DOCSLIB.ORG

Service Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Service Assessment Service Assessment Central United States Flooding of June 2008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Silver Spring, Maryland Cover Photograph: Downtown Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Friday, June 13, 2008, as the Cedar River crested more than 11 feet above its previous record. View is upstream. (Used with permission. ©2008 Iowa Homeland Security and Emergency Management Division. Photograph by the Civil Air Patrol.) ii Service Assessment Central United States Flooding of June 2008 December 2009 National Weather Service John L. Hayes, Assistant Administrator for Weather Services iii Preface During June 2008, record or major flooding occurred across large areas of the central United States. The flooding had devastating impacts, with 11 people losing their lives. Damages have been estimated at over $5 billion. The states most severely affected were Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. Also, heavily impacted were Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, and Oklahoma. In all, 143 National Weather Service river forecast locations experienced major flooding, with 73 of these locations establishing records. Because of the severe impact of the flooding, the National Weather Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration formed a Service Assessment Team to evaluate National Weather Service performance during the event. Special attention was given to National Weather Service coordination with other Federal, state, local, and private entities. The recommendations from this assessment will lead to improvements in the quality of National Weather Service products and services and enhance the public’s ability to make more informed decisions associated with flood events. The ultimate goal of this report is to further the National Weather Service mission of protecting lives and property and enhancing the national economy. John L. Hayes Assistant Administrator for Weather Services December 2009 iv Table of Contents Page Preface............................................................................................................................................ iv Table of Contents.............................................................................................................................v List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. viii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. xi Service Assessment Team............................................................................................................. xii Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................... xii Executive Summary..................................................................................................................... xiii 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................1 1.1 NWS Mission......................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose of the Service Assessment.....................................................................................1 1.3 Methodology.......................................................................................................................2 2. Summary of the Meteorology, Hydrology, Damage, and Other Impacts of the Event ..............3 2.1 Rainfall and Flooding Overview.........................................................................................3 2.2 Impacts................................................................................................................................8 2.3 Comparison to Flooding of 1993 ......................................................................................13 3. Summary of NWS Flood Forecasting Operations for the Event ..............................................15 3.1 Internal Operations............................................................................................................16 3.2 Intragovernmental Cooperation ........................................................................................16 3.3 Emergency Management Community ..............................................................................17 3.4 Media/Public.....................................................................................................................17 4. Facts, Findings, Recommendations, and Best Practices...........................................................18 4.1 Usefulness of the Tools and Data in the Forecast Process................................................18 4.1.1 Observed Precipitation...........................................................................................18 4.1.2 Forecast Precipitation.............................................................................................20 4.1.3 River Flow Observations/Rating Curves ...............................................................21 4.1.4 Time Series Analysis .............................................................................................22 4.1.5 River Flow Modeling.............................................................................................23 4.1.5.1 Site-Specific Headwater Modeling...........................................................23 4.1.5.2 NWS River Forecast System Modeling....................................................23 4.1.5.2.1 Impacts Regarding Rating Curve Extensions ..........................23 4.1.5.2.2 Limited Ability to Account for Levee Failures........................24 4.1.5.2.3 Impacts of Changing Land Use Characteristics.......................26 4.1.5.3 Ensemble River Forecasts.........................................................................26 4.1.5.4 Forecast Dissemination Tool ....................................................................28 4.1.6 Collaboration Tools ...............................................................................................28 4.1.6.1 IEMChat/NWSChat ..................................................................................28 v 4.1.6.2 12Planet.....................................................................................................29 4.1.6.3 River Forecast Product..............................................................................30 4.2 Collaboration among the NWS, USACE, and USGS in the Flood Forecast Process.......30 4.2.1 Agency Roles.........................................................................................................30 4.2.1.1 USGS ........................................................................................................30 4.2.1.2 USACE .....................................................................................................31 4.2.1.3 NWS..........................................................................................................32 4.2.2 Interagency Collaboration—Successes and Lessons Learned...............................33 4.2.2.1 Prior to an Event .......................................................................................33 4.2.2.2 During an Event ........................................................................................33 4.2.3 Opportunities for Enhanced Collaboration ............................................................34 4.3 Accuracy and Effectiveness of Service.............................................................................35 4.3.1 Forecast and Warning Accuracy............................................................................35 4.3.1.1 Quantitative Precipitation Forecast Verification ......................................35 4.3.1.2 Flood Warning Verification......................................................................36 4.3.1.3 Qualitative Verification ............................................................................41 4.3.2 NWS Responsiveness ............................................................................................42 4.3.3 Usefulness of Products and Services .....................................................................43 4.3.4 Reliability of Products and Services......................................................................44 4.3.5 Enhancements to Products and Services Requested by Partners and Other Users............................................................................................................44 4.3.5.1 Flood Impact Statements...........................................................................44 4.3.5.2 Flood Inundation Mapping .......................................................................45 4.3.5.3 Communication Methods..........................................................................45 4.4 Societal Perceptions..........................................................................................................46 4.4.1 Communication, Forecast Uncertainty, and the Decision-making Process...........46 4.4.2 Experience with the Central United States Flood of 1993.....................................48 4.4.3 Integrating the Behavioral Sciences, Meteorology, and Hydrology......................49 5. Concluding Remarks.................................................................................................................50
Load more

Recommended publications
  • E.3-IDNR Roster of Navigable Waterways in Indiana
    APPENDIX E.3 IDNR Roster of Navigable Waterways in Indiana Nonrule Policy Documents NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Information Bulletin #3 July 1, 1992 SUBJECT: Roster of Indiana Waterways Declared Navigable I. NAVIGABILITY Property rights relative to Indiana waterways often are determined by whether the waterway is "navigable". Both common law and statutory law make distinctions founded upon whether a river, stream, embayment, or lake is navigable. A landmark decision in Indiana with respect to determining and applying navigability is State v. Kivett, 228 Ind. 629, 95 N.E.2d 148 (1950). The Indiana Supreme Court stated that the test for determining navigability is whether a waterway: was available and susceptible for navigation according to the general rules of river transportation at the time [1816] Indiana was admitted to the Union. It does not depend on whether it is now navigable. .The true test seems to be the capacity of the stream, rather than the manner or extent of use. And the mere fact that the presence of sandbars or driftwood or stone, or other objects, which at times render the stream unfit for transportation, does not destroy its actual capacity and susceptibility for that use. A modified standard for determining navigability applies to a body of water which is artificial. The test for a man-made reservoir, or a similar waterway which did not exist in 1816, is whether it is navigable in fact. Reed v. United States, 604 F. Supp. 1253 (1984). The court observed in Kivett that "whether the waters within the State under which the lands lie are navigable or non-navigable, is a federal" question and is "determined according to the law and usage recognized and applied in the federal courts, even though" the waterway may not be "capable of use for navigation in interstate or foreign commerce." Federal decisions applied to particular issues of navigability are useful precedents, regardless of whether the decisions originated in Indiana or another state.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Profile Idaho Facts
    Idaho Profile Idaho Facts Name: Originally suggested for Colorado, the name “Idaho” was used for a steamship which traveled the Columbia River. With the discovery of gold on the Clearwater River in 1860, the diggings began to be called the Idaho mines. “Idaho” is a coined or invented word, and is not a derivation of an Indian phrase “E Dah Hoe (How)” supposedly meaning “gem of the mountains.” Nickname: The “Gem State” Motto: “Esto Perpetua” (Let it be perpetual) Discovered By Europeans: 1805, the last of the 50 states to be sighted Organized as Territory: March 4, 1863, act signed by President Lincoln Entered Union: July 3, 1890, 43rd state to join the Union Official State Language: English Geography Total Area: 83,569 square miles – 14th in area size (read more) Water Area: 926 square miles Highest Elevation: 12,662 feet above sea level at the summit of Mt. Borah, Custer County in the Lost River Range Lowest Elevation: 770 feet above sea level at the Snake River at Lewiston Length: 164/479 miles at shortest/longest point Width: Geographic 45/305 miles at narrowest/widest point Center: Number of settlement of Custer on the Yankee Fork River, Custer County Lakes: Navigable more than 2,000 Rivers: Largest Snake, Coeur d’Alene, St. Joe, St. Maries and Kootenai Lake: Lake Pend Oreille, 180 square miles Temperature Extremes: highest, 118° at Orofino July 28, 1934; lowest, -60° at Island Park Dam, January 18, 1943 2010 Population: 1,567,582 (US Census Bureau) Official State Holidays New Year’s Day January 1 Martin Luther King, Jr.-Human Rights Day Third Monday in January Presidents Day Third Monday in February Memorial Day Last Monday in May Independence Day July 4 Labor Day First Monday in September Columbus Day Second Monday in October Veterans Day November 11 Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday in November Christmas December 25 Every day appointed by the President of the United States, or by the governor of this state, for a public fast, thanksgiving, or holiday.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of the Freshwater Mussels
    ILLINO S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007. bO&C Natural History Survey TLf94S Library I l' 13) SURVEY OF THE FRESHWATER MUSSELS (MOLLUSCA: UNIONIDAE) OF THE WABASH RIVER DRAINAGE PHASE III: WHITE RIVER AND SELECTED TRIBUTARIES Kevin S. Cummings, Christine A. Mayer, and Lawrence M. Page Center for Biodiversity Technical Report 1991 (3) Illinois Natural History Survey 607 E. Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 Prepared for Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife 607 State Office Building Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Study Funded by a Grant from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources Nongame & Endangered Wildlife Program Endangered Species Act Project E- 1, Study 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF FIGURES..................................................................................................... i LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................2 STUDY AREA AND METHODS.............................................................................. 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.............................................. .................................. 9 SPECIES ACCOUNTS............................... ...............................................................21 RECOMMENDATIONS..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Landforms and Resources
    Name _____________________________ Class _________________ Date __________________ Physical Geography of the United States and Canada Section 1 Landforms and Resources Terms and Names Appalachian Mountains major mountain chain in the eastern United States and Canada Great Plains largely treeless area in the interior lowlands Canadian Shield rocky, flat area that surrounds Hudson Bay Rocky Mountains mountain chain in the western United States and Canada Continental Divide line of the highest points in the Rockies that marks the separation between rivers flowing to the east and to the west Great Lakes five large lakes found in the central United States and Canada Mackenzie River Canada’s longest river Before You Read In the last chapter, you read about human geography–the way humans in general relate to their environment. In this section, you will learn about the physical features and resources of the United States and Canada. As You Read Use a graphic organizer to take notes about the landforms and resources of the United States and Canada. LANDSCAPE INFLUENCED The United States and Canada are rich DEVELOPMENT (Page 117) in natural resources. They have much How vast are these countries? fertile soil and water and many forests and The United States and Canada occupy the minerals. This geographic richness has central and northern four-fifths of the attracted immigrants from around the continent of North America. Culturally, the world for centuries. region is known as Anglo America. This is 1. What binds Canada and the United because both countries were colonies of States together? Great Britain at one time and because most of _______________________________ the people speak English.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Valleys of the New England Coast As Related to Fluctuations of Sea Level
    Bedrock Valleys of the New England Coast as Related to Fluctuations of Sea Level By JOSEPH E. UPSON and CHARLES W. SPENCER SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 454-M Depths to bedrock in coastal valleys of New England, and nature of sedimentary Jill resulting from sea-level fluctuations in Pleistocene and Recent time UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication, as follows: Upson, Joseph Edwin, 1910- Bedrock valleys of the New England coast as related to fluctuations of sea level, by Joseph E. Upson and Charles W. Spencer. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1964. iv, 42 p. illus., maps, diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 454-M) Shorter contributions to general geology. Bibliography: p. 39-41. (Continued on next card) Upson, Joseph Edwin, 1910- Bedrock valleys of the New England coast as related to fluctuations of sea level. 1964. (Card 2) l.Geology, Stratigraphic Pleistocene. 2.Geology, Stratigraphic Recent. S.Geology New England. I.Spencer, Charles Winthrop, 1930-joint author. ILTitle. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Configuration and depth of bedrock valleys, etc. Con. Page Abstract.__________________________________________ Ml Buried valleys of the Boston area. _ _______________
    [Show full text]
  • Heat Index Climatology for the North-Central United States
    HEAT INDEX CLIMATOLOGY FOR THE NORTH-CENTRAL UNITED STATES Todd Rieck National Weather Service La Crosse, Wisconsin 1. Introduction middle Mississippi River Valleys, and the western Great Lakes. Also, the physiological Heat is an underrated danger, with an response to heat will be briefly investigated, average of 175 Americans losing their lives including a review of how heat acclimatization annually from heat-related causes. According to affects the human body’s biology. This the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, protective biological response is an important from 1979-2003 excessive heat exposure consideration when evaluating the impact of the caused 8,015 deaths in the United States. heat on those that are, or are not, acclimatized During this period, more people died from to the heat. extreme heat than from hurricanes, lightning, tornadoes, and floods combined. In this study, 95°F will be used as the start for the climatological analysis as prolonged Heat kills by taxing the human body beyond exposure to heat this warm increases the risk of its ability to cool itself. Cooling is primarily sunstroke, heat cramps, and heat exhaustion accomplished by the evaporation of perspiration. (Table 1) . How efficiently this process functions is directly related to the amount of water vapor in the air. 2. Data High moisture content reduces the evaporative cooling rate of perspiration, making it difficult for All available weather observations from the the body to maintain a steady and safe internal National Climatic Data Center were used from temperature. One way to measure the 192 locations (Fig. 1), extending from Utah to combined effect of temperature and moisture on Michigan, and from the Canadian-U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    NEW ENGLAND CLEAN ENERGY CONNECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOE/EA-2155 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY WASHINGTON, DC JANUARY 2021 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................. V FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ V TABLES .......................................................................................................................................... V ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ VII 1. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PRESIDENTIAL PERMITS .................................................................................................... 2 1.2 SCOPE OF DOE’S ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ................................................................ 2 1.3 RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS .......................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above-Referenced Standard Individual Permit Application [i.e., CENAE-RDC; NAE-2017-01342]” (July 7, 2020) and Environmental Assessment Addendum; Central Maine Power Company (CMP); New England Clean Energy Connect (NECEC); File No. NAE-2017-01342
    [Show full text]
  • The Forests of Southern New England, 2007 a Report on the Forest Resources of Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island
    The Forests of Southern New England, 2007 A Report on the Forest Resources of Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island Resource Bulletin NRS-55 United States Forest Northern Department of Agriculture Service Research Station Abstract This report summarizes the results of the fi fth forest inventory of the forests of Southern New England, defi ned as Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island, conducted by the U.S. Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis program. Previous inventories were conducted in 1998, 1985, 1972, and 1953. Information in this report includes forest attributes, ownership, land-use change, carbon, timber products, forest health, and statistics and quality assurance of data collection. There are 5.1 million acres of forest land across the region: 3.0 million acres of forest land is in Massachusetts, 1.7 million acres in Connecticut, and 0.4 million acres in Rhode Island. This amount has decreased by 5 percent since the last inventory was completed in 1998. There are 2.6 billion trees on this forest land that have a total volume of 12.6 billion cubic feet. Red maple and eastern white pine are the most common species in terms of both numbers of trees and volume. Fifty percent of the forest land is classifi ed as the oak- hickory forest type. Acknowledgments There are a great many people who made this report possible. We would like to thank the following individuals for their hard work and dedication: Carol Alerich, Todd Bixby, Aarron Clark, Ted Goodnight, Mark Hansen, John Higham, Bob Ilgenfritz, Erika Mattson, Jason Morrison, Dennis May, Will McWilliams, Dacia Meneguzzo, Anne Quinion, Joyce Quinn, Brian Rudd, Bryan Tirrell, Jim Westfall, John Vissage, and Ashley Zickefoose.
    [Show full text]
  • Tables Related to Indiana's 2020 303(D) List Review
    Enclosure 3 Tables Related to Indiana’s 2020 303(d) List Review Table 1 (1 of 249) Section 1: Waterbody AUs and Impairment Listings under Category 5 TABLE 1: IN's Waterbody AUs and Impairments Listed in Category 5 (303d list) of Partial Approval.A PRIORITY WATERBODY AU ID WATERBODY AU NAME AU SIZE UNITS CAUSE OF IMPAIRMENT USE_NAME RANKING INA0341_01 FISH CREEK, WEST BRANCH 3.32 Miles BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY Medium Warm Water Aquatic Life INA0341_02 FISH CREEK, WEST BRANCH 2.36 Miles BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY Medium Warm Water Aquatic Life INA0344_01 HIRAM SWEET DITCH 1.32 Miles NUTRIENTS Medium Warm Water Aquatic Life BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY Medium Warm Water Aquatic Life INA0345_T1001 FISH CREEK - UNNAMED TRIBUTARY 3.09 Miles ESCHERICHIA COLI (E. COLI) Medium Full Body Contact BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY Medium Warm Water Aquatic Life INA0346_02 FISH CREEK 7.3 Miles ESCHERICHIA COLI (E. COLI) Medium Full Body Contact INA0352_03 BIG RUN 10.33 Miles ESCHERICHIA COLI (E. COLI) Medium Full Body Contact INA0352_04 BIG RUN 2.46 Miles BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY Medium Warm Water Aquatic Life INA0352_05 BIG RUN 5.91 Miles BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY Medium Warm Water Aquatic Life INA0355_01 ST. JOSEPH RIVER 2.5 Miles PCBS IN FISH TISSUE Low Human Health and Wildlife INA0356_03 ST. JOSEPH RIVER 3.53 Miles PCBS IN FISH TISSUE Low Human Health and Wildlife INA0362_05 CEDAR CREEK 0.83 Miles BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY Medium Warm Water Aquatic Life INA0363_T1001 MATSON DITCH - UNNAMED TRIBUTARY 2.15 Miles ESCHERICHIA COLI (E. COLI) Medium Full Body Contact INA0364_01 CEDAR CREEK 4.24
    [Show full text]
  • Naturally Occurring Asbestos Locations in the Contiguous USA and Alaska and the 100 Fastest Growing U.S
    Naturally Occurring Asbestos Locations in the Contiguous USA and Alaska and the 100 Fastest Growing U.S. Counties 0 250 500 Miles 0 250 500 Kilometers Asbestos does not occur naturally in Hawaii. 1,2,3,4 Prospect 1,2,3,4 Past producer 4 Former Processing Plant 1,2,3,4 Occurrences of Asbestos 2,3 Fibrous Amphiboles 5 Top 100 fastest growing county Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic, NAD 83 (preserves local directions) Former Processing Plants are plants that once processed asbestos. Asbestos is no longer processed in the United States. Prospect indicates that the asbestos deposit was prospected (evaluated) for possible commercial use, typically by trenching and (or) drilling, but the deposit was not further developed. Occurrence indicates that asbestos was reported at this site. This category 0 125 250 500 Miles includes (1) sites where asbestos-bearing rock is described in a geologic map or report; and (2) asbestos noted as an accessory mineral or vein deposit within another type of mineral deposit. 0 250 500 Kilometers 1 U.S.Geological Survey. 2005 Ver. 2, Reported historic asbestos mines, historic asbestos prospects, and natural asbestos occurrences in the eastern United States. Past Producer is an asbestos mine that once operated in the U.S. but is currently Reston, Virginia. [cited 2006 March]. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1189/. 2 closed; the equipment or structures may have been removed or abandoned. There U.S.Geological Survey. 2006, Reported historic asbestos prospects, and natural asbestos occurrences in the central United States. Reston, Virginia. [cited 2006 August].
    [Show full text]
  • INRC 1997 Outstanding Rivers List for Indiana
    Indiana Register NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Information Bulletin #4 (Second Amendment) SUBJECT: Outstanding Rivers List for Indiana I. INTRODUCTION To help identify the rivers and streams that have particular environmental or aesthetic interest, a special listing has been prepared by the Division of Outdoor Recreation of the Department of Natural Resources. The listing is a corrected and condensed version of a listing compiled by American Rivers and dated October 1990. There are about 2,000 river miles included on the listing, a figure that represents less than 9% of the estimated 24,000 total river miles in Indiana. The Natural Resources Commission has adopted the listing as an official recognition of the resource values of these waters. A river included in the listing qualifies under one or more of the following 22 categories. An asterisk indicates that all or part of the river segment was also included in the "Roster of Indiana Waterways Declared Navigable", 15 IR 2385 (July 1992). In 2006, the commission updated this citation, and Information Bulletin #3 (Second Amendment) was posted in the Indiana Register at 20061011-IR-312060440NRA. A river designated "EUW" is an exceptional use water. A river designated "HQW" is a high quality water, and a river designated "SS" is a salmonoid stream. 1. Designated national Wild and Scenic Rivers. Rivers that Congress has included in the National Wild and Scenic System pursuant to the National Wild and Scenic River Act, Public Law 90-452. 2. National Wild and Scenic Study Rivers. Rivers that Congress has determined should be studied for possible inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
    [Show full text]
  • Central United States Earthquake Consortium (CUSEC) Overview
    Central United States Earthquake Consortium (CUSEC) Overview Who’s doing what and ways to improve the effort… FEMA Supported Consortia FR5 FR7 FR4 FR6 CUSEC Member States CUSEC Associate States NESEC Member States WSSPC Member States Alaska No Consortia Affiliation Cascadia Regional Earthquake Workgroup Hawaii Earthquake Program in the Central U.S. Built Around a Shared Hazard • Small core of dedicated organizations and individuals within – Research, Engineering, and Emergency Management areas • Weak to moderate relationship on a day to day basis in many cases – stove pipes, professional differences, lack leadership • CUSEC - Emergency Management focused but works to foster closer collaboration among these and other interested parties Earthquake Program Built Around A Partnership Approach International, Federal, State, Local partners Guatemala Mexico Earthquake Centers CERI/Smaller centers Mid-America Earthquake Center DHS components S&T Infrastructure Protection FEMA Hq and Regions IV, V, VI, VII – Response, Recovery, Preparedness & Mitigation Directorates Emergency Management Assistance Compact Private Sector Utilities Various Vendor Business, Industry, and Voluntary Organizations Institutions George Washington University/ Virginia Tech Sandia & Argon National Labs Roles & Relationships Earthquake Program Within EM in the Central U.S. State Emergency Management Agencies – IN DHS – Directors / CUSEC Board Expectations / Sets Policy State Eq. Program Multi-State Eq. Program Program Manager CUSEC Works at the state and
    [Show full text]