Establishment of a Gnotobiotic Mouse Model to Investigate the Mechanisms of Colonization Resistance Against Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium (S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Establishment of a Gnotobiotic Mouse Model to Investigate the Mechanisms of Colonization Resistance Against Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium (S Aus dem Max von Pettenkofer-Institut für Hygiene und Medizinische Mikrobiologie Lehrstuhl: Bakteriologie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Vormaliger Direktor: Prof. Dr. Dr. Jürgen Heesemann Kommissarischer Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Rainer Haas Thema der Dissertation: Establishment of a gnotobiotic mouse model to investigate the mechanisms of colonization resistance against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Tm) and study of the protective role of the intestinal mucus layer during S. Tm infection Dissertation zum Erwerb des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München vorgelegt von Sandrine Brugiroux aus Firminy, Frankreich 2016 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Medizinischen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Bärbel Stecher Mitberichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Heinrich Jung Mitbetreuung durch den promovierten Mitarbeiter: …………………………………………………… Dekan: Prof. Dr. med. dent. Reinhard Hickel Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 10.10.2016 Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich, Sandrine Brugiroux, erkläre hiermit an Eides statt, dass ich die vorliegende Dissertation mit dem Thema: “Establishment of a gnotobiotic mouse model to investigate the mechanisms of colonization resistance against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Tm) and study of the protective role of the intestinal mucus layer during S. Tm infection” selbständig verfasst, mich außer der angegebenen keiner weiteren Hilfsmittel bedient und alle Erkenntnisse, die aus dem Schrifttum ganz oder annähernd übernommen sind, als solche kenntlich gemacht und nach ihrer Herkunft unter Bezeichnung der Fundstelle einzeln nachgewiesen habe. Ich erkläre des Weiteren, dass die hier vorgelegte Dissertation nicht in gleicher oder in ähnlicher Form bei einer anderen Stelle zur Erlangung eines akademischen Grades eingereicht wurde. Nîmes, 20.10.2016 Sandrine Brugiroux Ort, Datum Unterschrift To all the mice sacrificed for science. Table of contents List of figures ..............................................................................................................................................xi List of tables .............................................................................................................................................. xiv List of abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ xvii List of publications ..................................................................................................................................... xx Summary ................................................................................................................................................... xxi Zusammenfassung .................................................................................................................................. xxiii 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. The mammalian gut microbiota .................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1. Composition of the microbiota in humans and mice ........................................................... 1 1.1.2. The effects of the microbiota on its host ............................................................................. 2 1.1.2.1. Education of the immune system.................................................................................... 2 1.1.2.2. Influence of the gut microbiota on gut morphology and nutrition .................................. 3 1.1.3. Environmental and host factors influencing the intestinal microbiota composition ............ 4 1.1.3.1. Diet ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1.3.2. Antibiotic treatment........................................................................................................ 5 1.1.3.3. Inflammation and infection ............................................................................................ 5 1.1.3.4. Host genotype ................................................................................................................ 6 1.2. Analytical tools to study the gut microbiota composition and function ....................................... 6 1.2.1. High-throughput amplicon sequencing and quantitative PCR of bacterial 16S rRNA genes ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2.2. Meta-omics analyses .......................................................................................................... 7 1.2.3. Fluorescence in situ hybridization ...................................................................................... 8 1.2.4. Bacterial isolation and culture ............................................................................................ 8 Table of contents 1.3. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium - a model human pathogen to study microbiota- pathogen interaction in the gut .................................................................................................... 9 1.3.1. Mechanisms of Salmonella Typhimurium pathogenesis ..................................................... 9 1.3.2. Salmonella Typhimurium outcompetes the gut microbiota and benefits from the gut inflammation .................................................................................................................... 12 1.4. Colonization resistance ............................................................................................................. 13 1.4.1. Direct effects of the gut microbiota on the enteric pathogens ........................................... 14 1.4.2. Indirect effects on pathogen colonization ......................................................................... 15 1.4.3. Mouse models developed to study the colonization resistance and the underlined mechanisms ...................................................................................................................... 15 1.5. The intestinal mucus layer......................................................................................................... 16 1.5.1. Composition of the mucus layer ....................................................................................... 16 1.5.2. Interactions of the mucus layer with the gut microbiota and the enteropathogens ............ 17 1.5.3. Mouse models developed to study the role of the mucus layer ......................................... 18 1.5.4. The protein disulfide isomerase AGR2 and its functions .................................................. 19 2. Objectives .......................................................................................................................................... 21 3. Materials and Methods ...................................................................................................................... 22 3.1. Materials ................................................................................................................................... 22 3.1.1. Chemicals, Consumables and Instruments ........................................................................ 22 3.1.2. Oligonucleotides, probes and antibodies .......................................................................... 26 3.1.3. Plasmids and strains ......................................................................................................... 32 3.1.4. Media and buffers ............................................................................................................. 34 3.2. Methods .................................................................................................................................... 41 3.2.1. Bacterial culture methods ................................................................................................. 41 3.2.1.1. Cryoconservation of bacteria ........................................................................................ 41 3.2.1.2. Bacterial culture conditions .......................................................................................... 43 Table of contents 3.2.1.3. Streptomycin halo assay ............................................................................................... 43 3.2.2. Bacterial strains ................................................................................................................ 44 3.2.2.1. Salmonella strains ........................................................................................................ 44 3.2.2.2. The Altered Schaedler Flora strains ............................................................................. 44 3.2.2.3. Isolation of the Oligo-MM strains ................................................................................ 44 3.2.2.4. Preparation of bacterial inocula as frozen stocks .......................................................... 46 3.2.3. Molecular biology methods .............................................................................................. 46 3.2.3.1. Genomic DNA extraction ............................................................................................. 46 3.2.3.2. RNA extraction and microarray analysis .....................................................................
Recommended publications
  • WO 2018/064165 A2 (.Pdf)
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2018/064165 A2 05 April 2018 (05.04.2018) W !P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: Published: A61K 35/74 (20 15.0 1) C12N 1/21 (2006 .01) — without international search report and to be republished (21) International Application Number: upon receipt of that report (Rule 48.2(g)) PCT/US2017/053717 — with sequence listing part of description (Rule 5.2(a)) (22) International Filing Date: 27 September 2017 (27.09.2017) (25) Filing Language: English (26) Publication Langi English (30) Priority Data: 62/400,372 27 September 2016 (27.09.2016) US 62/508,885 19 May 2017 (19.05.2017) US 62/557,566 12 September 2017 (12.09.2017) US (71) Applicant: BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSI¬ TY OF TEXAS SYSTEM [US/US]; 210 West 7th St., Austin, TX 78701 (US). (72) Inventors: WARGO, Jennifer; 1814 Bissonnet St., Hous ton, TX 77005 (US). GOPALAKRISHNAN, Vanch- eswaran; 7900 Cambridge, Apt. 10-lb, Houston, TX 77054 (US). (74) Agent: BYRD, Marshall, P.; Parker Highlander PLLC, 1120 S. Capital Of Texas Highway, Bldg. One, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78746 (US). (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Composition of the Skin, Blood and Gut Microbiome in Rosacea—A Systematic Review of the Literature
    microorganisms Review Diversity and Composition of the Skin, Blood and Gut Microbiome in Rosacea—A Systematic Review of the Literature Klaudia Tutka, Magdalena Zychowska˙ and Adam Reich * Department of Dermatology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, 35-055 Rzeszow, Poland; [email protected] (K.T.); [email protected] (M.Z.)˙ * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-605076722 Received: 30 August 2020; Accepted: 6 November 2020; Published: 8 November 2020 Abstract: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder of a not fully understood pathophysiology. Microbial factors, although not precisely characterized, are speculated to contribute to the development of the condition. The aim of the current review was to summarize the rosacea-associated alterations in the skin, blood, and gut microbiome, investigated using culture-independent, metagenomic techniques. A systematic review of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was performed, according to PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses) guidelines. Nine out of 185 papers were eligible for analysis. Skin microbiome was investigated in six studies, and in a total number of 115 rosacea patients. Blood microbiome was the subject of one piece of research, conducted in 10 patients with rosacea, and gut microbiome was studied in two papers, and in a total of 23 rosacea subjects. Although all of the studies showed significant alterations in the composition of the skin, blood, or gut microbiome in rosacea, the results were highly inconsistent, or even, in some cases, contradictory. Major limitations included the low number of participants, and different study populations (mainly Asians). Further studies are needed in order to reliably analyze the composition of microbiota in rosacea, and the potential application of microbiome modifications for the treatment of this dermatosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Interaction Network of a Synthetic Gut Bacterial Community
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.25.432904; this version posted February 25, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Exploring the interaction network of a synthetic gut bacterial 2 community 3 4 Anna S. Weiss 1, Anna G. Burrichter 1*, Abilash Chakravarthy Durai Raj 1*, Alexandra von 5 Strempel 1, Chen Meng 2, Karin Kleigrewe 2, Philipp C. Münch 1,3, Luis Rössler 4, Claudia 6 Huber 4, Wolfgang Eisenreich 4, Lara M. Jochum 5, Stephanie Göing 6, Kirsten Jung 6, Alvaro 7 Sanchez 7,8, Bärbel Stecher 1,9 8 9 * These authors contributed equally to this work. 10 11 1 Max von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, 12 LMU Munich, Germany 13 2 Bavarian Center for Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, TU Munich, Freising, Germany 14 3 Department for Computational Biology of Infection Research, Helmholtz Center for 15 Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany 16 4 Department of Chemistry, Bavarian NMR Center – Structural Membrane Biochemistry, TU 17 Munich, Garching, Germany 18 5 Ramboll Deutschland GmbH, Munich, Germany 19 6 Department of Microbiology, LMU, Martinsried, Germany 20 7 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA 21 8 Microbial Sciences Institute, Yale University, West Haven, CT, USA 22 9 German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site LMU Munich, Germany 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.25.432904; this version posted February 25, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Binding Profile and Specificity of Monoclonal Iga to Microbiota Communities Under Steady State and Inflammatory Conditions
    Investigation of the binding profile and specificity of monoclonal IgA to microbiota communities under steady state and inflammatory conditions Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der RWTH Aachen University zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades einer Doktorin der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Johanna Kabbert, M.Sc. aus Berlin, Deutschland Berichter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Oliver Pabst Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Lars Blank Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 01.06.2021 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Universitätsbibliothek verfügbar. 0 Kabbert J, Benckert J, Rollenske T, Hitch C.A, Clavel T, Cerovic V, Wardemann H and Pabst O, High microbiota reactivity of adult human intestinal IgA requires somatic mutations. J Exp Med (2020) 217 (11): e20200275. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20200275 D 82 (Diss. RWTH Aachen University, 2021) 1 Table of Contents Abstract................................................................................................................................ 1 Zusammenfassung .............................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 “Guests” in the gut ................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Mucosal surfaces ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolome and Microbiota Analysis Reveals the Conducive Effect of Pediococcus Acidilactici BCC-1 and Xylan Oligosaccharides on Broiler Chickens
    fmicb-12-683905 May 23, 2021 Time: 14:38 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 28 May 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.683905 Metabolome and Microbiota Analysis Reveals the Conducive Effect of Pediococcus acidilactici BCC-1 and Xylan Oligosaccharides on Broiler Chickens Yuqin Wu1, Zhao Lei1, Youli Wang1, Dafei Yin1, Samuel E. Aggrey2, Yuming Guo1 and Jianmin Yuan1* 1 State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 2 NutriGenomics Laboratory, Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States Xylan oligosaccharides (XOS) can promote proliferation of Pediococcus acidilactic BCC-1, which benefits gut health and growth performance of broilers. The study aimed to investigate the effect of Pediococcus acidilactic BCC-1 (referred to BBC) and XOS on the gut metabolome and microbiota of broilers. The feed conversion ratio of BBC group, XOS group and combined XOS and BBC groups was lower Edited by: than the control group (P < 0.05). Combined XOS and BBC supplementation (MIX Michael Gänzle, group) elevated butyrate content of the cecum (P 0.05) and improved ileum University of Alberta, Canada < morphology by enhancing the ratio of the villus to crypt depth (P 0.05). The 16S Reviewed by: < Richard Ducatelle, rDNA results indicated that both XOS and BBC induced high abundance of butyric Ghent University, Belgium acid bacteria. XOS treatment elevated Clostridium XIVa and the BBC group enriched Shiyu Tao, Huazhong Agricultural University, Anaerotruncus and Faecalibacterium. In contrast, MIX group induced higher relative China abundance of Clostridiaceae XIVa, Clostridiaceae XIVb and Lachnospiraceae. Besides, *Correspondence: MIX group showed lower abundance of pathogenic bacteria such as Campylobacter.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Genome Sequence of Sutterella Sp. KGMB03119 Isolated from Healthy Korean Feces
    Korean Journal of Microbiology (2020) Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 65-68 pISSN 0440-2413 DOI https://doi.org/10.7845/kjm.2020.9143 eISSN 2383-9902 Copyright ⓒ 2020, The Microbiological Society of Korea Complete genome sequence of Sutterella sp. KGMB03119 isolated from healthy Korean feces 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Seoung Woo Ryu , Byeong Seob Oh , Seung Yeob Yu , Seung-Hwan Park , Se Won Kang , Ji-Sun Kim , Kook-Il Han , 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Keun Chul Lee , Mi Kyung Eom , Jam-Eon Park , Seung-Hyeon Choi , Min Kuk Suh , Han Sol Kim , Dong Ho Lee , 2 3 3 1,4 1 Hyuk Yoon , Byung-Yong Kim , Je Hee Lee , Jung-Sook Lee , and Ju Huck Lee * 1Korean Collection for Type Cultures, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Jeongeup 56212, Republic of Korea 2Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Republic of Korea 3ChunLab, Inc., Seoul 06725, Republic of Korea 4University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea 건강한 한국인 분변으로부터 분리된 Sutterella sp. KGMB03119 균주의 유전체 염기서열 유승우1 ・ 오병섭1 ・ 유승엽1 ・ 박승환1 ・ 강세원1 ・ 김지선1 ・ 한국일1 ・ 이근철1 ・ 엄미경1 ・ 박잠언1 ・ 최승현1 ・ 서민국1 ・ 김한솔1 ・ 이동호2 ・ 윤혁2 ・ 김병용3 ・ 이제희3 ・ 이정숙1,4 ・ 이주혁1* 1한국생명공학연구원 생물자원센터, 2분당서울대학교병원, 3천랩, 4과학기술연합대학원대학교 (Received November 19, 2019; Revised December 16, 2019; Accepted December 17, 2019) The genus of Sutterella was isolated from human and dog feces, Gut microbiota affect human fitness in a variety of ways; one except Sutterella wadsworthensis was isolated from human way is that the production of metabolites by microbes contri- appendiceal and peritoneal fluid. Sutterella sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasutterella, in Association with Irritable Bowel Syndrome And
    Parasutterella, in associated with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and intestinal chronic inflammation Running head: Parasutterella may be related with IBS Authors: Yan-Jie Chen1, Hao Wu1, Sheng-Di Wu1, Nan Lu, Yi-Ting Wang, Hai-Ning Liu, Ling Dong, Tao-Tao Liu, Xi-Zhong Shen* Author address: Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institute of Liver Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China *Correspondences: Xi-Zhong Shen, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd., Shanghai 200032, China, Tel: +86-21-64041990-2070; Fax: +86-21-64038038. E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] 1These authors contributed equally to this work. Acknowledgments The authors would like to express gratitude to the staff of Prof. Xi- Zhong Shen's laboratory for their critical discussion and reading of the manuscript. This study was supported by Youth Foundation of Zhongshan Hospital (No. 2015ZSQN08), Shanghai Sailing Program (No. 16YF1401500), Foundation of Shanghai Institute of Liver Diseases, and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81101540; No. 81101637; No. 81172273; No. 81272388). Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/jgh.14281 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Abstract Background and Aim: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly prevalent chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Toxicological Sciences (J
    The Journal of Toxicological Sciences (J. Toxicol. Sci.) 717 Vol.43, No.12, 717-725, 2018 Original Article Monomethylmercury degradation by the human gut microbiota is stimulated by protein amendments Galen Guo, Emmanuel Yumvihoze, Alexandre J. Poulain and Hing Man Chan Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada K1N 9B4 [Recommended by Akira Naganuma] (Received September 8, 2018; Accepted September 10, 2018) ABSTRACT — Monomethylmercury (MMHg) is a potent neurotoxicant that can be bioaccumulated and biomagnified through trophic levels. Human populations whose diets contain MMHg are at risk of MMHg toxicity. The gut microbiota was identified as a potential factor causing variation in MMHg absorption and body burden. However, little is known about the role of gut microbiota on Hg transformations. We conducted a series of in vitro experiments to study the effects of dietary nutrient change on Hg metab- olism and the human gut microbiota using anoxic fecal slurry incubations. We used stable Hg isotope tracers to track MMHg production and degradation and characterized the microbiota using high through- put sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. We show that the magnitude of MMHg degradation is individu- al dependent and rapidly responds to changes in nutrient amendments, leading to complete degradation of the MMHg present. Although the mechanism involved remains unknown, it does not appear to involve the well-known mer operon. Our data are the first to show a nutrient dependency on the ability of the sim- ulated human gut microbiota to demethylate MMHg. This work provides much-needed insights into indi- vidual variations in Hg absorption and potential toxicity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mouse Intestinal Bacterial Collection (Mibc) Provides Host-Specific Insight Into Cultured Diversity and Functional Potential of the Gut Microbiota
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 02, 2021 The Mouse Intestinal Bacterial Collection (miBC) provides host-specific insight into cultured diversity and functional potential of the gut microbiota Lagkouvardos, Ilias; Pukall, Rüdiger; Abt, Birte; Foesel, Bärbel U.; Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P.; Kumar, Neeraj; Bresciani, Anne Gøther; Martínez, Inés; Just, Sarah; Ziegler, Caroline Total number of authors: 28 Published in: Nature Microbiology Link to article, DOI: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.131 Publication date: 2016 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Lagkouvardos, I., Pukall, R., Abt, B., Foesel, B. U., Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Kumar, N., Bresciani, A. G., Martínez, I., Just, S., Ziegler, C., Brugiroux, S., Garzetti, D., Wenning, M., Bui, T. P. N., Wang, J., Hugenholtz, F., Plugge, C. M., Peterson, D. A., Hornef, M. W., ... Clavel, T. (2016). The Mouse Intestinal Bacterial Collection (miBC) provides host-specific insight into cultured diversity and functional potential of the gut microbiota. Nature Microbiology, 1(10), [16131]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.131 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Breadth and Depth of Diversity Within the Canine Gut Microbiome
    EXPLORING THE BREADTH AND DEPTH OF DIVERSITY WITHIN THE CANINE GUT MICROBIOME by DANIEL HAND A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Biosciences The University of Birmingham September 2010 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The mammalian gut microbiota is an essential factor in intestinal function and thus overall health. In the post genomic era, culture independent studies into the gut microbiota, particularly that of humans have allowed great leaps forward in knowledge of this ecosystem. Furthermore, recent advances in sequencing technologies have allowed acceleration and broadening of work in this research field. Despite this, the canine gut microbiome has remained relatively uncharacterised. This work investigates the faecal microbiota of a diverse multi-breed and multi-location group of 79 dogs, by amplifying and sequencing the 16S rRNA gene from these dogs using both Sanger sequencing of clone libraries and high throughput pyrosequencing. A robust census of the canine faecal microbiota was undertaken. The most abundant genera were the Bacteroides, Prevotella, Cetobacterium, Fusobacterium, Sutterella and Megamonas.
    [Show full text]
  • Candice Marie Colbey Bhsc (Honsclass1)
    Transcriptional and translational networks linking the immune system to health and disease Author Colbey, Candice M Published 2019-12-16 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School School of Medical Science DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/1384 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/390022 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Transcriptional and translational networks linking the immune system to health and disease Title Page Candice Marie Colbey BHSc (HonsClass1) School of Medical Science Griffith Health Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2019 Synopsis The contents of this thesis are organised into seven chapters and one appendix • Chapter 1 includes two literature reviews that discuss important factors associated with the development of upper respiratory symptoms (URS) in elite athletes. The first review discusses URS, its incidence and prevalence in elite athletes as well as the effects that exercise has on the immune system at the level of immune gene expression, immune cell phenotype and immunometabolism. The second review was published in Sports Medicine and is presented here in its published form. This review discusses the relationship between exercise, the gut microbiota, the common mucosal immune system and the risk, prevalence and incidence of URS. • Chapter 2 reports the incidence of URS in a cross-sectional study of elite Australian athletes, during a 30-day period, three months prior to a summer Olympic Games. Based on epidemiological data, the cohort was split into the two groups that are studied throughout this thesis; a group that did not present with URS (asymptomatic group) and a group that reported URS for a minimum of two days in the previous month (URS group).
    [Show full text]
  • Burkholderiales
    Genomic Evidence Reveals the Extreme Diversity and Wide Distribution of the Arsenic-Related Genes in Burkholderiales Xiangyang Li, Linshuang Zhang, Gejiao Wang* State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Life Sciences and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China Abstract So far, numerous genes have been found to associate with various strategies to resist and transform the toxic metalloid arsenic (here, we denote these genes as ‘‘arsenic-related genes’’). However, our knowledge of the distribution, redundancies and organization of these genes in bacteria is still limited. In this study, we analyzed the 188 Burkholderiales genomes and found that 95% genomes harbored arsenic-related genes, with an average of 6.6 genes per genome. The results indicated: a) compared to a low frequency of distribution for aio (arsenite oxidase) (12 strains), arr (arsenate respiratory reductase) (1 strain) and arsM (arsenite methytransferase)-like genes (4 strains), the ars (arsenic resistance system)-like genes were identified in 174 strains including 1,051 genes; b) 2/3 ars-like genes were clustered as ars operon and displayed a high diversity of gene organizations (68 forms) which may suggest the rapid movement and evolution for ars-like genes in bacterial genomes; c) the arsenite efflux system was dominant with ACR3 form rather than ArsB in Burkholderiales; d) only a few numbers of arsM and arrAB are found indicating neither As III biomethylation nor AsV respiration is the primary mechanism in Burkholderiales members; (e) the aio-like gene is mostly flanked with ars-like genes and phosphate transport system, implying the close functional relatedness between arsenic and phosphorus metabolisms.
    [Show full text]