PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES: TOWARDS AN “INTEGRATED” APPROACH BASED ON DOMESTIC PRACTICE REPORT OF THE THIRD UNIVERSAL MEETING OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW Volume II: Annexes

ICRC Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law International Committee of the Red Cross 19, avenue de la Paix 1202 Geneva, Switzerland T +41 22 734 60 01 F +41 22 733 20 57 E-mail: [email protected] www.icrc.org © ICRC, February 2014 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES: TOWARDS AN “INTEGRATED” APPROACH BASED ON DOMESTIC PRACTICE REPORT OF THE THIRD UNIVERSAL MEETING OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW Volume II: Annexes

Prepared by: Anne-Marie La Rosa This report is also available in Arabic, French, Spanish, Russian and Chinese. It comprises two volumes containing the text of the report itself and the annexes to which it refers, respectively.

The report comes with a DVD of other material useful for the national implementation of IHL.

All comments on the report and its annexes should be sent to the ICRC Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law at: [email protected]. LIST OF ANNEXES 3 LIST OF ANNEXES 1. LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 5

2. DETAILED PROGRAMME WITH LIST OF MODERATORS AND PANELISTS 23

3. BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 31

4. TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS ON CRIMINAL SANCTIONS IN IHL AND OTHER RELATED PROVISIONS 53

5. TABLE OF NATIONAL CASE LAW ON INTERNATIONAL CRIMES AND UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION 123

6. ELEMENTS WHICH DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SANCTIONS AND COMMENTS 133

7. LIST OF NATIONAL IHL COMMITTEES AND OTHER NATIONAL BODIES 143

8. LIST OF REGIONAL MEETINGS OF NATIONAL IHL COMMITTEES (COVERING THE ROME STATUTE) 217

9. PLEDGES MADE AT THE REVIEW CONFERENCE OF THE ROME STATUTE AND THE 30TH AND 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES OF THE RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT 227

10. CONCLUDING STATEMENT BY MR YVES SANDOZ, MEMBER OF THE ICRC AND FORMER ICRC DIRECTOR OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND PRINCIPLES 331 1. LIST OF PARTICIPANTS *

* The list of participants is available in English only and is reproduced here as it was distributed at the meeting. 6 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES International Humanitarian Law International Humanitarian Law

Interministerial Working Group on the Dissemination NSW National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Australian Red Cross NSW National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Committee on International Humanitarian Law Implementation (CIHLI) Committee on International Humanitarian Law Implementation National Committee on International Humanitarian Law National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Institution Interministerial Working Group on the Dissemination Committee on International Humanitarian Law Implementation Committee on International Humanitarian Law Implementation of of IHL

IHL

Head of Department for Legal Affairs and Migration Deputy IHL Manager Counsel to the Directorate of Operations and International Law Deputy Head of Legal Provision and Branch International Treaties 2nd Secretary, UN Desk Department of International Organizations Lawyer Adviser and Secretary to the CIHLI Legal Adviser to the Ministry of Justice, Security and Human Rights Adviser to the Minister of Justice Head of Division to the Ministry of Justice Legal Adviser to the Red Crescent Society Minister of JusticeMinister of Title Deputy Head of International Law and Treaties Department Legal Officer to the Federal Ministry for European International and Affairs Secretary of the Committee on Implementation Chairman of the National Committee on Implementation Dr SCHNEIDER Bernhard SCHNEIDER Dr Ms McCOSKER Louise Ms HORVATH Szabina Mr AVETISYAN Aleksandr Mr GHUKASYAN Davit Ms SIFON URRESTARAZU Marie Jose Ms LUTERSTEIN Natalia M. Mr NACEREDDINE Marouk Mr BUDNIK Yaroslav Mr BENACHENHOV Abdel El Ilah Mr GOLOVANOV Viktor Name Mr HASANOV Ramin Mr UNGER Thomas Austria Australia Armenia Argentina Belarus Algeria Country Azerbaijan ANNEX 1: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 7 International Humanitarian Law in Brazil International Humanitarian Law in Brazil International Humanitarian Law in Brazil

Standing National Committee International on Humanitarian Law Implementation National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Implementation Interministerial Committee International of Humanitarian Law Interministerial Committee International of Humanitarian Law Interministerial Committee on Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law Interministerial Committee International of Humanitarian Law Institution Interministerial Committee on Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law National Committee Diffusion for Implementation and National Committee Diffusion for Implementation and National Committee Diffusion for Implementation and Standing National Committee International on Humanitarian Law Implementation of of of IHL

Head of the Human Rights’ Office - DGRM Secretary Delegate Deputy Director for Legal Affairs Adviser to the SPF Foreign Affairs Director of the National Legislative Service Auditor General Adviser to the chancellery of the Prime Minister Permanent Technical SecretaryPermanent Technical Federal Coordinator - Cooperation with International Jurisdiction Criminal Title General Secretary at the Ministry of Human PromotionRights’ Head of the Department of International Organizations Assistant Secretary the UN of Division Executive Secretary of the National Committee Diffusion for Implementation and of IHL in Brazil Second Secretary President of the National Committee on Dr VIDAL MURIEL Yolanda Zaida Dr RODRIGUEZ CARVAJAL Adolfo Mr SAIZONOU Eric Franck Mr GOLDMAN Alexis Mr GACUKO Leonard Mr NIYUNGEKO Jean-Bosco Mr GOES Benjamin Ms DERME TRAORE Maïmouna Mr DIVE Gérard Name Mr DEMBELE André Mr DUARTE Carlos Mr MARTINS RIZZO Ricardo Mr TRINDADE Otávio Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Benin Burundi Belgium Country Faso Burkina Brazil 8 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES Commission for International Humanitarian Law Commission for International Humanitarian Law National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Interministerial Commission International and LawHumanitarian Interministerial Commission International and LawHumanitarian Ad hoc Ad Intersectorial Permanent Commission Human the for Rights and the Humanitarian International Law Ad hoc Ad Intersectorial Permanent Commission Human the for Rights and the Humanitarian International Law The Canadian National Committee for Humanitarian Law National Committee on International Humanitarian Law The Canadian National Committee for Humanitarian Law National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Institution National Committee on International Humanitarian Law National Committee on International Humanitarian Law

IHL

Commission IHL for Legal Counsel Head of the International Relations and Unit Cooperation Director of Legal Affairs, Archives and Data Responsible for Children and Rights Women’s Interim General Delegate for Human Rights and IHL Minister of Public Service and Human Rights President of the National Committee First Deputy Public Prosecutor Ambassador President of the hoc Ad Director Legal Affairs of Litigations and Minister Director, United Nations, Human Rights and Economic Law Professor of Military Law, Legal Expert Judge at the Superior Court of Quebec Senior Legal Adviser Deputy Director of External Liaison Department Title Attachee to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs President of the National Committee on Ambassador SALINAS BURGOS Hernán Mr BELLEI TAGLE Carlos Mr MOUSSA Couguere Ms RAZAFIARISOA Justine Emma Mr DJAZILA Saendou Mr DJOUBAYE ABAZENE Arnauld Ambassador VARGAS Clara Ines Mr BANGALE GBIAMA Jonas Dr REY Gedeon Jaramillo Ms NOLKE Sabine Ms WANG Mei Mr DENIS André Mr MAIOLO Ilario Mr REN Hao Name Mr HE Liang Chile Chad Central African Republic (CAR) Colombia Canada Country China ANNEX 1: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 9 Croatian National Committee International on LawHumanitarian Croatian National Committee International on LawHumanitarian Croatian National Committee International on LawHumanitarian Interministerial Committee International on Humanitarian Law Implementation Interministerial Committee International on Humanitarian Law Implementation Institution Costa Rica Committee on International Humanitarian Law GovernmentDanish Committee International on LawHumanitarian Costa Rica Committee on International Humanitarian Law GovernmentDanish Committee International on LawHumanitarian IHL

IHL

Deputy Secretary General Head Secretariat of Member of Danish Government Committee Legal Adviser, International Law DepartmentLegal Adviser, Executive President Executive Head International the of Department Head of Office of the Executive President Diplomatic OfficerDiplomatic Magistrate Deputy Director of Studies and Legislation Solicitor General International Organizations and Director, Treaties Deputy Director of Humanitarian Affairs Title Legal Adviser at the Ministry of Justice Head of Section to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Executive Secretary to the Committee on on Mr HANSEN Preben Soegaard Ms OCHMANNOVA Petra Dr JAVORNIK Nenad Mr JAGIC Nikola Ms DAMJANOVIC Katija Ms PORRAS PASTRÁN Paola Patricia Mr YAPI Kacou Michel Mr ELIKANA Tingika Ms PATAI Myra Mr EZOUAN Timothée Name Mr SIBAJA ÁLVAREZ Manrique Ms STEEN Lene Denmark Czech Republic Croatia Costa Rica Cook Islands Côte d’Ivoire Country 10 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES Application Application Implementation Implementation Implementation

International Humanitarian Law International Humanitarian Law

Consultative National Commission on Human Rights Consultative National Commission on Human Rights Institution National Committee International on Humanitarian SalvadorEl Intersectorial National Committee The National Finnish Committee International on LawHumanitarian Standing National Commission International on Humanitarian Law Implementation National Committee International on Humanitarian National Committee International on Humanitarian SalvadorEl Intersectorial National Committee National Commission International on Humanitarian Standing National Commission International on Humanitarian Law Implementation Law National Commission International on Humanitarian Law Law Law Law on on IHL

IHL Implementation IHL

Head of Public International Law Department Deputy Head of the International Relations Department President of the Standing National Committee Legal Adviser Vice-president of the National Commission Title Vice-minister of Justice in charge of Legislations Legal Adviser Member of the CIDIH and of the Committee of Historical Memory Senior Officer, Legal Affairs Second-in-charge National the at Congress Deputy Secretary General to the Egyptian Parliament Judge to the Ministry of Justice Technical Coordinator for Registration of Properties Cultural Director of Human Rights and IHL at the Ministry of Defense on on President of the National Committee on Ms TOMASHVILI Tamar Ms SANNIER Nazli Ambassador PICHARDO OLIVIER Miguel Anibal Ms BIENVENU Noémie Mr BELTRÁN BASTIDAS Diego Name Dr EL SHERIF Omar Gonzalo Jesús FUENTES CONTRERAS Mr PURSIAINEN Aleksi Mr Mr SUAREZ DIAZ Victor Valdemar Dr CARRILLO MALES María Fernanda General HELAL Abdel Ghafar Mr NOUR Ahmed Cherif Ms GANUZA DURÁN Celina Georgia Dominican Republic France Ecuador Country Egypt El Salvador Finland ANNEX 1: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 11 Dissemination of IHL

Honduran Intersectorial Commission International on Humanitarian Law Hellenic National Committee on the Implementation Honduran Intersectorial Commission International on Humanitarian Law The Iranian National Committee on Humanitarian Law Guatemalan CommitteeGuatemalan International on Humanitarian Law Implementation Committee on International Humanitarian Law The Interministerial Committee International on LawHumanitarian Institution CommitteeGuatemalan International on Humanitarian Law Implementation The Interministerial Committee International on LawHumanitarian and The National Advisory Committee International on LawHumanitarian The National Advisory Committee International on LawHumanitarian The Iranian National Committee on Humanitarian Law IHL IHL

IHL

Secretary of the National Advisory Committee Legal Adviser, Legal Adviser, General Direction Special of Affairs Professor Secretary General Iranian the National of Supreme Court Magistrate Principal State Attorney Liaison between Iranian Red Crescent Society and ICRC Del. Legal Adviser President of the German IHL Committee President of the IHFFC Adviser Title Executive Secretary of the Guatemalan Committee Deputy – Chairman at the National Advisory Director for International Law on Committee on Committee on Ms JANTSITS Agnes JANTSITS Ms Ms MAAS Consuelo Maria Professor KALLIOPIProfessor Koufa Mr ROSTAMY Zaher Mr CÁLIX VALLECILLO Carlos Ms ADDO-OKYIREH Emily Mr BAHADORI Vahid Reza Ms DE LEON TERRON Maria Cecilia Professor BOTHE Michael Ms FATHYA Vita Nurul Name Mr AVILA MARTINEZ Carlos Hugo Mr VARGA Attila Ms CHAIRIJAH Chairijah Hungary Greece Honduras Ghana Iran (Islamic Republic of) Germany Country Guatemala Indonesia 12 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES National Committee on International Humanitarian Law (NCIHL) National Committee on International Humanitarian Law (NCIHL) National Committee on International Humanitarian Law (NCIHL) The National Committee on Implementation of International Humanitarian Law Interdepartmental Commission on International Law and Human Rights Treaties The National Committee International the on Humanitarian Law Implementation The National Committee International the on Humanitarian Law Implementation National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Committee of Study for the adjustment of the juridical arrangement to the agreements and the rules of international humanitarian law Committee of Study for the adjustment of the juridical arrangement to the agreements and the rules of international humanitarian law Committee of Study for the adjustment of the juridical arrangement to the agreements and the rules of international humanitarian law Institution

Deputy Assistant Defence Minister of General Director Legal the Department of Member of the NCIHL Professor Senior Deputy Chief State Counsel Senior Prosecutor International the of DepartmentCooperation Chairman of the NCIHL Member of the Executive Committee Deputy Director General International the of Department First CounselorFirst Deputy Head of Department to the Ministry Justice of Minister plenipotentiary Head of Unit of litigation and treaties Title Dr BUZUBAR Mohamed Abdullah General AL ROWEHI Asaad Abdul Rahman Professor AL ANEZI Rashid Hamad Ms WACHIRA Mwangi Njeri Mr RYSKULOV Daulet Mr AL KHASAWNEH Mamoun Dr AL JAZY Ibrahim Mr HORI Otohiko HORI Mr Ms FAVI Federica Mr MARTELLO Pietro Mr BOSCOMr Giorgio Name Kuwait Kenya Kazakhstan Jordan Japan Italy Country ANNEX 1: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 13 IHL (Jawatankuasa IHL (Jawatankuasa

The National Committee of Lebanon CommitteeThe National of Commission the Implementation on of International Humanitarian Law The Interdepartmental Committee International on Humanitarian Law Implementation The Interdepartmental Committee International on Humanitarian Law Implementation Commission Nationale Droit du International Humanitaire (CONADIH) Institution The National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Commission Nationale Droit du International Humanitaire (CONADIH) The National Committee on International Humanitarian Law The National Committee International on Humanitarian Law Malaysian National Committee on Antarabangsa Kemanusiaan Undang-undang Malaysia) JUKAM Malaysian National Committee on Antarabangsa Kemanusiaan Undang-undang Malaysia) JUKAM

IHL

IHL,

IHL

Principal Secretary Head of IHL bureau in the Lebanese Army Secretary of the Commission on the Implementation IHL of Senior Officer of Department of Law and International Cooperation First Secretary to the Foreign Affairs of Liechtenstein Leading Specialist, Department of Normative Legal Acts Attorney of Law fellow Magistrate Title Legal Officer to the Ministry of Education and Training Attorney-General’sFederal Counsellor, Chambers of Malaysia Undersecretary, Department of Research, Treaties and International Law Magistrate, Head of the International Relations Chairperson of the National Committee on President of the National Commission on Chairman of the National Committee on Ms LEBESA Mahali Ms ARIVONY Eugénie Liliane General AL Raouf SAYAH Ms BERNADISIUTE Agne Ms Ms UMETOVA Nazgul Ms FROMMELT Isabel FROMMELT Ms General CHIMOWA Rodrick Rick Ms ISABAEVA Nurila Ms REEVES Therenna Ms RAHARISALAMA Olga RAHARISALAMA Ms Name Ms SEOLI Moliehi Ms HOH Michelle Ms ABDULLAH Sharrina Lesotho Madagascar Lebanon Lithuania Liechtenstein Malawi Kyrgyzstan Liberia Country Malaysia 14 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES IHL IHL

Committee on International Humanitarian Law Implementation Intersecretarial Committee International on LawHumanitarian Intersecretarial Committee International on LawHumanitarian Intersecretarial Committee International on LawHumanitarian Mauritian Committee on International Humanitarian Law Mauritian Committee on International Humanitarian Law Institution Interministerial Technical CommitteeInterministerial Technical Human on Rights Law Humanitarian and Committee on International Humanitarian Law Implementation Mongolian National Committee on Mongolian National Committee on Moroccan National Commission International for Humanitarian Law Moroccan National Commission International for Humanitarian Law National Committee on International Humanitarian Law National Committee on International Humanitarian Law IHL

IHL

IHL

IHL Implementation IHL

Head of the Division on Preparation Legislativeof acts Secretary of the National Committee Head of the Legal Affairs Division, Department of International Law (MFA) Head of the Legal Unit of the Secretariat of the Navy Director of IHL Legal Adviser, Secretariat of Foreign Affairs Subdirector International of Affairs of the Ministry of Defence Principal State Counsel Director Cabinet the of Under Secretary of the National Committee Title Joint Secretary, Member – Secretary of the Director of the Law Department Ombudsman Namibia of Under Secretary General on Member of the National Commission on President of the National Commission on on National Committee on Ms FILATOVA Tatiana Mr BOBEICA Corneliu Captain VAZQUEZ HERNANDEZ Alejandro Ms SALAZAR ALBORNOZ Mariana General Brigadier RODRÍGUEZ CORREA Rogelio Ms GOORDYAL-CHITTOO Prameeta Devi Rasheela Ms FONG WENG-POORUN Kan Oye Mr GAUTAM Phanindra Name Mr CHOUKRI Graoui Ms EL KHAMLICHI Farida Mr PAUDEL Kedar Mr CHIMEDDORJ Battumur CHIMEDDORJ Mr Mr WALTERS John Robert Mr ZAMBALGARAV Jadamba Moldova Mexico Mauritius Nepal Country Morocco Mongolia Namibia ANNEX 1: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 15

Implementation Implementation

National Commission of Study and Application of the Humanitarian International Law National Commission of Study and Application of the Humanitarian International Law CONADIH Deutscher Entwicklungsdienst (German Development Service (DED) ) Interinstitutional Commission International on Humanitarian Law Study and Implementation Interinstitutional Commission International on Humanitarian Law Study and Implementation Standing National Committee International on Humanitarian Law Implementation National Committee International on Humanitarian Institution National Committee International on Humanitarian Law Law Acting Director, Human Rights Affairs Humanitarian and State Counsel IV Undersecretary to the Department Nationalof Defence Chairman of the CONADIH Third Secretary to the Diplomatic Service located at the General Direction for Human Rights International Adviser Lawyer Executive Secretary of the Committee Major of the Military Justice President the Committee of Member of the Central Committee of the Panama Red Cross Society First Secretary Deputy Head of Mission Convenor Title Federation the Solicitor-General of Permanent Secretaryand Legal Adviser to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade Ms ACOP Rapunzel Ms ANGELES Herminia Mr BATINO Pio Lorenzo Dr HAAS DEL CARPIO Stephen Yuri Ms ESPINOZA CARRIÓN Katia Ms BUSTAMANTE TORRES Gloria Marcela Ms TORALES GONZÁLEZ Claudia Major DÁVALOS INSFRÁN Gustavo Mr SOLIS GONZALEZ Elias Mr KHAN Aamir Mohammad Mr KHAN Shafqat Ali Dr ALLEY Roderic Name Mr MOSES Reuel Kpana Ms KING Alice Philippines Peru Paraguay Panama Pakistan New Zealand New Country Nigeria 16 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES National Committee on International Humanitarian Law National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Saudi Red Crescent Authority, International Humanitarian Law Committee Saudi Red Crescent Authority, International Humanitarian Law Committee Saudi Red Crescent Authority, International Humanitarian Law Committee Saudi Red Crescent Authority, International Humanitarian Law Committee Samoan National IHL Committee Samoan National IHL Committee Romanian National Committee International on LawHumanitarian Korean National Committee International for LawHumanitarian Interministerial Commission International for Humanitarian Law Affairs Interministerial Commission International for Humanitarian Law Affairs Institution President of the National Committee LegalChief Adviser Counsellor to the Ministry of Justice Director Cabinet of Acting Vice President Acting Acting Director International the of Affairs Adviser International for Affairs the to President Secretary the President of Foreign Service Officer Principal State Solicitor Director of International Law and Treaties Director Cooperation of International and Legal Affairs Division Director of the Treaties Division Magistrate First Secretary of the Inter-ministerial Commission IHL for Deputy Director, Legal and Treaty Department Title Mr OBRADOVIC Sasa Mr COGURIC Milisav Mr GAYE Ndiamé Mr YOSEF Fayiz Ali H.H. Prince AL-SAUD Abdullah Faisal Mr AL-HARFI Faeq Ali Mr AL DHOYIAN Abdul Aziz Nasser Mr PAGAIALII Rapture Mr BEDNALL Peter Ms GRAVILESCU Victoria Mr MVIBOUDOULOU Simon William Mr TAE Jun Youl Mr RODRIGUES Almiro Mr ZYMANMr Grzegorz Mr MISZTAL Andrzej Name Serbia Senegal Saudi Arabia Saudi Samoa Romania Republic of the Congo Republic of Korea (South) Portugal Poland Country ANNEX 1: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 17 National Committee on International Humanitarian Law National Committee on International Humanitarian Law National Commission on International Humanitarian Law (NCIHL) National Commission on International Humanitarian Law National Commission on International Humanitarian Law National Humanitarian Affairs Committee National Committee on International Humanitarian Law National Humanitarian Affairs Committee National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Institution National Committee on International Humanitarian Law National Commission on International Humanitarian Law (NCIHL) IHL

Acting Legal Adviser to the Ministry Externalof Affairs Additional (Legal) Secretary to the Ministry Justice of Honorary President of the NCIHL Professor of Public International Law Director International of Legal Affairs Researchand Deputy Head, Department of Consultancy Internationalon Law Technical Adviser Chairman of the Seychelles Humanitarian Affairs Committee Director Legal Advice to the Defence Department Member of Seychelles Humanitarian Affairs Committee National the Member of Assembly Senior State Law Adviser Office of the Chief State Law Adviser (International Law) Title Acting Director Human Rights and AffairsHumanitarian Chairperson National the of IHL Committee President of the National Commission on Ms MAYADUNNE Nelum Ambassador MIKSA Franc Ms DE SILVA Kamalini Dr JOGAN Savin Mr VAL GARIJO Fernando Mr NYUMA Joe Faya Mr URBIOLA LOPEZ DE MONTENEGRO Jorge Mr MICHAUD Philippe Mr SIVIWE Njikela Mr CLIFFORD André Mr STEMMET Andre Name Mr OOSTHUIZEN Andries Sri Lanka Slovenia Sierra Leone Spain Seychelles Country South AfricaSouth 18 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Interdepartmental Committee International on Humanitarian Law National International Humanitarian Law Committee Interdepartmental Committee International on Humanitarian Law Swedish Defence Total Council for International LawHumanitarian Interministerial Commission International on Humanitarian Law Swedish Defence Total Council for International LawHumanitarian Institution National Committee on International Humanitarian Law National Committee on International Humanitarian Law National Committee on International Humanitarian Law IHL IHL

Representative of the Ministry of Interior in Director Legal the Department of Head of the Section of Human Rights and IHL Directorate International for Law Technical Adviser to the Ministry of Justice Constitutionaland Affairs Human Rights and IHL Section Directorate International for Law Military Judge, Legal Adviser in Turkish General Staff, Turkish Army Assistant General Legal Adviser Turkish in Staff, Turkish Army Chairperson of the Council Director General Legal Affairs for Magistrate Secretary of the Council Deputy Director Second Secretary to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Title Representative of the Ministry of Defence in Minister of State for Arab Syrian Red Crescent Affairs and President of the National Committee on International Humanitarian Law National Committee on National Committee on General GHAZALI Ismaiel Mr AKKAD Mohamed Mr VAVRICKA Viktor Ms ODOI MUSOKE Rachel Mr SCHWENDIMANN Félix Major CIDEM Oksan Major YESILKAYA Olcay Ms HEDEGARD Maria Ms GAYIBOR Pierrette Mr ANDERSSON Mikael Mr Ms NGAMWISEDCHAIKUL Sirawadee Name Major General MALOULA Nicola Dr AL-SHAAR Bashar Syria Uganda Switzerland Turkey Togo Sweden Thailand Country ANNEX 1: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 19 Interministerial Committee on Human Rights and LawHumanitarian Interministerial Committee on Human Rights and LawHumanitarian National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Implementation National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Implementation National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Affairs National Committee for International Humanitarian Law Affairs National Committee on International Humanitarian Law Inter-departmental Committee International on LawHumanitarian Inter-departmental Committee International on LawHumanitarian National Commission on International Humanitarian Law (NCIHL) Committee Intergovernmental International on LawHumanitarian Committee Intergovernmental International on LawHumanitarian Committee Intergovernmental International on LawHumanitarian Institution

Legal Adviser to the Ministry of Labour and Social Services Chief Legal officer, Defence Forces Director Legal Services of Director Legal Services of Rapporteur Head of Legal Affairs and Treaties Department Third Secretary of the Treaty and Law Department Head of Social Services Assistant Legal Adviser at the Foreign and OfficeCommonwealth Head of International Law, Counselor Legal Affairs Department President of the Ukrainian Red Cross Society Leading Specialist to the Ministry of Justice Department Director of the Ministry of Justice Title Ms SIBIYA Precious Lt Col. MUTUNGWAZI John Joseph Colonel PHIRIColonel Moses Colonel MAISON Maanga Dr ZABARAH Abbas ZABARAH Dr Ambassador HUDNA Saleh Mr GAFFAROV Odiljon Ms GONZÁLEZ GARGANO Ana Gabriela Mr RYCROFT Theo Mr MEYER Michael Mr AL KOTBI Said Mouheir Mr USICHENKO Ivan Ms HERASYMCHUK Maryna Ms ANDRIEVA Tamara Name Zimbabwe Zambia Yemen Uzbekistan Uruguay United Kingdom United Arab Emirates Ukraine Country 20 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES Development Studies

the Former Yugoslavia

for and Institution Organization Consultative Asian-African Legal Caribbean Community Secretariat Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Coalition for the ICC/CPI Commonwealth Secretariat European Union Interamerican Juridical Committee the OAS of International Court Criminal (ICC) JusticeInternational Center Transitional of Rwanda for International Tribunal Criminal International Humanitarian Fact Commission Finding Organization American of States Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations International Tribunal Criminal European Union Delegation in Geneva Graduate Institute International of Syracuse University, US University Externado of Colombia University Paul Cézanne ICRC Senior Legal Officer Senior Legal Officer Regional Adviser Americas Coordinator Director Legal Constitutional the and of Affairs Division (LCAD) General Director Administrator Relex, Member and Rapporteur Legal Adviser – Office of the Prosecutor Consultant Registrar Vice-President of the IHFFC Director of the Department of International Law Chief of the Rules of Law, Equality and Non-discrimination Branch Human Rights Officer Deputy Chief of Cabinet Professor Professor of Penal Law, Procedural Law and IHL Professor of Public Law, Research Director Member of the Assembly of the ICRC Title Second Secretary Practice of Professor

Mr KUNNUMPURATH SULAIMAN SULAIMAN KUNNUMPURATH Mr Mohammed Hussain Mr FRASER David Mr OLAYEMI Olatunde Ms VARDA Francesca Mr KHAN Akbar Mr KING Tobias Professor HERDOCIA SACASA Mauricio Mr RASTAN Rod Mr IVANISEVIC Bogdan Mr DIENG Adama Professor DJILALI Ghalib Mr NEGRO Dante Mona RISHMAWI Ms Dr SOLERA Oscar Mr DAWSON Grant Professor CAFLISCH Lucius Professor GUERRERO PERALTA Oscar Julián Professor PHILIPPE Xavier Mr SANDOZ Yves Name Ms BIRLADIANU Nicoleta Professor CRANE David M. ANNEX 1: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 21 ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC ICRC Institution ICRC ICRC IHL IHL IHL IHL IHL IHL IHL IHL

IHL

IHL IHL IHL

IHL IHL

IHL

Legal Adviser Assistant Assistant coordinator – Attachee to the Relations with Civil Society Attachee to the Relations with Arms Carriers Attachee Legal the Division to Attachee Legal the Division to Head of the Advisory Service on Legal Adviser of the Advisory Service on Legal Adviser of the Advisory Service on Legal Adviser of the Advisory Service on Legal Researcher of the Advisory Service on Regional Legal Adviser of the Advisory Service on Regional Legal Adviser of the Advisory Service on Regional Legal Adviser of the Advisory Service on Regional Legal Adviser of the Advisory Service on Regional Legal Adviser of the Advisory Service on Regional Legal Adviser of the Advisory Service on Regional Legal Adviser of the Advisory Service on Regional Legal Adviser of the Advisory Service on Attachee to the Advisory Service on Attachee to the Advisory Service on Director for International Law and Cooperation Head of the Division for the Integration and Promotion of the Law Title Ms LA ROSA Anne-Marie Mr BLAZEBY Len Antoine BOUVIER Mr Mr CHAVEZ TAFUR Gabriel Mr ATLAM Cherif Mr BLACK Christopher Richard DESGAGNE Mr Ms DUTLI María Teresa Ms FONTAINE Fanny Mr HARLAND Christopher Mr KOLANOWSKI Stéphane Ms THYNNE Kelisiana Mr ZAHND Patrick Arezou HASSANZADEH Ms Ms ROBICHAUD Myriam Ms DARDEAU Fanny Ms OYONO Valérie Ms GARCIA Juliane Mr KERGUEN Nicolas Ms NISHAT Nishat Ms WEILER Caroline Mr SPOERRI Philip Mr SENECHAUD François Ms PELLANDINI Cristina Name 2. DETAILED PROGRAMME WITH LIST OF MODERATORS AND PANELISTS 24 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

PROGRAMME Inaugural session Wednesday morning, 27 October 2010

Moderator: François Sénéchaud Head of the Division for Integration and Promotion of Law, ICRC

9.00–9.30: Arrival and registration of the participants, Centre International de Conférences Genève (CICG)

9.30–10.00: Opening address by Philip Spoerri, Director for International Law and Cooperation, ICRC

10.00–10.30: Coffee break

10.30–11.00: Background, objectives and methodology of the Meeting by Cristina Pellandini, Head of the Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, ICRC

11.00 –11.45: An “integrated” approach to the domestic repression of serious violations of international humanitarian law by Anne–Marie La Rosa, Legal Adviser, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, ICRC

11.45–12.30: Discussions ANNEX 2: DETAILED PROGRAMME 25

PROGRAMME Working Group 1 – Methods of incorporation Wednesday afternoon, 27 October 2010

Moderator: Gérard Dive (Belgium) Federal Coordinator - Cooperation with International Criminal Jurisdictions Representative of the Ministry of Justice on the Working Group on Dissemination, Interministerial Commission for International Humanitarian Law

Rapporteur: Rogelio Rodríguez Correa (Mexico) Subdirector of International Affairs, Ministry of Defence Comisión Intersecretarial de Derecho Internacional Humanitaria

Panelists

Abdel Ghafar Helal, Secretary General, Egyptian Parliament; Member of the National Committee on International Humanitarian Law, Egypt

André Dembélé, President, Comité interministériel des droits humains et du droit international humanitaire, Burkina Faso

Szabina Horvath, Legal Counsel (International Law), Directorate of Operations and International Law, Department of Defence, Australia

Wang Mei, Associate Professor of Military Law at the PLA National Defense University, China 26 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

PROGRAMME Working Group 2 – Ways and solutions to address challenges to incorporation Wednesday afternoon, 27 October 2010

Moderator: Chairijah Chairijah (Indonésie) Director for International Law Permanent Committee of Implementation and Research of International Humanitarian Law

Rapporteur: Njeri Wachira Mwangi (Kenya) Senior Deputy Chief State Counsel National Committee for the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law

Panelists

Andre Stemmet, Senior State Law Adviser, Department of International Relations and Cooperation, South Africa

Mohamed Abdullah Buzubar, Deputy Assistant Minister, Ministry of Defence, Kuwait

Tamar Tomashvili, Head of Public International Law Department, Ministry of Justice, Georgia ANNEX 2: DETAILED PROGRAMME 27

PROGRAMME Plenary session – Tools to assist in the incorporation of IHL crimes Thursday morning, 28 October 2010

Moderator: Rod Rastan Legal Adviser, Office of the Prosecutor, ICC

Panelists

Akbar Khan, Director of the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Division, Commonwealth Secretariat

Leonard Blazeby, Legal Adviser, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, ICRC

Dante Negro, Director of the Department of International Law, OAS

Tobias King, Administrator, Human Rights Unit, Directorate-General for External Relations, European Union

Participant

Francesca Varda, Americas Coordinator, Coalition for the ICC/CPI 28 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

PROGRAMME Working Group 3 – Jurisdictional perspective Thursday afternoon, 28 October 2010

Moderator: Lucius Caflisch Emeritus Professor Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva

Rapporteur: Ibrahim Al Jazy (Jordanie) Member of the Executive Committee National Committee for the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law

Panelists

André Denis, Judge, Superior Court of Quebec, Canada

Grant Dawson, Deputy Chef de Cabinet, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia

Oscar Julián Guerrero Peralta, Professor of Criminal Law, Criminal Law Procedure and International Humanitarian Law, Externado University of Colombia

Mauricio Herdocia Sacasa, Rapporteur for the OAS Inter-American Juridical Committee to the ICC ANNEX 2: DETAILED PROGRAMME 29

PROGRAMME Working Group 4 – Preventive role of repression/sanction on individual behaviour Thursday afternoon, 28 October 2010

Moderator: Xavier Philippe Professor of Public Law at Paul Cézanne University Aix-Marseille III

Rapporteur: Therenna Reeves (Libéria) Attorney of Law fellow, Ministry of Justice

Panelists

Adama Dieng, Registrar, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Almiro Rodrigues, Magistrate, Constitutional Court of Kosovo

David Michael Crane, Professor, Syracuse University College of Law, United States of America

Mona Rishmawi, Chief of the Rule of Law, Equality and Non-discrimination Branch, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights 30 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

PROGRAMME Plenary session – Enhanced role of national IHL committees Friday morning, 29 October 2010

Moderator: Patrick Zahnd Regional Legal Adviser for Latin America and the Caribbean, ICRC

Panelists

Viktor J. Vavricka, Head of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Section, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Switzerland

Jaroslav Budnik, Head of Division, Ministry of Justice; Secretary of the National Committee for the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law, Belarus

Ambassadeur Hernán Salinas Burgos, President, Comisión Nacional de Derecho Humanitario, Chile

Mahali Lebesa, Principal Secretary, Ministry of Defence and National Security; Chairperson, National Committee for International Humanitarian Law, Lesotho 3. BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 32 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

Table of contents

1. INTRODUCTION 33

2. MEETING OBJECTIVES 35

3. PARTICIPANTS’ PROFILE 35

4. CONTRIBUTION OF PARTICIPANTS 36

5. METHODOLOGY 37

6. EXPECTED OUTCOMES 37

7. DETAILED PROGRAMME 38 Wednesday morning 38 Wednesday afternoon 38 Working Group 1 (180 min) – Methods of incorporation 38 Working Group 2 (180 min) – Ways and solutions to address challenges to incorporation 41 Thursday morning 43 Plenary (120 min) – Tools to assist in the incorporation of IHL crimes 43 Thursday afternoon 45 Working Group 3 (180 min) – Jurisdictional perspective 45 Working Group 4 (180 min) – Preventive role of repression/sanction on individual behaviour 48 Friday morning 50 Plenary (120 min.) – Enhanced role of national IHL committees 50 ANNEX 3: BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 33

1. Introduction

Despite the valuable contribution of the ad hoc inter- national tribunals, and most recently the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC or Court), the criminal repression of serious violations of international humani- tarian law (IHL) remains primarily the responsibility of States. Based on grounds of efficiency (access to evidence, a judicial apparatus in place) and justice (proximity to the victims and increased dissuasive effect of holding a trial where the crime was committed), this responsibility derives most importantly from States’ obligation to “investigate war crimes allegedly committed by their nationals or armed forces, or on their territory, and, if appropriate, prosecute the suspects”.1 The effective application of the ICC’s com- plementarity principle, which gives precedence to national courts over the ICC in responding to crimes covered by the Rome Statute, also depends on States making sure that they have the necessary apparatus to prosecute and judge ICC crimes.

Such State actions are obviously not performed in a vacuum. They are but one stage in a cycle of constant inter- playing between the development and application of international and domestic law. In this cycle, the implemen- tation of IHL – the incorporation of international obligations into the domestic legal system of States – fulfils an essential role. During this process, many challenges are likely to be encountered; the aim remains, however, to achieve a common set of rules regarding war crimes, which can be enforced everywhere by domestic courts.

Few recent developments have provided greater momentum toward the criminal repression of IHL violations – and, in particular, of grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions – than the adoption of the Rome Statute.

1. J. Henckaerts and L. Doswald-Beck, Customary IHL, Rule 158, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005, pp. 607-611. 34 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

The result of truly multilateral negotiations, the treaty remains the first and most comprehensive multilateral attempt to establish a code of international crimes that could truly inspire domestic legislators when implementing punishment for IHL crimes at domestic level. The Rome Statute has now been widely ratified, with 111 States parties, though there is still more work to be done to make it truly universal. The Review Conference of the ICC, which agreed to bring Article 8 of the Statute (war crimes) closer to com- pliance with IHL, makes the Rome Statute an even better starting point than before.

Implementation of the Rome Statute into national law is most effective when it is part of an integrated approach to the implementation of punishment for serious violations of IHL. Such an approach has a number of facets, of which two should be highlighted. First, it ensures consistency between international law and domestic law. One consequence would be the absence of substantial differences between the international and domestic applications of the defini- tions of international crimes or the general principles of international criminal law.

Second, an integrated approach ensures the comprehensive incorporation of all serious violations of IHL into domestic criminal law, including those crimes found in treaties (most notably in the Rome Statute, but also in other IHL related treaties concerning, inter alia, weapons, protected persons or the conduct of hostilities) or in customary law. This integrated approach will be the focus of the meeting. ANNEX 3: BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 35

2. Meeting objectives

This meeting is an occasion to take stock of the extent of domestic implementation of punishment for IHL crimes worldwide. More particularly, the meeting will aim to: yy explain the scope and meaning of an integrated system for the repression of serious violations of IHL and provide an overview of the legal and institutional framework required at domestic level to this end, stressing the role of the Rome Statute; yy update participants on recent developments pertaining to the incorporation at domestic level of the necessary provisions and mechanisms for the repression of serious violations of IHL; yy provide a forum for the discussion of tools designed to assist and support national IHL committees in their efforts to implement an efficient system for the repression of serious violations of IHL, drawing particular attention to the legal and institutional framework required at domestic level; and yy discuss the key role of national IHL committees in incor- porating serious violations of IHL in national laws and ensuring the maximum preventive effect of such laws.

3. Participants’ profile

Participants at the meeting will comprise primarily of State representatives of national IHL committees, which now total 95 worldwide. Representatives of national and regional organizations with expertise in the field of IHL have also been invited, in addition to a number of experts and repre- sentatives of civil society, including from the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. A number of ICRC personnel will also be present. 36 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

4. Contribution of participants

Participants will be invited to contribute practical sugges- tions for ways to achieve the meeting’s objectives and to that end to consider relevant methods, resources and tools. The participants will:

Prior to the meeting: yy familiarize themselves with their countries’ criminal law/s dealing with serious violations of IHL, including those found in Article 8 (war crimes) of the Rome Statute; yy consider the topics outlined in this background paper and hopefully discuss them with their national committee or commission, with a view to contributing actively to discussions during the meeting.

At the meeting: yy work in allocated working groups on the questions that have been raised (see below) and, where appropriate, make specific proposals on the subjects addressed; yy participate in reporting-back plenary sessions, where the results of working groups will be presented and discussed; yy participate in the two plenary sessions on tools to assist in the implementation of punishment for serious viola- tions of IHL and the enhanced role of national IHL committees;­ and yy where requested, assist the working groups and plenary sessions by taking on the role of moderator, panelist or rapporteur. ANNEX 3: BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 37

5. Methodology

The meeting will be interactive, with participants assigned to working groups in the afternoons of Wednesday 27 and Thursday 28 October. The working groups will cover a total of four topics, two groups working simultaneously. The working group sessions will take the form of discussions guided by a moderator, who will direct the discussions, initially led by panelists, on the basis of the questions identi- fied in this document (see below). Debate will then flow from questions of the panelists and interaction between the groups.

Both the working groups and plenary sessions will benefit from simultaneous translation into five languages (Arabic, English, French, Russian and Spanish).

A rapporteur will be selected from each group, who will then report back to the plenary sessions.

Two plenary sessions in the mornings of 28 and 29 October will further tackle two topics (below) that will not be the subject of working group sessions. The active involvement of participants is also expected in these sessions.

6. Expected outcomes

In the months following the meeting, the ICRC Advisory Service will publish the outcomes from the meeting. This publication will include, inter alia: yy an ICRC paper on an integrated approach to the imple- mentation at domestic level of serious violations of IHL; yy panelists’ papers contributed to working groups and plenary discussions; and yy the meeting report, including summaries of discussions held in working groups and plenary sessions, and general conclusions drawn. 38 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

7. Detailed programme

Wednesday morning The first morning of the meeting will be dedicated to ­registrations and presentations by the ICRC, which will comprise: yy an opening address by Philip Spoerri, Director for International Law and Cooperation with the (International Red Cross and Red Crescent) Movement; yy an overview of the background, objectives and method- ology of the meeting; and yy a presentation on an integrated approach to the domestic repression of serious violations of IHL, including an update on mechanisms and recent developments per- taining to the incorporation at domestic level of the relevant provisions.

There will also be time for a 45-minute discussion on any issues raised in these presentations.

Wednesday afternoon The participants will be divided into two working groups, the first on methods of incorporation, the second on chal- lenges to incorporation.

Working Group 1 (180 min.) – Methods of incorporation IHL sets out detailed rules that seek to limit the effects of armed conflict. In particular, it protects those who are not, or no longer, participating in hostilities and sets limits on the means and methods of warfare. It also provides for the criminalization of specific acts, attaching individual criminal responsibility to their perpetrators regardless of the form their participation takes. Implementing such war crimes (or other international crimes) into the domestic legislation of States – that is, making such prohibited conducts an offence within the penal system of States and, thus, punishable by their judiciary – may be achieved in a number of ways, as shown by States’ practice. ANNEX 3: BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 39

A first approach consists in applying the military or ordinary national criminal law already in force, and making use of the law applicable to those domestic crimes (such as murder, torture, grievous bodily harm, or other offences) which are closest to the conduct in question.

A second option is the criminalization of serious violations of IHL through a general reference to treaties the State is a party to, to international law in general, or, most commonly, to the “laws and customs of war”, followed by a range of penalties. This option may be found in a number of penal codes.

A third option consists of incorporating into domestic law a list of specific crimes corresponding to those found in the relevant IHL treaties. This may be achieved by: yy making a direct reference to specific articles in a treaty; yy transcribing the whole list of international crimes into national law (existing penal codes or a stand-alone law) using the treaty’s exact wording and adding only the relevant penalties applicable to each crime or category of crimes; or yy incorporating each crime individually, rewording it so as to align it more closely on the penal texts.

Fourthly, implementation of IHL crimes may follow a mixed approach, achieving criminalization through a generic refer- ence to IHL combined with the explicit and specific incor- poration of certain serious crimes into domestic law.

There is a fifth and final option. IHL may be implemented via the direct application of international law domestically, without any express reference in national legislation. This is normally allowed by a law of constitutional rank or a provision in the Constitution, by which international law (either written or customary, or both) is either recognized as a source of criminalization, or is assigned a superior rank to that of domestic law. 40 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

Participants will be asked to discuss the advantages and shortcomings of each of the abovementioned methods and consider which approach is most suitable in their national context.

QUESTIONS A. Methods of incorporation (90 min.) 1. In your view, what are the advantages and shortcomings of each method of incorporation, i.e.: –– relying on existing domestic crimes (murder, torture, grievous bodily harm, etc.); –– a general reference to treaties, international law or the laws and customs of war; –– incorporating specific crimes, through cross reference to the relevant treaty or transcribing crimes into domestic law; –– a combination of the second and third approaches; –– direct application of IHL, e.g. through a constitutional provision? 2. Which incorporation method has your State adopted? 3. Where are IHL/ICC crimes incorporated (stand-alone legislation or incorporation in existing legislation)?

B. Other relevant Issues (45 min.) 1. Which categories of persons are covered by IHL/ICC crimes (civilians and/or military)? 2. Which penalties are provided for IHL/ICC crimes? 3. Which tribunals have jurisdiction to deal with IHL/ICC crimes?

C. Integrated approach to incorporation (45 min.) 1. When implementing Article 8 of the Rome Statute (war crimes) in domestic law, has your State also examined and implemented other obligations it might have under IHL, such as: –– general principles of international criminal law; –– IHL crimes as defined in the weapons treaties; –– IHL crimes as defined in treaties related to protected persons or property (e.g. grave breaches of the Geneva ANNEX 3: BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 41

Conventions or Additional Protocol I, the Hague Cultural Property Convention and its Protocols, and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child regarding child soldiers); –– IHL crimes as defined in treaties related to the conduct of hostilities, such as those in Protocol I additional to the Geneva Conventions; or –– serious violations of IHL under customary law?

Working Group 2 (180 min.) – Ways and solutions to address challenges to incorporation There are a number of challenges to the implementation of serious violations of IHL at domestic level. First, it might be difficult for States to have an exact idea of the extent of their obligations when it comes to incorporation of serious viola- tions of IHL into domestic law. Such violations are spread across a number of treaties or might even be only of a customary nature. Similarly, the scope of such prohibitions also varies, covering in some cases the protection of special categories of protected persons or property, and in others means and methods of warfare. States have therefore to identify what these obligations are and identify methods that permit their effective implementation at domestic level in light of available resources. As mentioned above, the Rome Statute might be a good starting point in the identi- fication of obligations but it is not sufficient since it ignores certain grave breaches as well as a series of well-recognized serious violations of IHL applicable to all conflicts, irrespec- tive of their nature.

Second, an effective system of repression of IHL violations means that all those that might have committed such crimes must be subject to prosecution and judgement. This might entail constitutional and criminal law re-arrange- ments to ensure that these crimes are prosecuted regardless of the perpetrator, the victim, the place of the crime or even the time that has elapsed between the crime’s commission and its prosecution. 42 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

Third, one of the most serious challenges to the incorpora- tion of IHL crimes at domestic level is to ensure sustained political will until the passage of domestic legislation or the adoption of other relevant measures. The full incorporation of IHL crimes at domestic level is usually a lengthy process that involves a number of ministries and departments. Legislators also need to be convinced that domestic incor- poration of IHL crimes deserves a space in the legislative calendar. In this regard, external support provided by other States or competent international, regional and non-­ governmental organizations might be useful.

Fourth, the process of incorporation could require the adop- tion of specific regulations and laws to be inserted throughout various legal texts (e.g. penal code, code of criminal procedure, code of military justice), and thus demand the involvement of different ministries, the legis- lature, the armed forces and other technical offices or bodies, as well as National Societies and civil society. As is common in such situations, any action taken would need to be coordinated, and different objectives, levels of ex- pertise and commitment to the final outcome would need to be reconciled.

QUESTIONS A. General (30 min.) 1. How do you determine the extent of your State’s inter- national obligation to criminalize serious violations of IHL? Which tools exist to help you in this regard?

B. Substantive challenges (60 min.) 1. In incorporating the Rome Statute or IHL/ICC crimes at domestic level, has your State had to address constitu- tional challenges? If yes, which ones? How were they addressed? 2. Has the incorporation of IHL/ICC crimes required adjust- ments to your State’s criminal law, in particular the gen- eral principles applicable, including statutory limitations, forms of participation and command responsibility? ANNEX 3: BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 43

If yes, what were the main issues/concerns and how were they addressed? 3. How do you ensure respect for the principles of speci- ficity and legality?

C. Procedural challenges (60 min.) 1. Can you describe the whole process undergone by a draft law on IHL/ICC crimes in your country? Can you specify the most challenging stages and the ways to overcome them? 2. How can effective coordination be ensured between all stakeholders involved in the incorporation of IHL/ICC crimes at domestic level? What specific role might the national IHL committee play in this regard? 3. How can your national IHL committee ensure sustainable political will and a space in the parliamentary timetable for legislation on IHL crimes in the light of competing national priorities??

D. Overcoming challenges through cooperation (30 min) 1. Has your country ever provided technical assistance to other States in their efforts to incorporate IHL/ICC crimes at domestic level? If yes, please describe it. 2. Has your State ever benefited from technical assistance provided by other States or organizations in your effort to incorporate IHL/ICC crimes at domestic level? If yes, please describe it.

Thursday morning Plenary (120 min.) – Tools to assist in the incorporation of IHL crimes There are many tools that can assist and support relevant stakeholders, including national IHL committees, in their efforts to implement an efficient system for the repression of serious violations of IHL or ICC crimes. These may take the form of specific documents on this issue, but may also consist of assistance from various bodies, including other States or a number of international and regional organiza- tions, such as the ICRC. Exchanges between national IHL 44 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

committees of different countries, and with National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, can also be highly productive.

As the ICRC Advisory Service on IHL is specifically tasked to work in this regard, it has produced numerous tools to aid national IHL committees in their tasks, notably: yy fact sheets on particular IHL topics (available on the ICRC website); yy reports of experts meetings / previous meetings of national IHL committees; yy ratification kits to facilitate State adherence to IHL treaties; yy model laws and guidelines; yy country fact sheets (questionnaires listing IHL obligations and other issues States should consider when enacting national law); yy a new publication, The Domestic Implementation of International Humanitarian Law: A Manual (a comprehen- sive guide to domestic implementation); yy a database of national laws and judgements.

Other organizations and institutions, including the ICC itself, have also developed complementary tools to support States’ national implementation of their IHL obligations. These include a number of model laws aiming at implementing the Rome Statute at national level. As another example, in 2005 the Council of the European Union adopted the European Union Guidelines on promoting compliance with international humanitarian law (updated in December 2009). The Guidelines aim to address compliance with IHL by third States and, as appropriate, non-State actors in third States. They supplement the Council’s position on the ICC and EU guidelines and policies on, inter alia, human rights dialogue, torture, and children and armed conflict.

Individual States and their national IHL committees are also available for supporting their counterparts in other coun- tries. At the most recent International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, a number of States pledged to assist ANNEX 3: BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 45

other States in their efforts to implement IHL. Some have offered their assistance to national IHL committees in other countries in capacity building, information exchange, etc. At the recent ICC Review Conference, some States also pledged to provide support to other governments in their adoption of national legislation to implement the Rome Statute.

National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, which are often members of their country’s national IHL committee, can use the network of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement to facilitate the exchange of informa- tion and support for committees. One group providing such support is the European Legal Support Group.

Programme of the session In this session, 90 minutes will be dedicated to presenta- tions from panelists and interventions from the floor. Thirty minutes will then be taken to discuss the questions below with participants.

QUESTIONS 1. Has your national IHL committee / State received as- sistance from other national IHL committees / States / regional or international organizations on national IHL implementation? If so, in what manner? 2. Has your national IHL committee / State given assistance to other national IHL committees / States on national IHL implementation? If so, in what manner? 3. What other forms of cooperation would you like to see to assist with national implementation?

Thursday afternoon Participants will be split into two working groups, the first dealing with forms of jurisdiction, the second considering the preventive role of sanctions.

Working Group 3 (180 min.) – Jurisdictional perspective The last 60 years have seen important developments, in the form of several international treaties, State practice and 46 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

scholarly opinions, towards the view that, for certain inter- national crimes, the exercise of some form of extraterritorial jurisdiction, including universal jurisdiction, is not only permitted but may be required. One of the most striking examples is undoubtedly the “grave breaches” regime found in the four 1949 Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocol I, which provides for a binding obliga- tion upon States to search for and initiate proceedings against suspected offenders present on their territory, regardless of their nationality, the victims’ nationality or where the offence was committed.

Beyond the grave breaches regime, IHL treaties provide for a number of different approaches to jurisdiction, which have more or less extended extraterritorial effects. 1. The first of these – the most restrictive – does not pro- vide for anything and leaves it to the State to decide which measures ought to be taken to ensure that the treaty’s provisions are respected at domestic level and the bases of criminal jurisdiction required in this regard. This approach is found in the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention and the 1925 Gas Protocol. 2. The second approach is a little more specific and extends the obligation to take legal action (including penal measures) against persons or acts committed in the territory under a State’s jurisdiction or control. This approach has been adopted in instruments such as the 1997 Ottawa Convention (the Mine Ban Treaty) and the 2001 Amended Protocol II to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. 3. The third approach refers to acts committed in “any place under [the State’s] control” but also obliges every State, under the active personality principle, to “extend its penal legislation […] to any activity prohibited […] under this Convention undertaken anywhere by natural persons, possessing [the forum State’s] nationality, in conformity with international law.”2 This approach can

2. 1993 Chemical Weapons Conventions, Art. VII(1). ANNEX 3: BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 47

be found in conventions such as the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention. 4. Under the fourth approach, States are obliged to take action when the offence is committed in their territory (thus acting under the territoriality principle), when the alleged offender is a national of the State (active person- ality principle) and, for certain types of offences, when the alleged offender is present in their territory (a form of universal jurisdiction). In this last case, it is further required that, if the State does not extradite that person, it should “submit, without exception whatsoever, and without undue delay, the case to its competent authorities, for the purpose of prosecution”.3 This approach is found in an instrument such as the 1999 Second Protocol to The Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property.

The same approach can be found in human rights treaties. Both the 1984 Convention Against Torture and the 2006 Convention on Enforced Disappearances oblige States to take such measures as may be necessary to establish their jurisdiction in cases where the offence was committed in the territory under their jurisdiction; when the offender is a national of that State; when the victim is a national of that State; and finally, when the alleged offender is present in any territory under the State’s jurisdiction and it does not extradite him.

As for the choice between military and ordinary tribunals, IHL does not distinguish between either solution as long as respect for all essential judicial guarantees is assured.

When adopting an integrated approach to the implementa- tion of the Rome Statute at domestic level, States should reflect on the nature and extent of the bases of jurisdiction that ought to be attached to ICC crimes (since none is mentioned in the Statute) in order to ensure full compliance with any other IHL obligations that might be at stake.

3. 1999 Second Protocol to the Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property, Art. 17(1). 48 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

QUESTIONS A. Bases of jurisdiction (60 min.) 1. Which bases of jurisdiction does your State use for IHL crimes? (See approaches above.) Does your State ­differentiate according to the relevant treaty obligation or tend to use the same basis of jurisdiction for all IHL crimes? 2. In your national legislation, which bases of jurisdiction has been provided for ICC crimes?

B. Judicial regimes and practice (30 min) 1. Which tribunals have jurisdiction to deal with IHL crimes? 2. Do you have any examples of prosecution for IHL/ICC crimes based on some form of extraterritorial jurisdiction in your country?

C. Challenges (90 min.) 1. What are the challenges involved in the exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction? What resources and struc- tures are required to efficiently prosecute IHL/ICC crimes on the basis of extraterritorial jurisdiction? 2. What limits can be placed on the exercise of extraterrito- rial jurisdiction to make it effective? Should particular attention be given to criteria such as: place where the suspect is, double incrimination, primacy of loci delicti commissi (place where the crime was committed), obli- gation to extradite if not prosecuted, etc.?

Working Group 4 (180 min.) – Preventive role of repression/sanction on individual behaviour Knowledge. Having recourse to repression and sanction is also to acknowledge that there has been a failure: a lack of adherence to an IHL rule for which respect is required under the threat of punishment. But the failure might be explained for a number of reasons.

For individuals to comply with such a rule, they first need to know it. Hence, the importance of proscribing in national law the behaviours that are prohibited by IHL and amount ANNEX 3: BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 49

to international crimes. But this is not enough if repression and sanction are to play their preventive role efficiently.

Adherence. Any message about repression and sanction for serious violations of IHL must be accompanied at the outset by measures intended to improve adherence to the rules and respect for them. Necessary measures must be taken by all parties concerned to ensure that the applicable rules and sanctions are integrated into their system of reference, that they are known and properly applied. Individuals should be taught through appropriate educational measures what is permissible and what is not. In fact, the efficiency of the message of sanction depends on the degree to which the prohibited rule has been internalized by those who are likely to violate it, in particular the bearers of weapons. Their training in IHL needs to be integrated to the point that compliance with IHL rules is a genuine reflex reaction.

Characteristics of sanctions. Furthermore, in order for sanc- tion to play an effective preventive role, it must be made public and be subject to appropriate dissemination meas- ures. The dissemination obligation is fundamental because it is the means of informing and educating the general public about what a serious violation is and the conse- quences that it entails. Repression must be certain, applied without delay and without discrimination. This may require the training of judges at national level to ensure that they will not hesitate to recognize their own competence with regard to trying cases involving international crimes.

QUESTIONS A. Maximizing the deterrent effect of sanctions (120 min.) 1. In which texts/instruments should sanctions be found to ensure the maximum deterrent effect? 2. Which bodies should be authorized to deliver sanctions so as to ensure the greatest deterrent effect? –– military/civilian –– international/national/mixed –– others 50 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

3. Do the impact and the role of the sanctions vary, depending on when they are applied (during or after the conflict)? 4. Should sex/gender and age (children) be taken into account to ensure a greater deterrent effect of sanctions? If so, how? 5. How can the deterrent effect of repression/sanction be increased?

B. Education and dissemination about sanctions (60 min) 1. What training should be required of prosecutors and judges dealing with violations of IHL/ICC crimes? 2. How is the existence and practice of international crim- inal tribunals disseminated to key audiences (including weapons bearers) in your national context? 3. What role can national IHL committees play in the dis- semination and educational measures to make sanctions better known?

Friday morning Plenary session (120 min.) – Enhanced role of national IHL committees The role of national IHL committees has generally been to act as advisory bodies to governments on IHL matters, to promote, advise on and coordinate all matters relating to the legal implementation of IHL at the national level and to promote compliance with and development of the law. Having knowledge of the current status of the State’s rati- fication and implementation of IHL treaties, national bodies are well positioned to encourage the ratification of or adherence to such legal instruments and advance their incorporation into domestic law. They can also work for the harmonization of national legislation, regulations and other measures with the international instruments of IHL to which the State is willing to be bound. ANNEX 3: BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 51

They should also be in a position to evaluate existing national legislation, judicial decisions and administrative provisions in the light of the obligations stemming from the various IHL instruments, to submit advisory opinions to the national authorities on issues relating to the implementa- tion of IHL, and to formulate recommendations and pro- posals in this regard.

QUESTIONS (for panelists and participants alike) A. Structure of the national IHL committee (60 min) 1. How is your national committee structured? For example, who are its members? Is it linked to the executive branch of the government? 2. What are the connections between your committee and other important national stakeholders, including legisla- tors, the armed forces and civil society?

B. Functions of the committee (60 min.) 1. What are the functions entrusted to your national committee? 2. What challenges does your committee face in carrying out its functions, and how can its work be improved? 4. TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS ON CRIMINAL SANCTIONS IN IHL AND RELATED PROVISIONS *

* This table is clearly not exhaustive. For example, it does not take into account all the ­implementing legislation relating to specific topics of IHL and related norms, such as weapons, children or cultural property. It does not reflect the possibility the States have to apply ordinary criminal law or to apply international law directly, in respect of both the grounds for incrimination and the exercise of universal jurisdiction. Various sources were consulted to complete the table, including the reports submitted by States to supplement the reports of the United Nations Secretary General on universal jurisdiction and those provided in the context of the Third Universal Meeting of National Committees for the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law. 54 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 4

universal jurisdiction p n on the territory of the State or in a jurisdiction its under place surrender to the ICC

Conditions for/restrictions on LIRS, Art. 1) resence of the alleged offender 2) o possibility of extradition or I)

3(d)

genocide war crimes crimes against humanity crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction • • • LIRS, Art. General reference: • LIRS, Arts 2 and 3(c) references:Specific 8,

despoliation of wounded, sick or shipwrecked in a military zone misusein time of war, in a military zone of the emblems mentioned in violation of international conventions, in the laws and customs of war genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts)

CMJ, Arts 287 and 299 references:Specific LIRS, Arts 2 and 10 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • • • , April

January

, 9 26.200 on the

, promulgated on No.

December 2006,

Decree of 28-71 22 1971 (CMJ) Law the of implementation Rome of Statute the Criminal International Court 13 oficial Boletín 2007 (LIRS) Reference text(s) Code of Military Justice State Algeria Argentina ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 55 universal jurisdiction the Attorney-General.the

Conditions for/restrictions CC, Section 268.121 Prosecution must be commenced on by I)

15.4 and 268.117 and 268.117 15.4

15(3)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes

Universal jurisdiction CC, Art. General reference: Crimes the State is obliged to repress internationalwhich the treatiesunder to it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional CC, Sections references:Specific • • • I)

8, 8,

390(6)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts)

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CC, Arts 390(1-5)-397CC, references:Specific • • • CC, Art. General reference: Other violations of the norms of IHL provided for in international treaties binding on Armenia (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol CC, Division 268 references:Specific • • • , , , Official 25 (260),

12, 1995 (CC),12,

42, 2002 , No.

No.

No.

May 2003 (CC)

2 Law as amended by the Criminal International (ConsequentialCourt Amendments) Act Act Reference text(s) Code Criminal Gazette Criminal Code Act State Armenia Australia 56 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 65:

universal jurisdiction p d n p a s t u t t territory that prescribed by the law of the country in which the crime was committed another State; or pardoned or the offence is time-barred; crime was committed, prosecution could proceed only at the request of the injured party, and such is not case;the mentioned above); whole or in part by another State.

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. 1) resence of the accused on the 2) 3) ouble criminality 4) o possibility of extradition unishment no more severe than 1) entence has been served in 2) he defendant has been acquitted 3) nder the law of the State where the 4) here is no double criminality (as 5) he sentence was suspended in Prosecution does not proceed if: proceed not does Prosecution I)

64(6) 65

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol the law applies under certain conditions to foreigners who have committed a crime abroad.

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. General reference: • PC, Art. General reference: • 321

genocide

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute PC, Art. reference:Specific • , January 1974 January 1974 ,

60, 29

No. (PC) Reference text(s) Penal Code Bundesgesetzblatt State Austria ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 57 universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on I)

12.3 12.3

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction CC, Art. references:Specific • • • CC, Art. General reference: • ) I, I,

8,

116.0.16

232)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) use of a weapon, means or method of warfare that is forbidden by which internationalthe treaties to Azerbaijan is party (1949 Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocol Rome Statute) crimes against humanity (torture, Art. war crimes: unlawful seizure of a dead or wounded soldier’s property war crimes (despoliation of the dead or wounded; violence against a combatant who is wounded combat de or hors

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CC, Arts 102-119 references:Specific • • • CC, Art. General reference: • PC, Arts 232 and 380 references:Specific • • • MCC, Arts and 102 101 reference:Specific , 15 of 15

, No.

, 3

N

September 2000 (CC)

1 Decree Law as amended 1976, by the 2005 Law promulgating Code Penal the (PC) Code Criminal Military Law o. 2002 4, (MCC) Reference text(s) Code Criminal Penal Code State Azerbaijan Bahrain 58 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 6(4)

universal jurisdiction n p Belarus

Conditions for/restrictions GCA, Section 3(3) consent the without No proceedings in writing of the Director of Public Prosecutions on PC, Art. 1) 2) o conviction in another State rosecution on the territory of 6(3)

grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions genocide crimes against humanity war crimes

Universal jurisdiction • PC, Art. references:Specific • • • GCA, Section 3 reference:Specific I)

8,

129

war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) weapons of mass destruction and other weapons prohibited by the treaties to which the State is party (1949 Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocol

GCA, Sections 3 and 9 reference:Specific and 130-138 128 PC, Arts 127, references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • • PC, Art. General reference: • , , June

, 24 , supplement September 1980

Penal Code Geneva Conventions Act Conventions Geneva 22 (GCA) (PC) 1999 1980 – 401980 to the Official Gazette Reference text(s)

Belarus State Barbados ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 59 12bis

universal jurisdiction t t a i are not qualified as crimes under the PC or in an international treaty binding on Belgium; complaint; the from or that the case be tried before an international or foreign court.

Conditions for/restrictions on Art.CCP, Prosecution initiated by the Federal Prosecutor The proceedings are mandatory, unless: 1) 2) he complaint is clearly unfounded; he matters raised in the complaint 3) n admissible case cannot result 4) t is in the interests of justice I)

12bis

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction CCP, Art.CCP, General reference: • 8,

5 and PC, Arts 136bis to

genocide war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts)

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute AGBIHL, Art. 136quater references:Specific • • , Official , Official June April 1878

286. 286, August

, 8 , 17 August 2003

, No. , No. Act of 5 August 2003 (PC) August 2003 (AGBIHL)

Gazette Gazette 1867, as amended by 1867, the 2003 to grave relating international of breaches law humanitarian 7 Act of 5 to grave relating international of breaches law humanitarian 7 containingLaw the of Introductory Title the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) Reference text(s) Penal Code State Belgium 60 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on I) I)

1(7)

1(7)

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction CC, Art. General reference: • MPC, Art. General reference: • 67

11 11

genocide attack on, destruction or looting of hospitals, places of worship, museums and libraries violation of the standards set out in international treatment the treaties for of prisoners of war violation of international treaties and conventions misuse of the emblem as a protective device including in time of war, perfidy

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CC, Arts and 138 137 reference:Specific • MPC, Art. reference:Specific • • • LE, Art. reference:Specific • MPC, Arts 66 and 69 General references: , , May

, 23 , June 2002,

1768 of 1768 2390 on the use

2494 of

No. No.

2407, 19 2407, No.

January (MPC) 1976

March 1997, March 1997,

3 (LE) August 2003 (CC)

Law 10 as amended by Act 4 Military Penal Code 22 Law and of protection the red emblem cross 2002, Gaceta oficial No. p. Reference text(s) Code Criminal State Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 61

3(3)

12(4)

universal jurisdiction d c five years in prison in the country where it was committed

Conditions for/restrictions on CC, Art. 1) 2) ouble criminality rime subject to a penalty of at least GCA, Art. Prosecution initiated by the Attorney-General I)

3(2)

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions

Universal jurisdiction • GCA, Art. reference:Specific • CC, Arts 12(1)(c) and 12(4) General reference: 3(1)

179

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Art.8 of the Rome Statute considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) violation of the laws and customs of war war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CC, Arts 171-184 references:Specific • • • CC, Art. crimes:General war reference for • GCA, Art. reference:Specific •

, 237

osnia­ ­ B January

, Official , 24 28,

(Supplement F), No.

36/03 (CC)

August p. 1970,

Geneva Conventions Act Conventions Geneva Criminal Code of ‌ Herzegovina 2003 (as amended), Official Gazette No. Law 26 (GCA) Reference text(s) Gazette Botswana State Bosnia- Herzegovina 62 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES ) ne bis in idem 2

7(I)(d) 7(II)(2)

the territorythe territory national the

universal jurisdiction p d e n t p on law sentence already served for the same offence ( on

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. specific the of respect Condition in genocide:reference to the alleged offender must reside permanently territory the on the of State. PC, Art. respect Conditions in reference: general the of 1) resence of the alleged offender 2) 3) ouble criminality xtraditable crime under Brazilian 4) o judgment, acquittal abroad or Art.LCT, respect Conditions in reference: general the of 1) 2) he victim is Brazilian resence of the alleged offender I)

2

7(I)(d) 7(II)

genocide crimes the State is obliged to repress which international treatiesunder to it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Protocol Additional and the law applies when the crime is committed outside the national territory.

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. reference:Specific • PC, Art. General reference: • Art.LCT, General reference: •

1

407-408

genocide genocide war crimes (acts of violence against property and individuals sexual and violence)

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute LG, Art. reference:Specific • and references:Specific • • CMJ, Arts 208, 402, 401, 403-404 , 9455, , 1001, 1001,

No. No.

, Decree 2848, 2889,

, Law No. No.

October 1969 (CMJ)

December 1940 (PC) October 1956 (LG) April (LCT) 1997

Law 7 Code of Military Justice Decree Law 21 on GenocideLaw Law 1 on of the Crime Law Torture 7 Reference text(s) Penal Code State Brazil ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 63 24

15

3(2)

universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. Compliance with international rules on immunities LIRS, Art. Presence of the alleged offender on territorythe LGCHWC, Art. Overwhelming evidence required I)

15

6(1) 6(2)

crimes against peace and humanity crimes the State is obliged to repress which international treatiesunder to it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Protocol Additional and genocide crimes against humanity war crimes genocide crimes against humanity war crimes

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. reference:Specific • PC, Art. General reference: • LIRS, Art. references:Specific • • • LGCHWC, Arts 21 and 24 references:Specific • • • 8, 8,

415

8)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) methods and means of warfare international law by prohibited genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art.

LGCHWC, Arts 2, 3 and 4 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute PC, Arts 404-418 references:Specific • • • PC, Art. crimes:General war reference for • LIRS, Arts and 19 17 16, references:Specific • • • • • • May

32, 5, ,

April

, Bulletin 009/AN , No. , No. 2 26, 2 -

5/2003 , Official

052 of 8 1/1004

, No. , No. No. No.

April (PC) 2010

December 2009, February (LIRS) 2010

officiel 1968, amended by Official Gazette 27 Law implementation the on of the Rome Statute 3 4 Law suppression the 2003 on of genocide,of the crime againstcrimes humanity and war crimes (LGCHWC) Reference text(s) Penal Code Gazette Official Journal Burkina Faso Burundi State Bulgaria 64 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 10

universal jurisdiction r a d p e the territory and no possibility of extradition that prescribed by the law of the country in which the crime was committed Public Prosecutor on the basis of a complaint official an or denunciation by the country where the crime was committed

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. 1) 2) esidence of the alleged offender rrest of the alleged offender on 3) 4) ouble criminality unishment no more severe than 5) xclusive prosecution by the 10

the Penal Code Penal the certain under applies conditions to foreigners who have committed a crime abroad.

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. General reference: • 8,

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) war crimes (despoliation of a dead or injured person, acts of violence against certain protected persons, pillage, the emblem) of misuse genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (injury of protected persons, despoliation of the dead or wounded, hostage-taking, torture, mutilation, cruelty, perfidy, pillage, reprisals, attack protected property)on

CMJ, Arts 221 216, and 241 reference:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute LEEC, Arts 5 and 4, 6 references:Specific • • • • • • • • • • CC, Arts and 193 188, 183, 194 references:Specific Decree, Arts 32, 33 31, and 35 references:Specific , , , 2007/199 2007/199 ,

67-LF-1 of 67-LF-1

No.

No. July 2007, onJuly the 2007,

November 2009 (CC) October 2004 NS/ June 1967 (PC) April and 1975

January 1979) (LEEC) March 1928 (CMJ)

27 (for RKM/1004/006 acts committed between 17 6 Code Criminal 30 Law 12 Code of Military Justice 9 Decree of 7 general rules of discipline in the defence forces Reference text(s) on the Law Establishment of the Chambers Extraordinary Penal Code State Cambodia Cameroon ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 65 universal jurisdiction p no in writing of the Attorney the writing of in General or Deputy Attorney General Canada of

Conditions for/restrictions CHWCA, Sections 8(b) and 9(3) on 1) 2) resence of the accused in Canada consent the without proceedings 38

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes if the crime is committed abroad, the Court having jurisdiction is the one of the State where the alleged offender is present or resident. If it is not possible to determine the presence or residence of the alleged offender, the court having jurisdiction is the one that had first knowledge of the crime.

Universal jurisdiction • • • Art.CCP, General reference: • CHWCA, Section 6(1) references:Specific 8,

4

278

8)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art. war crimes under customary or treaty- based international law applicable in conflictsarmed genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) acts committed in violation of the international bind conventions which State and which relate to the conduct of hostilities, the protection of wounded, sick and shipwrecked, the treatment of prisoners and the of war, protection of civilians and property in the event of armedwar, conflict or occupation

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CHWCA, Section 4 and Annex references:Specific • • • CHWCA, Art. General reference for war crimes: • CC, Arts 265-278 references:Specific • • • CC, Art. General reference: • , , Legislative, 4/2003, 2/2005,

, Legislative No. No.

November 2003 (CC)

February 2005 (CCP)

Criminal Code Criminal Decree 18 Code of Criminal Procedure Decree 7 S.C. 2000, chap. 24 (CHWCA) Reference text(s) Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes Act Cape Verde Cape State Canada 66 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on I)

9

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction CL, Art. General reference: • 8,

87

war crimes (misuse of the emblem, looting, destruction of buildings, despoliation of the dead and wounded) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) war crimes (acts of violence against protected persons, pillage)

LCHGWC, Arts 1-34 references:Specific CL, Arts 446 and 448 reference:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CMJ, Art. reference:Specific • • • • • , March

July

July 2009

20.357 on 20.357 25-62 of

, 18 , adopted by the No. No.

December 1962

Act 18 (CMJ) Law Crimes against Humanity, Genocide and War Crimes (LCHGWC) Congress on 1 1979; amended by the Fifth Session of the Eighth National People’s Congress on 14 (CL) 1997 Reference text(s) Code of Military Justice Criminal Law of the Criminal Law RepublicPeople’s of China Second Session of the Fifth National People’s State Chad Chile China ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 67 ne bis 16(6)(a-d)

idem

universal jurisdiction p n p s t r on the territory Attorneythe General prison under Colombian law in

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. 1) resence of the alleged perpetrator 2) 3) o possibility of extradition roceedings must be engaged by 4) entence of at least 3 years in 5) 6) he offence is not political in nature espect for the principle GCA, Section 5(5) The Attorney-General leave give must instituteto proceedings. I

16(6)

criminal law applies under certain conditions to foreigners who have committed a crime abroad grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. General reference: • GCA, Section 5 reference:Specific •

8, 8,

I)

genocide war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) war crimes (grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute PC, Arts 101, 102, 135-164, 367, 367A 367A 367, PC, Arts 135-164, 102, 101, and 367B references:Specific • • • • • GCA, Sections 5 and 10 reference:Specific • LDRIC, Arts 1-9 references:Specific 599

July ,

July 44.097, 44.097,

No.

Diario

, No. 747 of 747 , war crimes , Law 44.872,

9

- (LDRIC) 759 of 25 890 of 7 (GCA)6 of 2011 8

No.

, No. July 2000, , as amended by

No. No. No. No.

45.602,

July 2000, amended October on 1998 the July 2002, July 2002, and

July 2004 (PC)

oficial Diario oficial Diario of 24 24 by Law 19 19 Law 2002, amended by Law oficial Diario 2004, No. 7 Law 31 repression and definition genocide of 8 of and against crimes humanity Law Reference text(s) Penal Code Geneva Conventions and Additional Act Protocols 2002 State Colombia Congo Cook Islands Cook 68 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES ) universal jurisdiction p c n on the territory instituted only by the State offender has already been tried or acquitted in a third State (respect for the principle ne bis in idem

Conditions for/restrictions Residence on PC, Arts 8 and 10 1) resence of the alleged perpetrator 2) riminal proceedings may be 3) o prosecution if the alleged 11 I, Rome Statute)

7 7

genocide all grave violations of IHL within the meaning of the treaties to which the State is party or of the PC (1949 Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocol crimes not justified by the laws and customs of war committed by enemy nationals or their agents from the start of hostilities against a refugee or a stateless person residing on the territory Côte of d’Ivoire soldier a or serving in the army of Côte d’Ivoire

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. reference:Specific • PC, Art. General reference: • MPPC, Art. reference:Specific • 378 8

crimes:

war genocide crimes against humanity perfidy all grave violations of IHL within the meaning of the treaties binding on the State and relating to the conduct of hostilities, the protection of the wounded, sick and shipwrecked, the treatment of prisoners of war and the protection of civilians and cultural property genocide war crimes(in the case of international armed conflicts: acts of violence against civilians and prisoners of pillage, misusewar, of the emblem, despoliation of the dead and wounded)

PC, Arts 137-139, 464,PC, 465 Arts and 473 137-139, references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute PC, Arts 375 and 379 references:Specific • • EL, Art. reference:Specific • PC, Art. General reference related to • • • 97, 97,

May

, Journal Journal , No. 75 (EL)

74-350

October

No. 55, special November 1995-522 November , ,

No.

, 19 4573 of 8272 of 2 1981-640 of 8031 on8031 the use

No.

, No. July 1974, July 1974, , Law

No. No. No. No. July 1995 (PC)

210, 2 210,

May 2002 (PC) July 1981, amendedJuly 1981, November 1970,

6

officiel Law 15 as amended by Law 2002, Gaceta La 22 Law and of protection the red crescent red and cross emblems Gaceta La 2000, No. 2000, rank Law 31 by Law of Military Penal Procedure Code of 24 issue of 26 1974 (MPPC) Reference text(s) Penal Code Penal Code State Costa Rica Côte d’Ivoire Côte ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 69 10(2)(3)

universal jurisdiction p a n n g s t a i by the Attorney the by General territory of Croatia (including by extradition) other competent tribunal (except if those proceedings are contrary accepted internationally fair-trial to standards) or war crimes minimum of five years in the country where the crime was committed in another State time-barred proceedings can be instituted only if the victim filed a complaint and such complaint has not been filed

Conditions for/restrictions on LICC, Art. 1) roceedings must be commenced 2) rrest in and presence on the 3) 4) o possibility of extradition o proceedings before the ICC or 1) enocide, crimes against humanity 2) entence of imprisonment of a 1) he sentence has been served in full 2) cquittal, pardon or prosecution 3) n the country where the crime CC, Arts 14(4) and 16 if: prosecution No 1 and 10(2)

14(4)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes criminal law applies under certain conditions to foreigners who have committed a crime outside Croatia.

Universal jurisdiction LICC, Arts references:Specific • • • CC, Art. General reference: • 8,

156-176 163

crimes:

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes: (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) means and methods of warfare international law by prohibited

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CC, Arts references:Specific • • • CC, Art. concerning reference General war • 175 of 175 , Official

110, 110, 27/98,

51/2001,

No.

111/2003,

, No. , No. No. 129/2000, , Law

December February 1998, October 1997, October 1997, July 2003 (CC) October 2003 (LICC)

June 2001,

17 Code Criminal Gazette 21 amended by Official Gazette 27 No. 22 2000, No. 6 and 15 Reference text(s) on the Law the of Implementation Rome of Statute the Criminal International Court and the Prosecution of Crimes against the of International Law Humanitarian and War Law State Croatia 70 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 5(3) and (5)

universal jurisdiction t p n d p which, international crimes may be repressed are they if prosecuted by the general principles of law international the by recognized community and authorized by the Attorney General territorythe case of crimes against humanity or against human dignity the Minister of Justice

Conditions for/restrictions on 4) here is no double criminality, failing PC, Art. 1) resence of the alleged offender on 2) 3) o possibility of extradition ouble criminality, except in the 4) rosecution only at the request of I)

5(3) 5(3)

crimes against humanity criminal law applies under certain conditions to foreigners who have committed a crime outside Cuba crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol genocide war crimes crimes against humanity

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. reference:Specific • PC, Art. General reference: • • RSRL, Sections 3 and 6 references:Specific • • • 8)

116.1

genocide war crimes (acts of violence against protected persons) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art.

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute RSRL, Sections 2 and 3 references:Specific PC, Art. reference:Specific • • • • • LMC, Arts 42–45 reference:Specific , 62

2

6, 1, 1, , 111 111

No.

, No. , No. 87 of , Law

22 of 8(III)/2002 on 23(III)/2006

No.

No. No. No.

February 1999, March 1999, p. February 1979,

March 1999, p.

Penal Code of 1987, as amended of 1987, by Law 16 Gaceta oficial extraordinaria 15 (PC) Crimes on Military Law Law 15 Gaceta oficial 5 (LMC) Law the Rome for Statute the Establishment of the Criminal International Court (Ratification) Law as amended by Reference text(s) (RSRL) Cuba Cuba Cyprus State Croatia (continued) ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 71 7:

10(1)

3

universal jurisdiction d p n p s e c the territorythe prison under Congolese law proceedings institute to Prosecutor denunciation the country by where the crime was committed, if against an individual and the maximum penalty in the DRC is at least five years

Conditions for/restrictions on Art.CPP, Conditions in respect of all international for proceedings: respect rules related to immunities PC, Art. of respect Conditions in 1) 2) ouble criminality 3) territory the on resence o possibility of extradition PC, Art. 1) resence of the alleged offender on 2) entence of at least two months in 3) xclusive authority of the Public 4) omplaint of the victim or official 100

7(1) 7(1) 3

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes all crimes, under certain conditions the military courts are competent with regard to anybody who has perpetrated any act under their abroad. jurisdiction penal law applies under certain conditions to foreigners who have committed a crime abroad.

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. references:Specific • • • PC, Art. General reference: • MJC, Art. General reference: • PC, Art. General reference: • 8, 8,

71

411

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) all means or method of combat IHL under prohibited genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) prohibition to enlist or use children under the age of 18

MJC, Arts 63, 65, 85, 164-173 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute PC, Arts 400-418 Arts PC, references:Specific • • • PC, Art. General reference: • • • • LPC, Art. reference:Specific • , , 141 141

No. November

, special , , Decree of , Act March 2003

422/2002 (CPP)

40/2009, 306/2009 (PC) 024/2002 of

November

No.

No. No. No. January 1940 as November 2004 (PC)

November 2002,

Act as amended by Act Code of Penal Procedure of 29 as amended1961, by Law 30 modified and completed, updated on 30 Journal officiel 2004, 30 Code Criminal Military Act 18 Journal officiel issue, 20 (MCC) 45th special year, issue, Reference text(s) Penal Code Penal Code State Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) 72 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES non bis in idem 8(6)

universal jurisdiction r i d p third country is refused of one year in prison principle (in case of conviction, the alleged offender must have served the sentence, obtained a pardon, or the sentence must be time-barred)

Conditions for/restrictions on 5) espect for the CC, Art. 1) f the transfer of the accused to a 2) 3) ouble criminality rescribed sentence of a minimum I)

8(5) 8(6)

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol criminal law applies under certain conditions to foreigners who have committed outside crime a Denmark.

Universal jurisdiction CC, Art. General reference: • CC, Art. General reference: • 132; MPC,132; Arts 36(1)

36(1)

1; CC,1; Art.

crimes:

all violations of the country’s laws that are committed during wartime and that are not justified by the laws and customs war of genocide misuse of the emblem pillage use of means or methods of warfare international an by prohibited agreement signed by Denmark or by international customary law

MCC, 173 General reference: Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • GL, Art. and 38 references:Specific • • • MPC, Art. concerning reference General war • , June ,

April April

1034 of

, special , 50th , No.

, 909 of March 2003

530 of 24 January 2009

023/2002 of 09/001 of

No. December 2005

No.

No. No. October 2009 (CC) September 2005,

January 2009, November 2002,

Act 18 Journal officiel issue, 20 (MJC) on the Protection Law of the Child Act 10 Journal officiel specialyear, issue, first part, 12 (LPC) Order 27 as amended by Laws Nos 1389 and 1400 of 21 and by Law 29 Military Penal Code Law (MPC)2005 of 29 No.132 Law concerning1955 the punishment of genocide (GL) Criminal Code Criminal Reference text(s) JudicialMilitary Code Denmark State Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (continued) ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 73 ). ne bis in idem 18(6)

5

universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. Arrest or extradition of the alleged offender on/to territory the State the of Art.CPP, The alleged offender is not prosecuted in another State ( I)

18(6)

5(5) and (6)

crimes against international law against crimes crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party international law against crimes crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. General references: • • Art.CPP, General references: • • 8,

602.56

war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) use of means and methods of warfare prohibited by IHL war crimes (ordinary crimes (murder, assault and battery, etc.) committed during an armed conflict against wounded civilians, theft of the wounded) plunder of dead, wounded or sick combatants, destruction property of

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute PC, Arts 602.37-602.61 reference:Specific • PC, Art. General reference: • PC, Arts and 317(9) 251bis reference:Specific • • MCJ, and 168 167 Arts 141, 136, reference:Specific , , 58 ,

No. May

January , ,

May 2010

, Supreme , Law 25/1966, 16/2007 (MCJ)

aimed at defining No. No.

S-147, 22 S-147, 196, 19

January 1997, January 1997, January 2000 (CPP)

Registro oficial 20 Registro oficial No. as amended by the 1997, Law to reform the Penal Code crimes committed In the performance of military service or in the service of the police, 10 2010, Registro oficial No. (PC) Code of Penal Procedure 13 of promulgating 1937 the Code,Penal amended as (PC) Military Code of Justice Law as amended by Law Reference text(s) Penal Code Court resolution of Penal Code State Ecuador Egypt 74 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 11

universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. Priority is given to prosecution in the State where the crime was committed if the State in question submits a claim in this regard before proceedings are instituted in El Salvador. 10

the criminal law of El Salvador is applicable to crimes committed outside El Salvador that affect property international protected by norms or agreements or universally recognized rights. human

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. General reference: • 8,

8,

genocide war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) genocide war crimes: (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL) violation of international law or of the customs war of

PC, Arts 361-363 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • • • MJC, Arts 69, 70 and 73 references:Specific PC, Arts 362 and 363 General reference: The fact of a civilian not subject to military jurisdiction committing violations of IHL against prisoners or hostages of the woundedwar, or sick, or the fact of committing inhumane acts against a civilian population May May , 335,

, Diario 203, 29 1030 of 562 of 5 ,

105, vol.105,

No. No.

, No. 97, vol. 97,

April 1997, April 1997, June (PC) 1997

oficial Decree 26 10 Military Justice Code Decree 1964, oficial Diario No. 1964 (MJC) Reference text(s) Penal Code State SalvadorEl ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 75 universal jurisdiction a n n i p third country proceedings can be instituted only if the victim filed a complaint and such complaint has not been filed Minister of Justice before instituting proceedings

Conditions for/restrictions on CC, Arts and 19 17 1) bsence of a final judgment in a 2) 3) o possibility of extradition 4) o pardon or statute of limitations n the country where the crime 5) rior consultation required with the If the penalty for the crime in Ethiopia differs from the penalty in the State where the crime was committed, the most favourable penalty is to be applied. I)

17(a) 8

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (in particular IHL and rightshuman treaties) international law against crimes international crimes specified in Ethiopian legislation crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. General reference: • CC, Art. General references: • • • 8,

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (grave breaches and other violations of IHL, also in non- international armed conflicts)

PC, Arts 88-109 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • CC, Arts 269-283 references:Specific • • • (official , , RT 414/2004 (CC)

September 2002, as

1 amended (PC) No. Reference text(s) Penal Code journal) 364, I 2001, 61, Criminal Code Criminal 2005, Proclamation State Estonia Ethiopia 76 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES universal jurisdiction n p conviction by the ICC written the without commenced consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions

Conditions for/restrictions CC, Section Chap. 1, 12 Prosecution ordered by the Prosecutor-General on CD, Sections and 100 101 1) o prosecution if acquittal or 2) roceedings must not be GCP, SectionGCP, 5 Proceedings must not be commenced without the written consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions I I)

genocide crimes against humanity grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol genocide crimes against humanity war crimes

Universal jurisdiction CD, Section 99 references:Specific • • • • 627 Decree references:Specific • • • CC, Section Chap. 1, 7 General reference: GCP, SectionGCP, 3 reference:Specific 8,

I)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts)

CC, Chap. 11, SectionsCC, Chap. 1-14 11, references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CD, Sections 77-97 references:Specific • • • • • • GCP, SectionsGCP, 3 and 4 reference:Specific , , , 52 7

, No. No.

44 of 2009,

100 100

2077, as 2077, 39/1889 of 940/2008 (CC)

No. , extraordinary

December

No. No.

7, No. 7,

December 1889,

November 2009 (CD) September 1996

Criminal Code Criminal Promulgation Fiji Republicof 2007, Gazette vol. of 29 p. 2007, amended in 2008 by Promulgation (GCP) 2009 Decree Crimes Decree 4 Law 19 as amended by Law on Decree 627/1996 of implementation the Chapter I, Section 7 of the Criminal Code 1 (Decree 627) Reference text(s) Conventions Geneva 2007 Promulgation Finland State Fiji ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 77 universal jurisdiction u d p n the State where the crime was committed is party to the Rome Statute Prosecutor Public competent tribunal

Conditions for/restrictions CCP, ArtsCCP, 689-11 GCA, Section 1(3) Prosecution instituted by or on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions on 1) 2) sual residence ouble criminality alternatively, or, 3) rosecution at the request of the 4) o request by the ICC or any other crimes under the jurisdiction of the ICC grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions

Universal jurisdiction • • CCP, ArtsCCP, 689-11 General reference: GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific 8,

7

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute LICC, Art. references:Specific • • • GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific • , , 30 9 - 2010-930 of

1301 of 1301 , as amended

2010

No.

No.

, Journal officiel No. August 2010 August 2010

July 1959 August (LICC) 2010

August (CCP) 2010

The (UnitedThe Kingdom) Geneva Conventions Act 1957 (GCA) GenevaThe Conventions Act (Colonial Territories) inOrder Council 1959 Law of 9 adapting criminal law to include provisions of the Criminal International Court 10 Code of Criminal Procedure by Law 9 Order 28 Reference text(s)

Gambia State France 78 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 153(c) and (f)

5(1) 5(3)

universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on CC, Art. For stateless persons in residing Georgia: double criminality (CC and the State where the crime was committed) and no conviction in another country CC, Art. Not convicted in another country Art.CCP, discretion Prosecutorial I) I)

1

5(1) 5(3) 6(9)

penal law applies under certain conditions to foreigners who have committed a crime abroad. crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol genocide crimes against humanity war crimes crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction CC, Art. General reference: • CC, Art. General reference: • Art. CCAIL, references:Specific • • • PC, Art. General reference: • 8, 8,

I)

413(d)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) all other war crime covered by the Rome Statute and not punishable under CC, Arts 411(e) or 412(e) (Rome Statute, 1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts)

CC, Arts 406-413(a-c) references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • CC, Art. General reference: • CCAIL, Sections 6-12 references:Specific • • • I, I,

, Part , Part , June 2002, , promulgated promulgated ,

41 (48)41 of 1999, June 2002,

November 1998,

No.

42, 29 , 25

3322 (PC)

Code of Crimes International against Law Law as amended in 2006 (CC) Bundesgesetzblatt No. pp. 2254-2260 (CCAIL) Penal Code on 13 Bundesgesetzblatt p. Reference text(s) Code Criminal Germany State Georgia ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 79 universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on I I)

grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol genocide crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction GCA, Section 1(1)(4) reference:Specific • CA, Section 56(4)(e) reference:Specific • • CA, Section 56(4)(n) General reference: I)

genocide war crimes (grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional

CC, Section 49A reference:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific I, I,

459

, Part , Part , No.

646,

January

No. October 2008, , Act

, 1987, , 1987,

, 780th Act of 372, Section

7 (amended by No.

1074, amended by the 1074, (CCP)2149

p. Law of 31 Bundesgesetzblatt p. 2003, Act Art. Act 3) (CC) Conventions Geneva Act 2009 Parliament, 6 2009 (GCA) Courts Act of 1993 (CA) Reference text(s) Code of Criminal Procedure Bundesgesetzblatt Criminal Code (Amendment) Act State Germany (continued) Ghana 80 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on I) I)

8 5(5)

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. General reference: • PC, Art. General reference: • 8,

378 12

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) genocide perfidy violation of humanitarian norms, laws and agreements prisoners related to of war or the wounded, inhumane acts against the civilian population or hospitals

LRS, Arts 7-13 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • PC, Arts 376 and 377 reference:Specific • DE, Art. reference:Specific • PC, Art. General reference: • , , 78,

April

, , No. , , 71, 5 71,

1492 of 3948/2011 3948/2011

No. No.

A, No.

July (PC) 1973 October 1997, October 1997, November (DE) 1997 August 1950 (PC)

Law 17 Law amending domestic law to include the provisions of the Rome Statute vol. 2011 (LRS) 27 Decree on the protection and the use of the red emblem cross Decree 102-97 of 21 oficial Boletín 18 Government Gazette Reference text(s) Penal Code Penal Code of Decree 17-73 State Greece Guatemala ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 81 5(5)

universal jurisdiction p p i r the territorythe in the State where the crime was committed if the State in question submits a request in this regard before the start of criminal proceedings General immunity

Conditions for/restrictions on CC, Art. 1) resence of the alleged offender on 2) riority is given to prosecution CC, Arts 4(3) and 5 1) ndictment ordered by the Attorney 2) espect for international rules on I) I)

5(5) 4 4

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol genocide crimes against humanity war crimes all other crimes that are punishable under an international treaty to which the State is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction CC, Art. General reference: • CC, Art. references:Specific • • • CC, Art. General reference: • 8,

319

genocide acts hospitals, violence against of cultural property, prisoners of war or property, despoliation of the wounded prisonersor genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. partially applicable in international armed conflicts, applicability in non- international armed conflictsunclear) genocide crimes against humanity

LHRC, Arts 7-9 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CC, Art. reference:Specific • • CC, Arts 155-165 references:Specific • • • • • CMJ, Arts 112-114 CMJ, Arts 112-114 reference:Specific , , 4026

, , , 2000, , No. 144-83 of

26 of 2000

No.

No. 208, additional

January 1906 (CMJ) September 1983 (CC) November 2000, December (CC) 1978

Act IV of 1978 on Act IV of 1978 Code Criminal the Decree 26 Code of Military Justice 22 31 Law Establishing the Ad hoc Human Court Rights 23 State Gazette No. State Gazette (LHRC) Reference text(s) Code Criminal Hungary Indonesia State Honduras 82 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 1

universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on SICT, Art. IraqPermanent residence in ICCA, Section 9 Consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions I

1 3

8(2)(b)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes crimes listed in the Rome Statute offences against the administration of (ICC)justice grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions other grave violations of IHL applicable in international armed conflicts and stipulated in the Rome Statute, Art. grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction SICT, Art. references:Specific • • • ICCA, Section 12 references:Specific • • • • GCA, Art. reference:Specific • 8, 3

I)

61

8) 8, and grave breaches of the 1949

war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art. genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art. Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute MPL, Art. reference:Specific • • • • ICCA, Section GCA, 6 and 7; Art. references:Specific • • • SICT, Arts 11, 12 and 13 SICT, 12 Arts 11, references:Specific May

11 11

, 1998, , Official , No. 10 of 10

October

No.

, Law 19, 200719, (MPL) 30 of 2006, 35 of 1998

, 18 No. No. No.

October 2006 (ICCA) July 1968 and 1

International Criminal Criminal International Court Act 2006 Law Resolution 2005 establishing the of the Supreme Iraqi Law Tribunal Criminal (SICT)2010 (NB: this law covers only crimes committed between 17 2003) Law 31 Conventions Geneva Act 1962 of 1962, as amended Conventions by Geneva (Amendment) Act Law (GCA) Gazette Reference text(s) Military, Penal Law Ireland State Iraq ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 83 universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on I)

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction • PC, Arts 7(5) and 10 General reference: 1

genocide certain crimes related to the conduct of hostilities and misuse of the emblem use of means and methods of warfare prohibited international by law, treaties military honour or acts individuals violence against of prohibited by law or by international treaties

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute LPPG, Art. reference:Specific • • • • CMCW, Arts 174-219 reference:Specific andCMCW, 177 175 Arts 174, crimes: war General reference to 6

No.

272,

, Royal Gazzetta , Gazzetta 1398 of 303 of , Royal

421 of 962 of

, No. No. No.

January approving

No. No.

October 1967 (LPPG) February as 1941, October 1930, as

October 1967 onOctober 1967 December 2001

Law 9 and the Prevention Crime the of Punishment of Genocide 30 Penal Code Decree 19 amended (PC) Military Criminal Code of War Decree 20 amended by Law of 31 Law 1 (CMCW) Ufficiale Reference text(s) State Italy 84 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on 4bis

if the crime is listed in the Penal Code (or in another penal law) and is committed when punishable abroad by virtue of a treaty to which the State is party

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. General reference: • I

8,

5

41

war crimes grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol (when comparable to crimes under ordinary law) destruction of cultural property, unjustified delay in repatriation of prisoners transfer of war, of the State’s own population to occupied territory, impeding the departure of civilians from their territory or from an occupied territory war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) war crimes (unwarranted use of emblems)

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute LGB, Arts 3-6 1, references:Specific • • • MCC, Art. reference:Specific • AJRCS, Art. reference:Specific • , , 45

June

, No. 3 of

No.

, Law 115 of 14 115 58, 2006 (MCC)

, Law No. No.

June 2004 (LGB)

of 1907, as amended of 1907, (PC) concerningLaw the Punishment of Grave International of Breaches Law Humanitarian Law Official Gazette 2004, 18 Law Amended of the Law Jordan Red Crescent Society (AJRCS)2009 Reference text(s) Penal Code Military Criminal Code Criminal Military State Japan Jordan ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 85 2(2)

universal jurisdiction p in Kenya after commission of the offence

Conditions for/restrictions ICA, Sections 5 and 8(1)(c) GCA, Section 10 Authorization Attorney the by General required before the institution of proceedings criminal on 1) resence of the alleged offender CC, Art. rules international Respect for regarding immunity GCA, Section 3(3) Prosecution instituted by or on behalf Attorney the of General I)

4(4)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction • • • • • CC, Art. General reference: • ICA, Section 6 references:Specific GCA, Section 4 reference:Specific GCA, Section 3(1) reference:Specific 8,)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art. war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 genocide crimes against humanity war crimes development,use, manufacture of or trade in chemical, biological, bacteriological or toxic weapons acts protected violence against persons of cities of destruction unjustified destruction heritage cultural or national of all violations of IHL treaties to which the State is party manufacture, stockpiling, use of or trade in weapons of mass destruction

ICA, Section 6 references:Specific CC, Arts and 356 71-79 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • GCA, Section 3(1) reference:Specific • GCA, Section 3(1) reference:Specific • • • • • • • • • • CC, Arts 73 and 74 General references: , , June

, 17 16 of 200816

, revised edition, edition, revised , No.

2, 1993 (CGA)

, 1968, of Laws Criminal Code Criminal Geneva Conventions Act Conventions Geneva Law (ICA) GenevaThe Conventions Act Kenya chap. (GCA) 198 1970, No. 1998, as amended (CC) Reference text(s) Act Crimes International Latvia Kiribati State Kenya 86 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions GCA, Section 1(3) Prosecution instituted by or on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions on grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions

Universal jurisdiction • GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific 770 of the Penal

3

all breaches of the decree are punished in conformity with Art. Code. perfidious use of titles, ranks, military uniforms or emblems perfidious use of the red cross emblem and other similar emblems during an conflictarmed war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute DE, Art. reference:Specific • • • GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific • LMJ, Arts and 144 146 references:Specific , (DE) 14657 on the 14657 April 1968

1301 of 1301

24 on Military24

No. , 13

No.

No. 2 (GCA)

July 1959

, 1957, c. 52 5 and 6 , 1957,

April 1949 April

Decree Use of the Emblem of the Red Cross, Red Crescent and Red and Sun Lion of 1 Law Justice (LMJ) Eliz GenevaThe Conventions Act (Colonial Territories) inOrder Council 1959 Order 28 Reference text(s) The (UnitedThe Kingdom) Conventions Geneva Act State Lebanon Lesotho ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 87 5 and CCP, Arts5 and CCP, 7-4

8(2)

universal jurisdiction s a time-barred

Conditions for/restrictions on CC, Art. if: prosecution No 1) 2) entence served in a third country cquittal, pardon or prosecution AMICC, Art. carried Extradition not but requested out 5 and CCP, Arts5 and CCP, 7-4

7

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes genocide crimes against humanity war crimes

Universal jurisdiction CC, Art. references:Specific • • • AMICC, Art. references:Specific • • • 8,

1 and PC, Arts 136bis to

8)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art.

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CC, Arts 99-113 references:Specific • • • AMICC, Art. 136quater references:Specific • • • 401 41, 41,

, Law , , No. X-1597 of X-1597 , Law of

, Law of VIII-1968

No.

September February 2012,

No.

June as 1879, June 2008 (CC) November 1808,

Bull. 214bis, December 1808, as March p. 2012,

Penal Code Law 26of 2000, as amended by Law 12 16 amended (PC) Code of Criminal Procedure 17 4 on promulgated 9 amended (CCP) Act modifying of the Law 2000 on the Provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Court Criminal of 27 Mémorial Le 7 (AMICC) Reference text(s) Code Criminal Luxembourg State Lithuania 88 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 4(3)

universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions GCA, Section 3(4) Proceedings instituted by or on behalf of the Public Prosecutor CC, Section 5(1)(d) Permanent residence on GCA, Section Proceedings instituted by or on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions 4(1) and (2)

grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions genocide crimes against humanity war crimes

Universal jurisdiction • GCA, Section reference:Specific • CC, Section 5(1)(d) references:Specific • • • GCA, Section 3(1) and (2) reference:Specific 4(1)

8, in respect of international armed 8)

war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art. conflicts) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art.

CC, Section 54 A-D references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute GCA, Section 3(1) reference:Specific • GCA, Section reference:Specific • PC, Arts 29-31 references:Specific • • • • • • VI,

, vol. , as , December February 1962,

5 of 1962, 01-079 of

No. No.

4, 24 4,

August 2001 (PC) , Law 18 of 1967, of, Law 1967, 18 , first published in

19 (GCA)19 August 1967 (GCA)

Geneva Conventions Conventions Geneva Act Penal Code Law Official Gazette No. p. 9 Law 20 amended, 2010 (CC) Reference text(s) Conventions Geneva Act Criminal Code Criminal Malawi Mali State Malaysia Malta ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 89 3(5)

4(3) 6, which refers to FPC

2 and 4: presence of the alleged

universal jurisdiction p n n d Mexico

residence territory the on presence

Conditions for/restrictions on GCA, Art. Director the by authorization Prior of Public Prosecutions to institute proceedings ICC, Art. • • FPC Arts 2 and 4 1) resence of the alleged offender in 2) 3) o final judgment by a foreign court 4) o possibility of extradition ouble criminality FPC Art. Arts offender in Mexico I) I

2 and 6

3(1) and (3)

4(3)

grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol genocide crimes against humanity war crimes crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (even those not covered by the FPC) (1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol

Universal jurisdiction GCA, Art. reference:Specific • ICC, Art. references:Specific • • • FPC, Arts. General reference: • 8,

I)

3(2) 149bis 149

4(1) and Annex 1

war crimes (grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional genocide crimes against humanity war crimes genocide war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) violation humanitarian of norms related to prisoners and hostages the of war, hospitals and wounded

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute GCA, Art. reference:Specific • ICC, Art. references:Specific • • • FPC, Art. reference:Specific • • FPC, Art. General reference: • CMJ, Arts 208-215 reference:Specific ,

, 2

, No. , 1970, , 1970,

27, 2011, 2011, 27,

September May 2003,

, No. , 17 , as amended (last June 2005) (CMJ)

2, pp. 678-682,

July (ICC) 2012 August 1933,

Gaceta del Gobierno del Gaceta vol. amended by Law of 2003, Government Gazette General Notice 722 (GCA) Criminal International Court Act 26 amended 5 2012) (FPC) Code of Military Justice 31 as amended (last in published amendment the Gobierno del Gaceta of 29 Federal Penal CodeFederal (1931) Reference text(s) Act Conventions Geneva of Mauritius Laws Mexico State Mauritius 90 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on I)

14(4)

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction CC, Art. General reference: • 299

genocide war crimes (cruel treatment of prisoners of war or civilians, deportation of the civilian population, pillage of historical and cultural property in occupied territory, misuse of the red cross emblem, despoliation of the dead or wounded) use of means of warfare prohibited by international treaties to which the State is party use of weapons of mass destruction international treaties to by prohibited which the State is party

CC, Arts 293, 296, 299-304 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • CC, Art. General references: • • September

, 1 2002 (CC) Reference text(s) Criminal Code of Mongolia State Mongolia ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 91 138(3) and (5)

universal jurisdiction p c n u d a s a i t the territorythe sentence of 5 years in prison in the country where it was committed CC, penalty no more severe than that prescribed by the law of the country where the crime was committed Prosecutor if the act is punishable under the general principles of law international the by recognized community prosecution committed, proceedings can only be instituted if the victim has lodged a complaint and this complaint has been filed never a detention order on the grounds of mental incompetence

Conditions for/restrictions CC, Arts 137(2) and 138 on 1) resence of the alleged offender on 2) rime punishable by a minimum 3) 4) o possibility of extradition nless otherwise provided in the 5) 6) ouble criminality pproval of the Supreme State CC, Art. if: prosecution No 1) 2) entence served in a third country cquittal, pardon or time-barred 3) n the country where the crime was 4) he alleged perpetrator is subject to 137(2)

penal law applies under certain conditions to foreigners who have committed a crime abroad.

Universal jurisdiction CC, Art. General reference: • 8,

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (acts violating the rules of international law during an armed conflict: Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) use of means and methods of warfare prohibited by international law use and manufacture of weapons international law under prohibited

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CC, Arts 426-441 references:Specific • • • • • CC, Arts 432 and 433 General references: , Official 70/2003,

13/2004 (CC)

, No. No.

corr. Reference text(s) Code Criminal Gazette State Montenegro 92 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 2(6)

universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on GCA, Art. the of authorization Written Prosecutor-General I

2(1) and (3)

grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction GCA, Art. reference:Specific • I)

164 2(1)

war crimes (despoliation and acts of protectedviolence against persons) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes war crimes (grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CMJ, Art. reference:Specific • • • • GCA, Art. reference:Specific • Constitution references:Specific , July

256, ,

1-56-

Bulletin , No. No. 15 of 2003,15

2299bis, 5964 bis,

1-11-91 of 1-11-91

No.

, No. , No. No. November

1319-1338 (CMJ) July 2011), , Act December 2003 November 1956), Shaaban 1376

1956, Dahir 270 of 6 Rabia II 1376 AH (corresponding to 10 1956), Bulletin officiel 13 AH (corresponding to 15 pp. Constitution of 2011 Dahir 27 Shaaban 1432 AH (corresponding to 29 28 Shaaban 1432 AH (corresponding to 30 2011), pp.1902-1938 Official Gazette 18 (GCA) officiel Reference text(s) Code of Military Justice Geneva Conventions Conventions Geneva Act State Morocco Namibia ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 93 2(1)

universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on ICA, Art. Presence of the alleged offender on territorythe ICCA, Section 13 Prior permission of the Attorney institute to General required proceedings GCA, Section 3(5) Prior permission of the Attorney institute to General required proceedings I

2(1)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes genocide crimes against humanity war crimes grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction ICA, Art. references:Specific • • • ICCA, Sections 8(1)(c), and 11 10 9, references:Specific • • • • GCA, Section 3 reference:Specific 8,

8 of the Rome

I)

7(1)

crimes:

war genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) any other violations of the laws and customs war of genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Art. Statute) war crimes (grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional

ICA, Arts 3-7 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • ICA, Art. General reference related to • ICCA, Sections and 11 10 9, references:Specific • • • • GCA, Section 3 reference:Specific , , July

26 26

June 2003

No. No.

144 (10 144 19 (1958)19 , 19

No. 270 No.

October 2000) (GCA) October 2000 (ICCA)

amended by the Geneva the amended by Conventions Amendment International Crimes and Criminal International Act (ICA) Court Act 1 Conventions Geneva Act Act 1987) and by the International Crimes and International Criminal Court Act (1 Reference text(s) Crimes International New ZealandNew State Netherlands 94 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES ) ne bis in idem universal jurisdiction d t s a must have instituted proceedings before the courts of Nicaragua (

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Arts and 16(n) 14 1) 2) ouble criminality he victim or a State representative 1) 2) servedentence already cquittal or pardon in another State No prosecution if: prosecution No I)

16(1)(d) and (n) 208(8)(2)

crimes against international order against crimes any other crime punishable under which to international agreement an the State is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol genocide crimes against humanity war crimes

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. General references: • • PC, Art. references:Specific • • • 8,

I) I, despoliation of the

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol wounded) and dead

PC, Arts 484-521 references:Specific PC, Arts 208(1-3) references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • • • • CMJ, Arts 268-270, 317-321 references:Specific • • • , 6,

Journal Journal 357 No.

La 83 to 87

, May 2008 641, 641, 2008-18 (PC) 2003-010 of

, as amended by 9 , Nos , Special

No. No. No.

March 2003,

May 2003, p.

Gaceta officiel Law of 5 to (PC)respectively Law Code of Military Justice Law 11 5 (CMJ) Reference text(s) Penal Code Penal Code of Niger (2003) State Nicaragua Niger ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 95 5

universal jurisdiction t t t i Norway sentence of more than one year in prison severe than the one prescribed in the country where the crime was committed in the public interest to institute proceedings

Conditions for/restrictions GCA, Section 11 Proceedings instituted by or on behalf Attorney the of General GCA, Section 3(5) The Cabinet must give leave for proceedings to be instituted. on PC, Art. 1) he alleged offender must live in 2) he crime must be punishable by a 3) he sentence cannot be more 4) t must be demonstrated that it is I)

5 6

graves breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions genocide crimes against humanity war crimes crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction • • PC, Art. references:Specific • • • PC, Art. General reference: • GCA, Section 3(1) and (2) reference:Specific GCA, Section 3 reference:Specific 8,

war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 other violations of the 1949 Geneva Conventions (by order of the President) war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts)

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute GCA, Sections 3(1) and 4 references:Specific • • GCA, Section 3 reference:Specific • ArtsPC, Chap.16, 101-110 references:Specific • • • 2,

, IX, 162, CAP. , 2006, vol.

The Laws Laws , The 28 of 2008 (PC)

, Revised Edition, September 1958,

No. 6265-6280 (GCA)

, Act 1958/19 (NZ)

877 (GCA)

Geneva Conventions Conventions Geneva Act Penal Code of 2005 1990, vol. pp. of 18 Niue Laws p. Act Reference text(s) Conventions Geneva Act, 1960 of of the Federation Nigeria Niue Norway State Nigeria 96 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

8(2)

universal jurisdiction s a State time-barred

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. Presence of the alleged offender on territorythe if: prosecution No 1) entence already served in another 2) cquittal, pardon or crime I) I)

19 21 8(1)(6) 8(1)(8)

crimes against humanity crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions genocide crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. reference:Specific • PC, Art. General reference: • • PC, Art. reference:Specific • PC, Art. General reference: • GCA, Arts 2 and 7 reference:Specific 8,

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) violations of IHL treaties to which the State is party (in particular those relating to the protection of women and children, the conduct of hostilities and protected persons property) and war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 genocide war crimes (acts of violence against protected persons, pillage and intentional destruction of civilian property, in particular property of great economic or cultural value)

PC, Arts and 320 319 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute GCA, Arts 7 and 13 reference:Specific PC, Arts 431-446 references:Specific • • • • • • • PC, Arts 439-444 General reference: , July 14 14 ,

Gaceta No.

August

, Act , 25.796,

1.160/97, 1.160/97,

3.440 of 16

, No. May 2007, May 2007,

No.

160, 20160, No.

May 2007 (PC)

oficial of 18 22 Law as amended by Act 2008, Gaceta oficial No. 2008 (PC) Reference text(s) Penal Code (UnitedThe Kingdom) Act Conventions Geneva chap.1975, 84 (GCA) Penal Code State Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 97 4

universal jurisdiction s a n p p i State crime territorythe competent authorities dispense may investigation/prosecution the with

Conditions for/restrictions ACIHL, Section 17 on PC, Art. if: prosecution No 1) entence already served in another 2) cquittal, pardon or time-barred 3) 4) o double criminality olitical offence 1) resence of the alleged offender on 2) n the interest of justice, the I)

78

2(5)

war crimes crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol genocide crimes against humanity war crimes

Universal jurisdiction CMPJ, Art. reference:Specific • PC, Art. General reference: • • • • ACIHL, Section 17 references:Specific 8, 8,

war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) genocide crimes against humanity genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts)

CMPJ, Arts 81-97 reference:Specific ACIHL, Sections 5 and 4, 6 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • • • • PC, Arts 319-321 and 336 references:Specific , , April

9851

, Legislative No.

1094, 635, 8 , Legislative

No. No.

December 2009

September 2010

Decree 1 (CMPJ) Penal Code Decree 1991 (PC) Republic Act 11 (ACIHL) Reference text(s) Code of Military and Police Justice Philippine Act Philippine 2009 on Crimes International against Law, Humanitarian Genocide and Other Humanity against Crimes State Peru Philippines 98 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 5

110

universal jurisdiction p t n d p n the territorythe sentence of a minimum of two years prison in territorythe ICC the surrender to

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. 1) resence of the alleged offender on 2) he crime must be punishable by a 3) 4) o decision on extradition ouble criminality APC, Annex, Art. 1) resence of the alleged offender on 2) o possibility for extradition or I) I)

5

110(2) 113 5(2)

penal law applies under certain conditions to foreigners who have committed a crime abroad. crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party or which are covered by the Rome Statute (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol genocide crimes against humanity war crimes crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. General reference: • PC, Art. General reference: • PC, Art. APC, Annex, Art. references:Specific • • • • General reference: 8, 8,

12(1)

122 122

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) any means or method of warfare IHL under prohibited genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) use of weapons, methods and means of warfare that are of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering inherently are that or indiscriminate

PC, Arts 117-126 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • PC, Art. General reference: • APC, Annex, Arts 8, 9 and 10 references:Specific • • • APC, Annex, Art. General reference: • –

Diário 78, ,

88

of 2010) No. Diário da March

Official 31/2004 of

, I Series 553, as No. July 2004

, Act of No. , I Series – A, 1352 (PC)1352

No.

98, element 626,

, Act

of 2003 and 63, 13

August 1997, August 1997, 171, 22 171, No.

, Law

July 2004,

June 1997, June 1997,

Gazette da República 6 of 2 element amended (Act 708,element Official Gazette Act Official Gazette (PC) 22 No. (APC) Penal Code (1995) A, No. 1995, p. República Reference text(s) Penal Code adaptingLaw Portuguese criminal legislation to the Statute of the International defining Court, Criminal constituting Conduct against Crimes Humanitarian International Law State Poland Portugal ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 99 3(5)

universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on ICCA, Art. Presence of the alleged offender on territorythe I)

3(5)

11 11

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes the PC applies to foreigners who have committed a crime abroad if the crime committed is contrary to the peace and security of humanity or if it is a war crime. crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction ICCA, Art. references:Specific • • • PC, Art. reference:Specific • • General reference: 8, 8,

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) use, during an armed conflict or military action, of methods or means of warfare international treaties under prohibited to which the State is party violations of rules of IHL during an non-internationalinternational or armed conflict that have serious consequences

ICCA, Arts 8-14 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • PC, Arts 373, 389-393 135-144, references:Specific • • • • • PC, Arts143 and 391 General references: , Official 72-74/195, 72-74/195,

, 8719, 8719, 985-XV of , No.

No. No. December 2007

April 2002, April 2009 (PC)

International Criminal Criminal International Court (Crimes and Punishment) Act Act 21 (ICCA) Penal Code Act 18 14 Monitor Reference text(s) Korea Moldova

Republic Republic State Republic of of 100 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 11:

universal jurisdiction r r s State

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. 1) 2) esidence Romania in 3) refused extradition for equest entence not fully served in a third Penal law does not apply to States or of representatives organizations over which Romanian courts do not have jurisdiction with international law. to regard I) I)

12(3) 11

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. General reference: • CC, Art. General reference: • 8,

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) genocide war crimes (cruel treatment of prisoners of war or civilians, deportation of civilian populations, plunder of national property in occupied territories, taking of hostages, destruction of cultural or historical property) development,use, manufacture, stockpiling, acquisition or sale of the other and toxic biological, chemical, types of weapons of mass destruction prohibited by an international treaty to which the State is party

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute PC, Arts 437-445 references:Specific • • • CC, Arts 206, 243, 355, 356(1) and 357 references:Specific • • • CC, Arts 355 and 356(2) General reference: , , 63-FZ of

286/2009 of

No.

No.

June 1996 (CC) July 2009 (PC)

Criminal Code Criminal Act 17 Law 13 Reference text(s) Penal Code Russian Federation State Romania ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 101 90

universal jurisdiction p p i a the territorythe in the same capacity as Rwandan judges State interested other or Prosecutor persons

Conditions for/restrictions on OLJ, Art. 1) resence of the alleged offender on 2) ossibility that foreign judges serve 1) f arrested on the territory of the 2) t the request of the Public CC, Arts and 17 16 No prosecution if the alleged offender has been judged at final instance abroad and, if convicted, has served pardoned. been or sentence the 90

16(12)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes genocide crimes against humanity war crimes

Universal jurisdiction OLJ, Art. references:Specific • • • CC, Art. references:Specific • • • 8,

I)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts)

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute Use of methods and means of warfare prohibited by treaties to which the State is party (1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol Additional 125, 123, 121, 120, CC, 115, Arts 114, and 132 126 references:Specific • • • , , 07/2004

No.

July 2004,

, Journal officiel April 2004April on the

14, 15 14, 01/2012/OL of

75 (OLJ) May (CC) 2012

Organic Law of 25 Judiciary No. p. on Organic Law Code Criminal the No. 2 Reference text(s) State Russian Federation (continued) Rwanda 102 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions GCA, Section 1(3) Prosecution instituted by or on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions GCA, Section 1(3) Prosecution instituted by or on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions on grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions

Universal jurisdiction • • GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific • GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific • 2 ,

, , , rev. ed. , rev. 1301 of 1301 of 1301

No. No. 2, as amended by

July 1959 July 1959 , 1957 c., 1957 52 5 and

The (UnitedThe Kingdom) Conventions Geneva Act 1957 c.1957 52 5 and 6 Eliz (GCA) GenevaThe Conventions Act (Colonial Territories) inOrder Council 1959 Order 28 6 Eliz the law supplementing the (United Kingdom) law of as 1957 applicable to Saint Vincent and under Grenadines the the (United Kingdom) Order of 1959 (Colonial Territories), of Laws Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1990, chap. (GCA) 138 GenevaThe Conventions Act (Colonial Territories) inOrder Council 1959 Order 28 Reference text(s) (UnitedThe Kingdom) Act Conventions Geneva Saint Vincent and the Grenadines State Lucia Saint ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 103 universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions ICCA, Section 16 Attorney consent required General’s on genocide crimes against humanity war crimes

Universal jurisdiction • • • ICCA, Section 13 references:Specific crimes:

8)

war genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art. any act committed during an armed conflict which, at the time of its commission, was a war crime under international customary law or international treaty law applying to conflictsarmed

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute ICCA, Sections 5, 6 and 7 references:Specific • • • ICCA, Section 7 applying reference General to • , 26

No.

November 2007 (ICCA)

Court Act 9 Reference text(s) Criminal International State Samoa 104 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 669

universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on Art.CCP, Presence of the alleged offender on the territory, including by extradition, or victim residing on the territory 669

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes

Universal jurisdiction CCP, Art.CCP, references:Specific • • • 8)

431(1-5) 431(6)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. acts deemed to constitute a criminal offence of principles general the under law recognized by all nations, whether transgression a constituted they not or of the law in force at the time and place question in

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute PC, Art. references:Specific • • • PC, Art. General reference: • , ,

2377 2384

, 2007-02 2007-05

, amended 65-60 of

No. No.

February 2007 February

No. July 1965, amended

March p. 2007, March p. 2007,

Act 21 by Act of 12 modifying Penal the Code, Journal officiel 10 (PC) Code of Criminal Procedure by Act of 12 2007 the amending Code of Criminal Procedure relative to the implementation of the Rome Statute establishing the International Criminal Court, Journal officiel 10 (CCP) Reference text(s) Penal Code State Senegal ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 105 universal jurisdiction p d n c u f a i t the territorythe by the Public Prosecutor) sentence of at least 5 years in the State where it was committed CC, punishment no more severe than that prescribed in the country where the crime was committed crime proceedings can be instituted only if the victim filed a complaint and such complaint has not been filed a detention order on the grounds of mental incompetence

Conditions for/restrictions CC, Arts 9(2) and 10 on 1) resence of the alleged offender on 2) ouble criminality (unless authorized 3) 4) o possibility of extradition rime punishable by a prison 5) nless otherwise provided in the 1) 2) ull sentence served in a third country cquittal, pardon or time-barred 3) n the country where the crime 4) he alleged perpetrator is subject to Authorization of the Public Prosecutor Prosecutor Public the of Authorization if the act is considered a crime under the general principles of law international the by recognized community if: prosecution No 9(2)

criminal law applies under certain conditions to foreigners who have committed a crime abroad.

Universal jurisdiction CC, Art. General reference: • 8,

376

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) order to use methods and means of warfare banned by international law selling, buying, manufacturing, export of weapons the production of which is forbidden international law by

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CC, Arts 370-385 references:Specific • • • CC, Art. General references: • • , Official , Nos 85/2005, Reference text(s) Code Criminal Gazette 88/2005, 107/2005 (CC) State Serbia 106 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions LCG, Section 3(3) Proceedings must be instituted by the Attorney General GCA, Section 1(3) Proceedings must be instituted by the Attorney General on 1

grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions

Universal jurisdiction • GCA, Section reference:Specific • GCA, Section 3(1) and (2) reference:Specific 1

war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949

GCA, Section 3(1) reference:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • GCA, Section reference:Specific • 2 , ,

, January 1986, 1301 of 1301

20 of 1985,

, 6 No.

No.

July 1959

119–127, revised in 119–127,

The (UnitedThe Kingdom) Act Conventions Geneva Law Supplement to the Official Gazette p. 1991 (GCA) c.1957 52 5 and 6 Eliz (GCA) GenevaThe Conventions Act (Colonial Territories) inOrder Council 1959 Order 28 Reference text(s) Act Conventions Geneva Sierra Leone State Seychelles ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 107 universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on I)

genocide war crimes crime against humanity crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction • • • • CC, Section 5(a) references:Specific CC, Section 7 General reference: 8 of the 8,

crimes:

war genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) possession in any form of weapons prohibited by law or by international treaty any other crime covered by Art. Rome Statute use of prohibited means and methods warfareof

CC, Sections 417-435 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • • • to • CC, Sections 417(a) and 433 General references: CC, Section 426 General reference related , 300/2005, as

No.

Act amended (CC) Reference text(s) Code Criminal State Slovakia 108 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES universal jurisdiction arrest n d s a t a i Minister of Justice’s permission Justice’s is Minister of required) prescribed in the country where the crime was committed Justice if proceedings have been instituted or interrupted in a third country crime in a third country proceedings can be instituted only if the victim filed a complaint and such complaint has not been filed

Conditions for/restrictions on CC, Arts 13(2) and 14 1) 2) 3) o possibility of extradition ouble criminality (failing which, the 4) entence no more severe than that 5) uthorization of the Minister of 1) 2) he sentence has been served cquittal, pardon or time-barred 3) n the country where the crime No prosecution if: prosecution No Authorization of the Minister of Justice if the offence is considered a crime under the general principles of law recognized by the international community I)

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction • CC, Art.11 CC, Art.11 General reference: 8,

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts)

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CC, Arts and 102 100, 101 references:Specific • • • (as 2008) (CC)

of Reference text(s) Code Criminal amended by Law KZ-1 State Slovenia ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 109 universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions GCA, Section 1(3) Prosecution instituted by or on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions on IRS, Section 4(3) Ordinary presence of the alleged offender territory the on GCA, Section 7(2) The Court is designated by the Cabinet, the Chief Justice and the National Director of Public Prosecutions. I

grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions genocide crimes against humanity war crimes grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction • IRS, Section 4 and Part Annex 1, 3 references:Specific • • • • GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific GCA, Sections 5(1) and (4) and 7(1) reference:Specific I

8)

war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art. grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol

IRS, Part Annex 1, 3 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific • • • • GCA, Section 5(1)-(3) reference:Specific • , , , July

445,

984,

Official 536, 12

1301 of 1301

, No. , c. 52 5 and 6 , No. No.

23642, vol. 8, 2012, 2 (GCA)

July 1959

July 2002 (IRS)

Implementation of the the of Implementation Rome of Statute the Criminal International Court Act Gazette Eliz GenevaThe Conventions Act (Colonial Territories) inOrder Council 1959 Order 28 2002, Official Gazette No. 18 the of Implementation Act Conventions Geneva No. 2012 (GCA) Reference text(s) (UnitedThe Kingdom) Conventions Geneva Act 1957 South Africa State Solomon Islands 110 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 23(5)

universal jurisdiction n t another State full in another State

Conditions for/restrictions GCA, Section 1(3) Proceedings must be instituted by the Director of Public Prosecutions on PC, Art. 1) o acquittal, pardon or conviction in 2) he sentence has not been served in I)

1

23(4)(a) 23(4)(h)

genocide crimes against humanity crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (in particular IHL and human rights treaties) (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions

Universal jurisdiction OLJ, Art. references:Specific • • OLJ, Art. General reference: • GCA, Section reference:Specific • 8, 8,

1

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949

AFA, 153-161 Sections 151, reference:Specific PC, Arts 607-614 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • • • • GCA, Section reference:Specific • , , , as , 2007 10/1995 6/1985

No. No.

July 1985

1301 of 1301

, c. 52 5 and 6 Boletín oficial , Boletín 15/2003 of

No. November 1995

No. July on 1985 the

157, 2 157, 2 (GCA)

July 1959 November 2003 (PC)

Armed Forces Act Forces Armed (AFA) Organic Law of 23 on the Penal Code amended by Organic Law 25 Organic Law of 1 Judiciary No. (OLJ) Eliz GenevaThe Conventions Act (Colonial Territories) inOrder Council 1959 Order 28 Reference text(s) The (UnitedThe Kingdom) Conventions Geneva Act 1957 Sudan State Spain Swaziland ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 111 universal jurisdiction go a d s t a c t t to institute proceedings (unless the crime was committed in Denmark, Finland, Iceland or Norway, or by a citizen of one of these countries) was committed in the performance of official duties for a country or international organization prescribed at the place where the crime was committed domiciled in Sweden or still be present on the territory; in the latter case, the crime must be punishable where it was committed by a sentence of at least six months country (even sentencing) without post-judgement

Conditions for/restrictions on SPC, Section 2, Arts 2, 5 and 7(a): 1) required authorization vernment 2) uthorization required if the crime 3) 4) ouble criminality entence no more severe than that 5) he alleged offender must be 1) 2) cquittal in a third country onviction at final instance in a third 3) 4) he sentence has been served he sentence is time-barred No prosecution if: prosecution No 3(6) and (7)

1

years under criminal law

genocide international law against crime if the crime committed is punished by a prison sentence of a minimum of 4

Universal jurisdiction GA, Art. reference:Specific • SPC, Section 2, Art. references:Specific • • 1

genocide war crimes (use, development, manufacturing, purchase, storage of weapons prohibited misuse by law, of protective and emblems acts signs, of protectedviolence against persons or attack)goods, indiscriminate including

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute GA, Art. reference:Specific • • SPC, Section 22 (Arts 1-11) reference:Specific , , March 1964, SFS

20 1964:169 (GA) Reference text(s) SwedishThe Penal Code SFS 1962:700, Ds (SPC) 1999:36 to theAct relating genocidepunishment of State Sweden 112 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 10

264(m) and MPC, Art. 6

universal jurisdiction p n a f t d p n p a t the territorythe international tribunal court) international criminal an is prosecuting the offence and the alleged offender has been extradited or handed over; Switzerland and will probably not return there. territorythe that prescribed by the law of the country in which the crime was committed abroad was suspended or is time-barred stopped if:

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. 1) resence of the alleged offender on 2) o extradition or surrender to an or 3) oreign authority (including 4) he alleged offender is no longer in PC, Art. 1) 2) ouble criminality resence of the alleged offender on 3) 4) o possibility of extradition unishment no more severe than 1) 2) cquittal in the foreign country he execution of the sentence The proceedings are suspended if: prosecution No I)

10

264(m) 6 7

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol criminal law applies under certain conditions to anybody who has committed a crime abroad.

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. CPM, Art. references:Specific • • • PC, Art. General reference: • PC, Art. General reference: • 8, 8,

114

264(j)

crimes: crimes:

war war genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other serious violations of IHL, including non-international to related those conflicts)armed violation of a norm of IHL punishable under treaty or customary law genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) violation of a norm of IHL punishable under treaty or customary law

PC, Arts 264-264(j)PC, references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • PC, Art. General reference applicable to • • • • MPC, Art. applying reference General to • MPC, Arts 108-114 references:Specific , Recueil , 43 375 , 54 781 , 311.0, , 311.0, , 321.0, , 321.0, , Recueil June 1927, June 1927,

13 systématique Recueil officiel (MPC) Reference text(s) Penal Code Systématique Recueil officiel (PC) Military Penal Code State Switzerland ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 113 7:

universal jurisdiction d t e s a t commission of the act not falling under any jurisdiction the territory or has been handed over to the Swiss authorities grounds other than the nature of the act or particularly serious crime proscribed international the by community prescribed in the country where the crime was committed time-barred abroad

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. 1) ouble criminality or place of 2) he alleged offender is present on 3) xtradition reqeust rejected on 4) entence no more severe than that 1) 2) cquittal in the foreign country he sentence was reduced or is No prosecution if: prosecution No Universal jurisdiction Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute Reference text(s) State Switzerland (continued) 114 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 15(2)

universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on CC, Art. No conviction in another State I)

15(2)

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction CC, Art. General reference: •

8,

I, Rome Statute)

405

genocide war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) use of means, materials and weapons of mass destruction prohibited by the instruments to which the State is party Geneva Conventions,(1949 Additional Protocol war crimes (cruel treatment of the wounded and sick, despoliation of the wounded and sick, looting, unjustified the property, of appropriation of misuse red cross emblem) war crimes (grave breaches of the Third Geneva Convention, serious violations of Article 3 common to the 1949 Geneva Conventions

CPM, Sections 48 and 49 reference:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CC, Arts 403 and 404 references:Specific • • CC, Art. General reference: • • • LTPW, Arts 12-16, 18-19 LTPW, Arts 12-16, reference:Specific , B.E. , October

, , 1949 May 1998 (CC)

August 12

Military Penal Code revisedB.E.2454, 1911, in 1930 and 1964 (MPC) for the enforcement Law of the Geneva Convention to the treatment relative of warof prisoners 21 of 2498 (1955), 6 1955 (LTPW) Reference text(s) Code Criminal Thailand State Tajikistan ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 115 universal jurisdiction p c u d a t a i t on the territory (including by extradition) sentence of a minimum of 5 years in the State where it was committed no punishment more severe than that prescribed by the law of the country in which the crime was committed (approval is also required if the crime is punishable under the general principles of law recognized international the community)by sentence prosecution proceedings can be instituted only if the victim filed a complaint and such complaint has not been filed abroad order detention

Conditions for/restrictions PC, Arts 119(2) and 120 on 1) resence of the alleged offender 2) rime punishable by a prison 3) nless otherwise stated in the PC, 4) 5) ouble criminality pproval from the Public Prosecutor 1) he offender has served the 2) cquittal, pardon or time-barred 3) n the country where the crime 4) he alleged offender is subject to a No prosecution if: prosecution No 119(2)

criminal law applies under certain conditions to foreigners who have committed a crime abroad.

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. General reference: • 8,

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts)

PC, Arts 403-422 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • July

, 23 1996, amended (PC) Reference text(s) Penal Code State The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 116 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 8

the territorythe surrender

universal jurisdiction p n on or

CC, Art. Conditions for/restrictions on 1) resence of the alleged offender 2) o possibility of extradition ICCA, Section 13 Attorney to consent required General’s institute proceedings penal (the alleged offender can nevertheless be arrested consent) such pending GCA, Section 4 Attorney to consent required General’s institute proceedings penal (the alleged offender can nevertheless be arrested consent) such pending 2(1) and (2)

I)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes genocide crimes against humanity war crimes genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional

Universal jurisdiction CC, Art.8 references:Specific • • • Regulation 2000/15, Art. references:Specific • • • ICCA, Sections 8(1)(c), 9 and 11 references:Specific • • • GCA, Section 3 reference:Specific 8,

I)

8) 8)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art. genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art. war crimes (grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional

CC, Arts 123-130 references:Specific ICCA, Section and 11 10 9, references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • • • • • • • GCA, Section 3 reference:Specific • Regulation 2000/15, Arts 5 and 4, 6 references:Specific , 4

June

No. , Decree-

April 2009, 25 of 14 (CC)14

32, legal

, 8 , Act No. , UNTAET/ ,

June 2000 on the 45, No.

, Act December 2008

April approving the

8 Criminal Code, Jornal da República series I, No. Regulation No 2000/15 of 6 panels of establishment with exclusive jurisdiction criminal serious over offences REG/2000/15, 6 2000 (Regulation 2000/15) of 2006, Trinidad and Gazette Tobago vol. supplement, Part A (ICCA) Conventions Geneva Act 15 (GCA) Reference text(s) Code Criminal Law No.19/2009 of Criminal International Court Act State Timor-Leste Trinidad and Tobago ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 117 universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions ICCA, Section 18(d) Presence of the alleged offender on territorythe GCA, Section 1(3) Proceedings instituted by or on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions on I)

8

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 in cases provided for by the international which treaties to the State is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction • • • • CC, Art. General reference: • ICCA, Section 18 references:Specific GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific I)

8)

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art. war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 genocide production, purchase, development, transportation or distribution of storage, weapons of mass destruction use of methods of warfare prohibited by the treaties to which the State is party any other violation of IHL under the treaties to which the State is party (1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional

ICCA, Sections 7-16 references:Specific CC, Arts 438, 440-442, 444 and 445 references:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific • • • • • CC, Arts 438 and 439 General references: CIII,

, Official , Official , 39, vol. 25-26,

2341-14, 2341-14,

31 of 1964 , No. , No.

No.

No. June (ICCA) 2010

April 2001,

Criminal Code Criminal Gazette 25 Geneva1964 Act Conventions Act (GCA) Law 15 2001 (CC) Reference text(s) Criminal International Court Act (2010) Gazette Ukraine State Uganda 118 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on GCA, Section 1(3) Prosecution instituted by or on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions I

grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific • I

13

25

8)

unauthorized use of the emblem that results in loss of human lives or grave injuries. The law presumably applies at all times, although there is no specific mention of war crimes. genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (under Rome Statute, Art. grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute LRCO, Art. reference:Specific • ICCA, Section 50 and ICCAS, Art. references:Specific • • • GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific • , , Ch. 17 , Ch. 17 , 2001, Ch. 17 , 2001, Ch. 17 , Scotland, 9 of 2002

2, as amended by

No.

, 1957 c., 1957 52 5 and Law concerning the Red inCrescent Organization the United Emirates Arab (LRCO) 6 Eliz the Conventions Geneva (Amendment) Act 1995 c. 27 and by the Criminal International Court Act, 2001 (GCA) Reference text(s) International Criminal Criminal International Court Act (ICCA) Criminal International Court Act 2001, Ch. asp. 13 (ICCAS) Conventions Geneva Act State United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 119 universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions GCA, Section 1(3) Prosecution instituted by or on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions on war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 genocide

Universal jurisdiction • SectionsCCP, 1091 and 2441 reference:Specific • GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific May 1996)

October torture, 1907; cruel

war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949 genocide war crimes (grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions; violations of Arts 23, 25, 27 and 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV related to laws and customs of war on land, signed on 18 or inhumane treatment, conducting medical experiments, murder, mutilation, injury, rape and sexual violence, taking hostages; intentionally causing death or grave injury to civilians in violation of the Protocol on Prohibitions and Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices, as amended on 3

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute GCA, Section 1 reference:Specific • SectionsCCP, 1091 and 2441 references:Specific • • , , ; IV, I, Chapter

, US Code, 1301 of 1301 , US Code,

, c. 52 5 and 6 85

, US Code, No.

10, Subtitle A, Subtitle 10, 18, Part18, II, Chapter 47

2 (GCA) June 1926, as July 1959

Code of the of Laws United States of America Eliz GenevaThe Conventions Act (Colonial Territories) inOrder Council 1959 Order 28 30 amended Uniform Code of Military Justice Title Part Criminal and Crimes Procedure Title (CCP)50A and 118 CourtsDistrict Jurisdiction Title 28, Part Chapter Reference text(s) (UnitedThe Kingdom) Conventions Geneva Act 1957 United States America of State United Republic of Tanzania 120 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES 4(2)

universal jurisdiction p n on the territory of the State or on jurisdiction its territory under extradition for or

Conditions for/restrictions GCA, Section 6 Proceedings must be instituted by the Prosecutor Public on ACICC, Art. 1) resence of the alleged offender 2) o request for surrender by the ICC 4(2)

genocide war crimes crimes against humanity grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions

Universal jurisdiction ACICC, Art. references:Specific • • • • GCA, Sections 4 and 5 reference:Specific

8,

26 2

III, Art.

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (Rome Statute, Art. considered in conjunction with other grave violations of IHL, including those armed non-international in committed conflicts) behaviour constituting crimes under international law war crimes (grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions)1949

GCA, Section 4 reference:Specific ACICC, Part Title Arts Two, 1, and 16 Title II, particularly17, Arts and 19, 18 Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute Title references:Specific • • • ACICC, Art. General reference: • •

, October

, 4 22 of 1982,

war and crimes , No. , revised edition, edition, revised ,

, Act Laws of the RepublicLaws of Vanuatu chap. (GCA) 150 Penal Code (PP) Conventions Geneva Act 2006 (ACICC) Reference text(s) on Act 18.026 cooperation the with Criminal International Court in the fight against genocide humanity against crimes official Diario Vanuatu State Uruguay ANNEX 4: TABLE ON THE INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION 121 4(9)

universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on PC, Art. Presence of the alleged offender on territorythe 4(9)

crimes against humanity under international law

Universal jurisdiction PC, Art. reference:Specific • 474

155 155

acts of violence against protected persons and property, use of weapons unnecessarycausing suffering, undefended towns of bombing violation of the principles of civilized nations applicable in time of war (particularly non- prisoners, for respect combatants, distinctive other and signs similar cases)

Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute CMJ, Art. reference:Specific • PC, Art. General reference: • , , as 5.908,

No. , special

5.263,

, as amended, No.

April 2005 (PC) September 1998, 36 (CMJ)

special issue 13 Code of Military Justice Gaceta oficial Issue 17 p. Reference text(s) Penal Code of 1964 Gacetaamended, oficial State Venezuela (Bolivarian of)Republic 122 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES universal jurisdiction

Conditions for/restrictions on Section 3(6) the under instituted Proceedings authority Attorney the of General I

6

crimes the State is obliged to repress international the treatiesunder to which it is party grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol

Universal jurisdiction Art. General reference: • Section 3(1) and (3) reference:Specific • I)

I)

crimes: 343 343

genocide crimes against humanity war crimes (acts of violence against protected persons, looting, destruction residentialof areas) other acts constituting a serious violation of international treaties or laws to which the State is party (1949 Geneva Conventions Additional and Protocol use of prohibited methods and means warfareof war crimes (grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Protocol Additional

Arts 341-344 Arts references:Specific 3(1)Section reference:Specific Crimes referred to in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Rome Statute • • • Art. General reference: • Art. concerning reference General war • • 22 of

, No.

36 (1981), as 15/1999/QH10,

, Nos 36, 1981,

No.

, No. (1996), Official 191 and 191

Gazette pp. 303 and 22, 1997, Act 1999 amended by the Geneva Amendment Conventions Act p. 2001 Reference text(s) Code Criminal Geneva Conventions Conventions Geneva Act State Viet Nam Zimbabwe Zimbabwe 5. TABLE OF NATIONAL CASE LAW ON INTERNATIONAL CRIMES AND UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION *

* This table is not intended to be exhaustive. It covers only criminal cases concerning war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, and only those that have reached at least the indictment stage, since the information is public. Any additional Information on pending cases may be sent to the ICRC Advisory Service. 124 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES December 2009

Date of the decision 14 August14 1991 (acquittal) 18 (decision regarding the issue of an international arrest warrant Jiang and against Luo) July 199413 (acquittal) 8 June 2001 (conviction) 6 November 1998 (decision admissibility) on 8 June 2001 (conviction) (1)

ter 7 and 8 7 7

66 and 67 144 65(1.2),

7

Laws cited Laws War Crimes Act 1945, as amended in 1988, Sections 5, 6(1) and (3), 9 and 11 7, Law relative to the repression of serious violations of international humanitarian law, Law relative to the repression of serious violations of international humanitarian law, Law relative to the repression of serious violations of international humanitarian law, Penal Code,Penal Art. Penal Code, Art. in conjunction with the Genocide, on Convention Art. June 1993,16 Art. June 1993,16 Arts June 1993,16 Art. Penal Code, Arts Genocide and torture War crimes Genocide War crimes Crimes against humanity Genocide

Types of crime • • • • • • committed

Place where the crime Bosnia-Herzegovina Ukraine (Nazi Germany) was China Rwanda Rwanda Chile ) 9

, Assize absentia

in , Reference Jiang al., et Zemin Cvjetkovic, Supreme Court Polyukhovich, High Court Ntezimana al. et (Butare Four), Assize Aguilar v. Diaz al. et Pinochet Court of First Instance, Brussels ( Higaniro al. et (Butare Four) Federal Court No. Court, Brussels Court, Brussels Austria Trial location Trial Argentina Australia Belgium ANNEX 5 : TABLE OF NATIONAL CASE LAW 125 Date of the decision 18 April18 2011 (arrest, and indictment detention Brussels) in 29 June 2005 (conviction) 5 July 2007 (conviction) 7 and 8

66 and 67 66 and 67

6(1bis) and 10(1bis) 6(1bis) 29(3.5) 29(3.2 and 3.5)

Laws cited Laws Law relative to the repression of serious violations of international humanitarian law, Law containing the Introductory Title of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Law containing the Introductory Title of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 16 June 1993,16 Arts Art. Act of 5 August 2003 relating to grave breaches of international humanitarian law, Art. Penal Code, Arts Arts Act of 5 August 2003 relating to grave breaches of international humanitarian law, Art. Penal Code, Arts Genocide Crimes against humanity Genocide War crimes War crimes Crimes against humanity Genocide

Types of crime • • • • • • • committed

Place where the crime Rwanda was Rwanda Rwanda

, , Reference Matthias BushsihiMatthias (Butare Four), Court of Brussels Instance, First Nzabonimana and and Nzabonimana Ndashyikirwa Ntuyahaga Assize Court, Brussels Assize Court, Brussels Trial location Trial Belgium (continued) 126 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES May 2009 May 2012 March 1994

Date of the decision 25 November 1994 (conviction) June 2010 11 (conviction) 24 (conviction) 22 (conviction) 28 (opening trial) the of 26 April 2012 (conviction) January13 2009 (indictment) 6

7(3.71)

8(5), 245 607bis

IV 1(a), Penal and

7(1), in conjunction

132 of 29132 April 1955

6(3), (4) and (5) 4(1), in conjunction with

Laws cited Laws Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, 2000, Crimes Against Humanity and Criminal Code, Chap. 13, Criminal Code, Art. Art. War Crimes Act, 2000, Art. Penal Code, Arts and 246 Law No. of concerning punishment the Art.genocide, Code, Art. with the Convention on Genocide, Art. Code,Penal Art. Art. Genocide on Convention the War crimes Crimes against humanity Genocide War crimes Crimes against humanity Genocide Crimes against humanity War crimes Genocide Crimes against humanity Genocide

Types of crime • • • • • • • • • • • committed

Place where the crime Hungary Rwanda Rwanda Rwanda Bosnia-Herzegovina El Salvador Rwanda was , , , , , ., Reference Finta Supreme Court T Supreme Court Désiré Munyaneza, Court, Superior Quebec Chamber, Criminal Montreal Jacques Mungwarere Superior Court, Ontario Saric High Court Eastern Division (Third Chamber) Carlos Camilo Barahona Hernández National Court Francois Bazaramba District Court of Itä-Uusimaa Trial location Trial Canada Denmark Finland ANNEX 5 : TABLE OF NATIONAL CASE LAW 127 by Italy on March 1990 March 2003)

absentia

Date of the decision The prosecution files on Munyeshyaka and Bucyibaruta were sent by Internationalthe Criminal forTribunal Rwanda in November 2007. December 2011 (indictment) 16 (convicted – also convicted in 14 1 July 2005 (conviction) 26 January 2010 (declaration admissibility) of September24 2010 (conviction) May May

222(1) 221(1), and

96-432 of 22 96-432 of 22

689, 689(1) and 689(2) 689(1), which was added 689(2), which was added 689 ff

December 1985 December 1985

Laws cited Laws Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure, Art. to the Code by the Law of 30 Law No. 1996, whereby French courts may exercise universal jurisdiction in relation to international crimes committed Rwanda genocide the in during Art. to the Code by the Law of 30 Criminal Code, Art. Art. Criminal Code, Art. Code of Criminal Procedure, Arts Law No. 1996, whereby French courts may exercise universal jurisdiction in relation to international crimes committed Rwanda genocide the in during Torture Torture Genocide Crimes against humanity Acts of torture and barbarity Torture, kidnapping and disappearance Torture Genocide Crimes against humanity

Types of crime • • • • • • • • committed

Place where the crime Cambodia Tunisia Rwanda Rwanda was Argentina Mauritania

, , , , ) ) , absentia absentia

in in Reference Alfredo IgnacioAlfredo Astiz Assize Court, Paris ( Ely Ould Dah Ely Assize Court, Nîmes ( X v. the FIDH,X v. the LDH and Ung Bun Hor, Court of Appeal, Examination Chamber, Paris Ben SaïdGharbi v. al. et Assize Court, Meurthe-et-Moselle Sosthène Munyemana specialized judicial unit, Paris Dupaquier v. al. et Munyeshyaka and Bucyibaruta Court of Appeal, Paris Trial location Trial France 128 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES May 1997 December 2000 December 1998

Date of the decision 21 February 2001 (conviction) 23 (conviction) 11 (decision incompetence) of 12 (conviction) 21 February 2001 (conviction) May 2011 (opening trial) the of May 2011 (opening trial) the of January18 2011 (opening trial) the of 6

6

146 146

), Art. ), ), 6(9) and 6(1) and (9) 6(9), in 6(9) 6(1),

7 and 8-12 7 and 8-12

Völkerstrafgesetzbuch Völkerstrafgesetzbuch Völkerstrafgesetzbuch Laws cited Laws Code of Crimes against International Law ( Code of Crimes against International Law ( Code of Crimes against International Law ( Penal Code, Arts 7(2) Penal Code, Art. Code,Penal Art. in conjunction with the Convention on Genocide, Art. Penal Code, Art. conjunction with the Fourth Geneva Convention, Arts and 147 Penal Code, Art. Arts Arts Genocide War crimes Ill-treatment Genocide Genocide Genocide War crimes (certain violations of the 1949 Geneva Conventions) War crimes Crimes against humanity War crimes Crimes against humanity Genocide, incitation to murder

Types of crime • • • • • • • • • • • • committed

Place where the crime Bosnia-Herzegovina Bosnia-Herzegovina Bosnia-Herzegovina Bosnia-Herzegovina Bosnia-Herzegovina Rwanda Rwanda Rwanda was , , , , , , , , Reference Djajic RegionalHigher Court, Munich Sokolovic Federal Court of Justice X v. SB andX v. DB Federal Supreme Court Jorgic Federal Constitutional Court Kusljic Federal Court of Justice Ignace Murwanashyaka RegionalHigher Court, Stuttgart MusoniStraton RegionalHigher Court, Stuttgart Onesphore Rwabukombe RegionalHigher Court, Frankfurt Trial location Trial Germany ANNEX 5 : TABLE OF NATIONAL CASE LAW 129 May 1962 March 2009 March March 2003

December 2000

Date of the decision 11 November11 1997 (conviction) 29 (conviction) 6 (conviction) 14 (conviction, upheld verdict in April 2008 and February 2009) 7 April 2004 (conviction) 25 June 2007 (conviction) 8 July 2008 (conviction) 23 (conviction) 1, 1,

7, 8, 11, 81, 81, 8, 11, 7, 575 110, 81,

47 47

8, and Act implementing 3 3 5 1(a)(1), 1(a)(2) and 1(a)(3) and 1(a)(2) 1(a)(1),

Laws cited Laws Nazis and Nazi Collaborators Punishment Law, 1950, International Crimes Act, Criminal Law in Wartime Act, Criminal Law in Wartime Act, Act implementing the Convention Torture, against Art. Penal Code, Arts 575 and 577 Penal Code, Arts and 577 Wartime Offences Act, Arts 3, 8 and 9 Art. Conventionthe against Torture, Section 1(1), in conjunction with the Criminal Code, Art. Art. Art. Art. Genocide Crimes against humanity War crimes Crimes against humanity Torture War crimes Torture Torture as a war crime War crimes Crimes against humanity Torture

Types of crime • • • • • • • • • • • committed

Place where the crime Germany Democratic Republic of the Congo Bosnia-Herzegovina Afghanistan was Afghanistan Rwanda Argentina Argentina , , , , , ) ) , , , Hague Hague

absentia absentia

in in Reference Eichmann District Court, Jerusalem Nzapali District Court, Rotterdam Assize Court, Rome ( Carlos Guillermo Guillermo Carlos Mason Suárez IgnacioAlfredo Astiz Knesevic Supreme Court Abdullah Faquirzada District Court, Hesam and Jalalzoy Supreme Court Mpambara J. District Court, Assize Court, Rome ( The The Trial location Trial Israel Italy Netherlands 130 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES Date of the decision 14 April14 2011 (conviction) July 200717 (decision on the Court’s jurisdiction, case subsequently tried by a court in Argentina, conviction on 26 October 2011) 14 October14 2005 (conviction, upheld by the Court of Appeal on 29 January 2007 and by the Supreme Court on 9 July 2008) October14 2005 (conviction, upheld by the Court of Appeal on 29 January 2007 and by the Supreme Court on 9 July 2008) 25 September 2012 (opening trial) the of 26 September 2005 (decision admissibility) on (international arrest warrant issued on 7 July 2006) January10 2006 (conviction) 223(1)

23(4)(a), 23(4) 23(4)

6/1985 on 6/1985 on 6/1985 on

4 and 5 4 and 5 101 101

Laws cited Laws International Crimes Act, International Crimes Act, Code,Penal 16, Chap. Arts Arts 1905 Penal Code, Art. and (2) Art. Organic Law No. the Judiciary, Art. Organic Law No. the Judiciary, Art. Organic Law No. the Judiciary, Arts (b) and (h) and 65 Crimes against humanity War crimes Crimes against humanity War crimes Deprival of liberty in wartime Genocide Genocide Genocide and torture Crimes against humanity

Types of crime • • • • • • • • • committed

Place where the crime Rwanda Bosnia-Herzegovina China Argentina was Afghanistan Afghanistan Guatemala ,

, , , , ) Hague Hague

absentia

in Reference Habibullah Jalalzoy District Court, Sadi Bugingo District Court, Oslo Heshamuddin Hesam District Court, Repak Mirsad Supreme Court al. Menchú et Tum Ríos Monttv. al., et Constitutional Court ( Fundación Casa del Tibet al., et Zemin v. al. et National Court, Criminal Chamber SpainCavallo v. National Court The The Trial location Trial Netherlands (continued) Norway Spain ANNEX 5 : TABLE OF NATIONAL CASE LAW 131 Date of the decision 24 January 2013 (hearing) January 24 2013 February10 2000 (conviction) July 200518 (conviction) 3 July 2007 (conviction) 30 April 1999 (conviction) 13 January13 2009 (indictment) 8 April 2011 (conviction) 20 January (conviction) 2012 April18 1997 (conviction) 3(6)

2(9),

1 and

1,

139(1) and 607bis

2

108(2) and 109 6(2), Chap. 3, Arts

Laws cited Laws Penal Code,Penal 22, Chap. Military Penal Code, Criminal Justice Act, 1988, Section 134 War Crimes Act, 1991, Section 1 Criminal Justice Act, 1988, Section 134 Penal Code, Arts 163 Code,Penal Art. Penal Code, Chap. 2, Art. Art. Chap. 23, Art.11, Art.Chap. 13, Arts Military Penal Code, Arts 108(2) and 109 Crimes against humanity Crimes against humanity War crimes Crimes against humanity Murder attempted and murder Arson War crimes War crimes Torture War crimes Torture

Types of crime • • • • • • • • • • • committed

Place where the crime Argentina Belarus Afghanistan El Salvador Nepal Kosovo Bosnia-Herzegovina Bosnia-Herzegovina Rwanda was

, , , , , , (Goran case), Grabež Reference Scilingo Manzorro National Court Sawoniuk Court of Appeal, Chamber Criminal Zardad, Central Criminal Court, London Carlos Camilo Barahona Hernández National Court Lama Kumar Central Criminal Court, London District Court, Stockholm Ahmet Makitan, District Court, Stockholm Milic Martinovic G. G. Military of Tribunal Lausanne, Division 1 Niyonteze Military of Tribunal Lausanne, Division 2 Trial location Trial Spain (continued) United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Sweden Switzerland 6. ELEMENTS WHICH DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SANCTIONS AND COMMENTS 134 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

The wide range of different factors influencing the definition and the implementation of sanctions explains just how difficult it is for sanctions imposed in isolation to change people’s behaviour. However, there are some elements which could today bring about a concrete improvement in the effectiveness of sanctions in the efforts by all parties to ensure greater respect for international humanitarian law. They are summa- rized below and include elements governing the effectiveness of sanctions, those that are inherent in sanctions imposed for violations of humanitarian law and those pertaining to the perpetrators.

A. Elements which determine the effectiveness of sanctions 1. Any message about the imposition of sanctions for violations of international humanitarian law must be accompanied by measures intended to improve adherence to the rules and respect for them. yy The necessary measures must be taken by all parties concerned to ensure that the applicable rules and sanc- tions are integrated into their system of reference, that they are known and properly applied. yy At the national level, judges must be trained in inter- national humanitarian law and they must take part in the process of interpretation and clarification of that field of law, in particular by taking into account studies carried out in that area at the international level. yy A rationalization effort must be undertaken to ensure that sanctions are more effective. It must deal with both the legal texts and the competent courts. yy The States should be encouraged to ensure the similarity of guarantees and procedures used by courts respon- sible for dealing with violations of international humani- tarian law. ANNEX 6 : ELEMENTS WHICH DETERMINE THE SANCTIONS 135

2. To ensure that sanctions play an effective preventive role, the potential perpetrators of violations of international humanitarian law are to be given detailed information about the different types of sanctions and how they are applied. yy At this level, education must enable individuals to identify clearly what is permissible and what is not. yy This education must also be provided for all who are instrumental in the application of international humani- tarian law, regardless of the group to which they belong, and including those acting under the mandate of the United Nations and competent regional organizations. yy The principles and rules promoted by the authority must be in line with the requirements of international humani- tarian law. yy Any aspect which is based on hatred of the enemy must be excluded from training programmes.

3. Training and education in international humanitarian law need to be integrated as unavoidable mechanisms which imply genuine reflex reactions, particularly among bearers of weapons. yy Information about sanctions must convey the fundamen- tally wrongful nature of the behaviour which is being sanctioned. yy The efficiency of sanctions and their dissuasive character depend on the degree to which the rule subject to the sanctions has been internalized by bearers of weapons. yy The aim of this internalization must be to prompt genuine reflex reactions among the bearers of weapons, leading to respect for the rule. 136 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

B. E lements relative to violations of humanitarian law 4. The concept of sanctions must incorporate prevention of a repetition of the crime and be based on a pragmatic and realistic approach. yy The definition, procedure and implementation of sanc- tions must be designed in such a way that they make it possible to prevent the repetition of such crimes. yy A pragmatic and realistic approach consists of searching for ways to prevent the crime from being committed or repeated, bearing in mind the resources available. It must respond to the dual challenge of conforming to the rules and principles of general international humanitarian law while adhering closely to the contingent requirements of the national framework. yy Sanctions cannot be defined in abstracto but must rather be defined in relation to the concept of justice; in that context, the complementary nature of transitional justice must be recognized. yy The above-mentioned pragmatic and realistic approach should also be able to provide guidelines for exercising universal jurisdiction. They should draw on the studies already carried out and be based, in particular, on the possible link which should exist between the perpetrator of the offence and the place of trial as well as on the modali- ties of co-operation between the States concerned.

5. Criminal sanctions remain the essential and unavoidable axis for the treatment of all serious violations of humanitarian law. yy Sanctions must help to reinforce the rules of humani- tarian law and the fundamental universal values which underpin them. yy Imprisonment must remain the central element in sanc- tioning serious violations of international humanitarian law. yy Criminal sanctions may not be viewed solely from the perspective of the prison sentence. In terms of effec­ tiveness, they must be perceived with regard to the ANNEX 6 : ELEMENTS WHICH DETERMINE THE SANCTIONS 137

context, that is, all elements enabling sanctions to have a greater impact on the individual to which they apply and on the society to which he belongs, with account being taken, in particular, of the cultural factor.

6. Sanctions for violations of humanitarian law must share some essential characteristics irrespective of the circumstances. yy For the perpetrator of violations, sanctions must be cer- tain in nature, that is, they must be automatic regardless of the perpetrator. The idea is that every perpetrator of violations knows that there is a price to pay. yy To be effective, sanctions must be imposed as quickly as possible after the act has been committed (need for justice to be rendered without delay). An initial reaction must take place without delay, albeit by combining dis- ciplinary and judicial measures. yy Sanctions should be implemented with respect for all aspects of the principle of equality. They must lead to all perpetrators being treated equally, irrespective of the group to which they belong. yy Sanctions should be pronounced as close as possible to the place where the crime has been committed and to the people on which they are intended to have an effect. In that context, international justice must aim to reinforce national capacities and, whatever the case, only consti- tute a transitory or complementary process. yy Delocalization should only be envisaged as a very last resort and should inevitably be accompanied by a local awareness-heightening mechanism.

7. Apart from the seriousness of the crime, other aspects need to be taken into account when selecting the sanction, in particular those linked to the context and the personal characteristics of the perpetrator (individualization). yy It is essential for the sanctions to be proportionate to the seriousness of the crime in order to avoid generating lack of comprehension and resentment among both the 138 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

victims and the perpetrators. This proportionality is a guarantee for all parties. yy The judge must adopt a synthetic approach prompting him to take account of the whole of the environment which led to the reprehensible act being committed. yy The principle of proportionality thus implies an under- standing of complex relations between several variables which judges have to take into account in order to avoid any disproportion. yy Sanctions must take account of the personality of every perpetrator, which implies that every violation must be considered separately.

8. In order for sanctions to play an effective preventive role in the society in question, they must be made public and be subject to appropriate dissemination measures. yy The effectiveness of a sanction is linked to its speed and the publicity given to it with regard to both the perpe- trator and the group. yy The dissemination obligation is fundamental because it is the means of informing and educating people about what a serious violation is and the consequences which it entails. yy The clarity of the rule and of the message which accom- panies it is indispensable for them to be effective. The message must cover the rationale which has led to the sanction and justifies the choice of that particular sanc- tion. It must also cover the entire process leading to the imposition of the sanction.

9. The aim of the various mechanisms for imposing sanctions (criminal or otherwise) must be to reinforce each other in order to ensure that the overall process is as effective as possible. yy These mechanisms should be based on clear rules which define the criteria to be respected in terms of impartiality, independence, publicity and compliance with the stan­ dards guaranteeing fair procedures, including the passing of the sentence. ANNEX 6 : ELEMENTS WHICH DETERMINE THE SANCTIONS 139

yy The large number of different sources of sanctions (juris- dictional, disciplinary, traditional or other) must give rise to a clear distribution of powers among the bodies. yy That is all the more important in systems which combine disciplinary and jurisdictional measures. The complemen- tarity should give priority to effectiveness and the mech- anisms should not be redundant. yy In that sense, the mechanisms of traditional justice should also be explored, while ensuring respect for the criteria referred to above.

C. Elements relative to perpetrators 10. Sanctions must lead the perpetrators to recognize their responsibility in the violation of humanitarian law and thus to help to enable the society as a whole to be aware of the impact of certain events which have affected it. yy The process set up must at least ensure that the perpe- trator has no choice other than to accept his responsibility and that the sanction is in accordance with the extent of his responsibility for the violations committed. yy As far as it is possible and beyond what has been referred to above, that process must allow the perpetrator of the violations to show evidence of regret and give him the opportunity to ask for forgiveness.

11. Subordinates must be given the opportunity to understand the consequences of their acts and to assume responsibility for them. yy Codes of conduct need to be developed which include simple rules incorporating in a practical manner the types of behaviour which are bound to generate respect for the principles and rules of humanitarian law, including the consequences associated with lack of respect for those principles. yy Individuals must also be informed of their rights and obligations with regard to an order which is a priori or manifestly illegal and the ensuing consequences. 140 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

yy Operational mechanisms need to be developed which allow subordinates to obtain clarification about orders that they are given, where they believed that the orders were not precise or manifestly illegal. yy Subordinates may not shelter behind the argument of superior order to avoid their responsibility.

12. Sanctions must first and foremost target the commanders responsible for mass crimes. yy Sanctions must not be linked solely to the direct nature of involvement in the conduct of a violation of the law but must also take account of the degree of responsibility in relation to the order given. yy The responsibility of military and civilian commanders and superior officers is not limited to the orders given but also covers lax control and deficiency in training. yy From an operational point of view, it is essential for the chain of command and the measures which may reason- ably be expected at each level in that chain to be clearly established.

13. The role of the instigators must be evaluated precisely and give rise to an involvement which is in keeping with their responsibility. yy The responsibility of the instigators in preparing the en- vironment which is conducive to violation of international humanitarian law by contributing, in particular, to the demonization of the enemy and the justification of the crimes which are committed against that enemy, has to be clearly recognized. ANNEX 6 : ELEMENTS WHICH DETERMINE THE SANCTIONS 141

14. In order to achieve its aim, the overall process of sanctions must ensure that the victims adhere to it and to that end take account of considerations related to social justice. yy Sanctions may be imposed on the perpetrator only after a previous quest for truth (no sentencing based on insuf- ficient evidence or reasoned out by analogy) and after the victims have been given responses in terms of reparations. yy The participation of victims and society in general in the process of justice will allow it to be given credibility and will enable the system to be adapted to each context. yy Transitional justice with the victim as its focus makes it possible to expand the classic framework of sanctions by integrating other aspects which must, however, not be confused with its original hard core. yy Recognition must be given to the role of victims in criminal justice, but that role may not go so far as to allow their participation in determining the quantum of the sentence. 7. LIST OF NATIONAL IHL COMMITTEES AND OTHER SIMILAR BODIES 144 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES TOTAL: 10 TOTAL: Yemen United Arab Emirates United Syrian Arab Republic Saudi Arabia Saudi Qatar Lebanon Kuwait Jordan Iran (Islamic Republic of) Egypt MIDDLE EAST TOTAL: 29 TOTAL: Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Morocco Namibia Nigeria Seychelles Sierra Leone AfricaSouth Sudan Swaziland Togo Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe Liberia Lesotho Kenya Guinea- Bissau Gambia Côte d'Ivoire Comoros Cape Verde Cape Burkina Faso Burkina Botswana Benin Algeria AFRICA TOTAL: 19 TOTAL: Mexico Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru & Tobago Trinidad Uruguay Honduras Guatemala Ecuador El Salvador Dominican Republic Dominican Costa Rica Colombia Chile Canada Brazil Bolivia Argentina THE AMERICAS : 103

Total TOTAL: 13 TOTAL: Sri Lanka Samoa Philippines New Zealand New Nepal Mongolia Malaysia Korea (Republic of) Japan Cook Islands China Indonesia Australia ASIA & PACIFIC TOTAL: 4 TOTAL: Turkmenistan Tajikistan Kyrgyzstan Kazakhstan CENTRAL ASIA Ireland Italy Lithuania Macedonia (former Yugoslav Republic of) Moldova (Republic of) Norway (2Poland committees) Romania Serbia Slovakia Spain Sweden (2 committees) Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom 28 TOTAL: Iceland Hungary Greece Germany Georgia France Finland Denmark Czech Republic Croatia Belgium Belarus Austria EUROPE ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 145

To disseminate and promote and IHL disseminate To evaluate domesticTo law with respect to IHL recommendations national prepare to to and regard this in authorities To ensure implementationTo of IHL by drawing up laws and regulations, and by developing policies respect international commitments ensure for to in this area teach andTo disseminate IHL among the military and civilians

Mandate • • • •

C - Foreign Affairs, Defence, Foreign Affairs, National , Environment and Tourism, Rotating the among Sub ommittee on the 1

Ministry of Defence was created. As of 30 August 2013 participating ministries participating Secretariat: NB: In a 2012, Representatives: Health Education, Culture, Interior, Justice, and Environment Chairmanship: Defence, Justice, Interior, Finance, Energy and Mines, Water Resources, Industry, Religious Affairs and Awkaf Information, Culture, Health, Education, National Professional and Education,Higher Training Education, Labour and Social Insurance, Sports, and National Solidarity, Youth General Directorate National for Security, General Command National of Gendarmerie, , Islamic Algerian Scouts, and the Consultative and Promotion the Commission for Protection of Human Rights. Qualifiedexperts and organizations may also be invited to take part in the work of the Commission. secretariat: and Chairmanship JusticeMinister of Composition Representatives: Identification and of Registration Cultural Property

Executive Executive 933/94 of

08-163 of 08-163

June 1994

June 2008

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 4 Decree No. 16 Operation: Internal regulations Established: 2008 basis:Legal Presidential Decree Established: 1994 basis:Legal TABLE OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (IHL) LAW HUMANITARIAN INTERNATIONAL ON COMMITTEES NATIONAL OF TABLE

committee

of Name and address Commission nationale nationale Commission internationalde droit humanitaire c/o Ministry of Justice 5, Cité Malqui, BT K, 2 n° Aqnoun Bin Algeria Tel.: +21321911766 Comisión de Aplicación de Comisión Internacional Derecho del (CADIH)Humanitario c/o Ministerio de Defensa Azopardo 250, Piso 13° Buenos1328 Aires Argentina +541143468877 Tel.: M word “Ministry” has been left out and the respective ministries are referred to as “Foreign Affairs,”“Justice,” etc. Country Algeria Argentina

1 ost of the members of National IHL Committees are representatives of State ministries, such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Justice To avoidetc. repetition, the 146 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To promoteTo knowledge of IHL, the Fundamental Principles of the Movement, and the correct use of the emblem in Australia work closelyTo with relevant government departments, the Australian Defence Force and Divisional IHL Committees to ensure the fulfilment IHL under international obligations Australia’s of and to assist in the development of government policy on IHL generateTo support for a more vigorous approach to IHL by government through contacts with parliamentarians, political parties, NGOs and the community wider promoteTo education and debate on current IHL issues encourageTo international respect for IHL and increased participation in IHL instruments, particularly the Asia-Pacific in region contributeTo to the development of IHL principles by the ICRC and other interested parties assistTo in reviewing Australian Red Cross policies and materials with regard to IHL

Mandate • • • • • • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, Geoff Skillen 1

Australian Red Cross Composition Secretariat: Representatives: Justice, Australian Red Cross, scholars and experts Chairmanship:

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Established: 1977 basis:Legal Administrative understanding Operation: Internal regulations

committee

of Name and address Australian Red Cross National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Ms Louise McCosker A/g National IHL Manager House Cross Red Cnr Hindmarsh Drive & Palmer St Garran ACT 2605 Australia Country Australia ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 147 To coordinateTo ratification of IHL instruments prepareTo for and follow up International Conferences of the Red Cross and Red Crescent To promoteTo ratification of and adherence to IHL comply to legislation national amend treaties, to with these treaties, and to contribute to the dissemination IHL of draw up advisoryTo opinions on Belarus’s position on issues connected to IHL, draft treaties, and national legislation on implementation examine proposalsTo from and coordinate the activities of bodies concerned with the implementation IHL of monitorTo the application of IHL at the national level cooperateTo and exchange information with ICRCthe international other organizations and involved in the implementation of IHL

Mandate • • • • • • • Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Defence, Foreign Affairs, Defence, Minister of Justice Minister of 1

Ministry of Justice of Ministry Representatives: Justice, Interior, Chancellery, scholars and Cross Red Austrian secretariat: and Chairmanship Foreign Affairs Secretariat: Representatives: Justice, Education, Interior, CIS Affairs, Health, Culture, Deputy Prime Minister, Council of Ministers, State Security Committee, scholars and Chairmanship: Composition

Ad hoc Ad

1242 of 1242

September 1997

mandates Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Order No. 19 Operation: Committee statutes of 26 January 1998 and internal regulations Established: 1988 basis:Legal Established: 1997 basis:Legal Council of Ministers

committee

of Name and address Interministerial GroupWorking on Disseminationthe of International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Völkerrechtsbüro Abt. 1/7 Ballhausplatz 2 Vienna 1014 Austria National Committee Implementation the for of International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Justice Kollectornaya 10 str., Minsk 220004 Belarus +375-17-2008545 Tel: Fax: +375-17-2201225 Country Austria Belarus 148 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To identifyTo and submit to the ministries concerned measures that need to be taken at the national IHL implement to level follow up andTo coordinate these measures assistTo the federal government through studies, reports, opinions, or proposals related to the development and application of IHL ensure effectiveTo implementation of and respect for IHL encourageTo the promotion and defence of IHL provisions its and rules popularize and teach IHL disseminate, To performTo other duties as instructed by the government, including giving opinions on any questions it to referred

Mandate • • • • • • • Ministry Foreign of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry of Justice of Ministry Decided by the Ministry 1

Ministry of the Interior Ministry Foreign of Affairs Foreign Affairs

Vice-Chairmanship: Affairs and Cooperation and Benin Red Cross Secretariat: Representatives: Cooperation, Defence, Justice, Interior, Security, Health, Family, Social Welfare and Affairs,Women’s Finance, Education and Scientific Research, Bar Association, and Benin Red Cross Chairmanship: Composition Representatives: of Secretariat: Justice, Interior, Health, Development Cooperation, Prime Minister, governments of the communities and regions, experts, and Chairmanship:

April

Royal Decree December

98-155 of 27 98-155

September 2001

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Decree of 6 the 2000 restructuring Committee Operation: Internal regulations of 14 No. 1998 Established: 1987 basis:Legal Established: 1998 basis:Legal committee

of Name and address Commission de droit interministérielle (CIDH)humanitaire c/o Ministère des Affaires Étrangères d’EgmontPalais 8, Petit Sablon 1000 Bruxelles Belgique Commission nationale nationale Commission pour la mise en œuvre internationaldu droit humanitaire c/o Ministère de la Justice, de la Législation et des Droits de l’Homme B.P. 976 Cotonou Benin Country Belgium Benin ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 149 To monitorTo the dissemination and implementation of IHL examine internalTo regulations and any of incorporation the for required amendments provisions of IHL in national legislation, and to propose their approval by the executive and authoritieslegislative

Mandate • •

Foreign Affairs, Defence, 1

Composition Representatives: Justice, Interior, Sustainable Development and SupremePlanning, Court, National Congress, scholars and secretariat: and Chairmanship Ministry Foreign of Affairs

Decree 23.345 of 218.456 of October 1998

August 1998 issued

December 1992

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 2 Operation: Resolution No. 17 by the President of the Republic and the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, which came into force on 30 Established: 1992 basis:Legal (CNPADIH) committee

of Name and address Comisión Nacional Nacional Comisión para Permanente la Aplicación del Internacional Derecho Humanitario c/o Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto Plaza Murillo, Ingavi esqu. Junín La Paz Bolivia Country Bolivia 150 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To open andTo broaden dialogue on any legal consider instruments may government the that for ratification and to discuss all the substantive issues before a draft cabinet memorandum is cabinet the presented to look atTo the socio-economic and political implications of the instrument under consideration assessTo the financial implications of ratifying instrumentthat assessTo the reporting obligations that may arise from ratifying the instrument and identify the ministries and departments that would have to report on specific aspects of the instrument analyseTo the legal implications of ratifying the instrument (for require instance, whether would it drafting new laws or reviewing the constitution) be able toTo respond to the international community (for instance, the United Nations Human Rights Commission) assessTo the benefits that Botswana would derive from being party to the instrument under consideration

Mandate • • • • • • • Foreign Affairs and Mr Thomas Dipowe, Director 1

Composition Representatives: International Cooperation, Defence, Justice and Security Director), Finance, Culture, Office of the Ombudsman, Local Government, Environmental Affairs, Labour and Home Affairs Chairmanship: of the Multilateral Affairs Department at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Established: 2002 M - committee

of Inter Committee on Treaties, and Conventions inisterial Protocols Name and address Country Botswana ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 151 To proposeTo to the relevant authorities measures needed to implement and disseminate IHL at the national level, particularly the Geneva Conventions, Additional their and Protocols, and other IHL treaties to which Brazil is party

Mandate •

Foreign Affairs, Defence, 1

Representatives: Culture, Education, Health, Justice, President’s Civil House and Special Secretariat Human Rights,for Federal Chamber Senate, of Deputies, and ICRC secretariat: and Chairmanship Ministry Foreign of Affairs Composition

Decree of November 2003

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 27 Operation: Internal regulations Established: 2003 basis:Legal committee

of Name and address Commissão Nacional Difusãopara e do Implementação Internacional Direito Brasil no Humanitário c/o Ministerio das Relaçoes Exteriores Palácio do Itamaraty, Anexo I, Sala 215-A Brazil (61) 6048Tel.: 411 Fax: (61) 322 9332 Country Brazil 152 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To facilitateTo the coordination of actions undertaken by the various ministries for the rights human protection the of and promotion examine governmentTo policies and strategies in connection with human rights provideTo technical support for the preparation of reports that Burkina Faso has to submit – particularly to the United Nations, the ICRC, and the African Commission on Human Rights and Peoples – in conformity with its conventional obligations in the areas of human rights and IHL look intoTo disputes regarding human rights and IHL involving the State and submitted by the government contributeTo to the introduction of human rights and IHL education in formal and non-formal education spread informationTo on human rights and IHL within all State bodies entrusted with respecting particularly forces armed rules, the humanitarian

Mandate • • • • • • Foreign Affairs and Secretary-General the of 1

Permanent technical secretary Composition Representatives: Regional Cooperation, Defence, Security, Social Affairs and National Solidarity, Promotion of Women, Basic Education and the Elimination of Illiteracy, Land Administration and Decentralization, Secondary and Higher Education and Scientific Research, Labour, Employment and Youth, Health, Environment, Finance and Budget; and Burkinabé Red Cross Society Chairmanship: Ministry for the Promotion of Human Rights Secretariat: nominated by decree adopted by the Council Ministersof

Decree 2005-100/

February 2005

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. PRES/PM/MPDH of 23 Established: 2005 basis:Legal committee

of Name and address Comité interministériel des humains droits et internationaldu droit humanitaire c/o Ministère de la droits des Promotion humains BP 85211 Ouagadougou Faso Burkina +226Tel.: 503-164-20 Country Burkina Faso ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 153 To recommendTo ratification of IHL instruments facilitateTo the implementation of obligations arising from this body in particular of law, by reviewing and advising on national legislation and administrative measures (repression violations of IHL,of protection guarantees the emblems, of for protected persons) adviseTo on disseminating and providing training in IHL in Canada (aimed at the armed forces, servants, organizations, civil humanitarian police, medicallegal and professions, schools and universities, journalists public) general the and pertinent and encourage government the To organizations undertake to activities strengthen to and disseminate IHL, and to coordinate these activities recommendTo the adoption of measures to promote national implementation in other States, drawing on the resources and expertise available in Canada maintainTo a pool of personnel with expertise in IHL and ensure links with other national committees and the ICRC

Mandate • • • • • • Foreign Affairs and Department of National 1

Canadian Red Cross Society Composition Representatives: International Trade, National Defence, International Trade, Justice, Solicitor-General (represented by Police), Mounted Canadian Royal Canadian International Development Agency the and Society Chairmanship: Defence Secretariat:

March 1998 March 1998

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 18 Operation: In with accordance terms of reference of 18 Established: 1998 basis:Legal Memorandum of understanding of committee

of Name and address Canadian National Committee for Law Humanitarian c/o Canadian Red Cross Society Metcalfe170 St., Suite 300 Ottawa, Ontario K2P 2P2 Canada Country Canada 154 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To protectTo human rights and promote and spread knowledge of human rights and IHL developTo a national plan of action for human rights and, once approved by the Council of Ministers, its ensure implementation periodicallyTo draw up and present reports on the implementation of international human rights and IHL instruments review, and proposeTo to the authorities, legislative and administrative measures ensuring implementation IHL of

Mandate • • • •

Foreign Affairs, Justice, Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Justice of Ministry 1

Representatives: Defence, Interior, Education, Health and Culture secretariat: and Chairmanship Ministry Foreign of Affairs Composition Representatives: Justice, Health, Education, Culture, Social Social Culture, Education, Health, Justice, Communication, Youth, National Assembly, Bar Association, Institutes for Youth and Affairs, national trade unions, Women’s association of municipalities, NGOs and Cape Verde Red Cross Chairmanship:

June August

Decree Decree 19/2001 of

1229 of 31

September 2001

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal law No. 24 No. 1994 Operation: Internal regulations 1 of 1995 Established: 2001 basis:Legal Established: 1994 basis:Legal

committee

of Name and address Comité Nacional para os Direitos Humanos (CNDH) c/o Ministry of Justice 205 Praia Verde Cape President: Mme Zelinda Cohen Comissão Nacional para os Direitos Humanos e a Cidadania – Praia 191 C.P. Verde Cape Comisión Nacional de de Nacional Comisión Humanitario Derecho (CNDH) c/o Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Dirección Jurídica PisoTeatinos 180, 16, Santiago de Chile Chile (00562)Tel.: 6794.237/238 Fax: (00562) 699.5517 Country Cape Verde Cape Chile ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 155 To promoteTo IHL and its implementation, and to spread knowledge of this body of law promoteTo international cooperation in connection with the dissemination and implementation IHL of conductTo research in specific areas of IHL To promoteTo the incorporation of international human rights standards and IHL in domestic law promoteTo compliance with international obligations with regard to human rights and IHL and monitor commitments in this connection coordinateTo with the national system for caring for and compensating victims guide theTo designing and implementation of strategies to promote and publicize human rights and IHL defineTo guidelines for establishing and operating an information system, in order to track and assess the situation with regard to human rights and IHL and the impact of the overall policy in areas these

Mandate • • • • • • • •

Interior, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Affairs, Defence, Vice-Presidency of the 1

Republic Comisión Intersectorial Permanente para los los para Permanente Intersectorial Comisión Internacional Derecho el Humanos y Derechos Humanitario Representatives: Justice, Defence, Labour, Health and Social Security, Agriculture and Rural Development, Education, Culture and the director of the Presidential Agency for Social Action and International Cooperation Chairmanship: Composition Representatives: Justice, Education, Administration of Cultural Cultural of Administration Education, Justice, Heritage, People’s Liberation Army and the Cross Red Chinese secretariat: and Chairmanship Cross Red Chinese

Decision Decree November

November 2007

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 24 of 2 4100 which2011 created a national system for human rights international and law humanitarian The system national is composed of six sub- systems, one of them covering the area of IHL conflict . armed and This coordinated area is by a technical on group IHL conflict. armed and Established: 2007 basis:Legal of the Government of Established: 2011 basis:Legal 8, Beixingiao

committee

of No. Santiao Dongcheng District Beijing 100007 China +861064028411 Tel.: +861064029928 Fax: Name and address National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Red Cross Society of China Comisión Intersectorial Intersectorial Comisión los para Permanente Derechos Humanos y el Internacional Derecho Humanitario Programa Presidencial de DH/DIH Calle 7 6-54 Casa Republicana. Bogota, C. D. Colombia Web: http://www. derechoshumanos.gov. co/Paginas/DDHH.aspx Country China Colombia 156 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To strengthenTo institutional capacity to a) improve social conditions, b) Colombians enable to exercise their rights and c) promote and increase IHL for respect structureTo a comprehensive human rights and IHL policy, with a view to promoting and guaranteeing civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, and the application of IHL with connection in activities coordinate To ensuring respect for and implementing IHL contributeTo to designing and implementing a coordination mechanism for the entire country, which would entail defining various sets of powers and responsibilities and drafting measures to strengthen capacity institutional and management design, implement,To monitor and evaluate public policy on IHL and armed conflict assistTo the Intersectoral Commission on Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law in plans, various implementing and developing programmes, projects, and initiatives related to IHL and armed conflict developTo activities related to IHL and armed policies sectoral in incorporation conflictfor developTo ways of incorporating international standards in domestic law put into practiceTo the Intersectoral Commission’s guidelines for monitoring the international implementation Colombia’s of commitments obligations and

Mandate • • • • • • • • • Presidential Presidential Defence, Interior. Defence, 1

Technical Group on International Humanitarian Humanitarian International on Group Technical and Conflict Armed Law Representatives: Technical Secretariat:Technical Programme for Human Rights and IHL Composition

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal committee

of Name and address Country Colombia (continued) ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 157 To liaise betweenTo the government and other parties concerned on the issue of ensuring IHL for respect promoteTo ratification and implementation of IHL instruments, and to assist the government in implementing the treaties and conventions that it has ratified fosterTo the development of IHL, help make it better known, and promote attendance at relevant international forums identifyTo IHL conventions relevant to Cook Islands identifyTo IHL deficienciesexisting in Cook Islands law increaseTo knowledge of and respect for IHL

Mandate • • • • • • Foreign Affairs, Justice, Foreign Affairs, Defence, Dr James Gosselin Government representative 1

Ministry Foreign of Affairs Representatives: Emergency Management, Health, Police, and the Cook Islands Red Cross Chairmanship: Secretariat: Composition Representatives: Justice, Social Affairs, Secretary-General of the Comoros Red Crescent and Secretary- General Grand the of Mufti Chairmanship: for human rights and humanitarian affairs (Ministry Justice) of

Decree Cabinet 03 -104/PR of

November 2003

March 2011

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 17 1 Operation: Internal regulations Established: 2003 basis:Legal Established: 2011 basis:Legal decision CM 11(072) committee

of Name and address Commission du droit interministérielle humanitaire international (CIDIH) c/o M. Maanfou Mohamed Secrétaire général Croissant-Rouge Comorien Boulevard de la Ligue ArabesEtats Moroni Comoros Tel./Fax: +269 730 664 National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Secretary of Foreign Affairs and Immigration, Dr James Gosselin Ministry Foreign of Affairs & Immigration Government of the Cook Islands PO Box Rarotonga 105, Cook Islands (+682)Tel.: 29 347 Fax: (+682) 21 247 Country Comoros Cook Islands Cook 158 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To make recommendationsTo and proposals, to adopting national with to government, the regard measures for implementing IHL and elaborating related domestic and regulations laws developTo measures and provide support as for, well as promote, the dissemination of IHL in State institutions and in the wider society participateTo in meetings, seminars and government the by conferences organized promoteTo the incorporation of IHL in academic curricula, and provide support for the pertinent authorities design measuresTo for implementing and ensuring respect for IHL ensure respectTo for and effective implementation IHL of review andTo draw up laws and regulations for the application of IHL in areas where national legislation needs to be supplemented or government the to them submit and amended, ensure thatTo IHL is applied in Côte d’Ivoire and dissemination promotion, the encourage To IHL of teaching

Mandate • • • • • • • • •

Red Cross Society Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry of Justice and Public Foreign Affairs and Worship, 1

Ministry Foreign of Affairs Bar Association and Red Cross Côte d’Ivoire

Ministry Foreign of Affairs Public Security, Justice and Pardon, Public Education, Culture, Juveniles and Sports, the General Office, Prosecutor’s legislature, the the presidency, the judiciary, the University of Costa Rica, the National University, the Office of the Ombudsman, the National Council of Rectors, the Lawyers’ College and the Costa Rican Red Cross secretariat: and Chairmanship Membership: Composition Representatives: of Secretariat: Justice, Interior, Health, Economy, Higher Education, Society Côte of d’Ivoire Chairmanship: Freedom Vice-Chairmanship:

Executive Executive Decree 32077-RE November

216, 4 216, 96-853 of

October 1996

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Decree No. of 21 May 2004 –entry into force on the same day (published in La Gaceta: Oficial Diario No. 2004) No. 25 Established: 2004 basis:Legal Established: 1996 basis:Legal committee

of Name and address Comisión Costarricense Costarricense Comisión Internacional Derecho de Humanitario Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto Casa Amarilla 10027-1000 Apartado San José Costa Rica (506)Tel.: 8233-6625 Fax: (506) 8233-6625 Commission interministérielle nationale pour la mise du droit en œuvre humanitaire international c/o Ministère de la Justice et des Libertés publiques Abidjan Box V 107 P.O. Côte d’Ivoire 20322432 +225 Tel.: Country Costa Rica Côte d’Ivoire Côte ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 159 To coordinateTo the activities of State bodies involved in protecting and promoting IHL, including the Croatian parliament and the Office of the Ombudsman, as well as the activities of organizations non-governmental evaluate theTo implementation of IHL in Croatia and make recommendations, in particular for the creation of ad hoc working groups to deal with the implementationissue of

Mandate • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, 1

Ministry Foreign of Affairs Composition Representatives: Justice, Interior, Culture, Administration, Health, Education, Government Human Rights Office, scholars and the Croatian Red Cross Chairmanship: Secretariat:

13 July 200013

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal of Established: 2000 basis:Legal Government decision committee

of Name and address Croatian National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Croatian Red Cross Ulica14 Crvenog kriza Zagreb 10000 Croatia +385Tel.: 1 4655 812 Fax: +385 1 4550 072 Email: [email protected] [email protected] c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration Department for the UN Rights Human and N. S. ZringskogTrg. 7-8 Zagreb 10000 Croatia 964 14569 +385 Tel.: Fax: +385 1 4597416 Country Croatia 160 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To monitorTo and evaluate current issues related to the development IHL of monitorTo and evaluate the implementation of IHL in the Czech Republic, including the practice of judicial and administrative authorities and the forces armed of activities of practice If necessary, to set up ad hoc working groups to deal with specific issues related to IHL submit recommendationsTo to stakeholders and proposals concerning, in particular, the legislative and other measures to ensure fulfilment of commitments of the Czech Republic deriving from IHL, including of further negotiation for recommendations international agreements in the area of IHL evaluate itsTo work and to adopt an action plan for the next period at regular intervals, usually two years promoteTo the dissemination of IHL within the state administration, armed forces security and forces of the Czech Republic, members of Integrated Rescue System, schools universities and participateTo in the preparation of scientific projects in the area of IHL cooperateTo with the National Committees for the implementation of IHL of other states and with particularly organizations, international with International Committee of the Red Cross cooperateTo with Czech and foreign experts in issues of IHL publish informationTo on their activities in cooperation with the Czech Red Cross through websites its

Mandate • • • • • • • • • • Ministry of October as 2011

Ministry of Defence and Foreign Affairs, Defence 1

Representatives: and the Czech Red Cross Membership is open to central State Health, Interior, (such Justice, as authorities Education and Culture), by accession in Foreign Affairs Vice-Chairmanship: Composition writing to the agreement of well as to academic institutions, by approval of the Committee. secretariat: and Chairmanship the Czech Red Cross

October 2011

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 10 between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Defence and the Czech Red Cross Operation: Internal regulations attached to the agreement Established: 2011 basis:Legal Agreement of committee

of Name and address National Committee for of implementation the International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Tuscany Palace Hradcanske namesti 5 00 Prague 1 118 The Czech Republic Country Czech Czech Republic ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 161 To ensure theTo application of IHL by reviewing administrative measures for meeting the obligations arising from IHL treaties, particularly in the areas of disseminating and teaching IHL coordinateTo the implementation of these measures serveTo the government in an advisory capacity To recommendTo measures for improving domestic implementation IHL of promoteTo draft laws and regulations for the application of IHL treaties disseminateTo IHL among State authorities promoteTo the inclusion of IHL in formal curricula

Mandate • • • • • • •

Foreign Affairs, Armed Foreign Affairs, Defence, Secretary State of Foreign for 1

Ministry Foreign of Affairs Affairs Representatives: Labour, Health, Culture, Education, Forces, Sports and Leisure, Public Prosecutor’s Office, National Police, legal office of theexecutive branch and the Chairmanship: Composition Representatives: Civil Health, Education, Interior, Justice, Defence, armed forces, Judge Advocate General Red Danish Cross the and Vice-Chairmanship: and Chairmanship Ministry Foreign of Affairs Secretariat:

131-99 of 131-99 March 1999

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 30 Operation: Internal regulations Established: 1982 basis:Legal Government decision of July 198216 Established: 1995 basis:Legal Presidential Decree committee

of Name and address Governmental Red Cross Committee c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Asiatisk Plads 2 Copenhagen DK-1448 Denmark +45Tel.: 33 92 00 00 Fax: +45 32 54 05 33 Comisión Nacional Nacional Comisión para Permanente la Aplicación del Internacional Derecho Humanitario c/o Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores Departamento Jurídico Independencia Avenida 756, Santo Domingo Republica Dominicana Tel.: 1-809-5321-586 1-809-9857-550 Fax: Country Denmark Dominican Republic 162 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To promoteTo accession to IHL instruments prepareTo draft laws, regulations and instructions IHL implementing for promoteTo the dissemination of IHL and its inclusion at all levels of the educational system and pertinent in training programmes monitorTo the application of IHL in the field and to make recommendations in this regard develop, promoteTo and coordinate a national plan of action for ensuring the dissemination and application of IHL analyseTo recommendations made by proposeinternational organizations to and measures for their implementation at the national level promoteTo cooperation between the government connection international organizationsand in with strengthening respect IHL for promote implementation IHL, of To coordinate activities of the agencies concerned, and make proposals decision-makers to proposeTo an annual national plan for disseminating IHL promoteTo training of public officials responsible implementationfor IHL of contributeTo to training these officials, by developing training programmes exchange informationTo and experiences with other bodies concerned with IHL

Mandate • • • • • • • • • • • • Foreign Affairs, National Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry Foreign of Affairs Minister of Justice (or his 1

Ecuadorean Red Cross Secretariat: Representatives: Defence, Security and the Police, Social for Affairs, Commission Congressional Codification, and Congressional Legislation Commission on Human Rights, Supreme Court of Justice, and the Ecuadorean Red Cross Chairmanship: Composition Representatives: Justice, Interior, Higher Education, Higher General Justice, Interior, Intelligence Service, the Egyptian Red Crescent Society, the ICRC and experts Chairmanship: deputy)

2012 August

Executive Executive Decree 1741 of 16 1741

December 2012

March 2007 issued

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 2006 Operation: Ministerial Agreement of 0000074 N° 9 by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs 22 Established: 2006 basis:Legal Decree of the President Re-established: basis:Legal of 2012 No.1124 by the Minister of Justice, issued on

committee

of Name and address Comisión Nacional Nacional Comisión la aplicaciónpara del Internacional Derecho Humanitario c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Comercio Integración y Carrión E1-76 de Agosto 10 y Av. Quito Ecuador +59322993200 Tel.: +59322993200 Fax: National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Justice Lazoughli Square Cairo Egypt Tel.: +202-792-2269 Fax: +202-795-6059 Country Ecuador Egypt ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 163 To adviseTo the government on measures for implementing, applying and disseminating IHL at level national the coordinateTo the dissemination and implementation of IHL instruments, such as the Geneva Conventionsfour Additional their and Protocols, International the for prepare Conferences To of the Red Cross and Red Crescent and other IHL to international conferences related monitorTo new developments in IHL and assess their implications for Finland

Mandate • • • • Ministry of Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Defence, Foreign Affairs, Defence, 1

Representatives: Justice, Interior, Public Security, Education, Health, Treasury, Public Prosecutor’s Office, Procurator for the Defence of Human Rights and the Salvadorian Red Cross Society secretariat: and Chairmanship Foreign Affairs Composition Representatives: Interior, Education, Social Affairs and Health, armed forces, Finnish Society of Humanitarian Law, the Finnish section of Amnesty Red CrossInternational, Finnish the and secretariat: and Chairmanship Foreign Affairs

Decision November

118 of 4 118

December 1993

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 1997 Operation: Internal regulations 8 Established: 1997 basis:Legal Presidential Decree Established: 1993 basis:Legal of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, S) E - committee

of (CIDIHHumanitario Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores Dirección de Desarrollo Sociointegral Calle El Pedregal y Boulevard Cancillería Ciudad Merliot Antiguo Cuscatlán El Salvador 503-2231-1311 Tel.: Fax: 503- 2231-1348 Name and address Comité Interinstitucional Interinstitucional Comité Internacional Derecho de Finnish National Committee for International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Box 176 P.O. 22 Laivastokatu Helsinki00161 Finland Country El SalvadorEl Finland 164 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To handle anyTo problem concerning emergency situations humanitarian exchange informationTo on the mechanisms situations such with deal to required prepareTo recommendations on the form humanitarian aid should take in a specific crisis monitorTo the application of IHL and make proposals in this regard

Mandate • • • • Subcommittee “E” has the following duties: Executive, judiciary and A lawyer 1

Composition Representatives: legislative brancheslegislative government, of private individuals, and civil society including the Chairmanship:

2007-292

March 2007 on

December 1996.

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Law No. of 5 the National Advisory Commission on Human Rights Decree no. 2007-1137 of 26 July 2007 on the composition and functioning of the National Advisory Commission on Human Rights Operation: Duties humanitarianrelated to law and humanitarian action are carried out by sub-committee “E” on “Humanitarian action which and law,” was established on 10 Established: 1947 basis:Legal committee

of Name and address Commission nationale nationale Commission consultative des droits (CNCDH)de l’homme c/o Bureau du Premier ministre 35, rue Saint-Dominique 75700 Paris France Country France ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 165 To promoteTo ratification of IHL treaties and measuresdevelopment the new domestic for of implementation IHL of

Mandate • Interior, Foreign Affairs, Department of State 1

Justice

Representatives: Defence, Justice, Health, Social Welfare and AffairsWomen’s Chairmanship: Composition for

August

Letter Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal for Justice, 12 1999 Established: 1999 basis:Legal from the President’s Office to the Department of State committee

of Name and address Interministerial Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Department of State Justice for Mumar Kaddafi Avenue Banjul Gambia Tel.: +220-227-238 +220-225-352 Fax: Country Gambia 166 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To prepareTo advisory opinions at the request of the Government of IHL issues. presentTo proposals to the President of Georgia on the acceding to IHL treaties. prepareTo proposals in order to ensure compliance with international IHL obligations undertaken by Georgia and present the proposals amendments make order to in government the to the legislationto promoteTo implementation of IHL programmes cooperation in activities educational various and with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). reportTo on national achievements to the International Conference Red the Cross, of UN the Secretary National General of meetings the and IHLCommittees for

Mandate • • • • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, Minister of Justice (or his/her 1

established under Ministry of representative) Secretariat: Justice Representatives: Justice, Internal Affairs, Correction Legal and Assistance, Education and Science, Culture and Monument Protection, Labour, Health and Social Affairs, Environment Protection, Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from accommodation Territories, Occupied the and refugees of Georgia, Office of the State Minister Reintegration, for National Security Commission, the Ministry of Finance, the Office of the main Prosecutor and the Revenues’ service, ICRC (observer status) and the Georgian Red Cross Society (observer status) The invited membership of the Commission shall be open to recognised academic experts in Public International Law, IHL and International Criminal Law. Parliament of Georgia shall be also requested to participate in the work of the Commission. Chairmanship: Composition

2011 October

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal N408-1 of 28 2011 Operation: Statute National the of Inter- Agency Commission on the Implementation Internationalof LawHumanitarian Re-established: basis:Legal Resolution of the Government of Georgia gency gency A - committee

of Inter National Commission on Implementation the of International Law Humanitarian c/o Public international DepartmentLaw of the Ministry of Justice of GorgasaliGeorgia, 24, Georgia. Tbilisi. 0114 str. Name and address Country Georgia ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 167 To be a forumTo for consultation and coordination between the and the various departments federal government the of focus onTo developing, disseminating and IHLimplementing

Mandate • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, University professor 1

German Red Cross Composition Secretariat: Representatives: Justice, Interior, scholars, and the German Red Cross Chairmanship:

German Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Established: 1973 basis:Legal Red Cross Statutes of 1993 Operation: Internal regulations

committee

of Name and address German Red Cross Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o German Red Cross Headquarters 58Carstennstr. 12205 Berlin Germany Web: http://www. drk.de/ueber-uns/ auftrag/humanitaeres- voelkerrecht/ kurse-gremien/ fachausschuss- englisch.html Country Germany 168 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

To help the MinistryTo of Foreign Affairs carry out its duties more efficiently by advising it on the implementation of IHL by the administration and agencies public put forwardTo initiatives and proposals to encourage civil society to take action in all matters IHL related to proposals and recommendations make To concerning legislation to meet the country’s obligations under IHL treaties; to propose the ratification of such treaties; to advise the government on promoting IHL at national and international levels; and to recommend ways of disseminating IHL to the media, NGOs, social partners, schools, agencies, etc. promoteTo programmes for disseminating IHL as widely as possible liaise withTo academic circles and agencies dealing with IHL-related matters, with similar countries, other in agencies and authorities and with the ICRC and other international organizations

Mandate • • • • • Foreign Affairs, National University law professor 1

Composition Representatives: Defence, Justice,Defence, Internal Affairs, Public Administration and Decentralization, Public EducationOrder, and Religious Affairs, Health and Social Solidarity, Culture, General Secretariat of the New Generation, Directorate of Political and Emergency Planning, scholars and the Chairmanship:

December

2/53482/0022 2/14275/0022 of

June 2005

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. of 24 2003, as modified by Ministerial Decree No. 23 Established: 2000 basis:Legal Ministerial Decree committee

of Name and address Committee for the Implementation Dissemination and of International Law Humanitarian c/o Legal Department Ministry Foreign of Affairs 2 Zalokosta Athens 106-71 Greece Country Greece ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 169 To recommendTo – to the government – measures to ensure implementation of IHL submit draftTo legislation and regulations to the president Guatemala consideration of for in – connection with ensuring implementation of IHL spread knowledgeTo of IHL within State institutions public general the among and inform theTo Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the committee’s willingness to represent Guatemala at international fora dealing with IHL design activitiesTo to promote respect for IHL promoteTo and strengthen respect for human rights and IHL

Mandate • • • • • • December

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Defence, Government, Parliament, 1

Ministry of Justice of Ministry Composition Representatives: Representatives: Justice, Institute of Social Communication, civil UNsociety, international organizations and and the Guinea-Bissau Red Cross secretariat: and Chairmanship Working group on IHL set up on 18 2012. Interior, Education, Health, Presidential Presidential Health, Education, Interior, Commission Human for Rights, Secretariat for Peace, judiciary, Congress, Public Prosecutor’s Office, Human Rights Procurator, Bar Association and the secretariat: and Chairmanship Foreign Affairs

Decree 2009

948-99 of

December 1999

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 28 N° 6/ Established: 1999 basis:Legal Government Agreement Established: 2009 basis:Legal

committee

of Name and address Comisión Guatemalteca Guatemalteca Comisión la Aplicaciónpara del Internacional Derecho Humanitario c/o Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores 2ª Avenida Reforma 4-17, Zona 10 Ciudad Guatemala Guatemala 502-2410-0000, Tel.: ext.1401 Fax: 502-2 410-0198 Comissão Nacional para Humanos Direitos os c/o do Brasil Av. Meteorologia da Junto Bissau Rep. da Guinée Bissau Country Guatemala Guinea- Guinea- Bissau 170 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To promoteTo the dissemination of IHL at the level national assessTo the compatibility of domestic legislation with the obligations resulting from the Geneva Conventions Additional their and Protocols, and other instruments of IHL to which Honduras is party, and to promote the adaptation of domestic law in accordance with those treaties promoteTo the application and dissemination of IHL through the adoption of normative, legislative, judicial and administrative measures, particular, in to prevent grave violations of IHL and protect the red cross, red crescent and red crystal emblems, as other protectiveas well signals and signs promoteTo the teaching of IHL in institutions of higher learning and, particularly, the inclusion of IHL in training programmes for legal advisers in the armed forces and other civil servants heritage national that protected sites ensure To under IHL are marked

Mandate • • • • • Foreign Affairs, 1

Composition Representatives: Defence, Interior and Justice, Public presidential the Health, Education, Security, administration, Honduran Institute of Anthropology and History, Bar Association, Council for Higher Education and the Representatives of the legislature and the judiciary, of civil society, and of international organizations may also be invited when considered appropriate.

,

La GacetaLa April 2007,

31, 283)31, of

April 2007

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal of 20 published in the official gazette ( No. 20 Established: 2007 basis:Legal Government Agreement

committee

of Name and address Comisión Comisión Interinstitucional de Hondurieña Internacional Derecho Humanitario Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores Dirección de Asuntos Especiales Bulevard Kuwait Antigua Casa Presidencial, a junto la Corte Suprema de Justicia D.M.C Tegucigalpa, Honduras 504Tel.: 234 94 84 Country Honduras ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 171 To adviseTo the government on IHL issues promoteTo the dissemination of IHL within the country, particularly in institutions of higher or secondary education, and in the armed and security forces, and to make recommendations in this regard help governmentTo authorities in deliberations connected with negotiating and acceding to IHL treaties and to contribute to the elaboration of treatiesnew consultTo and cooperate with the ICRC exchange ideasTo with similar committees in member States of the European Union, especially neighbouring countries adviseTo the government on interpreting IHL and on implementing it domestically be a forumTo for discussing and spreading knowledge of IHL

Mandate • • • • • • • Ministry of Defence Foreign Affairs, Defence, Foreign Affairs, Justice, Ministry Foreign of Affairs Ministry Foreign of Affairs 1

Hungarian Red Cross Vice-Chairmanship: Secretariat: Representatives: and Education, Health, Justice, Interior, Cultural Heritage, Social Affairs and Family Chairmanship: Composition Representatives: Education, Health, Social Affairs and the Chairmanship:

March

March 2000 2095/2000 (V.9.)

October 2007

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. of 9 Operation: Revised statutes of 29 2001 24 Established: 2000 basis:Legal Decree Executive Established: 2007 basis:Legal Established by decision of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,

committee

of Name and address National Committee for the Dissemination Implementation and of International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs International and European Law Department Nagy Imre tér 4 Budapest 1027 Hungary +36Tel.: 1 458 1142 Fax: +36 1 458 1091 Icelandic National Committee on International Law Humanitarian Rauði kross Íslands / Icelandic Red Cross +354Tel.: 570 4016 Mobile phone: +354 9090 893 Fax: +354 570 4010 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www. redcross.is/ Country Hungary Iceland 172 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To formulateTo government policies on IHL conductTo research into the national implementation of IHL, draft national laws and regulations, and develop training programmes in IHL contributeTo to the dissemination of IHL

Mandate • • • Directorate Law and Human Rights, 1

Composition Representatives: Foreign Affairs, Interior, Defence, Health, Culture and Coordinating Tourism, Ministry for Political, Legal and Security Affairs, armed forces, scholars, and the Indonesian Red Cross Society secretariat: and Chairmanship of International Law within the Directorate General Legal Administrative of Affairs the in Ministry of Law and Human Rights

Decree Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Established: 1980 basis:Legal of Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia Number M.01.PR.09.01-1980 Operation: Decree of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number AHU-62. PR.01.02.TAHUN 2008 regarding the Establishment of the Permanent Committee on the Implementation and Research Internationalon Humanitarian Law of Directoratethe General of Legal Administrative Affairs (yearly updated by the Decree of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights) committee

of Name and address Permanent Committee Committee Permanent Implementation the on Research and of International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Law and Human Rights Directorate General of Legal Administrative Affairs Directorate of International Law Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav 6-7 Jakarta Indonesia 5202387,Tel.: 5202390 Country Indonesia ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 173 To developTo and present for approval suitable measures for implementing IHL at the national level monitorTo compliance with IHL at the national level teach andTo promote the principles of IHL among the armed forces and the general public and in educational institutions representTo the government on issues related to IHL international fora and national at coordinateTo the exchange of information with international organizations and regional deal withTo IHL-related issues in connection with refugees, prisoners of war and other victims of war To assistTo the government in implementing and IHLpromoting help to increaseTo knowledge of IHL in Ireland prepareTo for International Conferences of the Red Cross and Red Crescent

Mandate • • • • • • • • • Iranian Red Foreign Affairs, Defence, Foreign Affairs, Defence, Department of Foreign Affairs 1

Representatives: Justice, Interior, Health, and Armed Forces secretariat: and Chairmanship Crescent Composition Representatives: Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Education Science,and Attorney-General’s Office, Defence Forces, Irish Aid and the Irish Red Cross Chairmanship: (Legal Division)

19651T/77125 April 2008

H

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. May 1999of 17 (Statutes of the Committee) of 29 Established: 1999 Legal basis and operation: Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers Established: 2008 basis:Legal Government Decision committee

of Name and address Iranian National National Iranian Committee on Law Humanitarian c/o Iranian Red Crescent Society Peace Building Vali Asr Ave. Tehran Islamic Republic of Iran +98Tel.: 21 88201072 Fax: +98 21 88201073 Email: [email protected] Web: www.rcs.ir National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Department of Foreign Affairs 80 St Stephen’s Green Dublin 2 Ireland +353Tel.: 1 4780822 Country Iran (IslamicIran of)Republic Ireland 174 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To review measuresTo for bringing domestic legislation in line with IHL review theTo amendments to domestic law that are necessary for suppressing war crimes and other violations of IHL study:To means of spreading knowledge of IHL and of implementing and teaching it: technical aspects of IHL; ways to exchange information; and other matters considered necessary by the Committee

Mandate • • • Prime Minister, Foreign Prime Minister, Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry Foreign of Affairs 1

Japanese Red Cross Society Representatives: Health Education, Justice, Affairs, Defence, and Labour, scholars, and the Japanese Red Cross Society Secretariat: Composition Representatives: Justice, judiciary, scholars and the Chairmanship:

Meeting April 1999

215bis of215bis

February 1998

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 16 held in representatives by assuming public functions Established: 1988 basis:Legal Reorganized by Ministry Foreign of Affairs Decree Established: 1999 basis:Legal committee

of Name and address Commissione di Studio per l’adeguamento dell’ordinamento accordi agli giuridico e alle di regole diritto umanitario internazionale c/o Ministro degli Affari Esteri Servizio Contenzioso del Diplomatico Trattati e Affari Legislativi Ufficio 1 Piazzale1, della Farnesina 00199 Roma Italia +39Tel.: 64 759223 Fax: +39 64 759430 National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Japanese Red Cross Society Shiba Daimon1-3 Minato-Ku1-Chome 105-8521 Tokyo Japan +81Tel.: 3 3438-1311 33435-8509 3 +81 Fax: Country Italy Japan ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 175 To deviseTo and implement the policies, strategies, plans and programmes for raising awareness of the principles of IHL at the national level promote,To together with the ICRC and other parties concerned, efforts to disseminate the principles of IHL exchange informationTo and experiences Arab, internationalwith and national, regional with concerned commissions and organizations IHL and strengthen ties with them carryTo out research and studies for the parties concerned, present proposals to them and give them advice issue publicationsTo on IHL and ways to it implement adopt,To together with the parties concerned, recommendations and reports related to IHL and its development help improveTo legislation related to IHL

Mandate • • • • • • • Jordanian Red Crescent Red Jordanian Prime Minister, Foreign Prime Minister, Appointed by the King 1

Jordanian Red Crescent Crescent Red Jordanian Vice-Chairmanship: Secretariat: Representatives: Health, Education, Interior, Affairs, Justice, Directorate of Military Courts, Directorate of Public Security, Directorate of Civil Defence, Jordan University, National Assembly, experts appointed by the chairman of the committee, (represented Crescent Red Jordanian the and by its president) Chairmanship: Composition

August Law

63 of 20

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 2002 Operation: Regulations issued by the committee Established: 1999 basis:Legal committee

of Name and address National Committee Implementation the for of International Law Humanitarian c/o Jordan National Commission Box 922086P.O. Amman 11192 Jordan +96265529142Tel.: +96265529745 Fax: Country Jordan 176 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To submit recommendationsTo and proposals to the government on meeting obligations under IHL and international human rights on implementing law, the treaties under those bodies of law and on bringing domestic legislation in line with the obligations resulting spread knowledgeTo of IHL and promote broader international cooperation respect ensuring on for IHL and human rights law

Mandate • • , Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Defence, 1

, National Commission on the Composition Representatives: Justice, Industry Labour and Trade, and Social Protection, Security, Health, Economy and Environmental Budgetary Interior, Planning, Education Information, and Culture Protection, and Science, General Prosecutor’s Office and National Security Committee, Commission on Human Rights under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan (by agreement) National Centre on Human Rights (by agreement) Issues of Women and Family Demographic Policy (by agreement) secretariat: and Chairmanship Foreign Affairs

1251 of 1251 of 1251

December 2003 December 2003

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Resolution No. 9 Operation: Internal regulations approved by Government Resolution No. 9 Established: 2003 basis:Legal Government

(Secretary) +  committee

Fax: 327 +3172 567 of 010000 Republic of Kazakhstan Tel.: 7172 720326 Name and address Interdepartmental Commission on andInternational Law the International Human Rights Treaties c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs 35, st. No.1, Centr Adminitsrativniy Astana, Country Kazakhstan ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 177 To promoteTo respect for IHL by implementing and disseminating it coordinateTo and monitor implementation of IHL in Kenya adviseTo the government on IHL instruments that need to be ratified existing legislation review recommend and To amendments necessary where recommendTo new legislation where applicable advise administrative on measuresTo required coordinate,To monitor and evaluate dissemination undertakeTo or commission research on IHL the to appropriate recommendations make and government monitorTo and coordinate the dissemination and implementation IHL of adviseTo on matters related to the ratification of IHL treaties review domesticTo legislation and propose measures to implement the rules of IHL promoteTo IHL in educational institutions and the armed amongst forces, public and general the cooperateTo and exchange information with the national committees of other countries, and with ICRCthe international other organizations and

Mandate • • • • • • • • • • • • • Ministry of 69 2008;

7608)

Foreign Affairs, Defence, Foreign Affairs, National , Vol. CX-No. 1

State Law Office Kenyan Gazette Representatives: Internal Security and Provincial Administration, Home Affairs, Medical Services, Information Education, Communications, and Commissioner of Police, Commissioner of Prisons, Regional Delegation of the ICRC, Kenyan Medical Association, University of Nairobi and the ( Composition Government Notice No. Secretariat: Representatives: Defence, Justice, Education and Human Properties Administration, Cultural Resources, scholars and the secretariat: and Chairmanship Foreign Affairs and Trade

October 2002

42 of the Ministry 15602

August 2008.

October 2001

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 5 The National Committee was on reconstituted 22 Membership is designated by institutions, not by the individual of names appointees No. Operation: Decision No. of Foreign Affairs and Trade,17 Established: 2001 basis:Legal Memorandum of the Attorney-General, Established: 2002 basis:Legal decree Presidential committee

of Name and address National Committee Implementation the for of International Law Humanitarian c/o Solicitor-General State Law Office Attorney-General’s Chamber Box 40112 P.O. 00100 Nairobi Kenya +254Tel.: 20227605 Fax: +254 20214343 Korean NationalKorean Committee for International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Treaties Bureau) 77 Sejongro Chongrogu Seoul (110-760) Republic of Korea +822Tel.: 720 92 13 Fax: +822 725 07 67 Country Kenya Korea (Republic of) 178 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To look intoTo and assist in bringing domestic legislation in line with obligations under the Geneva Conventions Additional their and Protocols as well as other IHL instruments coordinateTo the activities of State bodies involved in the implementation of IHL proposals recommendations, and provide To advice for implementing IHL at the national level draw up a planTo for organizing training and dissemination programmes in IHL assistTo in bringing domestic legislation in line IHLwith treaties; assessTo the degree to which domestic legislation is in compliance with IHL norms suggestTo ways of improving the implementation of IHL draw up briefsTo and position papers on draft pertaininginternational laws treaties national and to of IHL coordinateTo the activities of State bodies involved in the implementation of IHL promoteTo the dissemination of IHL and gather information developments on IHL in monitorTo the implementation of its own decisions facilitateTo interaction and exchange of information with the ICRC and other international organizations active in the area of IHL

Mandate • • • • • • • • • • • • Ministry of Justice, Foreign Assistant Under-Secretary Foreign Affairs, Defence, 1

Composition Membership: Justice, Interior, and Information, Faculty of Law of Kuwait University and the Kuwait Red Crescent Chairmanship: Legal Affairsfor International and Relations, Justice of Ministry Representatives: Affairs, Health, Interior, Environment and Education,Emergencies, Defence, Science and Culture and Information, Social Fund, State National Security Committee, Border Service, the ICRC and the Kyrgyz Red Crescent secretariat: and Chairmanship Justice

361 of June

October

361 of 18

June 2003

October 2006

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 9 No. 2003. The changes in the composition of the committee were introduced by Order of the MinistryNo.194 of Justice, 21 2008. Operation: Regulations attached to Resolution No. 18 Established: 2006 basis:Legal Ministerial Decree of the Ministry of Justice, Established: 2003 basis:Legal Government Resolution

committee

of Name and address National Commission Commission National for International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Justice Department of International Cooperation Box 6 Safat 13001 P.O. Kuwait Interdepartmental Committee on the Implementation of International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Justice Makhamad Gandi, 32 Bishkek 720040 Kyrgyzstan +996Tel.: 65 65 312 01 (Secretary) Fax: +996 66 30 312 40/44 Web: http://minjust.gov. kg/?page_id=205 Country Kuwait Kyrgyzstan ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 179 To follow up anTo implementation plan to incorporate IHL in national legislation by: drafting the necessary provisions and measures to adapt national legislation drawing up an annual plan of action for the appropriate dissemination IHL of coordinating between stakeholders the all involved in dissemination and implementation of IHL exchanging information and expertise to and regional strengthen national, the on relations international levels monitoring and documenting IHL violations at the domestic level in proposals recommendations and providing connection with plan national the reporting annually to the Prime Minister adviseTo the government on matters related to ratification of or accession to IHL treaties set up educationalTo and training programmes as a means of spreading knowledge of IHL prepareTo studies on IHL-related issues identify,To develop, and adopt measures for the implementation IHL of monitorTo the implementation of IHL

Mandate • • • • • • • • • • • • • Justice, Foreign Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defence Deputy Prime Minister Principal Secretary at the 1

Attached General the to Secretariat: Secretariat of the Prime Minister’s Office Representatives: and Immigrants, Interior and Municipalities, NationalFinance, Education Higher Defence, and Culture, the Parliamentary Commission for Human Rights, Bar Associations in Beirut and the Tripoli, Lebanese Order of Physicians in Beirut and the Tripoli, , othersand Chairmanship: Representatives: and National Security, Justice, Law and Constitutional Affairs, Home Affairs, Health and Social Welfare, Education and Training, NationalTourism, University of Lesotho and Cross Red Lesotho the Chairmanship: Ministry of Defence and National Security Composition .

June

March

This is 4382 of 21

ad hoc committee Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 2010 was signed in Negotiations2001. are under way to give the committee formal legal a status. Cabinet approval for requested been has tabled be legislation to before Parliament. Established: 2010 basis:Legal Presidential Decree Established: 2001 basis:Legal an A memorandum of understanding the for concerned entities committee

of Name and address Lebanese National International Law Humanitarian Committee c/o Office of the Prime Minister Riad El-Solh Square Beirut Lebanon Lesotho NationalLesotho International for Committee Law Humanitarian c/o M. Sehloho Mr. Principal Secretary National the of Chair Committee on IHL Ministry of Defence & National Security Private Bag A 116 Maseru, 100 Lesotho +266Tel.: 570 22 316 Fax: +26622 518 310 Country Lebanon Lesotho 180 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To promoteTo the ratification of and adherence IHLto national of amendment treaties, the and legislation to comply with these treaties, and to contribute to the dissemination of IHL draw up advisoryTo opinions on the Republic’s position on problems of IHL, draft treaties, and national implementation legislation examine proposalsTo and coordinate activities of bodies concerned with the implementation of IHL law monitorTo the application of rules of IHL at the level;national cooperateTo and exchange information with ICRCthe international other organizations and involved in implementation of IHL

Mandate • • • • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1

Law Reform Commission Ministry of Justice and Law Reform Commission Secretariat: Representatives: Finance, Education, Information, Justice, National Police, Law Reform Commission, Governance IndependentCommission, National Commission on Human Rights, Liberia National Commission on Small Arms, Foundation for Democracy in Liberia , Consortium of Civil Society Organizations of Liberia, Liberia Red Cross Society and ICRC (observer) Chairmanship: Composition

decision September

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Justice in 2012 Established: 2013 basis:Legal of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and

 00231880369812 00231888301661 committee

of Tel.: Name and address Liberia International International Liberia Law Humanitarian Committee Atty Joseph Cheeseman Head of the Secretariat Law Reform Commission Point Mamba Monrovia Liberia Email: josephecheeseman80 @yahoo.com Country Liberia ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 181 To developTo strategies, plans and programmes for IHLimplementing studyTo IHL conventions and prepare draft these implement legislation conventions to design andTo implement training programmes on IHL international and regional national, organize To seminars and events on IHL and its domestic implementation coordinateTo the activities of national bodies concerned with implementing IHL monitorTo violations of IHL and propose remedial measures enact measuresTo to promote and disseminate IHL act as anTo advisory body of the Ministry of National Defence coordinateTo the domestic implementation of IHL draw up IHL-related trainingTo programmes make proposalsTo for enactment or amendment domesticof legislation

Mandate • • • • • • • • • • •

Foreign Affairs, National Secretariat General the of Secretary General the of 1

Representatives: Defence, Justice, Interior, Culture, Health, Health, Culture, Interior, Justice, Defence, European Law, Justice, armed forces, and the Lithuanian Red Cross Society secretariat: and Chairmanship Ministry of National Defence Composition Representatives: People’s Committee for Justice, Defence, External Communication International and Cooperation, Public Security, Health Care, Higher Education, Culture, National Centre for charitableEducational foundations, Planning, Bar Association, IHL experts, and the Libyan Crescent Red Chairmanship: People’s Committee for Justice

Decree August

253 of the General

December 2005

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. Popular Committee, 18 Defence, 30 2001. Established: 2001 basis:Legal Amendment the to regulations the of Ministry of National Defence, 22 May 2001; and ordinance of the Ministry of National Established: 2005 basis:Legal ) g. 25/3 g. committee

Agnė Bernardišiūtė LT-01121 Vilnius LT-01121 Lithuania +370Tel.: 5 2735 635 ( of Totorių Name and address Fax: +370 967 5 2126 National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Justice Tripoli Libya Commission on Implementation the of International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of National Defence Country Libya Lithuania 182 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To evaluate existingTo national law in connection IHL under treaties obligations Macedonia’s with make recommendationsTo for further implementation of IHL and to promote activities IHL disseminating for

Mandate • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry of Justice 1

Macedonian Red Cross (as of July 2011) Secretariat: Representatives: Culture, Science, and Education Justice, Health, General Secretariat Government the of and the Macedonian Red Cross (other on represented scholars and ministries an ad hoc basis) Chairmanship: Composition

June

Decision Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Government, 7 2006 Established: 2006 basis:Legal of the Secretary- General the of 13 Bul. Koco13 Racin

committee

of No. Skopje 1000 Email: volonter@ redcross.org.mk Name and address National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Dame Gruev 1000 Skopje 6 Macedonia c/o Makedonski crven krst (Macedonian Red Cross) Country Macedonia (former Yugoslav of)Republic ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 183 To coordinateTo and follow up steps for the domestic implementation IHL of treaties evaluate existingTo domestic law and other domestic measures of implementation and advise the government on implementing and developing IHL ensure theTo dissemination of IHL within the country reportTo to the government and to the prime minister on the activities of the committee

Mandate • • • • Foreign Affairs, Justice, Ministry of Justice of Ministry 1

Composition Representatives: Interior and Administrative Reform, National Defence, Health and Family Planning, State Secretariat for Public Security, civil society, and the Malagasy Red Cross Chairmanship:

June 2006

ministerial ministerial - , 27 2006-435 on 5255/2008 of the

February 2008 Inter

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. the establishment of an Committee for the Red Cross Operation: Internal Regulations No. National Committee Internationalon Humanitarian Law, 29 Established: 2006 basis:Legal Governmental Decree committee

of Name and address Commission Nationale Nationale Commission Du International Droit (CONADIH)Humanitaire c/o Mrs Liliane Arivony Rasendra Président de la commission nationale international droit du humanitaire (CONADIH) Magistrat chef de service des relations extérieures (101) Tananarive Faravotriha Madagascar +261Tel.: 20 22 233 65 Email: rarivony@yahoo. co.uk Country Madagascar 184 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To adviseTo the government on legislation to implement IHL, which includes the adoption of measures to punish war criminals and to ensure respect for the emblem and protection for civilians during armed conflict help spreadTo knowledge of IHL overseeTo the implementation of IHL in Malawi overseeTo implementation of IHL and educate the public on their rights and obligations in times of war take theTo steps necessary to ensure that Malaysian legislation is in conformity with Malaysia’s obligations under IHL, especially the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the Malaysian Geneva Conventions Act of 1962 assessTo the abilities of various government agencies to implement IHL during armed conflict

Mandate • • • • • •

Foreign Affairs, Defence, Foreign Affairs, Defence, 1

Representatives: Rights Human judiciary, Interior, Justice, Commission and the Malawi Red Cross Society Representatives: Home Affairs, Attorney-General’s Chambers, Information, Women and Family Development, Unity, Culture, Arts and Heritage, police and forces armed secretariat: and Chairmanship Human Rights and Social Division within the AffairsMultilateral Department Composition

August

Cabinet March March December

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Established: concerned, 2000 decision of 2007 2000 basis:Legal Memorandum of understanding among the ministries Established: December 2007 basis:Legal ) -

committee

Jawatankuasa UndangJawatankuasa of undang Kemanusiaan Malaysia Antarabangsa JUKAM c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs JalanN° Wisma 1, Putra 62601 Putrajaya Malaysia Name and address Malawi National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Major General RRK Chimowa Ministry of Defence Private Bag 339 Lilongwe 3 Malawi +265Tel.: 1 788 920 Mobile phone: 368/820 +2658872 2258 Email: rhchimowa@ yahoo.co.uk Malaysian National IHL Committee ( Country Malawi Malaysia ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 185 To adviseTo and assist the government in implementing and spreading knowledge of IHL adviseTo on any new legislation or changes to existing legislation ensure effectiveTo implementation of IHL To serveTo as a consultative body to the government matters IHL-related on promote and IHL disseminate To evaluate domesticTo law and prepare recommendations pertinent the for authorities

Mandate • • • • • •

Prime Minister, Foreign Prime Minister, Foreign Affairs, Defence, Rotating presidency 1

Ministry Foreign of Affairs Representatives: Affairs, Public Prosecutor’s Office, Finance, Social Security, Education, Culture, Health, and the Mauritius Red Cross Society secretariat: and Chairmanship Prime Minister’s Office Composition Representatives: Interior and Navy Chairmanship: Secretariat:

October

Cabinet December

August 2009

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal decision of 10 2001 (memorandum of the Prime Minister’s Office11 of 2001) 12 Established: 2009 basis:Legal Presidential Decree of Established: 2001 basis:Legal M - committee

of CIDIH c/o Ministry of Foreign éxico Affairs Plaza Juárez 20, Piso 6 Col. Centro, Del. Cuauhtémoc C.P. 0 6 010 México City, D.F. México Name and address National Humanitarian Humanitarian National CommitteeLaw of Mauritius c/o Mrs Kan Oye Fong PoorunWeng Senior Chief Executive,President the of National Humanitarian Law Mauritius Committee of Prime Minister’s Office Level Government 4, Centre Port-Louis Mauritius +230Tel.: 201 1366 Fax: +230 9272 211 Email: kofong@mail. gov.mu Comisión Intersecretarial Intersecretarial Comisión Internacional Derecho de Humanitario Country Mauritius Mexico 186 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To review domesticTo legislation in the light of IHL treaties make recommendationsTo to the government on the domestic implementation of IHL and monitor their application coordinateTo the activities of governmental concerned bodies spread knowledgeTo of IHL adviseTo the government on all issues related to dissemination and promotion implementation, the of IHL at the national level

Mandate • • • • • Conseil Consultatif ), scholars, NGOs and Foreign Affairs, Defence, Government and official Ministry of Justice of Ministry 1

Ministry Foreign of Affairs Ministry of Justice of Ministry Secretariat: Representatives: Security, National Education, Interior, Justice, Health, Labour, Civil Defence, police and the Moldovan Red Cross Chairmanship: Composition Representatives: institutions concerned with IHL, the Advisory Council on Human Rights ( des de l’Homme Droits the Moroccan Red Crescent Chairmanship: Prime Minister Secretariat:

asmiya April

Decree 382-P

R

- 121-P of 121-P

September 1996 259 of 1

October 1998 J

- Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Decrees No. of 9 and No. 21 Operation: Government Order No. (internal1999 regulations) Al arida Al Established: 1996 basis:Legal Governmental Established: 9 July 2008 basis:Legal July of 10 2.07.231 2008, published in issue 5646 of the official gazette, committee

of Name and address National Committee Consultation on Coordination and Implementation of of International Law Humanitarian 31 August, 82 Chisinau2012 Republic of Moldova +373Tel.: 2 234351 Fax: +373 2 232527 Moroccan National National Moroccan Commission for International Law Humanitarian c/o Office of the Prime Minister Mechouar Rabat Kingdom Morocco of Country Moldova (Republic of) Morocco ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 187 To provideTo advice, take initiatives and submit draft documents to the parliament and government of Mongolia on IHL issues developTo a national action plan for implementing IHL and submit it to the pertinent authorities for approval carryTo out research and provide recommendations for acceding to multilateral treaties on IHL carryTo out research and provide recommendations for bringing existing domestic legislation into line with IHL promoteTo and disseminate IHL throughout the country carryTo out research and analyse domestic and international trends associated with IHL and its implementation adviseTo the government on issues related to human rights and IHL

Mandate • • • • • • • Foreign Affairs and Foreign Affairs, Defence, Deputy Prime Minister Ministry of Justice of Ministry 1

Mongolian Red Cross Secretariat: Representatives: Law, Defence,Trade Education, Science and Technology, Finance, Health, Human Rights National Commission, Emergency National InstituteManagement Agency, of Law, National University Law School, and the Mongolian Red Cross Chairmanship: Composition Representatives: Justice, Home Affairs and Immigration, Land, Health, Gender, Office of the Prime Minister, Safety and Security, University of Namibia, Legal Assistance Centre, Ombudsman and the Namibia Red Cross Chairmanship:

Decree Decision 145 of 20145 May

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 2009 Established: 20 May 2009 basis:Legal Established: 1995 basis:Legal of the Council of Ministers committee

of Name and address National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Mr Battumur Chimeddorj Director, Law and Treaty Department Ministry Foreign of Affairs and Trade Peace Avenue 7A Ulaanbaatar 14210 Mongolia Interministerial Technical Interministerial Committee on Human Humanitarian and Rights Law c/o Mr IVJ Ndjoze Deputy Permanent Secretary Justice of Ministry Private Bag 13302 Windhoek Namibia +264Tel.: 61 280 5319 Fax: +264 61 254 2054 Country Mongolia Namibia 188 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To developTo the legislation required to implement IHL treaties to which Nepal is party and to review existing law conductTo promotional activities for the dissemination IHL of treaties various at levels, including all activities related to domestic implementation adviseTo whether Nepal should accede to other IHL instruments and on the measures to be taken in this regard adviseTo the government on ways in which it can meet its treaty obligations with regard to disseminating IHL encourageTo and coordinate dissemination programmes, in particular through the government and the , but also through such channels as universities, the general the and medical churches profession, public reportTo periodically to the government on the content, adequacy dissemination relevance and of programmes

Mandate • • • • • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, Foreign Affairs, Defence, Minister for Law and Justice Independent expert 1

Ministry of Law and Justice New Zealand Red Cross Composition Representatives: Law and Justice, Home Affairs, Health, Education, Culture, Women, Children and Social Welfare, Office of the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers Chairmanship: Secretariat: (The head of the International Law and Treaty Division the Member is Secretary) Representatives: Justice, Education, armed forces, scholars, judiciary, police, medical experts and the New Zealand Red Cross Chairmanship: Secretariat:

Decision

February 2007

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 26 Established: 2007 basis:Legal of the Cabinet of the Government of Nepal, Established: 1980 basis:Legal Internal decision of the Executive Justice

committee

of and Singha Durbar Kathmandu Nepal +977-1-4211702 Tel.: Fax: +977-1-4211684 Name and address National Committee Implementation the for of International Law Humanitarian c/o Mr Dilli Raj Ghimire SecretaryJoint Ministry of Law New Zealand International Law Humanitarian Committee c/o New Zealand Red Cross 69 Molesworth St. Thorndon Box 12-140 P.O. 6038 Wellington Zealand New +64Tel.: 3750 4 472 Fax: +64 4 473 0315 Country Nepal New ZealandNew ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 189 To adviseTo and provide support to the government on all issues related to participation in IHL treaties, to incorporation of the provisions of these treaties in domestic and law, to the dissemination theseof provisions serveTo as an important point of contact in relation to the adoption and domestic implementation of IHL treaties and to support the tasks these in authorities national submit advisoryTo opinions to national authorities assistTo the government in implementing and disseminating IHL evaluate existingTo domestic law and make recommendations for further implementation

Mandate • • • • • The work of the committee is part of the broader task of promoting respect for IHL and human rights. The committee also serves as a vehicle for building public confidence and trust in the legal process. Solicitor- Foreign Affairs, Justice, Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry Foreign of Affairs 1

Representatives: Office, President’s Health, Education, commissions of the National Assembly, Supreme Court, scholars and the Chairmanship: Composition Representatives: Justice, Interior, Finance, Culture Tourism, Education, Health, Orientation, National and AffairsWomen’s & Social Development, Defence Headquarters, National Human Rights Commission, National Commission for Refugees, Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, scholars, and secretary-generalthe Nigerian the Red of Cross secretariat: and Chairmanship General Federation the of Permanent and Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Justice

April

54-99 of 23

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 1999 Established: 1999 basis:Legal Presidential Decree Established: 2010 basis:Legal Inaugurated by the Attorney-General the of Federation and Minister of Justice on 23 July 2010 committee

of Name and address Comisión Nacional Nacional Comisión la Aplicaciónpara del Internacional Derecho (CONADIH)Humanitario Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores Dirección General de Asuntos Jurídicos Soberanía Territorio y Del Cine González 1 cuadra al Sur sobre Avenida Bolívar Managua Nicaragua 505-2448055 Tel./Fax: National International International National Law Humanitarian Committee c/o Federal Ministry Justice of Plot 71 B Shehu Shagari Way Matiama P.M.B 192 Ciarki Abuja Nigeria Country Nicaragua Nigeria 190 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To implementTo IHL and advise the authorities on its interpretation and applicability serveTo as a forum for discussing IHL prepareTo a list of domestic laws for implementing IHL propose and draft recommendations make To laws to the executive branch of government for IHLimplementing disseminateTo IHL in State institutions and amongst public general the cooperateTo with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in organizing meetings with the ICRC promoteTo the incorporation of IHL in school and university curricula and to cooperate in developing these curricula in this regard international conferences in represent Panama To issues IHL-related on meetings and

Mandate • • • • • • • •

Foreign Affairs, Justice, Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry Foreign of Affairs 1

Representatives: Interior, Education, Labour, Police, Civil Office, Legislative President’s Defence, Assembly, scholars, and the Panama Red Cross secretariat: and Chairmanship Ministry Foreign of Affairs Composition Representatives: Justice, armed forces, Public Prosecutor’s Office, and the Chairmanship:

Executive Executive Resolutions Resolutions 154 of 154 of165

001-98 and 001-00 (internal

August 1997, August 1997, August 1999 September 1989

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 15 Decree No. 25 amended by Executive Decree No. 19 Operation: No. No. regulations) Established: 1989 basis:Legal Royal Decree of Established: 1997 basis:Legal committee

of Name and address National Committee on Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Box 8114 P.O. 0032 Oslo Norway +47Tel.: 22 36 24 00 Fax: +47 22 95 24 80 Comisión Nacional Nacional Comisión para Permanente la Aplicación del Internacional Derecho (CPDIH)Humanitario c/o Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores Altos del Cerro Ancón Edificio 95 Ciudad de Panamà Panama +507Tel.: 4296 211 Fax: +507 4296 211 Country Norway Panama ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 191 To consultTo with the public and private institutions concerned and make recommendations to the authorities on implementing, applying and disseminating IHL carryTo out studies and make recommendations on implementing IHL contributeTo to monitoring the implementation of IHL help spreadTo knowledge of IHL

Mandate • • • • Ministry of

Foreign Affairs, Defence, Foreign Affairs, Defence, 1

Representatives: Justice, Interior, Education (Parliament, Ombudsman, human rights NGOs and the ICRC act as observers) secretariat: and Chairmanship Justice Composition Representatives: Justice, Interior, Employment and the Paraguayan Red Cross secretariat: and Chairmanship Ministry of Defence

April

June 240-

234- 062-

15926 of

8802 May of 12

December 2001

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 1995; reorganization Presidential by Decree No. 28 Suprema) No. 2001-JUS of 1 2001; amended by (ResoluciónResolution Suprema) No. 2008-JUS of 23 2008 Operation: Ministerial Resolution No. 2001-JUS of 23 July 2001 (regulations workingregarding procedures) Established: 1995 basis:Legal Presidential Decree Established: 2001 basis:Legal (ResoluciónResolution (CONADIH) committee

of Name and address Comisión Interministerial Interministerial Comisión de Aplicación del Internacional Derecho Humanitario c/o Ministerio de Defensa Nacional Avda. Mariscal López y Vicepresidente Sánchez Asunción Paraguay Comisíon Nacional de Estudio y Aplicación del Internacional Derecho Humanitario c/o Ministerio de Justicia Scipión Llona 350 Miraflores Lima Peru Fax: 441 05 +511 4 Country Paraguay Peru 192 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To act as anTo advisory body on IHL, especially with respect to the promotion of this body of law, the development dissemination of strategies, the networking, campaign, emblem provision the and of assistance to victims of war promoteTo norms of IHL and introduce them into the Polish legal system analyseTo international agreements on IHL and put forward proposals implement legislation for to them adviseTo the prime minister on legislative and IHL to related activities educational assess prepared, being legislation analyse To government programmes relevant review and documents prepareTo educational projects on IHL maintainTo ties with other committees in Poland and abroad concerned with IHL formulateTo Poland’s position at international conferences on the basis of proposals made by the minister in charge

Mandate • • • • • • • •

Prime Minister’s Office Foreign Affairs, Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry Foreign of Affairs 1

Appointed by the Chairman Vice-Chairmanship: Secretariat: Representatives: Defence, Justice, Interior, Education, armed forces, police, Commission on Human Rights, Philippine Society on International Humanitarian Law, Philippine Campaign to Ban Landmines, Philippine Coalition to Stop the Use of Children as Soldiers, scholars, legal experts and the secretariat: and Chairmanship Philippine Red Cross Representatives: Justice, Internal Affairs and Administration, Finance, Culture and National Heritage, Science, Health, National Education, and the Prime Minister’s Office Chairmanship: Composition

51 of 51

Decision

April 2000

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 26 Operation: Internal regulations Regulation No. 20 May 2004 issued by the Prime Minister Established: 2000 basis:Legal of the Philippine National Red Cross upon approval by its Board of Governors on Established: 2004 basis:Legal committee

of Name and address Philippine NationalPhilippine Red Cross (PNRC) International Law Humanitarian National Committee c/o The Philippine Red Cross Bonifacio Drive, Port Area Box 280 P.O. 2803 Manila Philippines Fax: +63 2 257 08 57 Commission for International Affairs Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Legal and Treaty Department Al. J. ch. Szucha 23. 00-580 Warsaw Poland +48Tel.: 225239424 225238329 +48 Fax: Country Philippines Poland ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 193 To create, in closeTo cooperation with the executive board of the , programmes for disseminating IHL (e.g. Exploring Humanitarian Law, an educational programme for middle school and high school teachers) participateTo (e.g. individual members of the commission may give lectures) in training activities establishTo prizes for bachelor’s and master’s theses, doctoral and dissertations, with dealing IHL issues and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement provideTo support for the international efforts of the executive board of the Polish Red Cross (developing and editing documents for the meetings with the ICRC, participating in international conferences symposia and etc.) issue publicationsTo on IHL-related matters cooperateTo with State institutions, components of the Movement – particularly the ICRC – UNHCR, the Institute of Humanitarian Law in San Amnesty Remo, International other and organizations

Mandate • • • • • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, Dr Marcin Marcinko, 1

Composition Representatives: Interior, Health, Culture and Education, National Fire Service, scholars (University of Warsaw, Jagiellonian University, University of Wrocław, University of Silesia, National Defence Academy, etc.), and employees and volunteers of the Polish Red Cross. Experts and third parties interested in the dissemination of IHL may be invited to the meetings. commission’s Chairmanship: professor at the Jagiellonian University and a Regional Poland Lesser the of representative Branch of the Polish Red Cross The Commission meets at least twice a year. Between meetings, its members remain in constant contact with the executive board of the Polish Red Cross and amongst themselves.

August 2005

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Cross, 23 Established: 2005 basis:Legal Resolution 446/2005 of the executive board of the Polish Red committee

of Name and address Commission for Disseminationthe of International Law Humanitarian Country Poland (continued) 194 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To fosterTo cooperation and exchange of information expertiseand international and with regional federations,commissions, associations and IHL with concerned organizations proposeTo the signature accession of, to, or ratification pertinentof international conventions and treaties proposeTo agreements or protocols with similar commissions bodies and submit proposalsTo for bringing domestic legislation into line with IHL provideTo advisory opinions on IHL-related concerned authorities the matters to submit proposalsTo and studies necessary for implementing IHL domestically draw up, in coordinationTo with competent authorities, an annual plan for disseminating IHL developTo plans and training programmes, organize seminars and meetings, publish newsletters periodicals and disseminate, to implement and raise awareness of IHL collectTo data and statistics on State contributions IHL related to performTo any other tasks assigned by the Council of Ministers

Mandate • • • • • • • • • • Defence, Interior, Foreign 1

Representatives: Affairs, Justice, Labour, the Higher Council for Education, the Higher Council for Health, the Shura (Consultative) Council, University of Qatar, The Qatari Institution for Combating Trafficking in Persons, and the Qatari Red Crescent Presidency: The Deputy Minister of Justice Composition

Prime 27 of 2012 on27 the of 2012

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. Establishment of the National Commission Internationalfor Humanitarian Law (issued by the Emir’s office on 8 May 2012) Established: 2012 basis:Legal Decree Minister’s committee

of Name and address National Commission Commission National for International Law Humanitarian Qatari Ministry of Justice Doha Box 917 P.O. Qatar Country Qatar ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 195 To promoteTo the ratification of and accession to IHL treaties and the amendment of domestic treaties these with comply to legislation analyseTo domestic legislation and to advise the government on measures to implement and apply IHL at the national level contributeTo to the dissemination of IHL in educational institutions and the armed forces and amongst public general the teach andTo popularize IHL and to monitor its dissemination implementation and raise awarenessTo of IHL

Mandate • • • • • CEO, Foreign Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defence, Mr Mose Mr Iono Bouvisua Rotating the among 1

Representatives: and Trade, Policeand Trade, and Prisons, Office of the Attorney-General, Samoa Society Civil for Liberties, and the Samoan Red Cross Chairmanship: Chief Executive Officer Executive Chief Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade Composition Representatives: Justice, Home Affairs and Administration Reform, Public Health, Education, Research Youth and Chairmanship: participating ministries participating

Decision Cabinet September

March 2006 April 2006)

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 29 (published in the Official Gazette of 13 decision of 2007 Established: 2006 basis:Legal of the Government, Established: 2007 basis:Legal committee

of Name and address National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Aleea Modrogan 14 nr. Bucharest Romania National International International National Law Humanitarian Committee c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs PO Box L1859 Apia Samoa Tel.: +685 21171 Country Romania Samoa 196 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To raise awarenessTo of IHL follow up developmentsTo in IHL and study issues related to the adoption of new treaties and other instruments of IHL proposeTo measures for implementing treaties and other IHL instruments to relevant State bodies When necessary, to provide relevant State bodies advisory opinions on fulfilling obligations contained international treaties other and in instruments of IHL considerTo and propose measures for disseminating IHL throughout the country proposeTo measures for carrying out training in IHL in pertinent bodies and institutions considerTo issues related to cooperation with other national IHL committees, the ICRC and international organizations and national other dealing with IHL, and to exchange experiences in IHLimplementing

Mandate • • • • • • • Defence and Aviation, Defence (Ms Bojana Saudi Red Crescent Mr Bozin Nikolic, Ministry of 1

Representatives: Interior, Foreign Affairs, Justice, Higher Education, Culture and Information, Economy and Planning, Education, Human Rights Committee within the Consultative Council, and the Saudi Red Crescent. Chairmanship: Composition Representatives: Nikolic); Justice (Mr Milisav Coguric); Interior (Mr Goran Markovic); Health (Ms Katarina Torbica); Labour and Social Affairs (Mr. Vukota Vlahovic); Education (Ms Jelica Ristic- Cirovic); International Law Association (Ms Dina Dobrkovic) and theRed Cross of Serbia Chairmanship: Foreign Affairs

April

Decree

144 of144 the Council 30, 7 May 2010

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. of Ministers, May 14 2007 (27-04-1428 Hegira) adopted on 29 and2010, published in the Official Gazette, No. Established: 2007 basis:Legal Established: 2010 basis:Legal Government decision to set up the committee,

committee

of Name and address National Commission Commission National on International Law Humanitarian Saudi Red Crescent Authority, International Humanitarian Law Committee Box 11129 P.O. Riyadh 11424 Saudi Arabia +966Tel.: 1489 2555 National Commission Internationalon Humanitarian Law Mr Bozin Nikolic Director of the Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Ministry Foreign of Affairs of the Republic Serbiaof Kneza Miloša 24-26 Belgrade 11000 Serbia Email: Bozin.nikolic@ mfa.rs Country Saudi Arabia Serbia ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 197 To review domesticTo legislation and propose measures for implementing IHL and human rights law monitorTo and coordinate the application of IHL and human rights law promoteTo and disseminate IHL and human rights country the law throughout take partTo in drafting reports to United Nations bodies treaty monitoring

Mandate • • • • Foreign Affairs, Public Ministry Foreign of Affairs 1

Composition Representatives: Office, Education, Health, Prosecutor’s Defence, Social Affairs, Community Development and Sports, police, Ombudsman, National Assembly, Bar Association, National Human Rights Commission, Attorney- General’s Office, judiciary, National Council Seychelles Media Children, for Commission, Gender Secretariat, University of Seychelles, National Youth Council, the Liaison Unit of Non-Governmental Organizations, Seychelles and the Seychelles Red Cross Chairmanship:

Decision Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Established: 2001 basis:Legal of the Council of Ministers, 23 May 2001 committee

of Name and address National Humanitarian Humanitarian National Affairs Committee c/o Mr Joseph Francois of Director-General Protocol, Treaties and Consular Affairs Ministry Foreign of Affairs Maison Queau de Quinssy Mont Fleuri Victoria Republic of Seychelles Country Seychelles 198 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

hoc

ad To recommend and promote the accession the promote and recommend To to or ratification of IHL treaties and their implementation promote,To develop and provide support for the dissemination of IHL in State institutions evaluate domesticTo implementation of IHL make recommendationsTo for establishing promoteTo cooperation between the government international organizationsand strengthening for IHL for respect promoteTo measures that will contribute to ensuring respect for and applying IHL serveTo as an advisory body to the government prepareTo draft regulations and instructions for IHLimplementing develop, promoteTo and coordinate a national plan of action for ensuring the promotion and application of IHL exchange informationTo and experience with other bodies concerned with IHL draw up andTo present initial reports on the implementation IHL of carryTo out any other task related to the object of the committee working groups in connection with adopting the necessary implementation measures

Mandate • • • • • • • • • • • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, 1

Composition Representatives: Justice, Education, Health and Sanitation, Sanitation, and Health Education, Justice, Small Arms Secretariat, Prison Service, Police Legal Department, Sierra Leone Institute of International Law, Civil Society Movement, Forum,Women’s Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone, Office of National Security, Special Court Sierra for International Leone, Organization for Migration, and the Sierra Leone Red Cross.

April 2012.

October, 2011. The October, 2011.

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 12 National Committee has conducted five meetings and one extraordinary meeting since its inauguration Januaryon 12 2012. It was officially launched at State Hall of the Sierra Leone Parliament by the Attorney-General and the Minister of Justice on 30 Established: 2011 (official launch 2012) basis:Legal Approved by Cabinet Meeting 23 held on committee

of Name and address National Committee Implementation the for of International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs International and Cooperation StreetGloucester Freetown Sierra Leone Country Sierra Leone Sierra ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 199 To assessTo both the implementation of IHL in domestic law and its application by domestic authorities courts administrative and proposeTo – to the pertinent authorities – measures effective ensure to implementation of IHL proposeTo Slovakia’s participation in other IHL treaties help spreadTo knowledge of IHL in schools, the armed forces, and the police cooperateTo with the national committees of other countries and with international organizations

Mandate • • • • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry Foreign of Affairs 1

Slovak Red Cross Secretariat: Representatives: Culture, Education, Health, Interior, Justice, armed forces, Ombudsman and the Slovak Red Cross. Chairmanship: Composition

Decision September 2001

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 20 (statutes of the Committee); entered into force on 1 January 2002 Established: 2001 basis:Legal of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, committee

of Name and address Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Slovak Red Cross Grösslingova 24 81446 Bratislava Slovakia +421Tel.: 2 52925305 Fax: +421 2 52923279 c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Head of the Public International Law Division International Law Department Hlboka cesta 2 833 36 Bratislava Slovakia Web: http://www. foreign.gov.sk/sk/ zahranicna__politika/ medzinarodne_ pravo-vybor_pre_ medzinarodne_ humanitarne_pravo Country Slovakia 200 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To act as a focalTo point and to provide leadership on all matters related to the domestic implementation dissemination and IHL of

Mandate • International Relations and Department International of 1

Composition Representatives: Cooperation, Justice, Defence, Home Affairs, Health, Arts and Culture, police, and co-opted members from outside the government (the South African Red Cross Society, the ICRC, etc.) Chairmanship: Relations and Cooperation

Decision April 2006

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Affairs, Established: 2006 basis:Legal of the Executive Management Committee of the Department Foreign of committee

of Name and address National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Mr Pitso Montwedi Chief Director, Human Humanitarian Rights and Affairs Department of International Relations Cooperationand 460 Soutpansberg Road Rietondale Pretoria, 0001 AfricaSouth 351 1000 012 Tel.: Email: MontwediP@ dirco.gov.za Country South Africa ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 201 To promoteTo the ratification of IHL treaties strengthenTo respect for and application of IHL by advising government authorities on the drafting of new laws adviseTo government authorities on the dissemination of IHL and on training programmes for the armed forces, security personnel and civil servants act as a consultantTo to the government in all matters pertaining to IHL and to evaluate progress in this area prepareTo Spain’s positions and commitments at the International Conferences of the Red Cross and Red Crescent act as a permanentTo link with the ICRC promoteTo the application of IHL in other States To examine issuesTo related to the domestic implementation IHL of promoteTo accession to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

Mandate • • • • • • • • • Ministry of Foreign Affairs and External Affairs, Defence, Mr Thusantha Wijemanna, 1

Ministry External of Affairs Composition Representatives: Representatives: Cooperation, Defence, Justice, Interior, Economy, Education and Science, Labour and Social Affairs, Public Administration, Culture, Health, Environment, Office of the Attorney- General, IHL experts, the members of autonomous communities, and the Spanish Red Cross. secretariat: and Chairmanship Foreign Affairs and Cooperation Attorney- Education, Health, Culture, Justice, General’s Department, armed forces and police. Chairmanship: Legal Adviser, Ministry ExternalLegal Adviser, of Affairs Secretariat:

Royal Decision March 2000

November 2007

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 16 Ministers, Established: 2007 basis:Legal Decree 1513/2007 of Established: 2000 basis:Legal of the Cabinet of

committee

of Name and address Comisíon Nacional de Aplicación del Internacional Derecho Humanitario c/o Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación Plaza Provincia, de la 1 España +91Tel.: 379 99 12/13 Fax: +91 364 06 45 28012 Madrid 28012 National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of External Affairs Republic Building Colombo 1 Sri Lanka +94Tel.: 0112 2325371 Fax: 333450 +94 0112 Country Spain Sri LankaSri 202 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To review domestic review determine legislation to To whether it is in line with IHL and to suggest possible improvements set up mechanismsTo and take measures to IHLimplement approveTo programmes to spread knowledge of IHL and follow up implementation of legislative provisions in this area consider, approveTo and organize workshops and any other activities related to IHL in Sudan and activities other and conferences in participate to abroad studyTo new developments in IHL and make national recommendations relevant the to authorities cooperateTo and exchange experiences with international organizations and regional national, and assist the relevant national authorities in the drafting of reports coordinateTo government efforts and to advise mattersthe State IHL-related on

Mandate • • • • • • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry of Justice of Ministry 1

The chairman, the rapporteur, Secretariat: the executive director and the finance director, and one other person appointed by the chairman Representatives: Higher Education, Health, Interior, Justice, Education, Humanitarian Affairs, International Cooperation, Information, Council of Ministers, Chairman of the Law Commission of the National Assembly, Sudanese Intelligence services, dignitaries and experts, and the Crescent Red Sudanese Chairmanship: Composition

February

48 of 8

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 2003 Operation: Internal regulations Established: 2003 basis:Legal Presidential Decree committee

of Name and address National Commission Commission National for International Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Justice PO Box 302 Al Nil Avenue Khartoum Sudan Country Sudan ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 203 To take measuresTo and to set up the mechanisms needed to implement IHL

Mandate • Foreign Affairs and Trade, Ministry of Foreign Affairs 1

and Trade Representatives: Defence, Home Affairs, Health and Social Welfare, Education, Private and Cabinet Office, Attorney-General’s Office, Royal Swaziland Police, Correctional Services, University of Swaziland and the Baphalali Swaziland Red Cross Society Chairmanship: Composition

Cabinet November

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal paper of 23 2004 Established: 2004 basis:Legal committee

of Name and address National Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Mr Melusi Masuku Legal Adviser Ministry Foreign of Affairs and Trade Second Floor Library Building Mbabane Swaziland +268Tel.: 404 2661/2/3 Fax: +268 404 2669 Email: melusim2001@ yahoo.com Country Swaziland 204 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To monitorTo implementation of IHL at the national level spread knowledgeTo of IHL in Sweden monitorTo progress in IHL-related matters and recommend to the government possible areas for development

Mandate • • •

Foreign Affairs, Defence, Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry Foreign of Affairs 1

Representatives: Defence National Swedish forces, armed College, civil defence, Save the Children Fund, legal experts, and the Chairmanship: Representatives: Health, civil defence, armed forces, Swedish National Defence College and the Swedish Red Cross secretariat: and Chairmanship Ministry of Defence Composition

Decision

June 1991

Established: 1995 basis:Legal of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal of 20 (Bill 1990/91:102) Established: 1991 basis:Legal Government decision committee

Advisory Group on Public Law International c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Gustav Adolfs 1 Torg Box 21 161 P.O. 39103 Stockholm Sweden +46Tel.: 8 405 5985 of Name and address Swedish Defence Total International for Council Law Humanitarian c/o Ministry of Defence Jakobsgatan 9 33103 Stockholm Sweden +46Tel.: 00 8 763 10 Fax: +46 89 8 723 11 Country Sweden ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 205 To exchange informationTo and provide coordination matters the national at IHL-related on level ensure uniformityTo in implementing IHL and to raise awareness of the State’s obligations under IHL evaluate existingTo domestic law submit recommendations progress ensure to To in implementation, and to encourage dissemination, of IHL

Mandate • • • •

Foreign Affairs, Defence, 1

Composition Representatives: Justice, Finance, Civil Protection and Sport secretariat: and Chairmanship Ministry Foreign of Affairs

Decision December 2009

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal 16 Established: 2009 basis:Legal of the Federal Council,

committee

Email: dv-humvoelkerrecht@ eda.admin.ch Web: http://www. eda.admin.ch/eda/ en/home/topics/intla/ humlaw/hvrk.html of 031Tel.: 325 07 68 Name and address Comité interdépartemental internationalde droit humanitaire Directorate for International Law, Interdepartmental Committee for International Humanitarian Law c/o Section International LawHumanitarian Kochergasse 10 Bern 3003 Switzerland Country Switzerland 206 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To coordinateTo national action to disseminate IHL and to spread knowledge of the law adopt domestic legislation To examine violationsTo of IHL provideTo support for the and the general directorate for civil international cooperationdefence and promoteTo the domestic implementation of IHL and the ratification of IHL instruments analyseTo domestic legislation and make proposals for bringing it into line with IHL coordinateTo the activities of institutions or agencies involved in implementing IHL help spreadTo knowledge of IHL, especially by developing courses in IHL for all levels of education and for use in the armed forces cooperateTo with State bodies and with international organizations matters on to related the development IHL of

Mandate • • • • • • • • • Ministry of Justice of Ministry Foreign Affairs, Defence, Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry for Red Crescent Deputy Prime Minister 1

Directorate Constitutional for Affairs and the Law of the Sea Vice-Chairmanship: Secretariat: Guarantees Rights Citizens’ of Representatives: Justice, Interior, Red Crescent Affairs and the Law of the Sea, Higher Education, civil defence and the Syrian Arab Red Crescent. Chairmanship: Representatives: Culture, Health, Interior, Security, Justice, Emergency Environment, Labour, Education, Situations, Deputy Prime Minister, Presidential Border-Protection Guard, and Administration Committee, scholars and the Red Crescent Society of Tajikistan Chairmanship: Composition

August

June

Decree

2.989 of 2 277 of 2 July 1999

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 2004 No. Operation: Internal regulations 3 of 1999 Established: 2004 basis:Legal Established: 1999 basis:Legal Governmental Decree committee

of Name and address National Committee on International Law Humanitarian The Cabinet Shahbandar Mezra’a, Street, Behind the Central Bank of Syria Damascus Syria +963Tel.: 2450 250 11 Fax: +963 43 245 10 11 Commission on Implementation the of International under Law Humanitarian the Government of the Republic Tajikistan of Prospekt Rudaki 80 734001 Dushanbe Tajikistan +992372Tel.: 76 46 24 Country Syrian Arab Republic Tajikistan ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 207 To review, and proposeTo to the government, laws and regulations for applying IHL contributeTo to promoting and teaching IHL and to making it more accessible to the public monitorTo respect for and implementation of IHL To review andTo present to the government recommendations related to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and its two Protocols, and to the 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional its Weapons and five Protocols.

Mandate • • • •

Foreign Affairs, Defence, Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Foreign Affairs 1

Communications

Representatives: Justice, Interior, Health, Affairs Women’s and Social Welfare, National Human Rights Commission, scholars, religious leaders, and Cross. Red Togolese the secretariat: and Chairmanship Justice of Ministry Composition Representatives: and Communications, Defence, Security, Prosecutor’s Public Culture, Health, Education, Office,Trinidad Tobagoand the and Red Cross. Chairmanship: )

June

ad hoc 211 of 211

Cabinet

); 2001 ( 97-031 of 11

February 2001

ad hoc Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 1997 Decision No. 21 Established: 1997 ( Established: 1997 basis:Legal Interministerial Order Legal basis:Legal

M - committee

of Inter Committee on International inisterial Law Humanitarian Ministry Foreign of Affairs and Communications, Republic and of Trinidad Tobago C Tower Levels 10-14, Waterfront Complex Road Wrightson 1A Port of Spain andTrinidad Tobago 1 (868)Tel.: 623 6894 Email: minister@ foreign.gov.tt Name and address Commission de interministérielle mise du droit en œuvre humanitaire international c/o Ministère de la Justice Box 1325 P.O. Lomé Togo Country Togo Trinidad Tobago and 208 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To prepareTo recommendations for bringing domestic legislation into line with IHL draw up andTo carry out, in conjunction with the pertinent strategy bodies, national annual an for IHL implementing and disseminating Tunisia in provide,To when called upon to do so, legal recommendations on the applicability of IHL and related matters coordinateTo the activities of State bodies in international the commitments in implementing areas of human rights and IHL developTo national reports on the implementation human with international to obligations regard of pertinent the to rights submission for international commissions developTo recommendations for adapting with accordance in legislation domestic international treaties on human rights and IHL monitorTo the process of bringing domestic legislation into line with IHL and international standards rights human facilitates accession of Turkmenistan to international treaties on human rights law and IHL implementation of assesses Turkmenistan’s international treaties on human rights and IHL drafts recommendations on implementing Turkmenistan’s obligations with regard to human rights and IHL

Mandate • • • • • • • • • • In accordance with its tasks, the commission: 1st Deputies 1st of Foreign Justice and Human Human Justice and Deputy Prime Minister/ Minister of Justice and 1

experts, and the Red Tunisian Crescent.

Minister of ForeignMinister of Affairs Representatives: Affairs, Justice Defence, General the of and Prosecutor’s Office; Deputy Ministers of Interior, TV and Radio Broadcasting, Education, Health and Medical Industries, Labour and Social Welfare, Economy and Development, Deputy Head of the Supreme Court; Head of the Committee on Human Rights of the Mejlis (Parliament); Director of the Institute of State and Law under the President Turkmenistan; of Deputy Chairmen of State Statistics Committee, of Gengeshi on religion issues; Chairmen of the Trade Union and Youth Union ; Chairladies of the UnionWomen’s of Turkmenistan and of the Red Crescent Society of Turkmenistan Chairmanship: Rights, pertinent other general ministries, commissioner rights, human for High Committee for Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Union Tunisian of Solidarity, Composition Representatives: IHL Chairmanship: Human Rights or his/her representative

Decree 33, of

, No. April 2006

2006-1051

April 2006 August 2011

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. of 20 published in the Official Journal 25 12 basis:Legal 117886 Resolution Established: 2006 basis:Legal Established: committee

of Name and address Commission nationale nationale Commission internationalde droit humanitaire c/o Ministry of Justice Rights Human and Boulevard31, Bab Bnet 1019 Tunis Tunisia Interagency Commission Commission Interagency on Securing the of Implementation Obligations International in of Turkmenistan the Sphere of Human Rights and International Law Humanitarian Commitments c/o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archabil Avenue, Building 108, Ashgabat Turkmenistan Country Tunisia Turkmenistan ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 209 provides support for disseminating information on on information support disseminating for provides human rights and IHL cooperates with State organizations, public organizations international organizations and in the areas of human rights and IHL ensures follow-up on the implementation of commission the by made recommendations carries out other activities in accordance with its mandate. To prioritizeTo the status and duties of the committee work onTo pending IHL-related legislation in Uganda

Mandate • • • • • • In a high-level 2012, working group on IHL was set up within the commission. The group consisted of the following: First Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Deputy Minister of Education, Deputy Minister of Justice, Deputy Minister of Defence, Director of the National Institute for Democracy and Human Rights under the President of Turkmenistan, and the chairlady of the Turkmenistan Red Crescent. A plan of action was adopted and each member of the working group given specific tasks and deadlines. Director of the Turkmen Defence, Justice and Office of the Prime Minister 1

Head of the Department of the Composition Vice-chairmanship: National Institute of Democracy and Human Rights Secretariat: Turkmen National Institute of Democracy and Human Rights Representatives: Constitutional Affairs, Internal Affairs, Gender, Labour and Social Development, Finance, Uganda People’s Defence Force and the Ugandan Red Cross Society Chairmanship:

29 May Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Established: 2010 basis:Legal 2009 resolutions on IHL committee

of Name and address Ugandan International Ugandan International Law Humanitarian National Committee c/o Ministry of Justice Constitutionaland Affairs Justice Law and Order Sector Box 7183 P.O. Kampala Uganda Country Turkmenistan (continued) Uganda 210 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To examine domesticTo Ukrainian law and formulate recommendations for bringing it into line with IHL and related international agreements which to Ukraine is party coordinateTo the activities of the ministries, other authorities and public organizations that are concerned with implementing IHL assist To local and State authorities in promoting and disseminating IHL bolsterTo the implementation of IHL and to coordination competent the among ensure State authorities legislation submit and to review IHL-related To recommendations the on subject collectTo data and statistics related to State IHL with connection in contributions strengthenTo cooperation and exchange of experiences with National Societies, other and organizations active in the area of IHL set up plansTo and training programmes and to organize seminars, with a view to raising awareness of and disseminating IHL

Mandate • • • • • • • • Ukrainian Red Cross Foreign Affairs, Justice, Foreign Affairs, Justice, Ministry of Justice of Ministry Deputy Prime Minister and 1

United Arab Emirates’ Red Cabinet of Ministers Vice-chairmanship: StateMinister of Foreign for Affairs Secretariat: Crescent Representatives: Emergency Situations, Finance, Interior, Health, Economy, Education, Culture, Human Rights, Cabinet of Ministers, armed forces, and Ukrainian Red Cross Chairmanship: Secretariat: Representatives: Interior, Islamic Affairs and Awqaf, Supreme Command of the Armed Forces, The Supreme Council for National Security, University of the United Arab Emirates and the United Arab Crescent Red Emirates’ Chairmanship: Composition

1157 1157

Decision November

32 of the Council of

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Resolution No. of the Cabinet of Ministers, 21 July 2000 Operation: Internal regulations and composition approved on 21 July 2000 No. Ministers, 1 2004 Established: 2000 basis:Legal Established: 2004 basis:Legal committee

of Name and address Interdepartmental Committee for the Implementation of International in Law Humanitarian Ukraine Horodetskoho Str. 13, Kyiv 01001 Grushevkogo12/2Or V. 252008 Kiev Ukraine +380Tel.: 44 67 279 13 Fax:+380 44 67 279 13 National Commission Commission National for International Law Humanitarian Justice of Ministry 28 Abn Al Rafai, Adkor PO Box 260 Abu Dhabi Arab Emirates United +971 Tel.: 02 000 6814 Fax: +971 02 224 6814 Email: [email protected] Country Ukraine United Arab Emirates ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 211 To ensure interdepartmental ensure consultationTo and coordination on IHL issues review domesticTo legislation in order to identify additions and amendments needed for full implementation of IHL obligations encourageTo the dissemination of IHL in the armed forces and among other parts of the population whether United the determine Kingdom should To participate specific in international treaties and conferences IHL related to monitorTo developments in IHL and review the implications for the United Kingdom promoteTo consultations between the government, the British Red Cross and other concerned organizations considerTo giving assistance to other States in IHLimplementing

Mandate • • • • • • • Foreign and Foreign Affairs, Defence, 1

Composition Representatives: Health, Trade, Education, Interior, Justice, Social Security, Culture, International Development, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Cabinet Office, Northern Ireland Office, Devolved Administrations for Scotland and Wales, and the British Red Cross secretariat: and Chairmanship OfficeCommonwealth

Decision Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Established: 1999 basis:Legal of the Foreign and OfficeCommonwealth committee

of Name and address Interdepartmental Committee on International Law Humanitarian c/o Foreign and OfficeCommonwealth Whitehall London SW1A 2AH United Kingdom +44Tel.: 20 7008 3562 Country United Kingdom 212 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To make recommendationsTo on disseminating IHL at all levels of public and private education contributeTo to implementing and ensuring respect for IHL by making recommendations on the adoption legislative of provisions, regulations and other measures

Mandate • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry Foreign of Affairs 1

Composition Representatives: Justice, Interior, Health, Education and and Education Health, Interior, Justice, Culture, the Supreme Court, scholars and the Uruguayan Red Cross Chairmanship:

Executive Executive 677/992

244/996 of

November 1992

June 1996

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Decrees No. of 24 and No. 3 Established: 1992 basis:Legal

U - committee

of (CNDH c/o Ministerio de r) Relaciones exteriores, Dirección de Derechos Humanos Colonia 1206 Montevideo 11600 Uruguay +5982Tel.: 902 7806, +5982 902 1327 (2215) Name and address Comisión Nacional de de Nacional Comisión Humanitario Derecho Country Uruguay ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 213 To review domesticTo legislation and propose amendments to keep pace with new developments IHL in design mechanisms,measures andprocedures To to ensure the application of IHL and effective implementation its of provisions elaborateTo plans and programmes for disseminating IHL at all levels of society and for application its monitoring superviseTo implementation of IHL provisions regulating use of the red cross and red crescent prohibiting and misuse their emblems organize, atTo the national level, seminars and other events related to IHL, and take part in pertinent international events; and regional take partTo in the examination of draft IHL treaties and make proposals and recommendations pertaining them to promoteTo cooperation and the exchange expertiseof international and with regional organizations working in the area of IHL, and lend support to government authorities these reports by and studies requested preparing organizations

Mandate • • • • • • • Ministry of Health Foreign Affairs, Defence, Ministry Foreign of Affairs 1

Yemeni Red Yemeni Crescent Vice-chairmanship: Representatives: Justice, Legal Affairs, Education, Information, Interior, and the Red Yemeni Crescent Chairmanship: Secretariat: Composition

408/1999 of

December 1999

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal No. 11 Operation: Internal regulations Established: 1999 basis:Legal Presidential Decree committee

of Name and address National Committee for International Law Humanitarian c/o Red Yemen Crescent Society Box 1257 P.O. Sana’a Yemen Country Yemen 214 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES To review domesticTo legislation in order to identify amendments needed for the full implementation of IHL encourageTo the dissemination of IHL in the public general the armed among forces and whether Zambia determine participate should To in specific international treaties and conferences IHLrelated to take partTo in the examination of draft IHL treaties and make proposals and recommendations pertaining them to adviseTo the government on ratification of or accession to new IHL treaties, and on all matters concerning IHL

Mandate • • • • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, Director of the Department of 1

Senior Legal Officer, Ministry Composition International Law and Agreements, Ministry Justice of Secretariat: Justice of Representatives: Justice, Finance and National Planning, army, air force, School of Law at the University of Zambia, and the Zambian Red Cross Chairmanship:

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Established: 2007 committee

of Name and address National Committee Implementation the for of International Law Humanitarian c\o Mrs Thandiwe Daka Oteng Acting Director, International Law and Agreements Justice of Ministry Ridgeway, Lusaka Zambia 260 251 Tel.: 211 915 588/256 Country Zambia ANNEX 7 : LIST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEES 215 To coordinateTo the human rights and IHL activities of government ministries and to advise the government on all issues related to human rights and IHL protectTo human rights and the rights arising out of IHL by promoting the application of rights IHL and international human instruments identifyTo those human rights and IHL instruments that have not been ratified and, when appropriate, to recommend that the government so does ensure complianceTo with reporting obligations under the various instruments to which Zimbabwe is party raise awarenessTo of human rights and IHL in the country by conducting workshops and seminars and by disseminating information through the media

Mandate • • • • • Foreign Affairs, Defence, 1

Composition Representatives: Health Education, Culture, Interior, Justice, and Children, Youth, Equality and Employment, President’s Office, Ombudsman, Public Prosecutor’s Office and the judiciary Chairperson of the Committee: Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Justice Legaland Affairs (currently, Acting Permanent Secretary Mr Maxwell Ranga) Chairperson of the sub-committee on IHL: Ministry of Defence (currently represented by Lt-Col Mutungwazi)

Year established/Year basis/OperationLegal Established: 1993 basis:Legal Cabinet decision

committee

of Name and address Interministerial Committee for Human Humanitarian and Rights Law c/o Mrs Mabel Msika Director, Policy and Research Legal Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs Bag 7751 Causeway P. Harare Zimbabwe +263Tel.: 4 777055 Email: mmsika2002@ yahoo.com Country Zimbabwe 8. LIST OF REGIONAL MEETINGS OF NATIONAL IHL COMMITTEES (COVERING THE ROME STATUTE) 218 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

AFRICA

South Africa, Pretoria 12th Annual Regional Seminar on IHL (14-17 August 2012)

Organized by: the South African Department of International Relations and Cooperation and the ICRC

Participants: national committee and government mem- bers from 18 African countries

Outcome: the main themes of the seminar were develop- ments related to treaties on weapons and the functioning of national IHL committees (exchange of best practices). National reports provided an overview of the ratification and implementation status of IHL instruments in the region. The participants were also informed about recent develop- ments in the law.

Nigeria, Abuja 10th ECOWAS/ICRC Seminar on IHL Implementation in West Africa (21-23 February 2012)

Organized by: ECOWAS and the ICRC

Participants: representatives of the 15 ECOWAS countries (except Cape Verde) and members of national IHL committees

Outcome: the participants enhanced their knowledge of IHL and emphasized the need to set up national IHL committees.

South Africa, Pretoria 11th Annual Regional Seminar on IHL (23-26 August 2011)

Organized by: the South African Department of International Relations and Cooperation and the ICRC ANNEX 8 : LIST OF REGIONAL MEETINGS 219

Participants: national committee and government mem- bers from 14 African countries

Outcome: the main themes of the seminar were the repres- sion of war crimes and the participation of children in armed conflicts. National reports provided an overview of the ratification and implementation status of IHL instru- ments in the region. The participants were also informed about recent developments in the law.

Nigeria, Abuja 9th ECOWAS/ICRC Seminar on IHL Implementation in West Africa (September 2010)

Organized by: ECOWAS and the ICRC

Participants: 30 representatives of the 15 ECOWAS coun- tries and members of national IHL committees

Outcome: the participants enhanced their knowledge of IHL and shared best practices.

South Africa, Pretoria 10th Annual Regional Seminar on IHL (May 2010)

Organized by: the South African Department of International Relations and Cooperation and the ICRC

Participants: two representatives each from 15 African countries

Outcome: the participants presented a report in plenary on the state of ratification, implementation and integration of IHL at their respective national levels. 220 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

ASIA

Bhutan, Thimphu Fourth South Asian Conference on International Humanitarian Law (26 February to 1 March 2012)

Organized by: the Government of Bhutan and the ICRC

Participants: members of parliament, legal advisers, ­magistrates, senior officials from the Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Defence and Justice, and national IHL committee members from 10 countries in the region

Outcome: the aim of the Conference was to share regional experiences regarding the development, adherence to, implementation and application of IHL. The topics covered were: follow-up of the Health Care in Danger project, ­environmental protection in armed conflicts, new legislation to implement the obligations arising from IHL, and recent developments concerning weapon treaties, in particular the Arms Trade Treaty.

Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 3rd Commonwealth Red Cross and Red Crescent IHL Conference (6-9 June 2011)

Organized by: the Malaysian Government and National Society, with the support of the British Government and National Society and the ICRC

Participants: members of the governments of the Commonwealth countries, and members of their national IHL committees and National Societies

Outcome: the participants exchanged experiences of the national implementation of IHL and discussed develop- ments in the law and the need to bolster the capacity, commitment and activities of Commonwealth countries in that regard. They also prepared for the 31st International ANNEX 8 : LIST OF REGIONAL MEETINGS 221

Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, and were informed about the Health Care in Danger project and the regulatory framework applicable in disaster situations.

Maldives, Male Third South Asian Conference on International Humanitarian Law (13-16 February 2011)

Organized by: the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Maldives and the ICRC

Participants: legal advisers, members of parliament, National Societies and national IHL committees, and other members of government, such as senior officials from the Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Defence and Justice and the Prime Minister’s Office, from 10 of the region’s countries

Outcome: the participants took stock of the implementa- tion of and adherence to IHL treaties in the region and worldwide. The main themes of the Conference were the first Review Conference on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, environmental protection during armed conflicts, protection of the emblem and the dissemination of IHL, notably by establishing national IHL committees.

Bangladesh, Dhaka Second South Asian Conference on International Humanitarian Law (14-17 February 2010)

Organized by: the ICRC

Participants: 27 representatives of the governments and national IHL committees of eight of the region’s countries

Outcome: the region’s governments presented their work to implement IHL and were invited to work harder for adherence to and implementation and dissemination of IHL, in particular by establishing national IHL committees. 222 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA

Kazakhstan, Astana IVth Regional Seminar on Implementation of International Humanitarian Law - Weapons: a health- based approach (2-3 October 2012)

Organized by: the Kazakh Government and the ICRC

Participants: members of the governments and national IHL committees of the countries of the Community of Independent States (CIS) and of Georgia

Outcome: conclusions and recommendations taken up and adopted by the competent bodies of the CIS

Serbia, Belgrade Regional Meeting of National Committees on IHL in Central and South-eastern Europe (28-29 June 2012)

Organized by: the Serbian International Humanitarian Law Committee and the ICRC

Participants: representatives of seven national IHL commit- tees (including Austria) and of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs of three Central European countries

Outcome: the national IHL committees exchanged best practices with the countries planning to or in the course of establishing a national IHL committee.

Belarus, Minsk 3rd Regional Seminar on IHL Implementation, in tandem with the launch of the Russian version of the ICRC publication entitled The Domestic Implementation of International Humanitarian Law: A Manual (November 2010)

Organized by: the Belarus Ministry of Justice and the ICRC ANNEX 8 : LIST OF REGIONAL MEETINGS 223

Participants: 34 representatives of the governments and national IHL committees of the CIS countries, Georgia, Finland and the Republic of Moldova

Outcome: the participants exchanged experiences of the implementation of IHL, discussed the problems they faced and possible solutions. They forged ties with the people in charge of implementing IHL in other countries with a view to improving their application mechanisms.

Switzerland, Geneva Third Universal Meeting of National Committees for the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law (October 2010)

Organized by: the ICRC

Participants: 220 officials representing over 100 countries (79 of which have a national IHL committee and 21 observer countries), and experts from international organizations

Outcome: the participants discussed the important role of domestic law in preventing and responding to serious viola- tions of IHL; specifically, they addressed questions relating to the national legal measures and mechanisms required to support an integrated system for the repression of serious violations of IHL and other international crimes. 224 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

LATIN AMERICA

El Salvador, San Salvador Continental Seminar of National IHL Committees for the Protection of Cultural Property in Situations of Armed Conflict (1-2 December 2011)

Organized by: El Salvador’s Comité Interinstitucional de Derecho Internacional Humanitario and the ICRC

Participants: representatives of the national IHL commit- tees of 11 Latin American and Caribbean countries and of Austria, France and Switzerland

Outcome: the aim of the seminar was to draw up conclu- sions and recommendations for the practical and effective implementation, at national level, of the treaty obligations of the countries taking part in terms of protection of cultural property in situations of armed conflict.

Mexico, Mexico City International Conference of National IHL Committees of Latin America and the Caribbean (30 June to 2 July 2010)

Organized by: Mexico’s Comisión Intersecretarial de Derecho Internacional Humanitario, under the auspices of the Mexican Foreign Affairs Ministry, and the ICRC

Participants: 16 national IHL committees and represen- tatives of Suriname, the Mexican Congress, the Inter- American Juridical Committee, and the General Secretariat of the OAS.

Outcome: the adoption of conclusions and recommendations ANNEX 8 : LIST OF REGIONAL MEETINGS 225

MIDDLE EAST

United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi Ninth Arab Government Experts Meeting on the Harmonization of Domestic Legislation with International Humanitarian Law (10-12 January 2012)

Organized by: the National Commission for Humanitarian Law and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the United Arab Emirates, in cooperation with the ICRC and the League of Arab States

Participants: 50 government experts and members of national IHL committees of 15 Arab countries, experts from the ICRC and the League of Arab States

Outcome: after having discussed various IHL-related sub- jects and exchanged experiences in that regard, the partici- pants adopted a regional plan of action for implementation of IHL in 2012-2013.

Morocco, Rabat Eighth Arab Government Experts Meeting on the Harmonization of Domestic Legislation with International Humanitarian Law (12-14 January 2011)

Organized by: the ICRC, in cooperation with Morocco’s Commission nationale de droit international humanitaire

Participants: members of the national IHL committees and other government members of 18 Arab countries, plus the Secretary General of the Arab Inter-Parliamentary Union and the legal adviser to General Secretariat of the League of Arab States

Outcome: the aim of the meeting was to gauge the pro- gress made at national level on on the League of Arab States’ Model Law Project on Crimes under the Jurisdiction of the ICC, which was adopted by the League of Arab States. 9. PLEDGES MADE AT THE REVIEW CONFERENCE OF THE ROME STATUTE AND THE 30TH AND 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES OF THE RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT *

* The texts of the pledges are reproduced in their original language. 228 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties actors. interested other and accedeTo to the International Criminal Court Privileges and Immunities Agreement give considerationTo to acceding to the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance give considerationTo to acceding to the First and Second Protocols to the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict give considerationTo to ratifying the amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted at the Kampala Review Conference of the Statute that concluded June 2010 on 11

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions,the Depositary undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: (Pledge P1426) 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • • • • 50,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 € € , by holding a seminar

alia T T T T

immediately after the Conference. 1. disseminate the results of the Review Conference he Argentine Republic pledges to of the Rome Statute at the national level in order to exchange views with the relevant stakeholders, inter 2. process to reach an agreement with the Court on he Argentine Republic pledges to expedite a witnesses. of relocation the 1. o make a voluntary contribution of 2. o make a voluntary contribution of to the Fund Trust for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) noting in 2010, the importance of participation by LDCs in the Assembly of States Parties and the goal of universality of the Rome Statute. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010) to the Fund Trust for Victims noting in 2010, the importance of the participation of victims in the Review Conference and the unique role of victims under the Rome Statute.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) S

Argentina Australia I. tates party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 229

)

1

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; reinforcing dialogue international on humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties actors. interested other and exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms;

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions,the Depositary undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: (Pledge P1096 • • •

T T T

30,000 by September 2010. 3. accession International the Court to Criminal o progress Australia’s consideration of Privileges and Immunities Agreement, noting the importance of this Agreement to the functioning of an effective and independent Court. 1. Criminal Court’s Fund Trust for Victims of o make a contribution to the International € 2. International Criminal Court with a view to o enter into discussions with the signing a Memorandum regarding the relocation of witnesses of the International Criminal Court Austria. to Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

) 2 The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. 30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) (Pledge P089 Cyprus, Costa Rica, Côte d d’Ivoire, Croatia, Denmark, Djibouti, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Honduras,Democratic Hungary, Ireland, Republic, Italy, Liechtenstein, Japan, the Lao People’s Madagascar, Mali, Mexico, Monaco, Morocco, the Netherlands, Peru, Poland, Portugal,Switzerland, the Republic Tajikistan, of Korea, the former Slovakia, Yugoslav Republic Slovenia, Spain, of Macedonia, Sweden, Ukraine Palestine. from observer the and and Uruguay; Tobago; and the National Trinidad and Societies Sweden Slovenia, Slovakia, Leone, of Sierra Botswana,Philippines, Côte d’Ivoire, Gambia, Madagascar, Monaco, the Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom. J J

Australia (continued) Austria 1. oint pledge made by: the governments of Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Chile, the Cook Islands, 2. oint pledge made by the governments of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, 230 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

) 3 reinforcing dialogue on international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High actors interested Contracting Parties other and to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

International Criminal CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • • (Pledge P1311 n inter-ministerial working inter-ministerial n A

T

3. the crimes falling under the jurisdiction of o complete the process of integrating Internationalthe Court Criminal Austrian into domestic criminal law pursuant to Resolution ICC-ASP/5/Res.3. group under the lead of the Federal Ministry for European International and Affairs already has made good progress. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom, and by the European Union. J

Austria (continued) 3. oint pledge made by the governments of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 231

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • •

C

1. accord-cadred’un en matière d’exécution des onclusion avec la Cour pénale internationale peines, pour l’ouverture de la Conférence de révision de Kampala. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: (Pledge P119) conclure à Le Gouvernement s’engage belge un accord bilatéral de coopération renforcée entre le Royaume de Belgique et la Cour pénale internationale,permettant Belgique en d’exécuter Cour. la par prononcées convictions des Belgium 232 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

l’amendement à l’article 8, §2, e), du Statut de Rome visant à ajouter à la liste des crimes de guerre pour les conflits armés non internationaux: l’emploi de poison ou d’armes empoisonnées, l’emploi de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires ainsi que tous les liquides, matières ou procédés analogues, et l’utilisation de balles qui s’épanouissent ou s’aplatissent facilement dans le corps humain, telles que les balles dont l’enveloppe dure ne recouvre pas entièrement le centre ou est percée d’entailles; les amendements au Statut de Rome relatifs au crime d’agression adoptés par la Conférence de révision juin 2010. le 11

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1264) Les Autorités belges s’engagent à ratifier les amendements suivants au Statut de Rome adoptés lors de la Conférence de révision organisée à Kampala juin 2010 du 31 mai au 11 et à adapter, pour autant que de besoin, le droit conséquence: en belge • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Belgium (continued) ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 233

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: • • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Belgium (continued) 234 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

e

) 4 4 relatif à la répression relatif la 4 à des violations

Les Autorités belges et la Croix-Rouge de Belgique prennent acte du Plan d’action quadriennal pour la mise en œuvre du droit XXXI la à présenté international humanitaire Conférence internationale de la Croix-Rouge et du Croissant-Rouge (2011), en particulier son 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge 1321 objectif international droit humanitaire. du graves Dans le cadre de cet objectif, les Autorités belges, en collaboration avec la Croix-Rouge de Belgique, continueront d’accorder une attention particulière à la diffusion du droit international humanitaire auprès des acteurs judiciaires, avocats et magistrats, en raison de leur rôle central dans la poursuite et la répression des violations graves de ce droit. Conformément à l’obligation des États de diffuser le droit international humanitaire, telle que prévue par les Conventions de Genève de 1949 leurs Protocoleset additionnels, Autorités les belges, en collaboration avec la Croix-Rouge de séances de l’organisation poursuivront Belgique, de diffusion du droit international humanitaire à del’aide supports adéquats auprès des acteurs judiciaires.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) J

Belgium (continued) 4. oint pledge by the Government and National Society of Belgium. ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 235

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors. exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Botswana Brazil 236 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • •

crimes, and to ensure effective

To provideTo technical assistance to States which are not Parties to the Rome Statute, to include crimes set out in articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Statute, as punishable offences under their national laws, to establish jurisdiction over these enforcement of those laws. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Bulgaria ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 237

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: • • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Bulgaria (continued) 238 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • •

M C D D C R

1. immunités de la Cour. atification de l’Accord sur les privilèges et 2. affaires liées à la CPI. ésignation point d’un focal national pour les 3. coopération avec la CPI, de façon compatible ise en œuvre de lois qui faciliteraient la avec les normes et principes du Statut. 4. des sein au interministériel inter-agences ou onstitution groupe d’un de réflexion gouvernements nationaux pour coordonner l’information à propos des demandes de coopération. 5. liées à la CPI dans les ambassades ayant, en ésignation point d’un focal pour les affaires raison de leur localisation, un lien avec la CPI, notamment à La Haye, New York ou Addis- Abeba, et présentation de ce point focal au facilitateur de l’AEP sur la coopération. 6. initiatives leurs dans régionales internationales et oopération avec les organisations liées à la CPI, notamment pour l’adoption de résolutions soutenant la CPI, la rédaction de modèles de loi de mise en œuvre, la création de projets de renforcement des capacités sur la CPI, autres. entre Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Burkina Faso ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 239

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at:

E

7. et à renforcer les capacités sur le Statut de ngagement à améliorer la formation juridique Rome dans les systèmes nationaux d’éducation justice. de et Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

) 5 To continueTo to reaffirm the importance of international humanitarian norms through Canada’s ICC and Accountability Campaign, which supports projects designed to promote the effective operation International the of Criminal Court and other accountability mechanisms. 30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) (Pledge P291 J

Burkina Faso (continued) Canada Cambodia 5. oint pledge by the Government and National Society of Canada. 240 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

) 6

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) (Pledge P296 To continueTo to focus on targeted and cost- effective technical legal assistance, capacity building, education and outreach, particularly in States and among populations most affected by considered.the being crimes continueTo to encourage the widespread ratification and implementation of the Rome Statute of the ICC, with a view to ending the culture of impunity for serious violations of international humanitarian law. To promoteTo safe and unhindered humanitarian access to individuals and communities in need, and support measures or initiatives that improve the safety of humanitarian workers. encourageTo greater coordination among agencies on security management issues, appropriate of implementation promote procedures and training for national and international staff and support research related to their safety and security. promoteTo ratification and respect of relevant bringing international treaties, including to justice those who attack humanitarian personnel. J

Canada (continued) 6. oint pledge by the Government and National Society of Canada. ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 241

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • •

C C C E C

1. presentarencaminados Parlamento a el ante posibles esfuerzos los todos fectuar Nacional Proyecto un de Ley sobre cooperación Cortecon la Internacional,de antes Penal diciembre de 2011. 1. and cooperation to the ICC in accordance to the olombia will continue to provide support provisions of the Rome Statute in a transparent, effective manner. and constructive, 2. prosecute crimes at the national level more olombia will strive to investigate and effectively. 3. Congress the ICC Cooperation Bill. olombia will present to the National 4. Justice the as such initiatives complementarity olombia will continue to support positive (JRR). Mechanism Response Rapid Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Chile Colombia 242 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Cook Islands Cook ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 243

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • (Pledge P1101) Retomar y reimpulsar el proyecto de ley de reforma del Código Penal sobre crímenes de guerra y lesa humanidad, que incluye aspectos tales como la responsabilidad penal de los superiores jerárquicos, la obediencia debida y otras causas eximentes, la imprescriptibilidad de los anteriores delitos e importantes elementos cooperaciónde Corte con la Internacional Penal y cumplimiento del principio de la jurisdicción universal complementaria, de acuerdo con las obligaciones asumidas por Costa Rica bajo el Estatuto de Roma, así como aquellas correspondientes a los Convenios de Ginebra y Protocolossus adicionales.

C C

1. los esfuerzos necesarios para impulsar una osta Rica se compromete a realizar todos mayor difusión y promoción de la Corte Penal International, así como a expandir su apoyo y otras en institucionesentendimiento publicas. Además, participará apoyará y celebración la de actividades académicas centradas la en international. penal justicia promoción la de 2. Cortela conformidad Internacional, de Penal osta Rica se compromete a cooperar con con lo establecido en el Estatuto de Roma y las resoluciones sobre la materia de la Asamblea de los Estados Partes, para ello, el país se “Protocolo adoptar a un compromete nacional cooperaciónde Corte con la Internacional” Penal que desarrolle, entre otras, las disposiciones Capitulote la Parte IX del Estatuto de Roma. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

dicionalmente, se A

E E

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 1. a través del Poder Ejecutivo a realizar todo el l estado de Costa Rica se compromete cabildeo y gestiones necesarias para la aprobación legislativa los de proyectos recientemente enviados al Congreso sobre crímenes de guerra y lesa humanidad (modificación al Código Penal y la Convención sobre Imprescriptibilidad en la materia; 2 Protocolos (de gases asfixiantes y el protocolo V a la Convención de 1980) y Enmienda a la Convención de 19801. compromete incorporar a corriente la a legislativa la Convención para la protección de las personas forzadas. desapariciones las contra 2. compromete a la ejecución de una campaña n cuanto al tema de armas, el Estado se masiva para sensibilizar en el tema de posesión de armas, con el fin de prevenir el uso de ellas consecuentemente, violencia. la Asimismo, y, introducir en el proyecto de reforma a la Ley de Armas la arista de protección al Derecho EstadoInternacional el Humanitario. Finalmente, costarricense continuar a compromete se impulsando la creación de un instrumento jurídico internacional que regule el tráfico de armas. Así también, impulsando compromete se seguir el a de suscripción por la propugna proceso que Oslo de un tratado que prohíba las municiones de racimo. (Pledge P253) Por la presente, nos comprometemos a lo siguiente, para los años 2008-2011: Costa Rica 244 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1104) La CCDIH se compromete a llevar a cabo capacitaciones en favor de sectores clave como los diferentes cuerpos de policía con el fin de facilitar una mayor difusión y entendimiento del DIH en el contexto costarricense. La CCDIH la promover a compromete se capacitación de abogados, fiscales y jueces en materia de represión de crímenes de guerra, de lesa humanidad y otros relacionados al ámbito de acción del DIH y el derecho penal internacional. La CCDIH, especialmente con el compromiso del Centro de Patrimonio del Ministerio de Cultura, promoverá la sensibilización en materia de protección del patrimonio cultural, así como identificaciónla bienes de y señalamiento culturales.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010) Por último, se hará un balance sobre los temas pendientes de implementación a nivel nacional y se medirá la posibilidad de cumplirlos a mediano o a largo plazo. El “Protocolo” identificará los puntos de enlace nacional (Dirección Política Exterior MREC, Dirección Jurídica MREC, Comisión CostarricenseDerecho International Humanitario) y el papel de las diversas instituciones nacionales llamadas a aplicar una solicitud de cooperación Corte la de judicial International. Además, Penal detallará el procedimiento aplicable desde su recepción en la Dirección Jurídica del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto hasta la ejecución de la solicitud. El documento definirá los principios de complementariedad, entrega de personas, inmunidad y pena perpetua, a la luz del Estatuto de Roma y su correspondencia en el marco constitucional nacional.

E

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 3. con el objetivo de un cambio de paradigma en campo el n relacionado migración, de la tratamiento del fenómeno, se pasará de un sistema migratorio basado en el control a una política que enfatice en la integración. Para ello, se impulsará la creación dentro de la Dirección General de Migración y Extranjería de Costa Rica, de una Dirección de Integración de la comunidad migrante en el país, con el fin, entre otros, de velar por la protección de los migrantes y refugiados victimas de un conflicto armado. En segundo término, se generará una adecuación normativas paradigma. nuevo del Costa Rica (continued) ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 245

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

royecto de ley P

P P S A Proyecto de Ley 16272, incorpora crímenes

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 1. de guerra y lesa humanidad en el Código Penal 2. Protocolo sobre prohibición del uso en la guerra royecto de Ley 16695 Aprobación del de gases asfixiantes, tóxicos o similares y de bacteriológicos medios 3. Prohibiciones sobre Convención la a Enmienda royecto de Ley16698 Aprobación de la o Restricciones del Empleo de ciertas Armas considerarse puedan que Convencionales excesivamente nocivas o de efectos indiscriminados 4. Protocolos sobres Restos Explosivos de Guerra probación Proyecto de Ley 16694 de 28 Noviembre de 2003, Protocolo V a la Convención de 1980 5. 16699 de Aprobación de la Convención sobre imprescriptibilidad de Crímenes de Guerra y de Lesa Humanidad de 26 de noviembre de Reforma1968 y, a la Ley de Uso y Protección de los Emblemas de la Cruz Roja y de la Media Luna Roja, reconociendo la adopción del signo Cristal denominado distintivo adicional Rojo 2. con ACNUR con el fin de analizar el conflicto e promueve la coordinación permanente armado del país de origen del refugiado(a), así como generar estadísticas confiables que permitan mejorar la toma de decisiones orientadas a las personas que huyen de los armados. conflictos Costa Rica (continued) 246 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • (Pledge P1371) Incorporer des crimes de droit international humanitaire (DIH) dans la législation nationale.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Côte d’Ivoire Côte ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 247

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • •

T

1. prosecutors charge and judges in employees, o organize a seminar for Government cooperationof with International the Criminal Court so as to reaffirm Croatia’s commitment to cooperation with the ICC and to the fight against impunity, with special focus on the Review Conference results. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.”

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P332) The Government of the Republic of Croatia aligns itself with the following EU pledge: “2) National Implementation and Enforcement (joint pledge) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Croatia 248 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

(Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • •

The Czech Republic will start the accession process to the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the International Criminal Court by the end of 2010. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Czech Republic Czech ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 249

) 7

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties actors. interested other and

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • (Pledge P1210 The [State Party] hereby pledges to promote universal ratification or accession and effective implementation and enforcement of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict. The [National Society] hereby pledges to support its ensuring towards steps government by ratification or accession, if not already done, and effective implementation and enforcement of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict. 130,000 to the ICC Special €

D E A c

Fund for the Relocation of Witnesses. 1. ontribution of 2. Agreement with the ICC. nter into Enforcement of Sentences 3. approximately US $10,000 to CICC to support enmark has for contributed 2010 the on participation including activities, their Review Conference. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: J Denmark

7. oint pledge by the Governments and National Societies of Denmark and Slovenia. 250 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 The [National Society] also pledges to encourage ratificationits ensuring towards government or accession, if not already done, and effective implementation and enforcement of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict (Article 3 (2)). Further, the [National Society] pledges to document the consequences of recruitment of persons under the by armed age of 18 forces and groups, and to encourage its government to adapt national legislation in order to prohibit the recruitment of persons under the age of 18 by all armed forces and groups and to ensure and prosecuted are responsible those that sanctioned. (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Denmark (continued) ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 251

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it. exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: • • • • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Denmark (continued) Djibouti 252 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Estonia ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 253

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • •

T T T

1. worldwide by supporting financially and through o commit to enhance complementarity other means the work of the Coalition for the International Criminal Court in its efforts to raise awareness of the work of the ICC, to promote ratifications of the Rome Statute and to enhance the readiness of national jurisdictions to meet their obligations under the Rome Statute. 2. least developed countries and other developing o support financially the participation of the States in the sessions of the Assembly of States Parties. 3. Fund for Victims for the benefit of victims of o continue to support the efforts of the Trust crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court, and of the families of such victims by contributing funds to the Fund. Trust Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Finland 254 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

(Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • •

T T

4. ICC and to assist States with complementarity o continue to enhance cooperation with the through Justice Rapid Response (JRR), the first multilateral stand-by facility of criminal justice professionals from the global south and north international investigations trained in who are and who are available at short notice to respond to requests of assistance appropriately made international law;under working with partners to help more than double the roster of readily available experts to to by 100 ensure July 2011; full regional, gender and linguistic balance in this roster; and to support constantly upgraded roster the that can program that ensure training is “evergreen” and consists of actually available experts to assist the States, the ICC and the UN system. 5. Enforcement Sentences of with International the o conclude an Agreement on the Criminal Court as a follow-up to the declaration of the willingness of Finland to accept persons sentenced by the Court, for the purpose of enforcement sentences of imprisonment of in Finland, in accordance with article (1) 103 (b) of the Rome Statute, which was submitted to the Court after the Rome Statute had been ratified Finland.by Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Finland (continued) ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 255

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • •

L L décembre 2009.

1. sa coopérationet 2011 avec la Cour pénale a France à continuer s’engage en 2010 séminaires de l’organisation internationale dans régionaux de sensibilisation à la justice pénale formation de aux que internationale ainsi mécanismes et procédures de la tels Cour, que celui intitulé “Regards croisés sur les enjeux et perspectives de la justice internationale: la Cour juridictions les internationale et pénale au Sénégal 7 au du organisé nationales” 11 Ces séminaires sont destinés aux États parties comme aux États non parties au Statut de Rome. 2. aux programmes d’ONG de sensibilisation a France maintiendra son soutien aux activités de la Cour pénale internationale. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: France 256 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: • • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) France (continued) ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 257

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • (Pledge P1376) Georgia pledges to strengthen its efforts to disseminate international humanitarian law professionals, including legal national to prosecutors judges. and

G T T will organize a Summer School for law/ studentsinternational Rome the law regarding Statute, International the Court Criminal international to treaties other related and law. humanitarian Georgia will organize training for prosecutors International the to issues the relating on Criminal Court.

1. of events promoting the knowledge regarding the eorgia hereby pledges to organize two types International Court, Criminal namely: a) raining Center of Ministry of Justice a) raining Center for Ministry of Justice of Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P205) The Government of Georgia aligns itself with the EU pledge on National Implementation and Enforcement IHL. of Georgia pledges: Georgia 258 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • 300,000 for the 250,000 available in €

T T T

1. a voluntary contribution of € o support the Fund Trust for Victims by budgetary 2010. year 2. a fixed-term appointment as legal adviser to the o fund the secondment of a legal expert for FundTrust for Victims for the years and 2010 2011. 3. o make funds of 2010 in order2010 to support projects related to the promotion of accession to or implementation of Statute. Rome the Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010) -

encourager la :

) 8 to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the International Court Criminal enforce order to in IHL and repression ensure breaches grave of of IHL.

Par la présente, nous prenons pour les années années les pour prenons nous présente, la Par 30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • de l’engagement 2008-2011 reconnaissance, par les États, de la compétence Commission la de internationale humanitaire d’éta blissement des faits et, le cas échéant, encourager son utilisation par les parties à un conflit armé. (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation humanitarian international of enforcement and law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under responsibilities. States’ In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: (Pledge P182 and by the National Societies of Chile and Montenegro. J

Germany 8. oint pledge made by the governments of Germany, Greece, Monaco, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Poland, Serbia and Switzerland, ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 259

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: • • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Germany (continued) 260 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors. exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. Ghana Greece ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 261

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the additional protocols to the Geneva Conventions. to support states in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations. to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I. to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL the EU pledges: (Pledge P182) années les pour prenons nous présente, la Par de: encourager la l’engagement 2008-2011 reconnaissance, par les États, de la compétence de la Commission internationale humanitaire d’établissement des faits et, le cas échéant, encourager son utilisation par les parties à un armé. conflit Greece (continued) 262 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • (Pledge P1176) Represión de los crímenes de guerra y otras violaciones graves de DIH. Examinar y de ser necesario, adaptar la legislación internacionales obligaciones las a nacional penal impuestas al Estado por los instrumentos de humanitario.derecho internacional Adoptar medidas legislativas para incorporar a más los crímenes normativa nacional, penal la graves estipulados en el Estatuto de Roma y establecer un marco jurídico que permita la plena cooperación Corte con la Internacional. Penal

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Honduras ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 263

Conferencia Internacional, así como de los

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 Desarrollar programas de enseñanza y de formación en el ámbito del DIH y de la justicia destinados internacional penal fiscales a juecesy civiles y militares. (Pledge 1181) Intercambio de información y notificación relativas a las medidas adoptadas para la aplicación de DIH a nivel nacional. Proporcionar Servicio al Asesoramiento de en DIH del Comité Internacional de la Cruz Roja (CICR), toda la información acerca de la legislación aplicación nacional su y práctica y para su inclusión en la base de datos del CICR sobre medidas de aplicación nacional (incluidas todas las medidas jurídicas y prácticas para la DIH). del aplicación y difusión promoción, Informar al CICR y presentar un informe a la próxima Conferencia Internacional de 2015 sobre el seguimiento dado a la Declaración y al Programa de Acción Humanitaria de la XXVIII contraídos definitivos y individuales compromisos XXXI la en Conferencia Internacional.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Honduras (continued) 264 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors. to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute;

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Hungary ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 265

to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Hungary (continued) 266 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • 27.5 million over the 27.5 €

25,000 to the ICC Fund Trust for the 6.5 million to the Justice, Law and Order 100,000 to the ICC Fund Trust for Victims; 150,000 to the Special Court for Sierra A T A € € Participation Least of Developed Countries; € Leone; € Sector in Uganda ( period 2010–2014).

1. international criminal justice and the rule of law s part of its continuing support for financial amongst others, following the make, to contributions by end 2010: • • • • 2. domestic legislation implementing Ireland’s o promote awareness of the ICC and discussion ICC-related including of by issues in meetings of the National Committee on International Humanitarian Law and the Department of Foreign Affairs NGO Committee on Human Rights commencing autumn 2010. 3. Ireland aligns itself with the European Union’s s a Member State of the European Union, Conference. Review the for pledges Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Ireland ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 267

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: • • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Ireland (continued) 268 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • II,

T T

1. its cooperation with International the Criminal o adopt national policies in view to enforce Court (ICC), in particular in contributing to arrest operations and the execution of arrest warrants requested by the ICC. achieve this To goal it will be created, in the Ministry of Justice in Rome, Generale Direzione the Contenziosowithin e Diritti Umani, a specific office called Ufficio directly responsible matters in related with judicial promoting and assistance, extradition, surrender, promulgation or legislation national adoption of the of internal regulations and procedures, linked with the ICC. 2. the fight against impunity, spreading knowledge o adopt national policies directed towards about international criminal law and promoting the ICC and its Statute, more particularly through a number of workshop and international conferences to be held in Italy, with the support of the Italian Government. Among these initiatives: 1) an international conference will be held already in September, at the Istituto Superiore Internazionale Scienze Criminali di (ISISC), founded by Prof. Bassioumi in Siracusa (in the south of Italy) followed by; 2) workshop in Rome (in the center of Italy) at the University “Roma 3” on the Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the ICC in Kampala and; 3) by a seminar on the same subject, which will be held at the University (in of Trento the north of Italy) before the end of the present year. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Italy ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 269

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

(Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • •

T

3. the mainstreaming of ICC support, and to create, o adopt national policies directed towards within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Rome, a national focal point with the ICC in The Hague, and the Secretariat of the Assembly of States Parties (ASP) of the ICC, in its Department, called “Contenzioso Diplomatico.” The focal point will receive all relevant information, questions, requests from the ICC and the ASP and will forward them in a direct and expeditious way to the competent offices within the national administration. The focal point will also provide the Italian Government, with all necessary information for the enforcement of Court decisions, for the support of the ICC activities in international the fora, and promoting regional the adoption of national legislation or of international regulations, in favour of the ICC and its judicial activities. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Italy (continued) 270 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Japan ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 271

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Latvia 272 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • •

T T T

1. implementation of the Rome Statute, beyond o make further steps for the full domestic the explicit criminalization of genocide in the Liechtenstein Penal Code (Section 321) and the 2004 Law on Cooperation with the International CourtCriminal Other and International Tribunals, with a view to including specific provisions on war crimes and crimes against humanity in the CodePenal next the within two years. 2. Victims (TFV) through voluntary contributionso continue to support the ICC Fund Trust for (2011: CHF10,000). 3. International Criminal Court (CICC) througho continue to support the Coalition for the voluntary contributions. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Liechtenstein ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 273

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Lithuania 274 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Luxembourg ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 275

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors. exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Madagascar Mali 276 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Malta ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 277

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • (Pledge P1288) Impulsar adopción la medidas de legislativas para cumplir con los compromisos de México aún pendientes en materia de derecho internacional humanitario y del Estatuto de Roma Corte la de Internacional. Penal

C R L C

1. de la Organización de los Estados Americanos, presentandoontinuar Asamblea la en General el proyecto y 2012, en 2011 2010, de resolución “Promoción Corte la de Internacional”, Penal colaborando activamente con otros Estados en dicha iniciativa para promover la universalidad e implementación del Estatuto de Roma. 2. trabajos activos de la Comisión Intersecretarial los y 2012, ontinuar, en 2011 2010, de derecho internacional humanitario de México (CIDIH-México). En materia de seguimiento del proceso de implementación del Estatuto de Roma a nivel nacional. 3. un2010, seminario para dar a conocer el trabajo levar a cabo, durante el segundo semestre de corte la de funcionarios entre gubernamentales, gubernamentalesno académicos, y con especial énfasis en los resultados de la conferencia de revisión particular en y ejercicio el de evaluación internacional. penal justicia la de 4. con funcionarios seminario un gubernamentales, ealizar, durante el primer semestre de 2011, legisladores, poder del miembros judicial, expertos académicos y organizaciones de la sociedad civil, a fin de profundizar sobre los avances y retos de la implementación del Estatuto de Roma en México, con especial procesoénfasis el en armonización de legislativa. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) (Pledge P024) Encourage the adoption of legislation enabling Mexico to fulfil its outstanding commitments regarding IHL and the Rome Statute of the International Court. Criminal Mexico 278 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • •

P P

5. mandatodel Comité del Jurídico Interamericano enromover, junio de la 2010, renovación de la OEA para la elaboración de una legislación modelo en materia de implementación del Estatuto de Roma para los Estados miembros de la OEA, y apoyar los trabajos del comite tendientes a dicha elaboración a lo largo de y 2011. 2010 6. durante el primer un semestre proyecto de 2011, resentar ante el Congreso de la Unión, para código federal, al penal enmiendas de armonizarlo con las disposiciones del Estatuto de Roma de la Corte Penal Internacional en lo referente a los crímenes de su competencia. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

ncourager la : e

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 2008-2011 l’engagement de reconnaissance, par les États, de la compétence de la Commission internationale humanitaire d’établissement des faits et, le cas échéant, encourager son utilisation par les parties à un armé. conflit (Pledge P182) années les pour prenons nous présente, la Par Mexico (continued) Monaco ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 279

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • •

50,000. 25,000 per year. T I T

1. implementation of the ICC principle of o continue to support effective aimed initiatives supporting by complementarity capacity national enhancing and at investigate to prosecute the crimes of the Rome Statute, such as the ICC Legal Project Tools and the Justice (JRR). initiative Response Rapid 2. pledges to support from the to 2010 2013 n this context, the Netherlands hereby ICC Legal Project Tools and activities of its financial structural a with Partners Outsourcing € of contribution 3. support JRR efforts by hosting and supporting a he Netherlands pledges moreover to certification course at the Netherlands Forensic Institute in June and 2010 by supporting the JRR Secretariat with € Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P182) années les pour prenons nous présente, la Par la d’encourager l’engagement 2008-2011 reconnaissance, par les États, de la compétence de la Commission internationale humanitaire d’établissement des faits et, le cas échéant, encourager son utilisation par les parties à un armé. conflit (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Montenegro Netherlands 280 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

(Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • 40,000 and and 40,000

I T T N

4. a legal expert meeting in a yet-to-be confirmed he Netherlands further pledges to organize State Party on the in 2011 investigation and prosecution of international crimes in national jurisdictions. 5. for Victims, which address the harm resulting o support the activities of the Fund Trust from crimes under the jurisdiction of the ICC, by assisting victims to return to a dignified and contributory life within their communities. 6. pledges to make a financial contributionn this to context,the the Netherlands hereby FundTrust for Victims of in 2010 € States Parties consider other to encourages financial support for the Fund. 1. proposal to the Court for an agreement on the orway hereby pledges to submit a June 2010. 1 sentences, by enforcement of Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

ncourager la : e

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 2008-2011 l’engagement de reconnaissance, par les États, de la compétence de la Commission internationale humanitaire d’établissement des faits et, le cas échéant, encourager son utilisation par les parties à un armé. conflit (Pledge P182) années les pour prenons nous présente, la Par Netherlands (continued) Norway ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 281

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 Zealand national

Zealand to be the New

T T T T

1. especially in the Asia Pacific region, to promote o continue to work actively with other States, ratification and implementation of the Rome Statute. 2. activities in the Pacific region concerning the o continue to undertake technical assistance Rome Statute, including through the Pacific Islands Law Officers’ Network. 3. of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of and Trade o designate the Director of the Legal Division New coordination. for contact point 4. Secretariat in promoting expansion of Rome o support the work of the Commonwealth Statute Commonwealth among membership countries. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) New ZealandNew 282 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • •

E E

1. con lo establecido en el Estatuto de Roma de la l Perú se compromete, de conformidad del antes Corte realizar, Internacional, a Penal las2013, gestiones internas conducentes para la elaboración de las propuestas legislativas que permitan implementación la legislación de la que tipifique los crímenes contenidos en los artículos y 8, del Estatuto 5, 6, 7, de Roma de la Corte Internacional; Penal cuenta tomando en este último caso, se compromete también a implementar lo establecido en los cuatro Convenios de Ginebra de 1949 y el Protocolo Adicional I de 1977. 2. el con concernidas entidades y sectores los l Perú se compromete a coordinar con Congreso de la República a fin de coadyuvar en el proceso de aprobación del Acuerdo de Privilegios e Inmunidades de la Corte Penal Internacional (2011-2012). Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

oncluido dicho proceso, C

Conferencia Internacional de la Cruz Roja

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) XXX y de la Media Luna Roja, el Estado peruano considera en esta oportunidad formular la promesassiguientes iniciativas materia de en normativas implementación: su y Impulsar el ya iniciado proceso de perfeccionamiento Protocolo los del a adicional Convenios de Ginebra de agosto del 12 de 1949 relativo a la aprobación de un signo distintivo adicional (Protocolo III), de 7 de diciembre de 2005 y del Protocolo sobre restos explosivas de guerra (Protocolo V) (CCW.P.V), de 28 de noviembre de 2003. procederá a evaluar la mejor forma de lograr su aplicación a través de la adopción de las medidas administrativas y/o legislativas que resulten necesarias. (Pledge P104) Dado el estado de concreción de las promesas formuladas por el Perú en el 2003 y tomando en cuenta los temas que concitan la atención de la comunidad internacional con ocasión de la Peru ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 283

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1

E E

3. promocionando el respeto y vigencia del Estatuto l Perú se compromete a continuar de Roma así como de las normas del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos y de las normas de derecho internacional humanitario, conexas a dicho Estatuto, y difundiendo la labor de la Corte Penal International. Asimismo, se compromete a realizar, durante el período 2010-2013, actividades para la sensibilización capacitacióny de funcionarios autoridades y competentes, así como de la sociedad civil, materias. estas sobre 4. con lo establecido en el Estatuto de Roma l Perú se compromete, de conformidad Corte la de Internacional Penal los cuatro Convenios de Ginebra de 1949 y sus Protocolos Adicionales a realizar, antes del 2013, de 1977, las gestiones internas conducentes para a la adopción de medidas nacionales de aplicación que permitan regular adecuadamente el uso y protección del emblema de la Cruz Roja y otros signos protectores mencionados en el Estatuto de Roma. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 1976. dispuesto Como lo con comprometido país en el Estatuto de Roma de la Corte Penal Internacional, continuar con los esfuerzas orientados a la aprobación del proyecto de ley titulado “Ley de los delitos contra el Derecho Internacional del los Derechos Humanos y el Derecho Internacional Humanitario como una forma de adecuar la legislación interna a los delitos previstos en el mencionado Estatuto. Luego de la adhesión del Perú al Convención sobre Armas Biológicos y Toxínicas de 1972, el Estado peruano continuara trabajando en la elaboración de un proyecto de norma legislativa para implementar la Convención. En materia de armas químicas, impulsara la aprobación del proyecto actualmente de ley, en el Congreso de la Republica, sobre “Medias de control de sustancias químicas susceptibles de empleo para la fabricación de armas químicas”, el cual prevé sanciones administrativas para las infracciones vinculadas a las listas de sustancias químicas y sus precursores, incluidos en la Convención sobre la materia de 1993. Evaluar la posibilidad de suscribir la Convención sobre la prohibición de utilizar técnicas de modificación ambiental con fines militares u otros fines hostiles (ENMOD)10 de diciembre de Peru (continued) 284 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1

E E

5. organizaciones las incluidas partes interesadas, l Perú se compromete a trabajar con otras la en subregionales, y regionales internacionales aplicación del régimen de complementariedad previsto en el Estatuto de Roma. En particular, el Perú se compromete a continuar apoyando las importantes iniciativas impulsadas desde la Organización de los Estados Americanos (OEA) respecto a la cooperación de los Estados Miembros de la OEA con la Corte, así como la implementación del Estatuto de Roma de Cortela Internacional Penal dentro los de ordenamientos internos los Estados. de Apoyar la aprobación de resoluciones de las organizaciones pertinentes, internacionales en particular de la OEA y sus Estados Miembros relativas al fomento de la plena efectividad del Estatuto de Roma (2010-2013). 6. activamente durante la Asamblea de Estados l Perú se compromete a asistir y participar Partes Corte la de Internacional. Penal Prever los recursos presupuestales y humanos que permitan la participación del Perú en la Asamblea de Estados Partes de la Corte Penal Internacional. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) En tanto Estado parte de la Convención sobre Ciertas Armas Convencionales de 1980 y sus Protocolos I, II, III, y IV, el Perú evaluara la mejor forma de adoptar las medidas necesarias para la aplicación de dichos Instrumentos. En lo que respecta a la implementación de lo dispuesto en la Convención de Ottawa sobre Minas Antipersonal, luego de la creación y reglamentación de CONTRAMINAS así como la adopción las medidas de legislativas pertinentes para sancionar las conductas contrarias al espíritu de la Convención, las Fuerzas Armadas y la Policía Nacional procedieron a la destrucción de casi la totalidad de minas antipersonal almacenadas. En esta nueva etapa continuará trabajando conjuntamente con las instituciones acciones determinar para concernidas especificas en beneficio de las victimas de las minas antipersonal, sobre todo para aquellas de condicion civil en mayor nivel de vulnerabilidad. Peru (continued) ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 285

) 9 exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

Republic of Poland and its National Red Cross Society (Polish Red Cross) have a long-standing partnership in the promotion, dissemination and implementation of international humanitarian law, and recognize the importance of such activities at the national level. (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • (Pledge P1183 ) – in accordance with

T T T

1. to this aim to complete, as quickly as feasible, o implement fully the Rome Statute, and processthe the introducing amendments to of Polish Criminal Code, which will complement the existing legislation, with a view to reflect fully crime of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statute. 2. in the European Union to promote universality o continue to work actively with our partners and integrity of the Rome Statute, in particular in those countries which are not yet parties to the Statute (so-called “ICC clauses” in EU countries, third with concluded agreements raising the issue in the EU political dialogues making countries, those with negotiations and EUrelevant démarches the Common Position of the Union (2001/443/ 2003/444/CFSP) and 2002/474/CFSP CFSP, as well as to achieve this goals through bilateral State-parties. non with cooperation 3. implementation process of the Rome Statute o continue to follow efficiently the by the relevant national authorities, including in the framework of the National Committee on International Humanitarian Law. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: (Pledge P182) années les pour prenons nous présente, la Par de: encourager la l’engagement 2008-2011 reconnaissance, par les États, de la compétence de la Commission internationale humanitaire d’établissement des faits et, le cas échéant, encourager son utilisation par les parties à un armé. conflit J

Poland 9. oint pledge by the Government and National Society of Poland. 286 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

In this connection, Republic of Poland and its National Red Cross, in the light of the forthcoming celebrations to mark the 150th anniversary of Geneva Convention adoption original the the of pledgein 2014, to work together to explore the feasibility of establishing a practical reporting mechanism measures on taken the national at international implement to humanitarianlevel Suchlaw. a mechanism would take into account existing processes.relevant (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • •

T T T

4. contribution to the Fund Trust for Victims up to o continue making every year voluntary budgetarythe constraints. 5. contribution to the Fund Trust for the o continue making every year voluntary participation of the least developed countries and other developing States in the sessions of the Assembly of States Parties up to the budgetary constraints. 6. criminal justice issues in the domestic system of strengthen internationalo mainstreaming the higher education, in particular at law faculties the universities.of Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

ICC.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) the (Pledge P347) weFor hereby the pledge: years 2007-2011, adopting appropriate legislation in order to incorporate the core crimes under the Statute into domestic law and as well as implementing legislation to permit full cooperation with Poland (continued) ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 287

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors. to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute;

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Portugal 288 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it. exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • 10

T T

1. programmes for those in the sector of criminal o provide education and training justice in other countries during the second half of with 2010, a view to helping them to jurisdictional strengthen criminal national their capacity and thus enhancing the principle of complementarity the Rome of Statute. 2. the International Criminal Court in order to assist o provide a voluntary financial contribution to its activities by the end of this year. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007)

I

Portugal (continued) Republic Republic of Korea 10. n consultation with the Court about the project/programme on which the contribution would have a greater impact. ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 289

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: (Pledge P182) années les pour prenons nous présente, la Par de: encourager la l’engagement 2008-2011 reconnaissance, par les États, de la compétence de la Commission internationale humanitaire d’établissement des faits et, le cas échéant, encourager son utilisation par les parties à un armé. conflit Romania Serbia 290 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

(Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at:

ICRC, civil society, international organizations T U

C O of permanent missions of Caribbean States to the United Nations in New York, aimed at promoting ratification and full implementation of the ICC Rome Statute by Caribbean States; and to New York University for wider dissemination of information about the ICC and its role among public, academia and civil society.

1. of States Parties for achieving universality and nder the Plan of Action of the Assembly full implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Court, Criminal to: a) onvene a regional seminar for legal experts b) rganize a conference in cooperation with the 2. with cooperation close in activities these he Slovak Republic will undertake representatives the of ICC, States, academia, the stakeholders. other and Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. Slovakia Slovenia ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 291

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • (Pledge P1210) The [State Party] hereby pledges to promote universal ratification or accession and effective implementation and enforcement of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict. The [National Society] hereby pledges to support its ensuring towards steps government by ratification or accession, if not already done, and effective implementation and enforcement of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict. The [National Society] also pledges to encourage ratificationits ensuring towards government or accession, if not already done, and effective implementation and enforcement of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed Conflict (Article 3 (2).

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Slovenia (continued) 292 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 Further, the [National Society] pledges to document the consequences of recruitment of persons under the by armed age of 18 forces and groups, and to encourage its government to adapt national legislation in order to prohibit the recruitment of persons under the age of 18 by all armed forces and groups and to ensure and prosecuted are responsible those that sanctioned. (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: • • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Slovenia (continued) ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 293

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors. to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute;

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge:

M P I

1. negociación acuerdo de un de reubicación de niciar con la Corte Penal Internacional la testigos. 2. Estatuto de Roma en sus relaciones bilaterales romover la universalidad e integridad del a través de la realización de las oportunas gestiones diplomáticas a favor de la ratificación y mediante la inclusión de la Corte Penal Internacional en la agenda de los diálogos políticos permanentes, consonancia en con la posición común de la Unión Europea sobre la Corte Internacional. Penal 3. política de ayuda al desarrollo española la antener como prioridad sectorial de la gobernabilidad democrática y la construcción de la paz que se traduzcan en objetivos específicos tendentes al fortalecimiento del acceso a la justicia y de las capacidades institucionales y sociales para la resolución pacífica de los conflictos así como el apoyo de las reformas estructurales que desarrollen el estado de derecho, contribuyendo así al buen funcionamiento de los principios de cooperación y complementariedad previstos en el Estatuto de Roma. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Spain 294 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it. exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties actors. interested other and

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • • (Pledge P1341) El Reino de España se compromete a: Continuar el procedimiento interno para ratificar las enmiendas del Estatuto de la Corte Penal Internacional adoptadas Conferencia la en de Revisión celebrada en Kampala en 2010. (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at:

M

4. Fondo Fiduciario en beneficio de las víctimas, antener financiación una plurianual del en forma de contribuciones voluntarias anuales, acordadas por el Gobierno de la Nación, hasta por lo menos el año 2012. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. Spain (continued) Sweden ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 295

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: Sweden (continued) 296 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

(Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • •

S A C A septembre 2002.

1. interne en vue de la ratification de l’Accord sur lancervant lala finprocédure de 2011, les privilèges et immunités de la Cour pénale internationale (APIC), signé par la Suisse le 10 2. législatives nécessaires à la mise en œuvre ssurer l’entrée en vigueur des modifications globale du Statut de Rome dans juridique l’ordre national. 3. en fonction des moyens à disposition, les États au niveauoutenir, technique et financier et faveur en gouvernementales non organisations et de la ratification universelle et de la mise en efficacedu Statut. œuvre 4. d’affectation spéciale au profit des victimes en ontribuer volontairement au Fonds disposition. à moyens des fonction Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) (Pledge P182) années les pour prenons nous présente, la Par de: encourager la l’engagement 2008-2011 reconnaissance, par les États, de la compétence de la Commission internationale humanitaire d’établissement des faits et, le cas échéant, encourager son utilisation par les parties à un armé. conflit Switzerland ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 297

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010) ,

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) the provision of training to members of the armed and national security forces, both in peace and war times. provideTo all members of the armed and adequate with security forces national information on the rights and professional principles journalists, of professionals media and associated personnel, including on the need to preserve independence. their serious for responsible those that ensure To violations of international humanitarian law journalists, professionals and against media and prosecuted are personnel associated impartial and competent before brought tribunals. (Pledge P315) take all To necessary stepsto ensure that civilian journalists, professionals media associated and personnel working in armed conflicts enjoy the respect and protection granted to civilians under international humanitarian law for so long as they are entitled to such respect and protection. promoteTo international humanitarian law principles and rules applicable to journalists, professionalsmedia associated and personnel working in armed conflicts through, alia inter Switzerland (continued) 298 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors. exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Tajikistan The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 299

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1

or other procedures required for non-States for required procedures other or Parties in the region to become adherents to Statute;the region its national legislation implementing the provisions of the Statute. This can be used as model legislation; on the Privileges and Immunities of the International Court Criminal (ICC). u m a D C T U

1. pledges to continue to promote the universality he Republic and of Trinidad hereby Tobago of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (“the Statute”) among Member States of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) which are not States Parties to the Statute. In order to achieve this objective, and Trinidad will: Tobago (i) se its initiative to advise on the ratification (ii) ake available to other States within the (iii) dvocate for the ratification of the Agreement 1. awareness on the activities of the ICC at national ndertake activities to promote increased level. 2. building on the Statute with the national judicial ommit to improve legal training and capacity system. education and 3. witness protection geared towards fulfilling evelopment of legislation on victim and Statute. the under obligations implementing Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Trinidad Tobago and Uganda 300 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties actors. interested other and

(Pledge P1026) undertake/pledgeWe that ensure to national our criminal law makes it possible to prosecute all serious international humanitarian violations of in accordancelaw, with our international obligations. 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • •

T

1. with full political and practical support, in o provide the International Criminal Court accordance with our Rome Statute obligations and our agreements signed with the Court on witness protection, sentence enforcement and information sharing; and to ensure that our authoritiesnational comply and comprehensively effectively to requests for assistance from the organs of the Court. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) (Pledge P042) Pledge on the International Criminal Court (ICC) The United Kingdom remains committed to ensuring that those who perpetrate genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes are held to account. welcome We all efforts to make significant advances in the fight against impunity and believe that our strong support for practical tribunals through international criminal cooperation, institutional assistance as well as through political support demonstrate this. We institutions the strengthening the that of believe themselves, especially achieving the widest possible jurisdiction for the ICC, to be a key aspect of our continued support for international criminal justice. Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (hereafter United Kingdom) ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 301

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

(Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes of including concern international the community, to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: 31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • •

T T

2. the victims of serious crimes, in particular to o play an active role in delivering justice to take measures to support the victims of sexual violence; and to seek to help victims re-establish their livelihoods, including by continuing our support for the Fund Trust for Victims. 3. pertinent legislation national relevant to o support States in their efforts to adopt their Rome Statute and wider international humanitarian law obligations; and to promote ratification and implementation of the Rome Statute within Commonwealth States, including the provision of support to revise the Commonwealth Model Law. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the InternationalCourt Criminal enforce orderto in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) • • • • For the years 2008–2011, we hereby pledge: to continue to encourage States to become party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and to put in place legislation to give the effect.Statute (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: United Kingdom (continued) 302 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at:

T T

1. a draft2011 law for the adoption of the o present to the Parliament by 30 December resolution for ratification of the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the International Criminal Court and adopting specific national measures implementing the Rome Statute by 30 December 2011. 2. 30 December 2011. o contribute to the Fund Trust for Victims by Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) United Republic Republic United Tanzania of Uruguay ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 303

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1240) Apoyar de forma activa la labor y el Comisión la Nacional de funcionamiento de Aplicación del Derecho Internacional Humanitario. Fomentar la difusión del derecho internacional humanitario (Convenios I, II, III, 48, IV, arts. 47, respectivamente) 144, 127, y avanzar en la identificación, registro y señalización de bienes culturales protegidos en caso de conflicto armado. todasTomar las medidas necesarias para permitir y facilitar el paso seguro, rápido y sin obstáculos del socorro humanitario a las poblaciones afectadas, incluyendo asistencia la nuestras con conformidad de sanitaria, derecho internacional el bajo obligaciones humanitario. nuestrasAsegurar de entrenamiento el que seguridad de fuerzas y armadas fuerzas incluya componentes específicos relativos a los derechos y necesidades particulares de las mujeres y las niñas, así como sobre la prohibición de toda forma de violencia, incluida la sexual. violencia

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Uruguay (continued) 304 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 Participar activamente Conferencia la en sobre el Tratado de Comercio de Armas en julio de 2012, con miras a elaborar un instrumento legalmente vinculante sobre los más altos estándares transferencia de para la comunes internacionales armas convencionales. Explorar e identificar las vías y los medios concretos para mejorar la aplicación del derecho internacional humanitario, incluyendo la cuestión de los mecanismos de implementación. Fortalecer el diálogo sobre las cuestiones humanitario derecho internacional de entre las Partes contratantes y los otros actores interesados.

L L

1. promete incorporar los crímenes contemplados a República Bolivariana de Venezuela en el Estatuto de Roma como delitos en la venezolana. penal legislación 2. la conocimiento, el promover a compromete a República Bolivariana de Venezuela se aplicación e implementación del Estatuto de Roma a través de jornadas de capacitación a funcionarios del Poder Público Nacional. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Uruguay (continued) Venezuela (Bolivarian of)Republic ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 305

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1

L L

3. compromete a dar la más amplia divulgación a República Bolivariana de Venezuela se al contenido del Estatuto de la Corte Penal Internacional y los crímenes en ella tipificados, así como a resaltar la importancia de la Corte en la lucha contra la impunidad de los crímenes más graves de trascendencia para la comunidad conjunto. su en internacional 4. se compromete a trabajar en el marco de la a República Bolivariana de Venezuela iniciativa regional “Alianza Bolivariana para los Pueblos de Nuestra América - Tratado de Comercio de los Pueblos (ALBA-TCP)”, a fin de promover la ratificación y adhesión del Estatuto de Roma de la Corte Penal Internacional por parte de los Estados que integran dicha Alianza que aún no lo hayan hecho, y fomentar con ello Corte la de universalidad la Internacional. Penal reaffirm pledgesZambia to hereby intention her to take steps to ratify/accede to the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the International Criminal Court. Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) Venezuela Venezuela (Bolivarian of)Republic (continued) Zambia 306 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference S

Angola II. tates not party to the Rome Statute and observers ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 307

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors. exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference (Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. Armenia Cyprus 308 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 • • • (Pledge P1311) CourtInternational Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes concernof international the community, to including war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the International Court Criminal enforce order to in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference • • • • Cyprus (continued) ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 309

to continue to promote the universality and preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute; to include the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of provisions concerning ICC the international justice and into EU agreements with third parties; to continue their support to the Court, civil society and to third States interested in receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1311) International Court Criminal The EU and its Member States consider that those who have committed serious crimes concernof international the community, to including war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of genocide should be brought to justice. In line with their efforts to fight impunity, the EU and its Member States pledge: • • • T T T T

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010) 1. preserve the integrity of the Rome Statute. o continue to promote the universality and 2. most serious crimes of international concern o include the fight against impunity for the as one of the shared values of the EU and its partners through the insertion of ICC and international justice-related its into provisions parties. third with agreements 3. civil society and to the third States interested in o continue its financial support to the Court, receiving assistance in order to become party to the Rome Statute or to implement it. 4. support of the Court following the Review o review and update its instruments in Conference.

to promote ratification of IHL conventions and in particular of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions; to support States in their efforts to adopt pertinent legislations national relevant the to IHL obligations; to support the existing IHL mechanisms such International the as Fact-Finding Commission foreseen in Article 90 of Additional Protocol I; to pursue its close cooperation with the International Court Criminal enforce order to in IHL and ensure repression of grave breaches of IHL.

(Pledge P089) The EU is convinced that national implementation enforcement and international of humanitarian law (IHL) are of great importance and fall under States’ responsibilities. In line with the 2005 EU guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL, the EU pledges: of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference • • • • European Union European 310 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors. exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Lao People’s Democratic Republic Morocco ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 311

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • •

T T

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010) 1. to support rule-of-law and capacity building he United States renews its commitment projects which will enhance States’ ability to war for responsible those accountable hold crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. 2. Obama’s recognition on 25 May that 2010 we he United States reaffirms President commitments our strengthen and renew must our capabilities to protect and assist civilians caught in the LRA’s wake, to receive those that surrender, and to support efforts to bring the LRA leadership to justice.

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference America

Palestine of United States 312 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

e

4 relatif à la répression relatif la 4 à des violations

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1321) Les Autorités belges et la Croix-Rouge de Belgique prennent acte du Plan d’action quadriennal pour la mise en œuvre du droit XXXI la à présenté international humanitaire Conférence internationale de la Croix-Rouge et du Croissant-Rouge (2011), en particulier son objectif international droit humanitaire. du graves Dans le cadre de cet objectif, les Autorités belges, en collaboration avec la Croix-Rouge de Belgique, continueront d’accorder une attention particulière à la diffusion du droit international humanitaire auprès des acteurs judiciaires, avocats et magistrats, en raison de leur rôle central dans la poursuite et la répression des violations graves de ce droit. Conformément à l’obligation des États de diffuser le droit international humanitaire, telle que prévue par les Conventions de Genève leurs Protocoles et 1949 de additionnels, les Autorités belges, en collaboration avec la Croix- Rouge de Belgique, poursuivront l’organisation de séances de diffusion du droit international humanitaire de à l’aide supports adéquats auprès des acteurs judiciaires.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference N

Belgium III. ational Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 313

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference (Pledge P291) continueTo to reaffirm the importance of international humanitarian norms through Canada’s ICC and Accountability Campaign, which supports projects designed to promote the effective operation International the of Criminal Court and other accountability mechanisms. continueTo to focus on targeted and cost- effective technical legal assistance, capacity building, education and outreach, particularly in States and among populations most affected by the crimes being considered. Botswana Canada 314 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

To continueTo to encourage the widespread ratification and implementation of the Rome Statute of the ICC, with a view to ending the culture of impunity for serious violations of international humanitarian law. (Pledge P296) promoteTo safe and unhindered humanitarian access to individuals and communities in need, and support measures or initiatives that improve the safety of humanitarian workers. encourageTo greater coordination among agencies on security management issues, appropriate of implementation promote procedures and training for national and international staff and support research related to their safety and security. promoteTo ratification and respect of relevant justice to bringing international treaties, including personnel. humanitarian attack who those (Pledge P182) années les pour prenons nous présente, la Par de: encourager la l’engagement 2008-2011 reconnaissance, par les États, de la compétence de la Commission internationale humanitaire d’établissement des faits et, le cas échéant, encourager son utilisation par les parties à un armé. conflit of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Chile Canada (continued) ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 315

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1163) Nous nous engageons à (continuer de) soutenir de actions ses dans gouvernement notre diffusion international droit humanitaire du des droit, du professionnels des auprès membres du ministère public et des juges, notamment. (Pledge P1167) Nous nous engageons, en tant que membres des Commissions nationales de mise en œuvre au aider à international droit humanitaire, du dans incorporer à gouvernements nos besoin leur droit interne les violations graves du droit international conformément humanitaire, notre à rôle d’auxiliaires des pouvoirs publics dans le domaine humanitaire.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Congo 316 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

ans a mis en veilleuse ces projets. Nous nous

(Pledge P059) Depuis 1996, année de la création de la Commission nationale de mise en œuvre du DIH en Côte d’Ivoire, beaucoup d’initiatives ont été prises, notamment dans les domaines de la formation et des échanges avec les autres pays. Nous nous réjouissons de la détermination du Gouvernement dans la poursuite et l’atteinte des objectifs visant la mise en œuvre du DIH en Côte d’Ivoire. La Commission a déjà travaillé à la préparation des textes législatifs sur l’adoption de mesures pénales contre les infractions graves au droit international humanitaire et la protection de Lel’emblème. conflit armé qui dure depuis of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference 5 engageons à soutenir tous les efforts de la Commission en ce sens. Côte d’Ivoire Côte ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 317

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1210) The [State Party] hereby pledges to promote universal ratification or accession and effective implementation and enforcement of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict. The [National Society] hereby pledges to support its ensuring towards steps government by ratification or accession, if not already done, and effective implementation and enforcement of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict. The [National Society] also pledges to encourage its ensuring towards government ratification or accession, if not already done, and effective implementation and enforcement of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict (Article 3 (2)). Further, the [National Society] pledges to document the consequences of recruitment of persons under the by armed age of 18 forces and groups, and to encourage its government to adapt national legislation in order to prohibit the recruitment of persons under the age of 18 by all armed forces and groups and to ensure and prosecuted are responsible those that sanctioned.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Denmark 318 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1043) undertake/pledgeWe to assist our government, where appropriate, in our capacity as members of our National International Humanitarian Law serious of incorporation the in Commission, violations of international humanitarian law into the domestic legal orders, in accordance with our role as auxiliaries to the public authorities in the humanitarian field. P1400) (Pledge années les pour prenons nous présente, la Par l’engagement suivant:2012-2015 Nous nous proposer à engageons du professionnels aux droit et personnels agissant en milieu carcéral une offre de formation au droit international La international droit pénal. et humanitaire Croix-Rouge française apportera son soutien à la réalisation de formations et de sensibilisations.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference France ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 319

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • (Pledge P1155) Soutien de la Croix-Rouge haïtienne au Projet de résolution 31IC/11/5.1.3DR sur l’adoption et la DIH. du œuvre quadriennal Plan en du mise dites certaines zones années, plusieurs Depuis de non-droit en Haïti sont souvent le théâtre de conflits armés entre bandes rivales, ou entre militaires démobilisés et membres de groupes politiques adverses. Ces conflits entraînent des atteintes graves à l’intégrité physique des populations civiles, qui sont souvent prises en otage par les parties aux combats.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Gambia Haiti 320 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

e

:

:

à p à f à e à f curriculums de formation de l’école de la magistrature, des écoles de droit et de l’académie de police et des forces armées, une fois celles-ci ré-instituées. des membres du ministère public et des professionnels du droit, à travers le Bâtonnat Port-au-Prince. haïtien. basées sur le genre, en mettant l’accent sur déplacées, personnes les sur exercées celles les femmes et les enfants notamment.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 La Croix-Rouge haïtienne estime hautement important de soutenir et de fait déclare, ici, soutenir la résolution de la XXXI 5.1.3DR Conférence internationale de la Croix-Rouge et du Croissant-Rouge, portant sur l’adoption et la mise en œuvre du Plan d’action quadriennal du DIH. La Croix-Rouge s’engage haïtienne spécifiquement 1) romouvoir l’intégration du DIH dans les 2) aire la diffusion du DIH auprès des juges, 3) n assurer la diffusion auprès du Parlement Elle aussi s’engage 4) aire de la sensibilisation sur les violences

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Haiti (continued) ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 321

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors. exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Madagascar Monaco 322 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

(Pledge P182) années les pour prenons nous présente, la Par de: encourager la l’engagement 2008-2011 reconnaissance, par les États, de la compétence de la Commission internationale humanitaire d’établissement des faits et, le cas échéant, encourager son utilisation par les parties à un armé. conflit of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Philippines Montenegro ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 323

promote and advocate the fundamental principles, humanitarian values, and basics of IHL, as well as its domestic legislation, as wide as possible targeting priority audiences and areas affected by armed conflict; the of use proper the promote protect and Movement’s recognized emblem; care for and constantly ensure the safety and welfare of its personnel to better deliver various humanitarian services to those in need; initiate and influence the formation of the Philippine IHL Council composed of government, Philippine Red Cross, the academia, private sector, NGOs and other groups that can help further IHL goals and objectives in the Philippines; work fully within the confines of its mandate in order to function effectively in the provision of interventions; and response humanitarian work to integrate IHL principles, humanitarian values and basics, as well as local IHL legislation, into university and law school curricula, as well as into local bar examinations.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1382) For the we years hereby pledge 2012-2015, to: • • • • • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Philippines (continued) 324 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1183) Republic of Poland and its National Red Cross Society (Polish Red Cross) have a long-standing partnership in the promotion, dissemination and implementation international of humanitarian andlaw, recognize the importance of such activities at the national level. In this connection, Republic of Poland and its National Red Cross, in the light of the forthcoming celebrations to mark the 150th anniversary of the adoption of the original Geneva Convention pledge in 2014, to work together to explore the feasibility of establishing a practical reporting mechanism on measures taken at the national level to implement international humanitarian Such law. a mechanism would take into account relevant processes. existing (Pledge P1044) undertake/pledgeWe to (continue to) support our government in the dissemination of international humanitarian law to legal prosecutors judges. and including professionals,

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Poland Romania ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 325

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors. exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • • • (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at:

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Sierra Leone Sierra Slovakia 326 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • (Pledge P1210) The [State Party] hereby pledges to promote universal ratification or accession and effective implementation and enforcement of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict. The [National Society] hereby pledges to support its ensuring towards steps government by ratification or accession, if not already done, and effective implementation and enforcement of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Slovenia ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 327

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 The [National Society] also pledges to encourage its ensuring towards government ratification or accession, if not already done, and effective implementation and enforcement of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict (Article 3 (2)). Further, the [National Society] pledges to document the consequences of recruitment of persons under the by armed age of 18 forces and groups, and to encourage its government to adapt national legislation in order to prohibit the recruitment of persons under the age of 18 by all armed forces and groups and to ensure and prosecuted are responsible those that sanctioned. P1345) (Pledge La Cruz Roja Española formula la promesa de promover formación la derecho en internacional, derecho internacional en especialmente de internacional, penal humanitario justicia y los profesionales de la justicia, en particular de los miembros del Poder Judicial, jueces, magistrados y fiscales, así como de los para Abogados, de Colegios los de letrados que incorporen a sus conocimientos las normas aplicables a los conflictos armados.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Slovenia (continued) Spain 328 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • • (Pledge P1043) undertake/pledgeWe to assist our government, where appropriate, in our capacity as members of our National International Humanitarian Law serious of incorporation the in Commission, violations of international humanitarian law into the domestic legal orders, in accordance with our role as auxiliaries to the public authorities in the humanitarian field.

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Sweden Suriname ANNEXE 9 : LIST OF PLEDGES 329

exploring and identifying concrete ways and means to strengthen the application of international humanitarian including law, the question implementation of mechanisms; international on dialogue reinforcing humanitarian law issues among High Contracting Parties and other interested actors.

31st International Conference 31st of the Red Cross and Red Crescent December(28 2011) November–1 (Pledge P1096) In accordance with its announcement made at the Conference of the 60th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions, Depositary the undertakes to facilitate a process with the High Contracting Parties and in collaboration with the ICRC, aiming at: • •

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala (31 June May–11 2010)

of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (26–30 November 2007) 30th International Conference Trinidad Tobago and 10. CONCLUDING STATEMENT BY MR YVES SANDOZ, MEMBER OF THE ICRC AND FORMER ICRC DIRECTOR OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND PRINCIPLES 332 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

Ladies and gentlemen, dear friends,

I am delighted to open this final session and to do so in this room, where the Additional Protocols were negotiated over 30 years ago, and in which, incidentally, I recognize several of the participants in the process at the time – the “veterans” of international humanitarian law.

But it is also a pleasure to see these “veterans” surrounded by today’s movers and shakers, to perceive the energy invested in maintaining and applying these bitterly negoti- ated rules. A positive atmosphere has prevailed at this meeting, an atmosphere of listening, of empathy, and of mutual understanding, which is very encouraging. So often, at international conferences, there is a tug of war, with groups at each end pulling in opposite directions. In this case, everyone was pulling on the same end of the rope. The question was not whether to do or not to do some- thing, but how to do it better, and the differences focused not so much on the objective as on the best means of achieving it.

We could not have imagined in 1977 that international justice would make such great strides, nor would we have dared to hope that half the countries in the world would establish national committees for the implementation of international humanitarian law, the better to fulfil their obligations under it. The growth in these last few years has been remarkable. It is true, however, that while no one at the time foresaw the end of the Cold War, neither did anyone think that genocides would happen again, that millions of people would again be victims of the worst atrocities.

There is a new impetus, therefore, for better enforcement of humanitarian law, reflecting a new determination to counter impunity. But there are also still enormous needs, and there is an obligation to work unstintingly to improve the situation of war victims. ANNEX 10 : CONCLUDING STATEMENT 333

This meeting is part of that effort.

A number of objectives were set for it, as reflected in the documentation that everyone has received, and they were mentioned at the start of the meeting, so I am not going to read them out again. Moreover, these objectives were dis- cussed in the working groups, which were the subject of excellent reports, and their very useful conclusions were reported and discussed in plenary sessions. These conclu- sions, in turn, are part of the results of this meeting and will be communicated to you in the report. Therefore, I do not intend to repeat them all here, but I should like to make several somewhat more general comments on them based on our meeting as a whole.

In the first place, this meeting had an educational objective, which was especially relevant since the Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has just been revised and it is important to consider the consequences of this for implementation.

Many examples have convinced us all (or nearly all – I do not mean to be too categorical) of the advisability of what has been described as the “integrated approach”, consisting of the incorporation of serious violations of humanitarian law into domestic law. We were given a very convincing explanation of this. If one really wishes to strengthen the application of humanitarian law, there must be clear rules at the national level and these rules must, above all, be consistent with the constitution, even if this means adapting it. In particular, handing over of nationals to an international court, the question of immunities and the principle of legality can cause problems and require such adaptation.

It is therefore necessary to begin by making a list of all the obligations deriving from humanitarian law, and then to harmonize them with those deriving from national law, in order to spare judges from having to search through a vast number of instruments for instructions that may be difficult 334 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

to understand and that must sometimes be reconciled with one another. Hence, it is a matter of adding the breaches of humanitarian law that are not covered by national law and clarifying those which are covered, but in a different manner. Breaches which derive not from treaty obligations but from customary international law must also be included. Think, for example, about the fundamental question of serious violations of humanitarian law committed during non-international armed conflicts, which were not consid- ered as war crimes under the regime of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, nor under that of the 1977 Additional Protocols, but which became war crimes through the development of case-law that was later confirmed by the Rome Statute.

In short, coherence, simplification and clarity are the key words which justify an “integrated approach” as it has been defined, and I believe that I sensed a genuine consensus in that regard, even if there may still be slight differences over the means of achieving it.

Furthermore, in line with the current trend towards coun- tering impunity, we must clearly define the obligation of States to exercise their power of universal jurisdiction and thus take part in countering impunity not only in their own countries, but as members of the international community. This is part of the contribution that each country makes towards the universal objective of countering impunity, and in any case, for those countries that are parties to the Rome Statute, it is a fitting complement to the relationship that must be established with the ICC. The power of uni- versal jurisdiction must indeed be exercised within a well- defined framework and in a predictable manner, in order to avoid the controversy that has surrounded it on several occasions.

Our meeting has, I think, confirmed that there is more than one way of incorporating humanitarian law into national law. Several parallel courts, or courts at different levels, can ANNEX 10 : CONCLUDING STATEMENT 335

have jurisdiction. In this regard, the question of the re- spective merits of civilian and military courts can, of course, be reconsidered, and this question has been broached without having been settled. What everyone agrees on is that these courts must be independent, competent, effective and equitable.

In a nutshell, the objective of coherence, clarity and sim- plicity remains valid regardless of the system. There is unquestionably an essential role here for the national humanitarian law committees in avoiding any waste of energy and maximizing the efficiency of the available resources, especially since these resources are often insufficient.

Efficiency also implies good training for those who have to apply the law, starting with judges. Yet it is clear that recent changes in the rules of international humanitarian law, and international criminal law in particular, as a result of new conventions or the revision of existing ones, as well as developments in customary law and the clarifications pro- vided by the case-law of the international tribunals and expert studies – all of this has to be absorbed and, I should say, mastered by judges. The national committees should not only mention this; they should also contribute to this effort, either directly or by encouraging the establishment of training tools and coordination among those that exist.

But the committees can do this only if they have all the requisite skills, and this is obviously one of their concerns. Another concern is ensuring that representatives of all the ministries involved in this effort participate in the national humanitarian law committees, and that each ministry has staff who are really competent in this area.

In order for all of this to work, there must still be adequate resources, and therefore a real political will to make these resources available. In this sense, the national committees have a role not only in identifying the resources needed for 336 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

them to function well, but also in persuading politicians to make them available.

Now, the message sent to politicians can be effective only if the population itself is aware of the importance of this work and supports its objectives. This role of explanation, of spreading knowledge, is therefore essential if the national committees are to be supported and, above all, if the effort to counter impunity is to be well understood and accepted. For the national committees themselves, this means having a real communication strategy, and stressing in their con- tacts with the government the importance of its having such a strategy as part of its general obligation to promote humanitarian law among the population.

What has also emerged from this meeting, it seems to me, is that the debate must be opened further, in order to be well understood, the effort to counter impunity must be placed in a still broader context, that of protecting people against violations of humanitarian law and aiding war victims. And, as we have seen, this is a real challenge. Of course, the sen- tencing of criminals is a form of compensation – this has been stressed – but it is not sufficient if the victim is in other respects left alone without any support, if the victim has the impression that the criminal is treated better than he or she is. If we want the anti-impunity campaign to be well under- stood, we cannot separate it from the effort that must also be made in the area of compensation. I should even go further: in contexts like that of Rwanda or other situations, in which the victims number in the hundreds of thousands, one cannot approach the issue of individual compensation without placing it in the still broader context of reconstruc- tion, development assistance and social justice.

The international criminal tribunals have well understood this, as was explained to us in connection with the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). The ICTR believes that it is vital not only to carry out its legal work, but to explain it, and to support the Rwandan courts in ANNEX 10 : CONCLUDING STATEMENT 337

maintaining and better understanding the essential com- plementarity between international and national courts. The very phrase “international courts”, their location and their composition have been and continue to be the subject of criticism: the importance of proximity and of involving the people concerned, the different systems, in which local judges rub shoulders with international judges – all of this fuels such criticism, which of course focuses mainly on concern with the proper rendering of justice, but also on the reception, the understanding and the ownership of such justice by the population.

In recent years, criticism has also focused on the penalty, for if punishment is an important signal, the type and severity of the penalty is one as well. I am not going to summarize here the vast work on the penalty that has been undertaken in the past few years and that was, in particular, the subject of an issue of the International Review of the Red Cross; nor will I go over the discussions at our meeting, which have been very rich in this regard. But as someone pointed out during the meeting, the choice and severity of the sentences, the possibility of preventive financial penal- ties, the relationship between disciplinary penalties and criminal penalties, the immediacy of the penalty, the establishment of the facts and, to that end, the protection of victims and other witnesses – all of this is now better understood and taken into account, but it still leaves open big issues and, therefore, big challenges.

International criminal justice, which symbolizes this new energy for countering impunity that we see emerging, has become a locomotive, but it has to pull behind it the “wagons” of compensation, development and solidarity among peoples. This is why it is important to support it. But in order for international criminal justice to be understood and accepted, the other wagons must remain connected to the train – and we have not even talked about the need to find a balance between pacification, reconciliation and punishment. As has been emphasized, no genuine 338 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

reconciliation is possible if major criminals, war criminals, go unpunished in a so-called spirit of conciliation.

Each situation is unique, however, and while we can infer a few principles, such as the one I have just mentioned, the balance that needs to be found remains very elusive and cannot be precisely defined in the abstract. It must be sought in each situation, depending on the context, and in this sense, our meeting has also taught us humility. There are principles, paths, examples, model laws, systems that work well, and best practices, but there are no dogmas that can be adapted to each context. And it is in this respect, too, that the national committees have an essential role to play. That role consists of giving an account of their situation and its particular characteristics so that solutions best suited to that situation can be sought, primarily through internal dialogue, but also by listening to other countries facing similar problems.

Over and above the particular characteristics of each situ- ation and their specific function as it relates to humanitarian law, the national committees are also the guardians of the core values on which humanitarian law is based: respect, compassion and solidarity, which are also the values on which any lasting peace must be based.

It is to these national committees – to all of you – that I should like to return in closing. You are not the ones I must convince of the importance we attach to these committees. Humanitarian law is a vast field that needs cultivation in order to be fertile, that is, in order to help save lives, prevent suffering and comfort victims in a real and tangible way. The national committees are an excellent tool for cultivating this field and for making humanitarian law fully meaningful. They are the spade which can and must work the field. But we must all be aware that, while the tool is necessary, it is useful only if it is used. There are now 103 national commit- tees. That is splendid, and we must strive to ensure that they continue to increase. But the challenge also, and especially, ANNEX 10 : CONCLUDING STATEMENT 339

is to make sure that all these committees are active and dynamic, full of energy and ideas. You are certainly already so: be even more so. And to that end, the cooperation that has been established between the national committees, and that can be further strengthened, is essential. Such cooperation, of course, takes place primarily at the regional level, for there are generally more common problems and similar systems at that level, and there is often also a common language. On the other hand, we have been informed of an agreement between the German and Peruvian national committees, which are not exactly neigh- bours. Why not increase such types of cooperation if the opportunity arises?

For its part, the ICRC is eager to help these committees, and that is what has prompted it to organize this meeting, and also to prepare fact sheets and other documents, to develop model laws, and to allow easy access to all the national laws on implementation. The ICRC is used to acting as a neutral intermediary in conflicts, but, as the convivial nature of this meeting has shown us, that is not what is involved here. The point is simply to promote the idea of creating national committees where they do not yet exist, to provide some coordination, to instil ideas, and to give technical support – in other words, to act as an organizer.

On the other hand, if there is one role the ICRC does not wish to play, it is that of a crutch. The ICRC cannot substi- tute itself for the national committees, and cooperation can also take place without it. I am thinking in particular of the ­committees which function well and which can serve as a model and a driving force for the others, notably at the regional level. As for the ICRC, it remains willing, of course, to play this supporting role, but it will fulfil it all the better if you help it by communicating your ideas and experiences. In this sense, this meeting has been very useful – in both senses, I think. And I should like to ask those who have not done so, or who have done so only partially, to reply again in writing to the questions posed 340 PREVENTING AND REPRESSING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

in the preparatory documents. That would be of great interest to everyone, and would enrich the report that will be drafted following this conference. This brings me to another point concerning the pledges that were made, both at the 2007 International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in Geneva and at the 2010 Review Conference of the Rome Statute in Kampala. I hope that these pledges will be scrupulously honoured and the ICRC so informed.

Our meeting was not an end in itself, but a stage in a process which, unfortunately, is far from finished. I say “unfortunately” because this process will be necessary for as long as war endures; like humanitarian law, therefore, it is associated with this sad reality.

Lastly, I should like above all for you to leave this meeting strengthened in your conviction that your work is useful and important. We have been told, and it is true, that when people are confronted with atrocities committed during conflicts, they can sometimes become discouraged and question whether the effort to counter impunity really has a preventive effect, whether humanitarian law serves any purpose. This doubt has been with us since the very begin- ning of international humanitarian law. After the war of 1870–1871, the failure to respect humanitarian law during that conflict led some to conclude that the law was useless and to advocate abandoning it. Others, including Gustave Moynier, whose work we recently commemorated on the one hundredth anniversary of his death, drew the opposite conclusion: they asked how the law could be strengthened, already putting forward, more than 100 years before its time, the idea of an international criminal court.

We do not have a choice, and we do not have the right to give way to discouragement. As long as there are wars, we must do all we can to better safeguard populations and to better protect and aid war victims. Do not forget that this beautiful and ambitious task lies behind all of your work. ANNEX 10 : CONCLUDING STATEMENT 341

I should not like to end this meeting without thanking all those who deserve to be thanked: those who conceived and organized this meeting, namely, Anne-Marie La Rosa and Cristina Pellandini, who has taken over as head of the Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, suc- ceeding Maria Teresa Dutli, who headed it for many years. Thanks are due also to the staff of the ICRC’s Advisory Service, all of whom did a huge amount of work, and who keep the Service running on a daily basis. Special gratitude goes to Valérie (we all know her by her first name), who was in charge of logistics, and who put all her effort for several months, and even up to the last minute, into ensuring that everything went smoothly. Many colleagues assisted in this effort, and I thank them as well.

Next, I should like to say a big thank-you to our interpreters, who have often had to chase after our speeches like a rider after a runaway horse.

And last but not least, I should like to convey my warmest thanks to the working group chairpersons and the rap- porteurs, who did an outstanding job, as you have observed, and to all of you for the documents you sent us, your written comments, and your numerous substantive statements. It is you who have made this gathering meaningful, and it is because of you that I can say without hesitation that it has been a real success. But it is one phase of a continuing effort. There will certainly be a fourth universal meeting and many regional meetings, although I cannot give you a precise schedule at this point. Above all, I am sure that tomorrow there will be national committees that will be even more active and dynamic.

I wish you all a safe return.

I declare closed the Third Universal Meeting of National Committees for the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law. MISSION The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is an impartial, neutral and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and other situations of violence and to provide them with assistance. The ICRC also endeavours to prevent suffering by promoting and strengthening humanitarian law and universal humanitarian principles. Established in 1863, the ICRC is at the origin of the Geneva Conventions and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. It directs and coordinates the international activities conducted by the Movement in armed conflicts and other situations of violence. 4138;2/002 02.2014 500