DOCSLIB.ORG

DRAFT Johnson County Natural Resource Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DRAFT Johnson County Natural Resource Management Plan AUGUST 17, 2020 DRAFT Johnson County Natural Resource Management Plan Natural Resource Management Plan Y2 Consultants, LLC & Falen Law Offices (Intentionally Left Blank) CONTENTS ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................... IV LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................. VIII LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... IX INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................ 1 PLAN ORGANIZATION ........................................................................................................................ 5 PROCESS ......................................................................................................................................... 5 AMENDING THE NRMP ..................................................................................................................... 6 COUNTY EXPECTATIONS FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN ..................................................... 6 CHAPTER 1: CUSTOM AND CULTURE ...................................................................................... 8 1.1 COUNTY INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ........................................................................................ 8 CHAPTER 2: LAND USE ......................................................................................................... 11 2.1 LAND USE ............................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 TRANSPORTATION AND LAND ACCESS ........................................................................................... 14 2.3 SPECIAL DESIGNATION AND MANAGEMENT AREAS .......................................................................... 18 2.4 WILDFIRE SUPPRESSION, FUELS MANAGEMENT, FIRE REHABILITATION AND COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PLANNING ..................................................................................................................................... 28 2.5 FOREST MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................................. 31 2.6 LAND EXCHANGES ..................................................................................................................... 33 CHAPTER 3: GEOLOGY, MINING, AND AIR ............................................................................ 35 3.1 GEOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 35 3.2 MINING & MINERAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................. 37 3.3 ENERGY RESOURCES .................................................................................................................. 41 3.4 AIR QUALITY ............................................................................................................................ 47 i | P a g e Natural Resource Management Plan 3.5 CLIMATE CHANGE ..................................................................................................................... 49 3.6 SOILS...................................................................................................................................... 50 CHAPTER 4: WATER RESOURCES .......................................................................................... 53 4.1 IRRIGATION AND RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................. 55 4.2 DAMS AND RESERVOIRS ............................................................................................................. 56 4.3 WATER RIGHTS ........................................................................................................................ 57 4.4 WATER QUALITY ...................................................................................................................... 59 4.5 FLOOD PLAINS.......................................................................................................................... 63 4.6 RIVERS AND STREAMS ................................................................................................................ 64 4.7 WETLANDS AND RIPARIAN AREAS ................................................................................................ 65 CHAPTER 5: WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES .................................................................................. 67 5.1 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES ...................................................................................... 69 5.2 GENERAL WILDLIFE AND SENSITIVE SPECIES ................................................................................... 72 5.3 FISHERIES ................................................................................................................................ 83 5.4 WILD HORSE, BURROS AND ESTRAY LIVESTOCK .............................................................................. 86 CHAPTER 6: ECONOMICS & SOCIETY .................................................................................... 89 6.1 TOURISM AND RECREATION ON FEDERAL LANDS ............................................................................. 89 6.2 LAW ENFORCEMENT .................................................................................................................. 91 6.3 CULTURAL, HISTORICAL, & PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES .............................................................. 91 6.4 ECONOMIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................... 96 CHAPTER 7: AGRICULUTRE ................................................................................................... 98 7.1 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 98 7.2 LIVESTOCK AND GRAZING ........................................................................................................... 99 7.3 PREDATOR CONTROL & LIVESTOCK PREDATION ............................................................................ 105 7.4 NOXIOUS WEEDS AND INVASIVE SPECIES ..................................................................................... 106 ii | P a g e Natural Resource Management Plan REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 110 APPENDIX A: ADDITIONAL MAPS ....................................................................................... 118 APPENDIX B: TABLES ......................................................................................................... 119 APPENDIX C: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS ................................................................. 137 iii | P a g e Natural Resource Management Plan ACRONYMS ACEC- Areas of Critical Environmental Concern APHIS – Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ARPA – Archeological Resources Protection Act AUM- Animal Unit Month BLM- Bureau of Land Management BMP-Best Management Practice BOR- Bureau of Reclamation CAA- 1970 Clean Air Act CAP-SSE-- Community Assistance Program – State Support Services CCA – Candidate Conservation Agreements CCAA – Candidate Conservation Agreements with Assurances CDC – Center for Disease Control CEQ- Council on Environmental Quality CLG – Certified Local Government CRP – Conservation Reserve Program CWA – Clean Water Act DEQ- Department of Environmental Quality DOD- Department of Defense EA- Environmental Assessment EIS- Environmental Impact Statement ENSO- El Niño-Southern Oscillation EPA- Environmental Protection Agency ERFO – Emergency Relief for Federally Owned Roads ESA- 1973 Endangered Species Act FAST – Fixing America’s Surface Transportation act iv | P a g e Natural Resource Management Plan FDQA – Federal Data Quality Act FHWA- Federal Highway Administration FLAP – Federal Lands Access Program FLMPA- 1976 Federal Land Management and Policy Act FLTP – Federal Lands Transportation Program FSA – Farm Service Agency FUDs – Formerly Used Defense Sites GHG- Greenhouse Gas GLO - General Lands Office GPC—Groundwater Pollution Control IMR – Intermountain Range IPCC- International Governmental Panel on Climate Change JCCLUP – Johnson County Comprehensive Land Use Plan JCCWP - Johnson County Community Wildfire Protection Plan LUP- Land Use Plan LWCF- Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1964 MOA - Memorandum of Agreement MOU - Memorandum of Understanding MUSY- 1960 Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act NAAQS – National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAO- North Atlantic Oscillation NEPA- 1973 National Environmental Policy Act NFHL – National Flood Hazard Layer NFIP – National Flood Insurance Program NFMA- 1976 National Forest Management Act v | P a g e Natural Resource Management Plan NFS – National Forest System NNDSS - National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System NPS- National Park Service NRCS – Natural Resource Conservation Service NRMP- Natural Resource Management Plan NSFLTP – Nationally Significant Federal Lands and Tribal Projects Program NSS – Native Species Status NWR – National Wildlife Refuge
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Army Post on the Northern Plains, 1865-1885
    The Army Post on the Northern Plains, 1865-1885 (Article begins on page 2 below.) This article is copyrighted by History Nebraska (formerly the Nebraska State Historical Society). You may download it for your personal use. For permission to re-use materials, or for photo ordering information, see: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/re-use-nshs-materials Learn more about Nebraska History (and search articles) here: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/nebraska-history-magazine History Nebraska members receive four issues of Nebraska History annually: https://history.nebraska.gov/get-involved/membership Full Citation: Ray H. Mattison, “The Army Post on the Northern Plains, 1865-1885,” Nebraska History 35 (1954): 17-43 Article Summary: Frontier garrisons played a significant role in the development of the West even though their military effectiveness has been questioned. The author describes daily life on the posts, which provided protection to the emigrants heading west and kept the roads open. Note: A list of military posts in the Northern Plains follows the article. Cataloging Information: Photographs / Images: map of Army posts in the Northern Plains states, 1860-1895; Fort Laramie c. 1884; Fort Totten, Dakota Territory, c. 1867 THE ARMY POST ON THE NORTHERN PLAINS, 1865-1885 BY RAY H. MATTISON HE opening of the Oregon Trail, together with the dis­ covery of gold in California and the cession of the TMexican Territory to the United States in 1848, re­ sulted in a great migration to the trans-Mississippi West. As a result, a new line of military posts was needed to guard the emigrant and supply trains as well as to furnish protection for the Overland Mail and the new settlements.1 The wiping out of Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Eriogonum Visheri A
    Eriogonum visheri A. Nelson (Visher’s buckwheat): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project December 18, 2006 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Cir E. Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Ladyman, J.A.R. (2006, December 18). Eriogonum visheri A. Nelson (Visher’s buckwheat): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/ projects/scp/assessments/eriogonumvisheri.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and help given by all the people and institutions listed in the reference section are gratefully acknowledged. I would also like to thank the North Dakota Parks and Recreation Department, in particular Christine Dirk, and the South Dakota Natural Heritage Program, in particular David Ode, for their generosity in making their records, reports, and photographs available. I thank the Montana Natural Heritage Program, particularly Martin Miller, Mark Gabel of the Black Hills University Herbarium, Robert Tatina of the Dakota Wesleyan University, Christine Niezgoda of the Field Museum of Natural History, Carrie Kiel Academy of Natural Sciences, Dave Dyer of the University of Montana Herbarium, Caleb Morse of the R.L. McGregor Herbarium, Robert Kaul of the C. E. Bessey Herbarium, John La Duke of the University of North Dakota Herbarium, Joe Washington of the Dakota National Grasslands, and Doug Sargent of the Buffalo Gap National Grasslands - Region 2, for the information they provided. I also appreciate the access to files and assistance given to me by Andrew Kratz, Region 2 USDA Forest Service, and Chuck Davis, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • EDL Peloux Bridge
    Johnson County Jim Gatchell Memorial Museum National Register of Historic Places Walking and Driving Tour The Johnson County Jim Gatchell Memorial Museum presents this driving tour for your enjoyment. Johnson County contains 25 National Register of Historic Places sites. This tour will be divided into three areas: Buffalo, southern Johnson County, and northern Johnson County. Learn why these sites are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Be advised that when you are driving the southern and northern Johnson County sections, you are traveling in rural areas. There are no services except in Buffalo, Sheridan, and Kaycee—be sure to pack a lunch and plenty of liquids. Begin at the Johnson County Jim Gatchell Memorial Museum, located at 100 Fort Street, Buffalo, Wyoming. BUFFALO HISTORICAL SITES Carnegie Public Library (Johnson County Jim Gatchell Memorial Museum) Built in 1909, this Andrew Carnegie Library was the original location of the Johnson County Library. Andrew Carnegie, a Gilded Age industrialist, believed that education had the power to lift people out of poverty. By the time he died in 1919, Carnegie had donated over $56 million to build 2,509 libraries. Costing $12,500, the building is “Neoclassical” in style, with levels of contrasting color native stone, a porch with two slender Norman-style columns, and an apse on the north side. When the library moved to its current location in the 1980s, the Johnson County Jim Gatchell Memorial Museum acquired the old library building and connected its two buildings with a link in 2006. Walk to the corner of Main Street and Fort Street where the Johnson County Courthouse is located.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plants for Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
    Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Plant Checklist DRAFT as of 29 November 2005 FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Present in Park Rare Native Field horsetail Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum Present in Park Unknown Native Scouring-rush Polypodiaceae (Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis Present in Park Uncommon Native Brittle bladderfern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Woodsia oregana Present in Park Uncommon Native Oregon woodsia Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Argyrochosma fendleri Present in Park Unknown Native Zigzag fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cheilanthes feei Present in Park Uncommon Native Slender lip fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cryptogramma acrostichoides Present in Park Unknown Native American rockbrake Selaginellaceae (Spikemoss Family) Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella densa Present in Park Rare Native Lesser spikemoss Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella weatherbiana Present in Park Unknown Native Weatherby's clubmoss CONIFERS Cupressaceae (Cypress family) Vascular Plant Pinales Cupressaceae Juniperus scopulorum Present in Park Unknown Native Rocky Mountain juniper Pinaceae (Pine Family) Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies concolor var. concolor Present in Park Rare Native White fir Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Present
    [Show full text]
  • Coefficients of Conservatism for the Vascular Flora of the Dakotas and Adjacent Grasslands
    (200) B565i no. 2001 -1 mt of the Interior al Survey c.1 Coefficients of Conservatism for the Vascular Flora of the Dakotas and Adjacent Grasslands Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD/ITR- 2001 -0001 ~USGS science for a changing world Cover art: Penstemon nitidus courtesy of Dorothy E. Mushet. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Coefficients of Conservatism for the Vascular Flora of the Dakotas and Adjacent Grasslands By The Northern Great Plains Floristic Quality Assessment Panel Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD/ITR- 2001 -0001 OCT 1 G 2.001 U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2001 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Cop ies of th is publication are available from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Spring­ field, Virginia 22161 (1 -800-553-6847 or 703-487 -4650). Copies also are available to registered users from the Defense Technical Information Center, Attn .: Help Desk, 8725 Kingman Road, Suite 0944, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6218 (1 -800 -225-3842 or 703 -767 - 9050). Suggested citation: The orthem Great Plain Floristic Quality Assessment Panel, 200 I, Coefficient of conservatism for the vascular flora of the Dakotas and adjacent grasslands: U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Divi ion, Lnformation and Technology Report USGS/ BRD/lTR- 200 1-0001, 32 p. Contents Page Ab tract ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Cedar Breaks National
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 ON THE COVER Peterson’s campion (Silene petersonii), Cedar Breaks National Monument, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 February 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer- reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3 Northeast Area Including Sheridan, Buffalo, Dayton, Gillette, and Newcastle
    SECTION 3 NORTHEAST AREA INCLUDING SHERIDAN, BUFFALO, DAYTON, GILLETTE, AND NEWCASTLE 184 wagons, a contingent of Pawnee scouts, nearly 500 cavalrymen, and the aging Jim Bridger as guide. His column was one of three comprising the Powder River Indian Expedition sent to secure the Bozeman and other emigrant trails leading to the Montana mining fields. During the Battle of Tongue River, Connor was able to inflict serious damage on the Arapahos, but an aggressive counter attack forced him to retreat back to the newly estab- lished Fort Connor (later renamed Reno) on the banks of the Powder River. There he received word that he had been reassigned to his old command in the District of Utah. The Powder River Expedition, one of the most comprehensive campaigns against the Plains Indians, never completely succeeded. Connor had planned a complex operation only to be defeated by bad weather, inhospitable ter- Section 3 rain, and hostile Indians. Long term effects of the Expedition proved detrimental to the inter- ests of the Powder River tribes. The Army, with the establishment of Fort Connor (Reno) increased public awareness of this area which Devils Tower near Sundance. in turn caused more emigrants to use the Bozeman Trail. This led to public demand for government protection of travelers on their way 1 Food, Lodging T Connor Battlefield State to Montana gold fields. Historic Site Ranchester In Ranchester Pop. 701, Elev. 3,775 Once the site of a bloody battle when General Named by English born senator, D.H. Hardin, Patrick E. Connor’s army attacked and destroyed Ranchester was the site of two significant battles Arapahoe Chief Black Bear’s settlement of 250 during the Plains Indian Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Karyotype Traits in Grindelia Squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal (Asteraceae), an Invasive Plant in Romania
    Truta et. al.·Silvae Genetica (2012) 61-4/5, 179-186 Karyotype traits in Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal (Asteraceae), an invasive plant in Romania By ELENA TRUTA1),*), GABRIELA VOCHITA1), ADRIAN OPREA2) and CULITA SIRBU3) (Received 3rd February 2012) Abstract Europe (Russia, the Ukraine, Republic of Moldova, Esto- The description of the karyotype features and idio- nia, Lithuania, Czech Republic, Belgium, Sweden, gram in Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal (Aster- Latvia, Ireland) (SIRBU and OPREA, 2008). Although the aceae), an invasive plant in Romania, are reported here species is most common in the lower elevations of plains for the first time. The diploid chromosome number is and foothills, it was met, too, at 3000 m altitude in Col- 2n = 2x = 12, in agreement with the data published for orado and New Mexico. In Northern Utah, it occurs in the other species of the genus. The karyomorphological Tony Grove Canyon (2000 m) in the Cache National For- data show that the complements of the studied geno- est, also on disturbed ground throughout the valleys and types have small chromosomes (mean chromosome – in the adjacent Wasatch Mountains at elevations of at length is ± SE = 2.56 ± 0.10 µm, and mean length of X – least 2200 m (MCDONOUGH, 1975; WALSH, 1993). Report- haploid complements is ± SE = 15.33 ± 0.69 µm, with a X ed for the first time in the flora of Romania in 1998 range of variability comprised between 12.87–17.51 µm). The karyotypes are made up of six pairs of metacentric (SIRBU and OPREA, 1998), G. squarrosa can be considered and submetacentric chromosomes, with an identical an invasive alien plant in this country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Using
    G. Summary of identification and Evaluation Methods Discuss the methods used in developing the multiple property listing. The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, using federal financial assistance, contracted with the Wyoming State Historic Preservation Office to conduct an intensive cultural resource inventory of the Bozeman Trail in Wyoming. This historic resource received priority because it passes through the Powder River Basin, an area heavily impacted by energy development. The study area for the inventory included the corridor paralleling and containing the trail as well as historic sites associated with the route. The object was to identify and inventory the trail's cultural resources and evaluate those resources for their eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The survey and inventory work will also assist in planning future mining and energy exploration in Converse, Campbell, Johnson and Sheridan Counties and for review and compliance activities of the Wyoming SHPO. |X I See continuation sheet H. Major Bibliographical References BOOKS Alter, J. Cecil. James Bridger: Trapper, Frontiersman, Scout and Guide. Ohio": Long's College Book Company, 1951. Baker, Lillian H. The History of St. Lukes Episcopal Church of Buffalo, Wyoming. Buffalo, Wyoming: privately printed, 1950. Bourke, John G. On the Border With Crook. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1981. Bradley, James F. March of the Montana Column. Norman: Univer­ sity of Oklahoma Press, 1981. See continuation sheet Primary location of additional documentation: H State historic preservation office I I Local government EH Other State agency dl University I I Federal agency D Other Specify repository: ___________ I. Form Prepared By name/title See Continuation Sheet organization Wyoming SHPO date February 9, 1989 street & number 2301 Central, Barrett Building telephone (307) 777-6311_____ city or town Cheyenne_________________ state Wyoming______ zip code 82002 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment
    Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1–274. Published 12 February 2015. ISSN 2153 733X ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST OF THE MISSOURI FLORA FOR FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT DOUGLAS LADD The Nature Conservancy 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis, Missouri 63144 [email protected] JUSTIN R. THOMAS Institute of Botanical Training, LLC 111 County Road 3260 Salem, Missouri 65560 [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated checklist of the 2,961 vascular taxa comprising the flora of Missouri is presented, with conservatism rankings for Floristic Quality Assessment. The list also provides standardized acronyms for each taxon and information on nativity, physiognomy, and wetness ratings. Annotated comments for selected taxa provide taxonomic, floristic, and ecological information, particularly for taxa not recognized in recent treatments of the Missouri flora. Synonymy crosswalks are provided for three references commonly used in Missouri. A discussion of the concept and application of Floristic Quality Assessment is presented. To accurately reflect ecological and taxonomic relationships, new combinations are validated for two distinct taxa, Dichanthelium ashei and D. werneri , and problems in application of infraspecific taxon names within Quercus shumardii are clarified. CONTENTS Introduction Species conservatism and floristic quality Application of Floristic Quality Assessment Checklist: Rationale and methods Nomenclature and taxonomic concepts Synonymy Acronyms Physiognomy, nativity, and wetness Summary of the Missouri flora Conclusion Annotated comments for checklist taxa Acknowledgements Literature Cited Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora Table 1. C values, physiognomy, and common names Table 2. Synonymy crosswalk Table 3. Wetness ratings and plant families INTRODUCTION This list was developed as part of a revised and expanded system for Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Arvicola Amphibius ) In
    Nina Østby DNA Metabarcoding Diet Analysis of Water Vole (Arvicola amphibius) in Northern Norway Master’s thesis in Natural Science with Teacher Education Supervisor: Bernt-Erik Sæther Co-supervisors: Henrik Pärn, Michael D. Martin Master’s thesis Master’s June 2019 NTNU Department of Biology Faculty of Natural Sciences of Natural Faculty Norwegian University of Science and Technology of Science University Norwegian Nina Østby DNA Metabarcoding Diet Analysis of Water Vole (Arvicola amphibius) in Northern Norway Master’s thesis in Natural Science with Teacher Education Supervisor: Bernt-Erik Sæther Co-supervisors: Henrik Pärn, Michael D. Martin June 2019 Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Natural Sciences Department of Biology Abstract Understanding what factors affect population dynamics is important in ecology, as it provides important knowledge for conservation purposes in a time where global climate change and habitat destruction and degradation threaten the earth’s biodiversity. The extreme population size fluctuations in rodent populations provide good opportunities for studying the multiple factors influencing population dynamics. Food abundance and quality may be a factor contributing to the extreme population cycles seen in many rodents. For investigating the impact of food abundance and quality on a population’s state, it is necessary to know the diet of the focal species. In this study, the water vole (Arvicola amphibius) diet was explored using DNA metabarcoding on stool samples collected from four islands off the Helgeland coast in northern Norway. The diet was dominated by Poaceae (57% on average of identified plant families per sample), but with large individual variation. Rosaceae was the second most abundant plant family in the diet (14%) with especially high proportions on the smaller islands sampled.
    [Show full text]