Using CEQA to Protect Your Community

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Using CEQA to Protect Your Community Using CEQA to Protect Your Community A brief guide to the California Environmental Quality Act Did You Know? Your Community Has a Right to Know & Act What Is the California ways of reducing these impacts are Environmental Quality Act? developed through a public partici- Have you, or has some- pation process in which the views of one you know, had to The California Environmental Qual- neighborhood residents must be tak- leave your home or ity Act, or“CEQA”(pronounced“SEE- en into account. seen a favorite gather- quah”), was passed in 1970. CEQA de- ing place demolished clares it state policy to“develop and Would new buildings result in more cars on the streets, increased con- to make way for new maintain a high-quality environment now and in the future, and to take gestion, and air pollution? Would development? What all action necessary to protect, re- the project tear down a historically places mattered to habilitate, and enhance the environ- significant building? CEQA gives you you that are no longer mental quality of the state.”It helps and your neighbors the right to have there? safeguard the natural environment your voices heard when decisions as well as historic places that you and about a proposed project are being other members of the community made. CEQA does have limitations, Did you know that you can do consider too important to tear down. however, and it does not guarantee something about this? CEQA is the primary legal tool used that a historic building will be saved. in California to protect historic sites Many people have seen the destruc- threatened with demolition. tion of historic neighborhoods and sites without knowing that their voice At its simplest, CEQA requires This booklet offers basic could have made a difference. You a report to the public (called information about CEQA and have a say in how your community an“E I R”or“environmental impact how you can use it to empower, changes over time. There is a state report”) describing how a proposed protect, and enhance your law that gives you the right to know development project would affect community. The examples about development projects in your the quality of life of communities, show how various communities neighborhood and how they affect including our basic rights to clean have used it in different ways. your community. Known as the Cali- air, toxic-free buildings, ease of traf- It is important to note that this fornia Environmental Quality Act, fic, and cultural heritage. It requires is only one strategy to consider this law gives you a voice in the pro- our government agencies to avoid or in your overall plan—one tool cess and tools to help you protect minimize those impacts to the extent in your toolbox. But it is an important places, your quality of life, feasible by examining alternative ap- important one. and the future of your neighborhood. proaches to the project. The specific At left: CEQA helps protect desig- nated landmarks such as the historic bridges spanning the Los Angeles River, including the North Broadway Bridge (foreground) and the North Spring Street Viaduct. Photo by Kevin Break. 1 Why Care? Understanding CEQA Understanding CEQA and apply- ing it to your organizing strategy can help you prevent the destruc- tion of important landmarks in your community. You can help save a historic building or cultural space, protect your historic home, and actively participate in land use decisions that affect the qual- ity of life in your neighborhood. Historic buildings and neighbor- hoods serve as tangible links to our history and our collective memories. Because many cultural centers, residences, and small businesses occupy older build- ings, preserving these spaces also maintains important anchors and services for the community. Losses That Might Have Been opposing the 710 Freeway extension Prevented if CEQA Had Been through El Sereno, South Pasadena, in Place and Pasadena. In this case, CEQA was used in conjunction with federal en- With the postwar construction of vironmental laws to halt the destruc- freeways that crisscross Los Angeles, tion of almost 1,000 homes and the entire neighborhoods in East L.A., division of four nationally recognized Boyle Heights, and elsewhere were historic districts. paved over, divided, and destroyed. In the 1960s, before the passage of In 1973, the City of South Pasadena CEQA, the construction of the East obtained an injunction prohibiting Los Angeles Interchange in Boyle the California Department of Trans- Heights isolated neighborhoods, portation (Caltrans) from building the Above: The 1927 McKinley Building displaced 10,000 people, and de- extension until an environmental im- on Wilshire Boulevard was demol- pact report (EIR) was properly com- ished in 1998, erasing an important molished 29,000 homes. At the time, link to the community’s past. Photo community members protested, pleted. Another injunction resulted from L.A. Conservancy archives. wrote letters to their councilmember, from a 1999 lawsuit filed by the Na- attended meetings, formed commit- tional Trust for Historic Preservation, Top right: The Granados family home the City of South Pasadena, and a in El Sereno, one of nearly 1,000 tees, and demonstrated in the streets. homes threatened with demolition Despite their pleas, the project went coalition of community and pres- for the 710 Freeway extension. Photo forward. It is now the busiest freeway ervation groups. As a result of this courtesy Friezer Photography for the interchange in the United States. broad-based call for an alternative to National Trust for Historic Preserva- demolition, Caltrans and the Federal tion. Today, CEQA helps safeguard com- Highway Administration are still ex- munities by giving residents legal ploring sensitive approaches to the tools to protect their neighbor- project. hoods. A good example of this is the decades-long grassroots campaign 2 How It Works: The Environmental Impact Report CEQA requires that project impacts on historical resources be recognized A Different Strategy: and considered by the city, county, Negotiating with the state, or other governmental agen- Developer cy (the“lead agency”) responsible for approving a project that could In some cases, the developer can destroy or otherwise adversely af- be convinced to change its proj- fect these resources. In some cases, ect or sell the property, especially the lead agency determines that the in the face of well-organized com- munity opposition. Community project will not have negative en- activists can help by bringing for- vironmental impacts or that its im- ward potential buyers committed pacts can be avoided by requiring What Is a Historical Resource? to reusing the site in a way that the developer to meet certain con- is consistent with the needs of ditions, or“mitigation measures.”If In order to take full advantage of legal the community. You can also ask the project poses significant environ- protections under CEQA, it is essential your City Council representative mental impacts that cannot easily be to first establish the significance of or County Supervisor to convene and mediate discussions between avoided, an environmental impact the building being threatened. To report (EIR) is prepared. the community and the develop- automatically qualify as a“historical er. If the EIR does not comply with resource”under CEQA, and trigger CEQA, a viable lawsuit may be the The EIR is considered the heart of the requirement for an EIR, any build- last chance to prevent demolition. CEQA, providing the public and deci- ing targeted for demolition must be: Efforts to work with the developer sion makers with an in-depth review (1) listed or determined eligible for can significantly strengthen your of a project’s environmental impacts listing in the National Register of His- position. and feasible alternatives that would toric Places or the California Register reduce those impacts. The EIR pro- of Historical Resources; or (2) listed in On rare but noteworthy occa- cess is the best opportunity for a city register of historic landmarks. sions, local residents have worked members of the public to promote with the developer and garnered However, a resource does not have enough financial support to buy alternatives to demolition. If an EIR to be officially designated in order studies a feasible alternative to de- the property and adapt the space to trigger the requirement for an EIR to continue serving the commu- molition, the lead agency may be re- under CEQA. nity. quired to change the project to reduce its impact on historical resources. This is where your role is so im- portant. If a building threatened with demolition is not already listed in a historic register, members of the public must convince local officials Top photo: The preservation of the Michael White Adobe (circa 1845) in that it qualifies as historic and is wor- San Marino was supported by the thy of protection. Community activ- community when it was threatened ists need to research the site; share with demolition in 2008. Photo by your stories; and submit documenta- L.A. Conservancy staff. tion, photos, and expert testimony Bottom photo: The Self Help Graph- early in the environmental review ics & Art Building houses a thriving process to show why the building is cultural center for Chicana/o art in significant and meets local or state the heart of unincorporated East Los requirements for historic status. Angeles. Photo by Edgar Garcia. 3 What You Can Do Document the history of the Prepare a landmark nomination. Monterey County Jail building. Is the building a signifi- In cities with a historic preservation cant gathering place for the com- ordinance, buildings that have been In December 1970, legendary munity? Does it have artistic, cul- listed as city landmarks automatically labor leader Cesar Chavez was tural, or architectural value? Did an trigger review under CEQA and other detained for twenty days at the important event happen there? Talk protections under local law.
Recommended publications
  • 32Nd Annual California Preservation Design Awards
    32ND ANNUAL CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION DESIGN AWARDS OCTOBER 2, 2015 JULIA MORGAN BALLROOM, MERCHANTS EXCHANGE BUILDING SAN FRANCISCO The Board of Trustees of the California Preservation Foundation welcomes you to the Preservation Design Awards Ceremony Friday, October 2, 2015 Julia Morgan Ballroom, Merchants Exchange Building, San Francisco 6:00 pm Cocktail Reception and Dinner 7:30 pm Welcome Kelly Sutherlin McLeod, FAIA President, Board of Trustees California Preservation Foundation Cindy L. Heitzman, Executive Director, California Preservation Foundation Awards Presentations Presentation of the President’s Award for Lifetime Acheivement John F. Merritt Presentation of the 32nd Annual Preservation Design Awards Kurt Schindler, FAIA, Jury Chair Amy Crain Jeff Greene Leo Marmol, FAIA Chuck Palley Jay Reiser, S.E. Annual Sponsors Cornerstone Spectra Company Cornice Architectural Resources Group IS Architecture Cody Anderson Wasney Architects, Inc. Kelly Sutherlin McLeod Architecture, Inc. EverGreene Architectural Arts Kitson Contracting, Inc. Garavaglia Architecture Page & Turnbull GPA Consulting Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, Inc. Historic Resources Group Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. Holmes Culley/Holmes Fire 2 Preservation Design Awards 2015 Preservation Design Awards Sponsors Pillar Kelly Sutherlin McLeod Architecture, Inc. Plant Construction Marmol Radziner Plath and Company, Inc. Supporting AC Martin MATT Construction Corporation Cody | Brock Commercial Builders Rinne & Peterson Structural Engineers Cody Anderson Wasney Architects, Inc. Vallier Design Associates Leddy Maytum Stacy Architects Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. Nonprofit Fort Mason Center 3 Preservation Design Awards 2015 2015 Awards Jury Kurt Schindler, FAIA, LEED AP Principal, ELS Architecture and Urban Design | Awards Chair and PDA Jury Chair Kurt Schindler is a principal at ELS and directs the firm’s historic and seismic renovation projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyvernwood Garden Apartments Has Fostered a Strong Sense of Community Among Its 6,000 Residents
    Volume 33 m a r a p r 2 0 1 1 Number 2 Last Remaining Seats Turns 25! Member ticket sales start March 30 Celebrate a quarter century of classic films and live entertainment in the historic theatres of Los Angeles! The 25th Annual Last Remaining Seats series takes place May 25 through June 29. You will receive a large postcard in the mail this year in lieu of a brochure; you can find all the details and order tickets starting March 30 at laconservancy.org. We were finalizing the schedule at press time; it should be online by the time you receive this newsletter. In addition to the six Wednesday evening screenings, this special season will include a bonus Fan Favorite film (Sunset Boulevard, Despite its vast size, Wyvernwood Garden Apartments has fostered a strong sense of community among its 6,000 residents. Clockwise from top left: Historic view of the complex (Security Pacific Collection/Los Angeles Public selected by you, our members!). It will screen Library); current residents (Jesus Hermosillo); a resident sends a message (Evangelina Garza); teenager Juan twice (matinee and evening shows) at the Pal- Bucio’s depiction of what Wyvernwood means to him; young residents (Molly Mills). ace Theatre on Sunday, June 26, a hundred years to the day after it opened! We’ll be at the Wyvernwood Garden Apartments: Palace as part of a broader celebration of the centennial of several theatres on Broadway. Remember to take part in our 2011 mem- Community by Design bership drive for your chance to win VIP by Cindy Olnick and Karina Muñiz tickets to a Last Remaining Seats screening.
    [Show full text]
  • Raise a Glass to History—Before It's Too Late
    NEWS Jan/Feb 2018 • Volume 40 Number 1 Celebrate 40 Years of Preservation Happy Anniversary! This year marks forty years since the Conservancy’s founding in 1978. The staff, volunteers, and members of the Conservancy have made a significant impact in preserving the historic places that make L.A. County unique. Thank you! Anniversaries are great times for reflec- tion, and we have much to celebrate. Yet this is also a time to redouble our efforts and renew our commitment. What will Los An- geles look like forty years from now? How will we make sure that future includes the best of our past? The Conservancy won a $150,000 grant to help rehabilitate the famed Formosa Café in West Hollywood. Legacy We’ll mark this milestone throughout bars and restaurants like the Formosa are exceedingly rare, threatened by development pressure, rising rents, the year in various ways, from special events changing demographics, and other factors. Photo by Douglas Hill, courtesy National Trust for Historic Preservation. and newsletter features to new initiatives. As always, for the latest news, join us on social Raise a Glass to History—Before It’s Too Late media and subscribe to our email newsletters. by Cindy Olnick This anniversary is as much yours as If you’re one of the many people who voted for the Formosa Café in last fall’s Partners anyone’s, since your membership makes this in Preservation campaign, thank you! Created by the National Trust for Historic Preserva- work possible. If you have a personal story tion and American Express, Partners in Preservation awards preservation funding to projects to share—about the Conservancy or historic across the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources November 2019 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTORS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Related Contexts and Evaluation Considerations 1 Other Sources for Military Historic Contexts 3 MILITARY INSTITUTIONS AND ACTIVITIES HISTORIC CONTEXT 3 Historical Overview 3 Los Angeles: Mexican Era Settlement to the Civil War 3 Los Angeles Harbor and Coastal Defense Fortifications 4 The Defense Industry in Los Angeles: From World War I to the Cold War 5 World War II and Japanese Forced Removal and Incarceration 8 Recruitment Stations and Military/Veterans Support Services 16 Hollywood: 1930s to the Cold War Era 18 ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS FOR AIR RAID SIRENS 20 ATTACHMENT A: FALLOUT SHELTER LOCATIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities PREFACE These “Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities” (Guidelines) were developed based on several factors. First, the majority of the themes and property types significant in military history in Los Angeles are covered under other contexts and themes of the citywide historic context statement as indicated in the “Introduction” below. Second, many of the city’s military resources are already designated City Historic-Cultural Monuments and/or are listed in the National Register.1 Finally, with the exception of air raid sirens, a small number of military-related resources were identified as part of SurveyLA and, as such, did not merit development of full narrative themes and eligibility standards.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.Edinburgh Bungalow Court Final.Pdf
    EDINBURGH BUNGALOW COURT 750 – 756 ½ N. Edinburgh CHC-2015-3386-HCM ENV-2015-3387-CE Agenda packet includes 1. Final Staff Recommendation Report 2. Categorical Exemption 3. Director's Initation of Nomination 4. Nomination 5. Information Submitted by Property Owner 6. Letters in Support of Designation Please click on each document to be directly taken to the corresponding page of the PDF. Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC-2015-3386-HCM ENV-2015-3387-CE HEARING DATE: November 19, 2015 Location: 750 – 756 ½ N. Edinburgh Avenue TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 5 PLACE: City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Hollywood 200 N. Spring Street Area Planning Commission: Central Los Angeles, CA Neighborhood Council: Mid City West 90012 Legal Description: TR 4891, Lot 101and 102 PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the EDINBURGH BUNGALOW COURT REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER(S): BLDG Edinburgh, LLC c/o Guy Penini 755 N. Laurel Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90046 APPLICANT: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning 200 N. Spring Street, Room 559 Los Angeles, CA 90012 PREPARER: Katie E. Horak and Jennifer Trotoux Architectural Resources Group, Inc. 8 Mills Place, #300 Pasadena, CA 91105 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Declare the subject property a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.7. 2. Adopt the staff report and findings. MICHAEL J. LOGRANDE Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Lambert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation. Updated July 2014. MLA 6Th Edition. Paul Revere Williams Project
    Historic Preservation. Updated July 2014. MLA 6th edition. Paul Revere Williams Project. Art Museum of the University of Memphis. "$1.1 Million Donated to Community Theater (Lear Theater)." Reno Gazette-Journal (1997): 1. "2004 Eleven most endangered (La Concha." Preserve Nevada. 2008. 5/6/2008 <http://preservenevada.unlv.edu>. Abercrombie, Brooke, and Irmina Kobylko. "Where Williams Walked: Pasadena Architect James V. Coane Leaves an Invisible Footprint on His Renovation of a 1928 Spanish Colonial Estate Designed by Los Angeles' Renowned Architect to the Stars." Pasadena Weekly April 1 2009: 5. 4/28/09 <http://pasadenaweekly.com/cms/story/detail/wh...>. "African-American Historical Site may Face the Wrecking Ball." The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education.46 (2004/2005): 52. "Ambassador Hotel Saga Ends: LA Conservancy Moves on." Forum News: National Trust for Historic Preservation XIV.5 (2008): 8. "Ambassador Hotel Updates." Los Angeles Conservancy: Preservation Issues.February (2004): 1/30/2008. google. 1/30/2008 <http://www.laconservancy.org/issues/ambassador-dec.php4>. Anderson, Lisa. "Historic Preservation--Las Vegas Style: A Masterpiece of Motel Architecture from the Era of the Rat Pack is being Preserved (La Concha)." Chicago Tribune December 21 2006. Gale: General OneFile Print. 4/24/2009 <http://find.galegroup.com>. "Los Angeles Airport Theme Building is Designated Landmark." Historic Preservation News 33.3 (1993): 4. "Los Angeles' Newest Historic-Cultural Monuments (Castera 2007)." City of Los Angles, Department of City Planning. Office of Historic Resources 2.1 (2008): 5-6. "Los Angeles' Newest Historic-Cultural Monuments (St. Philip HCM 988)." City of Los Angeles, Department of City Planning: Office of Historic Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) on March 7, 2017 for a Historic Evaluation for the Scope of Work
    CITY OF VENTURA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE - Agenda Item: 2 Hearing Date: May 23, 2018 Project No: 11427 Case No: H RA-3-17-39567 ---~-----·-~-·-~- --- Applicant: Andrew Langroudi I Ventura Solar Properties LLC Planner: ~v Don Nielsen, Associate Planner, (805) 677-3959 ~ Dave Ward, AICP, Planning Manager Location: 250 South Mills Road (Attachment A) AP N: 079-0-1 01-300 Recommendation: 1. Discuss the property owner's intended use of the building and how to approach exterior and interior modifications to the building; and 2. Encourage the property owner to submit a local Historic Landmark Designation application and consider filing an application to list the building on the National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historic Places. Zoning: Limited Commercial (C-1) & Intermediate Commercial (C-1A) Land Use: Commerce Regulatory Review: SBMC Sec. 2.4.30.130 & 2R.450.220 Environmental Review: CEQA Guidelines Section 15306 - Information Collection PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a Historic Resources Assessment for the review of a Phase 1 Historical Resources Report for a 14, 112 square foot, two story office building and associated parking garage, built in 1965, on a 2.00 acre property located at 250 South Mills Road in the Limited Commercial (C-1) & Intermediate Commercial (C-1A) zone districts with a land use designation of Comme.rce. The project site is not located next to any recognized landmarks, or points of interests or within a historic district. PROJ-11427 HPC/05/23/18/DN Page 1 of 4 HPC - 1 BACKGROUND On March 3, 2017, the Planning Division was notified of construction activity at the subjectsite; no construction or demolition permits were issued.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER 1996 Preservation
    VOLUME 21, No.3 CALIFORNIA SUMMER 1996 Preservation A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION FOUNDATION L.A.C. scores wins in St. Vibiana 's fight The Los Angeles Conservancy has run worked for more than a year to convince up a string of legal victories in its battle him to save the 1876 church by having it to save St. Vibiana's Cathedral. The serve another purpose within the proposed Catholic Archdiocese and the City of cathedral complex. The Archdiocese, This issue: Los Angeles, however, seem intent on however, has pledges of $45 million demolishing the 120 year-old city (continued on page 8) 2 Cal. Register monument, even though Cardinal Roger update ·· Mahony has announced he will not San Jose conference build his $45 million replacement 4 draws 400; Bill Delvac Preservationist cathedral on the site of the current of the Year P.O.Y. church. It is a fight that has split the honored as community and set a dangerous 10 Legislative An afternoon surfing the Internet, a sold-out precedent for bypassing local ·. upaates Public Art Controversy tour, a participative preservation ordinances and state economic development charrette, and tracks environmental laws. 12 Annual on Preservation Planning and Strategies for St. Vibiana's was built in 1876 as an conference Success were just some of the highlights of supporters expression of faith in the city's future CPF's 21st Annual Preservation Conference and its growth from pueblo to held May 30-June 2 in San Jose. More than metropolis, says L.A. Conservancy 400 preservationists attended the conference Executive Director Linda and were on hand to honor six President's Dishman.
    [Show full text]
  • Chc-2020-3767-Hcm Env-2020-3768-Ce
    Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC-2020-3767-HCM ENV-2020-3768-CE HE ARING DATE: July 16, 2020 Location: 2841-2849 North Avenel Street TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 4 – Ryu PLACE : Teleconference (see Community Plan Area: Hollywood agenda for login Area Planning Commission: Central information) Neighborhood Council: Silver Lake Legal Description: Ivanhoe Tract, Block 10, Lots 32-34 EXPIRATION DATE: The original 30-day expiration date of July 19, 2020 per Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 22.171.10(e)1 is tolled, and a revised date will be determined pursuant to the Mayor’s March 21, 2020 Public Order Under City of Los Angeles Emergency Authority re: Tolling of Deadlines Prescribed in the Municipal Code and April 17, 2020 Public Order Under City of Los Angeles Emergency Authority re: Tolling HCIDLA Deadlines and Revising Expiration of Emergency Orders PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the AVENEL COOPERATIVE HOUSING PROJECT REQUEST: Declare the property an Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER/APPLICANT: Julia Meltzer, HOA Board President Avenel Condominium Association 2839 ½ North Avenel Street Los Angeles, CA 90039 PREPARER: Robert Chattel Chattel, Incorporated 13417 Ventura Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90423 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Take the property under consideration as an Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.10 because the application and accompanying photo documentation suggest the submittal warrants further investigation. 2. Adopt the report findings. VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP Director of PlanningN1907 CHC-2020-3767-HCM 2841-2849 North Avenel Street Page 2 of 5 [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Principal City Planner Shannon Ryan, Senior City Planner Office of Historic Resources Office of Historic Resources [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Lambert M.
    [Show full text]
  • New Web Feature Showcases Conservancy Conservation
    Volume 33 J u l a u g 2 0 1 1 Number 4 Local State Historic Parks on Closure List by Adrian Scott Fine On May 12, the Conservancy honored the Antelope Valley Indian Museum State Historic Park with a 2011 Preservation Award for its outstanding preservation and recent reopening. Imagine our surprise the very next day, when the museum appeared on California State Parks’ list of parks it plans to permanently close due to the state budget crisis. The list of seventy parks includes five in Los Angeles County (four of which are designated as historic) and forty percent of LEFT: The Conservancy obtained an easement in 1985 from developer Wayne Ratkovich for the 1931 Pellissier Building and Wiltern Theatre. Photo from L.A. Conservancy archives. RIGHT: The Conservancy also holds all state historic parks in California. an easement protecting the original exterior, interior, and landscape features of the Joseph Residence and Stabilizing and restoring the Antelope Apartments, built between 1946 and 1970. Photo by Dean Cheng. Valley Indian Museum building took nearly a decade of planning, two years of construction New Web Feature Showcases (including a temporary delay due to the loss of funding), and $1.4 million. In addition to the irony of the timing, closing the museum after Conservancy Conservation Easements investing so much time, effort, and money by Adrian Scott Fine would squander these resources as well as Saving historic places rarely takes a one-size-fits-all approach; the Conservancy most our heritage. often applies a different set of tools and strategies in each case.
    [Show full text]
  • How Historic Preservationists and Affordable Housing Advocates Can Work Together to Prevent the Demolition of Rent-Stabilized Housing in Los Angeles Emily Milder
    Historically Affordable: How Historic Preservationists and Affordable Housing Advocates Can Work Together to Prevent the Demolition of Rent-Stabilized Housing in Los Angeles Emily Milder I. Introduction ..............................................................................................104 II. Los Angeles’ Unaffordable Rental Market..........................................105 III. State Laws as Obstacles to Local Rent Control Efforts ....................106 A. LARSO and the Costa-Hawkins Act............................................. 106 B. Ellis Act .............................................................................................. 108 IV. Historic Preservation in Los Angeles ..................................................111 A. Recent Progress................................................................................. 111 B. Protections for HCMs and Their Potential for Use by Housing Activists ............................................................................. 115 C. Examples of Collaboration Between Housing Advocates and Historic Preservationists.................................................................. 117 1. Flores and Edinburgh .............................................................117 2. Lincoln Place ............................................................................120 3. Wyvernwood Garden Apartments.......................................123 V. Suggestions for Enhanced Collaboration ............................................125 A. Joint Advocacy for Systemic Reform
    [Show full text]
  • 9430 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD HABS No. CA-1298 (Commercial Building) Beverly Hills Los Angeles County California
    9430 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD HABS No. CA-1298 (Commercial Building) Beverly Hills Los Angeles County California WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA INDEX TO PHOTOGRAPHS PHOTOGRAPHS ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS Submitted to: Christy Avery HABS Historian National Park Service, Cultural Resources 909 1st Avenue, 5th Floor Seattle, WA 98104 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDING SURVEY 9430 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD (Commercial Building) HABS No. CA-1298 Location: 9430 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills, Los Angeles County, California. Present The present owner is Los Angeles County Metropolitan Owner/Occupant: Transportation Authority (Metro). Present occupant is the Ace Gallery Beverly Hills. Present Use: Art gallery Significance: The building located at 9430 Wilshire Blvd. was determined eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion C and the California Register of Historical Resources under Criterion 3 as a building that embodies the distinctive characteristics of the Brutalist architectural style. The building was originally designed in an Art Deco style in 1931. The primary façade, facing Wilshire Boulevard, was subsequently altered in 1948, 1956, and 1963. In 1963, architect Sidney Eisenshtat transformed the façade into the New Formalist style that exists in 2016. Historian(s): Allison M. Lyons Andrea Galvin GPA Consulting July 15, 2016 Project The building is proposed for demolition as part of the Westside Information: Subway Extension project and this documentation was prepared as a mitigation measure for the demolition. Measured drawings prepared by Robert Imboden and David Larson of Kelly Sutherlin McLeod Architecture, Inc. and Allen White of GBG, Inc. Photographs prepared by Steve Schafer from Schaf Studio. Historical report prepared by Allison M. Lyons and Andrea Galvin of GPA Consulting, Inc.
    [Show full text]