This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 23 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK

Routledge Handbook of and Feminist

Anindita Datta, Peter Hopkins, Lynda Johnston, Elizabeth Olson, Joseli Maria Silva

From Order to Chaos

Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315164748-4 Carl Bonner-Thompson, Graeme William Mearns, Alessandro Boussalem, Ged Ridley Published online on: 30 Apr 2020

How to cite :- Carl Bonner-Thompson, Graeme William Mearns, Alessandro Boussalem, Ged Ridley. 30 Apr 2020, From Order to Chaos from: Routledge Handbook of Gender and Feminist Geographies Routledge Accessed on: 23 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315164748-4

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT

Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms

This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.

The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. 27

Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 18:48 23 Sep 2021; For: 9781315164748, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315164748-4 by post-​ city towards (Peake aradical project ofdestabilizing sexualandspatialnorms 2016). Motivated tomovea milestoneinitsutilityofqueer theory beyond lesbianandgay ofthe geographies David BellandGill Valentine published MappingDesirein1995,aneditedvolume credited as and overt (AdlerandBrenner 1992). discrimination ofhomosexuality explain thelesbianandgay identifiedin SanFranciscototheothering clusters ofthefield’sthe mostattentioninterms origins, perhapsasthis to was lesspositivist inefforts a handfulofUSneighbourhoods. Nevertheless, Castells’ (1983)CityandtheGrassroots garners (1979) and Weightman ofgay (1981)mappedspatialaggregations men(andsomelesbians)in in astudyof ‘vice’ inthe1920sChicagoSchool. Later, Loyd andRowntree (1978), Levine formations, whiledelimitingsomepossible future directions. have sincethe1990s, transformed whenthefield was cemented. Thischaptercovers key trans- Inshort,sex remains criminalized? ‘I Just MadeLove’ indicatesjusthow much intimateworlds safety, where same-​ especiallyincountries sexual identities, practicesandpoliticsinthissemi-​ the prevalence ofsame-​ are gained from mapping sex in this manner? are observable?What spatial patterns How does indicate thelocationofsexonamapusingsmartphone? What visceraland/​ ities in2018, manifoldquestionsforthefield. stillspurs suchaservice Whatmotivates peopleto with, oftheencounter. accompaniedby descriptions ofsexual- Inthinkingaboutgeographies Mercator projection. People use ‘pins’ they to indicate the gender(s) of the person(s) have sex vice remains oftheplaceswhere have afunctionthatallows users theinscription sexontothe thatare intodailyroutines,others oftennow alsonormalised the ‘unique’ feature ofthisser- Just MadeLove’ (Gray, 2011). Now reworked thatresembles intoadatingservice countless Several years ago, one of us had our attention directed mapping service, to a new digital ‘I By themid-​ linked whofirst Burgess (1929)isoftencitedastheethnographer sexualitytourbanprocesses , foreground arangeofnon-​ itscontributors FROM ORDER TO Carl Bonner-​ 1990s, ‘sexuality andspace’ was subfieldoffeministgeographies. animportant Section 1: mappingSection of sexualities geographies Alessandro Boussalem and Ged Ridley Geographies of sexualities sex sexualactivity inandby this ‘global’ mapnuance thinkingabout Thompson, Graeme William Mearns, sex sexualactivity and/​ 3 27 public community? Dopeopleconsider CHAOS or non-​ heterosexualities, utilizing marital heterosexual marital or bodilypleasures 28

Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 18:48 23 Sep 2021; For: 9781315164748, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315164748-4 (Duggan 2003). and diversity within queer lives according to gender, race, ethnicity, class and other differences while adoptingwhatmightnow bedeemedan ‘intersectional’ framework tohighlightfluidity in urban and economic , such work challenged the myth of and gay affluence (Browne 2007), begantobeunpacked. Backed oftheneoliberalprocesses by prevalent critiques prevalent inconsumerspaces, suchasonthebarandclubscene(Skeggs et al. 2004)andPride featured (Bellet al. heavily 1994). ofsexualitiescommentary inearlygeographies Exclusions gay/​ Butler’s theassumed todisrupt (1990)conceptofperformativity ‘naturalness’ ofmale/​ shot, but the remainder of this chapter highlights a raft of things still waiting to be understood Whittemore 2016; Taylor andSnowdon 2014; Valentine et al. 2016). Weosity are atiny selectionofthe topics now canprovide studied(Binnie2016; onlyasnap- Gray et al. 2016; and Smart ofonlinesexualnetworks,the normalization queerlives- andLGBTQreligi inthe countryside prejudices. ofmarriage, andrelationships, face family The changing growth intransactivism, lives inallplaces, but toavaryingintensity, from ranging deathandviolence through to subtler uneven continues againstlesbian, anddiscrimination gay, bisexual, transandotherqueer(LGBTQ) andtheorized. sexualized spacesare experienced suchasOKCupid,services overlay howTinder orGrindr grid, rupturing spacewitha digital ​ and sexualities has largely been democratized through technologies – digital what we now realize assemblages as multifaceted of bodies imbued withdiscursive codings of mapping sexualityinearlyresearch. This once-​ seen by by thoseworking ofconsiderable stigmatopushatscholarlyboundaries intheface ‘chaos’ and ‘complexity’ apparent across ‘I Just MadeLove’ couldarguably nothave beenfore- ofdebate,period removed far from of sexuality-​ simplecorrelations social andspatialorders, imbued withuneven power relations. whatisnow alively During takeporary onthefield’s standing now. especially inintroducing sexualcitizenship. Johnston (2015, 2017, 2018a)provides acontem- Binnie and Valentine’s (1999)review ofthefieldthrough tothelate-​ of domesticitylargelyassumedtobeprivate, like thehome(Beasley et al. 2015; Pilkey 2014). of marriage, sexwork andnormative readings offamily. The lasthasinvolved spaces queering (Browne 2006). More are scholars doing thiswitha focus on heterosexuality, especially in terms ofgenderandsexualityratherthan binaries ‘just’ representing ‘abject’ and ‘abnormal’ lives Section 2, ‘Queer geographies’). the prevailing squeamishness. This, heargues, oftenworks tounderpin ‘heteronormativity’ (see oftalkingmore aboutsexualactswithinthedisciplinetocounterfromimportance within (seealsoBinnie1997).identity categories Concurrently, Bell(2007)courageouslystressed the and flesh (as well asidentity)highlighthow desire canunfold in ways that undoassumed ‘happenings’ or ‘practices’) todiscussoverlooked potentialsofdesire; positingthatsmells, objects ture doessimilar, withnon-​ engaging the readings ofdiscursive identity asfluid. Brown’s (2008)studyofgay men’s cul- cruising attempted to stabilize gender and sexuality by regulating bodily fluids, suchas sweat, nuanced bodies beneathidentities, contendingthattheways intheirresearch inwhichtheparticipants and Johnston (2014)spoke ofthe dilemmaofreproducing heteronormativity by subjugating ofrepresentation inandtotheseprocessesimportance anddiscourse (Johnston 2018a). Misgav Performativity also motivated of debate about the risk ‘disembodying’ desire, vis-​ While significantlegalchallengeshave been ‘won’, ofsexualities thegeographies remain For over three decades, have geographers investigated how sexualities (re)produce certain Queer perspectives now traverse multiple paths, withundoing but typicallyshare aconcern straight andmind/​ body dichotomies(Johnston 2015). Debatesaround performativity Carl Bonner-Thompson et al. representational andaffective (anemphasison theories 28 academic questtodeducespatialorder from 1990s remains vitalreading, space, thevisualizationsof wherein à-​ female, vis the 29

Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 18:48 23 Sep 2021; For: 9781315164748, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315164748-4 section, we present the ‘sparks’ ofqueerinquiry. of spacesandsexualitiesthatadoptqueerperspectives andconceptshave multiplied. Inthenext analysesrepresentsinto geographical turn. animportant Over thelastcoupleofdecades, studies some futures we seeforthefield. andtheirincorporation Theemergenceofqueertheorizations forward, alongsidequeertheory. We before oftransgeographies mapping thenexplore therise approachesreaders uptodatewithcomplementary thatmay take ofsexualities thegeographies wishing tonavigatethisdiverse time. forthefirst andcontribute fieldofscholarship this chapterisnottoofferacorrective tothechaos we now seeas unfolding but toassistthose by thosewithinthefield. sexualityandspace, tocorrelate Mindfulofinitialefforts of thethrust heteronormative assumptions andinstitutionsbut upholdsandsustains themwhilstpromising asa homonormativity Duggan (2003, ‘politicsthatdoesnotcontestdominant 179) defined justice) areby themselves tobeunderstood socialactors (CollinsandBilge 2016). cases where onewishestoattendhow thelives ofoppressed people(andtheirpraxes towards andtheirassociatedpoliticscanbecounterproductivea totaldismissalofidentitycategories in axes ofdominationthatdifferentially influencethe lives ofindividuals and groups. Consequently, figure’,failing toobserve specific risks but Seidman(1995, suggeststhatqueertheory 131) also thisdeconstructive exposes theory Considering identity ‘the limitsandinstabilitiesofabinary through heteronormativetheir socialconstruction regulatory laws, institutionsandsystems. configurations of sex, binary seeks to disrupt of gender and sexualities, showing opposite’homosexuality asitsbinary (Corberand Valocchi 2003, 4). Butler’s (1993)formulation as be summarized thatmake andorganize heterosexuality‘the setof norms seem naturalorright The concept of heteronormativity has been central to the subfield of queer geographies, and can identities andknowledge, to apoliticsofhomonormativity. turned somegeographers ofsexualitiesuntilthecentury’sthe geographies turn. To ofqueer challengethenormalization still comparatively tothoseilluminatedinSection1ofthischapter, marginal whichdominated health, globalization, domesticity, geopoliticsandpoverty’ (Oswin 2008, 100). These topicsare sectional queerperspective include ‘transnational labourflows, diaspora, immigration, public withracialized,cert classedandgendered processes’. Topics thatcouldbenefitfrom aninter- asfocusedsolelyonnon-​ theory Valentine 2007). For Oswin (2008, 100), tomove itremains necessary past framingsofqueer unfoldand/ ​ variances havegeographers outlinedhow mightbedeployed how tounderstand such layered oppressionfromfaced that differs thosebya White working-​ affiliation toone’s working-​ bian –​ subjectiveaccording toparticular positions ofways thevariety exploring inwhichprocesses are lived ofmarginalization outandfelt help toovercome someofthelimitsqueertheory. in helpsgeographers Intersectionality difference(s), hasbeennotedasbeingapotentiallyusefulapproach intersectionality thatmight ​ – We by start highlightingsomeofthelimitstoperformativity, withtheaimofbringing With focusonhow different modesofpower –​ but alsobeingBlackinpredominantly White spaces, whilealsomaintainingacomplex interlocktoproduce aspecifickindofoppression forthosewhooccupy oneormore Section 3: homonormativitySection and homonationalism or are reproduced spatiallysothatthey canbetackled (Hopkins2017; From order to chaos: geographies of sexualities class background; asubjective positionthatwould likely reveal a Section 2: queer geographies 2: queer Section heterosexual lives to ‘examine sexuality’s deployment incon- 29 say, les- tobeingaBritish thosepertaining ableism, classism, homophobia, racismand class lesbian. A number of 30

Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 18:48 23 Sep 2021; For: 9781315164748, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315164748-4 structural standpoints (Strykerand structural Whittle 2006). The latteroftenusedtranssubjectivities to standpoints ofgenderstudies, research andother post-​ particularly atthefoldsofqueertheory sexualities have becomemore closelyalignedwiththeconcepts, andepistemological theories Trans have geographies andlively emergedasan important of subfieldasthegeographies chapter. to theemergenceoftransgeographies, inthesubsequentsectionof whichare summarized development ofthe field, infurthering the bodyisarguably important whilealsobeingcentral of bodilyboundaries, whichimpactsonsexual andgendered expressions. Greater attentionto how tothemakingandremaking tohelpunderstand haptic geographies touchcontributes (2012)have brought(2012) andMorrison ofsexualitiesintoconversation thegeographies with done intheirstudyofsweat managementamongyoung peoplein Australia. BothJohnston feminist perspectives (those of with haptic geographies ‘touch’), as Waitt and Stains (2015)have among menseekingsex. alsoreveal Bothofthese geographers possibilitiestoengage corporeal tion, whileBrown (2008)combinesqueerandaffective toobserve theories ‘cruising’ practices relationships between sexualitiesand spaceinnew ways. have aspectsofhumanexperience toexamine enabled queergeographers and affectsascritical can refer tobothhumanandnonhumancomposites. The workings ofemotions, embodiments of abodytoimpactotherbodiesandbeaffected by them’. Inturn, hesuggeststhat ‘body’ 68) productively combinesqueerandaffective theories, affectas understanding ‘thecapability thatare not(yet)human experience cognitive. Affective ofthisshift. are part theories Lim(2007, (Davidson and Milligan 2004). This focus has allowed to emphasize aspects of geographers thecomplexityofsocial tounderstand prominenceworld inefforts infeministgeographies thepasttwo decades,During thescaleof body(includingemotionalresponses) hasgained to diversify themulti-​ 2015). Homonationalismprompts manifoldquestions ofsexualcitizenshipthatneedanswering in theconsumerpracticesthatsuchinitiatives tendtoencompass(Hubbard and Wilkinson others, those of lower particularly economic status who may have limited means to participate branding initiatives to thatare andnormative canbolsterregulatory discourses detrimental Islamophobic stances (Kehl thatlegitimize 2018); discourses rights andhow ‘gay-​ 2010);nities (Haritaworn how politicaldemonstrationsandparadescanuselimitedLGBTQ andgenderidentitycanworkpolicies around tooppress sexualorientation racializedcommu- ​ subtle – and practices that are analyses of discourses revealinggeographical of the prevailing –​ racialized other. Deployed withinanassemblage framework, homonationalismcanaidcritical inthe discourses West canproduce andsustainnationalistideology thatworks tooppress the such complicities, Puar(2006)coinstheterm ‘homonationalism’ tostress how queer particular archal, classistandracialsystemsofoppression (Nast2002; Oswin 2004). Inheranalysisof neoliberal modes of consumption, allowing- the observation of queer complicities with patri eration ofhow someLGBTQpeoplearecitizens whoare includedas active inupholding anchored indomesticityandconsumption’. Deployment oftheconceptpromotes consid- the possibilityofademobilizedgay constituencyandaprivatized, depoliticizedgay culture ​ Gorman- prejudices thatmarkdiverse queerlives: for example, how well-​ Murray (2009) hasappliedanembodiedframeworkMurray - tohisstudyofqueermigra Section 4: expanding​ queer – Section scalar processes thatproduce ‘acceptable’ citizens, identitiesandbodies. Section 5: trans geographies Section Carl Bonner-Thompson et al. 30 bodies, affect and emotion bodies, intended ‘hate crime’ friendly’ city-​ and often 31

Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 18:48 23 Sep 2021; For: 9781315164748, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315164748-4 more support isneeded toallowmore voices support thesemarginalized toemerge, thevoices ofthosewho identities. Lookingforward, this isabroader issuethanjustwhoiswriting. Institutionally, not justonthecontentofher research itselfbut thevery existenceoftranspeopleasviable withthis who have​ forengaging work – criticism beenmetwithsignificantpersonal tile response thatthistypeofresearch garners. Hines (2018)isamongthefeministscholars 1993). Arguably, ofthereason why part solittlehasbeendoneby transpeopleisthehos- Many have aview of critiqued ‘nothing aboutuswithout us’ indisabilitiesstudies(Shakespeare 2018b). (Hines2018; genderbinaries identities andbodiesthrough thereinforcement Johnston ofrigid ofcertain Doan (2010)usethespatialexclusionoftransbodiestohighlight themarginalization Crawford’s (2014)framework isamore conceptual, Foucauldian spatialanalysis, bothsheand most (often, cispeople)take forgranted. Doan(2010)calls this ‘the tyranny ofgender’. While in teachingtoapredominantly cis-​ to acknowledge diversity within the community itself, rather than using trans merely as a point must therefore work notjusttoexaminewhattransbodiescanteachusaboutgenderbut also identities can be just as fixed or fluid as those ofcis-​ gender ‘fluidity’, to remember thatthisfluidityappliestoallbodiesandtrans but itiscrucial dered embodiments(Namaste2000). work Current tendstoutilizetransbodiesdemonstrate transitional care, bygen- perceptionsparticular oftransbodiesandtheviolenceexperienced (Hines 2010). and feltexperiences Arguably, suchviews are now seenasproblematic asthey candeny transsubjective, varied lived work on performativity, using trans women’s nature of gender. bodiestoexplainthe constructed contexts ratherthanafixed binary. Butler(1993)talksabouttransbodiesinaforementioned siderable scholarship, anideadependentonarangeoffactors, presentations, embodimentsand chapter (West 1987). andZimmerman con- underpin Ideasofgenderasamalleable construct illuminate genderasanunstable andfluidsocialconstruction, asexplainedinSection2ofthis minating further the waysminating further in which a two-​ moves through spaces, whichhave becomemore difficulttousefollowing hertransition, illu- room, whileDoan(2010)explores how herown transitionimpactedontheways inwhichshe Crawford (2014)addresses themultiple ways thattranspeople encounter the space ofthebath- intherangeofspacesthrough whicheverydayto genderbinaries lives play out. For instance, foregrounding how ofsubjective tounderstand transpeoplelive experiences withandrespond of transpeopleinBrighton, UK. tobethe appears scholarship A commonality intheemerging through toBrowne, NashandHine’s (2010)largerstudiesonthediverse views and identities perspectives;etical and methodological from Doan’s accounts (2010)feministautoethnographic trans lives (Stryker1994). further Trans toencompassamixoftheor- are geographies beginning approaches thatcentre the actualities of only on the body can be voyeuristic othering and risk come tohave onhow bodiesinhabitandmove through spaces(Elliset al. 2014). Accordingly, research exclusively focuses on bodily difference rather than the effect(s) that these differences role intranslives. Within thefield, ofthe therereductive isconsiderable criticism way thatsome people shouldnotbereduced tobodilydifferences, despitethesedifferences playing asignificant of sexualities(Ahmed 2000). geographies outside the Western conceptualizationsthathave withinandoutsidethe dominatedscholarship body ofwork post-​ engaging are, currently, US Anglocentric, althoughthere isgrowing work ontranswomen ofcolouranda As the subfield develops, about trans lives attention to who is writing may further be useful. Poststructuralist thoughtreintroduced of(gender) thebodyasafocusofresearch interms A tensionremains between oftransgeographies. discursive andembodiedtheories Trans From order to chaos: geographies of sexualities colonial approaches gendered tounderstand cultures andhistories gender audience(Johnston 2015). Furthermore, transstudies pronged sex/ ​ 31 gender people (Cornwell 2014). Geographers gender logic structures the spaces that structures gender logic focusing 32

Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 18:48 23 Sep 2021; For: 9781315164748, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315164748-4 ities, contendingthat it: (2017,Murray 6–​ tial andbodilypower relations toadvance queerperspectives. stood, mediatedandfelt. howThe lattermeansunderstanding spa- peoplecanbreak orreform working how withinthefieldcouldpushtounderstand placesimpactonhow sexisunder- of touches, feelingsandembodiedsensations’ 2012, (Morrison 11). Therefore, geographers more on ‘touch’, asthisisstilllargelyabsentfrom work withinthefieldand ‘sexitselfisaseries of push theboundaries ‘acceptable’ . inwhichtodothismightbefocus A way workgeographers tochallenge ‘squeamish’ andcontinually queerandfeministepistemologies vis therelationships thatthesehave withplace. Binnie(inSkeggs et al. 2004)suggestedthat for acareful appreciation ofthemessinesssexual and genderidentitiesbodiesvis-​ engagement with thefieldisneed pointforthoseconsidering and suggestthatastarting linist, heteronormative and sexist power remain structures intact. We with this sentiment agree Johnston (2014)have arguedthat, inspiteofaproliferation onbodies, ofscholarship mascu- sexualities mightcontinue totrouble heteronormative knowledge production. and Longhurst By meansofaconclusion, we wishtohighlightsomeoftheways of inwhichthegeographies housing (Serano 2007). conditions, poverty, andalackof, alackofparental support orlimitedaccessto, healthcare and all kinds of educational and employment livingdisproportionately face precarious barriers, eration oftherole oftechnology inassemblages thatare generative andsexualities. ofgenders 2017). Many ofthetopicscovered inthischaptercouldberevisited through consid- greater sex,exploring sexualityanddesire (Cockayne throughtechnologies andRichardson emerging Place andCulturespecialissueentitled ‘Queer Code/​ provides an interesting technologies. interest way indigital the rising to understand A nonhuman ‘things’ in constituting sexual subjectivities requires investigation. further This also always increasing, entangledinoursexualities. becomingfurther Therefore, of theimportance through singular bodiesbutformed multiple ones. The presence inourlives oftechnologies is flesh anddesire are profiles. assembled by genderandsexualityinGrindr Subjectivities are not use Grindr, through spaces. theirengagementwithdigital Heexplores how locations, skin, by how assemblage tounderstand informed masculinityandsexualityemergeformenwho in oppositionbut work incombinationto shapeeveryday lives. Bonner-​ ​ and bodiescanbeappreciated alongside theirsocialandculturalmeaning – places, ratherthanbeingpre- ​ theviscosityofbodies,understanding we how canunderstand subjectivities emergethrough and affectsthatmake sexualitiesmeaningfulthrough everyday lived ofplaces. experiences By Assemblage ofthemultiple ispotentially usefulinenabling bodies, understanding objects Assemblage can also be deemed to be important to the futureAssemblage of the field. canalsobe deemed to be important ​ Nashand Gorman- not pre-​ these assemblages asevents, non-​ Might help us toexplainwhatplacesandwhy, whatsubjectsandwhy, andtoconsider (and recursively) inandthrough formulated place. thatareliferation ofsexualitiesandgenders nevertheless unbounded, whiletentatively bodies, non-​ given but are a ‘sexuality/​ human actants, objects, ideas, capitalandconstituting, we canhope, apro- 7) recently called for closer attention to assemblage in terms ofurbansexual- 7) recently calledforcloserattentiontoassemblage interms Section 6: future of sexualities Section geographies given andbounded. Inthissense, thefleshy physiology ofpeople Carl Bonner-Thompson et al. binding andephemeral. Identityandsubjectivity are gender’ comingintobeing through the viscosity of 32 Space’ questionsin raisesimportant Thompson (2017)is they donotexist Gender, à-​ 33

Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 18:48 23 Sep 2021; For: 9781315164748, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315164748-4 all toooftenentrappedwithin. and sexism, whilenotforgettingtheneoliberalprocesses thatsuchgeographical are processes power andchallengeintersecting relations ofableism, classism, homophobia, racism tocombatnormative offeminist andqueerepistemologies build onandpushattheboundaries tinue disruptive agendas, multiple dimensionsmust beconsidered. The field must continually world beyond the West. moment. ofsexualitiesareThe geographies atanimportant To con- a difficult, yetnecessary, process ifgeography isto be refinedinitsabilitiestoanalysethesocial thewaysmean radicallychanging andsexualities; inwhichthoseofusthefieldseegenders the Global North (Silvathe GlobalNorth and Vieira 2014). Adopting anon-​ 2007). Queer, by some, asacolonialtool, isunderstood reproducing of theepistemologies risk ofcomplicityinneo-​ sexualities indifferent timesandplacesa renders concept. Notacknowledging andunpackinghow Western are usedtounderstand categories of thediscipline. The word ‘queer’, forexample, inmany isitselfunderstood placesasa Western the fieldhaslargelybeena Whiteand Anglophoneproject until recent years, aswithotherparts the West. ofsexualitiesare todecolonizethegeographies continuing, Efforts recognizing that However, thesedevelopments of andepistemologies shouldbefocusednotonlyoncategories work inthismannerwillenable awiderpopulousofvoices tochallengeheteronormativity. (Johnstonand theways orresist 2015). genderbinaries inwhichthesecanconform Diversifying dressing andothersubjectivities, whichtellsusmore abouthow placesare brought intobeing Binnie, J., andG. Valentine. 1999. ​ ofSexuality – “Geographies Binnie, J. 2016. andLGBTQPolitics QueerRegionality inEurope.”“Critical Gender, PlaceandCulture 23 Binnie, J. 1997. “Coming OutofGeography: Towards aQueerEpistemology.”Bell, D., EnvironmentandPlanningD: andG. Valentine. 1995. MappingDesire: Geographies ofSexualities. London: Routledge. Bell, D., J. Binnie, J. Cream, andG. Valentine. 1994. “All HypedUpandNoPlacetoGo.” Gender, Placeand Bell, D. 2007. “Fucking Geography, Again.” In: Geographies ofSexualities: Theory, Practice andPolitics,edited Beasley, C., M. Holmes, andH. Brook. 2015. “Heterodoxy: OrthodoxiesAhmed, about Heterosexuality.” Challenging S. 2000. Strange Encounters: EmbodiedOthersinPost-​ Adler, S., andJ. Brenner. 1992. “Gender andSpace: LesbiansandGay MenintheCity.” Journal International Binnie, J., andG. Valentine. 1999. ​ ofSexuality – “Geographies Bell, D., andG. Valentine, eds. 1995. MappingDesire: Geographies ofSexualities. London: Routledge. Bonner-​ Brown, G. 2008. “Ceramics, ClothingandOther Bodies: Affective ofHomoerotic Geographies Cruising Johnston, L. 2015. “Gender andSexualityI: Genderqueer Geographies?” ProgressinHumanGeography 40 62 doi:10.1080/​0966369X.2015.1136812. 1631– ​1642. (11): Society andSpace15(2): 223–​ Culture 1(1): 31–​ by K. Browne, J. LimandG. Brown, 81–​ Sexualities 18(5–​ 16(1):of UrbanandRegionalResearch 24–​ To destabilizethefield, further we must considertheproliferation oftrans, intersex, drag, cross-​ Encounters.” Social& 9(8): 915–​ 0966369X. inNewcastle-​ Grid Grindr Geography 23(2): 175– ​ doi:10.1177/​0309132515592109. 668–​678. (5): Geography 23(2): 175–​ Thompson, C. 2017. “‘The MeatMarket’: Production andRegulationofMasculinitiesonthe 6): 681–​ 47. doi:10.1080/​ 187. doi:10.1177/​ 187. doi:10.1177/​ 697. doi:10.1177/​ From order to chaos: geographies of sexualities upon-​ 237. doi:10.1068/​ Tyne, UK.” Gender, PlaceandCulture24(11): 1611–​ 09663699408721199. 88. Surrey: Ashgate. Key readings 030913259902300202. 030913259902300202. 34. doi:10.1111/​ References 1363460714561714. d150223. 33 932. coloniality. London: Routledge. j.1468-​ of Progress.”A Review ProgressinHuman ofProgress.”A Review ProgressinHuman White andnon-​ 2427.1992.tb00463.x. Western view may (Puar 1625. doi:10.1080/​ 34

Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 18:48 23 Sep 2021; For: 9781315164748, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315164748-4 Johnston, L. 2017. “Gender andSexualityII: Activism.” ProgressinHumanGeography 41(5): 648–​ Johnston, L. 2015. “Gender andSexualityI: Genderqueer Geographies?.” ProgressinHumanGeography 40 Johnston, L. 2012. “Sites ofExcess: The Spatial Politics of Touch forDragQueensin Aotearoa New Hines, S. 2010. Negotiationsof “Queerly Situated?Exploring Trans QueerSubjectivities at Work and Haritaworn, J. 2010. “Queer Injuries: The RacialPolitics of ‘Homophobic HateCrime’ inGermany.” Social Gray, M.L., C.R. Johnson, and B.J. Gilley. 2016. Gray, E. 2011. “‘I Just MadeLove’ App LetsUsers Track Their SexualEncounters.” Huffpostonline. Available at: ​ Gorman- Ellis, S.J., J. McNeil, and L. Bailey. 2014. “Gender, Stage of Transition and Situational Avoidance: A UK Duggan, L. 2003. TheNewHomonormativity: The SexualPoliticsofNeoliberalism. Durham, NC: Duke Doan, P.L. 2010. “The Tyranny​ ofGendered Spaces – Davidson, J., andC. Milligan. 2004. “Embodying EmotionSensingSpace: Introducing Emotional Crawford, L.C. 2014. “Derivative Plumbing: Redesigning Washrooms, Bodies, and Trans Affects in Ds+r’s Cornwell, S. 2014. ofGender? “Recognising theFullSpectrum Transgender, andtheFutures Intersex of Corber, R.J., andS. Valocchi. 2003. QueerStudies: An Interdisciplinary Reader.Collins, London: P.H., Blackwell. andS. Bilge. 2016. Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity Press. Cockayne, D.G., andL. Richardson. 2017. Code/​ “Queering Castells, M. 1983. TheCityandtheGrassroots. London: Edward Arnold. Butler, J. 1993. Bodies That Matter: OntheDiscursive LimitsofSex.New York: Routledge. Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: FeminismandtheSubversion ofIdentity. New York: Routledge. Burgess, E.W. 1929. “Urban Areas.” In: Chicago: , inSocialScienceResearch An Experiment editedby T.V. Smith Browne, K., C.J. Nash, andS. Hines. 2010. “Introduction: Towards Trans Geographies.” GenderPlace and Browne, K. 2006. QueerGeographies.”“Challenging Antipode38(5): 885–​ Browne, K., andJ. Lim. 2010. “Trans Lives inthe ‘Gay Capital’ oftheUK.” Gender, PlaceandCulture17(5): Hubbard, P., andE. Wilkinson. 2015. “Welcoming the World? Hospitality, Homonationalism, andthe Hopkins, P. 2017. “ I: Intersectionality.” Progressin . doi:10.1177/​ Hines, S. 2018. “Trans andFeminist RightsHave BeenFalselyCastinOpposition.” Economist , 13July. Browne, K. 2007. “A Party with Politics? Spaces in Dublin and Brighton.” (Re)making LGBTQ Pride doi:10.1177/​0309132515592109. 668–​678 . (5): Zealand.” Emotion, SpaceandSociety 5(1): 1–​ Within Community Spaces in the UK.” Justice 37(1): 69–​ Press. YEaCQ8Q. us=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvLnVrLw&guce_​referrer_​cs=K-YuROa-​qwP7fV2 www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/​i-just-made-love-​entry/ ​app_n_1158266?guccounter=1&guce_referrer_ Cultural Geography 10(4): 441–​ 14681994.2014.902925. Study of Trans People’s Experiences.” SexualandRelationship Therapy 29(3): 351–​ University Press. Geographies.” SocialandCultural Geography 3(4): 523–​ Brasserie.” ofHomosexuality61(5): Journal 621–​ .” 0966369X.2017.1339672. and L. White, 46–​ Culture 17(5): 573–​ doi:10.1080/ ​0966369X.2010.503118. 615–​633. doi:10.1177/​0309132516659569. London 2012Olympics.” 47(3):​ 598– 0309132517743677. www.economist.com/​have-​open-future/​2018/07/13/trans-and-feminist-rights- ​been- ​cast-in-opposition. ​falsely- at: Available 0966369X.2010.503116. Gender, PlaceandCulture17(5): 635–​ Sexual Codes and Digital Technologies.” Social andCultural Geography 8(1): 63–​ j.1467-​8330.2006.00483.x. Murray, A. 2009. “Intimate Mobilities: EmotionalEmbodimentandQueerMigration.” Socialand 89. 69. Chicago, IL: University ofChicago Press. 577. doi:10.1080/​ Feminist Theology 20(3): 236–​ 460. doi:10.1080/​ Carl Bonner-Thompson et al. 654. doi:10.1080/​ 0966369X.2010.503104. 87. doi:10.1080/​ Gender, Place and Culture 24 (1): 1642–​ Gender, Place and Culture 17 (5): 597–​ Queering the Countryside.Queering New York: New York University 9. doi:10.1016/​ 635. doi:10.1080/​ 615. doi:10.1111/​ 34 14649360902853262. 241. doi:10.1177/​ Reflectionsfrom Beyond theGenderDichotomy.” 532. doi:10.1080/​ 0966369X.2010.503121. 1469360701251817. j.emospa.2010.02.003. Space: The Co-​ 00918369.2014.865475. anti.12082. 0966735012436895. 1464936042000317677. production ofSocio-​ 1658. doi:10.1080/​ 893. doi:10.1111/​ 613. doi:10.1080/​ 364. doi:10.1080/​ 656. ​

35

Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 18:48 23 Sep 2021; For: 9781315164748, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315164748-4 Kehl, K. 2018. “ Johnston, L. 2018b. “Gender andSexualityIII: Places.” Precarious ProgressinHumanGeography. doi:10.1177/​ Johnston, L. 2018a. Transforming Gender, Sex, andPlace: Gender Variant Geographies: (Gender, Spaceand Namaste, V. 2000. Morrison, C.-​ Misgav, C., andL. Johnston. 2014. Dancing:“Dirty of The (Non)FluidEmbodiedGeographies Loyd, B., andL. Rowntree. 1978. “Radical Feminists andGay MeninSanFrancisco: SocialSpacein Longhurst, R., and L. Johnston. 2014. “Bodies, Gender, PlaceandCulture: 21 Years On.” Gender, Placeand Lim, J. 2007. andthePolitics“Queer Critique of Affect.” In: Geographies ofSexualities: Theory,Levine, M.P. Practices and 1979. Gay Men: The Sociology ofMaleHomosexuality . New York: Row. and Harper Pilkey, B. 2014. Heteronormativity atHome:“Queering OlderGay andthe Londoners Peake, L. 2016. “Classics inHumanGeography: David BellandGill Valentine (eds)(1995)Mapping Oswin, N. 2008. andtheUsesofSexuality: Geographies “Critical QueerSpace.” Deconstructing Progress Oswin, N. 2004. “Towards ofComplicitQueerFutures.” RadicalGeographies ACME: E-​ An International Nash, H.J, and A.​ Gorman- Nast, H.J. 2002. “Queer , QueerRacisms, International.” Antipode34(5): 874–​ Seidman, S. 1995. Queer “Deconstructing ortheUnder-​ Theory Puar, J. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: HomonationalisminQueer .Times Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Puar, J. 2006. “Mapping USHomonormativities.” Gender, PlaceandCulture13(1): 76–​ Shakespeare, T. 1993. “Disabled People’s Self-​ Serano, J. 2007. Whipping : A Transsexual on the Sexism and Scapegoating of . Berkeley, Taylor, Y., andR. Snowdon. 2014. Religion, Queering ReligiousQueers. New York: Routledge. Stryker, S. 1994. “My Words to Victor Frankenstein Above the Stryker, S.,Village ofChamounix: Performing andS. Whittle. 2006. The Transgender StudiesReader. New York: Routledge. Smart, M.J., and A.H. Whittemore. 2016. in “There Goes the Gayborhood? and Clustering Dispersion Skeggs, B., L. Moran, P. Tyer, andJ. Binnie. 2004. “Queer asFolk: Producing theRealofUrbanSpace.” Silva, M. J., andP.J. Vieira. 2014. ofSexualitiesinBrazil:“Geographies Between NationalInvisibility and 0309132517731256. Society series). London: Routledge. 14649365.2014.916744. a QueerNightclubin Tel Aviv.” SocialandCultural Geography 15(7): 730–​ New York: McGraw Hill. Communities.”Dispersed In: InvitationtoGeography, editedby D. andR. Lanegran Palm, 78–​ Culture 21(3): 267–​ Politics, editedby K. Browne, J. LimandG. Brown, 267–​ doi:10.1177/​1363460717748621. Space andSociety5(1): 10–​ Negotiation ofDomesticMateriality.” Gender, PlaceandCulture21(9): 1142–​ 0309132515585060. Desire: ofSexualities.” Geographies in HumanGeography 32(1): 89–​ Geographies 3(2): forCritical Journal 79–​ and the Inclusion of ‘LGBT Other’ in Swedish Nationalist Discourses.” Assemblage Thinking.” of Chicago Press. 09663690500531014. 0966369X.2013.832659. CA: Seal Press. University Press.Cambridge Ethical.” In: Transgender Rage.” GLQ: ofLesbianandGayA Journal Studies1(3): 237– ​ doi:10.1177/​0042098016650154. a Gay andLesbianRealEstateMarket inDallas, TX, 1986–​ Urban Studies41(9): 1839–​ doi:10.1111/​gec3.12165. 767–​777. Subordinate InclusioninPostcolonial Networks ofKnowledge Production.” Geography Compass8(10): and Society8(3): 249–​ A. 2012. “Heterosexuality andHome: IntimaciesofSpaceandSpaces Touch.” Emotion, ‘In Sweden, Girlsare Allowed toKissGirls, andBoys are Allowed toKissBoys’: Järva Pride Social : Beyond Identity Politics, edited by L. Nicholson, 116–​ Invisible Lives: The Erasure of Transsexual and Transgendered People. Chicago, IL: University 278. doi:10.1080/​ 264. doi:10.1080/​ Gender, PlaceandCulture34(5): 874–​ From order to chaos: geographies of sexualities Murray. 2017. “Sexualities, Subjectivities andUrbanSpaces: A Casefor 18. doi:10.1016/​ 1856. doi:10.1080/​ 103. doi:10.1177/​ 0966369X.2014.897220. Progress inHumanGeography 40(4): 574–​ 86. 02674649366780261. organisation: A New Social Movement?” j/​ emospa.2010.09.001. 0042098042000243183. 35 0309132507085213. 278. London: Routledge. 909. doi:10.1111/​ 2012.” UrbanStudies54(3): 600– ​ theorization of theSocialand theorization 254. Sexualities 21 (4): 674–​ 1467-​ 1157. doi:10.1080/ 746. doi:10.1080/​ 578. doi:10.1177/​ Disability, Handicap 8330.00281. 88. doi:10.1080/​ 141. Cambridge: 909. 691. 615. 88. ​ 36

Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 18:48 23 Sep 2021; For: 9781315164748, chapter3, 10.4324/9781315164748-4 West, C., andD.H. Zimmerman. 1987. “Doing Gender.” GenderandSociety1(2): 125–​ Weightman, B.A. 1981. “Commentary: Towards aGeography oftheGay Community.” ofCultural Journal Waitt, G., andE.R. Stanes. 2015. “Sweating Bodies: Men, Masculinities, Affect, Emotion.” Geoforum59: Valentine, G, R.M. Vanderbeck, J. Sadgrove, J. Andersson, andK. Ward. 2016. “Transnational Valentine, Religious G. 2007. andResearching Intersectionality:“Theorizing A ChallengeforFeminist Geography.” Geography 1(2): 106–​ doi:10.1016/​j.geoforum.2014.12.001. 30–​38. doi:10.1111/​j.1475-5661.2012.00507.x. 50– ​64. 38: Geographers the InstituteofBritish Networks: Power SexualityandtheChanging ofthe Geometries Anglican Community.” Transactions of Professional Geographer 59(1): 10–​ 112. doi:10.1080/​ 21. doi:10.1111/​ Carl Bonner-Thompson et al. 08873638109478645. 36 j.1467-​ 9272.2007.00587.x. 151.