DOCSLIB.ORG

Michael C. Sloan Phd Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Michael C. Sloan Phd Thesis The Harmonious Organ of Sedulius Scottus: an introduction and translation of selections of his Collectaneum in Apostolum Michael Collier Sloan Ph.D. August 7, 2010 i Abstract Most of the limited scholarship on Sedulius Scottus focuses on his poems and treatise, De Rectoribus Christianis. As the product of a central ecclesiastical figure in Liège, the intellectual capital of Louis the German‟s kingdom, Sedulius‟ biblical exegesis also deserves study. The Carolingians revered classical society and culture and at the same time sought to become a wholly Christian empire, thus, it is not surprising that the content of Sedulius‟ Collectaneum in Apostolum contains both classical and Christian elements. In 1997, J. Frede published a critical edition of Sedulius‟ Collectaneum in Apostolum, but there remains today neither a translation nor specific study of this work in any modern language. My thesis seeks to provide an introduction and translation for the Prologue and commentaries on Galatians and Ephesians as contained in Frede‟s critical edition of Sedulius Scottus‟ Collectaneum in Apostolum. After situating Sedulius in his historical context and highlighting the tradition of biblical collectanea, I present external evidence – which demonstrates Sedulius‟ familiarity with Donatus‟ Vita and Servius‟ commentary on the Aeneid – as well as intertextual links to the latter works to argue that Servius‟ pedagogical commentary served as a literary model for Sedulius‟ Collectaneum. I also introduce and explain Sedulius‟ organizing template for the Prologue, which is his employment of the classical rhetorical schema, “the seven types of circumstance”. This schema is an important rhetorical tool of many classical and medieval authors that has heretofore been misrepresented as originating from Hermagoras. Sedulius‟ literary style and format are examined as matters of introduction, which further reveals the influence of Servius. The commentaries within the Collectaneum in Apostolum are essentially based on older, formative religious writers such as Jerome, ii Augustine, and Pelagius. Not only do I survey Sedulius‟ doctrinal stances on important theological and ecclesiastical issues of his time, but I discuss Sedulius‟ reception of the above three authors in particular and demonstrate how his Collectaneum in Apostolum attempts to harmonize their sometimes discordant voices. iii SUBMISSION OF PHD AND MPHIL THESES REQUIRED DECLARATIONS 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Michael C. Sloan, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 80,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2005 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph.D. in September 2006; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2005 and 2010. Date 03/08/10 signature of candidate 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Ph.D. in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date 03/08/10 signature of supervisor 3. Permission for electronic publication: (to be signed by both candidate and supervisor) In submitting this thesis to the University of St Andrews we understand that we are giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby. We also understand that the title and the abstract will be published, and that a copy of the work may be made and supplied to any bona fide library or research worker, that my thesis will be electronically accessible for personal or research use unless exempt by award of an embargo as requested below, and that the library has the right to migrate my thesis into new electronic forms as required to ensure continued access to the thesis. We have obtained any third-party copyright permissions that may be required in order to allow such access and migration, or have requested the appropriate embargo below. The following is an agreed request by candidate and supervisor regarding the electronic publication of this thesis: (ii) Access to all of printed copy but embargo of all of electronic publication of thesis for a period of five years on the following ground(s): publication would preclude future publication. Date 03/08/10 signature of candidate signature of supervisor Acknowledgments It is with great joy and gratitude that I make mention of professional and personal (and in many instances both) influences without whose help and support this project would not have come to fruition. It has been a superlative honor and privilege to undertake this thesis with Karla Pollmann as my supervisor, whose vision, talents, and industry have vaulted the “After Augustine Project”, underwritten by a generous grant from the Leverhulme Trust, into an international venture of significant academic import. I am proud to have contributed to the After Augustine Project as a resident PhD student and am thankful to have worked with such talented and supportive people, namely: Carmen Cvetkovic, Symke Haverkamp, Arnoud Visser, David Lambert, and Mark Elliot. My examiners, Roger Rees internally and Roger Green externally, were ideal readers whose comments and suggestions made this thesis a better product and me a better scholar. I have also enjoyed the support and influence of fellow PhD students in the Classics Department with whom I shared an office, friendship, and ideas: Jamie McIntyre, Jeremy Armstrong, Gwynaeth McIntyre, Hannah Swithinbank, Joe Howley, and Laurie Wilson. Simone Simmerer, whose path I have crossed in Austria, Germany, England, and Scotland at various conferences, deserves my warmest thanks for her aid on many lines of my project. I also enjoyed the generosity of the Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (ÖAW) when hosting the workshop “Edieren lateinischer patristischer Texte”, which initiated two years of collaboration that resulted in the publication of a critical text. My work there significantly improved the quality of this thesis. While many were involved in that project, I should like to especially mention Dorothea Weber and Hildegund Mueller. The entire school of Classics at the University of St Andrews, faculty and staff, deserve my thanks – but especially Harry Hine, who kindly and astutely read and commented on sections of my translation, as well as Emily Greenwood, Emma Gee, Jon Hesk, and Sian Lewis, who have all been particularly helpful in administrative and academic matters which arose in the course of study. Not only has the scholarship of John Contreni in particular been very influential on this thesis, but he also graciously read and commented on a chapter, even though we have never met nor have any connection other than sharing the same vineyard. Jeff Hunt, my current colleague and former fellow undergraduate, also deserves my deepest thanks for his close reading of a number of chapters. Thelma Mathews too has positively impacted this thesis, and I am equally grateful for her kind administrative assistance. As an interdisciplinary project, I enjoyed the interest and contributions of a number of people from various departments, including: David Farrell, Ben Montanez, Donovan McAbee, Eric Langley, Richard Gormley, Margaux Poueymirou, Kristine Johanson, Phil Baiocci, John Freker, TV Fowler, Tim Roberts, Gordon Bottomley, Blake Pearson, Barrett Hall, Rusty Belden, Andrew Bach, Lee Casterline, Andy Myers, Ben Hagood, Kyle Surratt, Mike Trozzo, and Mark Maennle. As the capstone of many years in higher education, this thesis would not have been possible without the devotion and instruction of a number of former professors and mentors, especially: Alden Smith, who was profoundly instrumental in my decision to add Classics as a major; John Thorburn, from whom I took eight courses as an undergraduate; David Lyle Jeffrey, whose literature course and general advice continue v to inspire me; Tommye Lou Davis, a venerable Professor of Latin from whose methods and wisdom I often glean; and P. Henry Deer, a co-inquirer of truth and discerning man of letters. Finally, I should like to extend my deepest love and appreciation to my family, who continue to be a source of unconditional love and support. My brothers and sisters make the cliché “friends like family” still meaningful. From oldest to youngest, they are: Charissa, who in the midst of finishing her third graduate degree meticulously proofread every word of the introduction and offered the most detailed of corrections; Bryan (and his wife Amy); Eraina (and her husband Bryan); Alathea (and her husband Justin); Sophie (and her husband Mac); and Paul. My mother and father, Sue and Robert, tirelessly provided every means of support possible. From start to finish my mother has been my most enthusiastic supporter and encourager. My father, a gifted interpreter of texts, has read (and reread…) this thesis with fervor and grace. Innumerous phone calls, emails, and hours away from mom are due to his dedication and invaluable help, and the only acknowledgment grand enough for their investment awaits them in heaven. My in- laws are not deserving of the disparaging stereo type this label often entails. Tim and Deb have loved me as a son, for which I am profoundly grateful, and have been overly generous in their support of Ali, Collier, and me. My wife, Ali, receives the dubious honor of having this thesis dedicated to her. I know only half of the sacrifices she has made as this thesis was written, for those I am endlessly indebted. Her smile and presence brighten even the darkest nights at a desk; it is a joy to share this life with her and now too with our newly born son, Collier.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eriugena's Intervention in the Debate on Predestination
    Chapter 10 Eriugena’s Intervention in the Debate on Predestination Ernesto Sergio Mainoldi 1 Introduction The theme of predestination, with its various and conflicting interpretations that have emerged during the history of theology, illustrates the difficulties in defining the mode of interaction between human freedom and divine Grace in the path toward salvation, and, more, the compatibility between human freedom and divine omnipotence and omniscience. For the Latin West the ul- timately unresolved reflections of Augustine of Hippo on these problems have constituted an unavoidable touchstone, which the theologians were called to deal with on several occasions. The bishop of Hippo’s results were in fact dictated by the urgency to contrast the heretical readings spread in his time, which offered unilateral solutions to the question of the relationship between human freedom and divine order. When called to face Manichaeism and its establishment of a principle of evil as equivalent and opposed to a principle of good, which, determines the subordination of human actions to necessity, (relying upon the opposition of the two principles of good and evil) Augustine set a particular emphasis on the freedom of choice. Years later, he was called to contrast the heresy of Pelagianism, which diminished the role of Grace in salvation, by emphasizing the importance of asceticism and free will. Against the Pelagian perspective, the African doctor developed a theology of Grace, which arrived at the conviction that it is impossible for man to resist sin, since the human will lost its freedom to do good after having committed original sin, without the help of Grace.
    [Show full text]
  • H-France Review Vol. 19 (July 2019), No. 139 Rachel Stone and Charles West, Eds., Hincma
    H-France Review Volume 19 (2019) Page 1 H-France Review Vol. 19 (July 2019), No. 139 Rachel Stone and Charles West, eds., Hincmar of Rheims: Life and Work. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2015. xvi + 309 pp. Figures, tables, map, notes, bibliography, index. $120.00 U.S. (hb). ISBN 978-0-7190-9140-7; $34.95 U.S. (pb). ISBN 978-1-5261-0654-4; $34.95 U.S. (eb). ISBN 978-1-7849-9189-0. Review by John J. Contreni, Purdue University Hincmar served as archbishop of Reims from 845 to his death in 882. Although little known outside the world of modern Carolingian scholarship, he was the ninth century’s Cardinal Richelieu, albeit a much more prolific author and, one suspects, a more committed churchman. He cut a giant swath through ninth-century ecclesiastical and political history, serving with (never under) four successive West Frankish monarchs. Born sometime during the first decade of the century during the reign of Emperor Charlemagne (768-814), he died fleeing Viking marauders with his church’s treasures in a changed world ruled by a congeries of small kings and fractious warlords. As Rachel Stone states in her meaty introduction to this collection, Hincmar’s impact was “surprisingly slight” (p. 27). We study his voluminous and varied written legacy (history, law, hagiography, poetry, correspondence, prescriptive documents of all sorts, opinions on all that mattered) primarily to gain insight into his vision of Carolingian society and to the changing world around him. This “life and works” collection aims to bring together between two covers recent work on many facets of the archbishop’s career to counter-balance the potential idiosyncrasy of a single-author study.
    [Show full text]
  • Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown Andrew C
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Maxwell Institute Publications 2011 Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown Andrew C. Skinner D. Morgan Davis Carl Griffin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi Part of the Religious Education Commons Recommended Citation Skinner, Andrew C.; Davis, D. Morgan; and Griffin,a C rl, "Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown" (2011). Maxwell Institute Publications. 17. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi/17 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maxwell Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. bountiful harvest bountiful harvest essays in honor of s. kent brown Edited by Andrew C. Skinner, D. Morgan Davis, and Carl Griffin Cover design by Stephen Hales Creative, Inc. Frontispiece by Mark A. Philbrick Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602 maxwellinstitute.byu.edu © 2011 The Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bountiful harvest : essays in honor of S. Kent Brown / edited by Andrew C. Skinner, D. Morgan Davis, and Carl Griffin. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8425-2804-7 (alk. paper) 1. Theology. 2. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I. Brown, S. Kent. II. Skinner, Andrew C., 1951- III.
    [Show full text]
  • Prudentius of Troyes (D. 861) and the Reception of the Patristic Tradition in the Carolingian Era
    Prudentius of Troyes (d. 861) and the Reception of the Patristic Tradition in the Carolingian Era by Jared G. Wielfaert A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto © Copyright by Jared Wielfaert 2015 Prudentius of Troyes (d. 861) and the Reception of the Patristic Tradition in the Carolingian Era Jared Gardner Wielfaert Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto 2015 ABSTRACT: This study concerns Prudentius, bishop of Troyes (861), a court scholar, historian, and pastor of the ninth century, whose extant corpus, though relatively extensive, remains unstudied. Born in Spain in the decades following the Frankish conquest of the Spanish march, Prudentius had been recruited to the Carolingian court under Louis the Pious, where he served as a palace chaplain for a twenty year period, before his eventual elevation to the see of Troyes in the 840s. With a career that moved from the frontier to the imperial court center, then back to the local world of the diocese and environment of cathedral libraries, sacred shrines, and local care of souls, the biography of Prudentius provides a frame for synthesis of several prevailing currents in the cultural history of the Carolingian era. His personal connections make him a rare link between the generation of the architects of the Carolingian reforms (Theodulf and Alcuin) and their students (Rabanus Maurus, Prudentius himself) and the great period of fruition of which the work of John Scottus Eriugena is the most widely recogized example. His involvement in the mid-century theological controversy over the doctrine of predestination illustrates the techniques and methods, as well as the concerns and preoccupations, of Carolingian era scholars engaged in the consolidation and interpretation of patristic opinion, particularly, that of Augustine.
    [Show full text]
  • Apocrypha and Toledot Yeshu in Medieval Europe
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Theology & Religious Studies College of Arts and Sciences 3-2020 Infancy Stories of Jesus: Apocrypha and Toledot Yeshu in Medieval Europe Natalie Latteri Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/thrs Part of the Christianity Commons, Cultural History Commons, History of Religion Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, and the Social History Commons Infancy Stories of Jesus: Apocrypha and Toledot Yeshu in Medieval Europe Natalie E. Latteri* Stories of Jesus have circulated among Christians since the first century of the Common Era. Such lore functioned to provide early Christians who were eager to learn about their savior with information about his conception, life, death, and resurrection. Some made it into the canonical New Testament Gospel accounts but much of it, for one reason or another, did not. Even so, versions of many of the stories remained popular among Christians throughout the centuries and continued to supplement the biblical text while addressing the concerns of story tellers and their audience. For purposes of this paper, the entirety of these extra-canonical Christian texts is referred to simply as apocrypha. Like the canonical Gospel accounts and later hagiography, or (semi) fictional accounts of saints’ lives, apocryphal stories of Jesus also offered entertainment and a type of model behavior for readers and listeners to emulate.1 * Natalie E. Latteri earned her PhD in History from the University of New Mexico. She teaches Jewish-Christian Relations at the University of San Francisco in the Swig Program in Jewish Studies and Social Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Micah's Bethlehem and Matthew's
    The Journal of Northwest Theological Seminary Volume 22, Number 3 December 2007 1 “vita vestra abscondita est cum Christo in Deo”—Col. 3:3 KERUX: THE JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY For the Faculty: James T. Dennison, Jr. (Editor), Scott F. Sanborn, J. Peter Vosteen Typing and formatting: Tin L. Harrell 1. MICAH’S BETHLEHEM AND MATTHEW’S.................................................4 James T. Dennison, Jr. 2. O REMEMBER ADAM’S FALL........................................................................12 3. IN MAROSSZENTIMRE CHURCH..............................................................16 Jékely Zoltán 4. GOTTSHALK OF ORBAIS: A MEDIEVAL PREDESTINARIAN................17 Francis X. Gumerlock 5. RUDIMENTA PIETATIS....................................................................................35 Andrew Duncan Introduction by James T. Dennison, Jr.; Translation by Richard W. Bishop III 6. REVIEWS..............................................................................................................50 KERUX is a publication of Northwest Theological Seminary and appears three times each year (May, September, December). Editorial offices are located at 17711 Spruce Way, Lynnwood, WA 98037-7431. Correspondence should be directed to the editor at this address. Subscription rates for one year are: $20.00 (U.S. and Canada); $25.00 (Elsewhere). All remit- tances should be made payable in U. S. Funds. KERUX is: abstracted in New Testament Abstracts, Cambridge, MA, Old Testament Abstracts, Washingon, DC and Religious and Theological Abstracts, Myerstown, PA; indexed in ATLA Religion Database, Chicago, IL and the Elenchus of Biblica, Rome, Italy. Visit our Website: kerux.com ISSN 0888-8513 December 2007 Vol. 22, No. 3 2 Introduction This issue of Kerux contains material from scholars working on primary documents. Dr. Frank Gumerlock has submitted his English translation of the Gottschalk corpus to a major university publishing house and has been en- couraged by a positive preliminary response.
    [Show full text]
  • Gottschalk of Orbais' Teachings on Predestination
    ROCZNIKI FILOZOFICZNE Tom LXV, numer 3 – 2017 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rf.2017.65.3-3 ANDRZEJ P. STEFAŃCZYK * DOCTRINAL CONTROVERSIES OF THE CAROLINGIAN RENAISSANCE: GOTTSCHALK OF ORBAIS’ TEACHINGS ON PREDESTINATION* This paper is intended to outline the main areas of controversy in the dispute over predestination in the 9th century, which shook up or electrified the whole world of contemporary Western Christianity and was the most se- rious doctrinal crisis since Christian antiquity. In the first part I will sketch out the consequences of the writings of St. Augustine and the revival of sci- entific life and theological and philosophical reflection, which resulted in the emergence of new solutions and aporias in Christian doctrine—the dispute over the Eucharist and the controversy about trina deitas. In the second part, which constitutes the main body of the article, I will focus on the presenta- tion of four sources of controversies in the dispute over predestination, whose inventor and proponent was Gottschalk of Orbais, namely: (i) the concept of God, (ii) the meaning of grace, nature and free will, (iii) the rela- tion of foreknowledge to predestination, and (iv) the doctrine of redemption, i.e., in particular, the relation of justice to mercy. The article is mainly an attempt at an interpretation of the texts of the epoch, mainly by Gottschalk of Orbais1 and his adversary, Hincmar of Reims.2 I will point out the dif- Dr ANDRZEJ P. STEFAŃCZYK — Katedra Historii Filozofii Starożytnej i Średniowiecznej, Wy- dział Filozofii Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II; adres do korespondencji: Al.
    [Show full text]
  • Heresy and Dissent in the Carolingian Empire: the Case of Gottschalk of Orbais
    Published on Reviews in History (https://reviews.history.ac.uk) Heresy and Dissent in the Carolingian Empire: the Case of Gottschalk of Orbais Review Number: 2153 Publish date: Thursday, 17 August, 2017 Author: Matthew Bryan Gillis ISBN: 9780198797586 Date of Publication: 2017 Price: £65.00 Pages: 288pp. Publisher: Oxford University Press Publisher url: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/heresy-and-dissent-in-the-carolingian-empire- 9780198797586?cc=gb&lang=en& Place of Publication: Oxford Reviewer: Scott Ashley Empires throughout world history have more often than not seen themselves as part of some cosmic grand narrative, set on earth to enact the will of the god or gods, spiritual or secular, they claim to serve. The Carolingian Empire was no exception. Committed to expanding the boundaries of Christianity beyond the frontiers while combatting cultural entropy within through the ceaseless correction of errant belief and practice, the Carolingians may well have saved at least some of western Europe’s classical inheritance ‘by the skin of our teeth’ (to use Kenneth Clark’s formulation). But they also created an authoritarian and intolerant political and religious culture that ground down those who could not or would not fit in. Matthew Bryan Gillis’s impressive book is a study of one of those dissenters from Carolingian orthodoxy, the monk, poet, and theologian Gottschalk of Orbais, who became also its most famous victim. By telling the story of Gottschalk’s life, ideas, and subsequent condemnation and imprisonment for heresy, Gillis has created a compelling and necessary drama not only of authority and resistance but of internal conflict and self- fashioning that illuminates aspects of early-medieval history far beyond its immediate focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers Not Yet Decentralised
    TEACHERS NOT YET DECENTRALISED NO LASTNAME FIRSTNAME DATE OF FIRST APPOINTMENT 763 ABAMILE JUSTO 31-12-1938 226 ABURA SIRINO 03-03-1925 1039 ABURE JOHN 06-12-1943 1152 ACEGER ASIO PAULINE 29-09-1947 1012 ACHENG AGNES ONGOM P 10-09-1948 895 ACHOPU MARTIN 11-01-1966 1051 ACHUROBWE ALICE KATUSABE 23-04-1945 1181 ACIKU DARWIN CHARLES 03-04-1951 370 ACOLA HELLEN 01-01-1937 822 ACUBA JOSEPH 16-05-1940 41 ACURAOBWE HEZIRONI 09-03-1919 1111 ADAPET BERNADETTE 28-12-1948 582 ADEBO YUSUF 01-12-1930 753 ADELE AZUBILE 01-08-1933 1140 ADIBA FAUSTINE 09-05-1943 1064 ADIBO MARK 01-09-1945 291 ADIIBA BENEDICT 01-12-1927 1130 ADOKIAMUNA ELIZABETH OPULE 10-01-1959 578 ADONG MARGARET OKWI (MRS) 20-05-1943 1280 ADONG SANTA 06-06-1952 954 ADONGA FRED OGWENG 15-08-1957 295 ADRAPI ISAKA 01-01-1928 1145 ADRAPI IJINO 31-01-1941 376 ADUPA GEMMA 15-12-1932 568 AGABA ZERUBABERI 20-03-1932 969 AGETTA WILLIAM 31-08-1949 953 AGOI ASEA MEREKO STEPHEN 24-09-1957 1197 AGUTI AGNES SHELLY 14-10-1950 1207 AGWA VICTOR 26-12-1948 1279 AHIMBISIBWE JOHNNY 21-02-1946 614 AHURRA HOORI CATHERINE JOYCE 19-03-1940 644 AIKU DAVID 15-09-1928 1302 AINOMUJUNI SOLLOMY 31-07-1945 819 AJER YUVENTINO 18-08-1930 1277 AKATEKIT MUBBALA CHRISTINE 02-06-1944 773 AKELLO JOSEPHINE 02-06-1932 859 AKELLO MAGARET 08-12-1964 1014 AKELLO LUCY 09-03-1942 1016 AKELLO CECILIA 23-12-1942 1174 AKELLO RUTH 12-04-1949 856 AKIA FLORENCE 15-08-1969 1286 AKIBAI CHARLES 15-03-1953 1232 AKOBOPOBO JACKSON 02-02-1941 15 AKODO ALFRED 15-06-1920 394 AKOL CHARLES 06-08-1943 756 AKUGIZIBWE EDITH 01-10-1939 1072 AKULLU
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the EDICT of PÎTRES, CAROLINGIAN DEFENCE AGAINST the VIKINGS, and the ORIGINS of the MEDIEVAL CASTLE by Simon Maclean READ 8
    1 THE EDICT OF PÎTRES, CAROLINGIAN DEFENCE AGAINST THE VIKINGS, AND THE ORIGINS OF THE MEDIEVAL CASTLE By Simon MacLean READ 8 FEBRUARY 2019 ABSTRACT: The castle is one of the most characteristic features of the Western European landscape in the Middle Ages, dominating social and political order from the eleventh century onwards. The origins of the castle are generally assigned to the ninth and tenth centuries, and the standard story begins with the defensive fortifications established against the Vikings during the reign of the West Frankish king Charles the Bald (843–77). In this article I argue that there are serious problems with this origin story, by re-evaluating some of the key sources on which it rests – particularly the Edict of Pîtres (864). I seek to demonstrate that my analysis of this source has important implications for how we think about the relationship between fortifications and the state in the Carolingian Empire; and by extension the evolution of the castle in north-western Europe between the ninth and twelfth centuries. 1. Introduction The Edict of Pîtres of 25 July 864 is one of the most celebrated of the 350 or so capitularies promulgated by the kings and emperors of the Carolingian dynasty. The Carolingians ruled the Frankish kingdoms which dominated Western Europe during the eighth and ninth centuries, and the capitularies were their characteristic form of legislation – a heterogeneous genre, but broadly speaking recognisable as records of royal proclamations divided into chapters, often expressed in a legislative or exhortatory voice.1 The Edict was issued by one of the most enthusiastic Carolingian legislators: Charles the Bald, who ruled the West Frankish kingdom (approximately equivalent to modern France) between 843 and 877.
    [Show full text]
  • 180 BOOK REVIEWS Pierre Chambert-Protat, Jérémy Delmulle
    180 BOOK REVIEWS Pierre Chambert-Protat, Jérémy Delmulle, Warren Pezé, Jeremy C. Thompson (eds.), La controverse carolingienne sur la prédestination. Histoire, textes, manuscrits, Haut Moyen Âge 32, Turnhout, Brepols, 2018, 322 pp., ISBN: 9782503577951. Cloth €75 Reseñado por RODRIGO BALLON VILLANUEVA Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, ES [email protected] This is the first collective volume devoted entirely to the Carolingian controversy on predestination. The book is the result of an international conference that took place in Paris on October 11 – 12, 2013. From the 840s to the 860s, the Carolingian Empire (800 – 888) was involved in a major polemic regarding the nature of salvation and condemnation of the human soul in relation to God’s eternal will and knowledge. The origins of the debate – the most heated during this time – are found in the preaching of a Benedictine monk named Gottschalk of Orbais (ca. 808 – 868). The doctrine spread by Gottschalk stated that there is a double, or twofold, predestination ( gemina praedestinatio ), that is, that God, from his eternity, destines the elect to paradise and the reprobates to damnation. This teaching produced the die-hard animosity of archbishops Rabanus Maurus (ca. 780 – 856) and Hincmar of Reims (806 – 882), although it also found many supporters, which divided the intellectual landscape of the 9 th century. Over nine councils and three generations, the brightest minds of the Carolingian Empire were confronted by a polemic that was not restricted to the clergy. Certainly, all types of actors from all of the Frankish kingdoms took part in the debate: simple clerics and monks, bishops and archbishops, schoolmasters, aristocratic groups, the Pope, and the Emperor himself.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Flannery's “The Anguish of the Jews”: a Forgotten Feat
    Edward Flannery's “The Anguish of the Jews”: A forgotten feat Ari Belenkiy The book, which my sister Helen ran across in the library while pursuing her degree at a Boston college, became the center of our family life for the next decade. The author of the book subtitled “Twenty Three Centuries of anti-Semitism” was a Catholic priest of high standing. My father, Mark Belenkiy, a retired physician and author some 100 papers on medicine, decided to translate the book into Russian. He finished the first draft in 2-3 years and asked me whether the author might still be alive. It was 1995 and I was finishing my degree at the University of California at Irvine, where I befriended another Catholic priest, mathematician Kurt Burnette. I re-addressed my father’s request and the next day Kurt brought a thick Catholic Church directory and pointed to an entry somewhere in its middle: Reverend Edward Flannery, Providence, Rhode Island, address, telephone… The same evening I called the number and had a short talk with the author. In a few days my father got a letter bearing the return address of the Eparchy of Providence. In the letter, the first of a dozen, Reverend Flannery warmly encouraged us to publish the Russian translation - the book was already translated into French, Spanish and Portuguese. Flannery warned, however, that the first American 1965 edition was followed in 1985 by a second one with two new chapters; the first supplying his theme by events from the mid-1960s to mid-1980s, the second analyzing the roots of anti-Semitism (Christian in particular) more profoundly than before.
    [Show full text]