DOCSLIB.ORG

The Meaning of Life in a Cosmological Perspective”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Meaning of Life in a Cosmological Perspective” THE BEGINNING AND THE END e Meaning of Life in a Cosmological Perspective CLÉMENT VIDAL 2 Dedication To every human, artificial or extraterrestrial intelligence in this universe. 3 Contents Dedication..................................................................................................3 Contents.....................................................................................................4 Preface - Psychiatry and Cosmological Speculation ............................8 Acknowledgements.................................................................................10 Abstract...................................................................................................13 Introduction............................................................................................14 Part I -Overview of Worldviews............................................................19 CHAPTER 1 - The Six Dimensions of Philosophy.............................................21 1.1 First-Order Questions....................................................................................21 1.2 Second-Order Questions...............................................................................23 1.3 Necessity to Have a Worldview....................................................................25 1.4 Implicit and Explicit Worldviews.................................................................26 1.5 A Cybernetic Model of a Worldview ...........................................................27 CHAPTER 2 - Criteria for Worldview Comparison..........................................29 2.1 A Quest for Criteria .....................................................................................30 2.1.1 The Philosophy of “Meta-” ............................................................................................................ 30 2.1.2 The Big Three................................................................................................................................. 30 2.1.3 Bootstrapping the Criteria.............................................................................................................. 32 2.1.4 Relativity, not Relativism............................................................................................................... 33 2.2 Criteria for Worldview Comparison.............................................................34 2.2.1 Objective Consistency.................................................................................................................... 35 2.2.2 Scientificity..................................................................................................................................... 35 2.2.3 Scope.............................................................................................................................................. 36 2.2.4 Subjective Consistency................................................................................................................... 39 2.2.5 Personal Utility............................................................................................................................... 39 2.2.6 Emotionality................................................................................................................................... 40 2.2.7 Intersubjective Consistency............................................................................................................ 43 2.2.8 Collective Utility............................................................................................................................ 43 2.2.9 Narrativity....................................................................................................................................... 44 2.3 Assessment Tests..........................................................................................45 2.3.1 Testing the Components................................................................................................................. 46 2.3.2 Testing the Dimensions................................................................................................................... 46 2.3.3 Testing the Big Three...................................................................................................................... 49 2.3.4 Summary......................................................................................................................................... 51 CHAPTER 3 - Religious, Scientific and Philosophical Worldviews.................53 3.1 Religious Worldviews...................................................................................53 3.1.1 Intelligent Design Versus Flying Spaghetti Monsterism................................................................ 53 3.1.2 Psychological and Societal Strengths of Religions........................................................................ 55 3.1.3 Failures of Tradition....................................................................................................................... 56 3.2 Scientific Worldviews...................................................................................57 3.2.1 Systems Theory as a Universal Language for Science................................................................... 57 3.2.2 Problem-Solving Approach............................................................................................................ 58 3.2.3 Universal Darwinism...................................................................................................................... 59 3.2.4 Limitations of Scientific Worldviews............................................................................................. 59 3.3 Philosophical Worldviews.............................................................................60 3.3.1 The Way to Philosophical Worldviews........................................................................................... 60 3.3.2 One or Several Worldviews?.......................................................................................................... 61 3.3.3 Analogies for Philosophical Worldviews....................................................................................... 62 3.3.4 Nonviolent Worldview Communication......................................................................................... 65 3.3.5 The Extreme Worldview Agenda................................................................................................... 67 Open Questions......................................................................................................69 4 Part II -The Beginning of the Universe................................................71 CHAPTER 4 - Origins of the Origin...................................................................73 4.1 Five Challenges for Ultimate Explanations..................................................74 4.1.1 Epistemological.............................................................................................................................. 74 4.1.2 Metaphysical................................................................................................................................... 76 4.1.3 Thermodynamical........................................................................................................................... 76 4.1.4 Causal............................................................................................................................................. 77 4.1.5 Infinity............................................................................................................................................ 77 4.2 The Point as a Cognitive Attractor................................................................77 4.2.1 Origin with Foundation.................................................................................................................. 78 4.2.2 Points in Everyday Life.................................................................................................................. 78 4.2.3 God's Point...................................................................................................................................... 79 4.2.4 Big Bang's Point............................................................................................................................. 79 4.3 The Cycle as a Cognitive Attractor...............................................................79 4.3.1 Origin without Foundation............................................................................................................. 80 4.3.2 Cycles in Everyday Life................................................................................................................. 80 4.3.3 Big Bang(s) Cycles ........................................................................................................................ 80 4.3.4 Objections against Cycles............................................................................................................... 81 4.4 Points, Cycles and Beyond...........................................................................84 4.4.1 More Attractors............................................................................................................................... 84 4.4.2 Line and Combinations................................................................................................................... 84 4.4.3 Cosmological Models....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cosmic Questions, Answers Pending
    special section | cosmic questions, Answers pending Cosmic questions, answers pending throughout human history, great missions of mission reveal the exploration have been inspired by curiosity, : the desire to find out about unknown realms. secrets of the universe such missions have taken explorers across wide oceans and far below their surfaces, THE OBJECTIVE deep into jungles, high onto mountain peaks For millennia, people have turned to the heavens in search of clues to nature’s mysteries. truth seekers from ages past to the present day and over vast stretches of ice to the earth’s have found that the earth is not the center of the universe, that polar extremities. countless galaxies dot the abyss of space, that an unknown form of today’s greatest exploratory mission is no matter and dark forces are at work in shaping the cosmos. Yet despite longer earthbound. it’s the scientific quest to these heroic efforts, big cosmological questions remain unresolved: explain the cosmos, to answer the grandest What happened before the Big Bang? ............................... Page 22 questions about the universe as a whole. What is the universe made of? ......................................... Page 24 what is the identity, for example, of the Is there a theory of everything? ....................................... Page 26 Are space and time fundamental? .................................... Page 28 “dark” ingredients in the cosmic recipe, com- What is the fate of the universe? ..................................... Page 30 posing 95 percent of the
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Chemistry
    Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Chemistry Jaap van Brakel Abstract: In this paper I assess the relation between philosophy of chemistry and (general) philosophy of science, focusing on those themes in the philoso- phy of chemistry that may bring about major revisions or extensions of cur- rent philosophy of science. Three themes can claim to make a unique contri- bution to philosophy of science: first, the variety of materials in the (natural and artificial) world; second, extending the world by making new stuff; and, third, specific features of the relations between chemistry and physics. Keywords : philosophy of science, philosophy of chemistry, interdiscourse relations, making stuff, variety of substances . 1. Introduction Chemistry is unique and distinguishes itself from all other sciences, with respect to three broad issues: • A (variety of) stuff perspective, requiring conceptual analysis of the notion of stuff or material (Sections 4 and 5). • A making stuff perspective: the transformation of stuff by chemical reaction or phase transition (Section 6). • The pivotal role of the relations between chemistry and physics in connection with the question how everything fits together (Section 7). All themes in the philosophy of chemistry can be classified in one of these three clusters or make contributions to general philosophy of science that, as yet , are not particularly different from similar contributions from other sci- ences (Section 3). I do not exclude the possibility of there being more than three clusters of philosophical issues unique to philosophy of chemistry, but I am not aware of any as yet. Moreover, highlighting the issues discussed in Sections 5-7 does not mean that issues reviewed in Section 3 are less im- portant in revising the philosophy of science.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmos - Before the Big Bang
    From issue 2601 of New Scientist magazine, 28 April 2007, page 28-33 The cosmos - before the big bang How did the universe begin? The question is as old as humanity. Sure, we know that something like the big bang happened, but the theory doesn't explain some of the most important bits: why it happened, what the conditions were at the time, and other imponderables. Many cosmologists think our standard picture of how the universe came to be is woefully incomplete or even plain wrong, and they have been dreaming up a host of strange alternatives to explain how we got here. For the first time, they are trying to pin down the initial conditions of the big bang. In particular, they want to solve the long-standing mystery of how the universe could have begun in such a well- ordered state, as fundamental physics implies, when it seems utter chaos should have reigned. Several models have emerged that propose intriguing answers to this question. One says the universe began as a dense sea of black holes. Another says the big bang was sparked by a collision between two membranes floating in higher-dimensional space. Yet another says our universe was originally ripped from a larger entity, and that in turn countless baby universes will be born from the wreckage of ours. Crucially, each scenario makes unique and testable predictions; observations coming online in the next few years should help us to decide which, if any, is correct. Not that modelling the origin of the universe is anything new.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmic Calendar
    The Cosmic Calendar Astronomers believe that the Cosmos in which the Solar System and Earth resides is about 16 billion years old. We believe the Earth is about 4.6 billion years old and base this on carbon dating of rocks both from Earth and the Moon. However, billions of years is a very hard thing to grasp! Fortunately there is a creative way to get a grasp on this kind of time and that is with the "cosmic calendar" which Carl Sagan created and popularized. We set the Big Bang on January 1st and divided the events into one year, with now being the first day of the next new year. Before you read further, take a guess at which month humans enter into the calendar! The first stars and galaxies did not begin to form until the universe had cooled and expanded. Our Milky Way galaxy comes into existence on May 1st of our calendar. Our Solar System forms September 9th and the Earth on September 14th. The "infant" Earth was a hot, molten and toxic place, nothing like the paradise we know today. As Earth cooled, the first rocks solidified on October 2nd. The oldest known fossils, nothing more complex than bacteria and blue­green algae, appear October 9th on our cosmic calendar. These early life forms reproduced by splitting cells. Sexes did not begin as a means of reproduction until about November first. The most basic plants which used photosynthesis to get energy, appear on November 12th. The first cells with nuclei, eukaryotes, appear on November 15th, and begin to flourish immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • Existence in Physics
    Existence in Physics Armin Nikkhah Shirazi ∗ University of Michigan, Department of Physics, Ann Arbor January 24, 2019 Abstract This is the second in a two-part series of papers which re-interprets relativistic length contraction and time dilation in terms of concepts argued to be more fundamental, broadly construed to mean: concepts which point to the next paradigm. After refining the concept of existence to duration of existence in spacetime, this paper introduces a criterion for physi- cal existence in spacetime and then re-interprets time dilation in terms of the concept of the abatement of an object’s duration of existence in a given time interval, denoted as ontochronic abatement. Ontochronic abatement (1) focuses attention on two fundamental spacetime prin- ciples the significance of which is unappreciated under the current paradigm, (2) clarifies the state of existence of speed-of-light objects, and (3) leads to the recognition that physical existence is an equivalence relation by absolute dimensionality. These results may be used to justify the incorporation of the physics-based study of existence into physics as physical ontology. Keywords: Existence criterion, spacetime ontic function, ontochronic abatement, invariance of ontic value, isodimensionality, ontic equivalence class, areatime, physical ontology 1 Introduction This is the second in a two-part series of papers which re-interprets relativistic length contraction and time dilation in terms of concepts argued to be more fundamental, broadly construed to mean: concepts which point to the next paradigm. The first paper re-conceptualized relativistic length contraction in terms of dimensional abatement [1], and this paper will re-conceptualize relativistic time dilation in terms of what I will call ontochronic abatement, to be defined as the abatement of an object’s duration of existence within a given time interval.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Aquinas: Soul-Body Connection and the Afterlife Hyde Dawn Krista University of Missouri-St
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Theses Graduate Works 4-16-2012 Thomas Aquinas: Soul-Body Connection and the Afterlife Hyde Dawn Krista University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Krista, Hyde Dawn, "Thomas Aquinas: Soul-Body Connection and the Afterlife" (2012). Theses. 261. http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis/261 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thomas Aquinas: Soul-Body Connection and the Afterlife Krista Hyde M.L.A., Washington University in St. Louis, 2010 B.A., Philosophy, Southeast Missouri State University – Cape Girardeau, 2003 A Thesis Submitted to The Graduate School at the University of Missouri – St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Philosophy April 2012 Advisory Committee Gualtiero Piccinini, Ph.D. Chair Jon McGinnis, Ph.D. John Brunero, Ph.D. Copyright, Krista Hyde, 2012 Abstract Thomas Aquinas nearly succeeds in addressing the persistent problem of the mind-body relationship by redefining the human being as a body-soul (matter-form) composite. This redefinition makes the interaction problem of substance dualism inapplicable, because there is no soul “in” a body. However, he works around the mind- body problem only by sacrificing an immaterial afterlife, as well as the identity and separability of the soul after death. Additionally, Thomistic psychology has difficulty accounting for the transmission of universals, nor does it seem able to overcome the arguments for causal closure.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Cosmology of the Big Rip: Within GR and in a Modified Theory of Gravity
    universe Conference Report Quantum Cosmology of the Big Rip: Within GR and in a Modified Theory of Gravity Mariam Bouhmadi-López 1,2,*, Imanol Albarran 3,4 and Che-Yu Chen 5,6 1 Department of Theoretical Physics, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, P.O. Box 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain 2 IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48011 Bilbao, Spain 3 Departamento de Física, Universidade da Beira Interior, Rua Marquês D’Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal; [email protected] 4 Centro de Matemática e Aplicações da Universidade da Beira Interior (CMA-UBI), Rua Marquês D’Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal 5 Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, 10617 Taipei, Taiwan; [email protected] 6 LeCosPA, National Taiwan University, 10617 Taipei, Taiwan * Correspondence: [email protected] Academic Editors: Mariusz P. D ˛abrowski, Manuel Krämer and Vincenzo Salzano Received: 8 March 2017; Accepted: 12 April 2017; Published: 14 April 2017 Abstract: Quantum gravity is the theory that is expected to successfully describe systems that are under strong gravitational effects while at the same time being of an extreme quantum nature. When this principle is applied to the universe as a whole, we use what is commonly named “quantum cosmology”. So far we do not have a definite quantum theory of gravity or cosmology, but we have several promising approaches. Here we will review the application of the Wheeler–DeWitt formalism to the late-time universe, where it might face a Big Rip future singularity. The Big Rip singularity is the most virulent future dark energy singularity which can happen not only in general relativity but also in some modified theories of gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Philosophy. Social Studies--Language Arts: 6414.16. INSTITUTION Dade County Public Schools, Miami, Fla
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 086 604 SO 006 822 AUTHOR Norris, Jack A., Jr. TITLE Introduction to Philosophy. Social Studies--Language Arts: 6414.16. INSTITUTION Dade County Public Schools, Miami, Fla. PUB DATE 72 NOTE 20p.; Authorized Course of Instruction for the Quinmester Program EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS Course Objectives; Curriculum Guides; Grade 10; Grade 11; Grade 12; *Language Arts; Learnin4 Activities; *Logic; Non Western Civilization; *Philosophy; Resource Guides; Secondary Grades; *Social Studies; *Social Studies Units; Western Civilization IDENTIFIERS *Quinmester Program ABSTRACT Western and non - western philosophers and their ideas are introduced to 10th through 12th grade students in this general social studies Quinmester course designed to be used as a preparation for in-depth study of the various schools of philosophical thought. By acquainting students with the questions and categories of philosophy, a point of departure for further study is developed. Through suggested learning activities the meaning of philosopky is defined. The Socratic, deductive, inductive, intuitive and eclectic approaches to philosophical thought are examined, as are three general areas of philosophy, metaphysics, epistemology,and axiology. Logical reasoning is applied to major philosophical questions. This course is arranged, as are other quinmester courses, with sections on broad goals, course content, activities, and materials. A related document is ED 071 937.(KSM) FILMED FROM BEST AVAILABLE COPY U S DEPARTMENT EDUCATION OF HEALTH. NAT10N41
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C
    Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C. T. Geppert FLEETING CITIES Imperial Expositions in Fin-de-Siècle Europe Co-Edited EUROPEAN EGO-HISTORIES Historiography and the Self, 1970–2000 ORTE DES OKKULTEN ESPOSIZIONI IN EUROPA TRA OTTO E NOVECENTO Spazi, organizzazione, rappresentazioni ORTSGESPRÄCHE Raum und Kommunikation im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert NEW DANGEROUS LIAISONS Discourses on Europe and Love in the Twentieth Century WUNDER Poetik und Politik des Staunens im 20. Jahrhundert Imagining Outer Space European Astroculture in the Twentieth Century Edited by Alexander C. T. Geppert Emmy Noether Research Group Director Freie Universität Berlin Editorial matter, selection and introduction © Alexander C. T. Geppert 2012 Chapter 6 (by Michael J. Neufeld) © the Smithsonian Institution 2012 All remaining chapters © their respective authors 2012 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2012 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Ontology, Epistemology and Axiology on Management
    The Second International Conference on Entrepreneurship STUDY OF ONTOLOGY, EPISTEMOLOGY AND AXIOLOGY ON MANAGEMENT Rahmat Setiawan1 Airlangga University, Surabaya INDONESIA Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT There is still a difference of opinion among experts in the field of management of what is meant by management, namely whether the management is a science, an art or a profession. In addition, the management theory and studies have also experienced rapid growth, especially until the 19th century until the present. These developments have given rise to various groups of schools of thought about the management, which is a group of classical management perspective, a group of behavior management perspective, and a group of quantitative management perspective. Therefore, it is necessary to study on the development of management in terms of the philosophy of science perspective. By doing this assessment, management will be studied ontological, epistemological and axiological. Ontologically, management is the science, art and profession of work done through others. Material object is a behavior management work done through others. In management development, ontologically most experts view reality of social management in management as something objective, not subjective. Epistemologically, in management development, the approach most widely used by management experts is a deductive approach. However, the trend also shows that the inductive approach is also widely used lately. In axiological, largely through the efforts of study and research in the development of management is not value-free because the paradigm used by most bear management experts in developing management are positivist or functionalist paradigm. However, in applying the results of research to take a policy, then the leader of the company must still pay attention to the values of ethics and humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparativeurban Studies Project
    COMPARATIVE URBAN STUDIES PROJECT URBAN UPDATE September 2007 NO. 12 Cities and Fundamentalisms WRITTEN BY: Nezar AlSayyad, Professor of Architecture, Planning, and Urban History & Chair of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies, University of California at Berkeley; Mejgan Massoumi, Program Assistant, Comparative Urban Studies Project (2005-2007); Mrinalini Rajagopalan, Assistant Professor, Draper Faculty Fellow (The City), New York University. With the unanticipated resur- gence of religious and ethnic loy- alties across the world, commu- nities are returning to, reinvigo- rating, and giving new meaning to religions and their common practices. Islam, Christianity, Judaism, and Hinduism, among others, are experiencing new in- fl uxes of commitments and tra- ditions. These changes have been coupled with the breakdown of order and of state power under the neo-liberal economic para- Top Row, Left to Right: Salwa Ismail, Mrinalini Rajagopalan, Raka Ray, Blair Ruble, Renu Desai, Nezar AlSayyad. Bottom Row, Left to Right: digm of civil society which have Omri Elisha, Emily Gottreich, Mona Harb, Mejgan Massoumi. created vacuums in the provi- sion of social services. Religious groups in many countries around the world are increasingly providing those services left unattended to by state bureaucracies. The once sacred divide between church and COMPARATIVE URBAN STUDIES PROJECT state or the confi nement of religion to the pri- fundamentalisms in several parts of the world. The vate sphere is now being vigorously challenged systematic transformation of the urban landscape as radical religious groups not only gain ground through various strategies of religious funda- within sovereign nation-states but in fact forge mentalism has led to the redefi nition of minority enduring and powerful transnational connections space in many cities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmos and Theological Reflection: the Priority of Self-Transcendence Paul Allen
    Document generated on 09/30/2021 12:09 p.m. Théologiques The Cosmos and Theological Reflection: The Priority of Self-Transcendence Paul Allen Les cosmologies Article abstract Volume 9, Number 1, printemps 2001 In this article, I argue that the primary significance of cosmology for theology is through a notion of self-transcendence. It is an inherently theological notion URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/005683ar arising within cosmology. It points to the realm of interiority claimed by DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/005683ar contemporary theology. Employing the thought of Ernan McMullin in particular, I claim that self-transcendence emerges within cosmological See table of contents inquiry when it becomes philosophy, and when extrapolation is involved. A theological thrust to cosmology is confirmed when one understands the limits of cosmology as an empirical discipline amidst the existential questions that can be posed about the meaning of the universe, a development well illustrated Publisher(s) by the anthropic principle. Faculté de théologie de l'Université de Montréal ISSN 1188-7109 (print) 1492-1413 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Allen, P. (2001). The Cosmos and Theological Reflection: The Priority of Self-Transcendence. Théologiques, 9(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.7202/005683ar Tous droits réservés © Faculté de théologie de l’Université de Montréal, 2001 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit.
    [Show full text]