Analysis of the Officials Performance in Public Health Center of Kurima and Dekai in Yahukimo Regency
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Galore International Journal of Applied Sciences and Humanities Vol.3; Issue: 2; April-June 2019 Website: www.gijash.com Original Research Article P-ISSN: 2456-8430 Analysis of the Officials Performance in Public Health Center of Kurima and Dekai in Yahukimo Regency Elisabeth Rombe Payung1, Yermia Msen2, A.L. Rantetampang3, Anwar Mallongi4 1Magister Program of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Cenderawasih University, Jayapura. 2,3Lecturer of Master Program in Public Health. Faculty of Public Health, Cenderawasih University, Jayapura 4Environmental Health Department, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar. Corresponding Author: Anwar Mallongi ABSTRACT quite good and do not have an adequate impact to the service in both health centers. Incentive Background: Health service development in for the officers helps them financially but it does Indonesia refers to the 2020’s National System not have a positive impact to the performance of of Health. The vision of the system is to fulfill the officials since it is not based on the official’s the human rights. In its implementation, performance. In both health centers, the officials Indonesia government set it into health’s admit that neither the leader of the health center development planning. One of the planning is to nor the health’s department in the Yahukimo encourage the health services. regency do not make any supervision. Public health center is the foreground public services to fulfill the health right. To make it Keyword: Performance, Health officials, Health sure, the performance of the official is a must. Center, Kurima, Dekai Objective: To describes the connection between some factors; motivation, leadership, 1. INTRODUCTION relationship, facilitation, safety, incentive and For this reason, health development supervision with the performance of health held at the Puskesmas aims to create a services’ official in public health center of community that: Has healthy behavior Kurima and Dekai. which includes awareness, willingness and Method: Qualitative description which use both method of interview and field observation. 18 ability to live healthy; Able to reach quality informants had been interviewed come from health services; Live in a healthy public health center of Kurima and Dekai, and environment and; Have optimal health from the Health department of Yahukimo status, both individuals, families, groups and regency. communities (Permenkes 75, 2014). As the Result: The motivation of the officials in both first strata health service center and the public health center are good. Most of the District Health Office Technical informants feel responsible to the health Implementation Unit, the Puskesmas is services. Leadership have a significant impact to responsible for organizing health the activation of the officials in both public development in an area. Health services at health centers. Relationship between the the puskesmas are comprehensive, officials in both public health centers get bad appraisal since most of the informants told that integrated, and sustainable which includes they do not work as a good team. Both public individual health services and public health health centers are different according to the services. Therefore the puskesmas functions facilitation they have. The facilitations in to conduct basic health services, referral Dekai’s public health center is most complete health services, epidemiological than in Kurima’s public health center. Some investigations and outbreaks of outbreaks officers in Kurima’s health center admit that the (KLB) and conduct health promotion and safety in the road from Wamena to Kurima community empowerment. becomes an obstacle for them to go to the health center. But in both health center, the safety are Galore International Journal of Applied Sciences and Humanities (www.gijash.com) 1 Vol.3; Issue: 2; April-June 2019 Elisabeth Rombe Payung et.al. Analysis of the Officials Performance in Public Health Center of Kurima and Dekai in Yahukimo Regency To carry out these functions in order years. In general, Yahukimo District to achieve the goals of the puskesmas, the received the lowest rating compared to other government issued a Minimum Service districts in Papua from the Eight (8) aspects Standard (SPM) to measure the performance assessed. The eight aspects are (1) Office of each puskesmas so that the puskesmas Secretariat, (2) Public Health Sector, (3) could provide health services. To make Health Service Sector, (4) Disease optimal health development efforts in Prevention and Control (P2P), (5) Health accordance with these minimum service Resources Sector, (6) UPT AIDS, Malaria standards, each puskesmas must be and TB, (7) UPT Regional Health supported by good employee performance. Laboratory Office and (8) Kadinkes. Employee performance is the result of a Although this assessment is general for the complex and continuous process carried out district health office, the performance of the by employees (internal factors) and also puskesmas, as a technical agency from the carried out by agencies or institutions. Good district health office, also influences this employee performance is of course an assessment. The low position of the expectation for all institutions that employ Yahukimo District Health Office is closely employees, because the performance of related to the performance of the employees is ultimately expected to increase puskesmas. the overall output of the agency. Therefore, it is also very important An organization, both government to see an overview of the determinant and private, is always driven by a group of factors that affect the performance of HR in people who play an active role in achieving the Puskesmas. It is intended that efforts to the goals of the organization. Organizational improve the performance of human goals certainly will not be achieved if the resources at the Puskesmas can be carried performance of members or employees is out effectively and efficiently. This study not optimal. According to Mangkunegara seeks to get an overview of the performance (2002) in Pasolong (2010) performance is of puskesmas in Yahukimo by sampling two the result of work in quality and quantity health centers in Yahukimo. The two achieved by someone in carrying out their puskesmas that are the focus of this research functions in accordance with the are Dekai Puskesmas and Kurima Health responsibilities given to them. Likewise the Center. The two Puskesmas were chosen purpose of the puskesmas is very much because they were still easily accessible and determined by the performance of health the number of staff placed in the two workers who are placed in the Puskesmas. puskesmas met the Minimum Service HR determines the achievement of the Standards from the aspect of manpower. stated goals. Without active human Dekai Health Center is one of the resources, the puskesmas becomes passive active health centers. The Puskesmas is and does not function properly because located in the center of Dekai with the status employees are the drivers who carry out of an outpatient health center. While the everything that is the task and function of Kurima health center is a health center with the business to achieve the goals of the an inpatient status. From the initial puskesmas. Therefore, improving HR observation, the Puskesmas Kurima was less performance is an important requirement active and more often there were no officers that deserves attention if you want to reach who came to serve. It is far from the city the health center goals. center of Dekai but close to the City of The Papua Province Health Office in Wamena with road access that can be the district health performance report report passed by vehicles. in the Papua Province revealed that the Yahukimo District Health Office occupied 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS the lowest position for two consecutive 2.1 Research Design Galore International Journal of Applied Sciences and Humanities (www.gijash.com) 2 Vol.3; Issue: 2; April-June 2019 Elisabeth Rombe Payung et.al. Analysis of the Officials Performance in Public Health Center of Kurima and Dekai in Yahukimo Regency This type of research is an The focus of this study limits itself observational study with a descriptive to the study of; work motivation, leadership, qualitative design approach. According to work relations, work support facilities, Syaodih (2008) in Pongtiku (2016) that security, incentives and supervision at 2 qualitative research is a study aimed at puskesmas namely Dekai health center and describing and analyzing phenomena, Kurima health center from 33 health centers events, social activities, attitudes, beliefs, in the Yahukimo health service area. This perceptions, thoughts of individuals as well was done by researchers considering the as groups. This type of research is area, the time of the study and the distance qualitative with a case study approach, travelled by each remote health center. which is a method of research conducted 2.3. Place and Time of Research with the aim of describing the problem that This research was conducted for 5 months, occurs to conclude the image objectively namely July to November 2018 at Kurima (Swarjana, 2013). Qualitative research Health Center and Dekai Yahukimo District examines participant perspectives with Health Center, Papua Province. strategies that are interactive and flexible. 2.4. Population and Informants Qualitative research is intended to 1. Population understand social phenomena from the Population is the total number of research