of Kulanu are located. Italy India The Philippines Nigeria Brazil Gabon Zimbabwe MALAWI Nigeria, p18 Italy, p22 Zimbabwe, p15 Philippines, p24 MALI LIECH. VADZ BER SWIZERLAD ASRIA HGARY ZAMBIA NIGER Rome, capital GORIZIA LJBLJAA ZAGREB Manila, capital RIESE CROAIA RACE RILI EEZIA GILIA Community in the Harare BOSIA AD HERZEGOIA BENIN SARAJEO MOZAMBIE CROAIA Jewish community LIGRIA Abuja SEA MOEEGRO Calabria region ZIMBABWE ADRIAIC CROAIA PODGORICA SEA CORSICA meets in (R.) ROME Harare, capital Tablas, Rambon SRAI O Gulf of Guinea ORAO BOSWAA CAMEROON RRHEIA GOLLO DI SEA TARAO and home to SARDIIA CAGLIARI and Mindanao IGERIA IOIA SOH SEA REGGIO DI CALABRIA the Jewish MEDIERRAEA SEA ARICA IAL communitySOH Abuja, capital IS SICILY ABEL VALLEA ALGERIA ISIA MALA SDA CERAL RKM.
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin Netanyahu's Long Premiership and the Rise of The
    POLISH POLITICAL SCIENCE YEARBOOK, vol. 47(2) (2018), pp. 201–214 DOI: dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2018203 PL ISSN 0208-7375 www.czasopisma.marszalek.com.pl/10-15804/ppsy Artur Skorek Jagiellonian University in Kraków (Poland) Benjamin Netanyahu’s Long Premiership and the Rise of the New Political Center: Is there a Qualitative Change in the Israeli Party System? Abstract: Israel’s party system has been characterized by the bipolar rivalry between the left-wing and right-wing blocks since the late 1970s. In recent years we could have seen at least two trends that seem to diverge from this model. For the last 9 years the Likud party has formed three successive governments which has made Benjamin Netanyahu the longest continuously serving prime minister in the history of Israel. Another new occurrence is the preservation of a significant representation of the center parties for four Knesset terms in the row. The aim of the paper is to verify whether Israel’s party system has departed from the two-blocs bipolar model. Based on the empirical data (election results, government formation, party’s political platforms) it examines whether the parties’ rivalry in the years 2009 – 2018 differed qualitatively from the previous period. To answer this question the pa- per investigates three hypotheses. First – Likud has become a dominant party in Israel. Sec- ond – a dominant and stable Israeli right-wing parties’ bloc has formed. Third – an enduring and relevant center sector has emerged in Israel’s party system. Keywords: Likud; Israel; party system; center; right-wing; left-wing Introduction The history of the Israeli party system can be divided into at least two phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Elections Result: Implications for Middle East Peacemaking by David Makovsky, Michael Oren
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 1478 Israeli Elections Result: Implications for Middle East Peacemaking by David Makovsky, Michael Oren Feb 13, 2009 ABOUT THE AUTHORS David Makovsky David Makovsky is the Ziegler distinguished fellow at The Washington Institute and director of the Koret Project on Arab-Israel Relations. Michael Oren Michael Oren represents the Kulanu Party, part of the Likud coalition in the Knesset, where he serves on the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee and chairs the lobby for U.S.-Israel relations. Brief Analysis n February 11, 2008, Michael Oren and David Makovsky addressed a special Policy Forum at The O Washington Institute. Dr. Oren, a renowned scholar of Middle Eastern military and diplomatic history, is a visiting professor at Georgetown University's Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service and a senior fellow at the Shalem Center in Jerusalem. Mr. Makovsky is a senior fellow and director of the Institute's Project on the Middle East Peace Process. Dr. Oren and Mr. Makovsky spoke about the recent parliamentary elections in Israel and the likely policies of the new Israeli government. The following is a rapporteur's summary of their remarks. David Makovsky Israel is entering uncharted waters. For the first time in Israeli history, the next prime minister may not be the leader of the party that won the most Knesset seats. Although the centrist Kadima Party, led by Tzipi Livni, won the most seats, she is unlikely to cobble together the necessary sixty-one seats to form a center-left coalition. If Binyamin Netanyahu -- leader of the Likud Party, which garnered the second most seats in the elections -- can show President Shimon Peres that he can form a coalition and Livni cannot, then Netanyahu may become prime minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Election Results in Israel, 1949-2019
    Chapter 19. "Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019" Yonatan Berman Appendix: Figures, tables and raw results Main figures and tables Figure 1 Legislative election results in Israel, 1949-2019 Figure 2 Class cleavages in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 3 Vote for right and left in Tel Aviv, Israel, 1949-2019 Figure 4 Residual identity component in Tel Aviv, Israel, 1981-2015 Figure 5 Vote for right-wing and left-wing parties among unemployed and inactive voters in Israel, 2003-2015 Figure 6 The educational cleavage in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 7 Vote for right-wing parties among Sepharadic voters in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 8 The religious cleavage in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 9 The gender cleavage in Israel, 1969-2019 Appendix figures and tables Figure A1 General election results in Israel by bloc, 1949-2019 Figure A2 Income inequality in Israel, 1979-2015 Figure A3 Vote for left by social class (excluding center and Arab parties), 1969-2019 Figure A4 Vote for the Republican and Democratic candidates in New York City, 1948-2016 Figure A5 The effect of the 2003 reforms on left and right vote Figure A6 Share of voters by ethnicity and religiosity, 1969-2019 Table A1 Division of parties to blocks Table A2 The effect of the 2003 reforms on right vote Figure 18.1 - Legislative election results in Israel, 1949-2019 100% Right (Likud, Israel Beitenu, etc.) Left (Labor, Meretz, etc.) 90% Center (Kahol Lavan, etc.) Arab parties (Joint Arab List, etc.) 80% Ultra-orthodox (Shas, Yahadut HaTora, etc.) 70% 60% 50% 40% Share of votes (%) votes of Share 30% 20% 10% 0% 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019 Source: author's computations using official election results (see wpid.world).
    [Show full text]