Berni Alder (1925–2020)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Berni Alder (1925–2020) Obituary Berni Alder (1925–2020) Theoretical physicist who pioneered the computer modelling of matter. erni Alder pioneered computer sim- undergo a transition from liquid to solid. Since LLNL ulation, in particular of the dynamics hard spheres do not have attractive interac- of atoms and molecules in condensed tions, freezing maximizes their entropy rather matter. To answer fundamental ques- than minimizing their energy; the regular tions, he encouraged the view that arrangement of spheres in a crystal allows more Bcomputer simulation was a new way of doing space for them to move than does a liquid. science, one that could connect theory with A second advance concerned how non- experiment. Alder’s vision transformed the equilibrium fluids approach equilibrium: field of statistical mechanics and many other Albert Einstein, for example, assumed that areas of applied science. fluctuations in their properties would quickly Alder, who died on 7 September aged 95, decay. In 1970, Alder and Wainwright dis- was born in Duisburg, Germany. In 1933, as covered that this intuitive assumption was the Nazis came to power, his family moved to incorrect. If a sphere is given an initial push, Zurich, Switzerland, and in 1941 to the United its average velocity is found to decay much States. After wartime service in the US Navy, more slowly. This caused a re-examination of Alder obtained undergraduate and master’s the microscopic basis for hydrodynamics. degrees in chemistry from the University of Alder extended the reach of simulation. California, Berkeley. While working for a PhD In molecular dynamics, the forces between at the California Institute of Technology in molecules arise from the electronic density; Pasadena, under the physical chemist John these forces can be described only by quan- Kirkwood, he began to use mechanical com- tum mechanics. Without solving the quantum puters to explore how molecules in solids and problem, molecular dynamics would not be liquids moved in relation to each other. of spheres and followed the state of the sys- able to make precise predictions. The devel- The question he set himself, which occupied tem over time. They considered hard spheres opment of very accurate simulation methods him for the following two decades, was: “How because the dynamics could be exactly deter- for extended quantum systems is an unsolved does a system of hard spheres [representing mined, silencing criticism that the results problem to this day, although excellent results molecules] behave under various conditions?” were the product of inaccurate computer have been obtained for some situations. The During his PhD, he and the computer scientist arithmetic. The advantage of this technique simulations of a uniform system of electrons Stan Frankel developed an early Monte Carlo over Monte Carlo methods was, as its name that I performed with Alder in 1980 represent algorithm — one in which the spheres are given suggests, that it could address the dynamics one such situation. Our results for the corre- random displacements — to calculate the prop- of many-particle systems as well as their equi- lation energy of electrons underlie the theory erties of the hard-sphere fluid. The advance librium properties. used in most studies of the microscopic prop- was scooped by Nicholas Metropolis and his erties of condensed materials. group at the Los Alamos National Laboratory “He was the impresario In 1963, Alder, with Teller and others, helped in New Mexico. to set up the Department of Applied Science at After completing his PhD in 1951, Alder of younger colleagues, the University of California, Davis, to establish returned to Berkeley to teach chemistry. In pushing them to work on a graduate-training programme associated 1953, he began working as a consultant at the difficult problems.” with the Radiation Laboratory at Livermore. University of California Radiation Laboratory Alder was also one of the founders and the at Livermore (later the Lawrence Livermore editor of the Journal of Computational Physics. Laboratory), newly founded by nuclear phys- The invention of molecular dynamics is Berni Alder’s personality was unique. He icists Edward Teller and Ernest Lawrence, and Alder’s greatest legacy, and has led to appli- preferred intuitive understanding over math- in 1955 he joined the staff. The laboratory was cations in materials science, biochemistry and ematical derivations, always focusing on what well funded as part of the US effort to promote biophysics, as well as physics and chemistry. he regarded as the fundamental scientific innovation during the cold war. Alder and his Two of his fundamental contributions to sta- problems, not on short-term progress. He was group used the spare capacity of the increas- tistical mechanics stand out, and convinced never the programmer, but the impresario of ingly powerful electronic computers that the the scientific community of the technique’s younger colleagues, pushing them to work on lab deployed in the design of nuclear weapons. utility. Until he published his findings, solids difficult problems through his curiosity and Alder returned to his interest in the proper- were thought to exist as a result of attractive intense interest. ties of systems of spheres. In the mid-1950s, in interactions between molecules: the regular collaboration with his Livermore colleague arrangement of atoms in a crystal lattice is the David Ceperley is founder professor of Thomas Wainwright, he developed algo- configuration that minimizes their energy. physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana- rithms to simulate many-body systems. The Alder and Wainwright (and others using Champaign. He worked with Berni Alder at technique they used, molecular dynamics, Monte Carlo methods) showed in 1957 that as Livermore from 1978 to 1987. modelled a sequence of collisions in a system systems of hard spheres are compressed, they e-mail: [email protected] 356 | Nature | Vol 586 | 15 October 2020 ©2020 Spri nger Nature Li mited. All rights reserved. .
Recommended publications
  • Highlights Se- Mathematics and Engineering— the Lead Signers of the Letter Exhibit
    June 2003 NEWS Volume 12, No.6 A Publication of The American Physical Society http://www.aps.org/apsnews Nobel Laureates, Industry Leaders Petition April Meeting Prizes & Awards President to Boost Science and Technology Prizes and Awards were presented to seven- Sixteen Nobel Laureates in that “unless remedied, will affect call for “a Presidential initiative for teen recipients at the Physics and sixteen industry lead- our scientific and technological FY 2005, following on from your April meeting in Philadel- ers have written to President leadership, thereby affecting our budget of FY 2004, and focusing phia. George W. Bush to urge increas- economy and national security.” on the long-term research portfo- After the ceremony, ing funding for physical sciences, The letter, which is dated April lios of DOE, NASA, and the recipients and their environmental sciences, math- 14th, also indicates that “the Department of Commerce, in ad- guests gathered at the ematics, computer science and growth in expert personnel dition to NSF and NIH,” that, Franklin Institute for a engineering. abroad, combined with the di- “would turn around a decade-long special reception. The letter, reinforcing a recent minishing numbers of Americans decline that endangers the future Photo Credit: Stacy Edmonds of Edmonds Photography Council of Advisors on Science and entering the physical sciences, of our nation.” The top photo shows four of the five women recipients in front of a space-suit Technology report, highlights se- mathematics and engineering— The lead signers of the letter exhibit. They are (l to r): Geralyn “Sam” Zeller (Tanaka Award); Chung-Pei rious funding problems in the an unhealthy trend—is leading were Burton Richter, director Michele Ma (Maria-Goeppert Mayer Award); Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat physical sciences and related fields corporations to locate more of emeritus of SLAC, and Craig (Heineman Prize); and Helen Edwards (Wilson Prize).
    [Show full text]
  • Berni Julian Alder, Theoretical Physicist and Inventor of Molecular Dynamics, 1925–2020 Downloaded by Guest on September 24, 2021 9 E
    RETROSPECTIVE BerniJulianAlder,theoreticalphysicistandinventor of molecular dynamics, 1925–2020 RETROSPECTIVE David M. Ceperleya and Stephen B. Libbyb,1 Berni Julian Alder, one of the leading figures in the invention of molecular dynamics simulations used for a wide array of problems in physics and chemistry, died on September 7, 2020. His career, spanning more than 65 years, transformed statistical mechanics, many body physics, the study of chemistry, and the microscopic dynamics of fluids, by making atomistic computational simulation (in parallel with traditional theory and exper- iment) a new pathway to unexpected discoveries. Among his many honors, the CECAM prize, recognizing exceptional contributions to the simulation of the mi- croscopic properties of matter, is named for him. He was awarded the National Medal of Science by President Berni Julian Alder in 2015. Image credit: Lawrence Obama in 2008. Livermore National Laboratory. Alder was born to Ludwig Adler and Otillie n ´ee Gottschalk in Duisburg, Germany on September 9, sampling algorithm that was to revolutionize statistical 1925. Alder’s father Ludwig was a chemist who worked physics (1). Teller recruited Alder to the just-founded in the German aluminum industry. When the Nazis Lawrence Radiation Laboratory (later, the Lawrence Liv- came to power in 1933, Alder, his parents, elder ermore National Laboratory), where he, along with brother Henry, and twin brother Charles fled to Zurich, other young talented scientists, built a unique “can Switzerland. In 1941, they further emigrated to the do” scientific culture that thrives to this day. United States (becoming “Alders” in the process), Beginning in the mid-1950s, Alder, who possessed where they settled in Berkeley, California.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING 1991 in This Newsletter You Will Find: 1. Announcement and 2Nd
    NEWSLETTER - SPRING 1991 In this Newsletter you will find: 1. Announcement and 2nd Call for Papers for Physics Computing ’91 2. Announcement of the 14th International Conference on the Numerical Simulation of Plasmas 3. Announcement of the 4th International Conference on Computational Physics in Prague 4. In Memory of Sid Fernbach 5. Transition to Divisional Status Expected 6. Fellowship Nomination Process 7. Message from Chair 8. Other News Items 9. Roster of Executive Committee 10. Voting Instructions and Election Information PHYSICS COMPUTING ’91 including The 3rd International Conference on Computational Physics Announcement and Second Call for Papers The Topical Group on Computational Physics has combined forces with the editors of the AIP journal Computers in Physics to bring you a full week on the many aspects of the use of computers in physics including the traditional topics of computational physics. The meeting will convene on 10 June 1991 in the San Jose Convention Center and run through 14 June 1991. San Jose is located some 40 miles southeast of San Francisco at the south end of the San Francisco Bay, and is in the heart of “Silicon” Valley. The universities, national laboratories, and the large assortment of computer hardware and software companies in the region make San Jose an ideal venue for this meeting. The meeting program consists of plenary, oral, poster, and tutorial sessions, with many invited papers being given in the oral sessions. We are fortunate to have D. Allan Bromley, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, to give our Keynote Address. Our meeting format consists of several 90-minute sessions arranged such that the plenary sessions do not run in parallel with other sessions and with 3-hour poster sessions held in the exhibit hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Simulations and the Trading Zone
    PETER &A Computer Simulations and the Trading Zone At the root of most accounts of the development of science is the covert premise that science is about ontology: What objects are there? How do they interact? And how do we discover them? It is a premise that underlies three distinct epochs of inquiry into the nature of science. Among the positivists, the later Carnap explicitly advocated a view that the objects of physics would be irretrievably bound up with what he called a "framework," a full set of linguistic relations such as is found in Newtonian or Eiustcini;~mechanics. That these frameworks held little in common did not trouble Car- nap; prediction mattered more than progress. Kuhn molded this notion and gave it a more historical focus. Unlike the positivists, Kuhn and other commentators of the 1960's wanted to track the process by which a community abandoned one framework and adopted another. To more recent scholars, the Kuhnian categoriza- tion of group affiliation and disaffiliation was by and large correct, but its underlying dynamics were deemed deficient because they paid insufficient attention to the sociological forces that bound groups to their paradigms. All three generations embody the root assumption that the analysis of science studies (or ought to study) a science classified and divided according to the objects of its inquiry. All three assume that as these objects change, particular branches of science split into myriad disconnected parts. It is a view of scientific disunity that I will refer to as "framework relativism. 55 In this essay, as before, I will oppose this view, but not by Computer Simulations I 19 invoking the old positivist pipe dreams: no universal protocol languages, no physicalism, no Corntian hierarchy of knowledge, and no radical reductionism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Holocaust
    THE REAL HOLOCAUST "Hitler will have no war, but he will be forced into it, not this year but later..." Emil Ludwig [Jew], Les Annales, June 1934 "We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: 'Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.' I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under." -- Martin van Creveld, Israeli professor of military history at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem in an interview in the Dutch weekly magazine: Elsevier, 2002, no. 17, p. 52-53. "We may never actually have to use this atomic weapon in military operations as the mere threat of its use will persuade any opponent to surrender to us." –Chaim Weizmann [Jew] "Jews Declared War on Germany. Even before the war started, the Jewish leaders on a worldwide basis had years before, declared that world Jewry was at war with Germany, and that they would utilize their immense financial, moral, and political powers to destroy Hitler and Nazi Germany. Principal among these was Chaim Weizmann, the Zionist leader, who so declared on September 5, 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • Monte Carlo Simulation Techniques
    Monte Carlo Simulation Techniques Ji Qiang Accelerator Modeling Program Accelerator Technology & Applied Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CERN Accelerator School, Thessaloniki, Greece Nov. 13, 2018 Introduction: What is the Monte Carlo Method? • What is the Monte Carlo method? - Monte Carlo method is a (computational) method that relies on the use of random sampling and probability statistics to obtain numerical results for solving deterministic or probabilistic problems “…a method of solving various problems in computational mathematics by constructing for each problem a random process with parameters equal to the required quantities of that problem. The unknowns are determined approximately by carrying out observations on the random process and by computing its statistical characteristics which are approximately equal to the required parameters.” J. H. Halton, “A retrospective and prospective survey of the Monte Carlo Method,” SIAM Review, Vol. 12, No. 1 (1970). Introduction: What can the Monte Carlo Method Do? • Give an approximate solution to a problem that is too big, too hard, too irregular for deterministic mathematical approach • Two types of applications: a) The problems that are stochastic (probabilistic) by nature: - particle transport, - telephone and other communication systems, - population studies based on the statistics of survival and reproduction. b) The problems that are deterministic by nature: - the evaluation of integrals, - solving partial differential equations • It has been used in areas as diverse as physics, chemistry, material science, economics, flow of traffic and many others. Brief History of the Monte Carlo Method • 1772 Comte de Buffon - earliest documented use of random sampling to solve a mathematical problem (the probability of needle crossing parallel lines).
    [Show full text]
  • 50 MS10 Abstracts
    50 MS10 Abstracts IP1 because of physical requirements like objectivity and plas- Diffusion Generated Motion for Large Scale Simu- tic indifference. The latter leads to the multiplicative de- lations of Grain Growth and Recrystallization composition of the strain tensor and asks to consider the plastic tensor as elements of multiplicative matrix group, A polycrystalline material consists of many crystallites which leads to strong geometric nonlinearities. We show called grains that are differentiated by their varying ori- how polyconvexity and time-incremental minimization can entation. These materials are very common, including be used to establish global existence for elastoplastic evo- most metals and ceramics. The properties of the network lutionary systems. of grains making up these materials influence macroscale properties, such as strength and conductivity. Hence, un- Alexander Mielke derstanding the statistics of the grain network and how it Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics evolves is of great interest. We describe new, efficient nu- Berlin merical algorithms for simulating with high accuracy on [email protected] uniform grids the motion of grain boundaries in polycrys- tals. These algorithms are related to the level set method, but generate the desired geometric motion of a network IP4 of curves or surfaces (along with the appropriate bound- Gels and Microfluidic Devices ary conditions) by alternating two very simple operations for which fast algorithms already exist: Convolution with a Gels are materials that consist of a solid, crosslinked sys- kernel, and the construction of the signed distance function tem in a fluid solvent. They are over-whelmingly present to a set. Motions that can be treated with these algorithms in biological systems and also occur in many aspects of include grain growth under misorientation dependent sur- materials applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Nicolas C. Metropolis
    An Interview with NICOLAS C. METROPOLIS OH 135 Conducted by William Aspray on 29 May 1987 Los Alamos, NM Charles Babbage Institute The Center for the History of Information Processing University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Copyright, Charles Babbage Institute 1 Nicholas C. Metropolis Interview 29 May 1987 Abstract Metropolis, the first director of computing services at Los Alamos National Laboratory, discusses John von Neumann's work in computing. Most of the interview concerns activity at Los Alamos: how von Neumann came to consult at the laboratory; his scientific contacts there, including Metropolis, Robert Richtmyer, and Edward Teller; von Neumann's first hands-on experience with punched card equipment; his contributions to shock-fitting and the implosion problem; interactions between, and comparisons of von Neumann and Enrico Fermi; and the development of Monte Carlo techniques. Other topics include: the relationship between Turing and von Neumann; work on numerical methods for non-linear problems; and the ENIAC calculations done for Los Alamos. 2 NICHOLAS C. METROPOLIS INTERVIEW DATE: 29 May 1987 INTERVIEWER: William Aspray LOCATION: Los Alamos, NM ASPRAY: This is an interview on the 29th of May, 1987 in Los Alamos, New Mexico with Dr. Nicholas Metropolis. Why don't we begin by having you tell me something about when you first met von Neumann and what your relationship with him was over a period of time? METROPOLIS: Well, he first came to Los Alamos on the invitation of Dr. Oppenheimer. I don't remember quite when the date was that he came, but it was rather early on. It may have been the fall of 1943.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Mathematics on the ENIAC. Von Neumann's and Lehmer's
    Doing Mathematics on the ENIAC. Von Neumann's and Lehmer's different visions.∗ Liesbeth De Mol Center for Logic and Philosophy of Science University of Ghent, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Gent, Belgium [email protected] Abstract In this paper we will study the impact of the computer on math- ematics and its practice from a historical point of view. We will look at what kind of mathematical problems were implemented on early electronic computing machines and how these implementations were perceived. By doing so, we want to stress that the computer was in fact, from its very beginning, conceived as a mathematical instru- ment per se, thus situating the contemporary usage of the computer in mathematics in its proper historical background. We will focus on the work by two computer pioneers: Derrick H. Lehmer and John von Neumann. They were both involved with the ENIAC and had strong opinions about how these new machines might influence (theoretical and applied) mathematics. 1 Introduction The impact of the computer on society can hardly be underestimated: it affects almost every aspect of our lives. This influence is not restricted to ev- eryday activities like booking a hotel or corresponding with friends. Science has been changed dramatically by the computer { both in its form and in ∗The author is currently a postdoctoral research fellow of the Fund for Scientific Re- search { Flanders (FWO) and a fellow of the Kunsthochschule f¨urMedien, K¨oln. 1 its content. Also mathematics did not escape this influence of the computer. In fact, the first computer applications were mathematical in nature, i.e., the first electronic general-purpose computing machines were used to solve or study certain mathematical (applied as well as theoretical) problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Years of Quantum Monte Carlo (1): the Ground State
    The Early Years of Quantum Monte Carlo (1): the Ground State Michel Mareschal1,2, Physics Department, ULB , Bruxelles, Belgium Introduction In this article we shall relate the history of the implementation of the quantum many-body problem on computers, and, more precisely, the usage of random numbers to that effect, known as the Quantum Monte Carlo method. The probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics should have made it very natural to rely on the usage of (pseudo-) random numbers to solve problems in quantum mechanics, whenever an analytical solution is out of range. And indeed, very rapidly after the appearance of electronic machines in the late forties, several suggestions were made by the leading scientists of the time , - like Fermi, Von Neumann, Ulam, Feynman,..etc- which would reduce the solution of the Schrödinger equation to a stochastic or statistical problem which , in turn, could be amenable to a direct modelling on a computer. More than 70 years have now passed and it has been witnessed that, despite an enormous increase of the computing power available, quantum Monte Carlo has needed a long time and much technical progresses to succeed while numerical quantum dynamics mostly remains out of range at the present time. Using traditional methods for the implementation of quantum mechanics on computers has often proven inefficient, so that new algorithms needed to be developed. This is very much in contrast with what happened for classical systems. At the end of the fifties, the two main methods of classical molecular simulation, Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics, had been invented and an impressively rapid development was going to take place in the following years: this has been described in previous works [Mareschal,2018] [Battimelli,2018].
    [Show full text]
  • Newsline Year in Review 2020
    NEWSLINE YEAR IN REVIEW 2020 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY YELLOW LINKS ARE ACCESSIBLE ON THE LAB’S INTERNAL NETWORK ONLY. 1 BLUE LINKS ARE ACCESSIBLE ON BOTH THE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL LAB NETWORK. IT WAS AN EXCEPTIONAL YEAR, DESPITE RESTRICTIONS hough 2020 was dominated by events surrounding LLNL scientists released “Getting to Neutral: Options for the COVID pandemic — whether it was adapting Negative Carbon Emissions in California,” identifying a to social distancing and the need to telecommute, robust suite of technologies to help California clear the T safeguarding employees as they returned to last hurdle and become carbon neutral — and ultimately conduct mission-essential work or engaging in carbon negative — by 2045. COVID-related research — the Laboratory managed an exceptional year in all facets of S&T and operations. The Lab engineers and biologists developed a “brain-on-a- Lab delivered on all missions despite the pandemic and chip” device capable of recording the neural activity of its restrictions. living brain cell cultures in three dimensions, a significant advancement in the realistic modeling of the human brain The year was marked by myriad advances in high outside of the body. Scientists paired 3D-printed, living performance computing as the Lab moved closer to human brain vasculature with advanced computational making El Capitan and exascale computing a reality. flow simulations to better understand tumor cell attachment to blood vessels and developed the first living Lab researchers completed assembly and qualification 3D-printed aneurysm to improve surgical procedures and of 16 prototype high-voltage, solid state pulsed-power personalize treatments. drivers to meet the delivery schedule for the Scorpius radiography project.
    [Show full text]
  • Recipients of Major Scientific Awards a Descriptive And
    RECIPIENTS OF MAJOR SCIENTIFIC AWARDS A DESCRIPTIVE AND PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS by ANDREW CALVIN BARBEE DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Texas at Arlington December 16, 2016 Arlington, Texas Supervising Committee: James C. Hardy, Supervising Professor Casey Graham Brown John P. Connolly Copyright © by Andrew Barbee 2016 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. James Hardy for his willingness to serve on my committee when the university required me to restart the dissertation process. He helped me work through frustration, brainstorm ideas, and develop a meaningful study. Thank you to the other members of the dissertation committee, including Dr. Casey Brown and Dr. John Connolly. Also, I need to thank Andy Herzog with the university library. His willingness to locate needed resources, and provide insightful and informative research techniques was very helpful. I also want to thank Dr. Florence Haseltine with the RAISE project for communicating with me and sharing award data. And thank you, Dr. Hardy, for introducing me to Dr. Steven Bourgeois. Dr. Bourgeois has a gift as a teacher and is a humble and patient coach. I am thankful for his ability to stretch me without pulling a muscle. On a more personal note, I need to thank my father, Andy Barbee. He saw this day long before I did and encouraged me to pursue the doctorate. In addition, he was there during my darkest hour, this side of heaven, and I am eternally grateful for him. Thank you to our daughter Ana-Alicia.
    [Show full text]