Redesigning Shopping Centers in the Delaware Valley: from Greyfields to Community Assets Publication Number: 05023 Date Published: June 2005

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Redesigning Shopping Centers in the Delaware Valley: from Greyfields to Community Assets Publication Number: 05023 Date Published: June 2005 JUNE2005 redesigning SHOPPING CENTERS in the Delaware Valley FROM GREYFIELDS TO COMMUNITY ASSETS JUNE2005 redesigning SHOPPING CENTERS in the Delaware Valley FROM GREYFIELDS TO COMMUNITY ASSETS Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty, and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. The logo combines these elements to depict the areas served by DVRPC. DVRPC is funded by a variety of sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Departments of Transportation, as well as by DVRPC's state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for this reports findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. table of contents ▀ Executive Summary i ▀ Chapter One: What are Greyfields? 1 ▀ Chapter Two: Redesign & Implementation of Greyfield Sites 17 ▀ Chapter Three: Methodology & Inventory of Shopping Centers 31 ▀ Chapter Four: Shopping Center Case Studies 41 Appendices Appendix I: Shopping Center Definitions 67 Appendix II: Shopping Center Tenants Median Sales per Square Foot 73 Appendix III: Shopping Centers and Potential Greyfields in the Delaware Valley 77 Resources 105 Maps Map 01: Shopping Centers and Potential Greyfields in New Jersey 39 Map 02: Shopping Centers and Potential Greyfields in Pennsylvania 40 Tables Table 01: General Characteristics of Shopping Centers 11 Table 02: Design Characteristics of Shopping Centers 13 Table 03: Summary of Shopping Centers in the Delaware Valley 38 Figures Figure 01: Design Techniques 22 Figure 02: Redesigned Shopping Center: Suburban Plaza, Hamilton, NJ 25 Figure 03: Photo Simulation: Suburban Plaza, Hamilton, NJ 48 Figure 04: Redesigned Harrowgate Plaza, Philadelphia, PA 64 executive summary The Delaware Valley has a plethora of shopping centers, with centers, otherwise known as greyfields, in the region that are more being constructed each year. Current development abandoned or which meet a definition of decline; and patterns and retail trends are forcing tenants to abandon older provides access management, public transit service, land use shopping centers and relocate to new, big-box regional centers and zoning and design recommendations to help communities and malls in outlying, growing townships. Over time, these to reinvent these places into vibrant, mixed-use centers. In older shopping centers have become vacant and present a addition, this report contains a shopping center inventory in blighting influence on their surrounding communities. Appendix III of all shopping centers in the Delaware Valley. Solutions to encourage revitalization and redesign can be Shopping centers have been categorized by type and size, and impeded by a lack of knowledge by municipal potential greyfields have been identified. The report contains officials on how to redevelop and renew these sites, working two other appendices that explain shopping center in concert with regional and local land use and transportation terminology and outline median sales per square foot for policies. This report identifies vacant or underused shopping shopping centers on a national average. These appendices are explained throughout the report. i chapter one: WHAT ARE GREYFIELDS ? 1. INTRODUCTION were initially successful, but as The purpose of the DVRPC redesign and development patterns and demands inventory of shopping centers study is to changed, they soon fell victim to their own develop land use, economic development, success. Bigger and more modern and transportation policy shopping centers utilizing cheaper, recommendations - including design undeveloped land were built further from guidelines - to help communities find new the dense urban areas while the older and innovative ways to recreate these shopping centers were left as “shells” of abandoned sites into viable parts of their what once characterized suburbia. communities. Today, these obsolete shopping centers Following closely behind post-World War have become architectural, fiscal, and II residential suburbanization was a rapid social eyesores. These shopping centers no growth of a new form of retailing called longer serve their communities and drain shopping centers. These new shopping the financial base and quality of life from centers provided persons moving to the nearby neighborhoods. These shopping suburbs with easy access to department centers are in need of attention, stores, specialty stores, and local services. particularly in the communities that have They became a place of gathering for the lost population and employment to the community and soon were a large part of bigger and newer exurban communities. social life for suburbanites. The shopping centers built in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s 3 While shopping centers have changed in policy recommendations, including design character, it is also important to recognize guidelines with featured case studies of that the communities in which they exist several local shopping centers. Consistent have also changed. As the middle class with DVRPC’s long-range plan and the moved out of the inner-ring communities region’s smart growth efforts, this study to larger homes in the growing suburbs, will help municipalities to understand how this left the homes in older communities as these abandoned centers and parcels can a more affordable alternative for less once again become economically viable affluent people who also wanted single- and thriving areas in their communities. family homes. As this trend was occurring, the older shopping centers and 2. WHAT IS A GREYFIELD? their retail practices were less adaptable, The Congress for the New Urbanism and began to struggle for survival. Once (CNU) and PricewaterhouseCoopers the community gathering place, many (PWC) introduced the term greyfield in a older shopping centers became community jointly published report in 2001, Greyfields liabilities. into Goldfields. This report recognized that many of the nation’s major shopping In order to combat this downward trend, centers and regional malls are obsolete and this study will document shopping centers offer tremendous value for communities in that qualify as greyfields in the DVRPC their redevelopment potential. While that region and provide land use, zoning, study does not address malls less than transportation, and economic development 500,000 square feet, there are similar 4 elements of decline that all centers exhibit. Greyfields differ from site to site. Not all DESIGNtip Vacant or underutilized community and greyfield sites are on the decline; some BY HAVING A THOROUGH neighborhood level shopping centers may still bring in sufficient revenue to UNDERSTANDING OF THE largely contribute to the visual blight of a remain open, but not enough for new EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY, community, as well as to the depletion of improvements. Owners of these sites, who ACCESS, DENSITY, the quality of life. In many communities, do not want to sell, often rent the space at VISIBILITY, AND these abandoned shopping centers often low rates to tenants that do not service the SETBACKS OF THE lead to a declining tax base for surrounding community. Such tenants EXISTING SHOPPING communities as well as losses in include flea markets, warehousing, or CENTER, IT WILL BE employment. storage; uses that often do not bring in EASIER TO INCORPORATE sufficient sales tax revenues. The Congress NEW DESIGN ELEMENTS Derelict shopping centers, otherwise known for a New Urbanism (CNU) suggests that INTO THE REDEVELOPED as greyfields or “dead malls,” are once a mall’s sales drop to $150 per square SITE. recognized by empty storefronts and vast foot or less, it qualifies as a greyfield. The areas of unused asphalt parking lots. They 2001 report about greyfields also suggests are older, economically depressed retail or that there may be as many as 140 commercial areas that are characterized by qualifying greyfields in the United States, outdated buildings, are in a state of while another 200-250 shopping centers are disrepair, lack sufficient physical space to quickly approaching this status. This meet market demand, and fail to generate represents approximately 18 percent of all the revenue that would justify their regional malls in the United States. continued use as retail centers. 5 3. HISTORY OF THE SHOPPING MALL department stores
Recommended publications
  • Prom 2018 Event Store List 1.17.18
    State City Mall/Shopping Center Name Address AK Anchorage 5th Avenue Mall-Sur 406 W 5th Ave AL Birmingham Tutwiler Farm 5060 Pinnacle Sq AL Dothan Wiregrass Commons 900 Commons Dr Ste 900 AL Hoover Riverchase Galleria 2300 Riverchase Galleria AL Mobile Bel Air Mall 3400 Bell Air Mall AL Montgomery Eastdale Mall 1236 Eastdale Mall AL Prattville High Point Town Ctr 550 Pinnacle Pl AL Spanish Fort Spanish Fort Twn Ctr 22500 Town Center Ave AL Tuscaloosa University Mall 1701 Macfarland Blvd E AR Fayetteville Nw Arkansas Mall 4201 N Shiloh Dr AR Fort Smith Central Mall 5111 Rogers Ave AR Jonesboro Mall @ Turtle Creek 3000 E Highland Dr Ste 516 AR North Little Rock Mc Cain Shopg Cntr 3929 Mccain Blvd Ste 500 AR Rogers Pinnacle Hlls Promde 2202 Bellview Rd AR Russellville Valley Park Center 3057 E Main AZ Casa Grande Promnde@ Casa Grande 1041 N Promenade Pkwy AZ Flagstaff Flagstaff Mall 4600 N Us Hwy 89 AZ Glendale Arrowhead Towne Center 7750 W Arrowhead Towne Center AZ Goodyear Palm Valley Cornerst 13333 W Mcdowell Rd AZ Lake Havasu City Shops @ Lake Havasu 5651 Hwy 95 N AZ Mesa Superst'N Springs Ml 6525 E Southern Ave AZ Phoenix Paradise Valley Mall 4510 E Cactus Rd AZ Tucson Tucson Mall 4530 N Oracle Rd AZ Tucson El Con Shpg Cntr 3501 E Broadway AZ Tucson Tucson Spectrum 5265 S Calle Santa Cruz AZ Yuma Yuma Palms S/C 1375 S Yuma Palms Pkwy CA Antioch Orchard @Slatten Rch 4951 Slatten Ranch Rd CA Arcadia Westfld Santa Anita 400 S Baldwin Ave CA Bakersfield Valley Plaza 2501 Ming Ave CA Brea Brea Mall 400 Brea Mall CA Carlsbad Shoppes At Carlsbad
    [Show full text]
  • \ in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
    \ IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COVER SHEET: APPLICATION FOR PROFESSIONAL COMPENSATION --------------------------------------------------------------) ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) Bradlees Stores, Inc., et al. ) Case Nos 95 B 42777 through ) 95B 42784 Debtors ) (Judge Burton R. Lifland) ) --------------------------------------------------------------) Jointly Administered Type of Application: Interim Final X ' Name of Applicant: Zolfo Cooper, LLC Authorized to Provide Professional Services to: The Debtors Date of Order Authorizing Employment: August 23, 1995 Compensation Sought: Application Date: March 19, 1999 Application Period: June 23, 1995 - February 2, 1999 Hours Amount . Fees: Professional 20,270.3 $5,530,799.00 Expense Reimbursement 491,944.14 Total $6,022,743.14 1 Fees incurred during the period from June 23, 1995 through February 2, 1999 (the “Application Period”) A summary of professional fees incurred during the Application Period, by professional, is set forth below: Name of Position Years of Hours Hourly Professional with ZC Experience Billed Rate Total Partners: S. Cooper Principal 28 7.6 $425 $3,230.00 S. Cooper 1,839.6 $395 726,642.00 S. Cooper 513.4 $375 192,525.00 D. Taura Principal 34 52.3 $375 19,612.50 M. Flynn Principal 20 2.0 $375 750.00 M. Flynn 10.0 $350 3,500.00 N. Lavin Principal 32 2.9 $395 1,145.50 N. Lavin 14.7 $375 5,512.50 N. Lavin 44.6 $350 15,610.00 N. Lavin 15.6 $325 5,070.00 Associates: P. Gund Project Manager 15 140.0 $375 52,500.00 P. Gund 1,928.8 $325 626,860.00 P.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeff Schneider
    SFA Tenant Newsletter Summer 2018 Inaugural Issue Welcome SFA Tenant Spotlight Dear Tenants : John C. Miller, III, Esquire Welcome to the inaugural issue of the John C. Miller, III is the Managing Partner of “SFA Tenant Quarterly Newsletter.” We have Mattleman, Weinroth & Miller (MWM) and created this newsletter to better inform our specializes in real estate, estate planning, tenants about news going on within our SFA succession planning, corporate formation and litigation and all other related business matters Community, your local community and for small to medium sized businesses. the ever expanding SFA property portfolio with properties in Burlington, Camden and John and the MWM team play an active role Gloucester Counties. in their community and participate in their local towns as engaged citizens while remaining We encourage you to share this newsletter cognizant of the issues that individuals and with your employees and friends. Have a businesses face every day. Former and current John C. Miller, III. Managing Partner great summer season! community partners supported by MWM Mattleman, Weinroth & Miller include The Wounded Warrior Project, The Warm regards, Animal Welfare Association of Voorhees, NJ and The Cooper Hospital Foundation, Jeff Schneider to name a few. Managing Principal For more than three decades, John has developed a niche in the areas of both Strategic Funding Alternatives, LLC residential and commercial real estate and has represented individuals buying their fi rst home, as well as new and growing small to medium sized family and corporate businesses. John’s expertise includes real estate acquisition as well as business ownership continuity, succession planning, and estate planning.
    [Show full text]
  • I Amtrak~ II Amtrak~ ~ CJCJ CJCJ CJCJ CJC)
    CAMDEN COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN DDDDDI '\ YTRANSIT D 0 0 DO 0 0 D D 0 0 DO 0 0 D ==- :::::::::: PATCO- PATCO I Amtrak~ II Amtrak~ ~ CJCJ CJCJ CJCJ CJC) DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 1997 CAMDEN COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN Final Document DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION The Bourse Building 21 South 5th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106 DECEMBER 1997 This Report is Printed on Recycled Paper CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS Jeffrey L. Nash, Freeholder Director Annette Castiglione-Degan, Freeholder Deputy Director Scott M. Goldberg, Freeholder, Department of Public Works (Divisions of Engineering and Planning) Riletta Cream Edward T. McDonnell Bernard A. Platt Frank Spencer CAMDEN COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Jeffrey L. Nash, Freeholder Director Scott M. Goldberg, Freeholder Frank Spencer, Freeholder Barry Malesich, Board Chairperson Carole Miller, Board Vice-Chairperson Robert E. Kelly, P.E., County Engineer Thomas Quackenbush William J. Controvich William J. Snyder Margaret A. Young Joseph Forte George Jones Michael Brennan, Esquire, Board Solicitor CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: Dominic J. Vesper, Jr., Director George C. Fallon, Supervisor of Roads DIVISION OF ENGINEERING: Robert E. Kelly, P.E., County Engineer DIVISION OF PLANNING: 1. Douglas Griffith, P.P., AICP, Planning Director Thomas B. Chamberlin, Supervising Planner Land Development and Review Gail Elbert, Supervising Planner Ronald Jernegan, Data Processing Technician Louise M. Sawchuk, Principal Clerk Typist DELA W ARE
    [Show full text]
  • Moorestown, Nj ±1,635 - 32,967 Sf Available for Lease Renovating / Expanding
    EAST GATE SQUARE JUST ROUTE 38 & NIXON DRIVE SIGNED MOORESTOWN, NJ ±1,635 - 32,967 SF AVAILABLE FOR LEASE RENOVATING / EXPANDING property highlights. • ±900,000 SF Power Center • Largest open-air shopping center in Philadelphia metro market • Strategically located at the intersections of Route 73, Route 38 and I-295 • Direct access from I-295 • ±199,082 people within 5 miles with an average income of $113,115/year stats. 2019 DEMOGRAPHICS* 1 MILE 3 MILES 5 MILES EST. POPULATION 4,346 76,932 203,986 EST. HOUSEHOLDS 2,115 31,133 78,394 EST. AVG. HH INCOME $100,353 $118,199 $128,735 ROUTE 38 TRAFFIC COUNT: 44,969 VPD *ESRI 2019 ROUTE 73 TRAFFIC COUNT: 79,865 VPD INTERSTATE 295 TRAFFIC COUNT: 98,882 VPD get in touch. MICHAEL GORMAN ANDREW SHPIGEL o ce 215.893.0300 o ce 215.893.0300 direct 215.282.0152 direct 215.282.0153 MetroCommercial.com | PHILADELPHIA, PA | PLYMOUTH MEETING, PA | MOUNT LAUREL, NJ | NAPLES, FL [email protected] [email protected] Phase I - Total 375,419 SF Phase V - Total 102,000 SF 38 44,969 VPD Gabe’s 30,096 SF AVAILABLE 3,500 SF AVAILABLE 13,000 SF Kids Empire 15,425 SF EASTGATE DRIVE AVAILABLE 2,104 SF AVAILABLE 11,681 SF The Home Depot 131,480 SF P.C. Richard & Son 30,000 SF ShopRite 70,714 SF ULTA Beauty 10,800 SF AVAILABLE 26,000 SF OshKosh B’gosh 2,500 SF Ross Stores 25,377 SF Buffalo Wild Wings 5,100 SF Party City 15,000 SF Panera Bread 4,800 SF AVAILABLE AVAILABLE 10,000 SF Carter’s 4,000 SF ±2,200 SF Bertucci’s 7,000 SF Vitamin Shoppe 3,400 SF I MANI-PEDI Concord Pets 7,000 SF Phase VI - Total
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) New Jersey
    Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) for New Jersey By ORF 467 Transportation Systems Analysis, Fall 2004/05 Princeton University Prof. Alain L. Kornhauser Nkonye Okoh Mathe Y. Mosny Shawn Woodruff Rachel M. Blair Jeffery R Jones James H. Cong Jessica Blankshain Mike Daylamani Diana M. Zakem Darius A Craton Michael R Eber Matthew M Lauria Bradford Lyman M Martin-Easton Robert M Bauer Neset I Pirkul Megan L. Bernard Eugene Gokhvat Nike Lawrence Charles Wiggins Table of Contents: Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction to Personal Rapid Transit .......................................................................................... 3 New Jersey Coastline Summary .................................................................................................... 5 Burlington County (M. Mosney '06) ..............................................................................................6 Monmouth County (M. Bernard '06 & N. Pirkul '05) .....................................................................9 Hunterdon County (S. Woodruff GS .......................................................................................... 24 Mercer County (M. Martin-Easton '05) ........................................................................................31 Union County (B. Chu '05) ...........................................................................................................37 Cape May County (M. Eber '06) …...............................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • Printmgr File
    Exhibit 99.2 Supplemental Financial Information For the three months ended March 31, 2019 The Macerich Company Supplemental Financial and Operating Information Table of Contents All information included in this supplemental financial package is unaudited, unless otherwise indicated. Page No. Corporate Overview 1-4 Overview 1-2 Capital Information and Market Capitalization 3 Changes in Total Common and Equivalent Shares/Units 4 Financial Data 5-11 Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) 5 Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) 6 Non-GAAP Pro Rata Financial Information (Unaudited) 7-9 2019 Guidance Range 10 Supplemental FFO Information 11 Capital Expenditures 12 Operational Data 13-27 Sales Per Square Foot 13 Sales Per Square Foot by Property Ranking 14-17 Occupancy 18 Average Base Rent Per Square Foot 19 Cost of Occupancy 20 Percentage of Net Operating Income by State 21 Property Listing 22-25 Joint Venture List 26-27 Debt Tables 28-30 Debt Summary 28 Outstanding Debt by Maturity Date 29-30 Development Pipeline 31 Corporate Information 32 This Supplemental Financial Information should be read in connection with the Company’s first quarter 2019 earnings announcement (included as Exhibit 99.1 of the Company’s Current Report on 8-K, event date May 2, 2019) as certain disclosures, definitions and reconciliations in such announcement have not been included in this Supplemental Financial Information. The Macerich Company Supplemental Financial and Operating Information Overview The Macerich Company (the “Company”) is involved in the acquisition, ownership, development, redevelopment, management and leasing of regional shopping centers located in the United States in many of the country’s most attractive, densely populated markets with significant presence on the West Coast, Arizona, Chicago and the Metro New York to Washington, DC corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Frankford-Knights to Bucks County Community College
    August 29, 2021 130 Frankford-Knights to Bucks County Community College Serving Philadelphia Mills, Neshaminy Mall and Newtown FOR MORE INFORMATION: Customer Service: 215-580-7800 TDD/TTY: 215-580-7853 www.septa.org d Swamp Rd NEWTOWN R 413 on gt Bucks lin wn ByPass 532 l to E o County w v e a D g A N l e Newtown Community Lincoln Village of R College d Industrial Commons Newtown W (Weekdays Only) Council Rock ashington Av S T l i S. C. t v t e Dr a H. S. North a S A r Tyler Park r r t y T e e R d r W ro R s o i o S hb n ic c t sant R h m ea n h Dr P e b a c Lincoln o y Run P r 332 o S 332 ss Gloria pa W N n By e tow o w Dei Plaza New o t o d wn b Rd Belle Pine St o M u v k Rd 413 Summit 213 aple A r George n e vue Buc SquareN S. C. LANGHORNE 14 School e R wn Pk w d A Woods Middle Holland Rd t v o Tollgate Rd Services eto Stone w n - St Mary Bridg Newtown L Cairn Holland yf a Medical Langhorne n University or Friends g Center 413 Village S. C. d Rd h Manor School o Core Creek 532 r n 1 e County Park LANGHORNE Holland Rd R d Neshaminy STATION k Rd H.
    [Show full text]
  • A Local Shopping Guide for Families
    B8 The Boston Globe FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2020 ComfortZone UNION SQUARE CRAIG F. WALKER/GLOBE STAFF/FILE FRUGAL BOOKSTORE BELMONT BOOKS HENRY BEAR’S PARK ERIN CLARK/GLOBE STAFF/FILE JONATHAN WIGGS/GLOBE STAFF/FILE DAVID L. RYAN/GLOBE STAFF/FILE By Kara Baskin Lilah Rose GLOBE CORRESPONDENT Locals love this Melrose spot, his year, it’s even more which is a toy store wonderland as in essential to support A local shopping days of old: shelves brimming with small, independent puzzles, classic games (Parcheesi, T businesses. It’s sooth- anyone?), Calico Critters, and more, ingly mechanical to all with curbside pickup and deliv- click over to Amazon and wait for a ery. www.lilahrosemelrose.com brown box to arrive — but that’s not going to help the thousands of guide for families The Merry Lion families around Boston who’ve This Wakefield shop sells funny poured their hopes into a small kids’ clothing (why not buy a “Pies shop, a tiny studio, a life’s passion. Boston is fortunate to have so much creative talent. Before Guys” sweatshirt for your Shop local isn’t a hashtag; it’s a life- tot?), plus toys like dinosaur play- line. It’s on us to support them this season. dough and gifts for grown-ups too. It’s not just about altruism, ei- www.shopthemerrylion.com ther. These places are genuinely amazing. Handmade bibs, 3-D ear- your gently loved books for store fault/files/diversity-catalog.pdf Nantucket Kids rings straight out of Studio 54, credit. www.book-rack.com Mom of three Andrea Romito thoughtfully curated books, on and QUIRKY & FUN owns this preppy hideout at Hing- on.
    [Show full text]
  • Brookfield Properties' Retail Group Overview
    Retail Overview Brookfield Properties’ Retail Group Overview We are Great Gathering Places. We embrace our cultural core values of Humility, Attitude, Do The Right Thing, H Together and Own It. HUMILITY Brookfield Properties’ retail group is a company focused A ATTITUDE exclusively on managing, leasing, and redeveloping high- quality retail properties throughout the United States. D DO THE RIGHT THING T TOGETHER O HEADQUARTERS CHICAGO OWN IT RETAIL PROPERTIES 160+ STATES 42 INLINE & FREESTANDING GLA 68 MILLION SQ FT TOTAL RETAIL GLA 145 MILLION SQ FT PROFORMA EQUITY MARKET CAP $20 BILLION PROFORMA ENTERPRISE VALUE $40 BILLION Portfolio Map 2 7 1 4 3 5 3 6 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 3 3 1 1 2 4 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 10 4 2 5 1 4 10 2 3 3 1 48 91 6 5 6 2 7 6 4 5 11 7 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 7 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 6 1 3 5 3 4 15 19 2 14 11 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 6 2 1 3 4 18 2 17 3 1 2 1 3 2 2 5 3 6 8 2 1 12 9 7 5 1 4 3 1 2 1 2 16 3 4 13 3 1 2 6 1 7 9 1 10 5 4 2 1 4 6 11 5 3 6 2 Portfolio Properties 1 2 3 3 3 1 7 4 Offices 13 12 2 Atlanta, GA 7 3 1 1 Chicago, IL Baltimore, MD 8 5 2 Dallas, TX 4 Los Angeles, CA 6 New York, NY 8 2 9 5 Property Listings by State ALABAMA 7 The Oaks Mall • Gainesville 3 The Mall in Columbia • Columbia (Baltimore) 9 Brookfield Place • Manhattan WASHINGTON 8 Pembroke Lakes Mall • Pembroke Pines 4 Mondawmin Mall • Baltimore 10 Manhattan West • Manhattan 1 Riverchase Galleria • Hoover (Birmingham) 1 Alderwood • Lynnwood (Seattle) 5 Towson Town Center • Towson (Baltimore) 11 Staten Island Mall • Staten Island 2 The Shoppes at Bel Air • Mobile (Fort Lauderdale)
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTA Suburban St & Transit Map Web 2021
    A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA BB CC Stoneback Rd Old n d California Rd w d Rd Fretz Rd R o t n R d Dr Pipersville o Rd Smiths Corner i Rd Run Rd Steinsburg t n w TohickonRd Eagle ta Pk Rolling 309 a lo STOCKTON S l l Hill g R Rd Kellers o Tollgate Rd in h HAYCOCK Run Island Keiser p ic Rd H Cassel um c h Rd P Portzer i Tohickon Rd l k W West a r Hendrick Island Tavern R n Hills Run Point Pleasant Tohickon a Norristown Pottstown Doylestown L d P HellertownAv t 563 Slotter Bulls Island Brick o Valley D Elm Fornance St o i Allentown Brick TavernBethlehem c w Carversvill- w Rd Rd Mervine k Rd n Rd d Pottsgrove 55 Rd Rd St Pk i Myers Rd Sylvan Rd 32 Av n St Poplar St e 476 Delaware Rd 90 St St Erie Nockamixon Rd r g St. John's Av Cabin NJ 29 Rd Axe Deer Spruce Pond 9th Thatcher Pk QUAKERTOWN Handle R Rd H.S. Rd State Park s St. Aloysius Rd Rd l d Mill End l La Cemetery Swamp Rd 500 202 School Lumberville Pennsylvania e Bedminster 202 Kings Mill d Wismer River B V Orchard Rd Rd Creek u 1 Wood a W R S M c Cemetery 1 Broad l W Broad St Center Bedminster Park h Basin le Cassel Rockhill Rd Comfort e 1100 y Weiss E Upper Bucks Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Model Evaluation: Quantifying Walmart's Sources of Advantage." Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal (Forthcoming)
    Business Model Evaluation: Quantifying Walmart’s Sources of Advantage The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Brea-Solís, Humberto, Ramon Casadesus-Masanell, and Emili Grifell-Tatjé. "Business Model Evaluation: Quantifying Walmart's Sources of Advantage." Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal (forthcoming). Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:13135315 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP Business Model Evaluation: Quantifying Walmart’s Sources of Advantage HUMBERTO BREA-SOLÍS [email protected] University of Liege (ULg) HEC Management School, B31 bld du Rectorat, 7, 4000 Liège, Belgium. RAMON CASADESUS-MASANELL1 [email protected] Harvard Business School, Morgan Hall T93, Soldiers Field Rd., Boston MA 02163, USA. EMILI GRIFELL-TATJÉ [email protected] Departament d’Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Edifici B, Campus de la UAB. Bellaterra (Cerdanyola de Vallés), Barcelona 08193, Spain. A B S T R A C T We develop an analytical framework on the basis of the economics of business performance to provide quantitative insight into the link between a firm’s business model choices and their profit consequences. The method is applied to Walmart by building a qualitative representation of its business model and mapping that representation on an analytical model that quantifies the company’s sources of advantage over time.
    [Show full text]