DOCSLIB.ORG

SADEV Report 2009:3.1 Uganda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SADEV Report 2009:3.1 Uganda Party Cooperation in a Results Perspective Country Study: Uganda n SADEV 2009:3.1 REPORT Swedish Agency for Development Evaluation P. O. Box 1902, SE-651 19 Karlstad, Sweden SADEV REPORT 2009:3.1 Party Cooperation in a Results Perspective Country Study: Uganda Authors: Eva-Marie Kjellström, Sabiti Makara and Peter Sjöberg Copyright: SADEV SADEV Reports are available at www.sadev.se Printed in Karlstad, Sweden 2010 ISSN 1653-9249 ISBN 978-91-85679-18-8 PARTY COOPERATION IN A RESULTS PERSPECTIVE INTRODUCTION Acronyms CIL Change Initiative Limited CIS Center Party International Foundation/Centerpartiets Internationella Stiftelse CP Conservative Party DDP Deepening Democracy Programme DP Democratic Party FDC Forum for Democratic Change FES Friedrich Ebert Stiftung IDEA Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance IPC Inter-party cooperation IPA Inter-party alliance IRI International Republican Institute JEEMA Justice Forum JHS Jarl Hjalmarson Foundation/Jarl Hjalmarson Stiftelsen KAS Konrad Adenauer Stiftung KIC Christian Democratic International Centre/Kristdemokratiskt Internationellt Centrum NDC National Delegates Conference NDI National Democratic Institute NGO Non Governmental Organisation NIMD Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy NRM National Resistance Movement PAO Party Affiliated Organisation PPP People’s Progressive Party RYPLA Regional Young Political Leadership Academy Sida Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency Silc Swedish International Liberal Centre 1 PARTY COOPERATION IN A RESULTS PERSPECTIVE INTRODUCTION UPC Uganda People’s Congress UWOPA Ugandan Women’s Parliamentary Association 2 PARTY COOPERATION IN A RESULTS PERSPECTIVE INTRODUCTION Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 4 2 Main Findings ..................................................................................... 5 2.1 Political Context ........................................................................................... 5 2.2 Strategies and Approaches .......................................................................... 5 2.3 Effectiveness ................................................................................................. 5 2.4 Relevance ....................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Side Effects .................................................................................................... 7 2.6 Sustainability .................................................................................................. 7 2.7 Observations and Lessons .......................................................................... 8 3 Joint Project for Alliance Building ................................................. 10 3.1 Background .................................................................................................10 3.2 Project Design .............................................................................................10 3.3 Activities and Output .................................................................................12 3.4 Effectiveness ...............................................................................................13 3.5 Relevance .....................................................................................................14 3.6 Sustainability ................................................................................................15 3.7 Observations and Lessons ........................................................................16 4 KIC – Regional Young Political Leadership Academy (RYPLA) ............................................................................................ 18 4.1 Background .................................................................................................18 4.2 Project Design .............................................................................................18 4.3 Activities and Output .................................................................................20 4.4 Effectiveness ...............................................................................................21 4.5 Relevance .....................................................................................................22 4.6 Side Effects ..................................................................................................22 4.7 Sustainability ................................................................................................22 4.8 Other Observations and Lessons .............................................................23 Appendix 1: List of Persons Met ............................................................. 25 Appendix 2: The Party System of Uganda ............................................. 28 References .................................................................................................. 45 3 PARTY COOPERATION IN A RESULTS PERSPECTIVE INTRODUCTION 1 Introduction This report presents the findings of the country study on Uganda, undertaken as part of the evaluation of democracy support through Swedish party affiliated organisations (PAOs). The report is one of three country studies linked to the evaluation. The overall findings, conclusions and recommendations of the evaluation are presented in the main report. The visit to Uganda was undertaken October 5-16, 2009. The evaluation team (the Team) met with partner organisations, persons responsible for project implementa- tion, project participants, NGO representatives, international party foundations, independent researchers and the Swedish Embassy. Before the visit to Uganda, the Team met with the concerned Swedish PAOs. A debriefing with the Swedish organi- sations was made after the visit. A list of persons met is attached in Appendix 1. The PAOs have two projects in Uganda. One is a joint project to support inter-party cooperation (IPC), which has engaged four organisations on the Swedish side: the Christian Democratic International Centre (KIC), the Center Party International Foundation (CIS), the Swedish International Liberal Center (Silc) and Jarl Hjalmarson Foundation (JHS).1 The cooperation partners in Uganda have been the main opposi- tion parties: Forum for Democratic Change (FDC), Conservative Party (CP), the Justice Forum (JEEMA) and Uganda People’s Congress (UPC). Initially, the Democ- ratic Party (DP) was also part of the cooperation but it later decided to instead become an observer. The other project in Uganda is the Regional Young Political Leadership Academy (RYPLA), a KIC project implemented in cooperation with the National Democratic Institute (NDI). Each project is assessed with respect to effectiveness and relevance.2 The assessment of effectiveness is made against the specific objectives of each project, as described in project documents and interviews. The assessment of relevance draws on an analysis of the party system attached in Appendix 2. The report also presents observations made regarding side effects and sustainability, as well as lessons and other observa- tions of interest. A summary of main findings is presented in the Chapter two. Findings in respect to the specific projects are presented in Chapters three and four. The Team has consisted of Eva-Marie Kjellström, Sabiti Makara and Peter Sjöberg. We would like to thank everyone who contributed to the evaluation in different ways! 1 JHS has not been part of the project after 2008. 2 Effectiveness: the extent to which the development intervention’s objectives were achieved, or are expected to be achieved, taking into account their relative importance. Relevance: The extent to which the objectives of a development intervention are consistent with beneficiaries’ requirements, country needs, global priorities and partners’ and donors’ policies. Source: Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results-Based management, Sida in cooperation with OECD/DAC, 2007. 4 PARTY COOPERATION IN A RESULTS PERSPECTIVE MAIN FINDINGS 2 Main Findings 2.1 Political Context Since independence in 1962, Uganda has had a troubled political development, plagued with internal conflicts, authoritarian one-party rule, militarism, intolerant multiparty systems, and suspension of party activities under the National Resistance Movement (NRM) lifted as late as in 2005. This has limited the development of an effective party system, a tolerant democratic political culture, and practice of competitive politics. As a result, the newly allowed parties lack strong links with the citizenry, resources to expand their operations, and the strength to compete effec- tively. This in turn has contributed to public suspicion towards multiparty politics in general, and political parties in particular. In addition, the aspirations and interests of women and youth are often resisted, and marginalized within the political sphere. 2.2 Strategies and Approaches The two projects in Uganda represent two different approaches to strengthen democ- racy. However, both have been multi-party, contrasting with the more common ‘fraternal’ cooperation. The joint project for alliance building has aimed at strengthening the opposition parties internally and improving the dialogue between them, thereby making them a more influential political force. The Swedish PAOs have primarily facilitated the establishment of a joint structure for IPC, which has included thematic working groups, signing of a joint protocol and a proposed joint electoral platform.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1612517024List of Dormant Accounts.Pdf
    DORMANT ACCOUNTS LIST AS AT JANUARY 2021 BRANCH CUSTOMER NAME APAC OKAE JASPER ARUA ABIRIGA ABUNASA APAC OKELLO CHARLES ARUA ABIRIGA AGATA APAC ACHOLI INN BMU CO.OPERATIVE SOCIETY APAC OKELLO ERIAKIM ARUA ABIRIGA JOHN APAC ADONGO EUNICE KAY ITF ACEN REBECCA . APAC OKELLO PATRICK IN TRUST FOR OGORO ISAIAH . ARUA ABIRU BEATRICE APAC ADUKU ROAD VEHICLE OWNERS AND OKIBA NELSON GEORGE AND OMODI JAMES . ABIRU KNIGHT DRIVERS APAC ARUA OKOL DENIS ABIYO BOSCO APAC AKAKI BENSON INTRUST FOR AKAKI RONALD . APAC ARUA OKONO DAUDI INTRUST FOR OKONO LAKANA . ABRAHAM WAFULA APAC AKELLO ANNA APAC ARUA OKWERA LAKANA ABUDALLA MUSA APAC AKETO YOUTH IN DEVELOPMENT APAC ARUA OLELPEK PRIMARY SCHOOL PTA ACCOUNT ABUKO ONGUA APAC AKOL SARAH IN TRUST FOR AYANG PIUS JOB . APAC ARUA OLIK RAY ABUKUAM IBRAHIM APAC AKONGO HARRIET APAC ARUA OLOBO TONNY ABUMA STEPHEN ITO ASIBAZU PATIENCE . APAC AKULLU KEVIN IN TRUST OF OLAL SILAS . APAC ARUA OMARA CHRIST ABUME JOSEPH APAC ALABA ROZOLINE APAC ARUA OMARA RONALD ABURA ISMAIL APAC ALFRED OMARA I.T.F GERALD EBONG OMARA . APAC ARUA OMING LAMEX ABURE CHRISTOPHER APAC ALUPO CHRISTINE IN TRUST FOR ELOYU JOVIN . APAC ARUA ONGOM JIMMY ABURE YASSIN APAC AMONG BEATRICE APAC ARUA ONGOM SILVIA ABUTALIBU AYIMANI APAC ANAM PATRICK APAC ARUA ONONO SIMON ACABE WANDI POULTRY DEVELPMENT GROUP APAC ANYANGO BEATRASE APAC ARUA ONOTE IRWOT VILLAGE SAVINGS AND LOAN ACEMA ASSAFU APAC ANYANZO MICHEAL ITF TIZA BRENDA EVELYN . APAC ARUA OPIO JASPHER ACEMA DAVID APAC APAC BODABODA TRANSPORTERS AND SPECIAL APAC ARUA OPIO MARY ACEMA ZUBEIR APAC APALIKA FARMERS ASSOCIATION APAC ARUA OPIO RIGAN ACHEMA ALAHAI APAC APILI JUDITH APAC ARUA OPIO SAM ACHIDRI RASULU APAC APIO BENA IN TRUST OF ODUR JONAN AKOC .
    [Show full text]
  • NIMD Fostering Multiparty Democracy in Uganda
    NIMD fostering multiparty democracy in Uganda The Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (NIMD) works to promote peaceful, justice and inclusive politics worldwide. Today, as the organisation is celebrating 10 years of operations in Uganda, Daily Monitor’s Paul Murungi, spoke to Mr Frank Rusa, the Country Representative who also doubles as the Executive Secretary of Inter- Party Organisation for Dialogue (IPOD) Council. Below are the excerpts: political platform. We have therefore, for the last shape the agenda and give technical support. I build dialogue, you have to continue building trust 10 years, focused on working with political parties provide support to the secretariat to ensure that I by showing concern over the issues raised. I need to build internal organisational mechanisms for oversee that staff is responding well to programme to tell you that the current chairman of the IPOD conflict resolution, strong accounting systems, objectives and outcomes that we seek to achieve Summit, Mr Asuman Basalirwa has been going robust women and youth leagues, and the way in Uganda. around political parties calling for another summit, political parties should function. and he has informed me that the FDC president, Uganda’s multiparty political landscape has Mr Patrick Oboi Amuriat has expressed willingness Tell us more about the composition of Inter- grown exponentially since 2005 to include many to attend the next summit, so I believe with time, Party Organisation for Dialogue (IPOD). political parties. Why is it that some political we will build trust and parties’ commitment shall In 2009 IPOD was formed on a Memorandum of parties are not part of IPOD? increase.
    [Show full text]
  • EISA Technical ASSESSMENT TEAM REPORT UGANDA The
    EISA OBSERVER MISSION REPORT i EISA TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT TEAM REPORT UGANDA THE UGANDAN PRESIDENTIAL AND PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS OF 18 FEBRUARY 2011 ii EISA OBSERVER MISSION REPORT EISA OBSERVER MISSION REPORT iii EISA TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT MISSION REPORT UGANDA THE UGANDAN PRESIDENTIAL AND PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS OF 18 FEBRUARY 2011 2012 iv EISA OBSERVER MISSION REPORT Published by EISA 14 Park Rd, Richmond Johannesburg South Africa P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 381 6000 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 978-1-920446-36-9 © EISA 2012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2012 EISA strives for excellence in the promotion of credible elections, participatory democracy, human rights culture, and the strengthening of governance institutions for the consolidation of democracy in Africa. EISA Technical Assessment Mission Report, No. 41 EISA OBSERVER MISSION REPORT v CONTENTS Acknowledgements vii Acronyms and Abbreviations viii Executive Summary ix Terms of Reference of the EISA Technical Assessment Team x Methodology of the Technical Assessment Team xii The EISA Approach to Election Observation xiii 1. Historical and Political Overview 1 1.1 Historical background 1 1.2 Political and electoral background 3 1.3 Elections in Uganda 4 2. Constitutional, Legal & Institutional Framework 7 2.1 Constitutional and legal framework 7 2.2 Electoral framework 9 2.3 The Electoral Commission of Uganda 17 2.4 Other institutions involved in elections 19 2.5 The electoral system 19 2.6 Challenges 20 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 DRAFT BUSINESS TRANSACTED DURING the 1St SESSION of the 10TH PARLIAMENT W.E.F 16Th May 2016 TILL 1ST JUNE 2017 HIGHLIGHTS Admi
    DRAFT BUSINESS TRANSACTED DURING THE 1st SESSION OF THE 10TH PARLIAMENT W.E.F 16th May 2016 TILL 1ST JUNE 2017 HIGHLIGHTS Administration of Oaths to Members Elect 16/05/16: Members Elect were sworn in as Members of Parliament 17/05/16: Members Elect were sworn in as Members of Parliament 18/05/16: Members Elect were sworn in as Members of Parliament 19/05/16: Election of Speaker and Deputy Speaker of Parliament 20/05/16: Burahya County (MP elect), Ms. Margaret Mugisa Muhanga was sworn in as a Member of Parliament, before the Speaker of Parliament, Rt. Hon. Rebecca Kadaga in her Boardroom at Parliament Building. (Precedent) 12/07/16: The Rt. Hon. Prime Minister/Leader of Government Business, (Ex-Officio) Mr. Ruhakana Rugunda was sworn in as a Member of Parliament 12/07/16: The Minister of Education and Sports, (Ex-Officio) Ms. Janet Kataha Museveni was sworn in as a Member of Parliament 12/07/16: The Minister of Works and Transport, (Ex-Officio), Eng. Ntege Azuba was sworn in as a Member of Parliament. 12/07/16: The Attorney General, (Ex-Officio) Mr. Byaruhanga William was sworn in as a Member of Parliament 12/07/16: The Minister without Portfolio (Ex-Officio), Hajji Abdu Nadduli was sworn in as a Member of Parliament 12/07/16: The Minister for Kampala Capital City (Ex-Officio), Ms. Kamya Betty was sworn in as Member of Parliament. 12/07/16: The Minister of Gender, Labour and Social Development, (Ex- Officio), Hajjat Mukwaya Janat was sworn in as Member of Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Presidential and Parliamentary Elections, 23
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Account of the mission to observe the presidential and parliamentary elections in Uganda 23 February 2006 Leader of the delegation: Mr Johan Van Hecke 16 March 2006 INTRODUCTION By letter dated 6 December 2005 the Ugandan Electoral Commission invited the European Union to observe the elections to be held in Uganda on 23 February 2006. At its meeting of 9 February 2006, the Conference of Presidents of the European Parliament authorised a delegation composed of seven members to observe these elections, to be appointed by the political groups in accordance with the continuous d'Hondt system. In the event four members were appointed (see below). A Memorandum of Understanding between the European Commission, on behalf of the European Union, and the Government of the Republic of Uganda on the observation of the 2006 elections was signed, after which a core team and long term observers (LTOs) went to Uganda under Mr Max van den Berg, MEP, Chief Observer. The European Parliament delegation to observe the elections consisted of: Mr Johan Van Hecke (ALDE) (appointed leader of the delegation on 15 February 2006) Mr José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil (EPP-ED) Mr Filip Kaczmarek (EPP-ED) Mr Fernand Le Rachinel (NI) the delegation was accompanied by Mrs Armelle Douaud and Mr John Bryan Rose of the European Parliament secretariat, Directorate General for External Policies. ARRIVALS Mr Van Hecke and Mr Le Rachinel arrived in Entebbe on 20 February 2006 at 22.50 hrs on flight SN481. Mr Kaczmarek arrived in Entebbe on 21 February 2006 at 11.00 hrs on flight ET809.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 a Political Chronicle Of
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Moving Forward, Backward or Staying the Same? Citation for published version: Murison, J & Lwanga, D 2012, 'Moving Forward, Backward or Staying the Same? The Political Chronicle of Uganda', L’Afrique des Grands Lacs . <https://www.uantwerp.be/en/faculties/iob/research-and- service/centre-for-the-study/l-afrique-des-grands/> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: L’Afrique des Grands Lacs Publisher Rights Statement: © Murison, J., & Lwanga, D. (2012). Moving Forward, Backward or Staying the Same?: The Political Chronicle of Uganda. L’Afrique des Grands Lacs . General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 A POLITICAL CHRONICLE OF UGANDA 2011: MOVING FORWARD, BACKWARD OR STAYING THE SAME? By Jude Murison and Doreen Lwanga Résumé En 2011, l’Ouganda restera dans les mémoires surtout pour les élections présiden- tielle et parlementaire tenues en février. Alors que les élections elles-mêmes n’ont pas été marquées par des violences importantes à l’époque, les mois qui ont suivi ces élections de février resteront dans les mémoires au plus haut niveau de violence, en particulier celle de la police nationale et de l’armée qui ont répondu lourdement à la campagne de « marche au travail ».
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Media in Curbing Corruption: the Case of Uganda Under President Yoweri K
    Economic & Social Affairs DESA Working Paper No. 72 ST/ESA/2009/DWP/72 January 2009 Role of media in curbing corruption: the case of Uganda under President Yoweri K. Museveni during the “no-party” system Monica Nogara Abstract Free, independent and hard-hitting media can play an important role in curbing corruption. Media in Uganda has enjoyed considerable freedom in this regard since Museveni came to power in 1986. The evolving power structure and a changing media landscape, however, have presented both challenges and opportunities for media’s watchdog role on corruption. This paper will explore how this environment defined such role between 1986 and 2006 during Museveni’s “no-party” rule. It argues that, although media won important battles to promote accountability in public offices, the regime’s complex power structure has consistently challenged their role as an instrument of public accountability. JEL Classification: D72, D73, D81, D82, D83, H11, K40, L82 Keywords: corruption, media, press freedom, governance, rule of law Monica Nogara is currently Economic Affairs Officer in the Office for ECOSOC Support and Coordination. E-mail: [email protected] Comments should be addressed by email to the author. Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 The role of media in curbing corruption ............................................................................. 2 The case of Uganda under President Yoweri K. Museveni ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Subject to Licence
    Freedom Subject to Licence Attempts to licence journalists in Uganda, Zambia and other Commonwealth African countries ARTICLE 19 ARTICLE 19, London ISBN 1 902598 02 4 March 1999 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was written by Joanna Stevens, a legal consultant to ARTICLE 19. The author wishes to acknowledge the valuable assistance gained in compiling this report from “Alerts” issued by the Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA) - distributed free of charge by the International Freedom of Expression Exchange Clearing House (IFEX) by e-mail subscription - which document threats to freedom of expression in Africa as they occur. The report was edited by Njonjo Mue, ARTICLE 19’s Legal Adviser, East and Southern Africa Regional Office. ARTICLE 19 would like to thank the European Commission for its support in funding this report. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 2. UGANDA ......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1. Early drafts ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.2. A compromise Bill.................................................................................................................. 9 2.3. Journalists as spectators..................................................................................................... 12 2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Uganda in the Supreme
    5 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION NO. O1 OF 2016 (CORAM: KATUREEBE, C.J, TUMWESIGYE, KISAAKYE, 10 ARACH AMOKO, NSHIMYE, MWANGUSYA,OPIO-AWERI, MWONDHA, TIBATEMWA-EKIRIKUBINZA, JJ.SC.) AMAMA MBABAZI …………………………………….PETITIONER VERSUS 15 YOWERI KAGUTA MUSEVENI ……………. 1stRESPONDENT ELECTORAL COMMISSION ……………… 2ndRESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ………………… 3rd RESPONDENT PROFESSOR OLOKA ONYANGO & 8 ORS………..AMICI 20 CURIAE DETAILED REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The Petitioner, who was one of the candidates in the presidential 25 election that was held on the 18th February, 2016 petitioned the 1 5 Supreme Court under the Constitution, the Presidential Elections Act, 2000 and the Electoral Commission Act, 1997 (hereinafterreferred to as the PEA and the ECA, respectively). He challenged the result of the election and sought a declaration that Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, the 1st Respondent, was not 10 validly elected and an order that the election be annulled. On the 31st March 2016, we delivered our decision in line with the Constitutional timeline imposed on the Court to render its judgment within 30 days from the date of filing the petition. We were not, however, in a position to give detailed reasons for our 15 findings and conclusion. We found that the 1st Respondent was validly elected as President in accordance with Article 104 of the Constitution and Section 59 of the PEA. Accordingly, we unanimously dismissed the petition. We made no order as to costs. 20 We promised to give the detailed reasons at a later date, which we now give in this judgment. Background The 18thFebruary 2016 General Elections were the 3rd since the re-introduction of multiparty politics in Uganda as the country 25 shifted from the movement system.
    [Show full text]
  • KAS Democracy Report 2009
    62 KAS Democracy Report 2009 uganda Sallie Simba Kayunga i. generaL information Political system uganda has a presidential system. The president and members of the ugandan Parliament (mPs) are elected separately. While the president and parliament each have different constitutional responsibilities, some of their responsibilities are interdependent. The president is both head of state and government and performs both the titular and executive functions. The president appoints ministers, ambassadors, the inspector general of the government and the inspector general of police. furthermore, he or she appoints, on the advice of the Judicial Service Commission, the chief justice, his or her deputy, the principle judge, judges of the Supreme Court, judges of the Court of Appeal and the panel of judges of the High Court. Whereas such presidential appointments are subject to parliamentary approval, there have been only rare instances when parliament has rejected a presidential appointee. As in other presidential systems, the president has, for example, the prerogative to declare war and also has the prerogative of mercy. The constitution also provides for the position of a prime minister, who is the leader of government business in parliament and who also coordinates the implementation of government policies, but without any executive powers. The prime minister is appointed by, and is accountable to, the president. Some of the common characteristics of a parliamentary system can also be identified in the ugandan political system. most of the ministers are, for example, appointed from among mPs to the extent that out of the 332 mPs, 69 or 21 per cent are active ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Abbreviations
    HRNJ - Uganda Human Rights Network for Journalists-Uganda (HRNJ-Uganda) Press Freedom Index Report April 2011 2 HRNJ - Uganda Contents Preface ....................................................................................................................... 5 Part I: Background .............................................................................................. 7 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 7 Elections and Media .............................................................................................. 7 Research Objective ............................................................................................... 8 Methodology ......................................................................................................... 8 Quality check ......................................................................................................... 8 Limitations ............................................................................................................. 9 Part II: Media freedom during national elections in Uganda ................................ 11 Media as a campaign tool ................................................................................... 11 Role of regulatory bodies ................................................................................... 12 Media self censorship ......................................................................................... 14 Censorship of social media
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Program Summary Political Party Strengthening Disabilities
    Uganda Program Summary Uganda’s return to multiparty politics following a 2005 referendum created new opportunities for political participation and competition. Nineteen years of de facto one-party rule however, created significant obstacles to peaceful political competition and the establishment of effective, representative political institutions. To support the people of Uganda as they establish a functioning, multiparty democracy in the face of these challenges, the International Republican Institute (IRI) designed a program to strengthen political pluralism, increase the involvement of women, youth, and persons with disabilities in political processes, and to support the development of political parties and organizations. Political Party Strengthening IRI works with political parties to develop strategic plans and to strengthen party structures. Party activities supported by IRI include promoting internal party democracy, increasing communication between party organs and improving internal party organization, so that vital party functions are carried out and established between elections. At the district level, parties have opened offices, recruited volunteers to staff their offices and increased publicity activities. Additionally, the Institute has sponsored an information and communications technology project for parties to establish interactive web forums at www.parties.ug and communicate with their members via SMS technology, the internet and radio. IRI also supports the policy development process of political parties through its work with the parties and their affiliated foundations. For these programs, IRI partners with the four largest parties in Uganda’s parliament: the National Resistance Movement, the Forum for Democratic Change, the Uganda People’s Congress and the Democratic Party. The Institute has also provided limited assistance to two other parties represented in the legislature: the Justice Forum and the Conservative Party.
    [Show full text]