Zambia 1991 – 1993 Jon Hall

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zambia 1991 – 1993 Jon Hall Zambia 1991 – 1993 Jon Hall Lions, South Luangwa I lived in Zambia throughout 1991 and went back twice on holiday. I am still in love with the country, the people and the bush. Mammals were pretty sparse over much of the place, but national parks like Northern Kafue and South Luangwa are world class. In the early 1990s at least, the emphasis in the parks was on more expensive safari camps and fewer people than in some other bits of the continent. As a result it was not uncommon to spend several hours on morning, evening and night safaris and not see another vehicle. I haven’t been there since 1993 and things are bound to have changed, hopefully for the better. Black Lechwe, Bangwelu Bangwelu Swamps 2 nights August 1993 - not a fantastic spot for mammals, but an interesting place more famous for its Shoebill Storks. Walking across the floating matted vegetation was an experience. I saw Southern Reedbuck, Lechwe, Topi (Tsessebe) and Oribi. Shoebill Camp, Bangwelu I also drove the Landcruiser off the causeway (hey... I thought I saw a rat swimming in the swamp) but the less said about that the better. Oops... Canoeing in Kasanka Kasanka, several days in January 1992 and August 1993 - a rather nondescript sort of a place, but with excellent Sitatunga viewing, and a spectacular fruit bat camp each Christmas. During two short visits I saw South African Galago and Brown Greater Galago, Southern Reedbuck, Yellow Baboon, Puku, Waterbuck, Red (Lichtensein’s) Hartebeest, Bush Duiker, Malbrouk (formerly Vervet) Monkey, Straw-coloured Fruit Bat and Sitatunga. Northern Kafue (Mufupwa lodge), July 91 – an excellent area for finding some of the more unusual mammals in Zambia. The guys at the lodge – in 1991 at least – burnt a good deal of the grass around the place which helped the spotlighting no end. This is one of the few places where Aardvark are often reported. Not – I hate to say – by me. During a 3 night stay I saw Chacma Baboon, Leopard, Lion, Burchell’s Zebra, Serval (my first and only sighting), White-tailed Mongoose, Angolan Genet, Greater Kudu, Bushbuck, Warthog, African Buffalo, Savanna Hare, Puku, Lechwe, Waterbuck, Cape Porcupine, Red (Lichtenstein’s) Hartebeest , Roan Antelope, Smith’s Bush Squirrel, Malbrouk (formerly Vervet) Monkey, Blue Wildebeest, Side-striped Jackal, Impala. Zebra, Southern Kafue Southern Kafue, Easter 91 – a disappointing trip to Southen Kafue, though it was the worse time of year for game viewing. The end of the wet season means animals are dispersed and the grass is long. That said, I still saw Chacma Baboon, Southern Reedbuck, Burchell’s Zebra Warthog, African Buffalo, Savanna Hare, Puku, Waterbuck, Smith’s Bush Squirrel, Hippo, Malbrouk (formerly Vervet) Monkey, Blue Wildebeest, Rock Hyrax, Impala. Sunset, Kafue NP Luangwa River, near Chamalandu Camp South Luangwa, trips in October 91, December 92 and August 93 – a glorious national park, with few visitors and one hell of a lot of wildlife. Rightly famous for its Leopards, it has a wide collection of interesting wildlife, including some nice mongoose species, and abundant Elephant Shews. During the 15 or so nights I’ve spent in the park I’ve see Giraffe (the Thornicroft subspecies), Angolan (Large spotted) Genet, Yellow Baboon, Leopard (5 different sightings in one night!), Leopard, South Lunagwa. Christmas morning, 1992. Lion, Burchell’s Zebra, White-tailed Mongoose, Meller’s Mongoose (this seems to be one of the few places in Africa where they are regularly reported), Dwarf Mongoose, Common Slender Mongoose, Elephant, Warthog, African Buffalo, Savanna Hare, Puku, Waterbuck, Cape Porcupine, Hippo, African Civet, Smith’s Bush Squirrel Spotted Hyena, South Luangwa Four-toed Elephant Shrew (often), Malbrouk (formerly Vervet) Monkey, Blue Wildebeest (Cookson’s subspecies), Spotted Hyena, Red (Lichtenstein’s) Hartebeest, Sharpe’s Grysbok, Bushveld Gerbil (around Chamalandu Camp). Elephant, Chiawa Camp Zambezi Valley, overnight canoe trip and 3 nights at Chiawa Camp – during the canoe trip down the Zambezi I saw Elephant, Hippo, Rock Hyrax and Klipspringer. At the pretty speccy Chiawa camp I saw Chacma Baboon, Lion, Burchell’s Zebra, Wild Cat, Elephant, Greater Kudu, Bushbuck, Eland, Warthog, African Buffalo, Savanna Hare, Puku, Waterbuck, Cape Porcupine, Hippo, African Civet, Smith’s Bush Squirrel, Marsh Mongoose (rare), Vervet Monkey, Spotted Hyena, Impala. African Scops Owl, North Luangwa .
Recommended publications
  • Pending World Record Waterbuck Wins Top Honor SC Life Member Susan Stout Has in THIS ISSUE Dbeen Awarded the President’S Cup Letter from the President
    DSC NEWSLETTER VOLUME 32,Camp ISSUE 5 TalkJUNE 2019 Pending World Record Waterbuck Wins Top Honor SC Life Member Susan Stout has IN THIS ISSUE Dbeen awarded the President’s Cup Letter from the President .....................1 for her pending world record East African DSC Foundation .....................................2 Defassa Waterbuck. Awards Night Results ...........................4 DSC’s April Monthly Meeting brings Industry News ........................................8 members together to celebrate the annual Chapter News .........................................9 Trophy and Photo Award presentation. Capstick Award ....................................10 This year, there were over 150 entries for Dove Hunt ..............................................12 the Trophy Awards, spanning 22 countries Obituary ..................................................14 and almost 100 different species. Membership Drive ...............................14 As photos of all the entries played Kid Fish ....................................................16 during cocktail hour, the room was Wine Pairing Dinner ............................16 abuzz with stories of all the incredible Traveler’s Advisory ..............................17 adventures experienced – ibex in Spain, Hotel Block for Heritage ....................19 scenic helicopter rides over the Northwest Big Bore Shoot .....................................20 Territories, puku in Zambia. CIC International Conference ..........22 In determining the winners, the judges DSC Publications Update
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife and Wild Places in Mozambique K
    Wildlife and Wild Places in Mozambique K. L Tinley, A. J. Rosinha, Jose L. P. Lobao Tello and T. P. Dutton This account of the national parks, reserves and other places worthy of pro- tection in Mozambique gives some idea of the wealth of wildlife in this newly independent country. One special reserve has 25,000 buffaloes—the largest concentration in the world. Protected conservation areas in Mozambique fall into six categories: 1. Parques nacionais - national parks; 2. Reservas especiais - special game reserves; 3. Reservas parciais - partial reserves; 4. Regimen de vigilancia - fauna protection zones; 5. Coutadas - hunting and photographic safari areas, normally run on a private concession basis; 6. Reservas florestais - forest reserves. Some unique areas are still outside this system but have been recommended for inclusion, together with other ecosystems worthy of inclusion in the future. Game farming or ranching is attracting considerable interest; one private and one government scheme have been proposed. NATIONAL PARKS 1.* Parque Nacional da Gorongosa (c. 3770 sq km). Situated at the southern limit of the great rift valley with an extensive flood plain and associated lakes, this park includes Brachystegia woodland Acacia and Combretum savanna. Sharply rising inselbergs (volcanic protrusions) are also a feature. The ungulates are typical floodplain species, including elephant (abundant), buffalo, wildebeest, waterbuck, zebra, reedbuck, impala and oribi; on the elevated woodland and savanna habitat there are black rhino, eland, Lichten- stein's hartebeest, sable, kudu, nyala, Sharpe's grysbok, suni, blue and grey duiker, and klipspringer are common on rock outcrops; lion, leopard and hippopotamus are abundant. Both land and water birds are prolific and diverse, and crocodiles are very common.
    [Show full text]
  • A Scoping Review of Viral Diseases in African Ungulates
    veterinary sciences Review A Scoping Review of Viral Diseases in African Ungulates Hendrik Swanepoel 1,2, Jan Crafford 1 and Melvyn Quan 1,* 1 Vectors and Vector-Borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Disease, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0110, South Africa; [email protected] (H.S.); [email protected] (J.C.) 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +27-12-529-8142 Abstract: (1) Background: Viral diseases are important as they can cause significant clinical disease in both wild and domestic animals, as well as in humans. They also make up a large proportion of emerging infectious diseases. (2) Methods: A scoping review of peer-reviewed publications was performed and based on the guidelines set out in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews. (3) Results: The final set of publications consisted of 145 publications. Thirty-two viruses were identified in the publications and 50 African ungulates were reported/diagnosed with viral infections. Eighteen countries had viruses diagnosed in wild ungulates reported in the literature. (4) Conclusions: A comprehensive review identified several areas where little information was available and recommendations were made. It is recommended that governments and research institutions offer more funding to investigate and report viral diseases of greater clinical and zoonotic significance. A further recommendation is for appropriate One Health approaches to be adopted for investigating, controlling, managing and preventing diseases. Diseases which may threaten the conservation of certain wildlife species also require focused attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Price List 2021 NORTH AMERICAN SHOULDER Wall Ped Floor
    Price List 2021 NORTH AMERICAN SHOULDER Wall Ped Floor Ped 1/2 LS LIFESIZE SKULL MT BADGER $507.82 $583.99 $609.38 $1,066.42 $1,777.37 $253.91 BEAR, BLACK $1,241.34 N/A $1,489.61 $2,606.81 $4,344.69 $451.40 BEAR, BROWN $1,692.74 N/A $2,031.28 $3,554.74 $5,924.57 $615.54 BEAR, GRIZZLY $2,031.28 N/A $2,437.54 $4,265.69 $7,109.49 $738.65 BEAR, POLAR $2,200.56 N/A $2,640.67 $4,621.17 $7,701.94 $800.20 BISON $2,200.56 N/A $2,640.67 $4,621.17 $7,701.94 $800.20 BOBCAT $451.40 $519.11 $541.68 $947.93 $1,579.89 $225.70 CARIBOU $1,241.34 $1,427.54 $1,489.61 $2,606.81 $4,344.69 $451.40 CATTLE-Steer, Bull, Cow $2,144.13 $2,465.75 $2,572.96 $4,502.68 $7,504.46 $779.68 COYOTE $372.40 $428.26 $446.88 $782.04 $1,303.41 $186.20 DEER, MULE $846.37 $973.32 $1,015.64 $2,285.19 $3,808.65 $307.77 DEER, WHITETAIL $800.00 $920.00 $960.00 $2,160.00 $3,600.00 $290.91 ELK $1,692.74 N/A $2,031.28 $5,078.21 $8,463.68 $425.00 FOX, GRAY or RED $451.40 $519.11 $541.68 $947.93 $1,579.89 $225.70 GOAT, MOUNTAIN $970.50 $1,116.08 $1,164.60 $2,038.05 $3,396.75 $352.91 JAVELINA $744.80 $856.52 $893.76 $1,564.09 $2,606.81 $270.84 LION, MOUNTAIN $1,354.19 $1,557.32 $1,625.03 $2,843.79 $4,739.66 $492.43 LYNX $733.52 $843.55 $880.22 $1,540.39 $2,567.31 $266.73 MOOSE $2,200.56 $2,530.64 $2,640.67 $4,621.17 $7,701.94 $800.20 PRONGHORN ANTELOPE $846.37 $973.32 $1,015.64 $1,777.37 $2,962.29 $307.77 RACCOON $451.40 $519.11 $541.68 $947.93 $1,579.89 $164.14 SHEEP, DALL $1,354.19 $1,557.32 $1,625.03 $2,843.79 $4,739.66 $492.43 SHEEP- $1,354.19 $1,557.32 $1,625.03 $3,656.31 $492.43 Bighorn,Desert,Stone,Snow
    [Show full text]
  • Redunca Arundinum – Southern Reedbuck
    Redunca arundinum – Southern Reedbuck Assessment Rationale Although this species has declined across much of its former range within the assessment region, subpopulations have been reintroduced throughout much of its range, with sizeable numbers on private land. The mature population size is at least 3,884 on both formally protected areas and private lands (2010–2015 counts), which is an underestimate as not all private sector data are available. The largest subpopulation (420–840 mature individuals) occurs in iSimangaliso Wetland Park in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN). Based on a sample of 21 protected areas across the range of Southern Reedbuck, the overall Andre Botha population has increased by c. 68–80% over three generations (1997/2002–2015), which is driven primarily by the Free State protected areas, which have Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern* experienced an average annual growth rate of 18% National Red List status (2004) Least Concern between 2006 and 2014. In the absence of the growth in the Free State, there has been a net 10–22% decline in the Reasons for change No change remaining 11 protected areas. This species experiences Global Red List status (2016) Least Concern local declines as it is vulnerable to poaching, illegal sport hunting and persecution, and demand for live animals for TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) Protected trade (possibly illegally taken from the wild). Empirical CITES listing None data indicate declines in some protected areas in KZN and North West provinces due to poaching, and anecdotal Endemic No reports suggest more severe declines outside protected *Watch-list Data areas due to poaching, sport hunting and habitat loss or degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 the Mammals of Angola
    Chapter 15 The Mammals of Angola Pedro Beja, Pedro Vaz Pinto, Luís Veríssimo, Elena Bersacola, Ezequiel Fabiano, Jorge M. Palmeirim, Ara Monadjem, Pedro Monterroso, Magdalena S. Svensson, and Peter John Taylor Abstract Scientific investigations on the mammals of Angola started over 150 years ago, but information remains scarce and scattered, with only one recent published account. Here we provide a synthesis of the mammals of Angola based on a thorough survey of primary and grey literature, as well as recent unpublished records. We present a short history of mammal research, and provide brief information on each species known to occur in the country. Particular attention is given to endemic and near endemic species. We also provide a zoogeographic outline and information on the conservation of Angolan mammals. We found confirmed records for 291 native species, most of which from the orders Rodentia (85), Chiroptera (73), Carnivora (39), and Cetartiodactyla (33). There is a large number of endemic and near endemic species, most of which are rodents or bats. The large diversity of species is favoured by the wide P. Beja (*) CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal CEABN-InBio, Centro de Ecologia Aplicada “Professor Baeta Neves”, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] P. Vaz Pinto Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] L. Veríssimo Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola e-mail: [email protected] E.
    [Show full text]
  • CENSUS TECHNIQUES for SOUTHERN REEDBUCK Redunca Arundinum on FORESTRY LANDS in the DRAKENSBERGINATAL MIDLANDS
    CENSUS TECHNIQUES FOR SOUTHERN REEDBUCK Redunca arundinum ON FORESTRY LANDS IN THE DRAKENSBERGINATAL MIDLANDS Component A: LITERATURE REVIEW R.S. Boyes Centre for Environment & Development, ~University ofNatal, Private Bag XOl, ScottsviUe, 3209, South Africa ~L <4 Ziaasz L CENSUS TECHNIQUES FOR SOUTHERN REEDBUCK Redunca arundinum ON FORESTRY LANDS IN THE DRAKENSBERGI NATAL MIDLANDS Component A: Literature Review By R.S. Boyes Centre for Environment & Development, University ofNatal, Private Bag XO 1, Scottsville, 3209, South Africa Submitted in partial fulfilment ofthe requirements for the degree of Master ofEnviromnent & Development (Protected Areas Management) in the Centre for Environment & Development, University ofNatal, Pietermaritzburg. NOVEMBER 2003 11 12 November 2003 I hereby declare that this dissertation, "Census Techniques for Southern Reedbuck Redunca arundinum on Forestry Lands in the DrakensbergfNatal Midlands" is original work done between January 2003 and November 2003 at the Centre for Environment and Development in partnership with the School of Botany and Zoology (University of Natal). This study has not been published or submitted towards any other degree at any other university. Rutledge Stephen Boyes Mike Perrin Supervisor ..... ~ ...R..9.~ ..... JP g CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ·.···.··.················..1 2. PREVIOUS RESEARCH 2.1 Previous research on southern reedbuck Redunca arundinum 7 2.2 Previous research on members ofthe Reduncinae 7 2.3 Previous research on similar antelope species in the Drakensberg/ Natal Midlands 8 3. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OUTLINING THE CONTEXT OF THE STUDy 8 4. STUDY SITE: MOUNT SHANNON ESTATE. : I0 5. EVALUATION OF HISTORICAL GAME COUNT RESULTS FOR THE BOSTON AND MERRIVALE CONSERVANCIES 13 6. CONTEXTUALISING REEDBUCK MANAGEMENT 6.1 Conservation status 17 6.2 Population status and distribution 18 6.3 Reedbuck ecology 19 6.4 Physiological condition 26 6.5 Reedbuck management on privately-owned farmland 27 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Predation Losses on Wildlife Ranches in Limpopo Province, South Africa
    The impact of predation losses on wildlife ranches in Limpopo Province, South Africa th 9 International Wildlife Ranching Symposium Safari Hotel, Windhoek, Namibia 12-16 September 2016 Anche Schepers, Walter van Niekerk, Nicolette Matthews & HO de Waal ALPRU (Africal Large Predator Research Unit / Canis-Caracal Programme (CCP) Department of Animal, Wildlife and Grassland Sciences [email protected] T: +27(0)51 401 9111 | [email protected] | www.ufs.ac.za Presented against the backdrop of Coordinated Predation Management - discussed in the context of Livestock Production Wildlife Ranching Biodiversity and Conservation South Africa is endowed with diverse flora and fauna … many large African herbivores have disappeared from the landscape … … except when contained behind appropriate fences … … similarly many large African carnivores have disappeared from the landscape, except when confined behind appropriate fences Photo credits: Willie Combrinck, Nico Smit, Julia Salnicki Some large African herbivores are very dangerous … … these large herbivores are easily contained behind appropriate fences, but they eat plants … Photo credits: Willie Combrinck The large African carnivores are very dangerous … Nico Smit, 2004 … large carnivores can be contained behind appropriate fences, but they still eat flesh … G van Wyk, 2005 Masequa (Du Plessis & Smit, 2005) Nico Smit, 2004 Large and medium- sized African predators are increasingly …especially these conflicting with human two medium-sized activities … predators… Canis adustus Panthera leo Acinonyx jubatus
    [Show full text]
  • Oribi Zebra Puku SECTION 131-THE NATIONAL PARKS and WILDLIFE
    chambered to take a nitro-express cartridge. Eland, Kudu, Rifled and nitro-proofed firearm of a calibre of not less Leopard, Lion, than 7.6 mm (.300 of an inch) chambered to take a nitro- Roan Antelope, express cartridge: Provided that in the case of a wounded Sable Antelope, leopard or lion a shotgun may also be used when Zebra following up and despatching such wounded animal. Buffalo 1. Rifled and nitro-proofed breech-loading firearm of a calibre of not less than 7.6 mm (.300 of an inch) chambered to take a nitro-express cartridge; 2. Muzzle-loading firearm. Game animals other than 1. Rifled and nitro-proofed breech-loading firearm of those specified above a calibre of not less than 6 mm (.240 of an inch) chambered to take a nitro-express cartridge; 2. Shot gun; 3. Muzzle-loading firearm. All birds specified in the 1. Rifled and nitro-proofed breech-loading firearm of First Schedule to the Act not less than 5.5 mm (.22 of an inch); 2. Shotgun; 3. Muzzle-loading firearm. SECOND SCHEDULE (Regulation 3) Specified game and protected animals: Bushbuck Reedbuck Duiker, all species Roan Eland Sable Game birds Sitatunga Grysbok Steinbok Hartebeest, Liechtenstein Tsessebe Klipspringer Warthog Kudu Waterbuck Lechwe, all species Wildebeest, all species Oribi Zebra Puku SECTION 131-THE NATIONAL PARKS AND Statutory Instrument No. WILDLIFE (PRESCRIBED TROPHIES) 61 of 1993 REGULATIONS Regulations by the Minister 1. These Regulations may be cited as the National Parks and Wildlife Title (Prescribed Trophies) Regulations. 2. For the purpose of controlling dealings in trophies, any trophy Prescribed described, or belonging to a class of trophies described, in the Schedule trophies shall be a prescribed trophy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Red Lechwe of Busanga Plain, Zambia a Conservation Success G
    The red lechwe of Busanga Plain, Zambia a conservation success G. W. Howard and H. N. Chabwela When the Kafue National Park was established in 1950 the northern boundary was drawn to include the Busanga Plain, where there was a small population of red lechwe, much reduced by hunting. The effect of the protection was striking: numbers began to increase immediately and by 1973 there were 2000 individuals. In 1985 the authors conducted censuses to establish how the antelopes had fared in the intervening years. Their findings reveal just how successful the conservation measures have been. The red lechwe Kobus leche leche is the most that part of Busanga Plain occupied by red widespread of the three subspecies of lechwe lechwe. This population had been reduced by antelope in central-southern Africa. While the hunting to just over 100 animals at that time black lechwe K /. smithemani is now confined to (Grimsdell and Bell, 1972), and it was hoped that the Bangweulu Swamps, and the Kafue lechwe the protection afforded by national park status K. /. kafuensis to the central Kafue Flats, the red would allow the lechwe to regain their former lechwe is still likely to be present in southern numbers. The Busanga red lechwe herd res- Zaire, Angola, Namibia (Caprivi Strip) and Bot- ponded to this protection, and had increased to swana as well as central and western Zambia. 1163 by July 1971 (Grimsdell and Bell, 1972) However, in Zambia the red lechwe has declined and to 'about 2000' in 1973 (Clarke and Loe, in numbers and distribution in all populations 1974), by which time it was becoming the largest except one, which is protected on the Busanga concentration of this subspecies in Zambia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals, Birds, Herps
    Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 3 - 6 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 3 : REDUNCINE ANTELOPE ........................ 145 3.1 Introduction ................................................................. 145 3.2 Phylogenetic origins and palaeontological background 146 3.3 Social organisation and behaviour .............................. 150 3.4 Population status and historical declines ................... 151 3.5 Taxonomy and status of Reduncine populations ......... 159 3.6 What are the species of Reduncine antelopes? ............ 168 3.7 Evolution of Reduncine antelopes in the Zambezi Basin ....................................................................... 177 3.8 Conservation ................................................................ 190 3.9 Conclusions and recommendations ............................. 192 3.10 References .................................................................... 194 TABLE 3.4 : Checklist of wetland antelopes occurring in the principal Zambezi Basin wetlands .................. 181 CHAPTER 4 : SMALL MAMMALS ................................. 201 4.1 Introduction ..................................................... .......... 201 4.2 Barotseland small mammals survey ........................... 201 4.3 Zambezi Delta small mammal survey ....................... 204 4.4 References .................................................................. 210 CHAPTER 5 : WETLAND BIRDS ...................................... 213 5.1 Introduction ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CEE Review 10-00 EFFECTIVENESS of TER AREAS in REDUCING BI
    Geldmann et al., 2013 Collaboration for Environmental Evidence Library CEE review 10-00 7 EFFECTIVENESS OF TER RESTRIAL PROTECTED AREAS IN REDUCING BI ODIVERSITY AND HABITAT LOSS Systematic Review 1 2,3 4 5 2 GELDMANN , J. , BARNES , M. , COAD , L. , CRAIGIE , I. D. , HOCKINGS , M. & 1, 6 BURGESS , N. 1 Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 2School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, University of Queensland, Australia 3 Environmental Decisions Group, http://www.edg.org.au/ 4 Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography, University of Oxford, 12 Oxford, OX1 3QY, United Kingdom 5ARC Centre of Exc ellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University , Queensland, Australia 6 The United Nations Environment Programme – World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge. UK. Correspondence: [email protected] Draft protocol published on website: 21 May 2010 - Final protocol published on website: 28 October 2010 - Draft review published on website: 2 December 2011 Final review posted on website: 7March 2013. Cite as : Geldmann, J. , Barnes, M. , Coad, L. , Craigie, I., Hockings, M. & Burgess, N. 2013. Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing biodiversity and habitat loss . CEE 10-007 . Collaboration for Environmental Evidence: www.en vironmentalevidence.org/ SR10007 .html. 1 Summary Background Protected areas cover up to 15.5% of the planet’s land surface and are amongst the most important tool to maintain habitat integrity and species diversity. Unfortunately, despite the increase in coverage, there is considerable debate over the extent to which protected areas deliver conservation outcomes in terms of species populations, habitat coverage, or habitat condition.
    [Show full text]