DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Environmental Assessment of United Utilities’ Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United Utilities Strategic Environmental Assessment of United Utilities’ Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017 Environmental Report January 2017 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Client: United Utilities Title: Strategic Environmental Assessment of United Utilities’ Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017: Environmental Report Project No: CC1355 Date of Issue: 09 January 2017 Version No: 1.3 Produced By Authorised for Release By ……………………………….. …………………………………… Dr Anne Fairhead Liz Baker Senior Environmental Scientist Managing Consultant CONTACT DETAILS CASCADE CONSULTING Enterprise House Manchester Science Park Lloyd St North Manchester M15 6SE Tel: 0161 227 9777 Fax: 0161 227 1777 United Utilities SEA of United Utilities’ Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017 Environmental Report Final THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Cascade Consulting United Utilities SEA of United Utilities’ Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017 Environmental Report Final Contents Non-Technical Summary 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Purpose of Report .................................................................................. 1 1.2 Application of SEA to Drought Planning ......................................................................... 2 1.3 UU’s Water Supply System, Water Resource Management and Drought Planning ....... 6 1.4 UU’s Drought Planning Process and Drought Options .................................................. 10 1.5 Drought Permit/Order Environmental Studies ............................................................. 16 1.6 Stages of SEA Process ..................................................................................................... 17 1.7 Structure of the Environmental Report .......................................................................... 19 1.8 Consultation Process ..................................................................................................... 20 2 Baseline and Context ................................................................................ 22 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Review of Policies, Plans and Programmes ................................................................... 22 2.3 Review of Baseline ......................................................................................................... 33 2.4 Summary of Key Issues .................................................................................................. 58 3 Methodology ............................................................................................ 61 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 61 3.2 Assessment Methodology and SEA Framework ............................................................. 61 3.3 Primary Assessment .......................................................................................................65 3.4 Secondary, Cumulative and Synergistic Environmental Effects Assessment ................ 77 3.5 Limitations of the Study ................................................................................................. 79 4 Assessment of Drought Options .............................................................. 80 4.1 Drought Options Assessed ............................................................................................. 80 4.2 Assessment of Schemes Against SEA Objectives ........................................................... 80 4.3 Supply Side Options ....................................................................................................... 80 4.4 Demand Side Options .................................................................................................... 84 4.5 Drought Permit/Order Options ..................................................................................... 86 4.6 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 91 5 Cumulative Effects Assessment ................................................................ 92 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 92 5.2 Cumulative Effects With UU’s Existing Abstraction Licences ...................................... 92 5.3 Cumulative Effects Between Drought Options (Intra-Zone) ......................................... 98 5.4 Inter-Zone Cumulative Effects Between Drought Options .......................................... 103 5.5 Demand Management .................................................................................................. 104 5.6 River Eden Schemes ..................................................................................................... 104 5.7 UU’s WRMP Schemes ................................................................................................... 105 5.8 Environment Agency Drought Plans ............................................................................ 106 5.9 Other Water Company Drought Plans ..........................................................................108 5.10 National Policy Statements ........................................................................................... 110 6 Mitigation and Monitoring ...................................................................... 111 6.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................ 111 6.2 Mitigation....................................................................................................................... 111 6.3 Monitoring .................................................................................................................... 112 7 Summary ................................................................................................. 113 Cascade Consulting United Utilities SEA of United Utilities’ Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017 Environmental Report Final List of Figures Figure 1.1 SEA Screening route of UU’s Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017 through Figure 2 flow diagram from ODPM (2005) Guidelines Figure 1.2 United Utilities regional supply system Figure 2.1 Designated conservation sites in North West England and North Wales Figure 2.2 Designated conservation sites in Wales Figure 2.3 Agricultural land classifications Figure 2.4 Landscape character designations Figure 3.1 Legend for colour coding of residual impact significance Figure 5.1 Legend for colour coding the cumulative assessments of UU’s drought options with UU’s existing abstraction licences Figure 5.2 Cumulative impacts matrix: Integrated Resource Zone Figure 5.3 Cumulative impacts matrix: West Cumbria Resource Zone Figure 5.4 Cumulative impacts matrix: North Eden Resource Zone Figure 5.5 Cumulative impacts matrix: demand management measures List of Tables Table 1.1 Supply side drought options included in the SEA and HRA Table 1.2 Demand side options (all water resource zones) Table 1.3 Drought permit/order options (all water resource zones) Table 1.4 Drought permit/order sites Environmental Assessments Table 1.5 SEA stages and tasks Table 2.1 Policy, plans and programmes reviewed Table 2.2 Key policy messages Table 2.3 Level of qualifications Table 2.4 Water use Table 2.5 North West England energy demand by sector (2009) Table 2.6 Dwellings in the North West of England by tenure (2007) Table 2.7 Overall ecological status of surface waterbodies (2015) Table 2.8 2014 Mandatory compliance results for bathing waters in the UK Table 2.9 Agricultural land classification Table 2.10 Key sustainability issues arising from the baseline assessment Table 3.1 SEA objectives Table 3.2 Example of a SEA appraisal framework table completed for each drought option Table 3.3 Assessment scale used to advise evaluation of each drought option against the objectives Table 3.4 Example of a visual evaluation matrix Table 4.1 Visual evaluation matrix summary for supply side options Table 4.2 Visual evaluation matrix summary for demand side options Table 4.3 Visual evaluation matrix summary for drought permit/order options Table 5.1 Summary of potential cumulative effects of supply side and drought permit/order options and existing UU abstraction licences Table 7.1 Visual evaluation matrix summary of SEA of UU’s drought options List of Appendices Appendix A Summary of Construction Activities Required for Supply-Side Drought Options Appendix B Environment Agency Drought Option Forms Appendix C Statutory Consultee Responses to the 2016 SEA Scoping Report Appendix D Review of Plans and Programmes Appendix E SEA Appraisal Tables Appendix F Figures Cascade Consulting United Utilities SEA of United Utilities’ Revised Draft Drought Plan 2017 Environmental Report Final NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Introduction Under the Water Act 2014, United Utilities (UU) is required to prepare and update a Drought Plan every five years. UU published their current statutory Drought Plan on the 17th July 2014. On 26 January 2016, UU published an updated environmental assessment report for the Crummock Water drought permit option in West Cumbria, which resulted in a reduction to the volume of water available for abstraction from this reservoir. UU believe that this change, in- combination with the development of a new source of water, the South Egremont boreholes
Recommended publications
  • The Urban Image of North-West English Industrial Towns

    The Urban Image of North-West English Industrial Towns

    ‘Views Grim But Splendid’ - Te Urban Image of North-West English Industrial Towns A Roberts PhD 2016 ‘Views Grim But Splendid’ - Te Urban Image of North-West English Industrial Towns Amber Roberts o 2016 Contents 2 Acknowledgements 4 Abstract 5 21 01 Literature Review 53 02 Research Methods 81 Region’ 119 155 181 215 245 275 298 1 Acknowledgements 2 3 Abstract ‘What is the urban image of the north- western post-industrial town?’ 4 00 Introduction This research focuses on the urban image of North West English historic cultural images, the built environment and the growing the towns in art, urban planning and the built environment throughout case of Stockport. Tesis Introduction 5 urban development that has become a central concern in the towns. 6 the plans also engage with the past through their strategies towards interest in urban image has led to a visual approach that interrogates This allows a more nuanced understanding of the wider disseminated image of the towns. This focuses on the represented image of the and the wider rural areas of the Lancashire Plain and the Pennines. Tesis Introduction 7 restructuring the town in successive phases and reimagining its future 8 development of urban image now that the towns have lost their Tesis Introduction 9 Figure 0.1, showing the M60 passing the start of the River Mersey at Stockport, image author’s own, May 2013. 10 of towns in the North West. These towns have been in a state of utopianism. persistent cultural images of the North which the towns seek to is also something which is missing from the growing literature on Tesis Introduction 11 to compare the homogenous cultural image to the built environment models to follow.
  • River Croal – Draft Supplementary Planning Document (SPD)

    River Croal – Draft Supplementary Planning Document (SPD)

    River Croal – Draft Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Contents 1 Introduction 2 Purpose of the SPD 3 Policy Context 4 The River Croal 5 The Vision 6 Development Constraints 7 Design Objectives 8 Implementation and Delivery 9 Conclusion 10 Monitoring and Review 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Bolton’s Core Strategy is the Local Plan for the Borough and Section 3 sets out in more detail policies affecting the River Croal as it runs through Bolton Town Centre. In line with MHCLG Planning Practice Guidance this draft SPD builds upon and provides more detailed advice or guidance on the policies in the Local Plan. 1.2 Within the context of The Bolton Economy: Our Strategy for Growth 2016-2030 (“Economic Strategy”), the Council has adopted a Town Centre Strategy (“Town Centre Strategy”) including a masterplan framework and key intervention areas. These documents set out Bolton’s ambition and vision to achieve a £1bn regeneration of the town centre and sustain its immediate future to the benefit of the wider Borough and its residents, supported by £100m direct investment from the Council. 1.3 The Council is seeking to open up and improve access to and along the River Croal thereby maximising this untapped asset as it runs through Bolton town centre. This draft Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) has been prepared to convey the council’s aspirations for the river and assist with guiding development where development proposals impact on the river. The area covered by this draft SPD is shown in Appendix 1. The River Croal runs from Queens Park in the west, through the Croal Valley intervention area to the town centre, under the Market Place, through the Church Wharf intervention area to and ends where it is culverted under the A666 St.
  • 7. Industrial and Modern Resource

    7. Industrial and Modern Resource

    Chapter 7: Industrial Period Resource Assessment Chapter 7 The Industrial and Modern Period Resource Assessment by Robina McNeil and Richard Newman With contributions by Mark Brennand, Eleanor Casella, Bernard Champness, CBA North West Industrial Archaeology Panel, David Cranstone, Peter Davey, Chris Dunn, Andrew Fielding, David George, Elizabeth Huckerby, Christine Longworth, Ian Miller, Mike Morris, Michael Nevell, Caron Newman, North West Medieval Pottery Research Group, Sue Stallibrass, Ruth Hurst Vose, Kevin Wilde, Ian Whyte and Sarah Woodcock. Introduction Implicit in any archaeological study of this period is the need to balance the archaeological investigation The cultural developments of the 16th and 17th centu- of material culture with many other disciplines that ries laid the foundations for the radical changes to bear on our understanding of the recent past. The society and the environment that commenced in the wealth of archive and documentary sources available 18th century. The world’s first Industrial Revolution for constructing historical narratives in the Post- produced unprecedented social and environmental Medieval period offer rich opportunities for cross- change and North West England was at the epicentre disciplinary working. At the same time historical ar- of the resultant transformation. Foremost amongst chaeology is increasingly in the foreground of new these changes was a radical development of the com- theoretical approaches (Nevell 2006) that bring to- munications infrastructure, including wholly new gether economic and sociological analysis, anthropol- forms of transportation (Fig 7.1), the growth of exist- ogy and geography. ing manufacturing and trading towns and the crea- tion of new ones. The period saw the emergence of Environment Liverpool as an international port and trading me- tropolis, while Manchester grew as a powerhouse for The 18th to 20th centuries witnessed widespread innovation in production, manufacture and transpor- changes within the landscape of the North West, and tation.
  • The Rise of Bolton As an Important Engineering and Textile Town in Early 1800 England

    The Rise of Bolton As an Important Engineering and Textile Town in Early 1800 England

    I. međunarodna konferencija u povodu 150. obljetnice tvornice torpeda u Rijeci i očuvanja riječke industrijske baštine 57 THE RISE OF BOLTON AS AN IMPORTANT ENGINEERING AND TEXTILE TOWN IN EARLY 1800 ENGLAND Denis O’Connor, Industrial Historian Bolton Lancashire, Great Britain INTRODUCTION The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that Great Britain changed, in the 19th Century, from a rural economy to one based on coal and iron. In doing so it created conditions for British civil, textile and mechanical engineers, such as Robert Whitehead of Bolton, to rise to positions of eminence in their particular fields. Such men travelled across Europe, and laid, through the steam engine and railways, the foundations for many of the regions present day industries. EARLY TEXTILES AND BLEACHING. RISE OF LOCAI INDUSTRIES The origins of Bolton’s textile and engineering industry lie back in the 12th Century with the appointment of a Crown Quality Controller called an Ulnager. During the reign of Henry V111 an itinerant historian Leland observed that ‘Bolton - upon - Moore Market standeth by the cotton and coarse yarns - Diverse villages above Bolton do make Cotton’ and that ‘They burne at Bolton some canelle (coal) of which the Pitts be not far off’. Coal, combined with the many powerful streams of water from the moorlands, provided the basic elements for the textile industry to grow, the damp atmosphere conducive to good spinning of thread. In 1772 a Directory of Manchester (10-12 miles distant) was published, in this can be seen the extent of cloth making in an area of about 12 miles radius round Manchester, with 77 fustian makers (Flax warp and cotton or wool weft) attending the markets, 23 of whom were resident in Bolton.
  • Eagley Junior School Inspection Report

    Eagley Junior School Inspection Report

    Eagley Junior School Inspection report Unique Reference Number 105188 Local Authority Bolton Inspection number 324177 Inspection dates 4–5 December 2008 Reporting inspector Liam Trippier HMI This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 7–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number on roll School (total) 227 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mr Anthony Terrible Headteacher Mrs K Wilkinson Date of previous school inspection 13 September 2005 School address Chapeltown Road Bromley Cross Bolton Lancashire BL7 9AT Telephone number 01204 333708 Fax number 01204 333709 Age group 7–11 Inspection dates 4–5 December 2008 Inspection number 324177 Inspection Report: Eagley Junior School, 4–5 December 2008 2 of 11 . © Crown copyright 2008 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. Inspection Report: Eagley Junior School, 4–5 December 2008 3 of 11 Introduction The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and one Additional Inspector. Description of the school Eagley Junior is an average sized school located to the north of Bolton.
  • North West River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 to 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the North West River Basin District

    North West River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 to 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the North West River Basin District

    North West river basin district Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 to 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the North West river basin district March 2016 1 of 139 Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2016 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 139 Contents Glossary and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 The layout of this document ........................................................................................................ 8 1 Sub-areas in the North West River Basin District ......................................................... 10 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 10 Management Catchments ...................................................................................................... 11 Flood Risk Areas ................................................................................................................... 11 2 Conclusions and measures to manage risk for the Flood Risk Areas in the North West River Basin District ...............................................................................................
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester

    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester

    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester Sub-Regional Assessment Appendix B – Supporting Information “Living Document” June 2008 Association of Greater Manchester Authorities SFRA – Sub-Regional Assessment Revision Schedule Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester June 2008 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 August 2007 DRAFT Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 02 December DRAFT FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales 2007 Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 03 June 2008 FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Anita Longworth Alan Houghton Principal Planner Head of Planning North West Scott Wilson St James's Buildings, Oxford Street, Manchester, This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's M1 6EF, appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson United Kingdom accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, Tel: +44 (0)161 236 8655 or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole.
  • Croal/Irwell Local Environment Agency Plan Environmental Overview October 1998

    Croal/Irwell Local Environment Agency Plan Environmental Overview October 1998

    Croal/Irwell Local Environment Agency Plan Environmental Overview October 1998 NW - 10/98-250-C-BDBS E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Croal/lrwell 32 Local Environment Agency Plan Map 1 30 30 E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Contents Croal/lrwell Local Environment Agency Plan (LEAP) Environmental Overview Contents 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Air Quality 2 1.3 Water Quality 7 1.4 Effluent Disposal 12 1.5 Hydrology. 15 1.6 Hydrogeology 17 1.7 Water Abstraction - Surface and Groundwater 18 1.8 Area Drainage 20 1.9 Waste Management 29 1.10 Fisheries 36 1.11 . Ecology 38 1.12 Recreation and Amenity 45 1.13 Landscape and Heritage 48 1.14 Development . 5 0 1.15 Radioactive Substances 56 / 1.16 Agriculture 57 Appendix 1 - Glossary 60 Appendix 2 - Abbreviations ' 66 Appendix 3 - River Quality Objectives (RQOs) 68 Appendix 4 - Environment Agency Leaflets and Reports 71 Croal/lrwell LEAP l Environmental Overview Maps Number Title Adjacent to Page: 1 The Area Cover 2 Integrated Pollution Control (IPC) 3 3 Water Quality: General Quality Assessment Chemical Grading 1996 7 4 Water Quality: General Quality Assessment: Biological Grading 1995 8 5 Water Quality: Compliance with proposed Short Term River Ecosystem RQOs 9 6 Water Quality: Compliance with proposed Long Term River Ecosystem RQOs 10 7 EC Directive Compliance 11 8 Effluent Disposal 12 9 Rainfall 15 10 Hydrometric Network 16 11 Summary Geological Map: Geology at Surface (simplified) 17 12 Licensed Abstractions>0.5 Megalitre per day 18 13 Flood Defence: River Network 21 14 Flood Defence: River Corridor
  • Thanks to Funding Secured from the Green Recovery Challenge Fund, Nature Is on the Road to Recovery in Greater Manchester

    Thanks to Funding Secured from the Green Recovery Challenge Fund, Nature Is on the Road to Recovery in Greater Manchester

    Thanks to funding secured from the Green Recovery Challenge Fund, nature is on the road to recovery in Greater Manchester. The bid, fronted by the newly established Greater Manchester Environment Fund (GMEF), put forward a programme of priority projects that will establish a network for nature across the county. And it is great news for people working in the environment and those looking for green careers; 37 jobs will be created and safeguarded including new 12 traineeships. The Greater Manchester Environment Fund (GMEF) is being established to deliver Greater Manchester’s ambition for a “clean, carbon-neutral, climate resilient city region with a thriving natural environment”, by aligning public and philanthropic funding, attracting private investment, prioritising limited resources and facilitating collaborative bids. Managed by the Wildlife Trust for Lancashire, Manchester and North Merseyside, the fund will be launched in spring, but with the success of a collaborative bid to the Green Recovery Challenge Fund, some projects will start now to demonstrate a desire to provide networks for nature to flourish. The bid is a collaboration between Environmental Non-Government Organisations who work across Greater Manchester and have been hardest hit by the pandemic. Mersey Rivers Trust, Canal and Rivers Trust, Northern Roots, RSPB, City of Trees, The Conservation Volunteers, Finance Earth, the Wildlife Trusts and the Great Manchester Wetlands Partnership have come together to support Greater Manchester Combined Authority’s Build Back Greener
  • Review of Discharge Consents Irwell Catchment

    Review of Discharge Consents Irwell Catchment

    Review of discharge consents. River Irwell catchment report Item Type monograph Publisher North West Water Authority Download date 25/09/2021 14:27:27 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/27235 RSD2/A20 REVIEW OF DISCHARGE CONSENTS IRWELL CATCHMENT REPORT Contents 1. Introduction 2. Physical Description of Catchment 3. River Water - Chemical Classification 4 . Discharges and Consents 4.1 Authority Sewage Treatment Works 4.2 Authority Trade Effluent Discharges 4.3 Private Trade Effluent Discharges 4.4 Private Sewage Treatment Works 4 .5 Storm Sewage Overflows 5. Special Cases MARCH 1979 Introduction The purpose of this Report is to make recommendations for the revision of consents for discharges within the catchment of the River Irwell, downstream to and including the River Medlock in Manchester. This revision has the sole objective of recognising the present effluent and river water quality - proposals for long term river water quality objectives are to be put forward in other Reports. The report identifies the existing situation regarding the legal status of effluent discharges from Authority and non-Authority owned installations within the catchment, details the determinand concentration limits included in existing discharge consents (where appropriate) and proposes the limits to be included in the reviewed consents. The reviewed consents will reflect the quality of efflu­ ent achievable by good operation of the existing plant based on 1977 effluent quality data but taking into account any improvements, extensions etc. that have been or are about to be carried out and any known further industrial and/or housing development in the works drainage area. The proposed limits are intended to be the 95% compliance figures rather than the 80% compliance figures inferred in existing consents and hence the new figures will obviously be higher than the old.
  • JBA Consulting Report Template 2015

    JBA Consulting Report Template 2015

    Greater Manchester Strategic Flood Risk Management Framework Final Report September 2018 Manchester City Council Town Hall Albert Square Manchester M60 2LA JBA Project Manager Mike Williamson JBA Consulting Mersey Bank House Barbauld Street Warrington WA1 1WA Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to V1.0 Final / 14 September 2018 GMCA, EA comments addressed David Hodcroft V1.1 Final/ 16 January 2019 GMCA Amendments David Hodcroft Contract This report describes work commissioned by David Hodcroft, on behalf of Greater Manchester Combined Authority Planning and Housing Team, by a letter dated 14 June 2017. The lead representative for the contract was David Hodcroft. Rachel Brisley, Mike Williamson and Charlotte Lloyd-Randall of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Rachel Brisley BA Dip TRP MCD MBA AMBA B ....................................................................... Associate Director Reviewed by ................................................. Mike Williamson BSc MSc EADA FRGS CGeog ....................................................................... Senior Chartered Analyst ....................................................................... Philip Bennett-Lloyd BSc Dip Mgmt CMLI MCIEEM MCIWEM CWEM CEnv Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for Greater Manchester Combined Authority. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the client for the purposes
  • Recruitment Pack 2020 an Introduction

    Recruitment Pack 2020 an Introduction

    Recruitment Pack 2020 An Introduction About Us Our Vision Our wildlife has declined by 60% in the past 50 years To create a region rich in wildlife for all to enjoy, and people are becoming more disengaged with their keeping nature at the heart of everything we do. local wild places. We are a membership organisation, and we could not continue our work without our Our Mission members support. To support nature’s recovery by reconnecting and restoring wildlife and habitats on land and at sea, inspiring people to value and take action for wildlife. Our Aim To lead the way for nature’s recovery and connect people with nature on their doorstep. We want to The Wildlife Trust for Lancashire, Manchester and create an environment where wildlife can thrive North Merseyside was founded in 1962 by people who knew they needed to take action. without threat and ensure people value the importance of nature to their health and wellbeing. We are now the largest nature conservation body in the area working at a grass roots, local level whilst also being part of a strong cohesive national movement. We work to protect wild spaces, and re-introduce key Our core objectives species, protecting the biodiversity of our area so that nature can recover. To protect, create and enhance wildlife in our region, creating living landscapes and We work in partnership with other organisations, living seas community groups, landowners and key decision-makers To stand up for wildlife and the to inspire them to work with and for nature. environment To inspire people about the natural world We have the powerful voices of over 28,000 and encourage everyone to take action for members, whose invaluable support we simply could wildlife not do without.