Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management Saugus River Water Budget and Instream Flow Study Prepared By: Gomez and Sullivan Engineers and Environmental Scientists 55 North Stark Highway Weare, NH 03281 Final Report, June 2002 Executive Summary Background The Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Watershed Initiative North Coastal Basin Team commissioned a study to evaluate the relationship between streamflow regulation in the Saugus River and aquatic habitat needs. The Saugus River is a small coastal stream located north of Boston, MA. The watershed is approximately 23.3 square miles. The Saugus River is located in an urban area and has been impacted by human activities for over 300 years. Several public water supply sources are located in the Saugus River Basin. Most of the water removed from the river directly, or indirectly from groundwater sources and ponds does not return to the basin, rather it is discharged out of basin to wastewater treatment facilities. In addition, development has altered wetlands, culverted the river beneath major roads, and placed barriers such as dams across the river. Surface water features in the watershed are manipulated for flood control. The magnitude and timing of river flow has been altered as a result of these human activities. Despite its location in a heavily developed urban area, large tracts of open space remain along the river corridor, including golf courses, state reservations, a national park, and vast areas of protected wetlands. Available data suggest the river water quality is suitable to maintain a warm-water fishery and an inspection shows that fish passage is available along the approximately five river miles from the fresh-water limit near the Saugus Ironworks to the Lynn Water and Sewer Commission Diversion Dam1 at the Sheraton golf course in Wakefield. Historic records indicate a once-prolific alewife run took place in the Saugus River annually. Recent surveys show a lack of a thriving fish population in the river, however. This study determined that although natural flow conditions probably did not provide optimal fish habitat, improvements to the timing and magnitude of flow could be made to increase fish populations in the river as well as improve water quality. The impacts of past human development cannot be undone; water resources must be reasonably allocated among human and environmental needs. Opportunities exist to improve aquatic habitat by managing river flow. Even modest modifications toward the natural flow regime (such as maintaining seasonal minimum flows throughout the year) may result in vast improvements in fish populations and habitation of the river. This in turn will support a healthy watershed ecosystem. Understanding Hydrology- Regulated Flow and Estimated Unregulated Flow This study examined the interrelationships between numerous water withdrawals in the basin and the resulting impact on the timing, magnitude and frequency of regulated flow in the Saugus River. Annual Water Use reports were obtained from each registered and permitted water withdrawal in the basin2 regulated by the Massachusetts Water Management Act for the period between 1994 and 1999. The monthly data for this 5-year period was displayed in various figures to understand the timing, magnitude and duration of withdrawals throughout the year. The quantified water withdrawal data, in conjunction with flow data recorded at a United States Geological Survey (USGS) gage near the Saugus Ironworks, was used to estimate virgin or 1 The Diversion Dam impounds water such that Lynn Water and Sewer Commission can divert water to Hawkes Pond, which is one LWSC’s four water supply reservoirs. 2 There are four registered withdrawals in the basin: Lynn Water and Sewer Commission, Lynnfield Center Water District, Sheraton Colonial Golf Course, Wakefield Water Department. Saugus River Study i Final Report “natural” flow conditions in the Saugus River. Comparisons between the regulated and virgin flow conditions were conducted to understand how human activities affect streamflow. The findings indicate that the Saugus River flow is affected during low flow periods in the summer and during certain periods in the fall and spring, when water suppliers are attempting to refill their storage reservoirs. The Saugus River flow is not grossly affected during extremely high runoff periods, as the quantity of water withdrawn from the watershed is minimal compared to the magnitude of runoff. LWSC’s large storage reservoirs offer operational flexibility for the timing of water withdrawals from the Saugus River; however, the slope and capacity of its diversion channel limits the rate and optimal management of its withdrawals. Instream Flow Study to Determine Minimum Flows needed for Aquatic Habitat In addition to estimating virgin flow conditions in the watershed, a habitat analysis was conducted for the purpose of developing minimum flow recommendations below the LWSC Diversion Dam3. Currently, LWSC is not required to maintain a continuous flow below the Diversion Dam and thus flow below the dam can be reduced to leakage. The lack of water below the Diversion Dam has an impact on the aquatic resources in this reach. An instream flow study (IFIM-instream flow incremental methodology) was conducted to quantify the relationship between flow and fish/macroinvertebrate habitat between the Diversion Dam and the USGS gage on the Saugus River (near the Saugus Ironworks in Saugus, MA)4. A detailed habitat map of the river was prepared from the Diversion Dam to the Saugus River USGS gage- a total of five river miles. The habitat mapping consisted of segmenting the Saugus River into habitat types of riffles, runs and pools. The breakdown of habitat types in the inventoried reach was as follows: 5.7% riffles, 93.0% runs, and 1.3% pools. The Saugus River is generally a slow moving stream comprised mostly of 1-2 foot deep runs with silt/sand substrates. There are limited riffle reaches, which are typically the most productive (in terms of food production for fish) habitat types. Using the habitat maps, an instream flow study was conducted within two reaches of the Saugus River- one just below the LWSC Diversion Dam and the other downstream of Route 1 (referred to throughout the report as the Staples Reach). The upper reach near the LWSC Diversion has a relatively steep slope and consists of riffle/run sequences. In general velocities were high, depths low and the substrate was primarily sand, gravel and cobble. In contrast, the Staples Reach consists of slower moving riffles and runs and substrates were primarily sandy. These two reaches included the majority of riffles in the inventoried river. It is believed that if suitable aquatic habitat is maintained in the riffles, the remainder of the river will contain suitable habitat conditions. Field data (flow, depth, velocity, substrate) was collected in these two reaches to develop hydraulic models. The hydraulic models were used to predict depth and velocities in each reach 3 The Diversion Dam is located in Wakefield below Reedy Meadows, a large wetland complex. The drainage area at the Diversion Dam is approximately 10.5 square miles. The Diversion Dam is the only dam on the Saugus River mainstem from the ocean to the base of Lake Quannapowitt. 4 The USGS gage is located upstream of the Saugus River’s confluence with salt water. Saugus River Study ii Final Report over a range of flow conditions observed in the Saugus River. The hydraulic data was used in conjunction with fish preference curves (fish have certain preferences for depth, velocity and substrate) to estimate the quantity of fish habitat over a range of flows. A relationship between flow and fish habitat was developed for each of four species and life stage of fish plus macroinvertebrates were examined as part of this study. The flow yielding the most habitat for a given species and life stage of fish was quantified (alewife habitat was evaluated qualitatively since preference curves are not available for this species). Flows necessary to maintain at least 80% of the optimal habitat for all life stages of each target species were identified. The instream flow study was one tool used to estimate flow needs for aquatic resources below the LWSC Diversion Dam. United States Fish and Wildlife Service- Aquatic Base Flow Policy In addition to the habitat study, the natural flow yield of the Saugus River Basin was examined to determine if the flow needs resulting from the instream flow study could be supported from the natural flow in the basin. The natural flow at the Saugus River USGS gage and at the LWSC Diversion Dam was computed and compared against the United States Fish and Wildlife Services’ (USFWS) Aquatic Base Flow Policy (ABF). Typically, the USFWS recommends that minimum flows be equivalent to the August median flow (during the summer), which is based on an unregulated river system. When no site-specific study is conducted or long-term record (25 years or greater) is available, the USFWS recommends a minimum flow equivalent to 0.50 cfs per square mile of drainage area. The estimated unregulated Saugus River flow at the gage is rather short (6 years)5, however, recognizing the limited period of record, the Saugus River has a lower August median flow per square mile of drainage area (0.20 cfs per square mile of drainage area), when compared to the ABF Policy (0.50 cfs per square mile of drainage area). Minimum Flow Recommendations at the LWSC Diversion Dam Taking into account the physical landscape of the basin above the Diversion Dam, the natural hydrology of the watershed, the results of the instream flow study and the timing of the alewife run, shown in the table below is the recommended minimum flows for the LWSC Diversion Dam. 5 It should be noted that this 6 year period was considered drier than the long-term average based on precipitation data.
Recommended publications
  • Massachusetts Rivers Alliance
    March 11, 2011 Kate Renahan U.S. EPA-Region 1, Office of the Regional Administrator 5 Post Office Square-Suite 100, Mail Code-ORA01-1 Boston, MA 02109-3912 Subject: Comments on EPA’s proposed General Permits for Stormwater Discharges From Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems in Massachusetts Interstate, Merrimack and South Coastal Watersheds. Dear Ms. Renahan: The Massachusetts Rivers Alliance (the Alliance) is pleased to offer comments on EPA’s proposed General Permits for Stormwater Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems in Massachusetts Interstate, Merrimack and South Coastal Watersheds (the Draft Permit). The mission of the Alliance is to protect and restore rivers in Massachusetts. We represent 32 conservation groups around the state, as well as individual members. Our comments are based on our review of the Draft Permit, its Appendices and Fact Sheet, along with information we have learned by attending EPA’s public meetings on the Draft Permit and participating in the state’s ongoing Sustainable Water Management Initiative (the Initiative). Why Stormwater Management Matters We are commenting on the Draft Permit because stormwater is now the largest source of pollution to rivers, streams and other waters in Massachusetts. In addition, urbanization – and the attendant increases in impervious cover - increases the volume and peak discharge rate of stormwater runoff, which damages stream habitat and results in urban stream syndrome a condition where aquatic life, as a designated use, is not supported. Specifically, increased stormwater runoff erodes river and stream channels, scours streambeds, and buries fish and insect habitat under sediment. Recent work by USGS and MA Department of Fish and Game confirm the findings of other studies that the ecological health of streams, in this instance the structure and diversity of the fluvial fish community, is strongly associated with the percent of impervious cover in the contributing drainage area.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment for the Industri-Plex Superfund Site Town of W Oburn, Middlesex County, Massachusetts
    Rest oration Plan and Environmental Asses sment for the Industri-Plex Superfund Site Draft for Public Review February 19, 2020 Prepared by: Industri-Plex NRDAR Trustee Council Commonwealth of Massachusetts U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration With support from: Abt Associates 6130 Executive Boulevard Rockville, MD 20852 Abt Associates Report Title Insert Date ▌1-1 This page intentionally left blank Industri-Plex RP/EA February 19, 2020 ▌i CONTENTS CONTENTS List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. vi 1. Introduction to the Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment ..................... 1 1.1. Trustee Responsibilities and Authorities ................................................................. 1 1.2. Summary of Industri-Plex NRDAR Settlement ........................................................ 2 1.3. Summary of Natural Resource Injuries ................................................................... 2 1.4. Purpose and Need for Restoration .......................................................................... 4 1.5. Restoration Goals ...................................................................................................4 1.6. Coordination and Scoping ....................................................................................... 4
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Inventory
    Town of Saugus Historical Commission Town Hall 298 Central Street Saugus, MA 01906 CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY Updated: May 2012 The Town of Saugus contains hundreds of sites and structures having architectural, archeological, or historical significance. At the present time, five properties are listed on the National Register of Historic Places, two of which have been designated as National Historic Landmarks (NHL) by the Secretary of the Interior. National Register Properties: Boardman House (NHL, 10/15/1966) Breakheart Reservation Parkways (8/11/2003) Lynn Fells Parkway (5/9/2003) Saugus Iron Works (NHL, 10/15/1966) Saugus Town Hall (6/20/1985) The Commission completed an Inventory of Cultural and Historical Resources in 1986. This inventory was largely confined to resources that were at least 50 years old, and did not include many additional resources reflecting the growth of the Town since World War II. The results of this inventory have been entered into the Massachusetts Historical Commission’s MACRIS database. With a few exceptions, the inventory forms, along with inventory records created by other federal and state agencies, are available for downloading from the MACRIS site (http://mhc-macris.net/). The following listing is in two parts. The first lists properties included in the MACRIS database, while the second shows those properties which the Commission has identified for potential inclusion in the inventory. This includes both older properties not included in the previous inventory and those which have achieved the 50 year age criteria since the initial survey was done. It should be noted that the list of potential additions will expand as individual properties within areas are inventoried or miscellaneous residential properties are identified as being significant either as architecture or association.
    [Show full text]
  • Ffy 2019 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Per 23 Cfr 450.334
    FFY 2019 ANNUAL LISTING OF OBLIGATED PROJECTS PER 23 CFR 450.334 Agency ProjInfo_ID MassDOT _Project Description▼ Obligation FFY 2019 FFY 2019 Remaining Date Programmed Obligated Federal Advance Federal Fund Fund Construction Fund REGION : BERKSHIRE MassDOT 603255 PITTSFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, P-10-049, LAKEWAY DRIVE OVER ONOTA 10-Jul-19 $2,919,968.00 $2,825,199.25 Highway LAKE MassDOT 606462 LENOX- RECONSTRUCTION & MINOR WIDENING ON WALKER STREET 15-Apr-19 $2,286,543.00 $2,037,608.80 Highway MassDOT 606890 ADAMS- NORTH ADAMS- ASHUWILLTICOOK RAIL TRAIL EXTENSION TO ROUTE 21-Aug-19 $800,000.00 $561,003.06 Highway 8A (HODGES CROSS ROAD) MassDOT 607760 PITTSFIELD- INTERSECTION & SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT 9 LOCATIONS ALONG 11-Sep-19 $3,476,402.00 $3,473,966.52 Highway SR 8 & SR 9 MassDOT 608243 NEW MARLBOROUGH- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, N-08-010, UMPACHENE FALLS 25-Apr-19 $1,281,618.00 $1,428,691.48 Highway OVER KONKAPOT RIVER MassDOT 608263 SHEFFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, S-10-019, BERKSHIRE SCHOOL ROAD OVER 20-Feb-19 $2,783,446.00 $3,180,560.93 Highway SCHENOB BROOK MassDOT 608351 ADAMS- CHESHIRE- LANESBOROUGH- RESURFACING ON THE 25-Jun-19 $4,261,208.00 $4,222,366.48 Highway ASHUWILLTICOOK RAIL TRAIL, FROM THE PITTSFIELD T.L. TO THE ADAMS VISITOR CENTER MassDOT 608523 PITTSFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, P-10-042, NEW ROAD OVER WEST 17-Jun-19 $2,243,952.00 $2,196,767.54 Highway BRANCH OF THE HOUSATONIC RIVER BERKSHIRE REGION TOTAL : $20,053,137.00 $19,926,164.06 Wednesday, November 6, 2019 Page 1 of 20 FFY 2019 ANNUAL LISTING OF OBLIGATED PROJECTS PER
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Boston Regional Climate Change Adaptation Strategy - WORKING DRAFT
    Metro Boston Regional Climate Change Adaptation Strategy - WORKING DRAFT - Funding provided by the Federal Sustainable Communities Program and the Barr Foundation Revised June 2015 By: Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place Boston, MA 02111 617.933.0700 www.mapc.org With assistance from: Tellus Institute 11 Arlington St. Boston, MA 02116 Acknowledgements This report was originally produced in June 2014 by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council, and revised on June 1 , 2015 after discussion and approval by the MAPC Executive Committee. Technical assistance was provided by Martin Pillsbury, Environmental Director (Project Manager); Julie Conroy, Senior Environmental Planner (Primary Author); Sam Cleaves, Senior Regional Planner (Author); Bill Wang, GIS Analyst; and Barry Keppard, Public Health Division Manager; James Goldstein, Senior Fellow, Tellus Institute; and William Dougherty, President, Climate Change Research Group. Editing and continued guidance was provided by Marc Draisen, MAPC Executive Director. The Metro-Boston Regional Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (RCCAS) was undertaken with funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Sustainable Communities Program and the Barr Foundation. We would also like to thank the MAPC Officers for their continued support: Lynn Duncan, President; Keith Bergman, Vice President; Shirronda Almeida, Secretary; and Taber Keally, Treasurer. Special appreciation goes to the members of the RCCAS Advisory Committee for their continuous assistance and leadership: John Bolduc Environmental Planner Cambridge Community Development Dept. Wayne Castonguay Executive Director Ipswich River Watershed Assoc. Hunt Durey Acting Director MA Dept. of Ecological Restoration Kwabena Kyei-Aboagye MA Urban Program Manager U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Elevation of the March–April 2010 Flood High Water in Selected River Reaches in Central and Eastern Massachusetts
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Elevation of the March–April 2010 Flood High Water in Selected River Reaches in Central and Eastern Massachusetts Open-File Report 2010–1315 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Elevation of the March–April 2010 Flood High Water in Selected River Reaches in Central and Eastern Massachusetts By Phillip J. Zarriello and Gardner C. Bent Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Open-File Report 2010–1315 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Zarriello, P.J., and Bent, G.C., 2011, Elevation of the March–April 2010 flood high water in selected river reaches in central and eastern Massachusetts: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 40B Or Not to 40B in Saugus Nahant Rallies
    WEDNESDAY, JULY 17, 2019 Nahant Senator sees licensing rallies the undocumented as safe By Thor Jourgensen (RMV) cannot issue a driver’s license to for ITEM STAFF anyone that cannot prove U.S. citizen- ship or lawful presence in the United LYNN — It’s time to shatter nega- States,” Registry spokeswoman Judith wetlands tive myths dogging proposals to allow Reardon Riley said in a statement. undocumented immigrants to obtain Crighton said the Work and Family By Bridget Turcotte driver’s licenses, said state Sen. Bren- Mobility Act would allow an undocu- ITEM STAFF dan Crighton. mented immigrant to bring a passport The Lynn Democrat and state Repre- from their country of origin or obtain NAHANT — Several Nah- sentatives Tricia Farley-Bouvier (Pitts- PHOTO | SHNS documentation from their country’s ant residents boarded a bus eld) and Christine Barber (Somer- consulate and present the documents to the Massachusetts State From left, state Sen. Brendan Crighton, Rep. ville-Medford) support allowing state along with a standard license applica- House Tuesday morning to Tricia Farley-Bouvier and Rep. Christine residents to apply for a standard driv- tion at the RMV. support a bill that would Barber are sponsoring legislation that would er’s license regardless of immigration “They would go through the same change a law that enables allow undocumented immigrants to acquire status. religious and education non- standard Massachusetts driver’s licenses. “The Registry of Motor Vehicles CRIGHTON, A3 pro ts to bypass local envi- ronmental regulations. An act to prevent nonprof- it institutions from avoiding wetlands or natural resource Mother 40B or protections under the so- called Dover Amendment, proposed by State Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport
    EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW AND CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT AT THE WELLS G&H SUPERFUND SITE, WOBURN, MASSACHUSETTS, FROM 1960 TO 1986 AND ESTIMATION OF TCE AND PCE CONCENTRATIONS DELIVERED TO WOBURN RESIDENCES DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree, Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Maura A. Metheny, B.S., M.S. The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Professor E. Scott Bair, Advisor Assistant Professor Anne Carey Approved by Professor Carolyn Merry ______________________________ Professor Franklin Schwartz Advisor Department of Geological Sciences Copyright by Maura A. Metheny 2004 ABSTRACT Contamination of municipal wells G and H was discovered in 1979 and was statistically linked by epidemiological studies to leukemia cases that occurred in Woburn, Massachusetts in the late 1960’s through the early 1980’s. Historical contamination of the buried valley aquifer at the 133 hectare Wells G&H Superfund Site is simulated using MT3D-HMOC code to determine the possible contamination history of the wells with TCE and PCE. A MODFLOW groundwater flow model calibrated using measured heads, measured streamflow gains and losses, and tritium/helium-3 groundwater ages was used to compute flow velocities. The 26-year transient groundwater flow model incorporates realistic pumping schedules and variable recharge rates. Although the wells operated from 1964 to 1979, the transport model spans the period 1960 to 1985 so that the simulated concentrations can be compared to water quality measurements from 1979 through 1985. At least five local sources contributed TCE, PCE, and other contaminants to the groundwater system. The precise contaminant release times and source concentrations are not known for the sites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning of Winchester on Massachusett Land
    Posted at www.winchester.us/480/Winchester-History-Online THE BEGINNING OF WINCHESTER ON MASSACHUSETT LAND By Ellen Knight1 ENGLISH SETTLEMENT BEGINS The land on which the town of Winchester was built was once SECTIONS populated by members of the Massachusett tribe. The first Europeans to interact with the indigenous people in the New Settlement Begins England area were some traders, trappers, fishermen, and Terminology explorers. But once the English merchant companies decided to The Sachem Nanepashemet establish permanent settlements in the early 17th century, Sagamore John - English Puritans who believed the land belonged to their king Wonohaquaham and held a charter from that king empowering them to colonize The Squaw Sachem began arriving to establish the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Local Tradition Sagamore George - For a short time, natives and colonists shared the land. The two Wenepoykin peoples were allies, perhaps uneasy and suspicious, but they Visits to Winchester were people who learned from and helped each other. There Memorials & Relics were kindnesses on both sides, but there were also animosities and acts of violence. Ultimately, since the English leaders wanted to take over the land, co- existence failed. Many sachems (the native leaders), including the chief of what became Winchester, deeded land to the Europeans and their people were forced to leave. Whether they understood the impact of their deeds or not, it is to the sachems of the Massachusetts Bay that Winchester owes its beginning as a colonized community and subsequent town. What follows is a review of written documentation KEY EVENTS IN EARLY pertinent to the cultural interaction and the land ENGLISH COLONIZATION transfers as they pertain to Winchester, with a particular focus on the native leaders, the sachems, and how they 1620 Pilgrims land at Plymouth have been remembered in local history.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Quannapowitt Diagnostic Feasibility Study
    PALIS #93060 LAKE QUANNAPOWITT COM fo) O i I I I I I I I I I LAKE QUANNAPOWITT • DIAGNOSTIC/FEASIBILITY STUDY • Wakefield, Massachusetts FINAL REPORT • July, 1986 i i i i i i i I COM CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. One Center Plaza environmental engineers, scientists, _ „ .. mmo a , , ', Boston, Massachusetts 02108 I planners, & management consultants ' I y 617 742-5151 I July 24, 1986 I Mr. Richard C. Boutiette, P.E. Director of Public Works Town of Wakefield I 1 Lafayette Street Wakefield, MA 01880 I Dear Mr. Boutiette: Please find 12 copies of the addendum to the Final Diagnostic/Feasibility Study for Lake Quannapowitt. One copy has been sent to the Wakefield I Library. This revision to the Final Report completes the work on our contract with the Town of Wakefield for Phase I of the project, and 10 I copies have been sent to the Clean Lakes Section of DEQE. It has been a pleasure working on the project with the Department of Public Works, and we look forward to continuing our good working I relationship with the Town of Wakefield. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call. I Sincerely, I CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC I Eileen Pannetier Project Manager I cc: Chris Duerring, DEQE I I I I I I I ADDENDUM TO FINAL REPORT I DIAGNOSTIC/FEASIBILITY STUDY Lake Quannapowitt, Wakefield, Massachusetts I DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, TOWN OF WAKEFIELD I INTRODUCTION The purpose of this addendum is to address the final comments from the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering (DEQE) on the Lake I Quannapowitt Phase I Diagnostic/Feasibility Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Management Planning Program
    Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Bureau of Planning and Resource Protection Resource Management Planning Program RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Middlesex Fells Planning Unit Middlesex Fells Planning Unit RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2011 Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lt. Governor Richard K. Sullivan Jr., Secretary Edward M. Lambert Jr., Commissioner Dear Friends, Supporters, Users and Stakeholders of the DCR Middlesex Fells Reservation; I am please to introduce you to this draft Resource Management Plan (RMP) for the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation’s Middlesex Fells Reservation. RMPs provide guidelines for management of properties under the stewardship of the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). They are intended to be working documents for setting priorities, enabling the DCR to adapt to changing fiscal, social and environmental conditions. The planning process provides a forum for communication and cooperation with park visitors and the surrounding communities to ensure transparency in the DCR’s stewardship efforts. For more than a century, the Middlesex Fells Reservation has provided visitors a natural oasis in the midst of an urbanized landscape, and an opportunity for visitors to connect with nature. The reservation offers a variety of nature-based recreation activities that are special to the residents of metropolitan Boston and beyond. It is home to ten rare plants and animals, uncommon natural communities, and cultural and historic resources that live as a testament to our agrarian and industrial past. Generations of users have traversed its trails, viewed the Boston skyline from atop its rocky hills, and enjoyed the sound of birdsong echoing through the forest. This RMP strives to balance recreational use and demand with the protection natural and cultural resources at the DCR Middlesex Fells so that these experiences, and others, are available for the generations to come.
    [Show full text]