DOCSLIB.ORG

Ass. Prof. Stoyan Germanov, Phd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ass. Prof. Stoyan Germanov, Phd MACEDONIAN SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE – SOFIA Ass. Prof. Stoyan Germanov, PhD THE MACEDONIAN QUESTION HISTORY AND ACTUALITY Sofia, 2010 Assoc. Prof. Stoyan Germanov, Dr. is a descendent of Ohrid refugees. He finished high school in the town of Petrich and graduated from “St. Kliment Ohridski” Sofia University with a history degree. His scientific interest is aimed at the Bulgarian national liberation movement after the Berlin Congress, the policy of the Great Powers about the Macedonian Question, etc. He has specialized in London, Mos- cow and St. Peterburg. He has written more than 60 studios, articles and 2 mono- graphs. Also, he has participated in national and international scientific events – XXI symposium of military history, Quebec (1995); XVII World’s Congress of Historians, Montreal (1995); the Congress of the Organization of Security and Co- operation in Europe, Warsaw (1998); VI World’s Congress for search of Central and South Europe, Tampere, Finland (2000), Scientific symposium for the ethnical changes in Macedonia, Skopie (1994), etc. Since 1991 he has been a research associ- ate and scientific secretary of the restored Macedonian Scientific Institute – Sofia. THE MACEDONIAN QUESTION. HISTORY AND ACTUALITY © Stoyan Germanov, autor © Kosta Zhekov, cover design Reviewer: Prof. Trendafil Mitev, DSc Translated into english by: Galina Kopcheva Editor: Vania Stoianova, PhD Computerprint design: Emil Iliev, PhD Printing Press of Prof. Marin Drinov Academic Publishing House ISBN 978–954–8187–77–0 – 3 – CONTENTS Essence of the Macedonian Question and first ideas for its solution ................................................................. 4 From the Balkan Wars to the Versailles System ............................................. 6 The Comintern and the Macedonian Question .............................................. 10 The Macedonian Question during the War Period ........................................ 15 New Ideas, new mistakes and compromises .................................................. 17 First Attempts for Reconsideration ............................................................... 31 The Beginning of a New Course .................................................................... 34 The Macedonian Question in Bilateral Bulgarian-Yugoslavian Meetings and Conversations ............................................................................... 37 The Macedonian Question at the End of the XX and the Beginning of the XXI Century .............................................................................. 40 Bibliography ................................................................................................. 49 – 4 – For over a century the Macedonian Question has been of interest to scien- tists, politicians and statesmen crossing the frontiers of the Balkans and becoming an issue for the policy and diplomacy of a series of countries. It has been the object of political and scientific disputes, diplomatic schemes, utopian projects, political designs and territorial claims. Nowadays some aspects of the Macedonian Question have reached scientific or political decisions, others are still controversial due to the exceptive politicization and the stereotypical thinking from the near past. Over the last two decades the historical science has made it possible for new analyses and prognoses to take place. New documents began to be used in science, a new generation of research-workers appeared in Bulgaria and abroad, who made a great contribution to the Macedonian Question by throwing light upon it from a contemporary point of view. In the present survey an attempt is made to follow up the objective prereq- uisites for the rise of the Macedonian Question and its development till the Balkan Wars, also, the period between the two wars has been taken into account. Special attention is paid to the events during and after the Second World War. The nation- al-territorial, state-political and people’s strivings are analyzed in every stage; the standpoints for new nations are outlined under the influence of the Communist movement and its doctrines; the ideas for a Balkan and South-Slavic federation as a possible solution for the Macedonian Question are presented as well as the under- standings for the Macedonian Question after the changes from the 1990s and the beginning of the XXI century. ESSENCE OF THE MACEDONIAN QUESTION AND FIRST IDEAS FOR ITS SOLUTION The Macedonian Question originated as a part of the insoluble Bulgarian national question. The European scientific and political thought as early as before the Liberation recognized the ethnical boundaries of the Bulgarian people. This fact was also confirmed at the Constantinople Conference of the Great Powers (1876), as well as by the self-determining of the Bulgarian population during political and spiritual fights. But the Congress of Berlin (1878) hindered the wishes and aspira- – 5 – tions of the Bulgarian nation for national unification by opening a wound which has been bleeding till nowadays. In that way, the unsuccessful attempt for uniting the Bulgarian nation in 1878, the interference of the Great Powers and the territori- al aspirations of the neighboring Balkan countries were the main reasons for the rise of the Macedonian Question. Bulgaria was compelled for decades on to take care of issues that our neighbors had solved much quickly at minimum losses, in- stead of concentrating on the state’s cultural and economical life. One of the most important aspects of the Macedonian Question, among all, concerns the ethnical character of the Slavic population in Macedonia which was a majority. Even before the era of the disputes, the studies of such scrupulous, unbi- ased scientists and travelers as V. Grigorovich, Ami Boué, Leon Lamouche, Georges Desbons, Gustav Weigand, Lubor Niederle, Pavel Milukov, Nikodim Kondakov, Nikolai Derjavin, Henry Brailsford and many others had proven con- vincingly that the Slavic population in Macedonia was Bulgarian according to his- tory, manner of life and culture and the Bulgarians were dominant element. This was not to the benefit of the Belgrade and Athens ruling circles. During the dis- putes, seemingly harmless at first, a wish for the realization of the long term strate- gies of Serbia and Greece became apparent. Help was needed and the scientific thought of both countries was summoned. A competition began - whose interests were bigger, who had historical rights, etc. The Russian diplomacy in the person of the consuls in Bitola, Skopie and Thessaloniki joined in help of the Serbian thesis despite having another opinion beforehand. However, when realizing that the policy for direct Serbianisation of the Bulgarian population in Macedonia had no perspective from a political and scien- tific point of view, a part of the Serbian intelligentsia oriented to Macedonianism. In its origin Macedonianism was the offspring of the Great-Serbian propaganda and aspirations. It aimed at disuniting the Bulgarians and denationalizing a part of the people. Its goal was to destroy the Macedonian Bulgarians’ feelings of belong- ing the to the Bulgarian nation, to make them forget their Bulgarian spirit and root. But till the Balkan Wars the Macedonianism had very little influence and support in Macedonia itself. Few Bulgarians were like Kr. Misirkov who yielded to Serbian suggestions and sacrificed their Bulgarian national feeling. Being dependent on the particular situation and position of the Powers, the solution of the Macedonian Question during the first stage, namely till the wars, – 6 – was searched in several directions. Direct joining to Bulgaria was one of the first suggestions for solving the Macedonian Question. But it was postponed due to the hardship which might have been created by the Great Powers and the neighboring Balkan countries. The other option for the solving of the Macedonian Question was autonomy. That view was appropriated by the Revolutionary movement in Mace- donia after it had become clear that the unification with Bulgaria would be more difficult due to the territorial aspirations of Serbia and Greece and later of other countries. Autonomy with priority of the Bulgarian element, for being the most nu- merous one, was accepted not only by the Revolutionary organization, but also by the Bulgarian government. However, under no circumstances Serbia and Greece would support the autonomy. Their inmost wish was to divide Macedonia and till that moment to define spheres of influence. In that way, during this stage two tendencies were outlined - one under the leadership of the Internal Macedonian and Adrianople Revolutionary Organization (IMARO) for preparation of a mass armed uprising and the other – the pursuit of Serbia, Greece, Romania with the coopera- tion of the Turkish authorities to establish specific spheres of influence. This mutu- al fight going on through the whole period and especially during the Reform action (1903-1908) reflected worst the Bulgarian element and considerably reduced it, far before the tragic events in 1913 when actually the Serbians, Greeks and Turks uni- fied against the Bulgarians. FROM THE BALKAN WARS TO THE VERSAILLES SYSTEM After the Balkan Wars, especially after the First World War, the Macedo- nian Question entered a new stage of development. It had turned out that neither the Balkan countries, nor the Great Powers had the intention of finding a solution, in the least a fair one, according to the proclaimed principles of self-determination of the nations by the American
Load more

Recommended publications
  • English and INTRODACTION
    CHANGES AND CONTINUITY IN EVERYDAY LIFE IN ALBANIA, BULGARIA AND MACEDONIA 1945-2000 UNDERSTANDING A SHARED PAST LEARNING FOR THE FUTURE 1 This Teacher Resource Book has been published in the framework of the Stability Pact for South East Europe CONTENTS with financial support from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It is available in Albanian, Bulgarian, English and INTRODACTION..............................................3 Macedonian language. POLITICAL LIFE...........................................17 CONSTITUTION.....................................................20 Title: Changes and Continuity in everyday life in Albania, ELECTIONS...........................................................39 Bulgaria and Macedonia POLITICAL PERSONS..............................................50 HUMAN RIGHTS....................................................65 Author’s team: Terms.................................................................91 ALBANIA: Chronology........................................................92 Adrian Papajani, Fatmiroshe Xhemali (coordinators), Agron Nishku, Bedri Kola, Liljana Guga, Marie Brozi. Biographies........................................................96 BULGARIA: Bibliography.......................................................98 Rumyana Kusheva, Milena Platnikova (coordinators), Teaching approches..........................................101 Bistra Stoimenova, Tatyana Tzvetkova,Violeta Stoycheva. ECONOMIC LIFE........................................103 MACEDONIA: CHANGES IN PROPERTY.......................................104
    [Show full text]
  • Small State Autonomy in Hierarchical Regimes. the Case of Bulgaria in the German and Soviet Spheres of Influence 1933 – 1956
    Small State Autonomy in Hierarchical Regimes. The Case of Bulgaria in the German and Soviet Spheres of Influence 1933 – 1956 By Vera Asenova Submitted to Central European University Doctoral School of Political Science, Public Policy and International Relations In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Prof. Julius Horváth Budapest, Hungary November 2013 Statement I hereby state that the thesis contains no materials accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions. The thesis contains no materials previously written and/or published by another person, except where appropriate acknowledgement is made in the form of bibliographical reference. Vera Asenova ………………... ii Abstract This thesis studies international cooperation between a small and a big state in the framework of administered international trade regimes. It discusses the short-term economic goals and long-term institutional effects of international rules on domestic politics of small states. A central concept is the concept of authority in hierarchical relations as defined by Lake, 2009. Authority is granted by the small state in the course of interaction with the hegemonic state, but authority is also utilized by the latter in order to attract small partners and to create positive expectations from cooperation. The main research question is how do small states trade their own authority for economic gains in relations with foreign governments and with local actors. This question is about the relationship between international and domestic hierarchies and the structural continuities that result from international cooperation. The contested relationship between foreign authority and domestic institutions is examined through the experience of Bulgaria under two different international trade regimes – the German economic sphere in the 1930’s and the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA) in the early 1950’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Kata Bohus History 2013
    JEWS, ISRAELITES, ZIONISTS THE HUNGARIAN STATE’S POLICIES ON JEWISH ISSUES IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE (1956-1968) Kata Bohus A DISSERTATION in History Presented to the Faculties of the Central European University in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2013. Dissertation Supervisor: Dr. András Kovács Copyright in the text of this dissertation rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European University Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. I hereby declare that this dissertation contains no materials accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions and no materials previously written and/or published by another person unless otherwise noted. CEU eTD Collection 5 Abstract The dissertation investigates early Kádárism in Hungary, from the point of view of policies regarding Jewish issues, using a comparative framework of other Eastern European socialist countries. It follows state policies between 1956 and 1968, two dates that mark large Jewish emigration waves from communist Eastern Europe in the wake of national crises in Hungary (1956), Poland (1956, 1968) and Czechoslovakia (1968). The complex topic of policies relating to the Hungarian Jewish community, individuals of Jewish origin and the state of Israel facilitates the multidimensional examination of the post-Stalinist Party state at work.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges to Democratic Representation in the Public Space of Societies in Transition: Case Study of the City of Skopje
    The struggle to belong Dealing with diversity in 21st century urban setting. Amsterdam, 7-9 July 2011 Challenges to Democratic Representation in the Public Space of Societies in Transition: case study of the city of Skopje Katerina Mojanchevska Programme Coordinator at Performing Arts Center Multimedia, DTC Mavrovka, Lamela C 1/1, Skopje, Macedonia, e-mail: [email protected] Paper presented at the International RC21 Conference 2011 Session: 5.2 PUBLIC SPACE: GOVERNING DIVERSITY. Abstract Today the reality in most European cities is that they have grown to become places where diverse realities mix, social interaction happen and cultural expressions materialize, generating conflicts related to multiculturalism. Management of cultural diversity at city level positions two dilemmas. The first related to the tension among the cultural expression of the state culture and the recognition of groups with political demands and cultural expression different from those of the majority and the second, the subversion of the equality principle when rights based on group identities are claimed (Tatjer, 2004: 248). How can the cities accommodate cultural difference? What kind of practices of the public domain and shared public space should be developed so that the participation and representation of different ethno-cultural groups and their cultural right are taking part in defining and redefining city`s boundaries, use and management? The paper looks at these questions from the point of view of the city of Skopje, the capital of Macedonia and its urban practices which profoundly cut and pasted fragments of its history, image and identity. 1 Introduction Access to publicly shared space and achievement of cultural diversity in shared public spaces pose a great challenge for multicultural post-socialist societies with experience of violent inter- ethnic conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Меѓународен Годишник International Yearbook
    МЕЃУНАРОДЕН INTERNATIONAL ГОДИШНИК YEARBOOK НА ФАКУЛТЕТОТ ЗА БЕЗБЕДНОСТ FACULTY OF SECURITY 2020/1 2020/1 Publisher: Faculty of security – Skopje D-r Sc. Andrej Sotlar, Dean of the Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, For the Publisher: University of Maribor, Slovenia; D-r Sc. Nikola Dujovski, Dean D-r Sc. Vladimir Cvetkovic, Dean of the Faculty of Security, Beograd, Serbia; International editorial board: D-r Sc. Dane Subosic, University of D-r Sc. Nikola Dujovski, Dean of the Criminal Investigation and Police studies, Faculty of Security - Skopje, UKLO, Beograd, Serbia; North Macedonia; D-r Sc. Krunoslav Borovec, Dean of the D-r Sc. Vesna Stefanovska, Faculty of Higher Police School, Croatia; Security - Skopje, UKLO, North D-r Sc. Irma Deljkic, Faculty of Macedonia; Criminalistics, Criminology and Security D-r Sc. Natasha Peovska, Faculty of Studies, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia Security - Skopje, UKLO, North and Herzegovina Macedonia; D-r Sc. Vesna Nikolic Ristanovic, D-r Sc. Cvetko Andreevski, Dean of Faculty of Special Education and Faculty of tourism and hospitality, Rehabilitation, University of Belgrade, UKLO, North Macedonia; Serbia D-r Sc. Aleksandra Gruevska- D-r Sc. Branislav Simonović, Faculty of Drakulevski, Law Faculty Iustinianus Law, University of Kragujevac, Serbia; Primus, UKIM, North Macedonia; D-r Sc. Darko Maver, Faculty of D-r Sc. Strashko Stojanovski, Law Criminal Justice and Security, University Faculty, Goce Delchev University, North of Maribor, Slovenia; Macedonia; D-r Sc. Gorazd Meško, Faculty of D-r Sc. Svetlana Veljanoska, Law Criminal Justice and Security, University Faculty, UKLO, North Macedonia; of Maribor, Slovenia; D-r Sc. Vesna Trajanovska, International Balkan University, North Macedonia; Editorial Board: D-r Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Nominalia of the Bulgarian Rulers an Essay by Ilia Curto Pelle
    Nominalia of the Bulgarian rulers An essay by Ilia Curto Pelle Bulgaria is a country with a rich history, spanning over a millennium and a half. However, most Bulgarians are unaware of their origins. To be honest, the quantity of information involved can be overwhelming, but once someone becomes invested in it, he or she can witness a tale of the rise and fall, steppe khans and Christian emperors, saints and murderers of the three Bulgarian Empires. As delving deep in the history of Bulgaria would take volumes upon volumes of work, in this essay I have tried simply to create a list of all Bulgarian rulers we know about by using different sources. So, let’s get to it. Despite there being many theories for the origin of the Bulgars, the only one that can show a historical document supporting it is the Hunnic one. This document is the Nominalia of the Bulgarian khans, dating back to the 8th or 9th century, which mentions Avitohol/Attila the Hun as the first Bulgarian khan. However, it is not clear when the Bulgars first joined the Hunnic Empire. It is for this reason that all the Hunnic rulers we know about will also be included in this list as khans of the Bulgars. The rulers of the Bulgars and Bulgaria carry the titles of khan, knyaz, emir, elteber, president, and tsar. This list recognizes as rulers those people, who were either crowned as any of the above, were declared as such by the people, despite not having an official coronation, or had any possession of historical Bulgarian lands (in modern day Bulgaria, southern Romania, Serbia, Albania, Macedonia, and northern Greece), while being of royal descent or a part of the royal family.
    [Show full text]
  • Historiography in the Republic of Macedonia After
    ULF/161-182elis 23-11-04 16:12 ™ÂÏ›‰·161 VOLUME 4 (2003-4) HISTOREIN In 2001, when the Albanian extremist National Liberation Army (UCˇK) fought security troops of the Republic of Macedonia, a number of Mace- donian historians offered explanations for the Serving bloodshed. They denounced the claims of the Albanian rebels as well as the Albanian political the Nation: parties by referring to their alleged plans for a Greater Albania, although there is little evidence that this idea was popular among the Albanians Historiography of former Yugoslavia.1 Historians gave inter- views to newspapers and wrote editorials stating in the Republic that Albanian claims for more rights within the state were simply camouflaging their real goal of of Macedonia seceding from Macedonia. They pointed to a presumably long tradition of Albanian national- ism and extremism in the region, expressed, for (FYROM) example, by the annexation of western Macedo- nia by Albania during World War II. They also After Socialism* deplored the demographic Albanization of parts of Macedonia and described it as a deliberate strategy to push out ethnic Macedonians.2 By calling upon certain past events perceived as traumatic and mobilizing deep-rooted stereo- types and prejudices against the country’s largest minority, these historians sought to Ulf Brunnbauer manipulate public opinion and shape political responses to the security crisis. They linked the current security crisis to so-called historical tra- ditions and roots and saw Macedonian national identity jeopardized by Albanian extremists. Events were perceived and explained in such a way that they became part of a mythological narration of victimization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iron Curtain As an Aspect of the Sovietisation of Eastern Europe in 1949–1953
    Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej ■ LII-SI(1) Paweł Bielicki Institute of Political Sciences, Kazimierz Wielki University The Iron Curtain as an Aspect of the Sovietisation of Eastern Europe in 1949–1953 Zarys treści: Sowietyzacja była kluczowym etapem prowadzącym do utrwalenia „żelaznej kur- tyny” na terenie Europy Wschodniej i pełnego podporządkowania krajów wschodnioeuro- pejskich Związkowi Radzieckiemu. W artykule omawiam rożne aspekty sowietyzacji, m.in. wymiar ustrojowy, gospodarczy oraz wojskowy. W ostatniej z wyżej wymienionych dziedzin pozwoliłem sobie na wyartykułowanie przyczyn, które sprawiły, że władze sowieckie pod- jęły decyzję o przeprowadzeniu przyspieszonej sowietyzacji w dziedzinie militarnej na terenie Europy Wschodniej. Ważnym elementem niniejszego artykułu jest też kwestia prześladowa- nia Kościoła w państwach zdominowanych przez ZSRR. W podsumowaniu nakreślam konse- kwencje omawianych w artykule wydarzeń dla współczesnej rzeczywistości politycznej krajów postkomunistycznych w wymiarze politycznym, gospodarczym oraz społecznym. Outline of content: Sovietisation was the key stage leading to the strengthening of the Iron Curtain sealing off Eastern Europe and to the total subjugation of Eastern European countries to the Soviet Union. In the article, the author discusses various aspects of Sovietisation, emphasising its political, economic and military aspects, including the reasons underlying the decision taken by the Soviet leaders to step up the pace of Sovietisation in the military field in Eastern Europe. An important part of the present study is also the question of the persecution of the Church in the states dominated by the USSR. In the conclusions, the author discusses the consequences of the described developments for the contemporary political situation of the post-communist countries in their political, economic and social aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution-Making in the Informal Soviet Empire in Eastern Europe, East Asia, and Inner Asia, 1945–19551
    Constitution-Making in the Informal Soviet Empire in Eastern Europe, East Asia, and Inner Asia, 1945–19551 Ivan Sablin Heidelberg University Abstract This chapter provides an overview of dependent constitution-making under one-party regimes in Albania, Bulgaria, China, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, North Korea, Mongolia, Poland, Romania, and Yugoslavia during the first decade after the Second World War. Employing and further developing the concept of the informal Soviet empire, it discusses the structural adjustments in law and governance in the Soviet dependencies. The chapter outlines the development of the concepts of “people’s republic” and “people’s democracy” and discusses the process of adoption and the authorship of the constitutions. It then compares their texts with attention to sovereignty and political subjectivity, supreme state institutions, and the mentions of the Soviet Union, socialism, and ruling parties. Finally, it surveys the role of nonconstitutional institutions in political practices and their reflection in propaganda. The process of constitution-making followed the imperial logic of hierarchical yet heterogeneous governance, with multiple vernacular and Soviet actors partaking in drafting and adopting the constitutions. The texts ascribed sovereignty and political subjectivity to the people, the toilers, classes, nationalities, and regions, often in different combinations. Most of the constitutions established a parliamentary body as the supreme institution, disregarding separation of powers, and introduced a standing body to perform the supreme functions, including legislation, between parliamentary sessions, which became a key element in the legal adjustment. Some constitutions mentioned socialism, the Soviet Union, and the ruling parties. The standardization of governance in the informal Soviet empire manifested itself in the constitutional documents only partially.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative
    TEACHING THE HISTORY OF THE COMMUNISM TEACHING THE HISTORY OF THE COMMUNISM Published by: Hannah Arendt Center – Sofia 2013 This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies, the Hannah Arendt Center - Sofia and Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication receives funding from the European Parliament. The Centre for European Studies, the Hannah Arendt Center -Sofia, the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication or any subsequent use of the information contained therein. Sole responsibility lies on the author of the publication. The processing of the publication was concluded in 2013 The Centre for European Studies (CES) is the political foundation of the European People’s Party (EPP) dedicated to the promotion of Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. For more information please visit: www.thinkingeurope.eu TEACHING THE HISTORY OF THE COMMUNISM Editor: Vasil Kadrinov Print: AVTOPRINT www.avtoprint.com E-mail: [email protected] Phohe: +359 889 032 954 2 Kiril Hristov Str., 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria Teaching the History of the Communism Content Teaching the History of the Communist Regimes in Post-1989 Eastern Europe - Methodological and Sensitive Issues, Raluca Grosescu ..................5 National representative survey on the project: “Education about the communist regime and the european democratic values of the young people in Bulgaria today”, 2013 .......................................................14 Distribution of the data of the survey ...........................................................43 - 3 - Teaching the History of the Communism Teaching the History of the Communist Regimes in Post-1989 Eastern Europe Methodological and Sensitive Issues Raluca Grosescu The breakdown of dictatorial regimes generally implies a process of rewriting history through school curricula and textbooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Geographies of transition heritage, identity and tourism in post-socialist Bulgaria Naumov, Nikola Sotirov Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 06. Oct. 2021 GEOGRAPHIES OF TRANSITION: HERITAGE, IDENTITY AND TOURISM IN POST-SOCIALIST BULGARIA A THESIS SUBMITTED BY Nikola Sotirov Naumov BSc MBA MSc IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 21 MAY 2018 KING’S COLLEGE LONDON Abstract In 1989 the fall of the Soviet Union brought new economic, socio-cultural and political realities to many Eastern European states, which were faced with a long and difficult period of transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Des Participants
    World Heritage 43 COM WHC/19/43.COM/INF.2 Paris, July/ juillet 2019 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE/ COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Forty-third session / Quarante-troisième session Baku, Republic of Azerbaijan / Bakou, République d’Azerbaïdjan 30 June – 10 July 2019 / 30 juin - 10 juillet 2019 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS LISTE DES PARTICIPANTS This list is based on the information provided by participants themselves, however if you have any corrections, please send an email to: [email protected] Cette liste est établie avec des informations envoyées par les participants, si toutefois vous souhaitez proposer des corrections merci d’envoyer un email à : [email protected] Members of the Committee / Membres du Comité ............................................................ 5 Angola ............................................................................................................................... 5 Australia ............................................................................................................................ 5 Azerbaijan ......................................................................................................................... 7 Bahrain .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]