DOCSLIB.ORG

Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) on March 7, 2017 for a Historic Evaluation for the Scope of Work

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) on March 7, 2017 for a Historic Evaluation for the Scope of Work CITY OF VENTURA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE - Agenda Item: 2 Hearing Date: May 23, 2018 Project No: 11427 Case No: H RA-3-17-39567 ---~-----·-~-·-~- --- Applicant: Andrew Langroudi I Ventura Solar Properties LLC Planner: ~v Don Nielsen, Associate Planner, (805) 677-3959 ~ Dave Ward, AICP, Planning Manager Location: 250 South Mills Road (Attachment A) AP N: 079-0-1 01-300 Recommendation: 1. Discuss the property owner's intended use of the building and how to approach exterior and interior modifications to the building; and 2. Encourage the property owner to submit a local Historic Landmark Designation application and consider filing an application to list the building on the National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historic Places. Zoning: Limited Commercial (C-1) & Intermediate Commercial (C-1A) Land Use: Commerce Regulatory Review: SBMC Sec. 2.4.30.130 & 2R.450.220 Environmental Review: CEQA Guidelines Section 15306 - Information Collection PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a Historic Resources Assessment for the review of a Phase 1 Historical Resources Report for a 14, 112 square foot, two story office building and associated parking garage, built in 1965, on a 2.00 acre property located at 250 South Mills Road in the Limited Commercial (C-1) & Intermediate Commercial (C-1A) zone districts with a land use designation of Comme.rce. The project site is not located next to any recognized landmarks, or points of interests or within a historic district. PROJ-11427 HPC/05/23/18/DN Page 1 of 4 HPC - 1 BACKGROUND On March 3, 2017, the Planning Division was notified of construction activity at the subjectsite; no construction or demolition permits were issued. In accordance with the Policies and Procedures for Historic Resources Protection (PPHR), the proposed demolition requires historical assessment as the existing structure is over 40 years old. As the moject is over 40 years old, staff conducted a 5- day posting to the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) on March 7, 2017 for a historic evaluation for the scope of work. • March 7 through March 14, 2017 o Tenant improvement to lower/garage level of 2 story building. See elevations. Interior stair connecting upper/ ground floor level\ with lower level to be removed. Stair opening to be infilled. Upper and lower levels to be structurally reinforced. Future tenant improvement for upper level not included under this scope of work or permit. All exterior stairs are to remain. New exterior elevator to be provided. Lower level tenant improvement includes two existing suites within underground par. The 5-day posting was pulled, with two or more HPC members requesting for the project to be scheduled for their review. The applicant is therefore requesting a Historical Resource Assessment by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and has submitted the required Phase 1 Historical Resources Report. The property is not listed or identified in the 1983 Cultural Heritage Survey, the 2007 Historic Resources Survey Update, or the California State Historical Resources Inventory. On April 17, 2017, a site visit with the applicant, staff, and the contracted historic consultant (Historic Resources Group) was conducted. On May 9, 2017, a Building Permit was issued for a change of use from bank to medical offices on the first-floor (not visible from Mills Road due to the surrounding sunken garden with landscaped berm) of the existing building and included plumbing, electrical, and mechanical work with some exterior work. The existing interior stairs were to remain. On October 4, 2017 a "Stop Work" order was issued by the Building and Safety Department for work that went beyond the identified Scope of Work. • Cutting the concrete floor between 1st & 2nd floor for an elevator that is not on approved plans. PROJ-11427 HPC/05/23/18/DN Page 2 of 4 HPC - 2 On April 25, 2018 the HPC reviewed the Phase I Historic Resources Report and made the following motions: • Confirm by Minute Motion that the subject structure is historically significant on the National, State, and Local Levels based on the findings within the Phase I Historic Resources Report. • Motion to continue the item to a-date certain of May 23, 2018 for a site visit to 250 South Mills Road to inspect existing conditions and to disc;:uss with the property owner the intended use of the building and how to approach exterior and interior modifications to the building. Encourage the property owner to submit for landmark status on the National, State, and Local levels and a Mills Act. STAFF ANALYSIS Per the April 25, 2018 HPC Motion, staff, the applicant, the HPC, and any members of the public will meet at the project site, 250 South Mills Road, to inspect existing · conditions and to discuss with the property owner the intended use of the building and how to approach exterior and interior modifications to the building. No additional analysis is being provided beyond what had previously been provided within the staff report presented to the HPC on April 24, 2018 (Attachment A). PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS staff received public communication concerning the proposed project (Attachment B). CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Staff has determined the proposed project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15306 (Class 6, Information Collection) because the Preliminary Historical Assessment consists of information gathering purposes, or as part of a study leading to an action which a public agency has not yet approved, adopted, or funded. No exceptions apply to defeat the exemption. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends. that theHPC: . 1. Discuss the property owner's intended use of the building and how to approach exterior and interior modifications to the building; and 2. Encourage the property owner to submit a local Historic Landmark Designation application and consider filing an application to list the building on the National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historic Places. PROJ-11427 HPC/05/23/18/DN Page 3 of 4 HPC - 3 FUTURE ACTIONS • Planning application for local Historic Landmark Designation and Design Review Permit, and potentially a Mills Act Contract. ATTACHMENTS A. Historic Preservation Committee Staff Report dated April 25, 2018 (with L Attachments) B. Correspondence from Carol Cintron Received May 8, 2018 PROJ-11427 HPC/05/23/18/DN Page 4 of 4 HPC - 4 Attachment A Historic Preservation Committee Staff Report dated April 25, 2018 (with Attachments) HPC - 5 CITY OFVENTURA HISTORIC PRf.Sf.RVATION COMMITTf.f. - - Agenda Item: 2 Hearing Date: April 25, 2018 ,, Project No: 11427 Case No: H RA-3-17 -39567 - - Applicant: Andrew Langroudi I Ventura Solar Properties LLC Planner: Don Nielsen, Associate Planner, (805) 6TZ-_3959 Sc.:ttt~lw,;h-ArDave Ward, AICP, Planning Manager/7"'):; ,, Location: 250 South Mills Road (Attachment A) AP N: 079-0-101-300 Recommendation: 1. Confirm by minute motion that the subject structure is historically significant; 2. Encourage the property owner to submit a local Historic Landmark Designation application and consider filing an application to list the building on the National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historic Places; and 3. Discuss the property owner's intended use of the building and how to approach exterior and interior modifications to the building. Zoning: Limited Commercial (C-1) & Intermediate Commercial (C-1A) Land Use: Commerce Regulatory Review: SSMC Sec. 2.4.30.130 & 2R.450.220 .. Environmental Review: CEQA Guidelines Section 15306 - Information Collection PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a Historic Resources Assessment for the review of a Phase 1 Historical Resources Report for a 14, 112 square foot, two story office building and associated parking garage, built in 1965, on a 2.00 acre property located at 250 South Mills Road in the Limited Commercial (C-1) & Intermediate Commercial (C-1A) zone districts with a land use designation of Commerce. The project site is not located next to any recognized landmarks, or points of interests or within a historic district. The review of the Phase 1 Historical Resources Report that was prepared for the property is to determine the national, state and local historical significance of the subject PROJ-11427 HPC/04/25/18/DN Page 1 of 11 HPC - 6 building. If the project site is deemed to not be a historical resource, separate Planning and Building Permit applications would be submitted for exterior modifications. BACKGROUND On March 3, 2017, the Planning Division was notified of construction activity at the subject site; no construction or demolition permits were issued. In accordance with the Policies and Procedures for Historic Resources Protection (PPHR), the proposed demolition requires historical assessment as the existing structure is over 40 years old. As the project is over 40 years old, staff conducted a 5- day posting to the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) on March 7, 2017 for a historic evaluation for the scope of work (Attachment 8). • March 7 through March 14, 2017 o Tenant improvement to lower/garage level of 2 story building. See elevations. Interior stair connecting upper/ ground floor level with lower level to be removed. Stair opening to be infilled. Upper and lower levels to be structurally reinforced. Future tenant improvement for upper level not included under this scope of work or permit. All exterior stairs are to remain. New exterior elevator to be provided. Lower level tenant improvement includes two existing suites within underground par. The 5-day posting was pulled, with two or more HPC members requesting for the project to be scheduled for their review. The applicant is therefore requesting a Historical Resource Assessment by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and has submitted the required Phase 1 Historical Resources Report (Attachment C). The property is not listed or identified in the 1983 Cultural Heritage Survey, the 2007 Historic Resources Survey Update, or the California State Historical Resources Inventory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WILLIAM PEREIRA by Ray Watson
    1 WILLIAM PEREIRA By Ray Watson Nestled inland from the Pacific Ocean midway between Los Angeles and San Diego, the City of Irvine is internationally acclaimed as the most successful New Community developed in this century. Conceived in 1959 by William Pereira as a university community to accompany a new campus of the University of California, Irvine was born in 1965 and the campus and the city have grown up together as part of an historic alliance that continues to this day. The transformation of the Irvine Ranch from its agricultural heritage to one of this nation’s best known new urban communities is a tribute to the long term stewardship of the Irvine Company and William Pereira whose original vision set a course the company has faithfully followed for over forty years. While Pereira’s original charge was limited to 10,000 of the ranch’s 93,000 acres the principles he espoused for planning the new university town soon became the guiding urban goals for the entire ranch. Mixed use residential, business and commercial villages connected by regional roads, bikes trails and open space corridors. Portions of the ranch have become parts of neighboring cities such as Newport Beach, Costa Mesa, Laguna Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Orange. But in each case the same care and thought that he urged for the future University City was given to the parcels that were claimed by the municipalities that surrounded the ranch and would soon become neighbors of the new city. This is as much a story of the urbanization and interrelationship of a substantial piece of a metropolitan region as it is the development of one of its towns.
    [Show full text]
  • 32Nd Annual California Preservation Design Awards
    32ND ANNUAL CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION DESIGN AWARDS OCTOBER 2, 2015 JULIA MORGAN BALLROOM, MERCHANTS EXCHANGE BUILDING SAN FRANCISCO The Board of Trustees of the California Preservation Foundation welcomes you to the Preservation Design Awards Ceremony Friday, October 2, 2015 Julia Morgan Ballroom, Merchants Exchange Building, San Francisco 6:00 pm Cocktail Reception and Dinner 7:30 pm Welcome Kelly Sutherlin McLeod, FAIA President, Board of Trustees California Preservation Foundation Cindy L. Heitzman, Executive Director, California Preservation Foundation Awards Presentations Presentation of the President’s Award for Lifetime Acheivement John F. Merritt Presentation of the 32nd Annual Preservation Design Awards Kurt Schindler, FAIA, Jury Chair Amy Crain Jeff Greene Leo Marmol, FAIA Chuck Palley Jay Reiser, S.E. Annual Sponsors Cornerstone Spectra Company Cornice Architectural Resources Group IS Architecture Cody Anderson Wasney Architects, Inc. Kelly Sutherlin McLeod Architecture, Inc. EverGreene Architectural Arts Kitson Contracting, Inc. Garavaglia Architecture Page & Turnbull GPA Consulting Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, Inc. Historic Resources Group Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. Holmes Culley/Holmes Fire 2 Preservation Design Awards 2015 Preservation Design Awards Sponsors Pillar Kelly Sutherlin McLeod Architecture, Inc. Plant Construction Marmol Radziner Plath and Company, Inc. Supporting AC Martin MATT Construction Corporation Cody | Brock Commercial Builders Rinne & Peterson Structural Engineers Cody Anderson Wasney Architects, Inc. Vallier Design Associates Leddy Maytum Stacy Architects Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. Nonprofit Fort Mason Center 3 Preservation Design Awards 2015 2015 Awards Jury Kurt Schindler, FAIA, LEED AP Principal, ELS Architecture and Urban Design | Awards Chair and PDA Jury Chair Kurt Schindler is a principal at ELS and directs the firm’s historic and seismic renovation projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyvernwood Garden Apartments Has Fostered a Strong Sense of Community Among Its 6,000 Residents
    Volume 33 m a r a p r 2 0 1 1 Number 2 Last Remaining Seats Turns 25! Member ticket sales start March 30 Celebrate a quarter century of classic films and live entertainment in the historic theatres of Los Angeles! The 25th Annual Last Remaining Seats series takes place May 25 through June 29. You will receive a large postcard in the mail this year in lieu of a brochure; you can find all the details and order tickets starting March 30 at laconservancy.org. We were finalizing the schedule at press time; it should be online by the time you receive this newsletter. In addition to the six Wednesday evening screenings, this special season will include a bonus Fan Favorite film (Sunset Boulevard, Despite its vast size, Wyvernwood Garden Apartments has fostered a strong sense of community among its 6,000 residents. Clockwise from top left: Historic view of the complex (Security Pacific Collection/Los Angeles Public selected by you, our members!). It will screen Library); current residents (Jesus Hermosillo); a resident sends a message (Evangelina Garza); teenager Juan twice (matinee and evening shows) at the Pal- Bucio’s depiction of what Wyvernwood means to him; young residents (Molly Mills). ace Theatre on Sunday, June 26, a hundred years to the day after it opened! We’ll be at the Wyvernwood Garden Apartments: Palace as part of a broader celebration of the centennial of several theatres on Broadway. Remember to take part in our 2011 mem- Community by Design bership drive for your chance to win VIP by Cindy Olnick and Karina Muñiz tickets to a Last Remaining Seats screening.
    [Show full text]
  • Raise a Glass to History—Before It's Too Late
    NEWS Jan/Feb 2018 • Volume 40 Number 1 Celebrate 40 Years of Preservation Happy Anniversary! This year marks forty years since the Conservancy’s founding in 1978. The staff, volunteers, and members of the Conservancy have made a significant impact in preserving the historic places that make L.A. County unique. Thank you! Anniversaries are great times for reflec- tion, and we have much to celebrate. Yet this is also a time to redouble our efforts and renew our commitment. What will Los An- geles look like forty years from now? How will we make sure that future includes the best of our past? The Conservancy won a $150,000 grant to help rehabilitate the famed Formosa Café in West Hollywood. Legacy We’ll mark this milestone throughout bars and restaurants like the Formosa are exceedingly rare, threatened by development pressure, rising rents, the year in various ways, from special events changing demographics, and other factors. Photo by Douglas Hill, courtesy National Trust for Historic Preservation. and newsletter features to new initiatives. As always, for the latest news, join us on social Raise a Glass to History—Before It’s Too Late media and subscribe to our email newsletters. by Cindy Olnick This anniversary is as much yours as If you’re one of the many people who voted for the Formosa Café in last fall’s Partners anyone’s, since your membership makes this in Preservation campaign, thank you! Created by the National Trust for Historic Preserva- work possible. If you have a personal story tion and American Express, Partners in Preservation awards preservation funding to projects to share—about the Conservancy or historic across the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources November 2019 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTORS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Related Contexts and Evaluation Considerations 1 Other Sources for Military Historic Contexts 3 MILITARY INSTITUTIONS AND ACTIVITIES HISTORIC CONTEXT 3 Historical Overview 3 Los Angeles: Mexican Era Settlement to the Civil War 3 Los Angeles Harbor and Coastal Defense Fortifications 4 The Defense Industry in Los Angeles: From World War I to the Cold War 5 World War II and Japanese Forced Removal and Incarceration 8 Recruitment Stations and Military/Veterans Support Services 16 Hollywood: 1930s to the Cold War Era 18 ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS FOR AIR RAID SIRENS 20 ATTACHMENT A: FALLOUT SHELTER LOCATIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities PREFACE These “Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities” (Guidelines) were developed based on several factors. First, the majority of the themes and property types significant in military history in Los Angeles are covered under other contexts and themes of the citywide historic context statement as indicated in the “Introduction” below. Second, many of the city’s military resources are already designated City Historic-Cultural Monuments and/or are listed in the National Register.1 Finally, with the exception of air raid sirens, a small number of military-related resources were identified as part of SurveyLA and, as such, did not merit development of full narrative themes and eligibility standards.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.Edinburgh Bungalow Court Final.Pdf
    EDINBURGH BUNGALOW COURT 750 – 756 ½ N. Edinburgh CHC-2015-3386-HCM ENV-2015-3387-CE Agenda packet includes 1. Final Staff Recommendation Report 2. Categorical Exemption 3. Director's Initation of Nomination 4. Nomination 5. Information Submitted by Property Owner 6. Letters in Support of Designation Please click on each document to be directly taken to the corresponding page of the PDF. Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC-2015-3386-HCM ENV-2015-3387-CE HEARING DATE: November 19, 2015 Location: 750 – 756 ½ N. Edinburgh Avenue TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 5 PLACE: City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Hollywood 200 N. Spring Street Area Planning Commission: Central Los Angeles, CA Neighborhood Council: Mid City West 90012 Legal Description: TR 4891, Lot 101and 102 PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the EDINBURGH BUNGALOW COURT REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER(S): BLDG Edinburgh, LLC c/o Guy Penini 755 N. Laurel Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90046 APPLICANT: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning 200 N. Spring Street, Room 559 Los Angeles, CA 90012 PREPARER: Katie E. Horak and Jennifer Trotoux Architectural Resources Group, Inc. 8 Mills Place, #300 Pasadena, CA 91105 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Declare the subject property a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.7. 2. Adopt the staff report and findings. MICHAEL J. LOGRANDE Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Lambert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation. Updated July 2014. MLA 6Th Edition. Paul Revere Williams Project
    Historic Preservation. Updated July 2014. MLA 6th edition. Paul Revere Williams Project. Art Museum of the University of Memphis. "$1.1 Million Donated to Community Theater (Lear Theater)." Reno Gazette-Journal (1997): 1. "2004 Eleven most endangered (La Concha." Preserve Nevada. 2008. 5/6/2008 <http://preservenevada.unlv.edu>. Abercrombie, Brooke, and Irmina Kobylko. "Where Williams Walked: Pasadena Architect James V. Coane Leaves an Invisible Footprint on His Renovation of a 1928 Spanish Colonial Estate Designed by Los Angeles' Renowned Architect to the Stars." Pasadena Weekly April 1 2009: 5. 4/28/09 <http://pasadenaweekly.com/cms/story/detail/wh...>. "African-American Historical Site may Face the Wrecking Ball." The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education.46 (2004/2005): 52. "Ambassador Hotel Saga Ends: LA Conservancy Moves on." Forum News: National Trust for Historic Preservation XIV.5 (2008): 8. "Ambassador Hotel Updates." Los Angeles Conservancy: Preservation Issues.February (2004): 1/30/2008. google. 1/30/2008 <http://www.laconservancy.org/issues/ambassador-dec.php4>. Anderson, Lisa. "Historic Preservation--Las Vegas Style: A Masterpiece of Motel Architecture from the Era of the Rat Pack is being Preserved (La Concha)." Chicago Tribune December 21 2006. Gale: General OneFile Print. 4/24/2009 <http://find.galegroup.com>. "Los Angeles Airport Theme Building is Designated Landmark." Historic Preservation News 33.3 (1993): 4. "Los Angeles' Newest Historic-Cultural Monuments (Castera 2007)." City of Los Angles, Department of City Planning. Office of Historic Resources 2.1 (2008): 5-6. "Los Angeles' Newest Historic-Cultural Monuments (St. Philip HCM 988)." City of Los Angeles, Department of City Planning: Office of Historic Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL NEWS| Winter 2008
    Changes to Halprin’s Landmark Freeway Park in Seattle Originally designed by Lawrence Halprin and Associates, the plantings at Seattle’s Freeway Park are currently being updated by Seattle landscape architect and University of Washington professor Iain Robertson, who aims to “not change the character of the park, but to recharge the design." Executed by Mr. Halprin’s office under the design direction of Angela Danadjieva, Freeway Park is one of the best preserved masterworks of post-war landscape architecture, yet the horticultural requirements of the plants necessitate renewed attention to the origi- nal design intent. However, its fate may also be a bellweather for the future of modernist architecture, landscapes and engineering feats associated with the interstate highway system across the country. After the publication of Halprin’s book Freeways in Aerial view of the park over Interstate 5 in downtown Seattle circa 1999. 1966 and his work with the Freeway Park, Seattle, WA (Photo courtesy of the City of Seattle) Federal Highway Administration’s Urban Advisors group, the Seattle Parks Commission sought his assistance in designing a park along the edge of the new interstate gorge. Rather than confining himself to the proposed plot of land, Halprin pushed the ideas in his book into the cityscape by proposing an extensive landscape that scaled down the impact of the freeway for both driver and pedestrian by building right over it. Rather than balking at this audacious plan, the city bun- dled the proposal into the county-wide open space
    [Show full text]
  • OCT28 2013 Date
    DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING EXECUTIVE OFFICES OFFICE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES 200 N. SPRING STREET, ROOM 620 CITY OF Los ANGELES MICHAEL LOGRANDE Los ANGELES,CA 90012-4801 DIRECTOR' (213) 978-1200 CALIFORNIA (213) 978-1271 AlAN BELl, AlCP CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION DEPUTY DIRECTOR (213) 978-1272 RICHARD BARRON PRESIDENT USA WEBBER, AICP ROELLA H. LOUIE DEPUTY DIRECTOR VICE-PRESIDENT (213) 978-1274 TARA). HAMACHER GAlL KENNARD EVA YUAN-MCDANIEL oz scorr DEPUTY DIRECTOR ERIC GARCETTI (213) 978-1273 FELY C. PINGOL MAYOR FAX: (213) 978-1275 COMMISSION EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT (213) 978-1294 INFORMATION (213) 978-1270 OCT28 2013 www.p!anning.lacity.o.rg Date: Los Angeles City Council Room 395, City Hall 200 North Spring Street, Room 410 Los Angeles, California 90012 Attention: Sharon Gin, Legislative Assistant Planning and Land Use Management Committee .. "". '~ 'f;-;-" . SUBJECT: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (USC) FACILITIES VARIOUS LOCATIONS . At the Cultural Heritage Commission meeting of October 17, 2013, the Commission moved to include the above properties in the list of Historic-Cultural Monument, subject to adoption by the City Council. As required under the provisions of Section 22.171.10 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code, the Commission has solicited opinions and information from the office of the Council District in which the site is located and from any Department or Bureau of the city whose operations may be affected by the designation of such site as a Historic-Cultural Monument. Such designation in and of itself has no fiscal impact. Future applications for permits may cause minimal administrative costs. The City Council, according to the guidelines set forth in Section 22.171 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code, shall act on the proposed inclusion to the list within 90 days of the Council or Commission action, whichever first occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER 1996 Preservation
    VOLUME 21, No.3 CALIFORNIA SUMMER 1996 Preservation A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION FOUNDATION L.A.C. scores wins in St. Vibiana 's fight The Los Angeles Conservancy has run worked for more than a year to convince up a string of legal victories in its battle him to save the 1876 church by having it to save St. Vibiana's Cathedral. The serve another purpose within the proposed Catholic Archdiocese and the City of cathedral complex. The Archdiocese, This issue: Los Angeles, however, seem intent on however, has pledges of $45 million demolishing the 120 year-old city (continued on page 8) 2 Cal. Register monument, even though Cardinal Roger update ·· Mahony has announced he will not San Jose conference build his $45 million replacement 4 draws 400; Bill Delvac Preservationist cathedral on the site of the current of the Year P.O.Y. church. It is a fight that has split the honored as community and set a dangerous 10 Legislative An afternoon surfing the Internet, a sold-out precedent for bypassing local ·. upaates Public Art Controversy tour, a participative preservation ordinances and state economic development charrette, and tracks environmental laws. 12 Annual on Preservation Planning and Strategies for St. Vibiana's was built in 1876 as an conference Success were just some of the highlights of supporters expression of faith in the city's future CPF's 21st Annual Preservation Conference and its growth from pueblo to held May 30-June 2 in San Jose. More than metropolis, says L.A. Conservancy 400 preservationists attended the conference Executive Director Linda and were on hand to honor six President's Dishman.
    [Show full text]
  • Chc-2020-3767-Hcm Env-2020-3768-Ce
    Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC-2020-3767-HCM ENV-2020-3768-CE HE ARING DATE: July 16, 2020 Location: 2841-2849 North Avenel Street TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 4 – Ryu PLACE : Teleconference (see Community Plan Area: Hollywood agenda for login Area Planning Commission: Central information) Neighborhood Council: Silver Lake Legal Description: Ivanhoe Tract, Block 10, Lots 32-34 EXPIRATION DATE: The original 30-day expiration date of July 19, 2020 per Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 22.171.10(e)1 is tolled, and a revised date will be determined pursuant to the Mayor’s March 21, 2020 Public Order Under City of Los Angeles Emergency Authority re: Tolling of Deadlines Prescribed in the Municipal Code and April 17, 2020 Public Order Under City of Los Angeles Emergency Authority re: Tolling HCIDLA Deadlines and Revising Expiration of Emergency Orders PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the AVENEL COOPERATIVE HOUSING PROJECT REQUEST: Declare the property an Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER/APPLICANT: Julia Meltzer, HOA Board President Avenel Condominium Association 2839 ½ North Avenel Street Los Angeles, CA 90039 PREPARER: Robert Chattel Chattel, Incorporated 13417 Ventura Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90423 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Take the property under consideration as an Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.10 because the application and accompanying photo documentation suggest the submittal warrants further investigation. 2. Adopt the report findings. VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP Director of PlanningN1907 CHC-2020-3767-HCM 2841-2849 North Avenel Street Page 2 of 5 [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Principal City Planner Shannon Ryan, Senior City Planner Office of Historic Resources Office of Historic Resources [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Lambert M.
    [Show full text]
  • New Web Feature Showcases Conservancy Conservation
    Volume 33 J u l a u g 2 0 1 1 Number 4 Local State Historic Parks on Closure List by Adrian Scott Fine On May 12, the Conservancy honored the Antelope Valley Indian Museum State Historic Park with a 2011 Preservation Award for its outstanding preservation and recent reopening. Imagine our surprise the very next day, when the museum appeared on California State Parks’ list of parks it plans to permanently close due to the state budget crisis. The list of seventy parks includes five in Los Angeles County (four of which are designated as historic) and forty percent of LEFT: The Conservancy obtained an easement in 1985 from developer Wayne Ratkovich for the 1931 Pellissier Building and Wiltern Theatre. Photo from L.A. Conservancy archives. RIGHT: The Conservancy also holds all state historic parks in California. an easement protecting the original exterior, interior, and landscape features of the Joseph Residence and Stabilizing and restoring the Antelope Apartments, built between 1946 and 1970. Photo by Dean Cheng. Valley Indian Museum building took nearly a decade of planning, two years of construction New Web Feature Showcases (including a temporary delay due to the loss of funding), and $1.4 million. In addition to the irony of the timing, closing the museum after Conservancy Conservation Easements investing so much time, effort, and money by Adrian Scott Fine would squander these resources as well as Saving historic places rarely takes a one-size-fits-all approach; the Conservancy most our heritage. often applies a different set of tools and strategies in each case.
    [Show full text]