Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Bolton

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Bolton Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Bolton Report to The Electoral Commission October 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 356 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 2 Current electoral arrangements 13 3 Draft recommendations 17 4 Responses to consultation 19 5 Analysis and final recommendations 21 6 What happens next? 45 Appendices A Final recommendations for Bolton: detailed mapping 47 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 49 C First draft of the electoral change Order for Bolton 51 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them. Members of the Committee are: Pamela Gordon (Chair) Professor Michael Clarke CBE Robin Gray Joan Jones CBE Ann M. Kelly Professor Colin Mellors Archie Gall (Director) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England. Our aim is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor in an area is as nearly as possible the same, taking into account local circumstances. We can recommend changes to ward boundaries, the number of councillors and ward names. We can also recommend changes to the electoral arrangements of parish and town councils. This report sets out our final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for the borough of Bolton. 5 6 Summary We began a review of Bolton’s electoral arrangements on 14 May 2002. We published our draft recommendations for electoral arrangements on 25 February 2003, after which we undertook an eight-week period of consultation. We now submit final recommendations to The Electoral Commission. • This report summarises the representations that we received during consultation on our draft recommendations, and contains our final recommendations to The Electoral Commission. We found that the existing arrangements provide unequal representation of electors in Bolton: • In seven of the 20 wards the number of electors represented by each councillor varies by more than 10% from the average for the borough, and three wards vary by more than 20% from the average. • By 2006 this situation is expected to stay the same, with the number of electors per councillor forecast to vary by more than 10% from the average in seven wards and by more than 20% in three wards. Our main final recommendations for future electoral arrangements (see Tables 1 and 2 and paragraphs 143–144) are that: • Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council should have 60 councillors, the same as at present; • there should be 20 wards, the same as at present; • the boundaries of all of the existing wards should be modified. The purpose of these proposals is to ensure that, in future, each borough councillor represents approximately the same number of electors, bearing in mind local circumstances. • The number of electors per councillor in none of the proposed 20 wards would vary by more than 7% from the borough average. • An improved level of electoral equality is forecast to continue, with the number of electors per councillor in all wards expected to vary by no more than 7% from the average for the borough in 2006. Recommendations are also made for changes to parish council electoral arrangements which provide for: • revised warding arrangements and an increase in the number of councillors for the parishes of Horwich and Westhoughton. 7 All further correspondence on these final recommendations and the matters discussed in this report should be addressed to The Electoral Commission, which will not make an Order implementing them before 25 November 2003. The information in the representations will be available for public access once the Order has been made. The Secretary The Electoral Commission Trevelyan House Great Peter Street London SW1P 2HW Fax: 020 7271 0667 Email: [email protected] (This address should only be used for this purpose.) Table 1: Final recommendations: summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas Large map councillors reference 1 Astley Bridge 3 Part of Astley Bridge ward; part of Central ward 2 2 Bradshaw 3 Part of Bradshaw ward; part of Breighmet ward 2 3 Breightmet 3 Part of Bradshaw ward; part of Breighmet ward 2 & 4 4 Bromley Cross 3 Part of Bromley Cross ward; part of Bradshaw ward 2 5 Central 3 Part of Central ward; part of Halliwell ward 2 & 4 6 Crompton 3 Part of Astley Bridge ward; part of Central ward; part of Tonge 2 & 4 ward 7 Farnworth 3 Part of Farnworth ward; part of Burnden ward 4 8 Great Lever 3 Part of Burnden ward; part of Derby ward 4 9 Harper Green 3 Harper Green ward; part of Burnden ward; part of Farnworth 4 ward 10 Heaton & Lostock 3 Part of Blackrod ward; part of Deane-cum-Heaton ward; part of 1, 2, 3 & 4 Hulton Park ward 11 Horwich & Blackrod 3 The parish of Blackrod; the proposed Horwich South West 1 & 3 parish ward of Horwich parish; part of Blackrod ward 12 Horwich North East 3 The proposed Horwich North East parish ward of Horwich 1 parish 13 Hulton 3 Part of Daubhill ward; part of Deane-cum-Heaton ward; part of 3 & 4 Hulton Park ward 14 Kearsley 3 Kearsley ward; part of Farnworth ward 4 15 Little Lever & Darcy 3 Part of Breightmet ward; part of Burnden ward; part of Little 4 Lever Lever ward 16 Rumworth 3 Part of Daubhill ward; part of Deane-cum-Heaton ward; part of 4 Derby ward 17 Smithills 3 Smithills ward; part of Astley Bridge ward; part of Deane-cum- 1, 2 & 4 Heaton ward; part of Halliwell ward 18 Tonge with the 3 2 & 4 Part of Burnden ward; part of Central ward; part of Tonge ward Haulgh 19 Westhoughton North 3 The proposed Chequerbent, White Horse and Wingates parish 1 & 3 & Chew Moor wards of Westhoughton parish; part of Blackrod ward; part of Hulton Park ward 20 Westhoughton South 3 The proposed Central, Daisy Hill and Hoskers & Hart Common 3 parish wards of Westhoughton parish Notes: 1. The wards in the above table are illustrated on Map 2 and the large maps. 2. We have made a number of minor boundary amendments to ensure that existing ward boundaries adhere to ground detail. These changes do not affect any electors. 9 Table 2: Final recommendations for Bolton Ward name Number Electorate Number of Variance Electorate Number of Variance of councillors (2001) electors from (2006) electors from per average per average councillor % councillor % 1 Astley Bridge 3 10,418 3,473 1 10,496 3,499 0 2 Bradshaw 3 9,685 3,228 -6 9,777 3,259 -7 3 Breightmet 3 10,703 3,568 4 10,727 3,576 2 4 Bromley Cross 3 10,621 3,540 3 11,169 3,723 7 5 Central 3 10,335 3,445 0 10,567 3,522 1 6 Crompton 3 10,368 3,456 1 10,380 3,460 -1 7 Farnworth 3 10,899 3,633 6 11,131 3,710 6 8 Great Lever 3 9,877 3,292 -4 10,126 3,375 -3 9 Harper Green 3 10,253 3,418 0 10,387 3,462 -1 10 Heaton & Lostock 3 10,794 3,598 5 10,887 3,629 4 11 Horwich & Blackrod 3 9,544 3,181 -7 10,260 3,420 -2 12 Horwich North East 3 10,274 3,425 0 10,427 3,476 0 13 Hulton 3 10,573 3,524 3 10,701 3,567 2 14 Kearsley 3 10,742 3,581 4 10,847 3,616 4 Little Lever & Darcy 15 3 9,783 3,261 -5 10,117 3,372 -3 Lever 16 Rumworth 3 10,504 3,501 2 10,479 3,493 0 17 Smithills 3 10,678 3,559 4 10,763 3,588 3 Tonge with the 18 3 10,160 3,387 -1 10,160 3,387 -3 Haulgh Westhoughton North 19 3 9,867 3,289 -4 10,073 3,358 -4 & Chew Moor 20 Westhoughton South 3 9,745 3,248 -5 10,030 3,343 -4 Totals 60 205,823 – – 209,504 – – Averages – – 3,430 – – 3,492 – Note: The ‘variance from average’ column shows by how far, in percentage terms, the number of electors per councillor varies from the average for the borough. The minus symbol (-) denotes a lower than average number of electors. Figures have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 10 1 Introduction 1 This report contains our proposals for the electoral arrangements for the borough of Bolton. We are reviewing the ten metropolitan boroughs in Greater Manchester as part of our programme of periodic electoral reviews (PERs) of all 386 principal local authority areas in England.
Recommended publications
  • Inspection of Harper Green School Harper Green Road, Farnworth, Bolton, Lancashire BL4 0DH
    School report Inspection of Harper Green School Harper Green Road, Farnworth, Bolton, Lancashire BL4 0DH Inspection dates: 4–5 February 2020 Overall effectiveness Requires improvement The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Not previously inspected under section 5 Previous inspection grade of the Education Act 2005 What is it like to attend this school? Pupils enjoy coming to school. The pupils that we spoke with said that they feel safe in school. Staff and parents and carers agree with this view. Pupils wear their uniform with pride. They are typically polite and courteous to adults and to each other. Most pupils behave well. Sometimes, there is disruption to learning, but pupils said that staff deal with poor behaviour and incidents of bullying consistently and fairly. Pupils are benefiting from an improved quality of education. In most subjects, teachers and leaders have high expectations of pupils. That said, pupils cannot achieve as well as they should because some subjects are not well planned or delivered. Pupils are very appreciative of the pastoral support they receive. They particularly value the highly effective careers information, advice and guidance that they receive. They said that this motivates them to work hard so that they can realise their dreams. Pupils enjoy attending a wide range of activities on a broad range of themes, such as astronomy, geography, fishing, badminton and music. Pupils are encouraged to try an activity that they have not done before through the ‘Commitments’ programme. What does the school do well and what does it need to do better? Staff are proud to work at the school and pupils are proud to be all things ‘Harper’.
    [Show full text]
  • Free School Application Form 2013 Mainstream and 16 to 19
    Free School Application Form 2013 Mainstream and 16 to 19 THE EDDIE DAVIES EDUCATIONAL TRUST SCHOOL (BOLTON) 1 Contents Contents ...................................................................................................................... 2 Application checklist .................................................................................................... 3 Declaration .................................................................................................................. 5 Section A: Applicant details ......................................................................................... 6 Section B: Outline of the school .................................................................................. 6 Section C: Education vision ......................................................................................... 6 Section D: Education plan – part 1 ............................................................................ 20 Section D: Education plan – part 2 ............................................................................ 21 Section E: Evidence of need – part 1 ........................................................................ 51 Section E: Evidence of need – part 2 ........................................................................ 52 Section F: Capacity and capability ............................................................................ 64 Section G: Budget planning and affordability ............................................................ 78 Section H: Premises
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Industrial and Modern Resource
    Chapter 7: Industrial Period Resource Assessment Chapter 7 The Industrial and Modern Period Resource Assessment by Robina McNeil and Richard Newman With contributions by Mark Brennand, Eleanor Casella, Bernard Champness, CBA North West Industrial Archaeology Panel, David Cranstone, Peter Davey, Chris Dunn, Andrew Fielding, David George, Elizabeth Huckerby, Christine Longworth, Ian Miller, Mike Morris, Michael Nevell, Caron Newman, North West Medieval Pottery Research Group, Sue Stallibrass, Ruth Hurst Vose, Kevin Wilde, Ian Whyte and Sarah Woodcock. Introduction Implicit in any archaeological study of this period is the need to balance the archaeological investigation The cultural developments of the 16th and 17th centu- of material culture with many other disciplines that ries laid the foundations for the radical changes to bear on our understanding of the recent past. The society and the environment that commenced in the wealth of archive and documentary sources available 18th century. The world’s first Industrial Revolution for constructing historical narratives in the Post- produced unprecedented social and environmental Medieval period offer rich opportunities for cross- change and North West England was at the epicentre disciplinary working. At the same time historical ar- of the resultant transformation. Foremost amongst chaeology is increasingly in the foreground of new these changes was a radical development of the com- theoretical approaches (Nevell 2006) that bring to- munications infrastructure, including wholly new gether economic and sociological analysis, anthropol- forms of transportation (Fig 7.1), the growth of exist- ogy and geography. ing manufacturing and trading towns and the crea- tion of new ones. The period saw the emergence of Environment Liverpool as an international port and trading me- tropolis, while Manchester grew as a powerhouse for The 18th to 20th centuries witnessed widespread innovation in production, manufacture and transpor- changes within the landscape of the North West, and tation.
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Forum Area Forum
    Q1 HARPER GREEN AREA FORUM MEETING, 7th May 2009 Present – 30 members of the public attended the meeting. Councillor - Harper Green Ward Williamson(Chair) Councillor Clare - Harper Green Ward Councillor Mistry Harper Green Ward Also in attendance Adrian Wolstenholme - Area Co-ordinator David Spencer - Area Working Support Officer Jeff Smethurst - Chief Officer Nick Fisher - Environmental Services Janett Sheddon - Community Safety Beverley Andrew - Royal Bolton Hospital Keith Brindle - Royal Bolton Hospital Insp Stuart Wrudd - Greater Manchester Police PC Gary Howard - Greater Manchester Police PC Paul Nickeas - Greater Manchester Police PCSO Fitzgibbon - Greater Manchester Police PCSO Derek Swift - Greater Manchester Police Councillor Williamson in the Chair. Page 1 of 4 Q2 1. INTRODUCTION Councillor Williamson opened the meeting by welcoming everyone to the event then introducing himself, Fellow Councillors from the Harper Green ward and the Bolton Council officers and partners. 2. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the previous meeting held on 18th February 2009 were submitted and signed as a correct record. 3. POLICING AND ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR UPDATE Inspector Stuart Wrudd gave a presentation on the current policing and anti social behaviour issues in the south area policing team. He advised attendees at the Area Forum that they had the largest policing team in the Bolton Borough. He went on to say that the south area was made up of four areas: Great Lever Harper Green Highfield Minerva Road Inspector Wrudd then informed residents of the crime figures between January 2009 and April 2009 and compared them with the same period for 2008, the following crimes were covered: Burglary Robbery Vehicle Crime Anti Social Behaviour Criminal Damage Page 2 of 4 Q3 Inspector Wrudd then advised residents that a third of all vehicle crime was due to items of value being left on show.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagley Junior School Inspection Report
    Eagley Junior School Inspection report Unique Reference Number 105188 Local Authority Bolton Inspection number 324177 Inspection dates 4–5 December 2008 Reporting inspector Liam Trippier HMI This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 7–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number on roll School (total) 227 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mr Anthony Terrible Headteacher Mrs K Wilkinson Date of previous school inspection 13 September 2005 School address Chapeltown Road Bromley Cross Bolton Lancashire BL7 9AT Telephone number 01204 333708 Fax number 01204 333709 Age group 7–11 Inspection dates 4–5 December 2008 Inspection number 324177 Inspection Report: Eagley Junior School, 4–5 December 2008 2 of 11 . © Crown copyright 2008 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. Inspection Report: Eagley Junior School, 4–5 December 2008 3 of 11 Introduction The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and one Additional Inspector. Description of the school Eagley Junior is an average sized school located to the north of Bolton.
    [Show full text]
  • North West River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 to 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the North West River Basin District
    North West river basin district Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 to 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the North West river basin district March 2016 1 of 139 Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2016 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 139 Contents Glossary and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 The layout of this document ........................................................................................................ 8 1 Sub-areas in the North West River Basin District ......................................................... 10 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 10 Management Catchments ...................................................................................................... 11 Flood Risk Areas ................................................................................................................... 11 2 Conclusions and measures to manage risk for the Flood Risk Areas in the North West River Basin District ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester Sub-Regional Assessment Appendix B – Supporting Information “Living Document” June 2008 Association of Greater Manchester Authorities SFRA – Sub-Regional Assessment Revision Schedule Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester June 2008 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 August 2007 DRAFT Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 02 December DRAFT FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales 2007 Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 03 June 2008 FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Anita Longworth Alan Houghton Principal Planner Head of Planning North West Scott Wilson St James's Buildings, Oxford Street, Manchester, This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's M1 6EF, appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson United Kingdom accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, Tel: +44 (0)161 236 8655 or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Cabinet Member – Regeneration and Resources Portfolio
    EXECUTIVE CABINET MEMBER – REGENERATION AND RESOURCES PORTFOLIO A record of decisions made by the Executive Cabinet Member with responsibility for the Regeneration and Resources Portfolio:- MEETING, 15th JANUARY, 2018 Following consideration of the matters detailed below in the presence of:- Councillor Adia - Executive Cabinet Member Regeneration and Resources Portfolio Councillor J. Byrne - Cabinet Member for Culture, Youth and Sport Councillor Cox - Major Opposition Spokesperson Officers Mr. T. Oakman - Chief Executive Mr. S. Young - Director of Place Ms. H. Gorman - Borough Solicitor Ms. S. Johnson - Borough Treasurer Mr. P. Green - Assistant Director Economic Development and Regeneration Ms. R. Tanner - Assistant Director – Adult Services Mr. G. Gallagher - Head of Policy, Performance and Communications Ms. L. Butcher - Head of Finance Mr. A. Chalmers - Principal Development Officer (Planning) Mrs. V. Ridge - Democratic Services Manager 67. MONITORING OF EXECUTIVE MEMBER DECISIONS The Borough Solicitor submitted a report which provided an update on decisions taken at previous meetings of the Executive Cabinet Member. The Executive Cabinet Member NOTED the report. 68. GREATER MANCHESTER PARTNERSHIP MIPIM 2018 The Director of Place submitted a report which sought the Executive Cabinet Member’s approval for Bolton Council to participate, in association with identified partners, in MIPIM 2018 as part of the Greater Manchester Partnership. The report advised that MIPIM was the world’s premier real estate and it brought together the most influential decision makers in the industry and offered access to the largest showcase of development opportunities during the event. As a result, it was felt appropriate for the Council to attend next year’s event which would be held from 13th to 16th March, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • See Over I T D O S O H D S a T E G G O E E
    Bolton.qxp_Bolton417000 08/07/2019 11:53 Page 1 417000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 6 5 4 2 1 9 3 O 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 O E 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Charter's Moss Plantation 3 R N F A I E L S L T D W O Edgworth A N H E S S Turton K Y B A Whittles W A Heights W A N Wayoh W H K Reservoir O R D O A A D E M G R H EE A N R S B A O R U M R S LA R . Top o' th' Meadow O A Plantation D B U R Y R STONES BANK ROAD O A D S 416000 416000 Hawkshaw Wood B D L EGERTON ROA A C K B Hall Shore U R N Cheetham Turton R Close LO O H Bottoms NG A I W D G OR H TH S RO T AD R T E E E E T R T S Chapeltown R Delph Dimple E L Reservoir A V K E R N A P A E T L L C P I W A IM R D C T H S O R X S K I E G D R D W A I E B S D E H U H R N Bra Y U d R sha R R E O w Y R I B A ro R U L D D O A S ok B C A N L D S E .
    [Show full text]
  • School Bus Services in Bolton September 2019 to July 2020
    7 School Bus Services in Bolton September 2019 to July 2020 Journeys in this leaflet operate on schooldays only, unless otherwise stated. Although provided primarily for school students, members of the public may use these services with the exception of Yellow School Buses. Services are listed alphabetically under school names. An introduction to School buses and concessionary fares for students in Greater Manchester Passengers can pay a fare to the driver for each journey shown on this timetable. However, students will need to show an IGO pass to travel at the concessionary (reduced) fare. If students do not have an IGO pass, they will have to pay a higher fare. Most of the journeys shown in this timetable are funded by Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM). The majority of TfGM funded services charge a standard fare and also offer daily return tickets. In some cases, the return ticket can also be used for travel on other journeys which serve similar areas – even if it is provided by a different operator. On most services, students can also buy a weekly scholar’s ticket, which costs £7.40. These are ONLY valid on schooldays on school buses and are available from the bus driver on all services where they are applicable. To help the driver, please try to have the correct fare when buying your ticket. A summary of fares and ticketing information on all school services included in this timetable can be found at https://www.tfgm.com/tickets-and-passes/bus-school-bus-services There are also a small number of TfGM funded services where the operator sets the fares.
    [Show full text]
  • FIXTURES 21/22 Officialbwfc | Officialbwfc | Officialbwfc
    Bolton Wanderers Football Club BUS SERVICE OFFICIAL FIXTURES 21/22 officialbwfc | OfficialBWFC | officialbwfc www.eticketing.co.uk/bwfc Date Opponents V KO F A Date Opponents V KO F A August January SAT 7 MILTON KEYNES DONS H 15:00 SAT 1 ROTHERHAM UNITED A 15:00 TUE 10 BARNSLEY CARABAO CUP ONE H 20:00 WED 5 CARABAO CUP SEMI-FINAL (1) SAT 14 A.F.C. WIMBLEDON A 15:00 SAT 8 CAMBRIDGE UNITED OR EMIRATES FA CUP 3 H 15:00 TUE 17 LINCOLN CITY A 19:45 WED 12 CARABAO CUP SEMI-FINAL (2) SAT 21 OXFORD UNITED H 15:00 SAT 15 IPSWICH TOWN H 15:00 WED 25 CARABAO CUP TWO SAT 22 SHREWSBURY TOWN A 15:00 SAT 28 CAMBRIDGE UNITED A 15:00 SAT 29 SUNDERLAND** H 15:00 TUE 31 PORT VALE PAPA JOHN’S TROPHY H 19:00 February September SAT 5 MORECAMBE OR EMIRATES FA CUP 4 A 15:00 TUE 8 CHARLTON ATHLETIC H 20:00 SAT 4 BURTON ALBION** H 15:00 SAT 12 OXFORD UNITED A 15:00 SAT 11 IPSWICH TOWN A 15:00 SAT 19 A.F.C. WIMBLEDON H 15:00 SAT 18 ROTHERHAM UNITED H 15:00 TUE 22 LINCOLN CITY H 20:00 WED 22 CARABAO CUP THREE SAT 26 MILTON KEYNES DONS A 15:00 SAT 25 SUNDERLAND A 15:00 SUN 27 CARABAO CUP FINAL TUE 28 CHARLTON ATHLETIC A 19:45 March October WED 2 EMIRATES FA CUP 5 SAT 2 SHREWSBURY TOWN H 15:00 SAT 5 GILLINGHAM A 15:00 TUE 5 LIVERPOOL U21’S PAPA JOHN’S TROPHY H 19:00 SAT 12 PLYMOUTH ARGYLE H 15:00 SAT 9 SHEFFIELD WEDNESDAY** A 15:00 CREWE ALEXANDRA SAT 19 OR EMIRATES FA CUP QUARTER-FINAL A 15:00 SAT 16 WIGAN ATHLETIC H 15:00 SAT 26 PORTSMOUTH** H 15:00 TUE 19 PLYMOUTH ARGYLE A 19:45 April SAT 23 GILLINGHAM H 15:00 SAT 2 WIGAN ATHLETIC A 15:00 WED 27 CARABAO CUP FOUR
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Regional Development Programme 1986-90
    EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England — South Yorkshire Section 7F: England — Workington Section 7G: England — Greater Manchester Section 7H: England — Greater Merseyside lUlaUmiãl· I U If ΦΟ DOCUMENT DOCUMENTI CUMENT DOCUMENTO DOK1 ¡NT ΕΓΓΡΑΦΟ DOCUMENT DI JMENTO DOCUMENT UUCUM TU ηυκυΜΕΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦΟηΐ (MENT DOCUMENTO OUCUMI MHB ΡΑΦΟΟΟΟΟΜΕΜ I tvivl COMMISSION POOGIIIÌEN^DOG OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦ( uranFrinii nni-iiupuiiiAnAni This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1987 Vol.3 : ISBN 92-825-7194-7 Vol. 1-7: ISBN 92-825-7199-8 Catalogue number: CB-98-87-00J-EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium Commission of the European Communities European Regional Development Fund UK RE6I0NAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: EngLand - South Yorkshire Section 7F: EngLand - Workington Section 7G: EngLand - Greater Manchester Section 7H: EngLand - Greater Merseyside Document This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Copyright ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels - Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. / L European Regional Development Fund UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England - South Yorkshire d UCJ [ \j \ 1' UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 CONTENTS The Programme consists of detailed information on regional or sub-regional areas (Sections 7 to 10) preceded by general information on the United Kingdom (Sections 1 to 6).
    [Show full text]