DOCSLIB.ORG

Kansas State Rail Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kansas State Rail Plan Kansas State Rail Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction ......................................................................................... 9 1.1 The Rail System’s Role in Kansas 9 1.2 Federal Mandate for State Rail Plans 9 Chapter 2 – State Rail Plan Consultation and Vision ........................................ 11 2.1 Rail Plan Outreach Approach 11 2.1.1 Stakeholder Outreach and Involvement Plan ............................................................... 11 2.1.2 Public Meetings ........................................................................................................... 12 2.1.3 Stakeholder Interviews ................................................................................................. 13 2.1.4 State Rail Plan Advisory Committee ........................................................................... 13 2.2 Stakeholder Outreach Findings and Issues 13 2.2.1 Common Themes ......................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2 Divergent Themes ........................................................................................................ 15 2.2.3 Proposed Actions to Address Outreach Recommendations ......................................... 16 2.3 Rail Vision 17 2.4 Integration with the National Rail Plan 18 Chapter 3 – Public Rail Program Activities in Kansas ...................................... 19 3.1 Kansas’ Legislative Rail Authority 19 3.2 Kansas DOT’s Rail Organization and Roles 20 3.2.1 KDOT Freight and Rail Unit ....................................................................................... 20 3.2.2 KDOT Design-Coordinating Section ........................................................................... 22 3.3 Public Sector Rail Planning in Kansas 23 3.3.1 Kansas Department of Commerce ............................................................................... 23 3.3.2 Kansas Department of Agriculture .............................................................................. 23 3.3.3 Metropolitan Planning Organizations .......................................................................... 24 3.3.4 Local Economic Development Agencies ..................................................................... 25 3.4 State Rail Funding in Kansas 25 3.4.1 KDOT Rail Improvement Program.............................................................................. 26 3.4.2 KDOT Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Improvement Program .................................... 26 3.4.3 KDOT Rail Intercity Passenger Program .................................................................... 27 3.4.4 Kansas Department of Commerce Community Development Block Grant Program . 27 3.5 Federal Rail Programs and Funding Options 27 3.5.1 Federal Rail Intercity Passenger and High Speed Rail Programs ................................ 28 3.6 Rail-Related Legislative Proposals 34 3.7 Kansas Rail Studies 35 3.7.1 Rail Freight Studies ...................................................................................................... 35 3.7.2 Rail Passenger Studies ................................................................................................. 35 3.7.3 Studies Addressing Rail Freight and Passenger Issues ................................................ 36 3.8 Kansas’ Involvement in Multi-State Planning 36 Chapter 4 – Rail Inventory ................................................................................... 38 4.1 Summary of the Freight Rail System in Kansas 38 Final Report 1 Kansas State Rail Plan 4.2 The Class I Rail Network in Kansas 40 4.3 BNSF Railway 40 4.3.1 BNSF’s Main Corridors in Kansas .............................................................................. 41 4.3.2 BNSF’s Stations in Kansas .......................................................................................... 42 4.4 Kansas City Southern Railway 44 4.4.1 KSCR’s Main Corridor in Kansas ............................................................................... 45 4.5 Norfolk Southern Railroad Company 47 4.6 Union Pacific Railroad 47 4.6.1 UP’s Main Corridors in Kansas ................................................................................... 48 4.3.2 UP’s Stations in Kansas ............................................................................................... 49 4.7 Summary of Class III Railroad Service in Kansas 52 4.8 Short Line Railroads in Kansas 53 4.8.1 Blackwell Northern Gateway Railroad Co. ................................................................. 53 4.8.2 Blue Rapids Railroad ................................................................................................... 55 4.8.3 Boothill and Western Railway ..................................................................................... 57 4.8.4 Cimarron Valley Railroad ............................................................................................ 58 4.8.5 Garden City Western Railway, Inc. ............................................................................. 60 4.8.6 Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad ................................................................................... 62 4.8.7 Kyle Railroad Company .............................................................................................. 64 4.8.8 Missouri and Northern Arkansas Railroad .................................................................. 67 4.8.9 Nebraska, Kansas, Colorado Railway, Inc. .................................................................. 68 4.8.10 South Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad....................................................................... 70 4.8.11 V&S Railway LLC .................................................................................................... 72 4.8.12 Kansas City Terminal Railway Company .................................................................. 74 4.8.13 New Century AirCenter Railroad/JCAX ................................................................... 75 4.8.14 Wichita Terminal Association Railroad, Inc.............................................................. 76 4.9 Tourist Railroads in Kansas 79 4.9.1 Abilene and Smoky Valley Railroad ........................................................................... 79 4.9.2 Central Branch Railroad .............................................................................................. 81 4.9.3 Midland Railway .......................................................................................................... 82 4.10 Abandoned or Discontinued Rail Lines 84 4.10.1 Abandoned Rail Lines in Kansas ............................................................................... 84 4.10.2 Rail Lines Preserved for Future Use .......................................................................... 86 Chapter 5 – Kansas Rail Traffic Profile .............................................................. 87 5.1 Freight Rail Commodity Profile 87 5.1.1 Freight Rail Traffic Densities ...................................................................................... 88 5.1.2 Interstate Outbound ...................................................................................................... 90 5.1.3 Interstate Inbound ........................................................................................................ 92 5.1.4 Intrastate in Kansas ...................................................................................................... 93 5.1.5 Through Traffic ............................................................................................................ 94 5.2 Freight Rail Geographic Profile 96 5.2.1 Destinations of Outbound Freight Originated in Kansas ............................................. 96 5.2.2 Origins of Inbound Freight Destined for Kansas ......................................................... 97 5.2.3 Origins and Destinations of Through Traffic ............................................................... 98 5.3 Freight Rail Trends 99 Final Report 2 Kansas State Rail Plan 5.3.1 Inbound and Outbound Trends .................................................................................. 100 5.4 Freight Flow Forecasts for 2030 101 5.4.1 Tonnage Forecast ....................................................................................................... 101 5.4.2 Commodity Forecast .................................................................................................. 103 Chapter 6 – Role of the Kansas Rail System in Multimodal Transportation 105 6.1 Kansas’ Role in U.S. Freight Transportation Logistics 105 6.2 Rail Intermodal Development in Kansas 106 6.3 International Freight Transportation Logistics 107 6.3.1 Impacts of the Panama Canal Expansion ................................................................... 108 6.3.2 The Suez Canal Option .............................................................................................. 109 6.4 Intermodal Freight Rail Growth in Kansas 109 6.4.1 Intermodal Equipment Availability for Kansas Agricultural Use ............................. 110 6.4.2 Existing Rail Intermodal Clearances in Kansas ......................................................... 111 6.4.3 Non-Containerized Truck-Rail Facilities in Kansas .................................................. 111 6.5 Rail/Water Bulk Transfer Terminals in Kansas 114 Chapter 7 – Impacts of Rail Transportation in Kansas ...................................116 7.1 Economic Impacts 116 7.1.1 Rail Employment in Kansas ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks
    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Fe Railway Collection – L.M
    Santa Fe Railway Collection – L.M. HURLEY MANUSCRIPTS L. M. (Mike) HURLEY MANUSCRIPTS COLLECTION The Hurley Manuscripts Collection contains paper materials collected by Mike Hurley. He filed the documents in categories in a four-drawer filing cabinet. The filing cabinet is located in the southwest portion of the Archives within the area dedicated to the various collections which comprise the Santa Fe Railway Collection. The numbering system is Hurley’s. The document categories are: Amtrak and busses; baggage checks; blotters/calendars; books; classification cards; Consists of trains; correspondence of Claude Cravens; Date Nail List; depots; Dispatcher’s Sheet; Engines; Engine 1880 (in Military Park in Newton, KS); Foreign Lines; Harvey House and Dining Cars; Cyrus K. Holliday; I.D. Cards; Line Up and Progies; Lt. Wt.; Magazines; Manuscripts (Inventory of Santa Fe Records at the KHS Topeka, KS); Maps; Mergers; Morse Code; Newton History; Northern Pacific; Oil Lamps; Orders-Train; Passenger Schedules; Passes-Train; Pay Roll; Poems (Railroad); Railroad History; R.P.O.; Research Data; Retirees; Roundhouse; RX. Tower Movement; Seniority Roster; Railroad Slang; Street Cars and A.V.I. Ry; Strike; Telegrams and Line Ups; Tickets; Time Service Department; Track Warrants; Trade Marks; Union Pacific #844 and “City of Wichita”; Water Tower; Work Train Reports; and, Wrecks. FILE DRAWER 5: A-E Amtrak and Busses 1. Amtrak Tickets 25 May 1989 2. Amtrak News Article Topeka Daily Capital-Journal May 12, 1985 321. “All Aboard for Amtrak’s 20th Birthday Rocky Mountain News April 30, 1991 332. “Trains, A Part of Dodge City History, Threaten to Fade Away” Dodge City Daily Globe February 9, 1979 342.
    [Show full text]
  • Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 Lb (129,844 Kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas
    Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 ▪ FINAL REPORT▪ August 2017 Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D. Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D. Lisa Shofstall Kansas State University Transportation Center 1 Report No. 2 Government Accession No. 3 Recipient Catalog No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 4 Title and Subtitle 5 Report Date Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) August 2017 Railcar Operational Status in Kansas 6 Performing Organization Code 7 Author(s) 7 Performing Organization Report Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D., Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D., Lisa Shofstall No. 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Kansas State University Transportation Center Department of Civil Engineering 11 Contract or Grant No. 2109 Fiedler Hall C2069 Manhattan, Kansas 66506 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Period Kansas Department of Transportation Covered Bureau of Research Final Report 2300 SW Van Buren October 2015–December 2016 Topeka, Kansas 66611-1195 14 Sponsoring Agency Code RE-0691-01 15 Supplementary Notes For more information write to address in block 9. The rail industry’s recent shift towards larger and heavier railcars has influenced Class III/short line railroad operation and track maintenance costs. Class III railroads earn less than $38.1 million in annual revenue and generally operate first and last leg shipping for their customers. In Kansas, Class III railroads operate approximately 40 percent of the roughly 2,800 miles (4,500 km) of rail; however, due to the current Class III track condition, they move lighter railcars at lower speeds than Class I railroads.
    [Show full text]
  • How Tomorrow Moves: CSX and the Port of Virginia Challenge: Significant Freight Growth Projected
    How Tomorrow Moves: CSX and the Port of Virginia Challenge: Significant Freight Growth Projected Virginia Commonwealth Population In millions 9.8 MILLION 8.0 7.1 MORE x 40 TONS 108 TONS Annual freight demand = per person Annual commonwealth freight demand increase from 2010- 2030 2000 2010 2030 Pollution Road & Rail Congestion Logistics Cost Figures according to the Federal Railroad Administration and the US Census Bureau. 222222 Challenge: Shifts in Global Trade are Driving Intermodal Flow to the East Coast Hampton Roads Suez Panama Canal Canal 333333 Challenge: Virginia, Mid-Atlantic Locked Out of CSX Double-Stack Freight Network Double-stacked trains can deliver more freight with fewer trains, dramatically increasing NW Ohio Boston efficiency while reducing rail Chicago Chambersburg line and highway congestion New York Baltimore CSX intermodal traffic to and St. Louis Hampton Roads from Hampton Roads largely limited to single-stack trains Charlotte due to clearance restrictions Memphis Wilmington Current CSX Double Stack Routes New Orleans Florida 444444 National Gateway: Meeting the Challenges 61 clearance projects and 6 new and enhanced terminals, Pittsburgh utilizing the latest technology, in NW Ohio (planned) Boston 6 states and DC Chicago Chambersburg New York Connects Virginia and the Port Baltimore to markets in the Midwest and St. Louis Columbus Southeast, opening new (planned) Baltimore Hampton Roads (planned) demand centers Charlotte (planned Memphis expansion) Wilmington New Orleans Florida 555555 Northwest Ohio Creates ‘Hub & Spoke’ Network Market(s) Benefits Near Term Service increase from 3 Cincinnati to 5 times weekly; reduction in transit time Boston Columbus Service increase from 3 Detroit to 5 times weekly NW Ohio Chambersburg New York Toledo New service Chicago Baltimore Evansville Enhanced service Long Term St.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I National Gateway Clearance Initiative Documentation
    Lead Agencies: Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation Cooperating Agencies: Phase I National Gateway Clearance Initiative epartment of Transportation Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C) September 7, 2010 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation West Virginia Department of Transportation Table of Contents 1. Summary 1 1.1 History of the Initiative 1 1.2 Logical Termini 7 1.3 Need and Purpose 9 1.4 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation 11 1.5 Agency Coordination and Public Involvement 18 1.5.1 Agency Coordination 18 1.5.2 Public Involvement 21 2. Need and Purpose of the Action 22 3. Context of the Action and Development of Alternatives 25 3.1 Overview 25 3.1.1 No Build Alternative 25 3.1.2 Proposed Action 26 3.2 Bridge Removal 26 3.3 Bridge Raising 27 3.4 Bridge Modification 27 3.5 Tunnel Liner Modification 28 3.6 Tunnel Open Cut 28 3.7 Excess Material Disposal 29 3.8 Grade Adjustment 29 3.9 Grade Crossing Closures/Modifications 30 3.10 Other Aspects 30 3.10.1 Interlocking 30 3.10.2 Modal Hubs 30 4. Impacts and Mitigation 31 4.1 Corridor-Wide Impacts 31 i Table of Contents 4.1.1 Right-of-Way 31 4.1.2 Community and Socio-Economic 31 4.1.2.1 Community Cohesion 31 4.1.2.2 Employment Opportunity 31 4.1.2.3 Environmental Justice 34 4.1.2.4 Public Health and Safety 35 4.1.3 Traffic 36 4.1.3.1 Maintenance of Traffic 36 4.1.3.2 Congestion Reduction 37 4.1.4 General Conformity Analysis 37 4.1.4.1 Regulatory Background 37 4.1.4.2 Evaluation 39 4.1.4.3 Construction Emissions 40 4.1.4.4 Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Freight Plan
    Chapter 3 – Missouri Freight System Chapter 3 – Missouri Freight System KEY POINTS One of the key products of this Missouri State Freight Plan is a defined Missouri freight network. This is the first time Missouri has had a defined freight network. That is important for several reasons, chief among those: a proposed improvement project must be located on or adjacent to the defined freight network to be considered in the freight prioritization process. The top 100 freight generators in Missouri were identified based on truck activity. This information helped support the identification of the freight network and shaped the prioritization process. Freight and commodity flows underscore the role Missouri plays as a bridge state for the nation, as most freight travels through our state instead of starting or ending here. Introduction Missouri is at the freight crossroads of America. As the geographic and demographic center of population for the United States, Missouri is well positioned as the country’s freight nexus. Missouri’s freight system is a network of highway, rail, air, water, pipeline, intermodal facilities, and freight generators that together move goods and commodities. The freight system is how Missouri products like soybeans and aviation parts are transported around the world. An understanding of the key features of the Missouri Freight Network is integral to understanding the strategies and future goals outlined in this Missouri State Freight Plan. The freight system offers a range of service options. The best freight service for a particular shipment depends on the shipment weight, shipment value, the origin and destination, when the product is needed, security and safety, transportation costs, and customer needs.
    [Show full text]
  • & International Trade Guide
    2017 HAMPTON ROADS MARITIME & International Trade Guide INSIDE: A caffeine buzz in Suffolk The future of offshore wind Newport News Shipbuilding to hire 3,000 more workers A new classPort prepares for bigger ships and more cargo Permit No. 516 No. Permit Richmond, VA Richmond, PAID US Postage US PRSRT STD PRSRT Change Service Requested Service Change 23219 VA Richmond, 100, Suite Street, Main E. 1207 Get your message to the people who matter most! 2017 Hampton Roads Statistical Digest Place your advertising message in our annual Hampton Roads Statistical Digest. The Digest has a long history as a valuable resource having been published by Virginia Business for over 35 years! Contact: Susan Horton [email protected] 757.625.4233 Get your message to the people who matter WAREHOUSING, TRANSPORTATION, LOGISTICS & FOREIGN TRADE ZONE most! Givens offers a Weekly Summary Entry Program that saves our Foreign Trade Zone 2017 Hampton Roads customers thousands of dollars per year in Statistical Digest entry and merchandise processing fees. Under Weekly Summary Entry procedures, the zone user files only one Customs Entry per week, rather than filing one Customs Entry per shipment. Customs no longer has to process an entry for each and every shipment being imported into the zone, and the Givens Foreign Trade Place your advertising message in Zone customer no longer has to pay for the our annual Hampton Roads processing of each and every entry. Statistical Digest. The Digest has a long history as a valuable We welcome the opportunity to show you resource having been published by Virginia Business for over how this program can also be a source of 35 years! significant new savings for you.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Plan 2005 - 2006
    Kansas Department of Transportation Rail Plan 2005 - 2006 Kathleen Sebelius, Governor Debra L. Miller, Secretary of Transportation Kansas Department of Transportation Division of Planning and Development Bureau of Transportation Planning – Office of Rail Affairs Kansas Rail Plan Update 2005 - 2006 Kansas Department of Transportation Division of Planning and Development Bureau of Transportation Planning Office of Rail Affairs Dwight D. Eisenhower State Office Building 700 SW Harrison Street, Second Floor Tower Topeka, Kansas 66603-3754 Telephone: (785) 296-3841 Fax: (785) 296-0963 Debra L. Miller, Secretary of Transportation Terry Heidner, Division of Planning and Development Director Chris Herrick, Chief of Transportation Planning Bureau John Jay Rosacker, Assistant Chief Transportation Planning Bureau ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Prepared by CONTRIBUTORS Office of Rail Affairs Staff John W. Maddox, CPM, Rail Affairs Program Manager Darlene K. Osterhaus, Rail Affairs Research Analyst Edward Dawson, Rail Affairs Research Analyst Paul Ahlenius, P.E., Rail Affairs Engineer Bureau of Transportation Planning Staff John Jay Rosacker, Assistant Chief Transportation Planning Bureau Carl Gile, Decision Mapping Technician Specialist OFFICE OF RAIL AFFAIRS WEB SITE http://www.ksdot.org/burRail/Rail/default.asp Pictures provided by railroads or taken by Office of Rail Affairs staff Railroad data and statistics provided by railroads 1 Executive Summary The Kansas Rail Plan Update 2005 - 2006 has Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1654 et seg). Financial been prepared in accordance with requirements of the assistance in the form of Federal Rail Administration Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) U.S. Department (FRA) grants has been used to fund rehabilitation of Transportation (USDOT), as set forth in federal projects throughout Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Keith T. Borman Vice President and General Counsel American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association 50 F Street NW, Suite 7020 Washington, DC 20001
    U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE of Transportation Washington, DC 20590 Federal Railroad Administration AUG 2 9 2018 Mr. Keith T. Borman Vice President and General Counsel American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association 50 F Street NW, Suite 7020 Washington, DC 20001 Re: Docket Number FRA-2009-0078 Dear Mr. Borman: This letter is in response to the American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association's (ASLRRA) August 7. 2018, petition to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). ASLRRA requested that FRA expand the regulatory relief granted in Docket Number FRA-2009-0078 to include two additional ASLRRA member railroads as parties to the waiver. The ASLRRA member railroads that seek to become parties to the subject waiver are the Regional Rail — Tyburn Railroad L.L.C. and the South Plains Lamesa Railroad, Ltd. The existing waiver provides ASLRRA member railroads relief from the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 21103(a)(4), which, in part, requires a train employee to receive 48 hours off-duty after initiating an on-duty period, each day, for 6 consecutive days. The existing waiver allows employees, working for railroads that are subject to the waiver, to receive 24 hours off-duty after initiating an on-duty period, each day, for 6 consecutive days. FRA notes that ASLRRA expressed in its request that the two above-referenced railroads sought employee input concerning the waiver request, and that the affected employees at each railroad support the waiver. ASLRRA also expressed that employee input concerning the waiver had been documented and will be made available to FRA upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona State Rail Plan March 2011
    Arizona State Rail Plan March 2011 Arizona Department of Transportation This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements The State Rail Plan was made possible by the cooperative efforts of the following individuals and organizations who contributed significantly to the successful completion of the project: Rail Technical Advisory Team Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Chris Watson, Arizona Corporation Commission Bonnie Allin, Tucson Airport Authority Reuben Teran, Arizona Game and Fish Department Zoe Richmond, Union Pacific Railroad David Jacobs, Arizona State Historic Preservation Office Jane Morris, City of Phoenix – Sky Harbor Airport Gordon Taylor, Arizona State Land Department Patrick Loftus, TTX Company Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Angela Mogel, Bureau of Land Management ADOT Project Team Jack Tomasik, Central Arizona Association of Governments Sara Allred, Project Manager Paul Johnson, City of Yuma Kristen Keener Busby, Sustainability Program Manager Jermaine Hannon, Federal Highway Administration John Halikowski, Director Katai Nakosha, Governor’s Office John McGee, Executive Director for Planning and Policy James Chessum, Greater Yuma Port Authority Mike Normand, Director of Transit Programs Kevin Wallace, Maricopa Association of Governments Shannon Scutari, Esq. Director, Rail & Sustainability Marc Pearsall, Maricopa Association of Governments Services Gabe Thum, Pima Association of Governments Jennifer Toth, Director, Multi-Modal Planning Division Robert Bohannan, RH Bohannan & Associates Robert Travis, State Railroad Liaison Jay
    [Show full text]