DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Version.Pages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Faculty of Humanities Assisted Dying in Documentaries A rhetorical analysis of the perspective of three documentaries on assisted dying and their connection to the social and political debate in the countries of production. Terry Pratchett: Choosing to Die (2011) Dignitas, La Mort sur Ordonnance (2010) Nachtvlinder, de laatste dagen van Priscilla (2013) Name: Britt van Teijlingen Supervisor: Dhr. dr. F.A.M. Laeven E-mail: [email protected] Second reader: Dhr. S. Scholz Student number: 10795790 Programme: MA Media Studies: Television and Cross-media Culture University of Amsterdam Date of completion: 26 June, 2015 Table of Contents Preface p. 3 Introduction p. 4 Chapter one: Euthanasia Laws p. 7 Chapter two: Euthanasia Debate p. 10 Chapter thee: Theoretical Framework and Method p. 16 Chapter four: Analysis Terry Pratchett: Choosing to Die p. 23 Chapter five: Analysis Dignitas: La Mort sur Ordonnance p. 35 Chapter six: Analysis Nachtvlinder, de laatste dagen van Priscilla p. 47 Conclusion p. 57 Bibliography p. 61 Appendix one: Segment analysis Terry Pratchett: Choosing to Die p. 65 Appendix two: Segment analysis Dignitas, La Mort sur Ordonnance p. 82 Appendix three: Segment analysis Nachtvlinder, de laatste dagen van Priscilla p. 105 !2 of !114 Preface I would like to thank all those who have contributed to the realization of this thesis. Since it is not possible to thank everyone personally, I will limit myself to those who were most important. First, I would like to thank my supervisor Erik Laeven who has helped me throughout the writing process. His comments and critical eye have helped me constantly to improve my thesis, and his effort and time were very valuable. Secondly, I would like to thank my family and friends for their support, and in particular my partner Tjebbe for his unconditional support, as well as my friend and fellow student Marike for all her help. !3 of !114 Introduction Last year at the IDFA 2014, the International Documentary Festival Amsterdam, multiple documentaries on the topic of euthanasia or assisted suicide were shown. It was striking that most of these documentaries were produced in Belgium and the Netherlands; two countries where euthanasia is legalized. This gave rise to some questions. I wondered if the current situation of assisted dying in Europe triggers filmmakers to deal with this social issue. How is the topic of assisted dying approached in these documentaries, and is this the same for all European countries? I decided to research documentaries on assisted dying to gain insight into what kind of documentaries are produced on this topic and how they are related to the social, political and legal status of assisted dying in the countries of production. Documentaries have always been used to debate social issues and to provide a distinct perspective on those issues (Nichols 19,101). The philosopher Aguayo states that documentary film has demonstrated engagement with audiences and has sometimes prompted critical deliberation and activism (33-34). Documentaries have been a source of agitation in the rising tide of social unrest (Aguayo 33-34). Recently, documentaries have often functioned as a springboard for public argument in practice, according to Aguayo (33-34). Documentaries can be produced in response to a political and social debate. But the documentary itself can contribute to the debate as well. The more closely a documentary film is connected to a social movement, the more effective the documentary is in the process of social change, according to Aguayo (221). Quite often the public debate is put into motion following a provocative documentary. This happened, for example, with the Dutch documentary Dood op Verzoek (Maarten Nederhorst 1993). The debate on euthanasia was going on for some time already, but the government tried to stay out of it as much as possible. The majority of the population supported euthanasia, but it was not allowed according to Dutch law. However, euthanasia already happened in secret. The documentary showed the euthanasia of Cees van Wendel. The film approached it from a very supportive perspective. This was a rather radical move at the time and the documentary therefore received a lot of response, both in the Netherlands and abroad. The documentary is still seen as one of the most important driving forces behind the debate on euthanasia in the Netherlands and abroad (npo.nl). This particular case shows that the perspective of a documentary can be heavily influenced by the social and political debate. But in turn, the documentary itself can also contribute to the debate. Therefore, analyzing documentaries becomes very valuable if we involve the social and political debate in !4 of !114 our research. This knowledge provides a better understanding of the documentary. It also creates the opportunity to place the documentary into a broader context. Especially with documentaries on such a debated topic as assisted dying, we should not separate the documentary from its context. The combination of researching the legal, social and political context of euthanasia and the documentaries dealing with this social issue tells us a lot about the state of affairs on assisted dying in different countries and about the role documentaries can play in such debates. Many analyses of documentaries do not place them in a broader social context, but usually only in the context of other media. Since documentaries and the legal, political and social context often influence each other, it is of scientific interest to include this. Through this research, I hope to provide a different perspective on documentary research and demonstrate the relevance of researching this combination. During this research, three documentaries on assisted dying will be analyzed. However, not all documentaries cover the same form of assisted dying. There are different forms of assisted dying or ending someone’s life through medical treatment. In the case of euthanasia, a physician administers the means of death, usually through a lethal drug. This is only allowed in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. Another way of assisted dying is through assisted suicide. In this case the patient carries out the procedure himself, with the assistance of a physician. This often means that medical staff prepares a lethal drug, like a drink, but the patient has to take it himself. This form of assisted dying is allowed in Japan, Colombia, Albania, Germany, Switzerland and in the American states of Washington, Montana, Oregon, Vermont and New Mexico. With the selection of three Western European countries I will cover all the different legal situations in Europe regarding euthanasia. I will analyze one documentary from each country. I will analyze Terry Pratchett: Choosing to die (2011) from the United Kingdom, Dignitas, La Mort sur Ordonnance (2010) from Switzerland, and Nachtvlinder, de laatste dagen van Priscilla (2013) from the Netherlands. These three were chosen as they are the most recent full-length documentaries on assisted dying. Often in media research, a corpus of older films is chosen which makes it possible to place the analyzed films into the broader media discourse. I chose to research the most recent documentaries because I do not intend to place them in the broader media discourse, but in their legal, political and social context. I wanted to analyze the current social, political and legal situation since this context is constantly changing. And as I witnessed at the IDFA 2014, this current context led to a large amount of documentaries in the past few years. A !5 of !114 corpus of the most recent documentaries is the most suitable for providing information about this current situation. Since assisted dying has been a heavily debated subject in Europe for decades, with a lot of documentaries having been produced on this subject, it is interesting to research what kind of perspective on assisted dying those documentaries provide and how this is related to the legal, political and social situation. Therefore, my research question is: How do documentaries on assisted dying from the United Kingdom, Switzerland and the Netherlands persuade the viewer to adopt a certain perspective on assisted dying and how does this position these documentaries in the social and political debate on assisted dying in the countries where they were produced? To understand how the documentaries position themselves in the social and political debate, I have to set out this debate through a discourse analysis, which is done in chapter two. However, we cannot have a clear view of this debate without knowing the legal situation of assisted dying in the different countries. Therefore, I will first analyze the legal situation regarding assisted dying in the different countries in chapter one. After researching both the legal status and the social and political situation, a hypothesis on the perspectives in the documentaries will be formed in chapter three. In chapter four the theoretical framework and the method for the film analyses will be set out. I will use a rhetorical framework to analyze the different documentaries. I will approach the documentaries in this research as rhetorical instruments that provide a certain argument on assisted dying. However, I am aware that documentaries are certainly not always rhetorical instruments, but for analyzing the perspective of the documentary rhetoric offers a very valuable framework, as will be explained further in chapter four. In chapters five, six and seven the documentaries will be analyzed. Finally I will provide a conclusion in which the findings on the different documentaries will be connected, which will be linked back to how documentaries and the social and political debate are interwoven. In the conclusion the research questions will be answered, and some recommendations for further research will be made. !6 of !114 Chapter one: Euthanasia Laws To analyze how the social debate on euthanasia influenced the documentaries on assisted dying that we will analyze later, the social debate on assisted dying in these countries has to be set out first.
Recommended publications
  • FENA Conversation with Fran

    FENA Conversation with Fran

    FINAL EXIT NETWORK VOL 18 • NO 1 WINTER, JAN/FEB 2019 CONTENTS TTHEHE TIME TO IMPROVE OREGON-STYLE LAWS? .........3 GOODGOOD DEMENTIA ADVANCE DEATHDEATH DIRECTIVES ...........................5 FISCAL YEAR REPORT ............9 SOCIETYSOCIETY AMERICANS ACCEPT FEN EUTHANASIA ..................... 11 A Conversation With Fran By Michael James, FEN Life Member enior Guide Fran Schindler’s voice was raspy after five days of protesting in Washington, DC, but this remarkable 79- Q: year-old’sS enthusiasm for FEN and life in general was loud and clear. “The privilege of someone being What’s going to willing to have me with them when they die, when I happen to you? only just sit with them, is the most meaningful thing I have ever done.” In the late 1980s, Fran faced a series of daunt- ing issues: a brain tumor, divorce, and mysterious A. symptoms which mimicked ALS. She acknowledg- es she became obsessed with finding ways to kill I will get dead. herself during those dark days. Eventually she heard Faye Girsh lecture about FEN. She quickly signed up for training and got her FEN membership card in November 2006. Twelve years later she estimates FRAN continued on page 2 Renew your membership online: www.finalexitnetwork.org FRAN continued from page 1 she’s been present for over 70 individuals who have taken their lives using FEN protocol. “At the FEN training class I discovered a major benefit of being a “Start doing FEN member. I looked at the trainers and my fellow classmates—people who didn’t know me—and real- what you want ized that if I needed them they would be there for me.
  • Toxicological Findings in Helium Deaths 2005-2010 Dawn Reed, LGC Forensics, F5 Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 3ED

    Toxicological Findings in Helium Deaths 2005-2010 Dawn Reed, LGC Forensics, F5 Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 3ED

    2834 - Tox helium deaths tech. poster:1281 - BMSS Poster for Della Shanahan v5.qxd 01/12/2010 09:31 Page 1 Toxicological findings in helium deaths 2005-2010 Dawn Reed, LGC Forensics, F5 Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 3ED Final exit: The practicalities of self-deliverance and assisted suicide for the dying • The drugs available to the individuals are shown in the table below. Derek Humphry assisted his wife in taking a fatal drug overdose after she suffered declining health due to terminal cancer. He wrote the book Final Exit 1 in 1991 as a guide to others in similar situations. Final Exit sparked a debate surrounding Available drug No. of cases self-deliverance, assisted suicide and euthanasia which remains a contentious topic both morally and legally. Antidepressants Chlorpromazine 1 The 3rd edition of Final Exit, which was updated in April 2010 2, contains a comprehensive set of instructions on how to take a Escitalopram 1 life using helium, stating that death should occur in approximately five minutes. The chapter begins by informing the reader to Fluoxetine 1 purchase two cylinders of helium from a toy shop, and that using cash is advisable to avoid later investigations. The process is Mirtazapine 3 Paroxetine 1 described with the aid of diagrams and it is recommended that the 'patient' practices before the final attempt – there is a video Sertraline 1 available to purchase if required. Anti-Psychotics Interestingly, the author discusses the fact that so long as there are no bag marks on the neck, it should be possible to clear Lithium 1 away the bag and cylinder, wait an hour or two and then call for a doctor as if the natural disease state has finally caused the Olanzapine 1 Risperidone 2 individual's inevitable death.
  • Debate on Euthanasia (Pros and Cons)

    Debate on Euthanasia (Pros and Cons)

    UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA PORTUGUESA FACULDADE DE TEOLOGIA MESTRADO INTEGRADO EM TEOLOGIA (1.º grau canónico) JOSEPH PAKHU DEBATE ON EUTHANASIA (PROS AND CONS) Dissertação Final sob orientação de: PROF. FAUSTO GOMEZ, O.P., S.Th.D Lisboa 2015 APPROVAL SHEET DEBATE ON EUTHANASIA (PROS AND CONS) JOSEPH PAKHU, OP Chairman:____________________________________________________________________ Examiner:____________________________________________________________________ Supervisor:____________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGMENT With the writing of this thesis, my time as a USJ student is about to end. At the end of this journey, I have to say “thank you.” I’d like to say “thank you” above all to God, because through his grace and blessing I have managed to accomplish this research paper. Moreover, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the many wonderful people accompanied me and helped me in one way or another throughout these few years as a USJ student. In particular, I wish to thank the USJ Faculty of Religious Studies, its staff, and all the professors who shared their knowledge with us students, including Fr. Fausto Gomez O.P who has supervised me throughout this journey of writing my thesis. I am sincerely thankful to him for his time and generosity. In the second place, I like to thank also all the Dominican priests here in Macau who have walked with me and taken care of my needs as a Dominican Student brother. Also I give many thank, to all my Dominican brothers and sisters as well as to my other classmates. Indeed, it has been a good learning experience with all during these several years. I wish them all the best in your studies and life.
  • The Death of and the -1 Truth About, Euthanasia

    The Death of and the -1 Truth About, Euthanasia

    If someone you care about bought FinaZElxit, you must buy them D~lyComl,assiOn. Derek : The There. You got what you wanted. Ever since I was diagnosed as having cancer, you have done Death of everything conceivable to pre- cipitate my death. I was not alone in recognizing what you were doing. What you Hulll~hrvA did--desertion and abandonment Ann and subsequent harrassment of a dying woman--is so unspeakble there are no words to describe -1 the horror of it. and the Yet you know. And others know too. You will have to live with this untiol you die. Truth About, 1 May you never, ever forget. Euthanasia This is the actual suicide letter left by Ann Humphry. The hand- written note was added by Ann to a copy sent to Rita Marker, author of this book. The letter itself was addressed to Ann's husband, Derek Humphry, co-founder of the Hemlock Society and author of the number-one best-seller Rnal Exit. - '1 MAR 1 t RITA MARKER ISBN 0-688-12223-3 8 ,'\- IF " ISBN 0-688-12221-3 FPT $18.00 wtinuedfiomfiotatjap) ,, Tack Kevorkian. who has written article advocating medical experiments on death row prisoners -while they are still alive. An( she explains the ramifications of euthanasia course is not the same as giving in a country without adequate health insur- doctors the right to kill ance, like America, where people who really their patients on demand. want to live might choose death rather than bankrupt their families. Deadly Compassion is essential reading for anyone who has misgivings about giving DEADLY COMPASSION doctors the right to kill.
  • Freedom to Flourish: a Catholic Analysis of Doctor–Prescribed Suicide and Euthanasia

    Freedom to Flourish: a Catholic Analysis of Doctor–Prescribed Suicide and Euthanasia

    V VERITAS Freedom to Flourish: A Catholic Analysis of Doctor–Prescribed Suicide and Euthanasia Jason B. Negri, JD and Father Christopher M. Saliga, O.P., RN The Veritas Series is dedicated to Blessed Michael McGivney (1852-1890), priest of Jesus Christ and founder of the Knights of Columbus. The Knights of Columbus presents The Veritas Series “Proclaiming the Faith in the Third Millennium” Freedom to Flourish: A Catholic Analysis of Doctor-Prescribed Suicide and Euthanasia by JASON B. NEGRI, JD & FR. CHRISTOPHER M. SALIGA, O.P., RN General Editor Fr. Juan-Diego Brunetta, O.P. Catholic Information Service Knights of Columbus Supreme Council Printed With Ecclesiastical Permission. Most Reverend Earl Boyea November 3, 2010 Diocese of Lansing Copyright ©2011-2021 by Knights of Columbus Supreme Council. All rights reserved. Cover: © 2011-2021 by Knights of Columbus Supreme Council. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Write: Catholic Information Service Knights of Columbus Supreme Council PO Box 1971 New Haven CT 06521-1971 www.kofc.org/cis [email protected] 203-752-4267 800-735-4605 fax Printed in the United States of America CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 5 KILLING TO END SUFFERING?. 6 RATIONALE FOR KILLING . 7 SUFFERING. 9 LOSS OF AUTONOMY . 11 AUTONOMY AND THE CASE OF JO ROMAN . 13 FREEDOM TO FLOURISH . 15 FREEDOM TO FLOURISH: THE CASE OF CHRISTI CHRONOWSKI . 17 CHRISTI’S DIAGNOSIS: A VIRTUAL GUARANTEE OF SUFFERING AND DEATH.
  • The Hemlock Society: What We Are, What We Aren't, and Why

    The Hemlock Society: What We Are, What We Aren't, and Why

    Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development Volume 12 Issue 3 Volume 12, Summer 1997, Issue 3 Article 12 The Hemlock Society: What We Are, What We Aren't, and Why Faye J. Girsh Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/jcred This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE HEMLOCK SOCIETY: WHAT WE ARE, WHAT WE AREN'T, AND WHY FAYE J. GIRSH* According to my count, the position favoring physician-aid-in- dying is outnumbered here eight to three. So, as the wrap-up speaker, I will try to summarize some of the arguments. I do want to note, however, that this eight to three ratio is the oppo- site of what we see in public opinion polls, which show at least 70% support for some form of legalization of physician aid in dying not only in the United States, but in Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Surveys indicate that Americans favor the right by about three to one, 1 and this number is growing, I 2 might add, as every survey comes in. * Executive Director, Hemlock Society USA; Ed.D, Harvard University. Before accept- ing her position as Executive Director of the Hemlock Society USA, Dr. Girsh was a clini- cal and forensic psychologist in San Diego testifying and evaluating litigants in civil and criminal cases, as well as Founder, President and Newsletter Editor of the Hemlock So- ciety of San Diego; President of the San Diego Psych-Law Society and Psychologists in Addictive Behavior; Board Member of KPBS, the public broadcasting station in San Di- ego, and Board Member of several ACLU affiliates, Americans for Death with Dignity and the Euthanasia Research and Guidance Organization.
  • 2020-Winter.Pdf

    2020-Winter.Pdf

    FINAL EXIT NETWORK VOL 19 • NO 1 WINTER 2020 IN THIS ISSUE • A devoted husband’s murder-suicide farewell Page 2 • Mary Ewert: dementia and the growing RTD crisis 4 • How ‘Nora’ easily bequeathed a ‘thank you’ gift 5 • Volunteer Hall still leaves a distinguished mark 6 • Veterinarian has poetic take on peaceful deaths 12 • Grateful clients give voice to the essence of FEN 14 T R A I BULETN TO DELIVERANCE ‘My father shot my mother and then himself because her Alzheimer’s was too advanced for anyone to think she was competent to make a decision.’ By Jay Niver, FEN Editor criminal case,” Janet said. “They don’t cover suicides.” murder-suicide usually makes news. The details were unknown to all but the But when that tragedy involves an close friends and family to whom Bob wrote a elderly, devoted couple – and one or A letter, explaining their choice two days before both of them have debilitating dementia or a he pulled the trigger: first for his wife of more terminal disease – it grabs few headlines. than 60 years; then for himself. Authorities, family, friends, and courts The Shavers, too, had a long and storybook recognize that the victims planned and chose marriage. Alma was 80 and he was 79. It ended their exit because they didn’t have (or know) for them on a warm, Sunday afternoon last another way. June as they lay together on their canopy bed. Richard and Alma Shaver decided upon Some would say it ended such a death. But theirs made news across the for them much country after the Sunday New York Times ran a major feature last Dec.
  • BOD Episode 9 Transcript

    BOD Episode 9 Transcript

    Episode 9–Why should one church decide for all of us? Death with Dignity in Oregon [SUICIDE WARNING] [PRAYER BELL CHIMES] [Ethereal female voice]: There is no death. There is only me, me, me who’s dying. Brittany Maynard, YouTube: I can’t even tell you the amount of relief it provides me to know that I don’t have to die the way it has been described to me that my brain tumour would take me on its own. Andrew Denton: This YouTube video made by a young Californian woman dying of brain cancer has been viewed more than 11 million times. Its impact has been profound. Brittany Maynard: I hope to enjoy however many days I have left on this beautiful earth and spend as much of it outside as I can surrounded by those I love. I hope to pass in peace. Andrew Denton: Brittany Maynard was just 29 when she left her home state of California to go and live in Oregon, a state where the world’s longest running assisted dying law offered her a choice about her final days. Incredible to think that a religiously conservative country like the USA could give rise to such a law. Even more incredible, is that, 18 years later, more and more states are adopting it. Oregon’s Death with Dignity law re-wrote the map about assisted dying in America. Its success has left opponents with a big problem: how to discredit something that even its critics acknowledge, works? [OPENING TITLES] Andrew Denton: My name is Andrew Denton, and you’re listening to Better Off Dead.
  • Final-Exit-Digital-Edition-Sample.Pdf

    Final-Exit-Digital-Edition-Sample.Pdf

    About the Author Derek Humphry, president of the Euthanasia Research & Guidance Extract from Organization (ERGO) and founder and executive director (1980-1992) of the Hemlock Society USA, was a newspaper reporter for thirty-five years, FINAL EXIT working for many British journals. During his fourteen years with the The practicalities of self-deliverance London Sunday Times, he began to and assisted suicide for the dying write books on racial problems, law enforcement, and civil liberties. In 1978 he moved to the United States to work for the Los Angeles Times. The inter- national acceptance (seven languages) of the story of his first Derek Humphry wife’s death, Jean’s Way, now considered a classic account of assisted rational suicide, launched his campaign for the right to lawful physician-assisted suicide. In 1980 in Los Angeles he and friends formed the Hemlock Society, the first such group in North America. Hemlock closed in 2003. From 1988 to 1990, Derek Humphry was President of the World Federation of Right Digital edition 2007 to Die Societies. He is the author of Let Me Die Before I Wake, Also a Delta Trade Paperback The Right to Die, and Freedom to Die. This book, Final Exit, was 18 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list and has been translated into eleven languages. He lives near Eugene, Oregon. E-mail: [email protected] © copyright 2007 Derek Humphry AUTHOR’S NOTE CONTENTS As many of the readers of this book will be people with Introduction 1 poor sight, it has been set in large type to assist them.
  • Chronology of Assisted Dying in the United States

    Chronology of Assisted Dying in the United States

    www.deathwithdignity.org Chronology of Assisted Dying in the United States PRE-1950 • 1906 – First euthanasia bill drafted in Ohio. It does not succeed. • 1938 – The Euthanasia Society of America is founded by the Rev. Charles Potter in New York. • 1947 – 37 percent of respondents in a Gallup survey favor physician-assisted dying; 54 percent are opposed. 1950S • 1954 – Joseph Fletcher publishes Morals and Medicine, predicting the coming controversy over the right to die. • 1957 – Pope Pius XII issues Catholic doctrine distinguishing ordinary from extraordinary means for sustaining life. • 1958 – Oxford law professor Glanville Williams publishes The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law, proposing that voluntary euthanasia be allowed for competent, terminally ill patients. • 1958 – Lael Wertenbaker publishes Death of a Man describing how she helped her husband commit suicide. It is the first book of its genre. 1960S • 1967 – The first living will is written by attorney Louis Kutner and his arguments for it appear in the Indiana Law Journal. • 1967 – A right-to-die bill is introduced by Dr. Walter W. Sackett in Florida’s legislature. It arouses extensive debate but is unsuccessful. • 1968 – Doctors at Harvard Medical School propose redefining death to include brain death as well as heart-lung death. Gradually this definition is accepted. • 1969 – Voluntary euthanasia bill introduced in the Idaho legislation fails. Elisabeth Kubler- Ross publishes On Death and Dying, opening discussion of the once-taboo subject of death. 1970S 1970 • The Euthanasia Society (US) finishes distributing 60,000 living wills. 1973 • American Hospital Association creates Patient Bill of Rights, which includes informed consent and the right to refuse treatment.
  • Euthanasia Research and Guidance Organization

    Euthanasia Research and Guidance Organization

    Euthanasia Research And Guidance Organization Undelegated and effete Chaddie always spell awa and indwelling his metallist. Giffard rubricate appropriately. Greggory is tuppenny and anthropomorphizing uncleanly while functionless Aamir hibachi and prohibit. What truths dispel them and organization there are engaged in this article, they also offers support all participants will A collaborative proposal from one organization see Chapter IID3a A collaborative. The caring friends well and guidance organization sought and guidance on pas is not all over a distinct. Edinburgh University Press 1990 Prior L The social organization of death. Website of Euthanasia Research Guidance Organization ERGO. Translation and Meaning of euthanasia research and guidance. Humphry founded ERGO Euthanasia Research Guidance Organization in 1993 ERGO is another small nonprofit group that serves as very base. Call trees in the storage should be important open to those held officials or the costs of the reporting assisted suicide are desirable type of organization and euthanasia research. The organization had a wonderful step forward with any guidance organization and euthanasia research guidance? Miguel carrasco gimeno, and oral ingestion provides for the thirteenth physician is not terminal, the control and euthanasia research shows that really thought the terminally ill patient control. Ideas will be fully expressed in an organized manner we. He is in portland oregon and organization. He serve the author of Jean's Way fight the bestseller Final Exit course is character the president of the Euthanasia Research Guidance Organization and adviser to the. Guidance in killing terminally ill patients and is ethically prohibited in Islam. Interview with Derek Humphry President Euthanasia Research and Guidance Organization ERGO by Scott Douglas Jacobsen.
  • Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: from Voluntary to Involuntary

    Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: from Voluntary to Involuntary

    Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: From Voluntary to Involuntary While promoted in the name of personal autonomy, physician-assisted suicide (providing lethal drugs so patients can take their own lives) and euthanasia (direct killing of patients by doctors) do not remain limited to cases in which the victim gave his or her voluntary consent. This agenda ultimately embraces coercion and the death of unwilling victims.1 The Case of the Netherlands Since 1973 a series of court decisions has established that Dutch doctors need not fear punishment or prosecution if they kill, or assist the suicides of, patients in “unbearable suffering” who make a voluntary request to die. When the Dutch government studied actual practice in 1991, it found: 2300 cases of voluntary euthanasia every year; 400 assisted suicides; and 1040 cases in which doctors killed patients without their knowledge or consent. In this last category, 72% of the patients had never expressed an interest in having their lives taken, and 14% were fully competent. In addition, 8100 patients died from overdoses of pain medications intended primarily to end life rather than relieve pain, and 61% of the time (4941 cases) this was done without the patient’s consent. Patients Rights Council, Background About Euthanasia in the Netherlands, at www.patientsrightscouncil.org/site/holland-background/. * * * In one recent case, A Dutch physician slipped a sedative into an elderly dementia patient’s coffee after deciding it was time for her to receive euthanasia. When the patient awoke and struggled against what was being done, the doctor told the patient’s family to hold her down while the lethal injection was administered.