DOCSLIB.ORG

Nonautonomous Dynamical Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Mathematical Surveys and Monographs Volume 176 Nonautonomous Dynamical Systems Peter E. Kloeden Martin Rasmussen American Mathematical Society http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/surv/176 Nonautonomous Dynamical Systems Mathematical Surveys and Monographs Volume 176 Nonautonomous Dynamical Systems Peter E. Kloeden Martin Rasmussen American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Ralph L. Cohen, Chair MichaelA.Singer Jordan S. Ellenberg Benjamin Sudakov MichaelI.Weinstein 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 37B55, 37C60, 37H05, 37B25, 37C75, 37D10, 37G35. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/surv-176 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kloeden, Peter E. Nonautonomous dynamical systems / Peter E. Kloeden, Martin Rasmussen. p. cm. — (Mathematical surveys and monographs ; v. 176) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8218-6871-3 (alk. paper) 1. Dynamics. 2. Ergodic theory. 3. Stability. I. Rasmussen, Martin, 1975– II. Title. QA845.K56 2011 515.392—dc23 2011020550 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy a chapter for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society. Requests for such permission should be addressed to the Acquisitions Department, American Mathematical Society, 201 Charles Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02904-2294 USA. Requests can also be made by e-mail to [email protected]. c 2011 by the American Mathematical Society. All rights reserved. The American Mathematical Society retains all rights except those granted to the United States Government. Printed in the United States of America. ∞ The paper used in this book is acid-free and falls within the guidelines established to ensure permanence and durability. Visit the AMS home page at http://www.ams.org/ 10987654321 161514131211 Contents Preface vii Chapter 1. Autonomous dynamical systems 1 1. Introduction 1 2. Local asymptotic behavior 4 3. Global asymptotic behavior 12 4. Dependence on parameters 17 Chapter 2. Nonautonomous dynamical systems 23 1. Processes formulation 23 2. Skew product flow formulation 26 3. Entire solutions and invariant sets 31 Chapter 3. Attractors 37 1. Attractors of processes 38 2. Attractors of skew product flows 41 3. Existence of pullback attractors 44 4. Relationship between nonautonomous attractors 52 5. Upper semi-continuous dependence on parameters 55 6. Parametrically inflated pullback attractors 57 7. Pullback attractors with continuous fibers 60 8. Local attractors and repellers 62 Chapter 4. Morse decompositions 69 1. Attractor-repeller pairs 69 2. Morse decompositions 72 3. The one-dimensional case 75 Chapter5. Linearsystems 79 1. Exponential dichotomy 79 2. Dichotomy spectrum 82 3. Lyapunov spectrum 87 4. Morse decompositions 89 Chapter 6. Invariant manifolds 105 1. Global invariant manifolds 105 2. Local invariant manifolds 112 3. Hierarchies of invariant manifolds 114 4. Taylor approximation 116 5. Reduction principle 123 v vi CONTENTS Chapter 7. Lyapunov functions 129 1. Lyapunov functions for solutions 129 2. Lyapunov functions for autonomous attractors 132 3. Lyapunov functions for pullback attractors 135 4. Lyapunov functions for Morse decompositions 143 Chapter 8. Bifurcations 147 1. Nonautonomous Bernoulli equations 147 2. One-dimensional bifurcation patterns 149 3. Higher-dimensional Bernoulli-like equations 157 4. Further developments 163 Chapter 9. Set-valued nonautonomous dynamical systems 169 1. Set-valued processes 170 2. Set-valued skew product flows 173 3. Backward extension of autonomous semi-dynamical systems 175 4. Proof of existence of nonautonomous invariant sets 178 Chapter 10. Nonautonomous semi-dynamical systems 185 1. Attractors of skew product semi-flows 185 2. The twisted horseshoe mapping 189 Chapter 11. Approximation and perturbation of attractors 191 1. Nonautonomous perturbations of an autonomous system 191 2. Numerical approximation of uniform attractors 193 3. Perturbation of the driving system 197 Chapter 12. Infinite-dimensional systems 205 1. Squeezing and flattening properties: the autonomous case 205 2. Pullback asymptotic compactness 207 Chapter 13. Switching and control systems 213 1. Switching systems 213 2. Affine control systems 222 Chapter 14. Random dynamical systems 227 1. Random attractors 228 2. The Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process 229 3. Random attractors for stochastic differential equations 231 Chapter 15. Synchronization 235 1. Deterministic nonautonomous systems 235 2. Synchronization of systems with additive noise 242 3. Synchronization of systems with linear noise 247 Appendix 251 Bibliography 253 Index 263 Preface Dynamical systems theory has been a very active area of research in mathematics and cognate fields for many years, but most of the results that have been obtained focus almost exclusively on autonomous dynamical systems. There have, of course, been investigations of nonautonomous differential equations, that is with time- dependent vector fields, during this time, but it is only in the recent decade that a theory of nonautonomous dynamical systems has emerged synergizing parallel developments on time-dependent differential equations, control systems and ran- dom dynamical systems. There are now abstract formulations of nonautonomous dynamical systems as two-parameter semi-groups or processes and as skew product flows as well as new concepts of nonautonomous attractors, in particular, pullback attractors. This development is presented in this book for graduate students and others with a general background in dynamical systems and differential equations. The choice of topics and applications covered, especially in the later chapters, reflects the interests of the authors, but nevertheless provides a broad overview of important developments on the subject. There are fifteen chapters and an appendix. The first chapter briefly reviews the theory of autonomous dynamical systems from the perspective of what is needed later rather than attempting to be comprehensive in itself. The process and skew product flow formalism of nonautonomous dynamical systems are introduced in the second chapter and the various concepts of nonautonomous attractors are pre- sented and compared in the third chapter. These two chapters are essential reading for everything that is to follow. The remaining chapters can be read more or less independently of each other, except the fourth, fifth and sixth chapters on Morse de- compositions, linear systems and invariant manifolds, respectively, which are best read as a sequential block. Lyapunov functions are considered in chapter seven and bifurcations in nonautonomous systems in chapter eight. Generalizations to set-valued nonautonomous dynamical systems and nonautonomous semi-dynamical systems are treated in chapters nine and ten, while the effects of perturbations and discretization are discussed in chapter eleven. Up to here the state space is either Rd or a general complete metric space, but in chapter twelve issues of explicit relevance to infinite-dimensional state spaces are considered. Chapter thirteen applies previ- ous results to switching and affine control systems interpreted as nonautonomous dynamical systems, while chapter fourteen introduces readers to some of the differ- ences arising in random dynamical systems due to their measure-theoretic rather than topological characteristics. The previous deterministic and random results are then applied to the synchronization of dissipative systems in chapter fifteen. vii viii PREFACE Finally, various background definitions and results needed within the text are given in the appendix. Readers who are interested in the dynamical behavior of nonautonomous partial differential equations and evolution equations are advised to refer to the mono- graphs of Carvalho, Langa & Robinson [35]andChepyzhov & Vishik [43] in conjunction with this book. Acknowledgements. We are indebted to numerous colleagues for their help- ful discussions during the preparation of this book. In particular, we thank Tom´as Caraballo, Alexandre Carvalho, David Cheban, Hans Crauel, Jinquiao Duan, Mes- soud Effendiev, Barnabas Garay, Peter Giesl, Arnulf Jentzen, Victor Kozyakin, Jeroen Lamb, Jos´e Langa, Li Desheng, Thomas Lorenz, Pedro Mar´ın-Rubio, Chris- tian P¨otzsche, Jos´e Real, Janosch Rieger, James Robinson, Bj¨orn Schmalfuß, Ste- fanie Sonner, Aneta Stefanovska, Meihua Yang for carefully reading parts of the book and for their suggestions for improvements, as well as Fritz Colonius and Christoph Kawan for advice on control systems as skew product flows. In addi- tion, we thank Alexandre Carvalho, Jos´e Langa and James Robinson for keeping us informed about developments with preparation of their book [35] entitled Attrac- tors of Infinite Dimensional Nonautonomous Dynamical Systems and their useful comments about our manuscript. We also thank Sofie van Geene for providing Fig- ure 2.1 and Philipp Storck for providing Figures 3.1 and 3.2 in the book. Finally, we would like to thank both Karin and Eva-Maria for their encouragement during thetimewewrotethisbook. Peter Kloeden thanks the Departamento de Ecuaciones Diferenciales y An´alisis
Recommended publications
  • Category Theory for Autonomous and Networked Dynamical Systems

    Category Theory for Autonomous and Networked Dynamical Systems

    Discussion Category Theory for Autonomous and Networked Dynamical Systems Jean-Charles Delvenne Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM) and Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; [email protected] Received: 7 February 2019; Accepted: 18 March 2019; Published: 20 March 2019 Abstract: In this discussion paper we argue that category theory may play a useful role in formulating, and perhaps proving, results in ergodic theory, topogical dynamics and open systems theory (control theory). As examples, we show how to characterize Kolmogorov–Sinai, Shannon entropy and topological entropy as the unique functors to the nonnegative reals satisfying some natural conditions. We also provide a purely categorical proof of the existence of the maximal equicontinuous factor in topological dynamics. We then show how to define open systems (that can interact with their environment), interconnect them, and define control problems for them in a unified way. Keywords: ergodic theory; topological dynamics; control theory 1. Introduction The theory of autonomous dynamical systems has developed in different flavours according to which structure is assumed on the state space—with topological dynamics (studying continuous maps on topological spaces) and ergodic theory (studying probability measures invariant under the map) as two prominent examples. These theories have followed parallel tracks and built multiple bridges. For example, both have grown successful tools from the interaction with information theory soon after its emergence, around the key invariants, namely the topological entropy and metric entropy, which are themselves linked by a variational theorem. The situation is more complex and heterogeneous in the field of what we here call open dynamical systems, or controlled dynamical systems.
  • Topological Entropy and Distributional Chaos in Hereditary Shifts with Applications to Spacing Shifts and Beta Shifts

    Topological Entropy and Distributional Chaos in Hereditary Shifts with Applications to Spacing Shifts and Beta Shifts

    DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS doi:10.3934/dcds.2013.33.2451 DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS Volume 33, Number 6, June 2013 pp. 2451{2467 TOPOLOGICAL ENTROPY AND DISTRIBUTIONAL CHAOS IN HEREDITARY SHIFTS WITH APPLICATIONS TO SPACING SHIFTS AND BETA SHIFTS Dedicated to the memory of Professor Andrzej Pelczar (1937-2010). Dominik Kwietniak Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Jagiellonian University in Krak´ow ul.Lojasiewicza 6, 30-348 Krak´ow,Poland (Communicated by Llu´ısAlsed`a) Abstract. Positive topological entropy and distributional chaos are charac- terized for hereditary shifts. A hereditary shift has positive topological entropy if and only if it is DC2-chaotic (or equivalently, DC3-chaotic) if and only if it is not uniquely ergodic. A hereditary shift is DC1-chaotic if and only if it is not proximal (has more than one minimal set). As every spacing shift and every beta shift is hereditary the results apply to those classes of shifts. Two open problems on topological entropy and distributional chaos of spacing shifts from an article of Banks et al. are solved thanks to this characterization. Moreover, it is shown that a spacing shift ΩP has positive topological entropy if and only if N n P is a set of Poincar´erecurrence. Using a result of Kˇr´ıˇzan example of a proximal spacing shift with positive entropy is constructed. Connections between spacing shifts and difference sets are revealed and the methods of this paper are used to obtain new proofs of some results on difference sets. 1. Introduction. A hereditary shift is a (one-sided) subshift X such that x 2 X and y ≤ x (coordinate-wise) imply y 2 X.
  • Topological Dynamics of Ordinary Differential Equations and Kurzweil Equations*

    Topological Dynamics of Ordinary Differential Equations and Kurzweil Equations*

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector JOURNAL OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 23, 224-243 (1977) Topological Dynamics of Ordinary Differential Equations and Kurzweil Equations* ZVI ARTSTEIN Lefschetz Center for Dynamical Systems, Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 Received March 25, 1975; revised September 4, 1975 1. INTRODUCTION A basic construction in applying topological dynamics to nonautonomous ordinary differential equations f =f(x, s) is to consider limit points (when 1 t 1 + co) of the translatesf, , wheref,(x, s) = f(~, t + s). A limit point defines a limiting equation and there is a tight relation- ship between the behavior of solutions of the original equation and of the limiting equations (see [l&13]). I n order to carry out this construction one has to specify the meaning of the convergence of ft , and this convergence has to have certain properties which we shall discuss later. In this paper we shall encounter a phenomenon which seems to be new in the context of applications of topological dynamics. The limiting equations will not be ordinary differential equations. We shall work under assumptions that do not guarantee that the space of ordinary equations is complete and we shall have to consider a completion of the space. Almost two decades ago Kurzweil [3] introduced what he called generalized ordinary differential equations and what we call Kurzweil equations. We shall see that if we embed our ordinary equations in a space of Kurzweil equations we get a complete and compact space, and the techniques of topological dynamics can be applied.
  • Solution Bounds, Stability and Attractors' Estimates of Some Nonlinear Time-Varying Systems

    Solution Bounds, Stability and Attractors' Estimates of Some Nonlinear Time-Varying Systems

    1 Solution Bounds, Stability and Attractors’ Estimates of Some Nonlinear Time-Varying Systems Mark A. Pinsky and Steve Koblik Abstract. Estimation of solution norms and stability for time-dependent nonlinear systems is ubiquitous in numerous applied and control problems. Yet, practically valuable results are rare in this area. This paper develops a novel approach, which bounds the solution norms, derives the corresponding stability criteria, and estimates the trapping/stability regions for a broad class of the corresponding systems. Our inferences rest on deriving a scalar differential inequality for the norms of solutions to the initial systems. Utility of the Lipschitz inequality linearizes the associated auxiliary differential equation and yields both the upper bounds for the norms of solutions and the relevant stability criteria. To refine these inferences, we introduce a nonlinear extension of the Lipschitz inequality, which improves the developed bounds and estimates the stability basins and trapping regions for the corresponding systems. Finally, we conform the theoretical results in representative simulations. Key Words. Comparison principle, Lipschitz condition, stability criteria, trapping/stability regions, solution bounds AMS subject classification. 34A34, 34C11, 34C29, 34C41, 34D08, 34D10, 34D20, 34D45 1. INTRODUCTION. We are going to study a system defined by the equation n (1) xAtxftxFttt , , [0 , ), x , ft ,0 0 where matrix A nn and functions ft:[ , ) nn and F : n are continuous and bounded, and At is also continuously differentiable. It is assumed that the solution, x t, x0 , to the initial value problem, x t0, x 0 x 0 , is uniquely defined for tt0 . Note that the pertained conditions can be found, e.g., in [1] and [2].
  • Strange Attractors and Classical Stability Theory

    Strange Attractors and Classical Stability Theory

    Nonlinear Dynamics and Systems Theory, 8 (1) (2008) 49–96 Strange Attractors and Classical Stability Theory G. Leonov ∗ St. Petersburg State University Universitetskaya av., 28, Petrodvorets, 198504 St.Petersburg, Russia Received: November 16, 2006; Revised: December 15, 2007 Abstract: Definitions of global attractor, B-attractor and weak attractor are introduced. Relationships between Lyapunov stability, Poincare stability and Zhukovsky stability are considered. Perron effects are discussed. Stability and instability criteria by the first approximation are obtained. Lyapunov direct method in dimension theory is introduced. For the Lorenz system necessary and sufficient conditions of existence of homoclinic trajectories are obtained. Keywords: Attractor, instability, Lyapunov exponent, stability, Poincar´esection, Hausdorff dimension, Lorenz system, homoclinic bifurcation. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 34C28, 34D45, 34D20. 1 Introduction In almost any solid survey or book on chaotic dynamics, one encounters notions from classical stability theory such as Lyapunov exponent and characteristic exponent. But the effect of sign inversion in the characteristic exponent during linearization is seldom mentioned. This effect was discovered by Oscar Perron [1], an outstanding German math- ematician. The present survey sets forth Perron’s results and their further development, see [2]–[4]. It is shown that Perron effects may occur on the boundaries of a flow of solutions that is stable by the first approximation. Inside the flow, stability is completely determined by the negativeness of the characteristic exponents of linearized systems. It is often said that the defining property of strange attractors is the sensitivity of their trajectories with respect to the initial data. But how is this property connected with the classical notions of instability? For continuous systems, it was necessary to remember the almost forgotten notion of Zhukovsky instability.
  • Chapter 8 Stability Theory

    Chapter 8 Stability Theory

    Chapter 8 Stability theory We discuss properties of solutions of a first order two dimensional system, and stability theory for a special class of linear systems. We denote the independent variable by ‘t’ in place of ‘x’, and x,y denote dependent variables. Let I ⊆ R be an interval, and Ω ⊆ R2 be a domain. Let us consider the system dx = F (t, x, y), dt (8.1) dy = G(t, x, y), dt where the functions are defined on I × Ω, and are locally Lipschitz w.r.t. variable (x, y) ∈ Ω. Definition 8.1 (Autonomous system) A system of ODE having the form (8.1) is called an autonomous system if the functions F (t, x, y) and G(t, x, y) are constant w.r.t. variable t. That is, dx = F (x, y), dt (8.2) dy = G(x, y), dt Definition 8.2 A point (x0, y0) ∈ Ω is said to be a critical point of the autonomous system (8.2) if F (x0, y0) = G(x0, y0) = 0. (8.3) A critical point is also called an equilibrium point, a rest point. Definition 8.3 Let (x(t), y(t)) be a solution of a two-dimensional (planar) autonomous system (8.2). The trace of (x(t), y(t)) as t varies is a curve in the plane. This curve is called trajectory. Remark 8.4 (On solutions of autonomous systems) (i) Two different solutions may represent the same trajectory. For, (1) If (x1(t), y1(t)) defined on an interval J is a solution of the autonomous system (8.2), then the pair of functions (x2(t), y2(t)) defined by (x2(t), y2(t)) := (x1(t − s), y1(t − s)), for t ∈ s + J (8.4) is a solution on interval s + J, for every arbitrary but fixed s ∈ R.
  • Robot Dynamics and Control Lecture 8: Basic Lyapunov Stability Theory

    Robot Dynamics and Control Lecture 8: Basic Lyapunov Stability Theory

    MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control Lecture 8: Basic Lyapunov Stability Theory Reading: SHV Appendix Mechanical Engineering Hanz Richter, PhD MCE503 – p.1/17 Stability in the sense of Lyapunov A dynamic system x˙ = f(x) is Lyapunov stable or internally stable about an equilibrium point xeq if state trajectories are confined to a bounded region whenever the initial condition x0 is chosen sufficiently close to xeq. Mathematically, given R> 0 there always exists r > 0 so that if ||x0 − xeq|| <r, then ||x(t) − xeq|| <R for all t> 0. As seen in the figure R defines a desired confinement region, while r defines the neighborhood of xeq where x0 must belong so that x(t) does not exit the confinement region. R r xeq x0 x(t) MCE503 – p.2/17 Stability in the sense of Lyapunov... Note: Lyapunov stability does not require ||x(t)|| to converge to ||xeq||. The stronger definition of asymptotic stability requires that ||x(t)|| → ||xeq|| as t →∞. Input-Output stability (BIBO) does not imply Lyapunov stability. The system can be BIBO stable but have unbounded states that do not cause the output to be unbounded (for example take x1(t) →∞, with y = Cx = [01]x). The definition is difficult to use to test the stability of a given system. Instead, we use Lyapunov’s stability theorem, also called Lyapunov’s direct method. This theorem is only a sufficient condition, however. When the test fails, the results are inconclusive. It’s still the best tool available to evaluate and ensure the stability of nonlinear systems.
  • Groups and Topological Dynamics Volodymyr Nekrashevych

    Groups and Topological Dynamics Volodymyr Nekrashevych

    Groups and topological dynamics Volodymyr Nekrashevych E-mail address: [email protected] 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary ... ; Secondary ... Key words and phrases. .... The author ... Abstract. ... Contents Chapter 1. Dynamical systems 1 x1.1. Introduction by examples 1 x1.2. Subshifts 21 x1.3. Minimal Cantor systems 36 x1.4. Hyperbolic dynamics 74 x1.5. Holomorphic dynamics 103 Exercises 111 Chapter 2. Group actions 117 x2.1. Structure of orbits 117 x2.2. Localizable actions and Rubin's theorem 136 x2.3. Automata 149 x2.4. Groups acting on rooted trees 163 Exercises 193 Chapter 3. Groupoids 201 x3.1. Basic definitions 201 x3.2. Actions and correspondences 214 x3.3. Fundamental groups 233 x3.4. Orbispaces and complexes of groups 238 x3.5. Compactly generated groupoids 243 x3.6. Hyperbolic groupoids 252 Exercises 252 iii iv Contents Chapter 4. Iterated monodromy groups 255 x4.1. Iterated monodromy groups of self-coverings 255 x4.2. Self-similar groups 265 x4.3. General case 274 x4.4. Expanding maps and contracting groups 291 x4.5. Thurston maps and related structures 311 x4.6. Iterations of polynomials 333 x4.7. Functoriality 334 Exercises 340 Chapter 5. Groups from groupoids 345 x5.1. Full groups 345 x5.2. AF groupoids 364 x5.3. Homology of totally disconnected ´etalegroupoids 371 x5.4. Almost finite groupoids 378 x5.5. Bounded type 380 x5.6. Torsion groups 395 x5.7. Fragmentations of dihedral groups 401 x5.8. Purely infinite groupoids 423 Exercises 424 Chapter 6. Growth and amenability 427 x6.1. Growth of groups 427 x6.2.
  • Analysis of ODE Models

    Analysis of ODE Models

    Analysis of ODE Models P. Howard Fall 2009 Contents 1 Overview 1 2 Stability 2 2.1 ThePhasePlane ................................. 5 2.2 Linearization ................................... 10 2.3 LinearizationandtheJacobianMatrix . ...... 15 2.4 BriefReviewofLinearAlgebra . ... 20 2.5 Solving Linear First-Order Systems . ...... 23 2.6 StabilityandEigenvalues . ... 28 2.7 LinearStabilitywithMATLAB . .. 35 2.8 Application to Maximum Sustainable Yield . ....... 37 2.9 Nonlinear Stability Theorems . .... 38 2.10 Solving ODE Systems with matrix exponentiation . ......... 40 2.11 Taylor’s Formula for Functions of Multiple Variables . ............ 44 2.12 ProofofPart1ofPoincare–Perron . ..... 45 3 Uniqueness Theory 47 4 Existence Theory 50 1 Overview In these notes we consider the three main aspects of ODE analysis: (1) existence theory, (2) uniqueness theory, and (3) stability theory. In our study of existence theory we ask the most basic question: are the ODE we write down guaranteed to have solutions? Since in practice we solve most ODE numerically, it’s possible that if there is no theoretical solution the numerical values given will have no genuine relation with the physical system we want to analyze. In our study of uniqueness theory we assume a solution exists and ask if it is the only possible solution. If we are solving an ODE numerically we will only get one solution, and if solutions are not unique it may not be the physically interesting solution. While it’s standard in advanced ODE courses to study existence and uniqueness first and stability 1 later, we will start with stability in these note, because it’s the one most directly linked with the modeling process.
  • Dynamical Systems and Ergodic Theory

    Dynamical Systems and Ergodic Theory

    MATH36206 - MATHM6206 Dynamical Systems and Ergodic Theory Teaching Block 1, 2017/18 Lecturer: Prof. Alexander Gorodnik PART III: LECTURES 16{30 course web site: people.maths.bris.ac.uk/∼mazag/ds17/ Copyright c University of Bristol 2010 & 2016. This material is copyright of the University. It is provided exclusively for educational purposes at the University and is to be downloaded or copied for your private study only. Chapter 3 Ergodic Theory In this last part of our course we will introduce the main ideas and concepts in ergodic theory. Ergodic theory is a branch of dynamical systems which has strict connections with analysis and probability theory. The discrete dynamical systems f : X X studied in topological dynamics were continuous maps f on metric spaces X (or more in general, topological→ spaces). In ergodic theory, f : X X will be a measure-preserving map on a measure space X (we will see the corresponding definitions below).→ While the focus in topological dynamics was to understand the qualitative behavior (for example, periodicity or density) of all orbits, in ergodic theory we will not study all orbits, but only typical1 orbits, but will investigate more quantitative dynamical properties, as frequencies of visits, equidistribution and mixing. An example of a basic question studied in ergodic theory is the following. Let A X be a subset of O+ ⊂ the space X. Consider the visits of an orbit f (x) to the set A. If we consider a finite orbit segment x, f(x),...,f n−1(x) , the number of visits to A up to time n is given by { } Card 0 k n 1, f k(x) A .
  • Topological Dynamics: a Survey

    Topological Dynamics: a Survey

    Topological Dynamics: A Survey Ethan Akin Mathematics Department The City College 137 Street and Convent Avenue New York City, NY 10031, USA September, 2007 Topological Dynamics: Outline of Article Glossary I Introduction and History II Dynamic Relations, Invariant Sets and Lyapunov Functions III Attractors and Chain Recurrence IV Chaos and Equicontinuity V Minimality and Multiple Recurrence VI Additional Reading VII Bibliography 1 Glossary Attractor An invariant subset for a dynamical system such that points su±ciently close to the set remain close and approach the set in the limit as time tends to in¯nity. Dynamical System A model for the motion of a system through time. The time variable is either discrete, varying over the integers, or continuous, taking real values. Our systems are deterministic, rather than stochastic, so the the future states of the system are functions of the past. Equilibrium An equilibrium, or a ¯xed point, is a point which remains at rest for all time. Invariant Set A subset is invariant if the orbit of each point of the set remains in the set at all times, both positive and negative. The set is + invariant, or forward invariant, if the forward orbit of each such point remains in the set. Lyapunov Function A continuous, real-valued function on the state space is a Lyapunov function when it is non-decreasing on each orbit as time moves forward. Orbit The orbit of an initial position is the set of points through which the system moves as time varies positively and negatively through all values. The forward orbit is the subset associated with positive times.
  • THE DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS APPROACH to DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS INTRODUCTION the Mathematical Subject We Call Dynamical Systems Was

    THE DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS APPROACH to DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS INTRODUCTION the Mathematical Subject We Call Dynamical Systems Was

    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 11, Number 1, July 1984 THE DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS APPROACH TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS BY MORRIS W. HIRSCH1 This harmony that human intelligence believes it discovers in nature —does it exist apart from that intelligence? No, without doubt, a reality completely independent of the spirit which conceives it, sees it or feels it, is an impossibility. A world so exterior as that, even if it existed, would be forever inaccessible to us. But what we call objective reality is, in the last analysis, that which is common to several thinking beings, and could be common to all; this common part, we will see, can be nothing but the harmony expressed by mathematical laws. H. Poincaré, La valeur de la science, p. 9 ... ignorance of the roots of the subject has its price—no one denies that modern formulations are clear, elegant and precise; it's just that it's impossible to comprehend how any one ever thought of them. M. Spivak, A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry INTRODUCTION The mathematical subject we call dynamical systems was fathered by Poin­ caré, developed sturdily under Birkhoff, and has enjoyed a vigorous new growth for the last twenty years. As I try to show in Chapter I, it is interesting to look at this mathematical development as the natural outcome of a much broader theme which is as old as science itself: the universe is a sytem which changes in time. Every mathematician has a particular way of thinking about mathematics, but rarely makes it explicit.