DOCSLIB.ORG

CENTRIFUGAL FORCE Case 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CENTRIFUGAL FORCE Case 1 CENTRIFUGAL FORCE Case 1 Fwall FCentrifugal 2 Fwall = FCentipetal = mv /R Consider the following situation. A small block (blue) is up against the wall of a rotating platform. This situation is viewed by two observers: one (green) who is on the rotating platform and one (purple) not on the rotating platform. The green observer is in a non‐inertial (accelerated) reference frame and the purple observer is in an inertial (non‐accelerating) reference frame (the Earth!). The green observer notices that if the block is moved away from the wall, it slides back to the wall, and concludes that the block must be in equilibrium (a = 0) under the action of an outward centrifugal force and the inward force the wall exerts on it. This is faulty reasoning resulting from the fact that the green observer is in a rotating reference frame. The purple observer (non‐accelerating) correctly concludes that the block is certainly not in equilibrium because it is moving in a circle and finds that the centripetal force that causes the block to move in a circle is provided by the inward force of the wall. Case 2 R Observer on the ground object observer Centrifugal force is a fictitious (i.e., not real) force perceived to act on objects by an observer in an accelerated (i.e., non‐inertial) reference frame. In this example, a car is driving along a straight road with a constant speed v and enters a turn having a radius of curvature R. The driver (observer) maintains constant speed in the turn, but since the turn is ¼ of a circular, the car and the driver undergo a centripetal acceleration. The centripetal acceleration of the car is provided by the friction force on the tires by the road. The centripetal acceleration of the driver is provided by his seat belt. Suppose there is some object resting on the dashboard of the car. As the car drives through the curve, the driver notices that the object appeared to move to the extreme right side of the dashboard and concludes that there must have been an outward force – a centrifugal force that acted radially outward and pushed the object to the right side. The driver is a non‐inertial observer and invents this fictitious centrifugal force to explain the apparent motion of the object. He also concludes that the object is in equilibrium under the opposing centrifugal force and the force that the side of the car exerts on it. The observer on the ground is in an inertial reference frame (the earth) and concludes the following. The object, by virtue of its inertia, resists changes in it velocity. To make the turn with the car, some force (real) must be acting to produce the centripetal acceleration required to make it move in a circular path. The only force available for this purpose would be the friction force between it and the dashboard. This friction force must be insufficient to accomplish this and thus the object continues moving in a straight line as any undisturbed object would. So in effect the car slid out from under the object, and the object ends up against the right side of the car which does exert a real force on the object. It is the lack of a centripetal force that causes the driver to conclude incorrectly that an outward force acted on the object. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PHYSICS of ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY Angie Bukley1, William Paloski,2 and Gilles Clément1,3
    Chapter 2 PHYSICS OF ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY Angie Bukley1, William Paloski,2 and Gilles Clément1,3 1 Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA 2 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA 3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France This chapter discusses potential technologies for achieving artificial gravity in a space vehicle. We begin with a series of definitions and a general description of the rotational dynamics behind the forces ultimately exerted on the human body during centrifugation, such as gravity level, gravity gradient, and Coriolis force. Human factors considerations and comfort limits associated with a rotating environment are then discussed. Finally, engineering options for designing space vehicles with artificial gravity are presented. Figure 2-01. Artist's concept of one of NASA early (1962) concepts for a manned space station with artificial gravity: a self- inflating 22-m-diameter rotating hexagon. Photo courtesy of NASA. 1 ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY: WHAT IS IT? 1.1 Definition Artificial gravity is defined in this book as the simulation of gravitational forces aboard a space vehicle in free fall (in orbit) or in transit to another planet. Throughout this book, the term artificial gravity is reserved for a spinning spacecraft or a centrifuge within the spacecraft such that a gravity-like force results. One should understand that artificial gravity is not gravity at all. Rather, it is an inertial force that is indistinguishable from normal gravity experience on Earth in terms of its action on any mass. A centrifugal force proportional to the mass that is being accelerated centripetally in a rotating device is experienced rather than a gravitational pull.
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURES 20 - 29 INTRODUCTION to CLASSICAL MECHANICS Prof
    LECTURES 20 - 29 INTRODUCTION TO CLASSICAL MECHANICS Prof. N. Harnew University of Oxford HT 2017 1 OUTLINE : INTRODUCTION TO MECHANICS LECTURES 20-29 20.1 The hyperbolic orbit 20.2 Hyperbolic orbit : the distance of closest approach 20.3 Hyperbolic orbit: the angle of deflection, φ 20.3.1 Method 1 : using impulse 20.3.2 Method 2 : using hyperbola orbit parameters 20.4 Hyperbolic orbit : Rutherford scattering 21.1 NII for system of particles - translation motion 21.1.1 Kinetic energy and the CM 21.2 NII for system of particles - rotational motion 21.2.1 Angular momentum and the CM 21.3 Introduction to Moment of Inertia 21.3.1 Extend the example : J not parallel to ! 21.3.2 Moment of inertia : mass not distributed in a plane 21.3.3 Generalize for rigid bodies 22.1 Moment of inertia tensor 2 22.1.1 Rotation about a principal axis 22.2 Moment of inertia & energy of rotation 22.3 Calculation of moments of inertia 22.3.1 MoI of a thin rectangular plate 22.3.2 MoI of a thin disk perpendicular to plane of disk 22.3.3 MoI of a solid sphere 23.1 Parallel axis theorem 23.1.1 Example : compound pendulum 23.2 Perpendicular axis theorem 23.2.1 Perpendicular axis theorem : example 23.3 Example 1 : solid ball rolling down slope 23.4 Example 2 : where to hit a ball with a cricket bat 23.5 Example 3 : an aircraft landing 24.1 Lagrangian mechanics : Introduction 24.2 Introductory example : the energy method for the E of M 24.3 Becoming familiar with the jargon 24.3.1 Generalised coordinates 24.3.2 Degrees of Freedom 24.3.3 Constraints 3 24.3.4 Configuration
    [Show full text]
  • Centripetal Force Is Balanced by the Circular Motion of the Elctron Causing the Centrifugal Force
    STANDARD SC1 b. Construct an argument to support the claim that the proton (and not the neutron or electron) defines the element’s identity. c. Construct an explanation based on scientific evidence of the production of elements heavier than hydrogen by nuclear fusion. d. Construct an explanation that relates the relative abundance of isotopes of a particular element to the atomic mass of the element. First, we quickly review pre-requisite concepts One of the most curious observations with atoms is the fact that there are charged particles inside the atom and there is also constant spinning and Warm-up 1: List the name, charge, mass, and location of the three subatomic circling. How does atom remain stable under these conditions? Remember particles Opposite charges attract each other; Like charges repel each other. Your Particle Location Charge Mass in a.m.u. Task: Read the following information and consult with your teacher as STABILITY OF ATOMS needed, answer Warm-Up tasks 2 and 3 on Page 2. (3) Death spiral does not occur at all! This is because the centripetal force is balanced by the circular motion of the elctron causing the centrifugal force. The centrifugal force is the outward force from the center to the circumference of the circle. Electrons not only spin on their own axis, they are also in a constant circular motion around the nucleus. Despite this terrific movement, electrons are very stable. The stability of electrons mainly comes from the electrostatic forces of attraction between the nucleus and the electrons. The electrostatic forces are also known as Coulombic Forces of Attraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Inertial, Centrifugal, and Centripetal Forces and Motions The
    Measuring Inertial, Centrifugal, and Centripetal Forces and Motions Many people are quite confused about the true nature and dynamics of cen- trifugal and centripetal forces. Some believe that centrifugal force is a fictitious radial force that can’t be measured. Others claim it is a real force equal and opposite to measured centripetal force. It is sometimes thought to be a continu- ous positive acceleration like centripetal force. Crackpot theorists ignore all measurements and claim the centrifugal force comes out of the aether or spa- cetime continuum surrounding a spinning body. The true reality of centripetal and centrifugal forces can be easily determined by simply measuring them with accelerometers rather than by imagining metaphysical assumptions. The Momentum and Energy of the Cannon versus a Cannonball Cannon Ball vs Cannon Momentum and Energy Force = mass x acceleration ma = Momentum = mv m = 100 kg m = 1 kg v = p/m = 1 m/s v = p/m = 100 m/s p = mv 100 p = mv = 100 energy = mv2/2 = 50 J energy = mv2/2 = 5,000 J Force p = mv = p = mv p=100 Momentum p = 100 Energy mv2/2 = mv2 = mv2/2 Cannon ball has the same A Force always produces two momentum as the cannon equal momenta but it almost but has 100 times more never produces two equal kinetic energy. quantities of kinetic energy. In the following thought experiment with a cannon and golden cannon ball, their individual momentum is easy to calculate because they are always equal. However, the recoil energy from the force of the gunpowder is much greater for the ball than the cannon.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Principle for Hydrodynamics and Thermodynamics, Including General, Rotational Flows
    th December 15, 2014 Action Principle for Hydrodynamics and Thermodynamics, including general, rotational flows C. Fronsdal Depart. of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles 90095-1547 USA ABSTRACT This paper presents an action principle for hydrodynamics and thermodynamics that includes general, rotational flows, thus responding to a challenge that is more that 100 years old. It has been lifted to the relativistic context and it can be used to provide a suitable source of rotating matter for Einstein’s equation, finally overcoming another challenge of long standing, the problem presented by the Bianchi identity. The new theory is a combination of Eulerian and Lagrangian hydrodynamics, with an extension to thermodynamics. In the first place it is an action principle for adia- batic systems, including the usual conservation laws as well as the Gibbsean variational principle. But it also provides a framework within which dissipation can be introduced in the usual way, by adding a viscosity term to the momentum equation, one of the Euler-Lagrange equations. The rate of the resulting energy dissipation is determined by the equations of motion. It is an ideal framework for the description of quasi-static processes. It is a major development of the Navier-Stokes-Fourier approach, the princi- pal advantage being a hamiltonian structure with a natural concept of energy as a first integral of the motion. Two velocity fields are needed, one the gradient of a scalar potential, the other the time derivative of a vector field (vector potential). Variation of the scalar potential gives the equation of continuity and variation of the vector potential yields the momentum equation.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Non-Inertial Frames
    6. Non-Inertial Frames We stated, long ago, that inertial frames provide the setting for Newtonian mechanics. But what if you, one day, find yourself in a frame that is not inertial? For example, suppose that every 24 hours you happen to spin around an axis which is 2500 miles away. What would you feel? Or what if every year you spin around an axis 36 million miles away? Would that have any e↵ect on your everyday life? In this section we will discuss what Newton’s equations of motion look like in non- inertial frames. Just as there are many ways that an animal can be not a dog, so there are many ways in which a reference frame can be non-inertial. Here we will just consider one type: reference frames that rotate. We’ll start with some basic concepts. 6.1 Rotating Frames Let’s start with the inertial frame S drawn in the figure z=z with coordinate axes x, y and z.Ourgoalistounderstand the motion of particles as seen in a non-inertial frame S0, with axes x , y and z , which is rotating with respect to S. 0 0 0 y y We’ll denote the angle between the x-axis of S and the x0- axis of S as ✓.SinceS is rotating, we clearly have ✓ = ✓(t) x 0 0 θ and ✓˙ =0. 6 x Our first task is to find a way to describe the rotation of Figure 31: the axes. For this, we can use the angular velocity vector ! that we introduced in the last section to describe the motion of particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Circular Motion
    Uniform Circular Motion Part I. The Centripetal Impulse The “centripetal impulse” was Sir Isaac Newton’ favorite force. The Polygon Approximation. Newton made a business of analyzing the motion of bodies in circular orbits, or on any curved path, as motion on a polygon. Straight lines are easier to handle than circular arcs. The following pictures show how an inscribed or circumscribed polygon approximates a circular path. The approximation gets better as the number of sides of the polygon increases. To keep a body moving along a circular path at constant speed, a force of constant magnitude that is always directed toward the center of the circle must be applied to the body at all times. To keep the body moving on a polygon at constant speed, a sequence of impulses (quick hits), each directed toward the center, must be applied to the body only at those points on the path where there is a bend in the straight- line motion. The force Fc causing uniform circular motion and the force Fp causing uniform polygonal motion are both centripetal forces: “center seeking” forces that change the direction of the velocity but not its magnitude. A graph of the magnitudes of Fc and Fp as a function of time would look as follows: Force F p causing Polygon Motion Force Force F c causing Circular Motion time In essence, Fp is the “digital version ” of Fc . Imagine applying an “on-off force” to a ball rolling on the table − one hit every nanosecond – in a direction perpendicular to the motion. By moving around one billion small bends (polygon corners) per second, the ball will appear to move on perfect circle.
    [Show full text]
  • Centripetal Force Purpose: in This Lab We Will Study the Relationship
    Centripetal Force Purpose: In this lab we will study the relationship between acceleration of an object moving with uniform circular motion and the force required to produce that acceleration. Introduction: An object moving in a circle with constant tangential speed is said to be executing uniform circular motion. This results from having a net force directed toward the center of the circular path. This net force, the centripetal force, gives rise to a centripetal acceleration toward the center of the circular path, and this changes the direction of the motion of the object continuously to make the circular path possible. The equation which governs rotational dynamics is Fc = mac, where Fc is the centripetal force, ac is the centripetal acceleration, and m is the mass of the object. This is nothing but Newton's second law in the v2 radial direction! From rotational kinematics we can show that ac= r , where v is the tangential speed and mv2 r is the radius of the circular path. By combining the two equations, we get Fc = r . The period T of circular motion is the time it takes for the object to make one complete revolution. The tangential speed v of 2πr the object is v = T , which is the distance traveled divided by the time elapsed (i.e. circumference/period). Thus we finally get: 4π2mr F = c T 2 In this laboratory session we will keep the centripetal force Fc and the mass m constant and vary the radius r. We will investigate how the period T need be adjusted as the radius r is changed.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 the Equations of Fluid Motion
    Chapter 6 The equations of fluid motion In order to proceed further with our discussion of the circulation of the at- mosphere, and later the ocean, we must develop some of the underlying theory governing the motion of a fluid on the spinning Earth. A differen- tially heated, stratified fluid on a rotating planet cannot move in arbitrary paths. Indeed, there are strong constraints on its motion imparted by the angular momentum of the spinning Earth. These constraints are profoundly important in shaping the pattern of atmosphere and ocean circulation and their ability to transport properties around the globe. The laws governing the evolution of both fluids are the same and so our theoretical discussion willnotbespecifictoeitheratmosphereorocean,butcanandwillbeapplied to both. Because the properties of rotating fluids are often counter-intuitive and sometimes difficult to grasp, alongside our theoretical development we will describe and carry out laboratory experiments with a tank of water on a rotating table (Fig.6.1). Many of the laboratory experiments we make use of are simplified versions of ‘classics’ that have become cornerstones of geo- physical fluid dynamics. They are listed in Appendix 13.4. Furthermore we have chosen relatively simple experiments that, in the main, do nor require sophisticated apparatus. We encourage you to ‘have a go’ or view the atten- dant movie loops that record the experiments carried out in preparation of our text. We now begin a more formal development of the equations that govern the evolution of a fluid. A brief summary of the associated mathematical concepts, definitions and notation we employ can be found in an Appendix 13.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13: the Conditions of Rotary Motion
    Chapter 13 Conditions of Rotary Motion KINESIOLOGY Scientific Basis of Human Motion, 11 th edition Hamilton, Weimar & Luttgens Presentation Created by TK Koesterer, Ph.D., ATC Humboldt State University Revised by Hamilton & Weimar REVISED FOR FYS by J. Wunderlich, Ph.D. Agenda 1. Eccentric Force àTorque (“Moment”) 2. Lever 3. Force Couple 4. Conservation of Angular Momentum 5. Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces ROTARY FORCE (“Eccentric Force”) § Force not in line with object’s center of gravity § Rotary and translatory motion can occur Fig 13.2 Torque (“Moment”) T = F x d F Moment T = F x d Arm F d = 0.3 cos (90-45) Fig 13.3 T = F x d Moment Arm Torque changed by changing length of moment d arm W T = F x d d W Fig 13.4 Sum of Torques (“Moments”) T = F x d Fig 13.8 Sum of Torques (“Moments”) T = F x d § Sum of torques = 0 • A balanced seesaw • Linear motion if equal parallel forces overcome resistance • Rowers Force Couple T = F x d § Effect of equal parallel forces acting in opposite direction Fig 13.6 & 13.7 LEVER § “A rigid bar that can rotate about a fixed point when a force is applied to overcome a resistance” § Used to: – Balance forces – Favor force production – Favor speed and range of motion – Change direction of applied force External Levers § Small force to overcome large resistance § Crowbar § Large Range Of Motion to overcome small resistance § Hitting golf ball § Balance force (load) § Seesaw Anatomical Levers § Nearly every bone is a lever § The joint is fulcrum § Contracting muscles are force § Don’t necessarily resemble
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8: Rotational Motion
    TODAY: Start Chapter 8 on Rotation Chapter 8: Rotational Motion Linear speed: distance traveled per unit of time. In rotational motion we have linear speed: depends where we (or an object) is located in the circle. If you ride near the outside of a merry-go-round, do you go faster or slower than if you ride near the middle? It depends on whether “faster” means -a faster linear speed (= speed), ie more distance covered per second, Or - a faster rotational speed (=angular speed, ω), i.e. more rotations or revolutions per second. • Linear speed of a rotating object is greater on the outside, further from the axis (center) Perimeter of a circle=2r •Rotational speed is the same for any point on the object – all parts make the same # of rotations in the same time interval. More on rotational vs tangential speed For motion in a circle, linear speed is often called tangential speed – The faster the ω, the faster the v in the same way v ~ ω. directly proportional to − ω doesn’t depend on where you are on the circle, but v does: v ~ r He’s got twice the linear speed than this guy. Same RPM (ω) for all these people, but different tangential speeds. Clicker Question A carnival has a Ferris wheel where the seats are located halfway between the center and outside rim. Compared with a Ferris wheel with seats on the outside rim, your angular speed while riding on this Ferris wheel would be A) more and your tangential speed less. B) the same and your tangential speed less.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Physics Rotational Motion
    Conceptual Physics Rotational Motion Lana Sheridan De Anza College July 17, 2017 Last time • energy sources discussion • collisions (elastic) Overview • inelastic collisions • circular motion and rotation • centripetal force • fictitious forces • torque • moment of inertia • center of mass • angular momentum Inelastic collisions are collisions in which energy is lost as sound, heat, or in deformations of the colliding objects. When the colliding objects stick together afterwards the collision is perfectly inelastic. Types of Collision There are two different types of collisions: Elastic collisions are collisions in which none of the kinetic energy of the colliding objects is lost. (Ki = Kf ) When the colliding objects stick together afterwards the collision is perfectly inelastic. Types of Collision There are two different types of collisions: Elastic collisions are collisions in which none of the kinetic energy of the colliding objects is lost. (Ki = Kf ) Inelastic collisions are collisions in which energy is lost as sound, heat, or in deformations of the colliding objects. Types of Collision There are two different types of collisions: Elastic collisions are collisions in which none of the kinetic energy of the colliding objects is lost. (Ki = Kf ) Inelastic collisions are collisions in which energy is lost as sound, heat, or in deformations of the colliding objects. When the colliding objects stick together afterwards the collision is perfectly inelastic. Inelastic Collisions For general inelastic collisions, some kinetic energy is lost. But we can still use the conservation of momentum: pi = pf 9.4 Collisions in One Dimension 257 In contrast, the total kinetic energy of the system of particles may or may not be con- served, depending on the type of collision.
    [Show full text]