ABSTRACT Renewable Energy Enjoys Broad Popularity As An

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ABSTRACT Renewable Energy Enjoys Broad Popularity As An ABSTRACT Renewable energy enjoys broad popularity as an abstract concept, yet specific cases of industrial renewable energy development consistently encounter local opposition commonly characterized by the phrase ‘not in my backyard,’ or NIMBY. Scholars have recently attempted a broader, more thorough understanding of wind opposition focusing on discursive forms of investigation, but even these efforts are limited by unspoken assumptions of motivation and aim. These attempts have led to a sophisticated understanding of local scale arguments mobilized by wind opponents, but have ignored arguments on other scales. In a case study of Keyser, West Virginia, I discovered a broad range of arguments not included in the scholarly literature. This thesis will investigate arguments on scales including the global, national, regional, local, and individual. I will connect the local scale objections to broader scales through the lenses of landscape and placemaking theory, and I will investigate the emergent discourse of health impacts and Wind Turbine Syndrome through embodiment theory and parallel phenomena. Perceptions of Wind Power, Community, and Renewable Energy Landscapes Meridel Hanna Newton 2013 Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science 2013 Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisors, Dawn Biehler and David Lansing, for their invaluable help and advice. This project would not have been possible without them. I'd also like to thank my family for their support and understanding as I made my way through the last few years. Finally, the Allegheny Front Alliance was a crucial partner in my field work, and I thank them for their cooperation and willingness to participate. ii Table of Contents Chapter One - Introduction 1 The Problem 1 Wind Power in America 3 Study Site 6 Research Questions 10 Literature Review 11 The Power of NIMBY 11 Place and Landscape 13 Embodiment and Health 17 Methods 21 Outline of Thesis 23 Citations 25 Chapter Two - Beyond the Merely Local: Wind Opposition on the Extended Scale 30 Introduction 30 Methods 32 Literature of the Extended Scale 33 Background 36 The Extended Scale 38 Role of Government 40 Viability of Wind 44 Alternative to the Alternate 52 Conclusions 54 Citations 57 Chapter Three - The Local Scale: Place, Past and Present 59 Introduction 59 Literature of the Local Scale 61 Challenge to the Environment 66 Environment as Scenery 66 Environment as Ecology 71 Challenge to the Future 73 Decommissioning 75 Challenge to the Community 78 Conclusions 81 Citations 84 Chapter Four - The Individual Scale: Wind Turbine Syndrome and Post-modernism 86 Introduction 86 iii Approach 88 West Virginia as Wild 88 Health and Landscape 92 Wind Development and Health 94 Wind Turbine Syndrome 96 Overview 96 Wind Turbine Syndrome in Keyser 103 Constructing Turbines Through the Senses 109 Conclusions 111 Citations 113 Chapter Five - Conclusion 116 Summary 116 Key Findings 118 Limitations of the Study 120 Policy Implications 120 Citations 124 Appendix A - Interview Questions 125 iv List of Tables Revised framework of factors affecting public perceptions of wind farms. Source: Graham, Stephenson, and Smith, 2009 ..............................................................................33 v List of Figures Illustration 1: Keyser, West Virginia and surrounding wind farms. Source: maps.google.com .................................................................................................................8 Illustration 2: View of Pinnacle Wind Farm from Keyser, West Virginia. Photographer: Meridel Newton ...................................................................................................................9 Illustration 3: United States Wind Resource Map. Source: nrel.gov .................................47 vi Chapter One Introduction THE PROBLEM The sociologist Mhairi Aitken recently argued that the vast majority of scholarship on opponents of industrial scale wind development premise their work on a number of assumptions: that wind energy is broadly popular, and therefore, opposition to wind power is “deviant,” and that the reason to investigate wind opposition is to overcome it through the development of “trust” between residents, developers, and policymakers (2010). Aitken argues that these assumptions overwhelmingly frame scholarly work on wind opposition, and as a result, the literature is limited in scope and ineffective at furthering understanding. After conducting seventeen interviews among a variety of wind activists in Keyser, West Virginia, I concur with Aitken’s assessment. In my interviews, I encountered a wide range of opinion and reasoning behind wind opposition. Some people very specifically objected to the destruction of forest habitat necessary to construct industrial turbines, while others were more concerned with the effects the wind industry has on American manufacturing and trade. The framework of assumptions described by Aitken does not have room for such wide ranging dissent. In this thesis, I will explore the array of anti-wind arguments that I encountered in an effort to understand wind opposition on its own terms. While scholarship has increasingly become more nuanced, researchers investigating wind opposition still cleave to a limited view of the motivations and logic behind opposition to industrial development. Recent publications have sought to dismiss 1 the long accepted notion that industrial wind opponents are driven by NIMBYism – Not In My Backyard-ism – and replace it with multidimensional explanations of landscape, environment, history, and community (Wolsink, 20006; Devine-Wright 2005; Fisher and Brown, 2009). Even so, these investigators present a concept of wind opposition limited by their presumptions, their assumptions, and methodological barriers. While the effort to discredit the popular myth of NIMBYism is admirable and necessary, current scholarship on wind opposition needs to look further, to broaden its range and move beyond the assumptions Aitken identified. These assumptions have limited the field in ways which make a total understanding of wind opponents impossible to achieve. One of these limitations lies in the identification of arguments mobilized by wind opponents. Even in case studies using open-ended surveys or interview methodology, scholars tend to identify similar arguments from case to case, arguments centering on environmental issues, questions of community participation in the planning process, or unease over the appearance of industrial turbines. These arguments are local in scope, and frequently lead authors of the studies to suggest that a more integrated planning process utilizing greater community participation would resolve concerns. However, opponents of industrial wind power actually make their arguments across a large range of scales, by no means limited to only the local. Opponents analyze wind power from viewpoints as diverse as international economics and personal health. While local scale arguments of the environment and community are certainly important, opponents are also concerned with how industrial development impacts both global 2 issues and those as small-scale as individual human health. Yet despite this diversity of mobilized arguments, wind opposition literature continues to focus on the local and the local alone. This oversight may well be a result of the assumptions identified by Aitken. By ignoring all arguments that do not fit the established narrative, academia ensures that wind opposition will never be fully explored or understood. Understanding and acknowledging the full range of arguments mobilized by wind opponents is a vital step forward for the field, and one that must be taken. WIND POWER IN AMERICA The wind industry in the United States is emblematic of the renewable energy industry, and has grown as a result of a broad range of policy initiatives intended to encourage the spread of renewable power. These policies find their root in the 1978 Public Utilities and Regulatory Policy Act (PURPA), which for the first time required utilities to buy power from third parties at an avoided cost rate – that is, the cost of the utility’s typical output minus the costs avoided by buying from the cheaper third party. This act created a market for third party power, leading directly the first large-scale industrial wind farm in the country in New Hampshire, and the famous Altamount Pass in California (Martinot, 2004). In the 1990s, policy initiatives enacted on multiple levels of government boosted the incipient industry by encouraging specific governmental regions to set quotas and goals within their own jurisdiction. Several states adopted policy tools known as Renewables Portfolio Standards (RPS), in which state governments (and, in a few cases, 3 county governments) could require that their energy portfolio include a certain percentage of energy from renewable sources. Twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia have enacted these portfolio standards. Despite a 2012 campaign by the American Legislative Exchange Council to roll back portfolio standards, states have kept their quotas and, in a few cases, passed laws requiring greater percentages of renewable energy. Though there is no federal RPS, the United States federal government has supported renewable energy development in several ways. A 2008 study by the Department of Energy found that a goal of 20% wind energy was
Recommended publications
  • Wind Energy in Indian Country: Turning to Wind for the Seventh Generation
    Wind Energy in Indian Country: Turning to Wind for the Seventh Generation by Andrew D. Mills Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In the Energy and Resources Group of the University of California, Berkeley Approved: _______________________________________________________ Daniel Kammen Date Professor, Energy and Resources, Goldman School of Public Policy University of California, Berkeley Approved: ________________________________________________________ Alastair Iles Date Post-Doctoral Scholar University of California, Berkeley Received by the Graduate Secretary: ___________________________________________ Jane Stahlhut Date Wind Energy in Indian Country A.D. Mills Abstract Abstract Utility-scale wind projects are increasingly being developed in rural areas of the United States. In the West in particular, many of the Native American reservations have large areas of windy lands suitable for large-scale wind projects. A number of these tribes are interested in developing wind projects on their land for the purpose of economic development. The aim of this project is to show how wind energy projects on tribal lands can benefit economic development. Further, the project will explore the role of tribal decisions and federal incentives on the feasibility of a project. Although a number of studies have investigated the total impact of wind energy projects on rural economies, no comprehensive study has been carried out for a tribal wind energy project. Tribal wind energy projects are different than other rural wind projects in a number of important ways. The tribe has the option of becoming more than a simple landowner by participating in a project as a partner with an outside investment company or by developing the project on their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy Development in Region 8 Draft 12/19/07
    Wind Energy Development in Region 8 Draft 12/19/07 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 POTENTIAL FOR WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN REGION 8 3.0 BENEFITS OF WIND ENERGY 4.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF WIND ENERGY PROJECTS 5.0 WHAT LAWS APPLY TO WIND ENERGY PROJECTS? 6.0 EPA POLICIES AND PROCEDURES PROMOTING WIND ENERGY 7.0 OTHER FEDERAL RESOURCES 8.0 STATE AND TRIBAL RESOURCES 9.0 REFERENCES 1 Wind Energy Development in Region 8 EPA Region 8 supports a sound national energy policy that encourages a clean and diverse portfolio of domestic energy supplies. Renewable energy can help provide for our future needs by harnessing abundant, naturally occurring sources of energy, such as the sun, the wind, geothermal heat, and biomass. Renewable and alternative energy supplies not only help diversity our energy portfolio; they do so with few adverse environmental impacts. Region 8 has significant potential for wind energy development. States and tribes in this Region are actively engaged in increasing wind energy projects in their areas. In an ongoing effort to accelerate and streamline the development of wind energy resources, and to ensure that human health and the environment are protected as wind energy production continues to increase, EPA Region 8 has adopted this document regarding wind energy development projects. In 2004, Region 8 adopted a regional energy strategy. This strategy sets forth a vision for 2010, which calls for increased energy efficiency and renewable energy as one of four key regional energy goals. Region 8’s energy strategy states, “[t]he challenge is to identify steps that EPA can take in the near and mid-term to accelerate and streamline the development of this and other clean, renewable energy resources.” Region 8’s regional energy strategy may be found at http://www.epa.gov/region8/R8EnergyStrategyFinalDraftv3.30.04NoMaps.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis and Comparison of Baseline Avian and Bat Use, Raptor Nesting and Mortality Information from Proposed and Existing Wind Developments
    Synthesis and Comparison of Baseline Avian and Bat Use, Raptor Nesting and Mortality Information from Proposed and Existing Wind Developments FINAL Prepared for: Bonneville Power Administration PO Box 3621 Portland, Oregon 97208-3621 Prepared by: Wally Erickson Greg Johnson David Young Dale Strickland Rhett Good Michelle Bourassa Kim Bay Karyn Sernka WEST, Inc. 2003 Central Ave. Cheyenne, WY 82001 Foote Creek Rim, WY. photo by David Young December 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 10 METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 13 AVIAN MORTALITY ............................................................................................................. 13 AVIAN USE ............................................................................................................................. 13 RAPTOR NESTING................................................................................................................. 15 BAT USE AND MORTALITY................................................................................................ 16 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................................................. 16 AVIAN MORTALITY AND USE..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America FY06 Activities Summary
    Wind Powering America FY06 Activities Summary Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY06 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state wind working groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of FY07 (October 2006), there were 11,078 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 3,000 MW projected in both 2007 and 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. In 1999, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Sixteen states now have more than 100 MW installed. We anticipate five to six additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2007, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the hardest and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. WPA continues to work with its national, regional, and state partners to communicate the opportunities and benefits of wind energy to a diverse set of stakeholders. WPA now has 29 state wind working groups (welcoming New Jersey, Indiana, Illinois, and Missouri in 2006) that form strategic alliances to communicate wind’s benefits to the state stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial-Economic Cost-Reduction Pathway Analysis for U.S. Offshore
    A Spatial-Economic Cost- Reduction Pathway Analysis for U.S. Offshore Wind Energy Development from 2015–2030 Philipp Beiter, Walter Musial, Aaron Smith, Levi Kilcher, Rick Damiani, Michael Maness, Senu Sirnivas, Tyler Stehly, Vahan Gevorgian, Meghan Mooney, and George Scott National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-66579 September 2016 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 A Spatial-Economic Cost- Reduction Pathway Analysis for U.S. Offshore Wind Energy Development from 2015–2030 Philipp Beiter, Walter Musial, Aaron Smith, Levi Kilcher, Rick Damiani, Michael Maness, Senu Sirnivas, Tyler Stehly, Vahan Gevorgian, Meghan Mooney, and George Scott National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared under Task No. WE15.CA02 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-6A20-66579 Golden, CO 80401 September 2016 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • AREDAY 2018 Program
    Presents the 15th Annual AREDAY Summit 2018 Global Security, Conservation Capitalism & Regeneration: Whole Systems Solutions to Climate Change “We need to respect the oceans and take care of them as if our lives depended on it. Because they do.” — Sylvia Earle Since 2004 bringing leaders and educators together to promote the rapid implementation of renewable energy and energy efficient strategies as practical solutions to the climate crisis through presentation, demonstration, performance, film and dialogue. Global Security, Conservation Capitalism & Regeneration: Whole Systems Solutions to Climate Change WELCOME TO THE 15TH ANNIVERSARY AREDAY SUMMIT, IMPACT FILM, Expo, AREDAY Electric and Concert. Our theme this year is Global Security, Conservation Capitalism and Regeneration: Whole Systems Solutions to Climate Change. What does it mean to have Global Security in 2018? The challenges of humanity and life on Earth are ever escalating, and range from the threat of nuclear war to precious Arctic ice melting along with the Greenland Ice Sheet and the Antarctic. Oceans are acidifying and over half of the world’s coral reef has bleached due to a warming world. Species and habitat loss is rampant. CO2 emissions and climate change advances are at a turning point in 2020 - to reverse or not, and the list goes on. The solutions are front and center and at the American Renewable Energy Institute we focus on 10% of the problem and pursue 90% of the solution. This year’s AREDAY Summit is an invitation to join us in the exploration of solutions and the collaborations for implementation. In Aspen/Snowmass, Colorado we have gathered over 160 of the world’s leading minds and innovators for four days of discussions and deliberations to tackle solutions to these very pressing issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Energy Overview & Options
    ALTERNATIVE ENERGY OVERVIEW & OPTIONS For Use By Residents, Businesses & Institutions This document includes: o how to get started on adding energy-saving measures to your home or workplace, o overview of the main alternative energy types available, o web links for further information, and o details on Ohio-based companies providing alternative energy services and materials. How to Get Started Perform an energy audit o An energy audit is a comprehensive examination of the structure and energy systems in your facility or building. o The audit will: . Identify cost-effective, energy-saving measures in your facility. Evaluate the performance of your facility's heating, ventilating, and cooling systems. Screen your facility for opportunities to conserve water and use clean, renewable energy systems. Create action plans for greater energy and water efficiency. Select Alternative Energy Options o Choose renewable energy technologies and energy efficiency options you would like to pursue. o You can select just one or combinations of two or more types. Explore Available Funding & Credits o Look into financial incentives for tax credits, available grants, and renewable energy credits. o Visit the GEO & DSIRE websites. Contact a consultant/contractor/supplier o Contact a group to help you implement your selections. o You can get assistance from start to finish: . Energy audits. Recommendation on ideal alternative energy selections for your facility. Available funding research and applications. Construction/installation of the alternative energy equipment and materials. o See attached Ohio-based companies list. If you have further questions about alternative energy, please feel free to contact the City of Newark. The City Planner, Kimberly Burton, can be reached at (740) 670-7547 or [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • AREDAY 2012 Program
    9th Annual Leadership for America’s August 16 - 20, 2012 Aspen, Colorado Energy Future “…the Federal Government can and should lead by example when it comes to creating innovative ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, increase energy efficiency, conserve water, reduce waste, and use environmentally-responsible products and technologies.” – President Obama OCTOBER 2009 9th Annual Welcome to the 9th annual American Renewable Energy Day Summit, Expo, and Film Festival, “Leadership for America’s Energy Future: A National Conversation.” Now is the time for leadership. 2012 is a year for critical leadership on energy solutions locally, regionally, and nationally. In November we will be electing a President, members of Congress, and local leaders. The nexus of energy, water, and climate is incumbent upon us. The month of July has been the warmest month in American recorded history and with a severe drought gripping the nation, there has never been a more urgent need to advance renewable energy. We ask our presenters and participants to step up to the task of identifying and addressing what must be done in order to facilitate a transition from fossil fuels to clean technology. This year can be a turning point. We ask all of you to embrace the challenge of providing individual and collective leadership necessary to take our nation onto a sustainable path forward. AREDAY is a project of the American Renewable Energy Institute - AREI, Inc. Chip Comins Ginna Kelly Sally Ranney Chairman, AREI VP & General Counsel, AREI President, AREI 8:45 am Keynote Remarks: Renewable Energy in the Military Thursday, August 16, 2012 Vice Admiral Dennis McGinn ACORE 11:30 am Armchair Conversation & Luncheon: 9:00 am Keynote Remarks: Leadership for America’s Leadership for America’s Energy Future Energy Future Amory Lovins Rocky Mountain Institute General Wesley Clark Growth Energy Thomas L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Integrated Resource Plan Report Is Based Upon the Best Available Information at the Time of Preparation
    FILED 4-04-17 2017 INTEGRATED 04:59 PM RESOURCE PLAN Volume I April 4, 2017 This 2017 Integrated Resource Plan Report is based upon the best available information at the time of preparation. The IRP action plan will be implemented as described herein, but is subject to change as new information becomes available or as circumstances change. It is PacifiCorp’s intention to revisit and refresh the IRP action plan no less frequently than annually. Any refreshed IRP action plan will be submitted to the State Commissions for their information. For more information, contact: PacifiCorp IRP Resource Planning 825 N.E. Multnomah, Suite 600 Portland, Oregon 97232 (503) 813-5245 [email protected] http://www.pacificorp.com This report is printed on recycled paper Cover Photos (Top to Bottom): Wind Turbine: Marengo Wind Project Solar: Pavant Solar Plant Transmission: Sigurd to Red Butte Transmission Line Demand-Side Management: Smart thermostat Pacific Power wattsmart Business Customer Meeting Thermal-Gas: Blundell Geothermal Plant PACIFICORP – 2017 IRP TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………….………….……..….. i INDEX OF TABLES ………..…………..……………………………………………..……..….. viii INDEX OF FIGURES ….………………………………………………….….……..………..….. xi CHAPTER 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………………………….………………..…. 1 PREFERRED PORTFOLIO HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................... 2 NEW RENEWABLE RESOURCES AND TRANSMISSION ..........................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Industry Braces for Trump Page 28
    Volume 13, Number 11 ■ December 2016 ® Wind Industry Braces For Trump page 28 Transmission No easy fixes for wind’s most pressing issue. page 22 Spotlight: Colorado Renewable-friendly policies promote development. page 26 a_01_NAW1612.indd 1 11/18/16 10:14 AM a_Suzlon_1611.indd 1 10/11/16 5:30 PM Contents Features 14 14 Thriving In A Post-PTC Era Check out how the wind industry is planning for life after the PTC phaseout. 18 New Lines Breathe Life Into Colorado Project New projects – and with them, new transmission lines – open up the state for wind development. 20 Taking Costs Out Of The Transportation Equation Getting your turbine components to the site is always a logistical dance – but it need not be costly. 22 No Easy Transmission Fixes Unfortunately, there are no elegant solutions for the wind industry’s transmission woes. 26 Rocky Mountain High Colorado continues to prioritize renewable energy. 20 28 Trump Wins U.S. Presidential Election: Now What? Representing a stark contrast from the past eight years, a Republican-led Trump administration is making its way into the White House in January. 28 26 Departments 4 Wind Bearings 6 New & Noteworthy 12 Policy Watch 31 Projects & Contracts 34 Viewpoint North American Windpower • December 2016 • 3 d_NAW_03_1612.indd 3 11/17/16 4:34 PM Wind Bearings www.nawindpower.com [email protected] 100 Willenbrock Road, Oxford, CT 06478 Toll Free: (800) 325-6745 It Happened Phone: (203) 262-4670 Fax: (203) 262-4680 MICHAEL BATES Publisher & Vice President [email protected] Mark Del Franco MARK DEL FRANCO Associate Publisher (203) 262-4670, ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitepaper on Wind Power.Pdf
    National Rural Electric Cooperative Association 4301 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 22203-1860 April 2003 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. WIND POWER FUNDAMENTALS 3 III. WHERE THE WIND BLOWS 6 IV. STATE AND FEDERAL INITIATIVES 9 V. WIND POWER TECHNOLOGY 23 VI. DISTRIBUTION UTILITY ISSUES 30 VII. TRANSMISSION AND THE WHOLESALE MARKET 53 VIII. ISSUES FROM THE CONSUMER PERSPECTIVE 59 IX. WIND ECONOMICS 64 X. RESOURCES 74 I. INTRODUCTION Consumer and public interest in the use of renewable energy resources is growing. National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA) resolution 01-D-3, Support for Fuel Diversity and a National Energy Policy, urges NRECA to “participate in the development of a national energy policy, and to encourage all cooperatives to support research and development to promote the utilization of all existing and new fuels and technologies, including those that utilize domestic resources.” As of November 2002, nearly 200 NRECA members offer “green power” programs, including power generated by such technologies as wind, solar, biomass, landfill gas, as well as green power purchased by cooperatives at wholesale for resale to their consumers. One renewable energy resource receiving a great deal of attention from rural consumers and public agencies is wind. Wind is the fastest-growing form of renewable energy in the United States. For example, from 1991 to 2002, the production of electricity from wind turbines in the United States has more than doubled, a growth rate faster than any other form of power generation. Today there are more than 25,000 MW of wind generation installed worldwide, with more than 4600 MW in the United States alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Peoples - Native Homelands Climate Change Workshop II Final Report Nancy G
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Native Peoples - Native Homelands Climate Change Workshop II Final Report Nancy G. Maynard, Editor November 18-21, 2009 Mystic Lake on the Homelands of the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community Prior Lake, Minnesota www.nasa.gov For further information on the Native Peoples-Native Homelands Climate Change Workshop II and follow-up activities, please contact: Dr. Nancy G. Maynard Emeritus Scientist, Cryospheric Sciences Branch NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Code 615 & Visiting Scientist Cooperative Institute for Marine & Atmospheric Studies (CIMAS) Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science (RSMAS) University of Miami 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway Miami, FL 33149-1031 [email protected] [email protected] Dr. Daniel Wildcat Professor, American Indian Studies Director of the Haskell Environmental Research Studies Center Convener of the American Indian/Alaska Native Climate Change Working Group Haskell Indian Nations University 155 Indian Avenue Lawrence, KS 66044 [email protected] [email protected] To download a pdf of this workshop report, please go to: http://neptune.gsfc.nasa.gov/csb/index.php?section=278 Suggested Citation for Workshop Report: Maynard, N. G., (Ed.) 2014. Native Peoples - Native Homelands Climate Change Workshop II - Final Report: An Indigenous Response to Climate Change. November 18-21, 2009. Prior Lake, Minnesota 132 pp. Partners Table of Contents Editor’s Notes .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]