DOCSLIB.ORG

Q1 BROMLEY CROSS AREA FORUM MEETING, 6 May

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Q1 BROMLEY CROSS AREA FORUM MEETING, 6 May Q1 BROMLEY CROSS AREA FORUM MEETING, 6th May 2009 Present, 41 members of the public attended the meeting. Councillor Greenhalgh - Bromley Cross Ward (Chair) Councillor Wilkinson - Bromley Cross Ward Councillor Critchley - Bromley Cross Ward Also in attendance Val Cloynes - Area Co-ordinator Nicole Buhagiar - Area Working Support Officer Stephen Young - Assistant Director, Policy and Performance, Environmental Services and Development and Regeneration Services Bernard Catterall - Highways Regulation Manager, Environmental Services David Wagstaff - Public Rights of Way Team Leader, Environmental Services Richard White - Safer Neighbourhood Officer, Adult Services Esther Steel - Royal Bolton Hospital Geoffrey Minshull - Royal Bolton Hospital Inspector Mark Peary - Greater Manchester Police Chris Waters - Greater Manchester Police Helen Smith - Greater Manchester Police Nicola Holt - Greater Manchester Police Darren Meadows - Greater Manchester Police Daniel Worthington - Greater Manchester Police Brian Wiggans - Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service Page 1 of 8 Q2 Councillor Greenhalgh in the Chair. 1. INTRODUCTION AND WELCOME Councillor Greenhalgh welcomed everyone and introduced Councillors Wilkinson and Critchley. He also introduced Val Cloynes, Area Co-ordinator, Stephen Young, Chief Officer for the Bromley Cross Area Forum, and all other Council Officers present. He explained that the meeting would include an update on Printers Lane and a presentation by the new Police Inspector for the area, Mark Peary. 2. UPDATE ON PRINTERS LANE – BOLTON COUNCIL’S HIGHWAYS AND ENGINEERI NG DIVISION Bernard Catterall, Highways Regulation Manager, Environmental Services, gave an update on the situation regarding Printers Lane. This had been an ongoing issue for Bromley Cross residents and negotiations started with the land owner, Mr. Turner, in March 2008. Certain suggestions were put forward, but these would be costly to the local authority. Mr. Turner decided not to reopen Printers Lane and appointed one of the most highly regarded barristers in the country to represent him. The barrister contacted Bolton Council stating their case and drew attention to the safety of the bridge. A structural engineer from Bolton Council inspected the bridge and the conclusion was that the structure, although safe in principle, was not entirely suitable to be used by members of the public on a daily basis. Mr. Catterall informed the Forum that if the footpath was opened as a designated right of way, Bolton Council would probably be liable for any accidents that may happen. The Highways Regulation Manager informed the Forum that the structural engineer had estimated costs of £50,000 - £60,000 to repair the bridge, and other works were Page 2 of 8 Q3 estimated to be in the region of £30,000 - £40,000. If the situation was to be the subject of a public enquiry, Bolton Council would be responsible for any costs associated with this. Mr. Catterall concluded his update by stating that it was highly unlikely that the footpath would be reopened and anyone using it at the present time would be seen to be trespassing. A number of questions and comments were put to the Forum following the update which were commented on and answered on the night: - Who wanted the gates to be reopened and why? - Why had residents of Printers Lane not received any notification of the meeting? - Why was it so difficult to find out about the Area Forum meetings? - Why had Bolton Scene printed the wrong venue? - Residents had not been informed that Printers Lane would not be reopened – this could be considered as a waste of tax payer’s money if the conflict continued? - Residents were told that a meeting would be arranged to discuss the problem as Bradshaw residents would be more likely to campaign to reopen Printers Lane. - Was the land owner, Mr. Turner, informed about the Bromley Cross Area Forum and if so was he invited to attend? Resolved – That the report be noted 3. POLICE AND THE COMMUNITY Inspector Mark Peary, East Area Neighbourhood Policing Team, gave a presentation on the position of the policing team at the current time. Firstly he explained the graded response policy: Grade Immediate Attendance within 10 minutes of 1 Response call receipt Page 3 of 8 Q4 Grade Priority Attendance within 1 hour of call 2 Response receipt Grade Prompt Attendance within 4 hours of call 3 Response receipt Grade Referred Referred to division for 4 Response appropriate resolution Grade Telephone Successful and appropriate 5 Resolution telephone resolution Inspector Peary informed the Forum that Greater Manchester Police were monitored rigorously regarding their response time. He then invited all Forum attendees to view the ‘Policing Pledge’ leaflet on their tables and guided them through the contents. He then explained that the Policing Pledge was a key tool enabling them to: - Win public confidence - Provide a citizen focused service - Put people first - Closely link to their delivery of Neighbourhood Policing Inspector Peary explained that the Policing Pledge was a nationally agreed service standard adopted by all Forces across the UK. This would help them engage with the public, strengthen relationships, encourage people to report crime and ultimately improve public confidence. He also informed the Forum that the Policing Pledge was a commitment from Greater Manchester Police to the public to provide the best possible service and make Greater Manchester a safer place to live. Inspector Peary explained that the pledge had ten key themes and set out the standards of service Greater Manchester Police aspired to deliver. He also informed the Forum that the Policing Pledge would not be undertaken in isolation but as part of Greater Manchester Police’s wider strategy to deliver a high quality public service and improve public confidence. This meant it was about being proactive, engaging with the public and Page 4 of 8 Q5 ensuring the public were kept informed of progress and achievements. Following the presentation a number of questions and comments were put to Inspector Peary: - When reporting a crime, who would the initial response be from? - The P.C.S.O.s gave just as good, if not better service when approached for help. - Could more police officers be available on the streets as opposed to concentrating on office administration? Following this, Inspector Peary invited Forum attendees to split into groups to discuss public safety with the police officers present. This information was then taken away for Greater Manchester Police to analyse. Brian Wiggans, Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service, gave a brief presentation on how residents could protect themselves in advance if a fire should occur. He explained that the Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service would visit the homes of any residents who would like information regarding the best escape plan. He informed the Forum that although smoke alarms were necessary and of importance, if the residents did not have an escape route this could result in fatalities. Chris Waters, Crime Reduction Advisor, Greater Manchester Police, also gave a brief talk regarding how residents could avoid becoming victims of crime. He explained that the chances of becoming a victim of serious crime were minimal but this could occur if individuals left themselves vulnerable. He informed the Forum that 75% of burglaries occur through residents leaving doors and windows unlocked, and ultra violet pens were available to track stolen property should a household be broken into. Resolved – That the report be noted and the questions that have not been answered at the meeting be directed to the appropriate Council Department or external agency. Page 5 of 8 Q6 4. MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the meeting held on 11TH March 2009 were submitted and approved as a correct record with the exception of a brief amendment regarding the Area Forum Budget. The remaining balance was £12,023.37 as opposed to £12,023.27 5. FORUM BUDGETS UPDATE Val Cloynes, Area Co-ordinator, gave a presentation on the subject of budgets and grants available to the Bromley Cross Ward. She explained that there were now five areas to consider: - Area Based Grant - £3,110 - Area Forum Budget - £15,000 plus £12,023.37 resulting in a new total of £27,023.37 - Highways Maintenance Budget - £10,245 - Voluntary Sector Grant - £2,000 - Positive Contributions Funding - £10,000 Ms. Cloynes explained that these budgets and grants were all allocated at the discretion of the Ward Councillors and any suggestions from residents regarding how the funding could be spent would be welcomed. She also explained in more detail the new Positive Contributions Funding and informed the Forum that half of this was from Positive Activities for Young People and was for the age range 5 to 19. The remaining half was from the Youth Opportunities Fund and could only support activity for young people aged 13 to 19. The Area Co-ordinator informed the Forum that application forms would be available in the near future and it was anticipated that these would be completed by young people, and decisions made on these applications would be made by a panel including young people and Councillors. Resolved – That the report be noted Page 6 of 8 Q7 6. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS SESSION Councillor Greenhalgh introduced this item on the agenda and invited residents to ask any questions or put forward any comments they had regarding issues and concerns in the Bromley Cross area. Val Cloynes, Area Co-ordinator, began with written questions from residents: - Why was nothing being done about the poor state of the community leisure centre, especially the swimming pool facilities? Serco, apparently to not have the appropriate management skills and a comment card has been filled in regarding this. The resident was awaiting a reaction from Serco. - There was a problem with the hedgerow running alongside the public footpath that connects to the Eagley Junior School tarmaced approach footpath.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7. Industrial and Modern Resource
    Chapter 7: Industrial Period Resource Assessment Chapter 7 The Industrial and Modern Period Resource Assessment by Robina McNeil and Richard Newman With contributions by Mark Brennand, Eleanor Casella, Bernard Champness, CBA North West Industrial Archaeology Panel, David Cranstone, Peter Davey, Chris Dunn, Andrew Fielding, David George, Elizabeth Huckerby, Christine Longworth, Ian Miller, Mike Morris, Michael Nevell, Caron Newman, North West Medieval Pottery Research Group, Sue Stallibrass, Ruth Hurst Vose, Kevin Wilde, Ian Whyte and Sarah Woodcock. Introduction Implicit in any archaeological study of this period is the need to balance the archaeological investigation The cultural developments of the 16th and 17th centu- of material culture with many other disciplines that ries laid the foundations for the radical changes to bear on our understanding of the recent past. The society and the environment that commenced in the wealth of archive and documentary sources available 18th century. The world’s first Industrial Revolution for constructing historical narratives in the Post- produced unprecedented social and environmental Medieval period offer rich opportunities for cross- change and North West England was at the epicentre disciplinary working. At the same time historical ar- of the resultant transformation. Foremost amongst chaeology is increasingly in the foreground of new these changes was a radical development of the com- theoretical approaches (Nevell 2006) that bring to- munications infrastructure, including wholly new gether economic and sociological analysis, anthropol- forms of transportation (Fig 7.1), the growth of exist- ogy and geography. ing manufacturing and trading towns and the crea- tion of new ones. The period saw the emergence of Environment Liverpool as an international port and trading me- tropolis, while Manchester grew as a powerhouse for The 18th to 20th centuries witnessed widespread innovation in production, manufacture and transpor- changes within the landscape of the North West, and tation.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagley Junior School Inspection Report
    Eagley Junior School Inspection report Unique Reference Number 105188 Local Authority Bolton Inspection number 324177 Inspection dates 4–5 December 2008 Reporting inspector Liam Trippier HMI This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 7–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number on roll School (total) 227 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mr Anthony Terrible Headteacher Mrs K Wilkinson Date of previous school inspection 13 September 2005 School address Chapeltown Road Bromley Cross Bolton Lancashire BL7 9AT Telephone number 01204 333708 Fax number 01204 333709 Age group 7–11 Inspection dates 4–5 December 2008 Inspection number 324177 Inspection Report: Eagley Junior School, 4–5 December 2008 2 of 11 . © Crown copyright 2008 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. Inspection Report: Eagley Junior School, 4–5 December 2008 3 of 11 Introduction The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and one Additional Inspector. Description of the school Eagley Junior is an average sized school located to the north of Bolton.
    [Show full text]
  • North West River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 to 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the North West River Basin District
    North West river basin district Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 to 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the North West river basin district March 2016 1 of 139 Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2016 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 139 Contents Glossary and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 The layout of this document ........................................................................................................ 8 1 Sub-areas in the North West River Basin District ......................................................... 10 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 10 Management Catchments ...................................................................................................... 11 Flood Risk Areas ................................................................................................................... 11 2 Conclusions and measures to manage risk for the Flood Risk Areas in the North West River Basin District ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JBA Consulting Report Template 2015
    Greater Manchester Strategic Flood Risk Management Framework Final Report September 2018 Manchester City Council Town Hall Albert Square Manchester M60 2LA JBA Project Manager Mike Williamson JBA Consulting Mersey Bank House Barbauld Street Warrington WA1 1WA Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to V1.0 Final / 14 September 2018 GMCA, EA comments addressed David Hodcroft V1.1 Final/ 16 January 2019 GMCA Amendments David Hodcroft Contract This report describes work commissioned by David Hodcroft, on behalf of Greater Manchester Combined Authority Planning and Housing Team, by a letter dated 14 June 2017. The lead representative for the contract was David Hodcroft. Rachel Brisley, Mike Williamson and Charlotte Lloyd-Randall of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Rachel Brisley BA Dip TRP MCD MBA AMBA B ....................................................................... Associate Director Reviewed by ................................................. Mike Williamson BSc MSc EADA FRGS CGeog ....................................................................... Senior Chartered Analyst ....................................................................... Philip Bennett-Lloyd BSc Dip Mgmt CMLI MCIEEM MCIWEM CWEM CEnv Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for Greater Manchester Combined Authority. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the client for the purposes
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Regional Development Programme 1986-90
    EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England — South Yorkshire Section 7F: England — Workington Section 7G: England — Greater Manchester Section 7H: England — Greater Merseyside lUlaUmiãl· I U If ΦΟ DOCUMENT DOCUMENTI CUMENT DOCUMENTO DOK1 ¡NT ΕΓΓΡΑΦΟ DOCUMENT DI JMENTO DOCUMENT UUCUM TU ηυκυΜΕΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦΟηΐ (MENT DOCUMENTO OUCUMI MHB ΡΑΦΟΟΟΟΟΜΕΜ I tvivl COMMISSION POOGIIIÌEN^DOG OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦ( uranFrinii nni-iiupuiiiAnAni This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1987 Vol.3 : ISBN 92-825-7194-7 Vol. 1-7: ISBN 92-825-7199-8 Catalogue number: CB-98-87-00J-EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium Commission of the European Communities European Regional Development Fund UK RE6I0NAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: EngLand - South Yorkshire Section 7F: EngLand - Workington Section 7G: EngLand - Greater Manchester Section 7H: EngLand - Greater Merseyside Document This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Copyright ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels - Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. / L European Regional Development Fund UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England - South Yorkshire d UCJ [ \j \ 1' UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 CONTENTS The Programme consists of detailed information on regional or sub-regional areas (Sections 7 to 10) preceded by general information on the United Kingdom (Sections 1 to 6).
    [Show full text]
  • A4 LEAFLET 19/07/2018 10:20 Page 1
    LDV WALKING LEAFLET APRIL18v3_A4 LEAFLET 19/07/2018 10:20 Page 1 FOLLOW Helping everyone to respect, protect FREE THE and enjoy our countryside: Countryside Countryside Walks Code • Be safe - Always plan ahead and be prepared, Guide As it is seen today was originally wear the correct clothing for the time of year and converted from a group of derelict follow any local signs 17th century farm buildings known as “Orrell Fold”. The name of • Leave gates, farm animals, machinery and property as you find them “Orrell” dates back far beyond modern records, but it is generally and follow paths unless wider access is available believed that the Orrell family held the Manor of Turton from circa • Protect plants and wildlife and leave no trace of your visit and take 1420, when the Lord of the Manor, John de Torbock, died and was your litter home succeeded by William Orrell. The title was then passed down • Keep dogs under close control and ensure they do not disturb wildlife, through successive generations of the Orrell family, all of whom farm animals, horses or other people by keeping it under effective control resided at Turton Tower. • Consider the local community and other people enjoying the outdoors Turton Tower is a distinctive Grade 1 listed English country house located on the edge of the West Pennine Moors. Originally built by More than just a hotel... the Tudor Orrell family to defend their land, it later became a grand • Courtyard Restaurant & Bar • Village Tea Shop • Drop Inn home and was extended in both the Tudor and early Stuart periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Planning Applications 2011
    Directorate of Place and Community Register of Planning Applications Received 2011 Growth and Development Services 52 Derby Street Ormskirk Lancs L39 2DF www.westlancs.gov.uk/planning Planning Application Register as at 24/09/2021 19:20:07 1 of 298 pages Application No: 2011/1373/HR Location Bannister Farm, 4 Bannister Lane, Bispham, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L40 3SR Proposal Hedgerow Removal Notice - Due to construction of slurry store, because of NVZ Regulations the field shown on map is too small to allow large numbers of cattle to cross into neighbours fields. Location of hedge marked in orange on plan. Ward Parbold Parish: Hilldale Date Valid 10/01/2012 Environmental statement required: No Applicant: D & E Monk Agent: N/A Applicant Bannister Farm, Bannister Address: Lane, Bispham, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L40 3SR Decision: Hedgerow Removal Allowed Decision date: 02/02/2012 Appeal lodged: No Section 106 Agreement: No Application No: 2011/1372/NMA Location Pavilion, Blaguegate Playing Fields, Railway Road, Skelmersdale, Lancashire, Proposal Non-material amendments to planning permission 2011/0346/FUL - Windows removed from side elevation; windows and door swapped; windows removed from front elevation and main entrance altered; heat pump added to side elevation and a cooler unit added to the rear elevation. Ward Skelmersdale South Parish: Unparished - Skelmersdale Date Valid 22/12/2011 Environmental statement required: No Applicant: Mr J Mallinson Agent: Mark Cowing Architect Applicant Lathom Vale Business Park, Agent Address: 169 Burscough Street, Address: Vale Lane, Lathom, Ormskirk, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L39 Lancashire, L40 6JH 2EP Decision: Non Material Amendment Decision date: 17/01/2012 Approved Appeal lodged: No Section 106 Agreement: No Application No: 2011/1371/FUL Location Barn 2, Gerard Hall, Prescot Road, Aughton, Lancashire, L39 6TA Proposal Variation of Condition No.2 imposed on planning permission 2011/0695/COU to allow the development to be carried out in accordance with details shown on plan reference 2048/REV/1a.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagley Junior School
    Company Registration No. 07986218 (England and Wales) EAGLEY JUNIOR SCHOOL (A COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE) ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 AUGUST 2020 EAGLEY JUNIOR SCHOOL CONTENTS Page Reference and administrative details 1 Governors' report 2 - 13 Governance statement 14 - 17 Statement on regularity, propriety and compliance 18 Statement of governors' responsibilities 19 Independent auditor's report on the accounts 20 - 22 Independent reporting accountant's report on regularity 23 - 24 Statement of financial activities including income and expenditure account 25 Balance sheet 26 Statement of cash flows 27 Notes to the accounts including accounting policies 28 - 47 EAGLEY JUNIOR SCHOOL REFERENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS Members Mr M Hayes Mrs N Ashton Mr M Taylor Mrs L Hounslea Dr H Yates (Resigned 6th September 2019) Governors Mr M Hayes (Chair) Mr M Taylor (Headteacher and Accounting Officer) Mrs L Hounslea Mr D Warbrick Ms M L B Hickman Mrs K Hall Mrs J Roberts (Resigned 4 November 2019) Mr R T Tretheway (Resigned 4 December 2019) Mrs N Ashton (Appointed 1 September 2019) Mr M Flannery (Appointed 1 September 2019) Mr P Birchall (Appointed 1 October 2019) Miss L Mclauglin (Appointed 1 October 2019 and resigned 15 February 2020) Mrs J Barrow (Appointed 5 November 2019) Mrs R Murphy (Appointed 1 September 2020) Mrs P O'Donnell (Appointed 1 September 2020) Senior management team - Headteacher Mr M Taylor - Deputy Headteacher Mr N Gandhi (Appointed 1 September 2019) - Senior Teacher Miss M Dawber - Senior Teacher Miss
    [Show full text]
  • Core Strategy Development Plan Document Adopted 2 March 2011
    Local Development Framework Bolton’s Core Strategy Development Plan Document Adopted 2 March 2011 Shaping the future of Bolton Shaping the future of Bolton 3 List of policies Policy Name Page H1 Healthy 23 A1 Achieving 25 P1 Employment 29 P2 Retail and leisure 31 P3 Waste 33 P4 Minerals 35 P5 Accessibility 37 S1 Safe 38 CG1 Cleaner and greener 41 CG2 Sustainable design and construction 44 CG3 The built environment 47 CG4 Compatible uses 48 SC1 Housing 51 SC2 Cultural and community provision 53 TC1 Civic and retail core 56 TC2 St Helena 57 TC3 St Peter’s 57 TC4 Trinity Gateway 58 TC5 Cultural Quarter 60 TC6 Knowledge Campus 61 TC7 Merchant ’s Quarter 62 TC8 Church Wharf 64 TC9 Little Bolton 64 TC10 Urban Village 65 TC11 Design in the town centre 66 RA1 Inner Bolton 69 RA2 Farnworth 71 RA3 Breightmet 73 M1 Horwich Loco Works 76 M2 Horwich Loco Works 76 M3 Broad location for employment development 78 M4 Middlebrook 79 M5 Parklands and the Lostock Industrial Area 80 M6 Wingates Industrial Estate 80 M7 The M61 corridor built environment 80 OA1 Horwich and Blackrod 83 OA2 Retail and leisure uses at Middlebrook 84 OA3 Westhoughton 85 OA4 West Bolton 86 OA5 North Bolton 88 OA6 Little Lever and Kearsley 90 LO1 Links to other areas 93 IPC1 Infrastructure and planning contributions 96 See also: Appendix 1 - Policy Summary 102 Bolton’s Core Strategy 4 Local Development Framework Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 6 Chapter 2 Spatial portrait and issues 9 Chapter 3 Spatial vision and objectives 17 Chapter 4 Strategic Policies 23 Healthy Bolton 23 Achieving
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Manchester Act 1981
    Greater Manchester Act 1981 CHAPTER ix LONDON HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE Greater Manchester Act 1981 CHAPTER ix ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Citation and .commencement. 2. Interpretation. 3. Appointed day. PART II EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES 4. Advances for land acquisition or building work. 5. Loans for management of land. 6. Grants for industrial purposes. 7. Further power to assist industry. 8. Guarantee of rents, etc., of industrial buildings. 9. Duration of Part TI. c. ix Greater Manchester Act 1981 PART III LANDS, OPEN SPACES AND MUNICIPAL PROPERTY Section 10. Disposal of lost and uncollected property. 11. Byelaws as to leisure centres. 12. Closure of parks. 13. Provision of parking places in parks, etc. 14. Provision of vehicles in parks, etc. 15. Contribution towards provision of recreational facilities. 16. As to certain parks and recreation grounds. PART IV HIGHWAYS 17. Highway amenities. 18. Regulation of placing things on footway. 19. Power to provide kiosks, etc. 20. Buildings under highways. 21. Recovery of street works charges where owner unknown. 22. Street numbers. 23. Interference with property of local authorities, etc. 24. Provision of trees and shrubs. 25. hnprovement lines. 26. Prohibition of parking of goods vehicles in residential streets. 27. Control of verges. 28. Temporary stoppage of footpaths and bridleways. 29. Vesting of former highway land. PART V PUBLIC HEALTH 30. Hairdressers and barbers. 31. Registration of hawkers of food and their premises. 32. Acupuncturists, tattooists, ear-piercers, electrolysists, etc. 33. Definition of" inhabitant" in Act of 1936. 34. Dust, etc., from building operations. 35. Carrying or storage of waste food.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment of United Utilities’ Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017
    United Utilities Strategic Environmental Assessment of United Utilities’ Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017 Environmental Report January 2017 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Client: United Utilities Title: Strategic Environmental Assessment of United Utilities’ Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017: Environmental Report Project No: CC1355 Date of Issue: 09 January 2017 Version No: 1.3 Produced By Authorised for Release By ……………………………….. …………………………………… Dr Anne Fairhead Liz Baker Senior Environmental Scientist Managing Consultant CONTACT DETAILS CASCADE CONSULTING Enterprise House Manchester Science Park Lloyd St North Manchester M15 6SE Tel: 0161 227 9777 Fax: 0161 227 1777 United Utilities SEA of United Utilities’ Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017 Environmental Report Final THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Cascade Consulting United Utilities SEA of United Utilities’ Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017 Environmental Report Final Contents Non-Technical Summary 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Purpose of Report .................................................................................. 1 1.2 Application of SEA to Drought Planning ......................................................................... 2 1.3 UU’s Water Supply System, Water Resource Management and Drought Planning ....... 6 1.4 UU’s Drought Planning Process and Drought Options .................................................. 10 1.5 Drought Permit/Order Environmental Studies ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Costs of Environmental Infrastructure Needs to Meet the North West Regional Spatial Strategy
    Costs of Environmental Infrastructure Needs to Meet the North West Regional Spatial Strategy Resource Efficiency science programme Science report: SC060067 The Environment Agency is the leading public body protecting and improving the environment in England and Wales. It’s our job to make sure that air, land and water are looked after by everyone in today’s society, so that tomorrow’s generations inherit a cleaner, healthier world. Our work includes tackling flooding and pollution incidents, reducing industry’s impacts on the environment, cleaning up rivers, coastal waters and contaminated land, and improving wildlife habitats. This report is the result of research commissioned and funded by the Environment Agency’s Science Programme. Published by: Author(s): Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Scott Bringloe, ARUP Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4UD Rory Carnavan, ARUP Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 Tim Durant, ARUP www.environment-agency.gov.uk Emilie Lagacé, ARUP Amanda Norris, ARUP ISBN: 978-1-84911-077-8 Simon Marvin, SURF © Environment Agency – July 2009 Dissemination Status: Publicly available / released to all regions All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Keywords: Environmental infrastructure, Housing, Water The views and statements expressed in this report are Resources, Water Quality, Waste, Flooding. those of the author alone. The views or statements expressed in this publication do not necessarily Research Contractor: represent the views of the Environment Agency and the Arup North West Environment Agency cannot accept any responsibility for St-James’ Buildings such views or statements. Oxford Street Manchester, M1 6EL This report is printed on Cyclus Print, a 100% recycled +44 (0)161 228 2331 stock, which is 100% post consumer waste and is totally chlorine free.
    [Show full text]