Ithe ARCHAEOLOGY of NORTHERN'mesopotamia; THE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ithe ARCHAEOLOGY of NORTHERN'mesopotamia; THE The archaeology of northern Mesopotamia: the Hassuna-Samarra period Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Thompson, Barry Edward, 1945- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 03/10/2021 20:02:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318239 iTHE ARCHAEOLOGY OF NORTHERN'MESOPOTAMIA; THE HASSUNA-SAMARRA PERIOD Barry Edward Thompson A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement$ For Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate - College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 9 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library, Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission,provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made, Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: , APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: J. JELINEK Date Professor of Anthropology ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I desire to express my gratitude to my parents for their support and encouragement,, ' which enabled 'the necessary research and completion of this thesis, I also wish to express my appreciation to Professor Arthur J e Jeliaek for his helpful comments and suggestions. TABLE.OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES . •. ■ , * C 0 *. 0. © 0 0 85 © © viii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . » . • 0 <9. * © © © *- * A a ix ABSTRACO? ceQocccoce « * © © ° * A • » ® X INTRODUCTION , , . , * , . « © * ©. * e © > a 1 Northern Mesopotamia @ ®" 0 © © © c c0 e © © a 2 Geographical Features & « © © © © © © 0 A '© a 3 Clxniate c ^ » c- » » a 0 s © 6 A h© © o & 1 0 Flora c- c & t> © & & & oo0 9 o s © © © © 0 © e © ■ © 14 5 au zxa e *> © © © e © © .<> <e e © 0 © © e 0 e © 1 8 Communications.and Trade © * a , © © 9 e a. 19 Previous Research « © © : ® ®. © • © < S 8 A « 29 EASSUNA-SAMARRA PERIOD © © © ° <6 © • © © © .* 3 4 Tell Hassuna © © © © © r. A e 0 0 6 3 4 Nineveh © © © © ® © •© © ® ’ e •© © © © « 0 p© • 52 Tell Arpachiyah e. « © © © © © © © 6 » © © s . O 53 Matarrah © ©©©»©■*© © e©©©©sA0 © 5 6 Tell ShemshEra © * © * , © o© c &0 0 © 0 © © 64 Sites in Northwestern Iraq © © © e© © © © o0 7 1 Umm edh-Dhiab © © ♦ ..* © © © © © 0 © * © 0 © „ ? 4 Telul eth-Thalathat © » C 0 © 0 0 « 0 @ a &0 8 7 4 Tape Gawra © © © * © © © © ©. 0 c e © S 6 6 0 0 « 77 Tell al-Khan $»©,*, © 0 ©c e©6 ©&a8 7 9 Gird All Agha © © » © » <5 0 © © e o© c© © 9 © e e 8 0 The Erbil Area © © © c © © e © © s 0 e « A e © © a « 8 1 Gird Banahilk © ®. « © « « ® 0 © © © © © © A © • a 8 ; 81 Other Sites in Northeast Iraq © © © © 0 © o 0 8 3 The Makhmur Plain © © © © © © © o © » . e© a 84 The Kirkuk Area « © ©. © 0 s e Cr0 ' © e© » 8 5 larmo # » « » © © © © © © e e © © 9 0 a 86 Samarra « © © © © © © * © s © e 0 0 » o A 0 95 Tell es-” Saw wan , , , » * © © © c © 0 » 6 9 © a 97 Biyala Sites » » © © © © o © 0 © © A 9 » e •e 1 0 ? iv V TABLE OF CONTENTS— Continued - Page Mandali Sites @10? BQ.gll0U!S 90.*€0*04666000400 60 f) XXX T o XL B l ? c ^ l C . e> <• <£> o o o o e o e e 5 e o c » » a » c c XX6 Cl'iaga.x'* BcISjSiz* & © © © © © © © © & » © « © ©■© © © © XX*7 Te .L-L TTalajL « » © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © @ © X2.0 Other Khabur Sites * « * * * , , * * * * * , . * » 122 Tell Chu&ra © © © © © © » © © © <> ©.© © © © » © © © X2J^ * Balx^h Sx u e s © « © © © * © © © © © © © © © ©©-©■©. 12jS Bouc^ras © © © » © © .« © » © © ©. © © © © © © © © © © 125. EX^KOWJB © c © © e © V © © © © © © a e ' o © © s © o 12S Tell I^iure^foxt © © » © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © X2fp? The <Tabbul Plaxn © © © » © © © © © © ©.© « © © $ © 128 X e 11 Ah mar » © © © © © © © © » © © © © © © © © © o 128 Yunnus-Carehemish ©©©*©©.©©*©©©©©©$ 129 Toll Turlu e © © © © a © © o e © » so © © go d © 129 A d x ^ a nia. n © © » « © © © © ©© » ©<>©©©©©» ©© 1^0 Mala c^ra*3’Els., isx ©©©©©«©© ©»©©©©©&©© 130 I) x v a. r X) alc.x r ©«©©© ©©«©©©©©©©<&.©■© © ■ © 131 Southeast Turkey-TiIkitepe , * © . , * * © . * © 131 TEE HASSUNA-SAMARRA'PERIOD:CORRELATIONS WITH OTHER RECIOXJS e » e » c e co e t> e « o » go b e c e » © 0 © 13 Southern Mesopotamia 133 Erxdu © © © » © © © © « © © © # .© © © © © © © .© 133 Has al ^ Amxya © © ' © » © © © © © © © © © © © © .© 138 Iran ©. » © © © © © © © © * © © © » © © © © © & © # 1^^ Khuzxstan «©©©©. ©©^©©©©©©»o©*© Central Zagros .. , * » * * * e * © * a * * $ * 147 Central Plateau-Tepe Sialk » e « * * «, * * © © 148 Northwest Iran 149 Armenia and the Antifcaurus ©©©©©©©© s©©6 IgO. Syro*31 CxXxcxa © © © » © © & © « © © © © « © © © © © 13x The. Cilician Plain ©©©©»©©»©©©©©© 134 S 3.k c 0 G o jsu "., ©a©© r©©©© ©©©© »©©e» 198 The Amuq ct©©©©©^© ©•©©©© ©© & ©©© ItS 1 Northwest Syria *©©, ©a*.,»**©** © 169 Byblos and Palestine 16? Central and Western Anatolia © » © © © © © © © © © 168 .The Aegean © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © « © © 1(59 Connections with Other .Regions * © * * * - » © , * *. 170 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS--Continued Page 4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS i 171 Previous and Cur'rd'At Interpretations 171 The Hassuna-Samarra Assemblage-. ........ $ e 183 Problems of Furture Research ........... .199 APPENDIX A; THE DISTRIBUTION OF HAS SU M AND SAMARRAN POTTERY ............. 201 Partial List of Sites with Reported Occurrences of. Archaic or Standard Hassuna Pottery . „ 202 Partial List of Sites with Reported Occurrences of Samarran Pottery ............... 204 APPENDIX B: THE DISTRIBUTION OF HALAF POTTERY . 206 Partial List of Sites with Reported Occurrences of Halaf Pottery . „ . * . 207 APPENDIX C: REPORTED OCCURRENCES OF HASSUNA, SAMARRA, AND HALAF WARES . 210 Partial List of Sites with Reported Occurrences of Hassuna, Samarra, and Halaf Wares in Northern Mesopotamia and Neighboring Regions . « 211 APPENDIX D: MATARRAH CERAMICS, SHERD COUNTS ...... 215 Matarrah Pottery, Operation IX, Sherd Count . .. 216 Matarrah Pottery, Operation ¥1, Sherd Count . « 217 Matarrah- Pottery, Operation- TT-i, Sherd Count . .. 218 APPENDIX E: AMUQ, POTTERY PHASES A-E . ........ 219 APPENDIX F: RADIOCARBON DATES . .. 220 Jarmo Radiocarbon Dates . ............ 221 Radiocarbon Dates, Northern Mesopotamia ...... 222 Radiocarbon Dates, Northern Mesopotamia and Syrp—O3LI1LC3.S .. 0 . ... 22^> Radiocarbon Dates, Western Iran .......... 224 vii TABLE OF. CONTENTS— Continued Page Radiocarbon Dates» Anatolia .,,»<>.,,<»<,» 225 APPENDIX G: CONVERSIONS . .. e . » . „ » . 226 LIST OF REFERENCES * * . „ » „ . » „ » , „ , . „ « 22? LIST OF TABLES Table Page I, Tell Hassuna, Sherd Count, Sounding 1 , e « » c » , . 39 II« Tell Hassuna Pottery, Relative Percentages of Wares, Sounding 1 ei,, . 40 IIIe Tell Hassuna, Sounding 2, Sherd Count IV. Tell Hassuna, Selected Cultural Inventory I^eve 1 s I T * 1 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . 4? V. Ma tar rah Pottery, Sherd Count . 58 VI. Matarrah, Selected Cultural Inventory i » 61 VII. Tell Shemsh&ra Pottery . 66 VIII. Tell Shemshara, Selected Cultural Inventory , , . e 69 IX. Banahilk, Selected.Cultural Inventory e 82 X. Tell es-Sawwah, Selected Cultural Inventory«... 102 XI. Relative Chronology, Southern Mesopotamia ..... e 135 XII. Relative Chronology, Iran « 144 XIII. Relative Chronology of Northern Mesopotamia a n o. the Amu c[ . , « ... , . « 153 XIV. Relative Chronology of Northern Mesopotamia, Amuo, and Anat ol%a . ■. , .. > 155 XV. The Relative Chronology of Northern Mesopotamia,! . 187 XVI. The Relative Chronology of Northern Mesopotamia,II . 188 viii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure - . Page 1 ti .Northern^Mesopotamia and the Near East *. * « , e 4 2 . Northern Mesopotamia:The Geographic Setting . * • © 6 CommUnieations Routes ............. • . 20 k. Obsidian and Copper Sources . • 25 Northern Mesopotamia;The Hassuna-Samarra Period e •• 35 6 6 Northern Mesopotamia:Halaf Sites ....... • e 6 ' 36 7* Southern Mesopotamia and Iran ......... • 6 154 8 * Approximate Correlation of Tepe Gawra and Eridu •• 141 9. Syr o ^ CI li c zl a ................. * • e ' 152 10. Hassuna-Samarra Sites ............. c 184 11. Halaf Sxtes . « . © © » . ... » © . < ° 185 12. Near Eastern Chronology * ........... 6 . 193 ix ■ ' ABSTRACT The prehistoric sequence of cultural development in 'Northern 'Mesopotamia, during the sixth and early fifth millennia B.C6 was characterised by the increasing sophistication of the village farming community. The Hassuna-Samarra assemblage was centered in Worth Iraq, which is perhaps the best known area, archaeologically during this time range, Samarran Ware is .interpreted as having developed within the Hassuna ceramic tradition and it is the distinctive ceramic ware of the'Hassuna- Samarra Period, During the Hassuna-Samarra Period,some villages appear to have been experimenting with irrigation, but most of the villages were confined to the present area of rainfall farming. Evidence of an extensive obsidian trade and the presence of copper in pre-Hassuna-Samarra
Recommended publications
  • Download The
    TOKENS Culture, Connections, Communities EDITED BY ANTONINO CRISÀ, MAIRI GKIKAKI and CLARE ROWAN ROYAL NUMISMATIC SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 57 LONDON 2019 © The authors Royal Numismatic Society Special Publication No. 57 ISBN 0 901405 35 3 All rights reserved. No parts of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopy- ing, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the authors. Typeset by New Leaf Design, Malton, Yorkshire Printed in Malta by Gutenberg Press Ltd, Tarxien, Malta CONTENTS 1 Introduction by ANTONINO CRISÀ, MAIRI GKIKAKI & CLARE ROWAN 1 2 The invention of tokens by DENISE SCHMANDT-BESSERAT 11 3 Some notes on Athenian bronze tokens and bronze coinage in the fifth and fourth centuries BC by KENNETH A. SHEEDY 19 4 Tokens inside and outside excavation contexts: seeking the origin. Examples of clay tokens from the collections of the Athens Numismatic Museum by STAMATOULA MAKRYPODI 27 5 The armour tokens from the Athenian Agora by MARTIN SCHÄFER 41 6 A rare clay token in context: a fortunate and recorded discovery from the necropolis of Tindari (Messina, 1896) by ANTONINO CRISÀ 63 7 Roman tesserae with numerals: some thoughts on iconography and purpose by ALEXA KÜTER 79 8 Lead token moulds from Rome and Ostia by CLARE ROWAN 95 9 Tokens of Antinous from the Roman province of Egypt by DENISE WILDING 111 10 Tokens in the Athenian Agora in the third century AD: Advertising prestige and civic identity in Roman Athens
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Satellite Data Sources in the Documentation and Landscape Modelling for Graeco-Roman/Byzantine Fortified Sites in the Tūr Abdin Area, Eastern Turkey
    ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume IV-2/W2, 2017 26th International CIPA Symposium 2017, 28 August–01 September 2017, Ottawa, Canada APPLYING SATELLITE DATA SOURCES IN THE DOCUMENTATION AND LANDSCAPE MODELLING FOR GRAECO-ROMAN/BYZANTINE FORTIFIED SITES IN THE TŪR ABDIN AREA, EASTERN TURKEY Kenneth Silvera *, Minna Silverb, Markus Törmä c, Jari Okkonend, Tuula Okkonene a Principal Investigator, Dr., The Institute for Digital Archaeology, Oxford, UK, [email protected] bAdj. Prof., Oulu University, Finland, [email protected], c Techn. Lic., Aalto University, Finland, [email protected] d Dr. Oulu University, Finland, [email protected] , e Dr. Oulu University, Finland, [email protected] Commission II KEY WORDS: Remote sensing, satellite images, GeoEye-1, Roman limes studies, Byzantine studies, archaeological survey, GIS ABSTRACT: In 2015-2016 the Finnish-Swedish Archaeological Project in Mesopotamia (FSAPM) initiated a pilot study of an unexplored area in the Tūr Abdin region in Northern Mesopotamia (present-day Mardin Province in southeastern Turkey). FSAPM is reliant on satellite image data sources for prospecting, identifying, recording, and mapping largely unknown archaeological sites as well as studying their landscapes in the region. The purpose is to record and document sites in this endangered area for saving its cultural heritage. The sites in question consist of fortified architectural remains in an ancient border zone between the Graeco-Roman/Byzantine world and Parthia/Persia. The location of the archaeological sites in the terrain and the visible archaeological remains, as well as their dimensions and sizes were determined from the ortorectified satellite images, which also provided coordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • An In-Depth Study of the Tell Brak Eye Idols in the 4Th Millennium BCE: with a Primary Focus on Function and Meaning
    1 The Eyes Have It An In-Depth Study of the Tell Brak Eye Idols in the 4th Millennium BCE: with a primary focus on function and meaning Honours Thesis Department of Archaeology The University of Sydney Arabella Cooper 430145722 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in the Department of Archaeology at the University of Sydney, Australia, 2016. 2 “In the present state of our knowledge there are very few archaeological discoveries which can be described as unique, but one class of objects from Brak is unique-the eye-idols or images which turned up in thousands in the grey brick stratum of the earlier Eye-Temple" M.E.L Mallowan, 1947, Excavations at Brak and Chagar Bazar, 33. Cover Image: Figures 1-5. M.E.L Mallowan, 1947, Excavations at Brak and Chagar Bazar, 33. 3 Statement of Authorship The research described in this thesis, except where referenced, is the original work of the author and was a discrete project supervised by Dr Alison Betts. This thesis has not been submitted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. No other individual’s work has been used without accurate referencing and acknowledgement in the main text of the thesis. Arabella Cooper, November 2016 4 Acknowledgments As with any major study or work, you do not toil in isolation and the writing of this thesis is no different. I first would like to thank my supervisor Professor Alison Betts, and even more so the wonderful staff at the Nicholson Museum Candace Richards and Karen Alexander for their patience and advise.
    [Show full text]
  • Hassuna Samarra Halaf
    arch 1600. archaeologies of the near east joukowsky institute for archaeology and the ancient world spring 2008 Emerging social complexities in Mesopotamia: the Chalcolithic in the Near East. February 20, 2008 Neolithic in the Near East: early sites of socialization “neolithic revolution”: domestication of wheat, barley, sheep, goat: early settled communities (ca 10,000 to 6000 BC) Mudding the world: Clay, mud and the technologies of everyday life in the prehistoric Near East • Pottery: associated with settled life: storage, serving, prestige pots, decorated and undecorated. • Figurines: objects of everyday, magical and cultic use. Ubiquitous for prehistoric societies especially. In clay and in stone. • Mud-brick as architectural material: Leads to more structured architectural constructions, perhaps more rectilinear spaces. • Tokens, hallow clay balls, tablets and early writing technologies: related to development o trade, tools of urban administration, increasing social complexity. • Architectural models: whose function is not quite obvious to us. Maybe apotropaic, maybe for sale purposes? “All objects of pottery… figments of potter’s will, fictions of his memory and imagination.” J. L. Myres 1923, quoted in Wengrow 1998: 783. What is culture in “culture history” (1920s-1960s) ? Archaeological culture = a bounded and binding ethnic/cultural unit within a defined geography and temporal/spatial “horizons”, uniformly and unambigously represented in the material culture, manifested by artifactual assemblage. pots=people? • “Do cultures actually
    [Show full text]
  • 192-210, 2011 Issn 1816-9112
    192 Research Journal of Fisheries and Hydrobiology, 6(3): 192-210, 2011 ISSN 1816-9112 ORIGINAL ARTICLES The Probability Of Zagros Mountains Environmental Pollution Due To Seismic Response Of Bakhtiari Dam Zaniar Tokmechi Department of Civil Engineering, Mahabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran. ABSTRACT The Bakhtiari Dam is a planned arch dam on the Bakhtiari River within the Zagros Mountains in Lorestan Province, Iran. At a planned height of 315 meters (1,033 ft), it will be the world's tallest dam once completed and withhold the largest reservoir in Iran. The Zagros Mountains are the largest mountain range in Iran and Iraq. With a total length of 1,500 km (932 mi), from northwestern Iran, and roughly correlating with Iran's western border, the Zagros range spans the whole length of the western and southwestern Iranian plateau and ends at the Straits of Hormuz. In this paper, the probability of environmental pollution due to heavy metals caused by Bakhtiari dam failure is studied. Finite Element and ZENGAR methods are used to analyze the probability of pollution at dam downstream. Different dam cross sections and various loading conditions are considered to study the effects of these factors on the seismic behavior of the dam. Results show that the effect of the highest cross section is not the most significant for heavy metals pollution at the dam down stream. Pollution coefficient due to stress along Y axis (Sy) is always the determinant pollution. While, in all sections Sx and Sy are the determinant parameter affecting downstream heavy metal pollution and normally are bigger than Sz.
    [Show full text]
  • OLBA XXIII (Ayrıbasım / Offprint)
    ISSN 1301 7667 MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ KILIKIA ARKEOLOJİSİNİ ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ MERSIN UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF THE RESEARCH CENTER OF CILICIAN ARCHAEOLOGY KAAM YAYINLARI OLBA XXIII (Ayrıbasım / Offprint) MERSİN 2015 KAAM YAYINLARI OLBA XXIII © 2015 Mersin Üniversitesi/Türkiye ISSN 1301 7667 Yayıncı Sertifika No: 14641 OLBA dergisi; ARTS & HUMANITIES CITATION INDEX, EBSCO, PROQUEST ve TÜBİTAK-ULAKBİM Sosyal Bilimler Veri Tabanlarında taranmaktadır. Alman Arkeoloji Enstitüsü’nün (DAI) Kısaltmalar Dizini’nde ‘OLBA’ şeklinde yer almaktadır. OLBA dergsi hakemlidir. Makalelerdeki görüş, düşünce ve bilimsel değerlendirmelerin yasal sorumluluğu yazarlara aittir. The articles are evaluated by referees. The legal responsibility of the ideas, opinions and scientific evaluations are carried by the author. OLBA dergisi, Mayıs ayında olmak üzere, yılda bir kez basılmaktadır. Published each year in May. KAAM’ın izni olmadan OLBA’nın hiçbir bölümü kopya edilemez. Alıntı yapılması durumunda dipnot ile referans gösterilmelidir. It is not allowed to copy any section of OLBA without the permit of KAAM. OLBA dergisinde makalesi yayımlanan her yazar, makalesinin baskı olarak ve elektronik ortamda yayımlanmasını kabul etmiş ve telif haklarını OLBA dergisine devretmiş sayılır. Each author whose article is published in OLBA shall be considered to have accepted the article to be published in print version and electronically and thus have transferred the copyrights to the journal OLBA.. OLBA’ya gönderilen makaleler aşağıdaki web adresinde ve bu cildin giriş sayfalarında belirtilen formatlara uygun olduğu taktirde basılacaktır. Articles should be written according the formats mentioned in the following web address. Redaktion: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Deniz Kaplan OLBA’nın yeni sayılarında yayınlanması istenen makaleler için yazışma adresi: Correspondance addresses for sending articles to following volumes of OLBA: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments, Materiality, and Meaning in the Classical Archaeology of Anatolia
    MONUMENTS, MATERIALITY, AND MEANING IN THE CLASSICAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF ANATOLIA by Daniel David Shoup A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Art and Archaeology) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Elaine K. Gazda, Co-Chair Professor John F. Cherry, Co-Chair, Brown University Professor Fatma Müge Göçek Professor Christopher John Ratté Professor Norman Yoffee Acknowledgments Athena may have sprung from Zeus’ brow alone, but dissertations never have a solitary birth: especially this one, which is largely made up of the voices of others. I have been fortunate to have the support of many friends, colleagues, and mentors, whose ideas and suggestions have fundamentally shaped this work. I would also like to thank the dozens of people who agreed to be interviewed, whose ideas and voices animate this text and the sites where they work. I offer this dissertation in hope that it contributes, in some small way, to a bright future for archaeology in Turkey. My committee members have been unstinting in their support of what has proved to be an unconventional project. John Cherry’s able teaching and broad perspective on archaeology formed the matrix in which the ideas for this dissertation grew; Elaine Gazda’s support, guidance, and advocacy of the project was indispensible to its completion. Norman Yoffee provided ideas and support from the first draft of a very different prospectus – including very necessary encouragement to go out on a limb. Chris Ratté has been a generous host at the site of Aphrodisias and helpful commentator during the writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch. 4. NEOLITHIC PERIOD in JORDAN 25 4.1
    Borsa di studio finanziata da: Ministero degli Affari Esteri di Italia Thanks all …………. I will be glad to give my theses with all my love to my father and mother, all my brothers for their helps since I came to Italy until I got this degree. I am glad because I am one of Dr. Ursula Thun Hohenstein students. I would like to thanks her to her help and support during my research. I would like to thanks Dr.. Maysoon AlNahar and the Museum of the University of Jordan stuff for their help during my work in Jordan. I would like to thank all of Prof. Perreto Carlo and Prof. Benedetto Sala, Dr. Arzarello Marta and all my professors in the University of Ferrara for their support and help during my Phd Research. During my study in Italy I met a lot of friends and specially my colleges in the University of Ferrara. I would like to thanks all for their help and support during these years. Finally I would like to thanks the Minister of Fournier of Italy, Embassy of Italy in Jordan and the University of Ferrara institute for higher studies (IUSS) to fund my PhD research. CONTENTS Ch. 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Ch. 2. AIMS OF THE RESEARCH 3 Ch. 3. NEOLITHIC PERIOD IN NEAR EAST 5 3.1. Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) in Near east 5 3.2. Pre-pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) in Near east 10 3.2.A. Early PPNB 10 3.2.B. Middle PPNB 13 3.2.C. Late PPNB 15 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mosul Dam: Turning a Potential
    Viewpoints No. 98 The Mosul Dam: Turning a Potential Disaster into a Win-Win Solution Azzam Alwash Founder and CEO, Nature Iraq April 2016 Water management issues in the Middle East will continue to be a source of tension in a region that suffers no lack of causes for conflicts. The current problems posed by the Mosul Dam may be an opportunity to show how a collaborative region-wide solution can become a first step on the road to new ways of imaginative thinking in the region. Middle East Program ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Iraq has seen its share of calamities in recent years, but none is as dangerous as the impending failure of the Mosul Dam. The dam, if it were to be breached, will result in a tsunami-like wave that would sweep through cities and hamlets along the Tigris River from Mosul to as far south as Amarah and even Basra. Baghdad would be submerged under five meters of water within four days of the breach of the dam. Not only do experts estimate the possible fatalities to range from 500,000 to over one million, but consider the logistics of trying to provide electricity, drinking water, food, hospitals, transportation, and diesel for millions of people. The reaction to this potential calamity ranges from the U.S. government’s caution, which has issued warnings to its expats to stay at least six kilometers away from the Tigris (noting that the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad is situated on the shores of the Tigris in the Green Zone), to the Iraqi government’s nonchalance, which has only calm pronouncements to offer that there is nothing wrong with the dam and that grouting operations designed to strengthen it are proceeding on schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • ROUTES and COMMUNICATIONS in LATE ROMAN and BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (Ca
    ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY TÜLİN KAYA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY JULY 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu ERCİYAS Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk SERİN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşe F. EROL (Hacı Bayram Veli Uni., Arkeoloji) Assist. Prof. Dr. Emine SÖKMEN (Hitit Uni., Arkeoloji) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Tülin Kaya Signature : iii ABSTRACT ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) Kaya, Tülin Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spatial Dimensions of Early Mesopotamian Urbanism: the Tell Brak Suburban Survey, 2003-2006
    The Spatial Dimensions of Early Mesopotamian Urbanism: The Tell Brak Suburban Survey, 2003-2006 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Ur, Jason, Philip Karsgaard, and Joan Oates. 2011. The Spatial Dimensions of Early Mesopotamian Urbanism: The Tell Brak Suburban Survey, 2003-2006. Iraq 73: 1-19. Published Version http://www.britac.ac.uk/INSTITUTES/IRAQ/journal.htm Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:5366597 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA VOLUME LXXIII • 2011 CONTENTS Editorial iii Obituaries: Dr Donny George Youkhanna, Mrs Rachel Maxwell-Hyslop v Jason Ur, Philip Karsgaard and Joan Oates: The spatial dimensions of early Mesopotamian urbanism: The Tell Brak suburban survey, 2003–2006 1 Carlo Colantoni and Jason Ur: The architecture and pottery of a late third-millennium residential quarter at Tell Hamoukar, north-eastern Syria 21 David Kertai: Kalæu’s palaces of war and peace: Palace architecture at Nimrud in the ninth century bc 71 Joshua Jeffers: Fifth-campaign reliefs in Sennacherib’s “Palace Without Rival” at Nineveh 87 M. P. Streck and N. Wasserman: Dialogues and riddles: Three Old Babylonian wisdom texts 117 Grégory Chambon and Eleanor Robson: Untouchable or unrepeatable? The upper end of
    [Show full text]
  • AN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIAN CASE STUDY a Primary
    54 RETHINKINGCERAMIC DEGENERATION: AN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIAN CASE STUDY Steven E. A primary researchconcern of archaeologists is the explanation of social change. Since archaeologists must deal with changeas itis mani- fested in the variability of material culture, itis not surprising that special attention has been givento studies of pottery, one of the most abundant forms of archaeological evidence,and onemost sensitive to tem- poral change. Unfortunately, interpretations of changingpottery reper- toires have usually failed to consider thesocioeconomic factors which also may be responsible for ceramic variation. This has been notably true when trends of change are judged to be Hdegenerative.htA study of ceramic change in the 'IJbaid and Uruk periods ofMesopotamia illustrates how can be correlated with the development of complex societies in the region. An Introduction to the Problem of Degeneration A heterodox approach to the explanation ofspecific Mesopotamian instances of supposed ceramic degenerationis-proposed in this paper for three fundamental reasons. First, traditional approaches all too often do not explain this form of change. At best they describe it and at worst, merely label it. Second, traditional approaches failto view changing material culture in light ofgreater economic frameworks which restrict behavior in all complex societies, includingour own. Third, traditional notions of degenerationare rarely explicitly defined, and tend to focus on examples of declining elegancein painted decoration to the exclusion of other aspects of ceramic change (cf.,Perkins 191+9:75). hDegeneration,hlas presently ill—defined, simply is not productive for the study of social change (cf., Lloyd 1978:45). Further,existing archaeological accounts of degenerationcommonly make the error of dealing with the resultsof change while overlooking the underlying basis of change: altered patterns of human behavior.
    [Show full text]