DOCSLIB.ORG

RAMSEY-THESIS-2020.Pdf (3.352Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RAMSEY-THESIS-2020.Pdf (3.352Mb) Subsidence Analysis of the Midland Basin and Eastern Shelf of West Texas: Implications for Ancestral Rocky Mountain Timing and Deformation by Cameron Elizabeth Ramsey, B.S. A Thesis In Geology Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCES Approved Dr. Dustin Sweet Chair of Committee Dr. George Asquith Dr. Neo McAdams Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School May, 2020 Copyright 2020, Cameron Elizabeth Ramsey Texas Tech University, Cameron Elizabeth Ramsey, May 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Dustin Sweet for all his guidance and support throughout my time at Texas Tech University. Without your help and patience this project would not have been possible. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. George Asquith and Dr. Neo McAdams. Dr. George Asquith is a wealth of knowledge and I’m very grateful for all your help with the well log analysis. To Dr. Neo McAdams, thank you for all your assistance and insightful questions regarding the biostratigraphic data and graphic method analysis. Additionally, I would like to thank the American Association of Petroleum Geologist Southwest Section for their financial support. I am immensely grateful to the organization for the grant I received for this project. Without this financial aid it would have be difficult to acquire the necessary well logs for the subsidence analysis. Last but not least, I would like to thank my friends and family, without your love and support I would not have gotten this far in my academic career. ii Texas Tech University, Cameron Elizabeth Ramsey, May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................... ii ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................. viii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................. ix CHAPTER I ........................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 Motivation ......................................................................................................... 1 Hypothesis Statement ........................................................................................ 3 Significance ....................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER II ......................................................................................................... 4 GEOLOGIC BACKGROUND ............................................................................ 4 Geologic Setting ................................................................................................ 4 Chronostratigraphy ............................................................................................ 7 Atokan Stage ............................................................................................... 8 Strawn Stage ............................................................................................... 9 Canyon Stage .............................................................................................. 9 Cisco Stage ................................................................................................ 10 Wolfcamp Stage ........................................................................................ 11 Leonardian Stage ....................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER III ..................................................................................................... 13 METHODS .......................................................................................................... 13 Biostratigraphic Data ...................................................................................... 13 Basin Subsidence ............................................................................................ 15 Site Generation .......................................................................................... 15 Decompaction ................................................................................................. 17 Site C ......................................................................................................... 19 Site D ......................................................................................................... 20 Site E ......................................................................................................... 20 Site F ......................................................................................................... 20 iii Texas Tech University, Cameron Elizabeth Ramsey, May 2020 Graphic Method for Correlation...................................................................... 22 CHAPTER IV ...................................................................................................... 25 RESULTS ............................................................................................................ 25 Subsidence Analysis ....................................................................................... 25 Eastern Shelf Subsidence Analysis ................................................................. 25 Site A ......................................................................................................... 25 Site B ......................................................................................................... 27 Site C ......................................................................................................... 27 Midland Basin Subsidence Analysis ............................................................... 27 Site D ......................................................................................................... 28 Site E ......................................................................................................... 28 Site F ......................................................................................................... 29 Graphic Method for Correlation...................................................................... 30 Shelf-to-Shelf Comparisons ...................................................................... 30 Basin-to-Basin Comparisons ..................................................................... 32 Shelf-to-Basin Comparisons ..................................................................... 34 CHAPTER V ....................................................................................................... 36 DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................... 36 Tectonic Subsidence Analysis ........................................................................ 36 Eastern Shelf ............................................................................................. 36 Midland Basin ........................................................................................... 36 Rates of Tectonic Subsidence ................................................................... 38 Sediment Accumulation .................................................................................. 38 Graphic Method for Correlation...................................................................... 40 Shelf-to-Shelf Comparisons ...................................................................... 40 Basin-to-Basin Comparisons ..................................................................... 40 Shelf-to-Basin Comparisons ..................................................................... 41 Evolution of the Midland Basin and Eastern Shelf ......................................... 43 Atokan ....................................................................................................... 43 Strawn ....................................................................................................... 43 Canyon ...................................................................................................... 43 Cisco .......................................................................................................... 44 Wolfcamp .................................................................................................. 44 Leonardian ................................................................................................ 45 iv Texas Tech University, Cameron Elizabeth Ramsey, May 2020 Implications for Ancestral Rocky Mountains ................................................. 45 CHAPTER VI ...................................................................................................... 49 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 49 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................... 50 APPENDIX A ...................................................................................................... 56 PABZT Data Distribution ............................................................................... 56 Backstripping Data .......................................................................................... 57 Individual Tectonic Subsidence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tetrapod Biostratigraphy and Biochronology of the Triassic–Jurassic Transition on the Southern Colorado Plateau, USA
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 244 (2007) 242–256 www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology of the Triassic–Jurassic transition on the southern Colorado Plateau, USA Spencer G. Lucas a,⁎, Lawrence H. Tanner b a New Mexico Museum of Natural History, 1801 Mountain Rd. N.W., Albuquerque, NM 87104-1375, USA b Department of Biology, Le Moyne College, 1419 Salt Springs Road, Syracuse, NY 13214, USA Received 15 March 2006; accepted 20 June 2006 Abstract Nonmarine fluvial, eolian and lacustrine strata of the Chinle and Glen Canyon groups on the southern Colorado Plateau preserve tetrapod body fossils and footprints that are one of the world's most extensive tetrapod fossil records across the Triassic– Jurassic boundary. We organize these tetrapod fossils into five, time-successive biostratigraphic assemblages (in ascending order, Owl Rock, Rock Point, Dinosaur Canyon, Whitmore Point and Kayenta) that we assign to the (ascending order) Revueltian, Apachean, Wassonian and Dawan land-vertebrate faunachrons (LVF). In doing so, we redefine the Wassonian and the Dawan LVFs. The Apachean–Wassonian boundary approximates the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. This tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology of the Triassic–Jurassic transition on the southern Colorado Plateau confirms that crurotarsan extinction closely corresponds to the end of the Triassic, and that a dramatic increase in dinosaur diversity, abundance and body size preceded the end of the Triassic. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Triassic–Jurassic boundary; Colorado Plateau; Chinle Group; Glen Canyon Group; Tetrapod 1. Introduction 190 Ma. On the southern Colorado Plateau, the Triassic– Jurassic transition was a time of significant changes in the The Four Corners (common boundary of Utah, composition of the terrestrial vertebrate (tetrapod) fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • New Radiometric 40Ar–39Ar Dates and Faunistic Analyses Refine
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN New radiometric 40Ar–39Ar dates and faunistic analyses refne evolutionary dynamics of Neogene vertebrate assemblages in southern South America Francisco J. Prevosti1,2*, Cristo O. Romano2,3, Analía M. Forasiepi2,3, Sidney Hemming4, Ricardo Bonini2,5, Adriana M. Candela2,6, Esperanza Cerdeño2,3, M. Carolina Madozzo Jaén2,7,8, Pablo E. Ortiz2,7, François Pujos2,3, Luciano Rasia2,6, Gabriela I. Schmidt2,9, Matias Taglioretti10,11,12, Ross D. E. MacPhee13 & Ulyses F. J. Pardiñas2,14,15 The vertebrate fossil record of the Pampean Region of Argentina occupies an important place in South American vertebrate paleontology. An abundance of localities has long been the main basis for constructing the chronostratigraphical/geochronological scale for the late Neogene–Quaternary of South America, as well as for understanding major patterns of vertebrate evolution, including the Great American Biotic Interchange. However, few independently-derived dates are available for constraining this record. In this contribution, we present new 40Ar/39Ar dates on escorias (likely the product of meteoric impacts) from the Argentinean Atlantic coast and statistically-based biochronological analyses that help to calibrate Late Miocene–Pliocene Pampean faunal successions. For the type areas of the Montehermosan and Chapadmalalan Ages/Stages, our results delimit their age ranges to 4.7–3.7 Ma and ca. 3.74–3.04 Ma, respectively. Additionally, from Buenos Aires Province, dates of 5.17 Ma and 4.33 Ma were recovered for “Huayquerian” and Montehermosan faunas. This information helps to better calibrate important frst appearances of allochthonous taxa in South America, including one of the oldest records for procyonids (7.24–5.95 Ma), cricetids (6.95– 5.46 Ma), and tayassuids (> 3.74 Ma, oldest high-confdence record).
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH New Biostratigraphic Evidence of Late Permian to Late
    RESEARCH New biostratigraphic evidence of Late Permian to Late Triassic deposits from Central Tibet and their paleogeographic implications Gui-chun Wu1,*, Zhan-sheng Ji2, Wei-hua Liao3, and Jian-xin Yao1 1KEY LABORATORY OF STRATIGRAPHY AND PALAEONTOLOGY, MINISTRY OF LAND AND RESOURCES, INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY, CHINESE ACADEMY OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, BEIJING 100037, CHINA 2CHINESE ACADEMY OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, BEIJING 100037, CHINA 3NANJING INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND PALAEONTOLOGY, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, NANJING, 210008, CHINA ABSTRACT Triassic deposits in the Bangong-Nujiang Suture Zone are important for understanding its tectonic nature and evolutionary history, but have not been systematically studied due to a lack of biostratigraphic data. For a long time, the Upper Triassic Quehala Group featuring clasolite has been regarded as the only rocky unit. In recent years, the silicite-dominated Gajia Formation that bears radiolarian fossils was suggested to represent Ladinian to Carnian deposits. The Upper Permian and Lower Triassic rocks have never been excavated and thus are considered to be absent. This research, however, reveals that fossils aged from the Late Permian to Anisian of the Middle Trias- sic and Norian of the Late Triassic have been preserved in the central Bangong-Nujiang Suture Zone, which provides evidence of Upper Permian to early Middle Triassic deposits and provides new insights on the Upper Triassic strata as well. A new Triassic strata succes- sion is thus proposed for the Bangong-Nujiang Suture Zone, and it demonstrates great similarities with those from Lhasa to the south and Qiangtang to the north. Therefore, we deduce that the Bangong-Nujiang Suture Zone was under a similar depositional setting as its two adjacent terranes, and it was likely a carbonate platform background because limestones were predominant across the Triassic.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetostratigraphy of Permian/Triassic Boundary Sequences in the Cis-Urals, Russia: No Evidence for a Major Temporal Hiatus
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 281 (2009) 36–47 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Magnetostratigraphy of Permian/Triassic boundary sequences in the Cis-Urals, Russia: No evidence for a major temporal hiatus Graeme K. Taylor a,⁎, Christopher Tucker a, Richard J. Twitchett a, Timothy Kearsey a, Michael J. Benton b, Andrew J. Newell c, Mikhail V. Surkov d, Valentin P. Tverdokhlebov d a School of Earth, Ocean and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK b Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK c British Geological Survey, MacLean Building, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK d Geology Institute of Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya 83, 410075 Saratov, Russia article info abstract Article history: During the last five years there has been considerable doubt over the age of the continental uppermost Received 6 June 2008 Permian Russian stages, the Kazanian and Tatarian. Traditionally they have been regarded as Late Permian Received in revised form 3 February 2009 but were re-dated as Middle Permian in the 2004 international time scale, despite fossil evidence that the Accepted 6 February 2009 Tatarian, at least, is Late Permian. These debated ages are tested by magnetostratigraphic study of five Available online 5 March 2009 sections spanning the Permian Triassic Boundary (PTB) of the SE Urals in the Orenburg region of Russia. The Editor: R.D. van der Hilst Upper Permian and Lower Triassic of this region have a well documented vertebrate fauna whose evolution has a significant bearing on our understanding of the PTB mass extinction event.
    [Show full text]
  • Dating the Mirador Formation in the Llanos Basin of Colombia 29
    BIOSTRATIGRAPHY BREAKING PARADIGMS: DATING THE MIRADOR FORMATION IN THE LLANOS BASIN OF COLOMBIA 29 BIOSTRATIGRAPHY BREAKING PARADIGMS: DATING THE MIRADOR FORMATION IN THE LLANOS BASIN OF COLOMBIA C.A. JARAMILLO Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0946, APO AA 34002, U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected] M. RUEDA ICP, Bucaramanga, Km 7 via Piedecuesta, Colombia G. BAYONA Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0946, APO AA 34002, U.S.A. and Corporación Geológica ARES, Calle 57 24-11 of, 202, Bogotá, Colombia C. SANTOS, P. FLOREZ, AND F. PARRA ICP, Bucaramanga, Km 7 via Piedecuesta, Colombia ABSTRACT: The two major oil fields in Colombia discovered in the last fifty years are the Caño Limón and Cusiana fields. Caño Limón is located in the eastern region of the unfolded Llanos of Colombia, and Cusiana is located in the leading thrust sheet of the Llanos Foothills. Paleogene strata in both areas were part of a large foreland basin active since the latest Cretaceous. In both cases the main reservoir is a quartz arenite unit, informally called the Mirador formation, that has always been assumed to extend as a continuous Eocene sandstone layer from the Llanos Foothills into the Llanos Basin. However, recent palynological data suggested that this unit is diachronous across the Llanos and Llanos Foothills. Here, we dated 44 sections in the Llanos Basin and Llanos Foothills using a new zonation that is proposed for the region. Biostratigraphic results constrain the age of the Mirador Formation in the Llanos Foothills as early to middle Eocene with no evidence of a biostratigraphic gap with underlying early Eocene strata.
    [Show full text]
  • Micro- and Small Vertebrate Biostratigraphy and Biochronology of the Upper Triassic Chinle Group, Southwestern Usa
    Harris et al., eds., 2006, The Triassic-Jurassic Terrestrial Transition. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 37. 94 MICRO- AND SMALL VERTEBRATE BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND BIOCHRONOLOGY OF THE UPPER TRIASSIC CHINLE GROUP, SOUTHWESTERN USA ANDREW B. HECKERT1 AND SPENCER G. LUCAS2 1Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, ASU Box 32067, Boone, NC 28608-2067; 2New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Road NW, Albuquerque, NM 87104-1375 Abstract—A long-term goal of vertebrate biostratigraphers is to construct a microvertebrate biostratigraphy for lower Mesozoic rocks that complements and extends the mammal-based biostratigraphy in place for Upper Cretaceous-Recent deposits. Here we report substantial progress toward achieving this goal based on the distribu- tion of microvertebrate fossils in the Upper Triassic Chinle Group of the western USA. This biostratigraphic hypothesis independently corroborates the existing macrovertebrate biostratigraphy, recognizing four temporally successive assemblages—the Otischalkian, Adamanian, Revueltian, and Apachean, with subdivisions of the Adamanian (St. Johnsian and Lamyan) and Revueltian (Barrancan and Lucianoan). Many microvertebrate taxa, unfortunately, have long stratigraphic ranges and thus, while widespread and easily recognized, are not reliable index fossils. These taxa include the chondrichthyans Lissodus and Reticulodus synergus, most lepidosauromorphs (including sphenodontians), and various microvertebrate archosauromorphs. However, other taxa have relatively short stratigraphic ranges and occur in multiple localities and thus have some utility as index taxa. Adamanian index taxa include the procolophonid(?) Colognathus obscurus and the putative ornithischians Tecovasaurus murryi, Crosbysaurus harrisae and Krzyzanowskisaurus hunti. Revueltian index taxa include the chondrichthyan Reticulodus synergus, the crurotarsan Revueltosaurus callenderi and the cynodont Pseudotriconodon chatterjeei.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontological Geoheritage of Newfoundland and Labrador
    Atlantic Geology Volume 49 .. 2013 106 Paleontological geoheritage of Newfoundland and Labrador W. Douglas Boyce Geological Survey, Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 8700, St. John’s, Newfoundland A1B 4J6, Canada Newfoundland and Labrador contains a wealth of paleontology-related geoheritage sites. Eastern Newfoundland has some of the oldest and richest localities of a unique deep-water Ediacaran biota on the planet, typified by the fossils of the Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve, Spaniard’s Bay, and the eastern Bonavista Peninsula. Furthermore, the type locality of the first described Ediacaran fossil Aspidella terranovica Billings, 1872 is in downtown St. John’s. The Global Stratotype-Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Cambrian Period occur within the Fortune Head Ecological Reserve on the Burin Peninsula, where they are defined by the First Appearance Datum (FAD) of the trace fossil Treptichnus pedum. Manuels River is world- famous for its Middle Cambrian “Paradoxides Beds” studied by Dr. B.F. Howell of Princeton University, though his original collections now are lost. It was in the Manuels River area where G.F. Matthew’s and C.D. Walcott’s earlier debate about the relative stratigraphic positions of Callavia and Paradoxides was settled. In addition, Bell Island is world- renowned for its abundant Ordovician trace fossils. With respect to western Newfoundland, in the 1860s a substantial number of fossil genera were described for the first time by E. Billings (the Geological Survey of Canada’s first paleontologist); the fossils were collected by J. Richardson during the field mapping for W.E. Logan’s historic Geology of Canada report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Permian Timescale: an Introduction
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 2, 2021 The Permian timescale: an introduction SPENCER G. LUCAS1* & SHU-ZHONG SHEN2 1New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Road NW, Albuquerque, NM 87104-1375, USA 2State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210008, China *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Permian timescale has developed over about two centuries of research to the current chronostratigraphic scale advocated by the Subcommission on Permian Stratigraphy of three series and nine stages: Cisuralian (lower Permian) – Asselian, Sakmarian, Artinskian, Kun- gurian; Guadalupian (middle Permian) – Roadian, Wordian, Capitanian; and Lopingian (upper Permian) – Wuchiapingian and Changhsingian. The boundaries of the Permian System are defined by global stratotype sections and points (GSSPs) and the numerical ages of those boundaries appear to be determined with a precision better than 1‰. Nevertheless, much work remains to be done to refine the Permian timescale. Precise numerical age control within the Permian is very uneven and a global polarity timescale for the Permian is far from established. Chronostratigraphic definitions of three of the nine Permian stages remain unfinished and various issues of marine biostratigraphy are still unresolved. In the non-marine Permian realm, much progress has been made in correlation, especially using palynomorphs, megafossil plants, conchostracans and both the footprints and bones of tetrapods (amphibians and reptiles), but many problems of correlation remain, especially the cross-correlation of non-marine and marine chronologies. The further development of a Perm- ian chronostratigraphic scale faces various problems, including those of stability and priority of nomenclature and concepts, disagreements over changing taxonomy, ammonoid v.
    [Show full text]
  • The SPICE Carbon Isotope Excursion in Siberia: a Combined Study of The
    Geol. Mag. 145 (5), 2008, pp. 609–622. c 2008 Cambridge University Press 609 doi:10.1017/S0016756808004913 Printed in the United Kingdom The SPICE carbon isotope excursion in Siberia: a combined study of the upper Middle Cambrian–lowermost Ordovician Kulyumbe River section, northwestern Siberian Platform ARTEM KOUCHINSKY*†, STEFAN BENGTSON*, YVES GALLET‡, IGOR KOROVNIKOV§, VLADIMIR PAVLOV¶, BRUCE RUNNEGAR, GRAHAM SHIELDS#, JAN VEIZER**, EDWARD YOUNG & KAREN ZIEGLER *Department of Palaeozoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden ‡Equipe´ de Paleomagn´ etisme,´ UMR CNRS 7154, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, France §Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Academician Koptyug Avenue, 3, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia ¶Institute of Physics of the Earth, Bol’shaya Gruzinskaya 10, Moscow 123995, Russia Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567, USA #Geologisch-Palaontologisches¨ Institut, Westfalische¨ Wilhelms-Universitat,¨ Correnstr. 24, 48149 Munster,¨ Germany **Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada (Received 2 April 2007; accepted 14 January 2008; First published online 23 May 2008) Abstract – An integrated, high-resolution chemostratigraphic (C, O and Sr isotopes) and magnetostratigraphic study through the upper Middle Cambrian–lowermost Ordovician shallow- marine carbonates of the northwestern margin of the Siberian Platform is reported. The interval was analysed at the Kulyumbe section, which is exposed along the Kulyumbe River, an eastern tributary of the Enisej River. It comprises the upper Ust’-Brus, Labaz, Orakta, Kulyumbe, Ujgur and lower Iltyk formations and includes the Steptoean positive carbon isotopic excursion (SPICE) studied here in detail from upper Cambrian carbonates of the Siberian Platform for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • The First 40 Million Years of Planktonic Foraminifera
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 14 December 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0319.v1 The first 40 million years of planktonic foraminifera Felix Gradstein1, Anna Waskowska2 and Larisa Glinskikh3 1. University of Oslo, Norway (email: [email protected]); 2. AGH University of Sciences and Technology, Kraków, Poland; 3. Trofimuk Institute, Novosibirsk, Russia. Abstract We provide a biochronology of Jurassic planktonic foramininfera, using first order linkage to ammonite and nannofossil stratigraphy and geochronology. This enigmatic and understudied group of microfossils occurred from middle Toarcian through Tithonian time, from ~180 to ~143 Ma; its origin is unknown. There are three genera: Globuligerina, Conoglobigerina and Petaloglobigerina. The genus Globuligerina, with a smooth to pustulose test surface texture appeared in Toarcian (late Early Jurassic) and Conoglobigerina, with a rough reticulate test surface texture in Oxfordian (early Late Jurassic) time. The genus Petaloglobigerina, with a petaloid last whorl and one or more twisted and claviform chambers evolved in early Kimmeridgian time from Globuligerina balakhmatovae. We recognize stratigraphic events from eleven species across four evolutionary lineages, calibrated to Geologic Time Scale 2020. A dramatic faunal change over, which is not well documented led to the survival of only one taxon, most likely Gobuligerina oxfordiana in the Tithonian. During the Berriasian several new taxa appeared. Keywords: Planktonic foraminifera, Jurassic, evolution, biochronology. Introduction We provide a tentative biochronology of Jurassic planktonic foramininfera, using their taxonomy, stratigraphy, paleoecology and paleogeography with first order linkage to ammonite and nannofossil stratigraphy and geochronology. The study uses bio-chronostratigraphic information summarized in the section called ‘Stratigraphic Inventory’ on this enigmatic and understudied group of microorganisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Stratigraphic, Geochemical, and Paleontological Late Ediacaran to Early Cambrian Records from Southwestern Mongolia
    Integrated late Ediacaran to early Cambrian records from southwestern Mongolia Integrated stratigraphic, geochemical, and paleontological late Ediacaran to early Cambrian records from southwestern Mongolia Emily F. Smith†, Francis A. Macdonald, Tanya A. Petach, Uyanga Bold, and Daniel P. Schrag Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA ABSTRACT minths, cap-shaped fossils, protoconodonts, limited to a small number of localities with large and Salanacus to just below the positive peak uncertainties in both local and global strati- The Zavkhan terrane in western Mongolia 3p. This interpretation differs from previ- graphic correlations and the lack of absolute preserves thick, fossiliferous, carbonate-rich ous chronostratigraphic placements of first ages directly linked to biostratigraphic and che- strata that span the Ediacaran-Cambrian appearance data of genera between positive mostratigraphic data, particularly with respect transition. Measured stratigraphic sections excursions 1p and 2p. Using this level as the to critical data from Asia. Because the global and geological mapping of these strata, first appearance datum in Mongolia for these data set is biased by just a few localities, refin- which include the Zuun-Arts, Bayangol, genera, we replot global fossil first appear- ing local correlations and grounding them in Salaagol, and Khairkhan Formations, reveal ances. With this new compilation, there are regional geology are necessary before an accu- large lateral facies changes over short dis- still three distinct pulses of fossil first appear- rate global synthesis of fossil occurrence data tances that necessitate revisions to previous ances, as was suggested in previous compila- can be constructed and interpreted. lithostratigraphic correlations and biostrati- tions; however, we suggest that this pattern is The Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary is defined graphic range charts.
    [Show full text]
  • Dodging Snowballs: Geochronology of the Gaskiers Glaciation and the First Appearance of the Ediacaran Biota
    Dodging snowballs: Geochronology of the Gaskiers glaciation and the first appearance of the Ediacaran biota Judy P. Pu1,2, Samuel A. Bowring1, Jahandar Ramezani1, Paul Myrow3, Timothy D. Raub4, Ed Landing5, Andrea Mills6, Eben Hodgin2, and Francis A. Macdonald2 1Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA 2Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA 3Department of Geology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903, USA 4Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St Andrews, Irvine Building, St Andrews KY16 9AL, UK 5New York State Museum, Albany, New York 12230, USA 6Geological Survey of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John’s, Newfoundland A1B 4J6, Canada ABSTRACT glaciations are succeeded by transgressive sequences and post-glacial The snowball Earth hypothesis predicts that low-latitude glacia- cap carbonate units, which provide evidence for a strong CO2 hysteresis tion lasted millions of years while CO2 built up to critical levels to and extreme weathering (Bao et al., 2008; Hoffman et al., 1998). These culminate in catastrophic deglaciation in a supergreenhouse climate. features are consistent with the fundamental predictions of the snowball The Gaskiers Formation of eastern Newfoundland (Canada) has been Earth hypothesis. attributed to a snowball glaciation event, but the lack of robust paleo- A third group of younger Neoproterozoic glacial deposits exists on at magnetic data and precise geochronological constraints has precluded least eight different paleocontinents (Hoffman and Li, 2009; McGee et tests of the hypothesis. Here we present high-precision U-Pb zircon al., 2013), and in four Australian sections these deposits are associated geochronology (chemical abrasion–isotope dilution–thermal ioniza- with moderately robust low-latitude paleomagnetic results (e.g., Gostin et tion mass spectrometry) from eight tuffs from multiple distant strati- al., 2010).
    [Show full text]