DOCSLIB.ORG

Ouranopithecus Macedoniensis (Mammalia, Primates, Hominoidea): Virtual Reconstruction and 3D Analysis of a Juvenile Mandibular Dentition (Rpl-82 and Rpl-83)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ouranopithecus Macedoniensis (Mammalia, Primates, Hominoidea): Virtual Reconstruction and 3D Analysis of a Juvenile Mandibular Dentition (Rpl-82 and Rpl-83) Ouranopithecus macedoniensis (Mammalia, Primates, Hominoidea): virtual reconstruction and 3D analysis of a juvenile mandibular dentition (RPl-82 and RPl-83) Roberto MACCHIARELLI Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Département de Préhistoire, UMR 7194 CNRS, 1 rue René Panhard, F-75013 Paris (France), and Université de Poitiers, Département Géosciences, 40 av. du Recteur Pineau, F-86000 Poitiers (France) [email protected] Arnaud MAZURIER Société Études Recherches Matériaux, CRI-BIOPOLE, 4 rue C. Heitz, F-86000 Poitiers (France) [email protected] Bernhard ILLERHAUS Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Richard-Willstäatter-Str. 11, G-12478 Berlin (Germany) [email protected] Clément ZANOLLI Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Département de Préhistoire, UMR 7194 CNRS, 1 rue René Panhard, F-75013 Paris (France) [email protected] Macchiarelli R., Mazurier A., Illerhaus B. & Zanolli C. 2009 — Ouranopithecus macedonien- sis (Mammalia, Primates, Hominoidea): virtual reconstruction and 3D analysis of a juvenile mandibular dentition (RPl-82 and RPl-83). Geodiversitas 31 (4) : 851-863. ABSTRACT Dental enamel thickness is commonly listed among the diagnostic features for taxonomic assessment and phylogenetic reconstruction in the study of fossil homi nids, and is widely used as an indicator of dietary habits and palaeoen- KEY WORDS vironmental conditions. However, little quantitative information is currently Mammalia, Primates, available on its topographic variation in deciduous crowns of fossil primates. By Ouranopithecus, means of high-resolution microtomography, we investigated the inner structural hominid, Miocene ape, morphology of the mixed lower dentition of Ouranopithecus macedoniensis, a mixed dentition, late Miocene large-bodied ape from Macedonia, Greece. With respect to the microtomography, extant African apes and Homo, O. macedoniensis shows a signifi cant diff erence tooth inner structure, 3D reconstruction, in occlusal enamel thickness between the relatively thin deciduous second molar enamel thickness. and the absolutely thick-enamelled permanent fi rst molar. GEODIVERSITAS • 2009 • 31 (4) © Publications Scientifi ques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. www.geodiversitas.com 851 Macchiarelli R. et al. RÉSUMÉ Ouranopithecus macedoniensis (Mammalia, Primates, Hominoidea) : reconstruction virtuelle et analyse 3D d’une denture inférieure juvénile (RPl-82 et RPl-83). L’épaisseur de l’émail dentaire est couramment incluse parmi les traits diagnos- tiques pour l’attribution taxinomique et la reconstruction phylogénétique dans l’étude des hominidés fossiles, et elle est aussi utilisée comme indicateur d’ha- bitudes alimentaires et de conditions paléoenvironnementales. Cependant, peu MOTS CLÉS d’informations quantitatives sont disponibles à ce jour concernant sa variation Mammalia, Primates, topographique dans les couronnes déciduales des primates fossiles. Grâce à la Ouranopithecus, microtomographie à haute résolution, nous avons exploré la morphologie struc- hominidé, Miocène, turale interne de la denture inférieure mixte d’Ouranopithecus macedoniensis, un denture mixte, grand singe du Miocène supérieur de Macédoine, Grèce. Par rapport aux grands microtomographie, singes africains actuels et à Homo, O. macedoniensis montre une diff érence signi- endostructure dentaire, reconstruction 3D, fi cative dans l’épaisseur de l’émail occlusal entre la deuxième molaire déciduale, épaisseur de l’émail. relativement fi ne, et la première molaire permanente, très épaisse. INTRODUCTION Th e individual, likely a male whose age at death has been estimated between 3.5 and 6 years (Kou- Ouranopithecus macedoniensis (Bonis & Melentis, fos & Bonis 2004), is represented by two fragments, 1977) is a late Miocene large-bodied ape currently RPl-82 (left partial ramus) and RPl-83 (right par- known from three localities in Macedonia, Greece: tial ramus). According to its original description, Ravin de la Pluie (RPl) and Xirochori (XIR), in the left fragment preserves in situ three erupted the valley of the Axios River, and Nikiti-1 (NKT), deciduous teeth, all in occlusion: the lateral in- in the Chalkidi peninsula, east of Th essaloniki cisor (Li2), the canine (Lc), and the fi rst molar (Bonis & Koufos 2001). Th e associated mam- (Lm1). On radiographic ground, the presence malian fauna, which globally indicates an open of the third premolar crown (LP3) has been also environment (Bonis et al. 1999; Merceron et al. reported (Koufos & Bonis 2004). On the larger 2005a, 2007), suggests a late Vallesian age (MN RPl-83 right fragment, the following deciduous 10). More precisely, the magnetostratigraphic record and permanent erupted elements are visible: the available for the two northern sites of the Axios deciduous canine (Rc), both deciduous molars valley indicates the interval 9.6-9.3 Ma (Sen et al. (Rm1 and Rm2), and the fully erupted, unworn 2000), while the faunal assemblage from Nikiti fi rst permanent molar (RM1). In addition, par- points to a slightly younger age, within the interval tially embedded in a hard matrix, the permanent 9.3-8.7 Ma (Koufos 2000). crowns of the permanent central incisor (RI1), of Firstly discovered in 1973 in the Axios valley both lateral incisors (LI2 and RI2), and of the ca- (Bonis et al. 1974), Ouranopithecus Bonis & Me- nine (RC) can be traced. On the same specimen, lentis, 1977 is currently represented by cranial the presence of both permanent premolars (RP3 and mandibular remains and, mostly, from a large and RP4) has been recorded through radiography sample of isolated permanent teeth (Bonis et al. and cross-sectional computed tomography images 1975, 1990, 1998; Koufos 1993, 1995; Bonis & (Koufos & Bonis 2004). Koufos 1993; Koufos & Bonis 2006). Th e man- Specimens bearing a mixed dentition are rare in dibular remains of a young individual from the c. the non-human hominid and, to a lesser extent, 9.3 Ma site of Ravin de la Pluie, bearing a partial hominin fossil record (see review in Hartwig 2002; mixed dentition, have been discovered for the fi rst Schwartz & Tattersall 2005; for the largest sample time in 2001 and reported in 2004 (Koufos & of deciduous teeth for any species of fossil ape, see Bonis 2004). Mortzou & Andrews 2008), and the information 852 GEODIVERSITAS • 2009 • 31 (4) Ouranopithecus virtual dentition currently available on dental inner structural or- (Mercury Computer Systems Inc.) and Artecore ganization, including tissue proportions and enamel v.1.0 (Nespos Society). Th reshold values between thickness topographic variation of fossil primate taxa segmented components were found according to mostly concerns permanent teeth (see Olejniczak the methodology of Spoor et al. (1993). et al. 2008a, b). Th e assessment of the relative developmental Here we present preliminary evidence on the struc- stages of RPL-82 and RPL-83 deciduous and per- tural morphology of deciduous and permanent front manent dental elements are based on the scoring and cheek crowns of Ouranopithecus macedoniensis systems established by Demirjian et al. (1973) and based on the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruc- by Liversidge and Molleson (2004), recently revised tion and quantitative analysis of the high-resolution and integrated by Bayle et al. (2009a). microtomographic record of the two mandibular For individual measurements, crowns were digit- portions from Ravin de la Pluie (Koufos & Bonis ally isolated from roots following Olejniczak et al. 2004). More specifi cally, we comparatively assess (2008c), and surface rendering was performed using enamel thickness topography and proportions in its triangulation and constrained smoothing from the second deciduous and fi rst permanent molars. volumetric data (Lorensen & Cline 1987). In the case of the right deciduous second molar (Rm2) and of the permanent fi rst molar (RM1), enamel METHODS thickness variation was assessed on the buccolingual (BL) mesial section through metaconid-protoconid Th e microtomographic (μCT) acquisition and (BLm), the BL distal section through entoconid- reconstruction of RPL-82 and RPL-83 have been hypoconid (BLd), the mesiodistal (MD) lingual performed in 2002 at the Bundesanstalt für Material- section through metaconid-entoconid (MDl), forschung und -prüfung (BAM) of Berlin (http:// and the MD buccal section through protoconid- www.ct.bam.de/). A high-resolution 3D-tomograph hypoconid (MDb) (see Macchiarelli et al. 2004). equipped with a unique bipolar 320 kV micro fo- Th e following linear, surface, and volumetric vari- cal X-ray tube combined with a fl at panel detector ables have been measured on 2-3D reconstructions: of 1024 × 1024 pixels has been used. Scans para- total crown surface area; surface area of the enamel- meters were as follow: 240 kV tube voltage; 0.05 dentine junction (EDJ); volume of the enamel mA tube current; 0.25 mm Sn V-fi lter; 1200 (each cap; volume of the coronal dentine (including the 0.3°) and 900 (each 0.4°) respectively for RPL-82 coronal aspect of the pulp chamber); average enamel and RPL83. Reconstructions of the fi nal volumes thickness (AET; total volume of the enamel/EDJ (isotropic voxel size of 50 μm) have been done with surface area); average of minimum enamel thick- Advanced Visualization Software v6.1 (AVS, Inc.). ness (average of the minimum thickness between Virtual cross-sections 3D rendering were done at each outer enamel surface element and all the ERM, Poitiers (http://www.erm-poitiers.fr) by elements representing the EDJ); maximum radial means
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    Dryopithecins, Darwin, de Bonis, and the European origin of the African apes and human clade David R. BEGUN University of Toronto, Department of Anthropology, 19 Russell Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S2 (Canada) [email protected] Begun R. D. 2009. — Dryopithecins, Darwin, de Bonis, and the European origin of the African apes and human clade. Geodiversitas 31 (4) : 789-816. ABSTRACT Darwin famously opined that the most likely place of origin of the common ancestor of African apes and humans is Africa, given the distribution of its liv- ing descendents. But it is infrequently recalled that immediately afterwards, Darwin, in his typically thorough and cautious style, noted that a fossil ape from Europe, Dryopithecus, may instead represent the ancestors of African apes, which dispersed into Africa from Europe. Louis de Bonis and his collaborators were the fi rst researchers in the modern era to echo Darwin’s suggestion about apes from Europe. Resulting from their spectacular discoveries in Greece over several decades, de Bonis and colleagues have shown convincingly that African KEY WORDS ape and human clade members (hominines) lived in Europe at least 9.5 million Mammalia, years ago. Here I review the fossil record of hominoids in Europe as it relates to Primates, Dryopithecus, the origins of the hominines. While I diff er in some details with Louis, we are Hispanopithecus, in complete agreement on the importance of Europe in determining the fate Rudapithecus, of the African ape and human clade. Th ere is no doubt that Louis de Bonis is Ouranopithecus, hominine origins, a pioneer in advancing our understanding of this fascinating time in our evo- new subtribe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Threads of Evolutionary, Behavioural and Conservation Research
    Taxonomic Tapestries The Threads of Evolutionary, Behavioural and Conservation Research Taxonomic Tapestries The Threads of Evolutionary, Behavioural and Conservation Research Edited by Alison M Behie and Marc F Oxenham Chapters written in honour of Professor Colin P Groves Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Taxonomic tapestries : the threads of evolutionary, behavioural and conservation research / Alison M Behie and Marc F Oxenham, editors. ISBN: 9781925022360 (paperback) 9781925022377 (ebook) Subjects: Biology--Classification. Biology--Philosophy. Human ecology--Research. Coexistence of species--Research. Evolution (Biology)--Research. Taxonomists. Other Creators/Contributors: Behie, Alison M., editor. Oxenham, Marc F., editor. Dewey Number: 578.012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press Cover photograph courtesy of Hajarimanitra Rambeloarivony Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2015 ANU Press Contents List of Contributors . .vii List of Figures and Tables . ix PART I 1. The Groves effect: 50 years of influence on behaviour, evolution and conservation research . 3 Alison M Behie and Marc F Oxenham PART II 2 . Characterisation of the endemic Sulawesi Lenomys meyeri (Muridae, Murinae) and the description of a new species of Lenomys . 13 Guy G Musser 3 . Gibbons and hominoid ancestry . 51 Peter Andrews and Richard J Johnson 4 .
    [Show full text]
  • Unravelling the Positional Behaviour of Fossil Hominoids: Morphofunctional and Structural Analysis of the Primate Hindlimb
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Doctorado en Biodiversitat Facultad de Ciènces Tesis doctoral Unravelling the positional behaviour of fossil hominoids: Morphofunctional and structural analysis of the primate hindlimb Marta Pina Miguel 2016 Memoria presentada por Marta Pina Miguel para optar al grado de Doctor por la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, programa de doctorado en Biodiversitat del Departamento de Biologia Animal, de Biologia Vegetal i d’Ecologia (Facultad de Ciències). Este trabajo ha sido dirigido por el Dr. Salvador Moyà Solà (Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont) y el Dr. Sergio Almécija Martínez (The George Washington Univertisy). Director Co-director Dr. Salvador Moyà Solà Dr. Sergio Almécija Martínez A mis padres y hermana. Y a todas aquelas personas que un día decidieron perseguir un sueño Contents Acknowledgments [in Spanish] 13 Abstract 19 Resumen 21 Section I. Introduction 23 Hominoid positional behaviour The great apes of the Vallès-Penedès Basin: State-of-the-art Section II. Objectives 55 Section III. Material and Methods 59 Hindlimb fossil remains of the Vallès-Penedès hominoids Comparative sample Area of study: The Vallès-Penedès Basin Methodology: Generalities and principles Section IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 - Introduction
    EURASIAN MIDDLE AND LATE MIOCENE HOMINOID PALEOBIOGEOGRAPHY AND THE GEOGRAPHIC ORIGINS OF THE HOMININAE by Mariam C. Nargolwalla A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Anthropology University of Toronto © Copyright by M. Nargolwalla (2009) Eurasian Middle and Late Miocene Hominoid Paleobiogeography and the Geographic Origins of the Homininae Mariam C. Nargolwalla Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology University of Toronto 2009 Abstract The origin and diversification of great apes and humans is among the most researched and debated series of events in the evolutionary history of the Primates. A fundamental part of understanding these events involves reconstructing paleoenvironmental and paleogeographic patterns in the Eurasian Miocene; a time period and geographic expanse rich in evidence of lineage origins and dispersals of numerous mammalian lineages, including apes. Traditionally, the geographic origin of the African ape and human lineage is considered to have occurred in Africa, however, an alternative hypothesis favouring a Eurasian origin has been proposed. This hypothesis suggests that that after an initial dispersal from Africa to Eurasia at ~17Ma and subsequent radiation from Spain to China, fossil apes disperse back to Africa at least once and found the African ape and human lineage in the late Miocene. The purpose of this study is to test the Eurasian origin hypothesis through the analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of distribution, in situ evolution, interprovincial and intercontinental dispersals of Eurasian terrestrial mammals in response to environmental factors. Using the NOW and Paleobiology databases, together with data collected through survey and excavation of middle and late Miocene vertebrate localities in Hungary and Romania, taphonomic bias and sampling completeness of Eurasian faunas are assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Language
    Origin of language The origin of language in the human species has been the topic of scholarly discussions for several centuries. There is no consensus on the origin or age of human language. The topic is difficult to study because of the lack of direct evidence. Consequently, scholars wishing to study the origins of language must draw inferences from other kinds of evidence such as the fossil record, archaeological evidence, contemporary language diversity, studies of language acquisition, and comparisons between human language and systems of communication existing among other animals (particularly other primates). Many argue that the origins of language probably relate closely to the origins of modern human behavior, but there is little agreement about the implications and directionality of this connection. This shortage of empirical evidence has led many scholars to regard the entire topic as unsuitable for serious study. In 1866, the Linguistic Society of Paris banned any existing or future debates on the subject, a prohibition which remained influential across much of the western world until late in the twentieth century.[1] Today, there are various hypotheses about how, why, when, and where language might have emerged.[2] Despite this, there is scarcely more agreement today than a hundred years ago, when Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection provoked a rash of armchair speculation on the topic.[3] Since the early 1990s, however, a number of linguists, archaeologists, psychologists, anthropologists, and others
    [Show full text]
  • The Mysterious Phylogeny of Gigantopithecus
    Kimberly Nail Department ofAnthropology University ofTennessee - Knoxville The Mysterious Phylogeny of Gigantopithecus Perhaps the most questionable attribute given to Gigantopithecus is its taxonomic and phylogenetic placement in the superfamily Hominoidea. In 1935 von Koenigswald made the first discovery ofa lower molar at an apothecary in Hong Kong. In a mess of"dragon teeth" von Koenigswald saw a tooth that looked remarkably primate-like and purchased it; this tooth would later be one offour looked at by a skeptical friend, Franz Weidenreich. It was this tooth that von Koenigswald originally used to name the species Gigantopithecus blacki. Researchers have only four mandibles and thousands ofteeth which they use to reconstruct not only the existence ofthis primate, but its size and phylogeny as well. Many objections have been raised to the past phylogenetic relationship proposed by Weidenreich, Woo, and von Koenigswald that Gigantopithecus was a forerunner to the hominid line. Some suggest that researchers might be jumping the gun on the size attributed to Gigantopithecus (estimated between 10 and 12 feet tall); this size has perpetuated the idea that somehow Gigantopithecus is still roaming the Himalayas today as Bigfoot. Many researchers have shunned the Bigfoot theory and focused on the causes of the animals extinction. It is my intention to explain the theories ofthe past and why many researchers currently disagree with them. It will be necessary to explain how the researchers conducted their experiments and came to their conclusions as well. The Research The first anthropologist to encounter Gigantopithecus was von Koenigswald who happened upon them in a Hong Kong apothecary selling "dragon teeth." Due to their large size one may not even have thought that they belonged to any sort ofprimate, however von Koenigswald knew better because ofthe markings on the molar.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Models for Evaluating Variation and Sexual Dimorphism in Fossil Hominoid Samples Jeremiah E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 140:253–264 (2009) Beyond Gorilla and Pongo: Alternative Models for Evaluating Variation and Sexual Dimorphism in Fossil Hominoid Samples Jeremiah E. Scott,1* Caitlin M. Schrein,1 and Jay Kelley2 1School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4101 2Department of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612 KEY WORDS bootstrap; dental variation; Lufengpithecus; Ouranopithecus; Sivapithecus ABSTRACT Sexual size dimorphism in the postca- cies. Using these samples, we also evaluated molar dimor- nine dentition of the late Miocene hominoid Lufengpithe- phism and taxonomic composition in two other Miocene cus lufengensis exceeds that in Pongo pygmaeus, demon- ape samples—Ouranopithecus macedoniensis from strating that the maximum degree of molar size dimor- Greece, specimens of which can be sexed based on associ- phism in apes is not represented among the extant ated canines and P3s, and the Sivapithecus sample from Hominoidea. It has not been established, however, that Haritalyangar, India. Ouranopithecus is more dimorphic the molars of Pongo are more dimorphic than those of than the extant taxa but is similar to Lufengpithecus, any other living primate. In this study, we used resam- demonstrating that the level of molar dimorphism pling-based methods to compare molar dimorphism in required for the Greek fossil sample under the single-spe- Gorilla, Pongo,andLufengpithecus to that in the papio- cies taxonomy is not unprecedented when the compara- nin Mandrillus leucophaeus to test two hypotheses: tive framework is expanded to include extinct primates. (1) Pongo possesses the most size-dimorphic molars In contrast, the Haritalyangar Sivapithecus sample, if among living primates and (2) molar size dimorphism in it represents a single species, exhibits substantially Lufengpithecus is greater than that in the most dimorphic greater molar dimorphism than does Lufengpithecus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unique Middle Miocene European Hominoid and the Origins of the Great Ape and Human Clade Salvador Moya` -Sola` A,1, David M
    A unique Middle Miocene European hominoid and the origins of the great ape and human clade Salvador Moya` -Sola` a,1, David M. Albab,c, Sergio Alme´ cijac, Isaac Casanovas-Vilarc, Meike Ko¨ hlera, Soledad De Esteban-Trivignoc, Josep M. Roblesc,d, Jordi Galindoc, and Josep Fortunyc aInstitucio´Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avanc¸ats at Institut Catala`de Paleontologia (ICP) and Unitat d’Antropologia Biolo`gica (Dipartimento de Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal, i Ecologia), Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, Edifici ICP, Campus de Bellaterra s/n, 08193 Cerdanyola del Valle`s, Barcelona, Spain; bDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita`degli Studi di Firenze, Via G. La Pira 4, 50121 Florence, Italy; cInstitut Catala`de Paleontologia, Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, Edifici ICP, Campus de Bellaterra s/n, 08193 Cerdanyola del Valle`s, Barcelona, Spain; and dFOSSILIA Serveis Paleontolo`gics i Geolo`gics, S.L. c/ Jaume I nu´m 87, 1er 5a, 08470 Sant Celoni, Barcelona, Spain Edited by David Pilbeam, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved March 4, 2009 (received for review November 20, 2008) The great ape and human clade (Primates: Hominidae) currently sediments by the diggers and bulldozers. After 6 years of includes orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos, and humans. fieldwork, 150 fossiliferous localities have been sampled from the When, where, and from which taxon hominids evolved are among 300-m-thick local stratigraphic series of ACM, which spans an the most exciting questions yet to be resolved. Within the Afro- interval of 1 million years (Ϸ12.5–11.3 Ma, Late Aragonian, pithecidae, the Kenyapithecinae (Kenyapithecini ؉ Equatorini) Middle Miocene).
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Primate Evolution
    8. Primate Evolution Jonathan M. G. Perry, Ph.D., The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Stephanie L. Canington, B.A., The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Learning Objectives • Understand the major trends in primate evolution from the origin of primates to the origin of our own species • Learn about primate adaptations and how they characterize major primate groups • Discuss the kinds of evidence that anthropologists use to find out how extinct primates are related to each other and to living primates • Recognize how the changing geography and climate of Earth have influenced where and when primates have thrived or gone extinct The first fifty million years of primate evolution was a series of adaptive radiations leading to the diversification of the earliest lemurs, monkeys, and apes. The primate story begins in the canopy and understory of conifer-dominated forests, with our small, furtive ancestors subsisting at night, beneath the notice of day-active dinosaurs. From the archaic plesiadapiforms (archaic primates) to the earliest groups of true primates (euprimates), the origin of our own order is characterized by the struggle for new food sources and microhabitats in the arboreal setting. Climate change forced major extinctions as the northern continents became increasingly dry, cold, and seasonal and as tropical rainforests gave way to deciduous forests, woodlands, and eventually grasslands. Lemurs, lorises, and tarsiers—once diverse groups containing many species—became rare, except for lemurs in Madagascar where there were no anthropoid competitors and perhaps few predators. Meanwhile, anthropoids (monkeys and apes) emerged in the Old World, then dispersed across parts of the northern hemisphere, Africa, and ultimately South America.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unique Middle Miocene European Hominoid and the Origins of the Great Ape and Human Clade
    A unique Middle Miocene European hominoid and the origins of the great ape and human clade Salvador Moya` -Sola` a,1, David M. Albab,c, Sergio Alme´ cijac, Isaac Casanovas-Vilarc, Meike Ko¨ hlera, Soledad De Esteban-Trivignoc, Josep M. Roblesc,d, Jordi Galindoc, and Josep Fortunyc aInstitucio´Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avanc¸ats at Institut Catala`de Paleontologia (ICP) and Unitat d’Antropologia Biolo`gica (Dipartimento de Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal, i Ecologia), Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, Edifici ICP, Campus de Bellaterra s/n, 08193 Cerdanyola del Valle`s, Barcelona, Spain; bDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita`degli Studi di Firenze, Via G. La Pira 4, 50121 Florence, Italy; cInstitut Catala`de Paleontologia, Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, Edifici ICP, Campus de Bellaterra s/n, 08193 Cerdanyola del Valle`s, Barcelona, Spain; and dFOSSILIA Serveis Paleontolo`gics i Geolo`gics, S.L. c/ Jaume I nu´m 87, 1er 5a, 08470 Sant Celoni, Barcelona, Spain Edited by David Pilbeam, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved March 4, 2009 (received for review November 20, 2008) The great ape and human clade (Primates: Hominidae) currently sediments by the diggers and bulldozers. After 6 years of includes orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos, and humans. fieldwork, 150 fossiliferous localities have been sampled from the When, where, and from which taxon hominids evolved are among 300-m-thick local stratigraphic series of ACM, which spans an the most exciting questions yet to be resolved. Within the Afro- interval of 1 million years (Ϸ12.5–11.3 Ma, Late Aragonian, pithecidae, the Kenyapithecinae (Kenyapithecini ؉ Equatorini) Middle Miocene).
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Primates
    AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education Page 1 of 16 www.accessscience.com Fossil primates Contributed by: Eric Delson Publication year: 2014 Extinct members of the order of mammals to which humans belong. All current classifications divide the living primates into two major groups (suborders): the Strepsirhini or “lower” primates (lemurs, lorises, and bushbabies) and the Haplorhini or “higher” primates [tarsiers and anthropoids (New and Old World monkeys, greater and lesser apes, and humans)]. Some fossil groups (omomyiforms and adapiforms) can be placed with or near these two extant groupings; however, there is contention whether the Plesiadapiformes represent the earliest relatives of primates and are best placed within the order (as here) or outside it. See also: FOSSIL; MAMMALIA; PHYLOGENY; PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY; PRIMATES. Vast evidence suggests that the order Primates is a monophyletic group, that is, the primates have a common genetic origin. Although several peculiarities of the primate bauplan (body plan) appear to be inherited from an inferred common ancestor, it seems that the order as a whole is characterized by showing a variety of parallel adaptations in different groups to a predominantly arboreal lifestyle, including anatomical and behavioral complexes related to improved grasping and manipulative capacities, a variety of locomotor styles, and enlargement of the higher centers of the brain. Among the extant primates, the lower primates more closely resemble forms that evolved relatively early in the history of the order, whereas the higher primates represent a group that evolved more recently (Fig. 1). A classification of the primates, as accepted here, appears above. Early primates The earliest primates are placed in their own semiorder, Plesiadapiformes (as contrasted with the semiorder Euprimates for all living forms), because they have no direct evolutionary links with, and bear few adaptive resemblances to, any group of living primates.
    [Show full text]
  • Postcranial Evidence of Late Miocene Hominin Bipedalism in Chad
    Postcranial evidence of late Miocene hominin bipedalism in Chad Franck Guy ( [email protected] ) Université de Poitiers / CNRS UMR 7262 - PALEVOPRIM Paléontologie, Evolution, Paléo-écosytèmes, Paléoprimatologie Guillaume Daver CNRS, UMR 7262 Hassane Taisso Mackaye Université de N'Djamena Andossa Likius Université de N'Djamena - Faculté de Sciences Exactes et Appliquées -Département de Paléontologie Jean-Renaud Boisserie Université de Poitiers and CNRS Abderamane Moussa Université de N'Djamena - Faculté de Sciences Exactes et Appliquées -Département de Paléontologie Patrick Vignaud CNRS UMR 6046 Clarisse Nekoulnang Centre National de Développement et de la Recherches (CNRD) - Service de Conservation et Valorisation des Fossiles Research Article Keywords: Terrestrial bipedal, Miocene hominins, postcranial remains DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-69453/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/18 Abstract Terrestrial bipedal locomotion is one of the key adaptations deƒning the hominin clade. Evidences of undisputed bipedalism are known from postcranial remains of late Miocene hominins as soon as 6 Ma in eastern Africa. Bipedality of Sahelanthropus tchadensis was hitherto documented at 7 Ma in central Africa (Chad) by cranial evidence. Here, we present the ƒrst postcranial evidence of the locomotor behavior of the Chadian hominin with new insights on bipedalism at the early stage of our evolutionary history. The original material was discovered at locality TM 266 (Toros-Menalla fossiliferous area), and consists in one left femur and two antimeric ulnae. These new ƒndings conƒrm that hominins were already terrestrial biped relatively soon after the human-chimpanzee divergence but also suggest that careful climbing arboreal behaviors was still a signiƒcant part of their locomotor repertoire.
    [Show full text]