Kern County Sheriff Data Trackers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kern County Sheriff Data Trackers Kern County Sheriff Data Trackers Arrest Stats Programs Crime Stats Jail Incidents January 1, 2013 - March 31, 2013 January 1, 2013 - March 31, 2013 Jan Feb Mar Total Total Released to Sheriff Reported Crimes: 822 Total Rise in Jail Incidents 2% NNN 180 152 159 491 Programs from Jail Part I # % to PY Flash 19 27 29 75 Faith Based 1 Assaults on Staff 7 PRCS 127 149 159 435 Homicide 3 ‐57.14% 3056 348 297 333 978 Mental Health 10 Inmate Fights 137 Rape 17 ‐34.62% Released Re‐Arrested Rehab 9 Safety Cell Usage 27 NNN 364 353 Burglary 1,019 7.72% Flash 69 63 EMP 616 Crimes in Jail 18 PRCS 361 235 GTA 508 18.69% 3056 585 562 Sheriff Parole 183 Suicide Watch 345 Robbery 120 20.00% Did you know?? Work Release 3 EID Device Usage 7 Average Daily Population increased 8% Part II # % to PY Avg. Length of stay for Felons down 11% Total Released to Drugs/Narcotics 1,125 65.20% Percentage of Gang 91% of inmates in‐custody are felons Virtual Jail 59% Members Loitering/ 802 Bed Space Saved 47 ‐58.04% Jail Population/Demographics Tresspassing Child Support Services 32 Substance Abuse Certificates earned Vandalism 350 ‐12.50% from January 1 ‐ March 31, 2013 Average Daily Arrests 134 Inmates Seen 556 Outside Resources 10 Anger Management Certificates earned 2687 from January 1‐March 31, 2013 Average Daily Population Child Support 9 ETR Referral Program Cases Reset 124 Inmates in "Virtual Custody" have been 3,812 inmates have registered for BAS Total County Jail Beds 2844 referred for services. from January 2013 to present. Total Amount $4,797 KMC Referral Numbers 36 inmates have been referred to the License Released 1 Since 2012, 300 inmates have 88% Male 12% Female Kern Medical Health Plan. This has generated participated in the Sheriff's Matrix Genetic Testing $263,400.50 in revenue for medical costs for 30 Program Services Provided inmates. AB 109 DATA TRACKERS Kern County Probation Department DASHBOARD REPORT FY 12/13 - 3rd Quarter January 1, 2013 - March 31, 2013 Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Recidivism (PRCS) - Cumulative PRCS - by Gender Total PRCS 9% Actual Pkts Add'l % - Orig Felony Recidivism Month Total Number Received CDCR Projs Cases Rate Convicted of a New Felony Law Violation Male October 2011 161 28% 1,000 1,700 35.7% November 2011 309 134% Female December 2011 260 116% Number of Days To Recidivate (Cumulative) January 2012 227 127% Avg Days Min Days Max Days 91% February 2012 150 60% 199 14 521 March 2012 142 89% Arrests (Cumulative) PRCS Recidivism - by Gender April 2012 115 49% Number of Persons Arrested Total Arrests/Bookings 907 May 2012 135 93% 1,149 2,573 1000 June 2012 115 55% Probation Officer Caseload Ratio (PRCS) 93 July 2012 106 61% As of June 30, 2012 APPA Nat'l Standard Current 0 August 2012 95 42% Male 87 : 1 50 : 1 84 : 1 Female September 2012 93 90% October 2012 70 9% Interesting Facts November 2012 76 49% December 2012 80 45% Static Risk Assessment* January 2013 60 25% PRCS February 2013 62 82% (*offender's risk to recidivate) Mandatory Sup March 2013 57 21% Totals 2,313 71% 50.0% Felony Probation Mandatory Felony Probation Total Probation 50.0% Active PRCS Supervision (MS) (FP) Increase 40.0% 30.0% 30.4% 580 2,773 1,683 510 24.1% 24.3% 27.0% 30.0% 24.5% 18.4% 20.9% Day Reporting Center (caseload) 20.0% 14.8% 9.9% 9.4% 100 Participants 100% Capacity 5.9% 6.6% 10.0% 3.7% Day Reporting Center Program Services: •Assessment •Cognitive/Life Skills •Anger Management 0.0% •Behavior Change Plan •Parenting/Family •Referrals •Domestic Violence •Educational Svcs •Discharge Planning •Aftercare •Budgeting/Money Mgt •Job Readiness/Search •Daily Check-In •Alcohol/Substance Abuse Testing AB 109 DATA TRACKERS DASHBOARD REPORT FY 12/13 - 3rd Quarter January 1, 2013 - March 31, 2013 Mental Health Services Substance Abuse Services By Probation Status By Probation Status Post Release Community Supervision 131 22.4% Post Release Community Supervision 70 12.2% Felony Probation 294 50.3% Felony Probation 355 62.1% Mandatory Supervision 29 5.0% Mandatory Supervision 26 4.5% Non, Non, Nons 112 19.1% Non, Non, Nons 74 12.9% In-Custody/Matrix 19 3.2% In-Custody/Matrix 47 8.2% 585 100.0% 572 100.0% Geographic Area Interesting Facts Geographic Area Interesting Facts Bakersfield 89.9% Gender: Male - 71% Female - 29% Bakersfield 72.5% Gender: Male - 67.1% Female - 32.9% Eastern KC 4.4% Age: 18-44 74.1% Eastern KC 10.3% Age: 18-44 79.7% Northern KC 3.6% Marital Status: Never Married 55.7% Northern KC 7.4% Marital Status: Never Married 55.8% West/South KC 2.1% Veteran: 4.2% West/South KC 9.8% Veteran: 3.0% 100.0% 100.0% Pay Source Pay Source Medi-Cal 20.0% Medi-Cal 17.9% MediCare 0.0% MediCare 1.7% Private Insurance 0.1% Private Insurance 0.5% Kern Health Systems (KMC Health Plan) 0.1% Kern Health Systems (KMC Health Plan) 2.7% CalWorks 0.1% CalWorks 0.3% SACPA/Felony Drug Court/Parolee Services 3.1% SAPT 27.3% State Vocational Rehab (OTES) 0.2% AB109 SA Program 13.8% 74.6% 37.5% Unfunded (indigent) Unfunded (indigent) Types of Services Delivered Individual/ Substance Case Counseling Abuse Family Services Medication Group Therapy Treatment Management AB 109 DATA TRACKERS DASHBOARD REPORT FY 12/13 - 3rd Quarter January 1, 2013 - March 31, 2013 Referrals Enrollments Employment Referred by Probation (Qtr/from 2-1-12) Number Enrolled (Qtr/from 2-1-12) Number Employed (Qtr/2-1-12) 91 / 385 27 / 142 22 / 69 25 Referrals by Offender Classification Male 21 Female Percent of Enrolled Employed (Current Qtr) 20#REF! #REF! 24% / 49% Felony Probation Mandatory Sup 15 Interesting Factoid 27 2 30% Median Age: 2% 10 6 35 / 34 5 Post Release Number Enrolled Receiving Food 62 0 Stamps 68% Male Female 14 / 55 Services Provided Retention and Profession Facts Number Enrolled Barriers to Employment Work Force Investment (WIA) Retention by Offender Classification - six months after entry into (Current Qtr) Low Income Individual employment Resume' 20 •27 Assistance 18 > Five (5) participants are working two 18 jobs; one (1) is working 3 jobs 16 Disabled 14 •4 Community Interviewing > Two participants have the 12 Resource Felony Probation Information Workshops title of "Supervisor" 10 8 Single Parent 8 Post Release •2 Mandatory Sup > 41 of the participants work 40 or more 6 hours per week 4 1 Substance Abuse Individual Job Job Squad 2 Search (employment •2 Assistance opportunities) > One (1) participant started AB 109 Paid 0 Work Experience Program with large air Felony Post Release Mandatory Sup conditioning company Probation Missing I9 Documents •32 ( 10 ) High School ( 17 ) Working ( 0 ) H.S. ( 0 ) Educational Level of Enrolled (Current Qtr): Dropout Toward GED Graduate or GED Some College Homeless •1 Pregnant/Parenting Youth •0 STREET INTERDICTION TEAM (SIT) OPERATIONS AB 109 DATA TRACKERS DASHBOARD REPORT FY 12/13 - 3rd Quarter January 1, 2013 - March 31, 2013 Operations Map Location of Operations Number of Operations 4 Number of Locations 4 Shafter Number of Days 4 Ridgecrest Taft Number of Agencies 13 Delano SIT Participating Agencies During Reporting Period Arvin Police Department Kern County Sheriff's Office Bakersfield Police Department KHSD Police Department Bear Valley Springs Police Department Ridgecrest Police Department California City Policy Department Shafter Police Department Delano Police Department Taft Police Department McFarland Police Department Tehachapi Police Department Kern County Probation Department Partner Agencies/Organizations Target Information Bishop Police Department Naval Criminal Investigative Service Bureau of Land Management Department of Alcohol Beverage Control Shafter Ridgecrest Taft Delano Totals California Highway Patrol Immigration and Customs Enforcement Inyo County Sheriff's Department Department of Fish and Game AB 109 Planned Targets 44 46 24 71 185 State Parole U.S. Marshals Arrests Interesting Facts AB 109 Targets Attempted 16 46 28 48 138 Items Seized 70 64 Total Arrests* During SIT Operations: AB 109 Targets Located 14 19 14 34 81 60 Felony Arrests 50 Cash: $1,700 AB 109 Non-Targets Contacted 8 26 18 8 60 40 Misdemeanor Guns: 3 weapons & Identified 30 23 25 Arrests Narcotics: Methamphetamine 20 Viol. PRCS/Prob Various Pills Probation/Parole Searches 15 62 16 40 133 8 Arrest 10 5 Heroin # of Flash Marijuana Gang Affiliations 0 0 6 2 8 0 Incarcerations Upcoming Target Operation Areas Narcotics Violations 5 27 6 2 40 Flash Incarcerations 1 1 3 0 5 California Arvin Bakersfield Delano Shafter City SIT Personnel Assigned 24 35 31 29 119 DISTRICT ATTORNEY AB 109 DATA TRACKERS DASHBOARD REPORT FY 12/13 - 3rd Quarter January 1, 2013 - March 31, 2013 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 Branch Type +/ (-) +/(-)% +/ (-) +/(-)% +/ (-) +/(-)% 1st Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr Requests - Felony 125 329 204 163.2% 186 119 -67 -36.0% 153 160 7 4.6% Filings - Felony 91 101 10 11.0% 89 84 -5 -5.6% 94 108 14 14.9% Arvin/Lamont Filings - Misdemeanor 597 463 -134 -22.4% 532 395 -137 -25.8% 609 366 -243 -39.9% Requests - Felony 3,238 3,787 549 17.0% 3,531 4,258 727 20.6% 4,348 4,297 -51 -1.2% Filings - Felony 1,260 1,435 175 13.9% 1,172 1,628 456 38.9% 1,293 1,630 337 26.1% Bakersfield Filings - Misdemeanor 4,039 4,453 414 10.3% 3,615 3,825 210 5.8% 4,236 4,026 -210 -5.0% Requests - Felony 94 101 7 7.4% 114 212 98 86.0% 123 184 61 49.6% Filings - Felony 97 88 -9 -9.3% 108 96 -12 -11.1% 107 100 -7 -6.5% Delano Filings - Misdemeanor 403 396 -7 -1.7% 372 296 -76 -20.4% 344 344 0 0.0% Requests - Felony 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% Filings - Felony 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% Lake Isabella
Recommended publications
  • Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency for California
    Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency for California Fiscal Year 2016 Agency Name Agency Type Cash Value Sales Proceeds Totals Alameda County District Attorney's Office Local $10,996 $0 $10,996 Alameda County Narcotics Task Force Task Force $0 $84,324 $84,324 Alameda County Sheriff's Office Local $11,152 $0 $11,152 Alhambra Police Department Local $351,211 $0 $351,211 Anaheim Police Department Local $1,524,643 $0 $1,524,643 Arcadia Police Department Local $0 $51 $51 Azusa Police Department Local $519,313 $0 $519,313 Bakersfield Police Department Local $24,010 $9,236 $33,246 Bell Gardens Police Department Local $828,834 $0 $828,834 Butte County District Attorney Local $23,843 $41,259 $65,102 Butte County Sheriff's Office Local $146,314 $141,022 $287,336 Butte Interagency Narcotics Task Force (BINTF) Task Force $20,589 $80,066 $100,655 California Department Of Corrections And Rehabilitation State $80,402 $67,244 $147,646 California Department Of Justice (DOJ) - Division Of Law Enforcement State $156,871 $16,227 $173,098 Chula Vista Police Department Local $112,258 $2,000 $114,258 Citrus Heights Police Department Local $3,143 $7,895 $11,038 City Of Baldwin Park Police Department Local $134,442 $1,764 $136,206 City Of Beverly Hills Police Department Local $527,882 $17,540 $545,422 City Of Brawley Police Department Local $26,539 $0 $26,539 City Of Carlsbad Police Department Local $48,291 $2,000 $50,291 City Of Chino Police Department Local $149,103 $1,725 $150,828 City Of Coronado Police Department Local $48,291
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Data for California Law Enforcement 1991/92
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. EMPLOYMENT DATA FOR CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT 1991/92 - 1992/93 145590 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the p~rson or organization originating It. Points of view or opinions stated in this do.c~ment ~~e those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the offiCial position or pOlicies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by California Commission on Peace Officer Standards & Training to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further rep~duction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyrrght owner . • • EMPLOYMENT DATA FOR 0, CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT 1991/92 - 1992/93 • State of California Department of Justice Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training Information Services Bureau 1601 Alhambra Boulevard Sacramento, CA 95816-7083 @ Copyrighl 1993. California Commission on '. Peace 0fIi= Standards and Training .---------- Commission on Peace OMcer Standards and Training ---------........ • COMMISSIONERS Sherman Block Sheriff ., Chairman Los Angeles County Marcel L. Leduc Sergeant Vice-Chairman San Joaquin Co. Sheriffs Department Colleue Campbell Public Member Jody Hall-Esser Chief Administrative Officer City of Culver City Edward Hunt District Attorney Fresno County Ronald Lowenberg Chief of Police Huntington Beach Daniel E. Lungren Attorney General • Ex-Officio Member Raquel Montenegro Professor of Education C.S.U.LA. Manuel Ortega Chief of Police Placentia Police Dept. Bernard C. Parks Assistant Chief Los Angeles Police Dept. Devallis Rutledge Deputy District Attorney Orange County D.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Applicant Rankings by State
    Applicant Rankings by State *For additional information on the creation of these indices please see www.cops.usdoj.gov/Default.asp?Item=2208 **Note that this list contains 7,202 agencies. There were 58 agencies that were found to be ineligible for funding and 12 that withdrew after submitting applications, for a total of 7,272 applications received. Crime and Crime and Fiscal Need Community Final Index: Community Index: 0-50 Policing Index: 0- 0-100 Fiscal Need Policing Possible 50 Possible Possible Index Index Final Index State ORI Agency Name Points Points Points Percentile Percentile Percentile Akiachak Native Community Police AK AK002ZZ Department 31.20 36.75 67.95 99.9% 91.6% 99.9% AK AK085ZZ Tuluksak Native Community 21.18 39.44 60.62 98.5% 95.6% 99.2% AK AK038ZZ Akiak Native Community 18.85 38.40 57.25 96.7% 94.5% 98.0% AK AK033ZZ Manokotak, Village of 20.66 35.68 56.35 98.3% 89.4% 97.5% AK AK065ZZ Anvik Tribal Council 20.53 34.91 55.44 98.2% 87.6% 97.0% AK AK090ZZ Native Village of Kotlik 11.10 43.90 54.99 52.1% 98.9% 96.6% AK AK062ZZ Atmautluak Traditional Council 21.26 33.06 54.31 98.6% 82.7% 96.0% AK AK008ZZ Kwethluk, Organized Village of 25.85 25.97 51.82 99.7% 56.9% 93.8% AK AK057ZZ Gambell Police Department 20.37 30.93 51.30 98.1% 76.2% 93.0% AK AK095ZZ Alakanuk Tribal Council 22.18 26.44 48.61 99.0% 58.8% 89.4% AK AK00109 Sitka, City and Borough of 10.48 37.16 47.64 44.1% 92.3% 87.5% AK AK00102 Fairbank Department of Public Safety 11.64 35.25 46.89 58.8% 88.5% 85.8% AK AK00115 Yakutat Department of Public Safety 8.16 38.39 46.56 15.2% 94.5% 85.1% AK AK00101 Anchorage Police Department 13.52 31.27 44.79 77.3% 77.2% 80.7% AK AK00107 Petersburg Police Department 9.70 32.48 42.18 32.8% 81.3% 73.4% AK AK123ZZ Native Village of Napakiak 14.49 25.32 39.81 84.1% 54.2% 66.1% AK AK119ZZ City of Mekoryuk 12.65 26.94 39.59 69.7% 61.0% 65.4% Klawock Department of Public AK AK00135 Safety/Police Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Juvenile
    Open Facilities as of 7.27.21 Adult Juvenile COUNTY FACILITY BSCC# TYPE COUNTY FACILITY BSCC# TYPE Alameda Santa Rita Jail 65 II Alameda Alameda Camp Sweeney 7001 JH Alameda Juvenile Justice Court 121 CH Alameda Alameda County Juvenile Justice Facility 7003 Camp Alameda Wiley Manuel Courthouse 125 CH Butte Butte Juvenile Detention 7027 JH Alameda Fremont Hall of Justice 127 CHJ Butte Butte County Probation Camp Program 7029 Camp Alameda Hayward Hall of Justice 129 CHJ Contra Costa Contra Costa Juvenile Hall 7051 JH Alameda Berkeley Public Safety Center 165 I Contra Costa Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility 7054 Camp Alameda Fremont Police Facility 181 I Contra Costa Youthful Offender Treatment Program 7056 Camp Alameda Hayward Police Department 185 IJ Del Norte Del Norte Juvenile Hall 7065 JH Alameda Newark Police Department 200 THJ El Dorado So Lake Tahoe Juvenile Trtmnt Cntr 7079 JH Alameda Pleasanton Police Department 240 THJ El Dorado South Tahoe Challenge Camp 7081 Camp Alameda San Leandro City Jail 280 THJ Fresno Fresno Co. Juvenile Justice Campus 7088 JH Alameda Union City Police Department 300 THJ Fresno Juvenile Justice Campus Commitment Facility 7089 Camp Amador Amador County Jail 320 II Humboldt Humboldt County Juvenile Hall 7113 JH Amador Amador County Court Holding 325 CH Humboldt Humboldt Regional Center 7116 JH Butte Butte County Jail 340 II Imperial Imperial County Juvenile Hall 7126 JH Butte Butte County Court Holding 355 CH Inyo Inyo County Special Purpose Juvenile Hall 7136 SPJH Butte Chico City Jail 370 THJ Kern James G. Bowles Juvenile Hall 7146 JH Butte Paradise Police Department 380 THJ Kern Furlough Trtmnt Rehab Prog 7147 Camp Butte Butte Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Program Grantees FY 2019-2020
    TOBACCO GRANT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 ALAMEDA COUNTY APPLICANT SUMMARY OF AWARD AWARD Alameda County Sheriff's Office The Alameda County Sheriff's Office $176,956.00 intends to continue providing training and education, while increasing enforcement efforts in and around tobacco retailer establishments. Livermore Police Department The City of Livermore Police Department $510,888.00 intends to hire a School Resource Officer to conduct training and enforcement, establish a community anti-smoking task force and enforce the new tobacco retail licensing ordinance. City of Fremont Human Services The City of Fremont intends to implement $100,843.05 Department and enforce a Tobacco Retail License Program, prevent and deter the use of tobacco by youth, and conduct decoy operations through a partnership with the Fremont Police Department. COLUSA COUNTY APPLICANT SUMMARY OF AWARD AWARD Colusa County Office of The Colusa County Office of Education $427,589.93 Education intends to provide monitoring, enforcement, education and outreach that will lead to the reduction of tobacco use within its jurisdiction. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPLICANT SUMMARY OF AWARD AWARD San Pablo Police Department The San Pablo Police Department intends $1,358,074.20 to hire an officer and additional staff to ensure tobacco retailer compliance with tobacco laws, curb selling tobacco to minors, and continue conducting outreach and education to youth in schools to prevent and deter tobacco use. EL DORADO COUNTY APPLICANT SUMMARY OF AWARD AWARD South Lake Tahoe Police The South Lake Tahoe Police Department $369,950.00 Department intends to hire a School Resource Officer to be assigned to the South Tahoe Middle School to concentrate on the reduction of underage use of tobacco products by providing outreach and conducting enforcement operations in the surrounding areas.
    [Show full text]
  • California FY2020 Annual Report
    CALIFORNIA ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Annual Report / California Office of Traffic Safety 1 2020 ANNUAL REPORT Gavin Newsom Governor State of California David S. Kim Secretary California State Transportation Agency Barbara L. Rooney Director Office of Traffic Safety 2 2020 Annual Report / California Office of Traffic Safety Gavin Newsom 915 Capitol Mall, Suite 350B Governor Sacramento, CA 95814 916-323-5400 David S. Kim www.calsta.ca.gov Secretary Dear Fellow Californians: I am pleased to present the 2020 Annual Report, which provides an overview of traffic safety programs, activities and initiatives advanced by the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) in the 2020 federal fiscal year. The Annual Report presents the accomplishments and challenges experienced in the prior fiscal year with direct reference to the performance measures, targets, strategies and funding identified in the prior year’s Highway Safety Plan. The Annual Report completes the Highway Safety Plan cycle by providing the results and outcomes achieved through the plan’s implementation. In a year that brought the unprecedented challenges and change of the COVID-19 pandemic, one thing that remains the same is the need for everyone to be safe on the road. I am proud to say the OTS continues to be adaptable and collaborative in addressing the most critical traffic safety issues facing the state. Working with its federal, state and local partners, OTS continues to focus on eliminating traffic fatalities and serious injuries on our roads. In the 2020 federal fiscal year, the OTS awarded $95 million in federal funding to support 303 traffic safety grants. More than 30 of these grants were dedicated to bicycle and pedestrian safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit of Untested Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Kits: 2020 Report
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL XAVIER BECERRA Statewide Audit of Untested Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Kits 2020 Report to the Legislature DIVISION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT BUREAU OF FORENSIC SERVICES Executive Summary DNA evidence from sexual assault evidence (SAE) kits is often a key factor in attaining justice for survivors/victims of sexual assault. When tested, DNA evidence contained in SAE kits can be a powerful tool to solve and prevent crime by identifying unknown offenders and linking multiple crimes to repeat offenders. Unfortunately, there are still challenges in the way this evidence is collected, stored and tracked. A primary example is that California has no comprehensive data on the total number of SAE kits that remain untested. Untested SAE kits are stored at various law enforcement agencies (LEAs), laboratories and medical facilities throughout the state. Some of these kits are the subject of ongoing investigations, some are waiting to be tested or the cases investigated as resources become available, and some kits may never be tested at all. While the existence of a backlog of untested SAE kits in California is generally unquestioned, the exact scope of the backlog is unknown. A lack of data regarding the number and distribution of the state’s untested SAE kits, and uncertainty about the reasons kits remain untested, have posed challenges for policymakers who must decide how best to address the backlog. The purpose of this report is to summarize the data generated by a one-time audit of the untested SAE kits in the possession of California’s LEAs, crime laboratories, medical facilities and others, as mandated by Assembly Bill (AB) 3118, (Stats.
    [Show full text]
  • California Highway Patrol, CA
    Agencies Using BMW Police Motors Alabama Cypress Police Department Montebello Police Department Vestavia Hills Police Department Davis Police Department Murrieta Police Department Sherman Escorts Delano Police Department Napa Police Department Alaska Department of Treasury Newport Beach Police Department Anchorage Police Department Dinuba Police Department Norco Police Department Arkansas El Cajon Police Department Oceanside Police Department North Little Rock Police Department El Centro Police Department Ojai Police Department Arizona El Monte Police Department Ontario Police Department Arizona DPS Elk Grove Police Department Orange Police Department Bullhead City Police Department Escondido Police Department Oxnard Police Department Gilbert Police Department Fillmore Police Department Palm Desert Police Department Goodyear Police Department Folsom Police Department Palos Verdes Police Department Marana Police Department Fontana Police Department Parlier Police Department Pascua Yaqui Tribe Police Department Fountain Valley Police Department Pasadena Police Department Pima Community College PD Forrest Grove Police Department Paso Robles Police Department Oro Valley Police Department Foster City Police Department Pismo Beach Police Department Sedona Police Department Fresno Police Department Pomona Police Department California Fullerton Police Department Rancho Cordova Police Department Anaheim Police Department Gilroy Police Department Riverside County Sheriff / Norco Anderson Police Department Glendora Police Department Riverside Police
    [Show full text]
  • SOSC LETR Agency List Alhambra Police Department Allan Hancock College Law Enforcement Agency Allan Hancock College Police Dept
    SOSC LETR Agency List Alhambra Police Department Allan Hancock College Law Enforcement Agency Allan Hancock College Police Dept. Anaheim Police Department Apple Valley Police Department Arcadia Police Department Arroyo Grande Police Department Arvin Police Department Atascadero Police Department Azusa Police Department Bakersfield Police Department Baldwin Park Police Department Barstow Police Department Beaumont City Police Department Beaumont Police Department Bell Gardens Police Department Bell Police Department Beverly Hills Police Department Border Patrol San Diego Sector Brawley Police Department Brea Police Department Buena Park Police Dept. Burbank Police Department Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement Cal Poly Army ROTC Cal State University Channel Islands Police Department Calexico Police Department California City Correctional Facility California Department of Corrections ‐ State Parole Division California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation California Department of Insurance (Fraud Division) California Department of Justice California Highway Patrol California Highway Patrol (Arrowhead) California Highway Patrol (Baldwin Park) California Highway Patrol (Border Division) California Highway Patrol (Coastal Division) California Highway Patrol (Inland Division) California Highway Patrol (Lancaster) California Highway Patrol (Los Angeles) California Highway Patrol (Morongo Basin) California Highway Patrol (Newhall) California Highway Patrol (Rancho Cucamonga) California Highway
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA SEX OFFENDER INFORMATION (“900” Line)..……
    Report to the California Legislature July 2002 Bill Lockyer California Attorney General A Message from Attorney General Bill Lockyer During the last decade, California has enacted a number of laws to help protect the most vulnerable members of our society, including those laws known collectively as “Megan’s Law.” Megan’s Law allows Californians to access information on the identities and whereabouts of the most serious of the registered sex offenders in the state. Megan’s Law information is made available to the public in three ways: Police and Sheriff’s Departments may notify residents of a nearby “high risk” or “serious” sex offender; residents may call 1-900-448-3000; or residents can view the information at most local law enforcement agencies. During the last seven years, nearly half a million people have taken advantage of this information to better protect themselves, their family members, and their loved ones, and reduce their chances of becoming victims of devastating assaults. Currently, about half of our state’s law enforcement agencies notify residents, schools, or businesses of nearby high risk or serious sex offenders or make the information available to the public. I strongly urge all law enforcement agencies to fully utilize Megan’s Law to improve public safety in their communities. We have made a number of improvements to our Megan’s Law. The information accessed at law enforcement agencies is now updated daily instead of monthly, making it easier to identify a sex offender who has recently moved into a community. Also, the information is now available in 12 additional languages -- Arabic, Armenian, Cambodian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Punjabi, Russian, Spanish, Tagalog, and Vietnamese -- to assist those who do not speak English.
    [Show full text]
  • Homicides in California, 1970-1971 California Department of Justice
    Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Agencies California Documents 1972 Homicides in California, 1970-1971 California Department of Justice Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation California Department of Justice, "Homicides in California, 1970-1971" (1972). California Agencies. Paper 113. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies/113 This Cal State Document is brought to you for free and open access by the California Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Agencies by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I ' 1970 -1971 NON-CIRCULATING l ! FORNIAeDEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE e DIVISION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT e BUREAU OF CRIMINAL STATISTICS 1 KFC22 - .J250 H61 1972 KFC22.J250 H61 1972 California. Bureau of Criminal Statistics Homicides in California, ( 1970-1971 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EVELLE J. YOUNGER, Attorney General CHARLES A. BARRETT, Chief Deputy Attorney General "' II DIVISION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ROBERT A. HOUGHTON, Director ORVILLE J. HAWKINS, Assistant Director BUREAU OF CRIMINAL STATISTICS RONALD H. BEATTIE, Chief • HOMICIDE DATA HUGHS. PENN, Senior Crime Studies Analyst 3301 C STREET P.O.BOX 13427 SACRAMENTO, CA. 95813 DO NOT REMOVE FROM AWLIBRARY GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY FO(~ { (. - ""-~ "f"'l\{C •. ·.- !'I!!• l DO NOT t ... v v ~ - < ., . ··- ~ 'I J • ,\ ; / t \ I' '.J j l.,~ J ~ \. 'J l HOMICIDES IN CALIFORNIA Introduction The homicides included in Part I of this study are divided into two groups- police officers killed and those killed by police officers.
    [Show full text]