DOCSLIB.ORG

Arnold: Swimming Against the Tide / Boris Khesin, Serge Tabachnikov, Editors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arnold: Swimming Against the Tide / Boris Khesin, Serge Tabachnikov, Editors ARNOLD: Real Analysis A Comprehensive Course in Analysis, Part 1 Barry Simon Boris A. Khesin Serge L. Tabachnikov Editors http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/mbk/086 ARNOLD: AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Photograph courtesy of Svetlana Tretyakova Photograph courtesy of Svetlana Vladimir Igorevich Arnold June 12, 1937–June 3, 2010 ARNOLD: Boris A. Khesin Serge L. Tabachnikov Editors AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Providence, Rhode Island Translation of Chapter 7 “About Vladimir Abramovich Rokhlin” and Chapter 21 “Several Thoughts About Arnold” provided by Valentina Altman. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 01A65; Secondary 01A70, 01A75. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/mbk-86 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Arnold: swimming against the tide / Boris Khesin, Serge Tabachnikov, editors. pages cm. ISBN 978-1-4704-1699-7 (alk. paper) 1. Arnold, V. I. (Vladimir Igorevich), 1937–2010. 2. Mathematicians–Russia–Biography. 3. Mathematicians–Soviet Union–Biography. 4. Mathematical analysis. 5. Differential equations. I. Khesin, Boris A. II. Tabachnikov, Serge. QA8.6.A76 2014 510.92–dc23 2014021165 [B] Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy select pages for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society. Permissions to reuse portions of AMS publication content are now being handled by Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. For more information, please visit: http://www.ams.org/rightslink. Translation rights and licensed reprint requests should be sent to [email protected]. Excluded from these provisions is material for which the author holds copyright. In such cases, requests for permission to reuse or reprint material should be addressed directly to the author(s). Copyright ownership is indicated on the copyright page, or on the lower right-hand corner of the first page of each article within proceedings volumes. c 2014 by the American Mathematical Society. All rights reserved. The American Mathematical Society retains all rights except those granted to the United States Government. Printed in the United States of America. ∞ The paper used in this book is acid-free and falls within the guidelines established to ensure permanence and durability. Visit the AMS home page at http://www.ams.org/ 10987654321 191817161514 Epigraph Development of mathematics resembles a fast revolution of a wheel: sprinkles of water are flying in all directions. Fashion – it is the stream that leaves the main trajectory in the tan- gential direction. These streams of epigone works attract most attention, and they constitute the main mass, but they inevitably disappear after a while because they parted with the wheel. To remain on the wheel, one must apply the effort in the direction perpendicular to the main stream. —V. I. Arnold, translated from “Arnold in His Own Words,” an interview with the mathematician originally published in Kvant Magazine, 1990 and republished in the Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 2012. v Contents Epigraph v Preface ix Permissions and Acknowledgments xiii Part 1. By Arnold Chapter 1. Arnold in His Own Words V. I. Arnold 3 Chapter 2. From Hilbert’s Superposition Problem to Dynamical Systems V. I. Arnold 11 Chapter 3. Recollections Jurgen¨ Moser 31 Chapter 4. Polymathematics: Is Mathematics a Single Science or aSetofArts? V. I. Arnold 35 Chapter 5. A Mathematical Trivium V. I. Arnold 47 Chapter 6. Comments on “A Mathematical Trivium” Boris Khesin and Serge Tabachnikov 57 Chapter 7. About Vladimir Abramovich Rokhlin V. I. Arnold 67 Photographs of V. I. Arnold 1940s–1970s 79 1980s–1990s 87 The 2000s 99 Part 2. About Arnold Chapter 8. To Whom It May Concern Alexander Givental 113 vii viii CONTENTS Chapter 9. Remembering Vladimir Arnold: Early Years Yakov Sinai 123 Chapter 10. Vladimir I. Arnold Steve Smale 127 Chapter 11. Memories of Vladimir Arnold Michael Berry 129 Chapter 12. Dima Arnold in My Life Dmitry Fuchs 133 Chapter 13. V. I. Arnold, As I Have Seen Him Yulij Ilyashenko 141 Chapter 14. My Encounters with Vladimir Igorevich Arnold Yakov Eliashberg 147 Chapter 15. On V. I. Arnold and Hydrodynamics Boris Khesin 151 Chapter 16. Arnold’s Seminar, First Years Askold Khovanskii and Alexander Varchenko 157 Chapter 17. Topology in Arnold’s Work Victor Vassiliev 165 Chapter 18. Arnold and Symplectic Geometry Helmut Hofer 173 Chapter 19. Some Recollections of Vladimir Igorevich Mikhail Sevryuk 179 Chapter 20. Remembering V. I. Arnold Leonid Polterovich 183 Chapter 21. Several Thoughts about Arnold A. Vershik 187 Chapter 22. Vladimir Igorevich Arnold: A View from the Rear Bench Sergei Yakovenko 197 Preface Vladimir Igorevich Arnold is one of the most influential mathematicians of our era. Arnold launched several mathematical domains (such as modern geometric mechanics, symplectic topology, and topological fluid dynamics) and contributed, in a fundamental way, to the foundations and methods in many subjects, from ordinary differential equations and celestial mechanics to singularity theory and real algebraic geometry. Even a quick look at a (certainly incomplete) list of notions and results named after Arnold is telling: • KAM (Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser) theory • The Arnold conjectures in symplectic topology • The Hilbert–Arnold problem for the number of zeros of abelian integrals • Arnold’s inequality, comparison, and complexification method in real al- gebraic geometry • Arnold–Kolmogorov solution of Hilbert’s 13th problem • Arnold’s spectral sequence in singularity theory • Arnold diffusion • The Euler–Poincar´e–Arnold equations for geodesics on Lie groups • Arnold’s stability criterion in hydrodynamics • ABC (Arnold–Beltrami–Childress) flows in fluid dynamics • Arnold–Korkina dynamo • Arnold’s cat map • The Liouville–Arnold theorem in integrable systems • Arnold’s continued fractions • Arnold’s interpretation of the Maslov index • Arnold’s relation in cohomology of braid groups • Arnold tongues in bifurcation theory • The Jordan–Arnold normal forms for families of matrices • Arnold’s invariants of plane curves Arnold wrote several hundreds of papers, and many books, including 10 univer- sity textbooks. He is known for his lucid writing style which combines mathematical rigor with physical and geometric intuition. Arnold’s books Ordinary Differential Equations and Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics have become math- ematical bestsellers and integral parts of the mathematical education throughout the world. Here is a brief biography and a list of distinctions of V. I. Arnold.1 V. I. Arnold was born on June 12, 1937, in Odessa, USSR. The family lived in Moscow, and Arnold graduated from the Moscow school #59. Later in life, on 1Adapted from Arnold’s own CV, the Preface to his “Collected Works”, Springer, 2009, and the website of the MCCME. ix xPREFACE numerous occasions, he warmly recalled his mathematics teacher Ivan Vassilievich Morozkin. From 1954–1959, he was a student at the Department of Mechanics and Mathematics of the Moscow State University. His M.Sc. diploma work was entitled “On mappings of a circle to itself.” The degree of a “candidate of physical-mathematical sciences,” an analogue of the Ph.D. degree in the West, was conferred on him in 1961 by the Keldysh Applied Mathematics Institute, Moscow; his thesis advisor was A.N. Kolmogorov. Arnold’s thesis described the representation of continuous functions of three variables as superpositions of continuous functions of two variables, thus completing the solution of Hilbert’s 13th problem. Arnold obtained this result back in 1957, being a third year undergraduate student (by then, A.N. Kolmogorov had shown that continuous functions of more variables could be represented as superpositions of continuous functions of only three variables). The degree of “doctor of physical-mathematical sciences,” an analogue of the Habilitation degree, was awarded to him in 1963 by the Keldysh Applied Mathe- matics Institute, Moscow. (The same Institute where Arnold completed his thesis on the stability of Hamiltonian systems, which subsequently became a part of what is now known as KAM theory.) After graduating from Moscow State University in 1961, Arnold worked there until 1986. He then worked at the Steklov Mathematical Institute and later at the Paris Dauphine University. Arnold became a corresponding member of the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1986 and a full member in 1990. He was an honorary member of the London Mathematical Society (1976), a member of the National Academy of Sciences of the Unites States (1983), the French Academy (1984), the American Academy Arts and Sciences (1987), the Royal Society (1988), the Accademia dei Lincei (1989), the American Philosophical Society (1990), the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences (1991), and the European Academy of Sciences (1991). Arnold received a degree of Doctor Honoris Causa from the following universi- ties: P. et M. Curie, Paris (1979), Warwick (1988), Utrecht (1991), Bologna (1991), Madrid (1994), and Toronto (1997). Arnold served as a vice-president of the Inter- national Mathematical Union from 1995–1998. Arnold was a recipient of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2006 Annual Report
    Contents Clay Mathematics Institute 2006 James A. Carlson Letter from the President 2 Recognizing Achievement Fields Medal Winner Terence Tao 3 Persi Diaconis Mathematics & Magic Tricks 4 Annual Meeting Clay Lectures at Cambridge University 6 Researchers, Workshops & Conferences Summary of 2006 Research Activities 8 Profile Interview with Research Fellow Ben Green 10 Davar Khoshnevisan Normal Numbers are Normal 15 Feature Article CMI—Göttingen Library Project: 16 Eugene Chislenko The Felix Klein Protocols Digitized The Klein Protokolle 18 Summer School Arithmetic Geometry at the Mathematisches Institut, Göttingen, Germany 22 Program Overview The Ross Program at Ohio State University 24 PROMYS at Boston University Institute News Awards & Honors 26 Deadlines Nominations, Proposals and Applications 32 Publications Selected Articles by Research Fellows 33 Books & Videos Activities 2007 Institute Calendar 36 2006 Another major change this year concerns the editorial board for the Clay Mathematics Institute Monograph Series, published jointly with the American Mathematical Society. Simon Donaldson and Andrew Wiles will serve as editors-in-chief, while I will serve as managing editor. Associate editors are Brian Conrad, Ingrid Daubechies, Charles Fefferman, János Kollár, Andrei Okounkov, David Morrison, Cliff Taubes, Peter Ozsváth, and Karen Smith. The Monograph Series publishes Letter from the president selected expositions of recent developments, both in emerging areas and in older subjects transformed by new insights or unifying ideas. The next volume in the series will be Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture, by John Morgan and Gang Tian. Their book will appear in the summer of 2007. In related publishing news, the Institute has had the complete record of the Göttingen seminars of Felix Klein, 1872–1912, digitized and made available on James Carlson.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications with Chaotic Optoelectronic Systems Cryptography and Multiplexing
    COMMUNICATIONS WITH CHAOTIC OPTOELECTRONIC SYSTEMS CRYPTOGRAPHY AND MULTIPLEXING A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Damien Rontani In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology December 2011 Copyright c 2011 by Damien Rontani COMMUNICATIONS WITH CHAOTIC OPTOELECTRONIC SYSTEMS CRYPTOGRAPHY AND MULTIPLEXING Approved by: Professor Steven W. McLaughlin, Professor Erik Verriest Committee Chair School of Electrical and Computer School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Professor David S. Citrin, Advisor Adjunct Professor Alexandre Locquet School of Electrical and Computer School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Marc Sciamanna, Co-advisor Professor Kurt Wiesenfeld Department of Optical School of Physics Communications Georgia Institute of Technology Ecole Sup´erieure d'Electricit´e Professor William T. Rhodes Date Approved: 30 August 2011 School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology To those who have made me who I am today, iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The present PhD research has been prepared in the framework of collaboration between the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech, USA) and the Ecole Sup´erieured'Electricit´e(Sup´elec,France), at the UMI 2958 a joint Laboratory be- tween Georgia Tech and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS, France). I would like to acknowledge the Fondation Sup´elec,the Conseil R´egionalde Lorraine, Georgia Tech, and the National Science Foundation (NSF) for their financial and technical support. I would like to sincerely thank my \research family" starting with my two advisors who made this joint-PhD project possible; Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Recurrence Plots for the Analysis of Complex Systems Norbert Marwan∗, M
    Physics Reports 438 (2007) 237–329 www.elsevier.com/locate/physrep Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems Norbert Marwan∗, M. Carmen Romano, Marco Thiel, Jürgen Kurths Nonlinear Dynamics Group, Institute of Physics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam 14415, Germany Accepted 3 November 2006 Available online 12 January 2007 editor: I. Procaccia Abstract Recurrence is a fundamental property of dynamical systems, which can be exploited to characterise the system’s behaviour in phase space. A powerful tool for their visualisation and analysis called recurrence plot was introduced in the late 1980’s. This report is a comprehensive overview covering recurrence based methods and their applications with an emphasis on recent developments. After a brief outline of the theory of recurrences, the basic idea of the recurrence plot with its variations is presented. This includes the quantification of recurrence plots, like the recurrence quantification analysis, which is highly effective to detect, e. g., transitions in the dynamics of systems from time series. A main point is how to link recurrences to dynamical invariants and unstable periodic orbits. This and further evidence suggest that recurrences contain all relevant information about a system’s behaviour. As the respective phase spaces of two systems change due to coupling, recurrence plots allow studying and quantifying their interaction. This fact also provides us with a sensitive tool for the study of synchronisation of complex systems. In the last part of the report several applications of recurrence plots in economy, physiology, neuroscience, earth sciences, astrophysics and engineering are shown. The aim of this work is to provide the readers with the know how for the application of recurrence plot based methods in their own field of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1006.1489V2 [Math.GT] 8 Aug 2010 Ril.Ias Rfie Rmraigtesre Rils[14 Articles Survey the Reading from Profited Also I Article
    Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly Volume 8, Number 1 (Special Issue: In honor of F. Thomas Farrell and Lowell E. Jones, Part 1 of 2 ) 1—14, 2012 The Work of Tom Farrell and Lowell Jones in Topology and Geometry James F. Davis∗ Tom Farrell and Lowell Jones caused a paradigm shift in high-dimensional topology, away from the view that high-dimensional topology was, at its core, an algebraic subject, to the current view that geometry, dynamics, and analysis, as well as algebra, are key for classifying manifolds whose fundamental group is infinite. Their collaboration produced about fifty papers over a twenty-five year period. In this tribute for the special issue of Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly in their honor, I will survey some of the impact of their joint work and mention briefly their individual contributions – they have written about one hundred non-joint papers. 1 Setting the stage arXiv:1006.1489v2 [math.GT] 8 Aug 2010 In order to indicate the Farrell–Jones shift, it is necessary to describe the situation before the onset of their collaboration. This is intimidating – during the period of twenty-five years starting in the early fifties, manifold theory was perhaps the most active and dynamic area of mathematics. Any narrative will have omissions and be non-linear. Manifold theory deals with the classification of ∗I thank Shmuel Weinberger and Tom Farrell for their helpful comments on a draft of this article. I also profited from reading the survey articles [14] and [4]. 2 James F. Davis manifolds. There is an existence question – when is there a closed manifold within a particular homotopy type, and a uniqueness question, what is the classification of manifolds within a homotopy type? The fifties were the foundational decade of manifold theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae of Vladlen Timorin Personal Information: • Date of Birth
    Curriculum Vitae of Vladlen Timorin Personal Information: ² Date of birth: June 21, 1978 ² Place of birth: Moscow, Russia ² Family status: married, 1 child ² Citizenship: Russia Current Position: Associate Professor at Higher School of Economics, Moscow (since Fall 2009) Positions previously held: ² Post-Doc at Jacobs University Bremen, Germany (2007{2009) ² Lecturer (Post-Doc) at the Institute for Mathematical Sciences, SUNY at Stony Brook (2004{2007) Research Interests: ² Complex dynamics, dynamics of rational functions. ² Quadratic forms. ² Projective di®erential geometry of curves. ² Geometry and combinatorics of convex polytopes. Education: 2004, PhD: University of Toronto, Department of Mathematics, "Recti¯able families of conics", Advisor: Askold Khovanskii 2003, PhD: Steklov Mathematical Institute, Moscow, "Combinatorial Analogues of the Cohomology Algebras for Convex Polytopes" 2000, Diploma: Moscow State University, Department of Mechanics and Mathematics, "An analog of the Hard Lefschetz theorem for polytopes simple in edges" 2000, Diploma: Independent University of Moscow, "Small resolutions of polytopes and the generalized h-vector" Mathematical Honors and Awards: ² MÄobiusPrize, http://www.moebiuscontest.ru ² Ontario Graduate Scholarship ² Connaught Graduate Scholarship, University of Toronto Published research papers: (1) The external boundary of M2, Fields Institute Communications Vol. 53: \Holomorphic Dynamics and Renormalization, A Volume in Honour of John Milnor's 75th Birthday", 225{267 (2) Recti¯able pencils of conics, Moscow Mathematical Journal 7 (2007), no. 3, 561{570 (3) On binary quadratic forms with semigroup property, (joint with Francesca Aicardi), Pro- ceedings of Steklov Institute 258 (2007), the volume dedicated to the 70th birthday of V. Arnold (4) Maps That Take Lines To Circles, in Dimension 4, Functional Analysis and its Applica- tions 40 (2006), no.
    [Show full text]
  • Part III Essay on Serre's Conjecture
    Serre’s conjecture Alex J. Best June 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Background 2 2.1 Modular forms . 2 2.2 Galois representations . 6 3 Obtaining Galois representations from modular forms 13 3.1 Congruences for Ramanujan’s t function . 13 3.2 Attaching Galois representations to general eigenforms . 15 4 Serre’s conjecture 17 4.1 The qualitative form . 17 4.2 The refined form . 18 4.3 Results on Galois representations associated to modular forms 19 4.4 The level . 21 4.5 The character and the weight mod p − 1 . 22 4.6 The weight . 24 4.6.1 The level 2 case . 25 4.6.2 The level 1 tame case . 27 4.6.3 The level 1 non-tame case . 28 4.7 A counterexample . 30 4.8 The proof . 31 5 Examples 32 5.1 A Galois representation arising from D . 32 5.2 A Galois representation arising from a D4 extension . 33 6 Consequences 35 6.1 Finiteness of classes of Galois representations . 35 6.2 Unramified mod p Galois representations for small p . 35 6.3 Modularity of abelian varieties . 36 7 References 37 1 1 Introduction In 1987 Jean-Pierre Serre published a paper [Ser87], “Sur les representations´ modulaires de degre´ 2 de Gal(Q/Q)”, in the Duke Mathematical Journal. In this paper Serre outlined a conjecture detailing a precise relationship between certain mod p Galois representations and specific mod p modular forms. This conjecture and its variants have become known as Serre’s conjecture, or sometimes Serre’s modularity conjecture in order to distinguish it from the many other conjectures Serre has made.
    [Show full text]
  • Notices of the American Mathematical Society June/July 2006
    of the American Mathematical Society ... (I) , Ate._~ f.!.o~~Gffi·u.­ .4-e.e..~ ~~~- •i :/?I:(; $~/9/3, Honoring J ~ rt)d ~cLra-4/,:e~ o-n. /'~7 ~ ~<A at a Gift from fL ~ /i: $~ "'7/<J/3. .} -<.<>-a.-<> ~e.Lz?-1~ CL n.y.L;; ro'T>< 0 -<>-<~:4z_ I Kumbakonam li .d. ~ ~~d a. v#a.d--??">ovt<.·c.-6 ~~/f. t:JU- Lo,.,do-,......) ~a page 640 ~!! ?7?.-L ..(; ~7 Ca.-uM /3~~-d~ .Y~~:Li: ~·e.-l a:.--nd '?1.-d- p ~ .di.,r--·c/~ C(c£~r~~u . J~~~aq_ f< -e-.-.ol ~ ~ ~/IX~ ~ /~~ 4)r!'a.. /:~~c~ •.7~ The Millennium Grand Challenge .(/.) a..Lu.O<"'? ...0..0~ e--ne_.o.AA/T..C<.r~- /;;; '7?'E.G .£.rA-CLL~ ~ ·d ~ in Mathematics C>n.A..U-a.A-d ~~. J /"-L .h. ?n.~ ~?(!.,£ ~ ~ &..ct~ /U~ page 652 -~~r a-u..~~r/a.......<>l/.k> 0?-t- ~at o ~~ &~ -~·e.JL d ~~ o(!'/UJD/ J;I'J~~Lcr~~ 0 ??u£~ ifJ>JC.Qol J ~ ~ ~ -0-H·d~-<.() d Ld.orn.J,k, -F-'1-. ~- a-o a.rd· J-c~.<-r:~ rn-u-{-r·~ ~'rrx ~~/ ~-?naae ~~ a...-'XS.otA----o-n.<l C</.J.d:i. ~~~ ~cL.va- 7 ??.L<A) ~ - Ja/d ~~ ./1---J- d-.. ~if~ ~0:- ~oj'~ t1fd~u: - l + ~ _,. :~ _,. .~., -~- .. =- ~ ~ d.u. 7 ~'d . H J&."dIJ';;;::. cL. r ~·.d a..L- 0.-n(U. jz-o-cn-...l- o~- 4; ~ .«:... ~....£.~.:: a/.l~!T cLc.·£o.-4- ~ d.v. /-)-c~ a;- ~'>'T/JH'..,...~ ~ d~~ ~u ~­ ~ a..t-4. l& foLk~ '{j ~~- e4 -7'~ -£T JZ~~c~ d.,_ .&~ o-n ~ -d YjtA:o ·C.LU~ ~or /)-<..,.,r &-.
    [Show full text]
  • A Translation Of
    2011 A Translation of NJV 72^ dsgecr 1 2011 NJV 72^ dsgecr 2 2011 American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island USA ISSN 0077-1554 TRANSACTIONS OF THE MOSCOW MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Translation edited by Frances H. Goldman with the assistance of AMS staff A translation of TRUDY MOSKOVSKOGO MATEMATIQESKOGO OBWESTVA Editorial Board A. G. Sergeev (Editor in Chief) V. M. Buchstaber E.` B. Vinberg Yu. S. Ilyashenko A. A. Shkalikov A. V. Domrin (Corresponding Secretary) Advisory Board R. A. Minlos S. P. Novikov N. Kh. Rozov Library of Congress Card Number 65-4713 SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION. Transactions of the Moscow Mathematical Society for 2011 will consist of one issue. Beginning in 2004, Transactions of the Moscow Mathematical Society is accessible from www.ams.org/journals/. The subscription prices for 2011 are US$532.00 list; US$425.00 institutional member. Upon request, subscribers to paper delivery of this journal are also entitled to receive electronic delivery. For paper delivery, subscribers outside the United States and India must pay a postage surcharge of US$6.00; subscribers in India must pay a postage surcharge of US$13.00. Expedited delivery to destinations in North America US$8.00; elsewhere US$17.00. Subscription renewals are subject to late fees. See www.ams.org/journal-faq for more journal subscription information. BACK NUMBER INFORMATION. For back issues see www.ams.org/bookstore. Subscriptions and orders should be addressed to American Mathematical Society, P.O. Box 845904, Boston, MA 02284-5904, USA. All orders must be accompanied by payment. Other cor- respondence should be addressed to 201 Charles St., Providence, RI 02904-2294, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Group Theory, Hyperbolic Dynamics and Symplectic Geometry
    Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Report No. 30/2010 DOI: 10.4171/OWR/2010/30 Geometric Group Theory, Hyperbolic Dynamics and Symplectic Geometry Organised by Gerhard Knieper, Bochum Leonid Polterovich, Tel Aviv Leonid Potyagailo, Lille July 11th – July 17th, 2010 Abstract. The main theme of the workshop is the interaction between the speedily developing fields of mathematics mentioned in the title. One of the purposes of the workshop is to highlight new exciting developments which are happening right now on the borderline between hyperbolic dynamics, geometric group theory and symplectic geometry. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 20Fxx, 22E40, 22E46, 22F10, 37D05, 37D40, 37K65, 53C22, 53Dxx. Introduction by the Organisers Most of the talks of the workshop largely included different aspects related to the main themes of the conference. There were talks given by the well-known specialists as well as by young participants (recent PhD or postdoctoral students). The scientific atmosphere was very fruitful. Many interesting scientific discussions between participants certainly generated new ideas for the further research. The following report contains extended abstracts of the presented talks. By continuing our tradition we included an updated list of open important problems related to the workshop. Geometric Group Theory, Hyperbolic Dynamics and Symplectic Geometry 1763 Workshop: Geometric Group Theory, Hyperbolic Dynamics and Symplectic Geometry Table of Contents Norbert Peyerimhoff (joint with Ioannis Ivrissimtzis) Spectral Representations, Archimedean Solids, and finite Coxeter Groups 1765 Fr´ed´eric Bourgeois A brief survey of contact homology ................................1768 Brian H. Bowditch Models of 3-manifolds and hyperbolicity ............................1769 Octav Cornea (joint with Paul Biran) Lagrangian submanifolds: their fundamental group and Lagrangian cobordism ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT IS a CHAOTIC ATTRACTOR? 1. Introduction J. Yorke Coined the Word 'Chaos' As Applied to Deterministic Systems. R. Devane
    WHAT IS A CHAOTIC ATTRACTOR? CLARK ROBINSON Abstract. Devaney gave a mathematical definition of the term chaos, which had earlier been introduced by Yorke. We discuss issues involved in choosing the properties that characterize chaos. We also discuss how this term can be combined with the definition of an attractor. 1. Introduction J. Yorke coined the word `chaos' as applied to deterministic systems. R. Devaney gave the first mathematical definition for a map to be chaotic on the whole space where a map is defined. Since that time, there have been several different definitions of chaos which emphasize different aspects of the map. Some of these are more computable and others are more mathematical. See [9] a comparison of many of these definitions. There is probably no one best or correct definition of chaos. In this paper, we discuss what we feel is one of better mathematical definition. (It may not be as computable as some of the other definitions, e.g., the one by Alligood, Sauer, and Yorke.) Our definition is very similar to the one given by Martelli in [8] and [9]. We also combine the concepts of chaos and attractors and discuss chaotic attractors. 2. Basic definitions We start by giving the basic definitions needed to define a chaotic attractor. We give the definitions for a diffeomorphism (or map), but those for a system of differential equations are similar. The orbit of a point x∗ by F is the set O(x∗; F) = f Fi(x∗) : i 2 Z g. An invariant set for a diffeomorphism F is an set A in the domain such that F(A) = A.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaudin Models Associated to Classical Lie Algebras A
    GAUDIN MODELS ASSOCIATED TO CLASSICAL LIE ALGEBRAS A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Kang Lu In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2020 Purdue University Indianapolis, Indiana ii THE PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL STATEMENT OF DISSERTATION APPROVAL Dr. Evgeny Mukhin, Chair Department of Mathematical Sciences Dr. Alexander Its Department of Mathematical Sciences Dr. Roland Roeder Department of Mathematical Sciences Dr. Vitaly Tarasov Department of Mathematical Sciences Approved by: Dr. Evgeny Mukhin Head of the Graduate Program iii Dedicated to my parents and my wife Ziting Tang. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my advisor Prof. Evgeny Mukhin for his guidance, support and persistent help throughout my time in graduate school and for introducing me to the world of representation theory and quantum integrable systems. I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to Prof. Vitaly Tarasov. I had great pleasure working with him and learned a lot from him. I sincerely appreciate his patient guidance and help. I also sincerely appreciate Prof. Its and Prof. Roeder for offering wonderful classes and for their effort and time in serving in my dissertation committee. Besides, I would like to thank Prof. Zhongmin Shen and Prof. Hanxiang Peng for useful suggestions. In addition, many thanks to the staff in the department for their assistance. Finally, I thank my parents and my wife Ziting Tang for their constant support, encouragement, and love throughout the years. v PREFACE This thesis is mainly based on three publications. Chapters 2 and 3 are based on the publications jointly with Evgeny Mukhin and Alexander Varchenko [LMV16] Kang Lu, E.
    [Show full text]
  • MA427 Ergodic Theory
    MA427 Ergodic Theory Course Notes (2012-13) 1 Introduction 1.1 Orbits Let X be a mathematical space. For example, X could be the unit interval [0; 1], a circle, a torus, or something far more complicated like a Cantor set. Let T : X ! X be a function that maps X into itself. Let x 2 X be a point. We can repeatedly apply the map T to the point x to obtain the sequence: fx; T (x);T (T (x));T (T (T (x))); : : : ; :::g: We will often write T n(x) = T (··· (T (T (x)))) (n times). The sequence of points x; T (x);T 2(x);::: is called the orbit of x. We think of applying the map T as the passage of time. Thus we think of T (x) as where the point x has moved to after time 1, T 2(x) is where the point x has moved to after time 2, etc. Some points x 2 X return to where they started. That is, T n(x) = x for some n > 1. We say that such a point x is periodic with period n. By way of contrast, points may move move densely around the space X. (A sequence is said to be dense if (loosely speaking) it comes arbitrarily close to every point of X.) If we take two points x; y of X that start very close then their orbits will initially be close. However, it often happens that in the long term their orbits move apart and indeed become dramatically different.
    [Show full text]