DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to Neural Engineering: Neuroprosthetics & Brain-Computer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to Neural Engineering: Neuroprosthetics & Brain-Computer Introduction to Neural Engineering: Neuroprosthetics & Brain-Computer Interfaces A Curriculum Unit for Grades 6-12 STEM Classes Research Experience for Teachers (RET) Program Draft for Piloting, September 2014 Copyright © 2014, Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering, University of Washington About the Research Experience for Teachers (RET) Program The Research Experience for Teachers (RET) program is a seven week research experience for middle and high school STEM teachers, hosted by the Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering (CSNE) on the University of Washington’s Seattle campus. Each summer cohort is selected through a competitive application process. Accepted teachers work in a CSNE lab alongside a team of researchers conducting cutting-edge neural engineering research. They enhance their understanding of lab safety, bioethics, engineering education, and curriculum design. Together, the teachers work to develop innovative neural engineering curriculum materials, which are then pilot-tested in their own classrooms the following academic year. About the Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering (CSNE) The Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering (CSNE) develops innovative modes of human-computer interaction by connecting brains with technology. We study signals from the brain, use that information to cause an action—such as moving a prosthetic hand or computer cursor—and provide useful information back to the brain. Our research is aimed at significantly improving the quality of life for people with spinal cord injury, stroke, Parkinson's disease, and other disabilities. By designing closed-loop neural-interactive systems we hope to help restore mobility as well as sensory and motor functions. Neural Engineering Skill Sets The CSNE has identified the following skill sets as essential for students to achieve neural engineering competency. All education activities supported by the CSNE are designed to teach one or more of these skills. 1. Fundamentals of neuroscience, engineering, and neuroethics research: Knowledge of core concepts in neuroscience and neural engineering, designing and conducting experiments, analysis and interpretation of results, problem solving, understanding primary scientific literature, building scientific knowledge, and ethical and responsible conduct of research. 2. Neural engineering best practices: Oral and written communication of neural engineering knowledge and research, confidence, working independently, working on a team, participating in a learning community, innovation, and persistence. 3. Connections to neural engineering industry and careers: Awareness of career options in neural engineering and pathways Funding The Research Experience for Teachers program is supported by National Science Foundation Award EEC-1028725. Program Contact Information: Kristen Bergsman, M.Ed. Eric H. Chudler, Ph.D. CSNE Pre-College Education Program CSNE Executive Director & Education Co- Manager Director University of Washington University of Washington Phone: 206-221-1494 Phone: 206-616-6899 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Karen May Newman CSNE Education Co-Director San Diego State University Phone: 619-594-5652 Email: [email protected] CSNE Address: 1414 NE 42nd Street, Suite 204, Seattle, WA 98105 CSNE Website: http://www.csne-erc.org Credits: Kristen Bergsman, Pre-college Education Manager, Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering Claudia Lemus, Science Teacher, TAF Academy, Federal Way, WA Renee Poitras, Science Teacher, Kent-Meridian High School, Kent, WA Steve Pratt, Science Teacher, Cleveland High School, Seattle, WA Angelica Sauceda, Science Teacher, TAF Academy, Federal Way, WA Acknowledgements: We acknowledge the support of the following individuals: Rajesh Rao, PhD; Eric Chudler, PhD; Lise Johnson, PhD; Kristi Morgansen, PhD; William Shain, PhD; Deb Harper; Josh Patrick; Mary Guiden; and Meghan Helms. Our gratitude is extended to the following people and organizations that granted the use of their educational materials: Backyard Brains, Institute for Systems Biology, Neuroscience for Kids, and Dr. Paul Gabbott. Disclaimer: All Research Experience for Teachers materials are provided “as-is” and without any warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied. Neither the Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering, the University of Washington, or the National Science Foundation assume any legal liability or responsibility for the completeness, accuracy, or usefulness of any information in this curriculum unit, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Copyright: Copyright © 2014, Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering, University of Washington. Permission is granted to reproduce and use these materials for non-profit, educational use only. Table of Contents About the RET Program & the CSNE Contact Information & Credits Alignment to National Learning Standards Lesson One: Entry Event—Launching the Neuroprosthetics Project Student Handout 1.1: Neuroprosthetics Project Entry Document Student Handout 1.2: Neuroprosthetics T-Chart Student Handout 1.3: Exit Ticket—Introduction to Neural Engineering PowerPoint: Introduction to Neural Engineering Lesson Two: Introduction to Systems Student Handout 2.4: Systems Vocab Sheet Teacher Resource 2.4: Systems Student Vocab Guidance PowerPoint: Cell Phone Network Lesson Three: Reaction Time Lab Student Handout 3.1: What Can Impact Your Reaction Time? (Part I) Student Handout 3.2: What Can Impact Your Reaction Time? (Part II) Teacher Resource 3.1: What Can Impact Your Reaction Time? (Teacher Key) Lesson Four: SpikerBox Lab Part I—Spikes for All Student Handout 4.1: SpikerBox Lab Part I—Spikes for All Student Handout 4.2: KWL Chart Teacher Resource 4.1: SpikerBox Lab Part I Teacher Key Lesson Five: Action Potential Student Handout 5.1: Action Potential Interactive Animation Student Handout 5.2: Action Potential Race Analysis Chart Teacher Resource 5.1: Action Potential Interactive Animation Teacher Key Lesson Six: SpikerBox Lab Part II—Analyzing Spikes Student Handout 6.1: SpikerBox Lab Part II—Analyzing Spikes Student Handout 6.2: Analyzing Spikes Exit Ticket Teacher Resource 6.1: Spiker Box Lab Part II Teacher Key Lesson Seven: Neural Engineering & Brain-Computer Interfaces Student Handout 7.1: Brain-Computer Interface Fact Sheets Student Handout 7.2: Neural Engineering Examples Teacher Resource 7.1: Neural Engineering Examples Teacher Key PowerPoint: Brain-Computer Interfaces Lesson Eight: Introduction to Neuroethics Student Handout 8.1: Socratic Seminar Structure & Rubric Teacher Resource 8.1: Short Scenarios on Ethical Issues PowerPoint: Ethical Issues Surrounding Neuroprosthetics and BCIs PowerPoint: Safe Discussions in the Classroom Lesson Nine: Getting to Know the Arduino Uno Student Handout 9.1: Day One Exit Ticket Student Handout 9.2: Day Two Exit Ticket Teacher Resource 9.1: Arduino Sketches PowerPoint: Circuits and Arduino Uno Lesson Ten: Pugh Charts & Peer Review Student Handout 10.1: Pugh Chart Practice PowerPoint: Analyzing Solutions Lesson Eleven (Optional): Online Research & Writing an Abstract Appendix Neural Engineering Project Rubric Alignment to National Learning Standards Next Generation Science Standards: Middle School (Grades 6-8) Systems Event : Pugh: Charts Searches Abstracts : & Intro to to Intro SpikerBox Lab Part I : Reaction Reaction : Time Lab : : Action Potential Action : : SpikerBox Lab Part II Neural: Engineering Intro: to Neuroethics Arduino: Uno 2: 1: Entry 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Final Project Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science MS-ETS1-1 Engineering Design: Define the criteria and constraints of a design problem with sufficient precision to ensure a successful solution, taking into account relevant scientific principles and potential impacts on people and the natural environment that may limit possible solutions. MS-ETS1-2 Engineering Design: Evaluate competing design solutions using a systemic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem. Life Sciences MS-LS1-3 Structure, Function, and Information Processing: Use argument supported by evidence for how the body is a system of interacting subsystems composed of groups of cells. MS-LS1-8 Structure, Function, and Information Processing: Gather and synthesize information that sensory receptors respond to stimuli by sending messages to the brain for immediate behavior or storage as memories. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS. Common Core State Standards: Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, & Technical Subjects: Middle School (Grades 6-8) Systems Event : Pugh: Charts Searches Abstracts : & Intro to to Intro : Reaction Reaction : Time Lab : SpikerBox Lab Part I Potential Action : : SpikerBox Lab Part II Neural: Engineering Intro: to Neuroethics Arduino: Uno 2: 1: Entry 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Final Project WHST.6-8.7 Writing: Conduct short research projects to answer a question (including a self- generated question), drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions that allow for multiple avenues of exploration. WHST.6-8.8 Writing: Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard form
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Computational Neuroscience Meets Optogenetics: Unlocking the Brain’S Secrets
    Health & Medicine ︱ Prof Simon Schultz and Dr Konstantin Nikolic Computational neuroscience meets optogenetics: Unlocking the brain’s secrets Working at the interface omposed of billions of specialised responsible for perception, action Simplified models allow researchers to study how the geometry of a neuron’s “dendritic tree” affects its ability to process information. between engineering and nerve cells (called neurons) wired and memory. But this is changing. neuroscience, Professor Simon C together in complex, intricate Schultz and Dr Konstantin webs, the brain is inherently challenging LET THERE BE LIGHT Nikolic at Imperial College to study. Neurons communicate with A powerful new tool (invented by Boyden of Neurotechnology and Director of SHEDDING LIGHT ON THE BRAIN AN INSIGHT INTO NEURONAL GAIN London are developing tools each other by transmitting electrical and and Deisseroth just a little over a decade the Imperial Centre of Excellence in Their innovative approach uses Using two biophysical models of to help us understand the chemical signals along neural circuits: ago) allows researchers to map the brain’s Neurotechnology, Dr Konstantin Nikolic, sophisticated two-photon microscopy, neurons, genetically-modified to include intricate workings of the brain. signals that vary both in space and time. connections, giving unprecedented Associate Professor in the Department optogenetics and electrophysiology two distinct light-sensitive proteins Combining a revolutionary Until now, technical limitations in the access to the workings of the brain. Its of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, to measure (and disturb) patterns of (called opsins): channelrhodopsin-2 technology – optogenetics available research methods to study the impressive resolution enables precise and Dr Sarah Jarvis are taking a unique neuronal activity in vivo (in living tissue).
    [Show full text]
  • Implantable Microelectrodes on Soft Substrate with Nanostructured Active Surface for Stimulation and Recording of Brain Activities Valentina Castagnola
    Implantable microelectrodes on soft substrate with nanostructured active surface for stimulation and recording of brain activities Valentina Castagnola To cite this version: Valentina Castagnola. Implantable microelectrodes on soft substrate with nanostructured active sur- face for stimulation and recording of brain activities. Micro and nanotechnologies/Microelectronics. Universite Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 2014. English. tel-01137352 HAL Id: tel-01137352 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01137352 Submitted on 31 Mar 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSETHÈSE En vue de l’obtention du DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE Délivré par : l’Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier (UT3 Paul Sabatier) Présentée et soutenue le 18/12/2014 par : Valentina CASTAGNOLA Implantable Microelectrodes on Soft Substrate with Nanostructured Active Surface for Stimulation and Recording of Brain Activities JURY M. Frédéric MORANCHO Professeur d’Université Président de jury M. Blaise YVERT Directeur de recherche Rapporteur Mme Yael HANEIN Professeur d’Université Rapporteur M. Pascal MAILLEY Directeur de recherche Examinateur M. Christian BERGAUD Directeur de recherche Directeur de thèse Mme Emeline DESCAMPS Chargée de Recherche Directeur de thèse École doctorale et spécialité : GEET : Micro et Nanosystèmes Unité de Recherche : Laboratoire d’Analyse et d’Architecture des Systèmes (UPR 8001) Directeur(s) de Thèse : M.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroplasticity in Adult Human Visual Cortex
    Neuroplasticity in adult human visual cortex Elisa Castaldi1, Claudia Lunghi2 and Maria Concetta Morrone3,4 1 Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy 2 Laboratoire des systèmes perceptifs, Département d’études cognitives, École normale supérieure, PSL University, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France 3 Department of Translational Research and New technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy 4 IRCCS Stella Maris, Calambrone (Pisa), Italy Abstract Between 1-5:100 people worldwide has never experienced normotypic vision due to a condition called amblyopia, and about 1:4000 suffer from inherited retinal dystrophies that progressively lead them to blindness. While a wide range of technologies and therapies are being developed to restore vision, a fundamental question still remains unanswered: would the adult visual brain retain a sufficient plastic potential to learn how to ‘see’ after a prolonged period of abnormal visual experience? In this review we summarize studies showing that the visual brain of sighted adults retains a type of developmental plasticity, called homeostatic plasticity, and this property has been recently exploited successfully for adult amblyopia recover. Next, we discuss how the brain circuits reorganizes when visual stimulation is partially restored by means of a ‘bionic eye’ in late blinds with Retinitis Pigmentosa. The primary visual cortex in these patients slowly became activated by the artificial visual stimulation, indicating that
    [Show full text]
  • ECE 5070: Neuroengineering and Neuroprosthetics
    ECE 5070: Neuroengineering and Neuroprosthetics Course Description An overview of the broad field of Neuroengineering for graduate and senior undergraduate students with engineering or neuroscience backgrounds. Focusing on neural interfaces and prostheses, this course covers from basic neurophysiology and computational neuronal models to advanced neural interfaces and prostheses currently being actively developed in the field. Transcript Abbreviation: Neur Eng & Prosth Grading Plan: Letter Grade Course Deliveries: Classroom Course Levels: Undergrad, Graduate Student Ranks: Junior, Senior, Masters, Doctoral Course Offerings: Autumn Flex Scheduled Course: Never Course Frequency: Even Years Course Length: 14 Week Credits: 3.0 Repeatable: No Time Distribution: 3.0 hr Lec Expected out-of-class hours per week: 6.0 Graded Component: Lecture Credit by Examination: No Admission Condition: No Off Campus: Never Campus Locations: Columbus Prerequisites and Co-requisites: Prereq: 3050 or BME 3703; or Neurosc 3010; or Grad standing in Engineering or Neurosc. Exclusions: Not open to students with credit for 5194.03 or Neurosc 5070. Cross-Listings: Cross-listed in Neurosc. Course Rationale: Introduce students a vibrant, interdisciplinary field which integrates engineering and neuroscience principles for treating neurological disorders. The course is required for this unit's degrees, majors, and/or minors: No The course is a GEC: No The course is an elective (for this or other units) or is a service course for other units: Yes Subject/CIP Code: 14.1001 Subsidy Level: Doctoral Course Programs Abbreviation Description CpE Computer Engineering EE Electrical Engineering Course Goals Master principles of neural interfaces. Be competent with computational neural models. Be competent with design of common neuroprostheses.
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Engineering Engineering Is at the Heart of Society, Underpinning and Continually Improving the Quality of Our Lives
    The Royal Academy of Engineering UK Focus for Biomedical Engineering Policy Briefing Neural engineering Engineering is at the heart of society, underpinning and continually improving the quality of our lives. The Royal Academy of Engineering brings together the country’s most eminent engineers from all disciplines to promote excellence and support the engineering performance of the UK. Biomedical engineering creates new medical technologies and systems that can greatly improve patient care and quality of life. The UK Focus for Biomedical Engineering is the Academy’s forum for this increasingly important area of engineering in which the UK is taking a lead. Introduction interfacing technology directly with the A second example of neuroprosthetics human nervous system. is deep brain stimulation (DBS), which Biomedical engineering is constantly involves the surgical implantation of a expanding and extending the areas There are already real-world clinical medical device called a brain pacemaker of application within healthcare. solutions for areas such as controlling that sends electrical pulses to very Technological developments, coupled essential tremor through implants in with a stronger understanding of specific parts of the brain. While DBS in deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s biological processes brought about specific brain regions has provided very Disease, vagal nerve stimulation for help by cutting-edge research, create new good therapeutic benefits for otherwise in controlling epilepsy, and the use of areas within biomedical engineering. treatment-resistant movement and Neural engineering is one such recent cochlear implants to restore hearing in affective disorders such as chronic pain development. the profoundly deaf (neuroprosthetics). and dystonia, it is in Parkinson’s disease and tremor that DBS is best known.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Curriculum in Neural Engineering with Emphasis on Design of Neural Systems
    Session ???? A New Curriculum in Neural Engineering with Emphasis on Design of Neural Systems John R. Hetling, Christopher M. Comer*, and Richard L. Magin Departments of Bioengineering / *Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago Introduction. Academic and commercial research teams are currently developing a new generation of devices that will interact with, incorporate, and/or emulate living nervous systems. Neural prostheses to restore hearing, mobility or sight will offer a wider range of function; robotic devices will become more effective with “neuromorphic” control systems; fundamentally new methods for processing information will be motivated by biological systems. Neural Engineering is the intellectual force behind these developments, supported by recent advances in cellular neurobiology, microfabrication and neural modeling. Based on decades of quantitative approaches to increase our understanding of neural systems, bioengineers are now beginning to design neural systems and neural interfaces. Neural engineers have new tools to control aspects of these systems such as guided axon growth and multielectrode arrays for stimulation and recording. In addition to potential applications attracting the attention of biotech and defense industries, these efforts in turn increase our understanding of natural neural systems. One of the most intriguing aspects of contemporary Neural Engineering is the increasing degree to which scientists can repair and exploit the properties of neural systems, including applications such as neural prostheses, biosensors, or hybrid neural computing devices. The former application currently supports significant industrial involvement; for example, Clarion and Medtronic have commercially available cochlear implants, and Optobionics Inc. (IL) and Second Sight (CA) are companies developing prostheses for vision (in existence for approximately 14 and 4 years, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Intention, Emotion, and Action: a Neural Theory Based on Semantic Pointers
    Cognitive Science 38 (2014) 851–880 Copyright © 2013 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 0364-0213 print / 1551-6709 online DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12100 Intention, Emotion, and Action: A Neural Theory Based on Semantic Pointers Tobias Schroder,€ Terrence C. Stewart, Paul Thagard Department of Philosophy, University of Waterloo Received 14 May 2012; received in revised form 3 March 2013; accepted 28 March 2013 Abstract We propose a unified theory of intentions as neural processes that integrate representations of states of affairs, actions, and emotional evaluation. We show how this theory provides answers to philosophical questions about the concept of intention, psychological questions about human behav- ior, computational questions about the relations between belief and action, and neuroscientific questions about how the brain produces actions. Our theory of intention ties together biologically plausible mechanisms for belief, planning, and motor control. The computational feasibility of these mechanisms is shown by a model that simulates psychologically important cases of intention. Keywords: Intention; Emotion; Action; Implementation intentions; Automatic; Deliberative; Planning; Neural engineering framework; Semantic pointers 1. The problem of explaining intention The concept of intention is important in many disciplines, including philosophy, psy- chology, artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, and law. For example, criminal law treats cases where one person intends to kill another very differently from cases where death results unintentionally from negligence. Despite decades of discussions, how- ever, there is no received theory of intention within any of these disciplines, let alone a theory that accounts for all the phenomena identified across all of the disciplines. We propose a unified theory of intentions as neural processes that integrate representa- tions of states of affairs, actions, and emotional evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • New Technologies for Human Robot Interaction and Neuroprosthetics
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics 2017-07-01 Human-Robot Interaction and Neuroprosthetics: A review of new technologies Cangelosi, A http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9872 10.1109/MCE.2016.2614423 IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. CEMAG-OA-0004-Mar-2016.R3 1 New Technologies for Human Robot Interaction and Neuroprosthetics Angelo Cangelosi, Sara Invitto Abstract—New technologies in the field of neuroprosthetics and These developments in neuroprosthetics are closely linked to robotics are leading to the development of innovative commercial the recent significant investment and progress in research on products based on user-centered, functional processes of cognitive neural networks and deep learning approaches to robotics and neuroscience and perceptron studies. The aim of this review is to autonomous systems [2][3]. Specifically, one key area of analyze this innovative path through the description of some of the development has been that of cognitive robots for human-robot latest neuroprosthetics and human-robot interaction applications, in particular the Brain Computer Interface linked to haptic interaction and assistive robotics. This concerns the design of systems, interactive robotics and autonomous systems. These robot companions for the elderly, social robots for children with issues will be addressed by analyzing developmental robotics and disabilities such as Autism Spectrum Disorders, and robot examples of neurorobotics research.
    [Show full text]
  • Brain-Machine Interface: from Neurophysiology to Clinical
    Neurophysiology of Brain-Machine Interface Rehabilitation Matija Milosevic, Osaka University - Graduate School of Engineering Science - Japan. Abstract— Long-lasting cortical re-organization or II. METHODS neuroplasticity depends on the ability to synchronize the descending (voluntary) commands and the successful execution Stimulation of muscles with FES was delivered using a of the task using a neuroprosthetic. This talk will discuss the constant current biphasic waveform with a 300μs pulse width neurophysiological mechanisms of brain-machine interface at 50 Hz frequency via surface electrodes. First, repetitive (BMI) controlled neuroprosthetics with the aim to provide transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) intermittent theta implications for development of technologies for rehabilitation. burst protocol (iTBS) was used to induce cortical facilitation. iTBS protocol consists of pulses delivered intermittently at a I. INTRODUCTION frequency of 50 Hz and 5 Hz for a total of 200 seconds. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) neuroprosthetics Moreover, motor imagery protocol was used to display a can be used to applying short electric impulses over the virtual reality hand opening and closing sequence of muscles or the nerves to generate hand muscle contractions movements (hand flexion/extension) while subject’s hands and functional movements such as reaching and grasping. remained at rest and out of the visual field. Our work has shown that recruitment of muscles using FES goes beyond simple contractions, with evidence suggesting III. RESULTS re-organization of the spinal reflex networks and cortical- Our first results showed that motor imagery can affect level changes after the stimulating period [1,2]. However, a major challenge remains in achieving precise temporal corticospinal facilitation in a phase-dependent manner, i.e., synchronization of voluntary commands and activation of the hand flexor muscles during hand closing and extensor muscles [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Practical and Ethical Issues at the Intersection of Brain Science and Society
    Emerging Neurotechnologies: Practical and Ethical Issues at the Intersection of Brain Science and Society James Giordano PhD Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry Neuroethics Studies Program, Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics Georgetown University Medical Center Washington, DC, USA and EU-Human Brain Project SP-12 Uppsala University, Sweden Neuroscience… • Huge leaps using technology to study and understand how nervous systems and brains are structured and function. Allowed understanding at certain levels of causality: – Formal: Overall “workings” of biological systems – Material: Structure and functional roles of neurons, glia But not at others… – Efficient: How “grey stuff” actually makes “great stuff” – Final: For what? To what “ends”? Core Questions... What do we do with the information and capability we have? What do we do about the information and capability we don’t? Questions toward Innovation • Tools to Theory • Theory to Tools... ...to Theory AISC Approach Brain Science on the World Stage • EU Human Brain Project • US BRAIN initiative • China Brain Project • Japan Brain Project • Global NeuroS/T Economic Predictions 2025 – Asia – US/Western Europe – South America Neuroscience and Technologies (NeuroS/T) • Assessment – Biomarkers – Genetics/genomics – Imaging – Brain modeling/mapping • Interventional – Technopharmaceutics – P-Stim – Neurofeedback – Transcranial Modulation – Deep Brain Stimulation – BCI – Neuroprosthetics • Derivative – -Artificial neural networks – -AI technologies A-3: Actual Ability to Assess...Access...Affect To What Effect(s) and Ends? Neuroimaging – PET – CT – MR – fMR – DTI – MEG/qEEG Can we Scan the Brain to Depict Consciousness and/or “Read” Minds? text copyright, J. Giordano, 2014 Neurogenetics – Genotyping – Phenotyping – Proteomics – Genetic Intervention(s) Can we “Predict” or “Create” Present and Future “Selves”? text copyright, J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Neural Engineering Track Within Bioengineering: Lecture and Lab Courses
    2006-2510: A NEURAL ENGINEERING TRACK WITHIN BIOENGINEERING: LECTURE AND LAB COURSES David Schneeweis, University of Illinois-Chicago J Hetling, University of Illinois-Chicago Patrick Rousche, University of Illinois-Chicago Page 11.77.1 Page © American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A NEURAL ENGINEERING TRACK WITHIN BIOENGINEERING: LECTURE AND LAB COURSES Neural engineering as a distinct specialty within bioengineering Neural engineering (also called neuroengineering) has recently been identified as an emerging field of specialization within the broader field of biomedical engineering, or bioengineering. (The terms “biomedical engineering” and “bioengineering” are virtually synonymous in most contexts, so “bioengineering” will be used in this article for simplicity.) Neural engineers self-identify as engineers/scientists interested in engineering challenges related to the brain and nervous system. It has been referred to as a “merger of engineering and neuroscience” [1]. Many neural engineers work on clinically oriented challenges, including for example developing sensory prostheses for the deaf and blind or designing systems to stimulate walking motion in the legs of spinal chord injury patients. But other neural engineers are interested primarily in understanding how the brain and nervous system work, or are affected by disease. Although engineers and scientists have been doing this kind of work for decades, it is only within the last decade or so that neural engineering has become recognized as a named sub- specialty. Indeed it has only been recently that “neural engineering” has existed as a distinct subject track at the annual meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society. But the field is rapidly growing as witnessed by the establishment of the Journal of Neural Engineering in 2004, and the holding of the 1st International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework to Assess the Military Ethics of Human Enhancement Technologies
    2017-06-09 DRDC-RDDC-2017-L167 Produced for: Paul Comeau, DRDC Chief Scientist Scientific Letter A Framework to Assess the Military Ethics of Human Enhancement Technologies Key Points . Human enhancements may be achieved through devices or drugs that augment or modify human performance. Militaries have used enhancements for years to improve soldier performance. Science and technology progress in human enhancements have outpaced regulatory policies. Emerging enhancements may raise ethical questions and face policy barriers that impede their development, evaluation and eventual adoption by the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF). It is imperative to consider the military ethical issues raised by human enhancement technologies before they are adopted by the CAF. A framework was developed to assess the military ethical issues associated with human enhancements. Identifying potential ethical issues early will enable policymakers to design policies that ensure the safe and ethical use of human enhancements, and will also allow the CAF to be prepared to deal with enhanced adversaries. Background Human enhancement has been defined in the literature in various ways.1-3 We define it herein as any science and technology (S&T) approach that temporarily or permanently modifies or contributes to human functioning. S&T efforts to enhance human health and performance are not new; vaccines (considered enhancements because they augment the immune system’s ability to protect against disease) have been used since the 18th century.4 Human enhancements permeate many aspects of society. Wearable health monitors like FitBits, which can inform changes in behaviour to improve health,5,6 are used by millions of people worldwide.
    [Show full text]