ASA GRAY and the DEVELOPMENT of BRYOLOGY in the UNITED STATES Author(S): Norton G
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ASA GRAY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRYOLOGY IN THE UNITED STATES Author(s): Norton G. Miller Source: Harvard Papers in Botany , December 2010, Vol. 15, No. 2 (December 2010), pp. 287-304 Published by: Harvard University Herbaria Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41761699 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41761699?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Harvard University Herbaria is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Harvard Papers in Botany This content downloaded from 86.59.13.237 on Tue, 06 Jul 2021 08:58:36 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms ASA GRAY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRYOLOGY IN THE UNITED STATES Norton G. Miller1 Abstract. Asa Gray never expanded his knowledge of floristic bryology to the extent he developed expertise in flowering plant taxonomy. Nevertheless, he became experienced in bryological floristics early in his botanical career, and Gray absorbed new bryological information, both floristic and conceptual, throughout his life from wherever it was generated. He had plans to advance bryology in the United States, including an exsiccata and publishing a volume devoted to cryptogams as part two of the second edition of his Manual , but both never hap- pened. His respect for the bryological talent and energy of William S. Sullivant, whose achievements Gray con- sistently encouraged and fostered, allowed Sullivant, a non-academic in Columbus, Ohio, to become a highly regarded bryologist of international stature and the designated Father of American Bryology. The growth of bryo- floristic knowledge in the United States is traced from the earliest colonial period to later workers, including Dil- lenius, André Michaux, Palisot de Beauvois, Henry Muhlenberg, Lewis Schweinitz, Lewis Beck, and John Torrey, to Asa Gray, and eventually to William Sullivant. The bryological work and accomplishments of each of them show that all participated in a sophisticated international network of information exchange by letter or other con- veyance, thereby building important collections of bryophyte specimens and printed references. For some, this happened during the 1800s when improvements in compound light microscopy led to the resolution of morphol- ogy not before revealed with certainty in bryophytes and to conceptual advances in understanding the biology of these plants, which in turn allowed the discovery of the mesoscale structural uniqueness of them and continuing advancements in their systematics in the post-Sullivant era. Keywords: Asa Gray, William Sullivant, John Torrey, Lewis Schweinitz, Lewis Beck, Henry Muhlenberg, Palisot de Beauvois, André Michaux, Dillenius, history of bryology, history of botany " My desire to know every N. American plant with certainty is insatiable , as for foreign plants , let others explore them , there is room for all to study and admire the great variety. " - Henry Muhlenberg (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) to Dawson Turner (Yarmouth, England), 21 February 1803. Asa Gray's botanical accomplishments are reading letters and journal entries he wrote profound, durable, and generally understood during his first trip to Europe, 1838-1839 (J. to pertain to the flowering plants. Yet, through- Gray, 1893). Gray's career bridged the earliest out his career, and especially during the time attempts to document the North American flora he trained to become a physician and early inby colonial plantsmen, botanical explorers, and his botanical work, Gray maintained a lively a small group of native-born botanists, some probing interest in all branches of floristic, of whom took as their goal securing names for structural, and physiological botany as these American bryophytes, and the later botanists subjects were then defined, including bryo- that carried bryofloristic knowledge beyond the phytes and other cryptogams. This is clear from pioneer stage. I am grateful for information or assistance from the following: Robert Magill and Patricia Eckel (Missouri Botanical Garden), Ronald Stuckey (Ohio State University), Charles Sheviak (New York State Museum), Caryn Radick (Rutgers University Archives), Lynn Eaton (Rare Book, Manuscript, and Special Collections Library, Duke University), Stephen Sinon (LuEsther T. Mertz Library, New York Botanical Garden), and Daniel Weinstock, M.D., Geneva, New York. The last generously gave me permission to quote from unpublished letters of 19th century botanists in his collection. Sean P. Kilcoyne, Reference Archivist, Ohio Historical Society, helpfully searched the Sullivant family papers there for pertinent letters. Unless already published, all other quotations from letters are with permission of the institutional archive holding the original. Because this essay is in part about books and printed matter, it gives me much pleasure to acknowledge the great libraries I use regularly: New York State Library and its Manuscripts and Special Collection Division (Margaret Harris, Cindy Stark, Cara Janowsky, James Summa, and associates), University at Albany Library (Heather Swan Miller), and the Harvard University Botany Libraries (Judy Warnement and staff, especially Lisa DeCesare). Leigh Ann Smith and Patricia Kernan, New York State Museum, assembled the plate of images. 1 Biological Survey, New York State Museum, Albany, New York 12230-0001 , U.S.A. Email: [email protected] Harvard Papers in Botany , Vol. 15, No. 2, 2010, pp. 287-304. © President and Fellows of Harvard College, 2010. This content downloaded from 86.59.13.237 on Tue, 06 Jul 2021 08:58:36 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 288 HARVARD PAPERS IN BOTANY Vol. 15, No. 2 In this essay I explore connections Lewis Beck, and associates, between as well as bryolo- Asa Gray's botanical activities gists and bryophyteand the collectors devel- that Gray later opment of bryology in mentoredthe Unitedand influenced. States. I have sought to find bryological Asa Gray's links published between contributions are num- and among Gray and his predecessorserous, nearly 800 of them and in fact,con- and much temporaries and to ascertain has been how written bryological about his life, associates, knowledge accumulated inand accomplishments.the United A listStates of Gray's writ- from the late 1700s to the middle 1800s. This ings is available (Watson and Goodale, 1888), was a time of transition, during which bryolog- as is an index (Seymour, 1888). Selections of ical expertise developed in the United States Gray'sin letters, chronologically arranged, and an native-born botanists. In particular I sought autobiographyto of his first 30 years, were pub- establish what bryological books and specimens lished by Jane Loring Gray (1893), his wife. were used by the early workers, which in ret- Many of Gray's scientific and other writings rospect serve as an assessment of how well were a reprinted by Sargent (1889). In addi- worker was connected to mainstream bryology tion, the historian A. Hunter Dupree (1959) has of the time, and also the names of authorities written a richly informative biography of Asa to whom specimens were sent for identifica- Gray, with attention to the national and interna- tion or other response. Such information and tional intellectual mileau in which he worked. examination of authentic specimens from an These sources, plus letters and other records expert's herbarium help understand the often in the Gray Herbarium archives at Harvard varying early application of the technical names University and the collection there of of bryophytes. Grayana, provide much information pertain- Steere (1977) has assembled much fasci- ing to the topic outlined above. Additional nating information pertaining to bryologists primary sources were consulted at or from the and bryological progress for a later period, Rutgers University Archives; Duke University mostly the last half of the 19th and first half Archives;of LuEsther T. Mertz Library (New the 20th centuries. By contrast, my focus is Yorkon Botanical Garden); library of the the initial development of bryology in the Academy of Natural Sciences (Philadelphia); United States and Gray's role in helping Ohio Historical Society (Columbus); and the move bryological science in America from itsDivision of Manuscripts and Special Collec- earliest period into a more modern era. I present tions of the New York State Library (Albany). information that explores bryological work Scans of pertinent unpublished letters in the of the botanical collaborators, Asa Gray and collection of Daniel Weinstock, M. D. (Geneva, John Torrey, and their predecessors, principally New York) were also read. Henry Muhlenberg, Lewis von Schweinitz, Bryology in North America up to the Start of Asa Gray's botanical career Bryophytes had an almost inconsequential reached. My primary sources for names in this role in the work of plant collectors who ener- list were Dillenius (1741); Cardot (1899), who getically sought New World plant novelties for