Second Progress Report on the German Strategy for Adaptation to Climate Change (DAS)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Second Progress Report on the German Strategy for Adaptation to Climate Change (DAS) Second Progress Report on the German Strategy for Adaptation to Climate Change (DAS) CONTENTS A. The German Adaptation Strategy (DAS): objectives, principles and processes ............................... 4 A.1. The DAS: principles and objectives ................................................................................................................. 4 A.2. The DAS reporting cycle ................................................................................................................................. 5 A.3. The DAS, APA and Progress Report in review ................................................................................................. 8 A.4. European Union and international integration ............................................................................................ 11 B. Current findings and results ........................................................................................................ 13 B.1. Monitoring: climatic changes, impacts and adaptation responses ............................................................. 13 B.2. Vulnerability assessment ............................................................................................................................. 18 B.3. APA II implementation and APA III preparation process .............................................................................. 33 B.4. Adaptation measures by other actors .......................................................................................................... 35 B.5. Evaluation of the DAS strategy process ....................................................................................................... 44 C. Conclusions of the Interministerial Working Group on Adaptation to Climate Change ................ 48 C.1. Vision and goals of the DAS process ............................................................................................................ 48 C.2. The enabling environment ........................................................................................................................... 49 C.3. Selecting measures ...................................................................................................................................... 52 C.4. Communication and participation ............................................................................................................... 53 D. Political priorities ........................................................................................................................ 55 Annex 1 Annex 2 2 FIGURES Figure 1: The DAS reporting system. Source: Federal Environment Agency (UBA), authors’ own presentation. ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2: A chronology of the adaptation strategy, action plan and progress report. Source: Federal Environment Agency (UBA), authors’ own presentation. ................................................. 9 Figure 3: Schematic representation of the damage potential of selected climate impacts for the present, by 2030 and by 2030 with building precautions. Source: based on Bubeck et al. (2019) ... 23 Figure 4: Left: the number of hot days (maximum temperature ≥ 30°C) in 2018, right: the anomaly of the number of hot days in Germany by comparison with the reference period of 1961-1990. Source: DWD 2020 .......................................................................................................... 27 Figure 5: Results chain – the effects of climate change on German foreign trade. Source: Peter, Guyer and Füssler (2018). ................................................................................................................. 29 Figure 6: Implemented or planned climate change adaptation measures mentioned most frequently. Source: UBA (2019). ........................................................................................................ 40 Figure 7: Logic model for DAS process evaluation. Source: Kind et al. (2019, p. 12) .................................... 45 3 A. The German Adaptation Strategy (DAS): objectives, principles and processes Climate change is one of the greatest challenges of the 21st century. The effects of climate change can already be felt in Germany and will intensify in future. Between 1881 and 2019, the average air temperature in Germany rose by 1.6˚ Celsius. Climate change has serious adverse impacts on the health and prosperity of people living in Germany. Heatwaves, flooding and heavy rainfall events, etc. cause premature deaths, as well as damage to agriculture and forestry, buildings and infrastructure, and industry and the economy; climate change can also trigger dynamic adaptation processes in ecosystems, such as the displacement of plant and animal species. Timely and far-sighted adaptation to the impacts of climate change is becoming increasingly important in order to minimise these risks and damage and avoid higher remedial and adapta- tion costs in future. In response to the challenges posed by climate change, the federal government has adopted the German Strategy for Adaptation to Climate Change (DAS). The aim is to ensure that the existing objectives in the various sectoral policy fields can be achieved under the new conditions created by climate change. The German Adaptation Strategy provides a policy framework for Germany’s adaptation to climate change and facilitates a cross-sectoral approach by the federal government. In Germany, climate change adaptation is an ongoing long-term task and is addressed within an institutional and methodological framework agreed at political level. Scientific research programmes and processes for participation and consultation have been set up, along with a continuous reporting system. Adaptation to climate change is based on the precautionary principle: the aim is to prevent or minimise damage to people and the environment and build the capacities of state and non-state actors alike to han- dle the impacts of climate change. The coronavirus pandemic, which we have been experiencing globally since early 2020, is an example of the effects of ambitious precautionary policies. The same urgency and necessity prevail in relation to climate change adaptation as well. • The coronavirus pandemic and climate change demonstrate, with increasing clarity, the intercon- nectedness and vulnerability of all spheres of life and the economy in Germany. • It is therefore becoming increasingly important, now and in future, to build resilience to climate impacts and other crises through preparedness over the long term and crisis management in the short term. This enhanced resilience will also contribute to achieving other important objectives that society has set itself, such as global and national sustainable development goals, greenhouse gas neutrality and the halting of biodiversity loss through enhanced protection of nature and the environment. For that reason, it is important to rely on nature-based solutions wherever possible, primarily because they offer great benefits from a precautionary perspective, but also because they safeguard basic, robust health and provisioning services, thus maintaining the functionality of the system as a whole even when individual elements are temporarily unavailable. A.1. The DAS: principles and objectives The long-term objective of the German Strategy for Adaptation to Climate Change (DAS) is to reduce the vulnerability of natural, social and economic systems to the impacts of climate change and to improve the adaptive capacity of these systems and take advantage of any opportunities at the same time. In order to identify action options, 15 fields of action are considered; these are (in alphabetic order): agriculture; bio- 4 logical diversity; the building sector; energy industry; financial services industry and insurance; fishery; for- estry and forest management; human health; soil; tourism; trade and industry; transport and transport infrastructure; water regime; flood management and coastal protection; and cross-sectional topics: spatial, regional and physical development planning, and civil protection and emergency preparedness. The work is supported and approved at federal government level under the auspices of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) within the Interministerial Working Group on Adaptation to Climate Change (IMAA). The IMAA is made up of representatives from nearly all the federal ministries, who coordinate activities and continuously set new goals to establish the conditions for climate change adaptation in Germany. The structures for cooperation have proved their worth. In ad- dition, the Conference of Environment Ministers of the Federation and the Länder (UMK) has established the Standing Committee on Adaptation to Climate Change Impacts (StA AFK) as part of the Federation- Länder Working Group on Climate, Energy, Mobility and Sustainability (BLAG KliNa). The Standing Commit- tee1 is the main coordination mechanism for cooperation with the Länder and is the forum through which strategies and measures adopted by the Land administrations feed into work on the DAS. The following principles, set forth in the DAS, were devised to provide guidance for the further development of the adaptation process and federal government action: • openness and cooperation; • approach based on knowledge, flexibility and the precautionary principle; • subsidiarity, self-provision,
Recommended publications
  • Climate Action Plan Executive Summary
    Climate Action Plan Executive Summary Commission on Climate Change August 2008 Executive Summary climate action plan • 3 Report Overview n April 20, 2007, Governor Martin O’Malley signed Executive Order 01.01.2007.07 (the Order) establishing the Maryland Commission on Climate Change (the Commission). Sixteen State agency heads and six members of the General Assembly comprise the Commission. The principal Ocharge of the Commission is to develop a Plan of Action (the Climate Action Plan) to address the drivers of climate change, to prepare for its likely impacts in Maryland, and to establish goals and timetables for implementation. The Order emphasized Maryland’s particular vulnerability to climate change impacts of sea level rise, increased storm intensity, extreme droughts and heat waves, and increased wind and rainfall events. It recognized that human activities such as coastal development, burning of fossil fuels, and increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are contributing to the causes and consequences of climate change. While noting Maryland’s recent climate initiatives, the Order emphasized that continued leadership by example by Maryland State and local governments is imperative. The Commission is supported by three Working Groups whose members were appointed by the Commission Chair, Shari T. Wilson, Secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE): Scientific and Technical Working Group (STWG), chaired by Donald Boesch, President, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, and co-chaired by Frank W. Dawson, Assistant Secretary of Maryland’s Department of Natural Resources (DNR); Greenhouse Gas and Carbon Mitigation Working Group (MWG), chaired by George (Tad) Aburn, Director of MDE’s Air and Radiation Management Administration, and co-chaired by Malcolm Woolf, Director, Maryland Energy Administration (MEA); and Adaptation and Response Working Group (ARWG), chaired by John R.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Financial Report 2017 Contents
    Deutsche Bank Non-Financial Report 2017 Contents 3 About Deutsche Bank 3 CEO Letter 9 Approach to Sustainability 9 Business Environment and Stakeholder Engagement 12 Sustainability Ratings 12 Topics Covered in this Report 54 People and Society 15 Clients 54 People Strategy 15 Product Suitability and 64 Corporate Social Responsibility Appropriateness 69 Arts, Culture and Sports 17 Client Satisfaction 72 Environment 20 Complaint Management 72 In-house Ecology 22 Products and Services 78 About this Report 33 Digitization and Innovation 79 Supplementary Information 37 Conduct and Risk 79 Limited Assurance Report of the 37 Culture and Conduct Independent Auditor regarding the 40 Public Policy and Regulation seperate non-financial group report 41 Anti-Financial Crime 81 Limited Assurance Report of the 45 Environmental and Social Issues Independent Auditor 47 Human Rights 83 Abbreviations and Acronyms 49 Climate Risk 51 Information Security 85 Imprint 52 Data Protection 87 Back Cover Page About Deutsche Bank 3 CEO Letter 9 Approach to Sustainability 9 Business Environment and Stakeholder Engagement 12 Sustainability Ratings 12 Topics Covered in this Report Deutsche Bank About Deutsche Bank Non-Financial Report 2017 CEO Letter About Deutsche Bank Ladies and Gentlemen, CEO Letter When we announced our new strategic objectives in March, we declared unequivocally that we are still committed to our roots and underscored our intention to be a responsible corporate citizen. We therefore welcome the increasing importance of non-financial reporting. Our clients, particularly the institutions, are increasingly basing their investment decisions not only on financial criteria, but also on how these and other projects they support might impact the environment, people’s lives, and society.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Insurance Into Climate Risk Management
    INTEGRATING INSURANCE INTO CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT Conceptual Framework, Tools and Guiding Questions: Examples from the Agricultural Sector HOSTED BY Authors Gaby Ramm (Munich Climate Insurance Initiative − MCII advisory group member) Kehinde Balogun (Munich Climate Insurance Initiative − MCII) Matthias Range (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH − GIZ) Co-authors Maxime Souvignet (MCII) We thank our contributors for their • Olu Ajayi (Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation − CTA) strong partnership and dedication • Florent Baarsch ( International Fund for Agricultural Development – IFAD) to provide in-depth feedback as • Daniela Bohl (GIZ) Peer Reviewers to this document: • Toon Bullens (Microinsurance Association Netherlands − MIAN) • Emily Coleman (IFAD) • Massimo Giovanola (IFAD) • Michael Hamp (IFAD) • Rachael Hansen (MCII) • Jon Hellin (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center − CIMMYT) • Peter Hoeppe (MCII Chairman) • Vilma Hossini (Bundesanstalt Technisches Hilfswerk − THW) • Rhea Katsanakis (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction − UNISDR) • Nina Koeksalan (Food and Agriculture Organization – FAO) • Soenke Kreft (MCII) • Thomas Loster (Munich Re Foundation) • Jennifer Phillips (MCII) • Sandra Schuster (GIZ) • Mia Thom (Centre for Financial Regulation and Inclusion − CENFRI) • Branko Wehnert (GIZ) • Sebastian Wiegele (GIZ) • Michael Zissener (MCII) • Sabrina Zwick (MCII) 2 Abstract Today, emerging new risks from climate change and increasing GmbH (GIZ) have
    [Show full text]
  • CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018
    CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 Page 1 CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 C0 Introduction Introduction (C0.1) Give a general description and introduction to your organization. Response options This is an open text question. MetLife, Inc. (NYSE: MET), through its subsidiaries and affiliates (“MetLife”), is one of the world’s leading financial services companies, providing insurance, annuities, employee benefits and asset management to help its individual and institutional customers navigate their changing world. Founded in 1868, MetLife has operations in more than 40 countries and holds leading market positions in the United States, Japan, Latin America, Asia, Europe and the Middle East. MetLife is providing the answers to this Questionnaire at the request of CDP. The statements contained herein do not constitute warranties, guarantees, obligations or commitments. Any forward-looking statements contained herein are based on present knowledge and circumstances, may turn out to be incorrect and are not guarantees of future performance. MetLife is not obligated to correct, revise or update information given in this Questionnaire. (C0.2) State the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. Response options Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table. 2017-01-01 - 2017-12-31 (C0.3) Select the countries for which you will be supplying data. Response options Please complete the following table: Page 2 Country Hong Kong Greece Select all that apply: India Hungary [Country drop-down list] Japan Ireland Brazil Malaysia Italy Chile Nepal Poland Argentina South Korea Portugal Australia Vietnam Romania Bangladesh Bulgaria Russia Colombia Cyprus Slovakia Ecuador Czech Republic Spain Mexico France Turkey United States of America China Oman Uruguay Ukraine Qatar Egypt United Kingdom Saudi Arabia Jordan Bahrain United Arab Emirates Kuwait Lebanon (C0.4) Select the currency used for all financial information disclosed throughout your response.
    [Show full text]
  • What Can England Learn from the Long-Term Care System in Germany?
    Research report September 2019 What can England learn from the long-term care system in Germany? Natasha Curry, Laura Schlepper and Nina Hemmings About this report The current social care system in England is widely regarded as unfair, complex, confusing and failing to meet growing care needs in the population. But despite a series of reviews, commissions, reports and inquiries, and increasingly urgent calls for reform, change to this system remains elusive. Germany introduced its current social (or ‘long-term’) care system in 1995 in response to the challenges of ageing and rising costs of care. The system was developed at a time of significant economic and political upheaval in the wake of reunification. This report seeks to assess the German long-term care system through the lens of the policy challenges that face us in England. Using a literature review and a series of interviews with experts on the German system both within and outside Germany, we have sought to draw out elements of the German system that could either be incorporated into our thinking or that offer us cautionary tales. While the context may vary, we face common demographic and social challenges. As such, this report is intended not as a critique of the German system, nor as a comparative piece, but as a contribution to the discussions that we hope will ensue in the coming months. Acknowledgements We are grateful to the individuals who agreed to take part as interviewees, including those who met with us in person in Berlin and were very generous with their time and knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • California Climate Risk: Insurance-Based Approaches to Mitigation and Resilience
    California Climate Risk: Insurance-Based Approaches to Mitigation and Resilience July 23, 2019 UCLA School of Law Welcome California Climate Risk: Insurance-Based Approaches to Mitigation and Resilience July 23, 2019 | UCLA School of Law Keynote Address: California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara California Climate Risk: Insurance-Based Approaches to Mitigation and Resilience July 23, 2019 | UCLA School of Law Panel 1: Physical Risk Assessment, Impact Mitigation, and Insurance • Alex Hall, UCLA Center for Climate Science • Alice Hill, Hoover Institution • Kristen Torres Pawling, County of Los Angeles • LeRoy Westerling, UC Merced School of Engineering Moderator: Sean Hecht, UCLA School of Law California Climate Risk: Insurance-Based Approaches to Mitigation and Resilience July 23, 2019 | UCLA School of Law Break California Climate Risk: Insurance-Based Approaches to Mitigation and Resilience July 23, 2019 | UCLA School of Law Panel 2: Nature-based Solutions • Secretary of Ecology and Environment Alfredo Arellano, State of Quintana Roo, Mexico • David BurtonPerry, Swiss Re • Deborah Halberstadt, UC Davis Coastal and Marine Sciences Institute • Raghuveer Vinukollu, Munich Re Moderator: Louis Blumberg, Blumberg West Consulting California Climate Risk: Insurance-Based Approaches to Mitigation and Resilience July 23, 2019 | UCLA School of Law Parametric Insurance Policy to Cover Beaches Recovery and Coral Reefs Quintana Roo, México California Climate Risk: Insurance-Based Approaches to Mitigation and Resilience Panel 2: Nature-based Solutions July, 23, 2019 Alfredo Arellano Guillermo Ministry of Environment State Government of Quintana Roo, México [email protected] Beach Erosion 2010 Playa del Carmen 2017 Hotel Porto Real Coastline 2010 Coastline 2017 Coral Reefs on Risk Coral Reefs are affected by: • Diseases • Water Pollution • Bleaching • Recreational activities • Hurricanes: Experts consider that hurricanes category 4 and 5 passing less than 65 km from the reefs are very likely to damage it (Alvarez-Filipp, et.al.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration, Sustainability and a Marshall Plan with Africa
    Special Edition Migration, Sustainability and a Marshall Plan with Africa A Memorandum for the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the Governments of the EU Member States Bert Beyers Joachim von Braun Estelle Herlyn Klaus Leisinger Graeme Maxton Franz Josef Radermacher Thomas Straubhaar Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker Coordination Franz Josef Radermacher and the project team of FAW/n employees and the University of Ulm Download The document "Migration, Sustainability and a Marshall Plan with Africa – A Memorandum for the Federal Gov- ernment", a short version, and the associated material are available as PDF files at http://www.faw-neu-ulm.de http://www.senat-deutschland.de/, http://www.senatsinstitut.de/, http://www.clubofrome.de/ and http://www.clubofrome.org/. Picture credits title page • Evening, Djemaa El Fna square, Marrakech, Morocco - © Pavliha http://www.istockphoto.com/de/foto/abend-djemaa-el-fna-platz-marrakesch-marokko-gm499468399- 42845306?st=_p_pavliha%20El%20Fna • Photovoltaic Micro-plants by Isofoton (Morocco) by Isofoton.es (Creative Commons) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Isofoton_Marruecos.JPG • Panorama of Cairo. Taken from Cairo Citadel by kallerna (Creative Commons) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:View_over_Cairo_from_Citadel.jpg Table of Contents Editorial .................................................................................................... 3 Summary and orientation ............................................................................ 9 I. Mare Nostrum – The history
    [Show full text]
  • Originalarbeiten (Peer-Reviewed)
    Publikationsverzeichnis Prof. Reinhard W. Holl Originalarbeiten (Peer-reviewed) 527) Hoyer-Kuhn H, Huebner A, Richter-Unruh A, Bettendorf M, Rohrer T, Kapelari K, Riedl S, Mohnike K, Dörr HG, Roehl FW, Fink K, Holl RW, Woelfle JHydrocortisone dosing in children with Classic Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia – Results of the German/Austrian Registry In press, Endocrine Connection 2021 [IF: 2.592] 526) Sherr J, Schwandt A, Phelan H, Clements M, Holl RW, Benitez-Aguirre PZ, Miller KM, Wölfle J, Dover T, Maahs DM, Fröhlich-Reiterer E, Craig ME Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Trajectories of Youth with Type 1 Diabetes Over 10 Years Post-Diagnosis from Three Continents In Press, Pediatrics [IF: 5.417] 525) Kamrath C, Rosenbauer J, Tittel S, Warncke K, Hirtz R, Denzer C, Dost A, Neu A, Pacaud D, Holl RW Frequency of Autoantibody negative Type 1 Diabetes in Children, Adolescents, and young Adults during the first wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany In Press, Diabetes Care 2021 [IF: 16.019] XXX) van Mark G, Tittel SR, Welp R, Gloyer J, Sziegoleit S, Barion R, Jehle PM, Erath D, Bramlage P, Lanzinger S. The DIVE/DPV registries: Benefits and risks of analogue insulin use in individuals 75 years and older with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Im Druck BMC Open Diabetes 2021. [IF: 3.742] 524) Müller-Godeffroy E*, Mönkemöller K*, Lilienthal E, Heidtmann B, Becker M, Feldhahn L, Freff M, Hilgard D, Krone B, Papsch M, Schumacher A, Schwab KO, Schweiger H, Wolf J, Bollow E, Holl RW Zusammenhang von Bildungsstatus und Diabetesoutcomes: Ergebnisse der DIAS-Studie bei
    [Show full text]
  • Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures
    Implementing the Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures June 2017 June 2017 Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure i Contents A Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Background ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Structure of Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 2 3. Application of Recommendations .............................................................................................................................. 3 4. Assessing Financial Impacts of Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities ............................................................ 4 B Recommendations ....................................................................................................................................... 11 C Guidance for All Sectors .............................................................................................................................. 14 1. Governance ................................................................................................................................................................. 14 2. Strategy .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Insurance Can Support Climate Resilience Swenja Surminski, Laurens M
    opinion & comment COMMENTARY: How insurance can support climate resilience Swenja Surminski, Laurens M. Bouwer and Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer Insurance is gaining importance in and beyond the climate negotiations and offers many opportunities to improve climate risk management in developing countries. However, some caution is needed, if current momentum is to lead to genuine progress in making the most vulnerable more resilient to climate change. as 2015 ‘the year of climate of governments and individuals across value for money. Some critics point out insurance’? Statements emerging the world. that traditional insurance is an expensive Wfrom the G7 leaders and COP21 mechanism with high transaction and in Paris certainly suggest so. Article 8 of the … but some scepticism remains capital costs, making premiums far higher Paris Agreement includes “Risk insurance Any new insurance scheme in developing than expected losses. This suggests that facilities, climate risk pooling and other countries needs to overcome difficult adaptation funds might be better spent on insurance solutions” as areas of action1. challenges, including lack of risk data, other types of safety net rather than on Earlier in the year, at their summit in limited financial literacy, and weak financial buying insurance cover from international Germany, the leaders of the G7 launched a infrastructure; it also needs high levels of insurance markets8. new Initiative on Climate Risk Insurance support to make it viable for people with Critics further caution that subsidized (InsurResilience), pledging to bring very low income. Many of the new pilots insurance can dampen incentives to reduce climate insurance to 400 million currently and pools have been designed with this risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 IPCC SRCCL
    First Order Draft Chapter 7 IPCC SRCCL 1 Chapter 7: Risk management and Decision Making in Relation 2 to Sustainable Development 3 4 Coordinating Lead Authors: Margot Hurlbert (Canada), Jagdish Krishnaswamy (India) 5 Lead Authors: Edouard Davin (France), Francis Johnson (Sweden), Carlos Fernando Mena 6 (Ecuador), John Morton (United Kingdom), Soojeong Myeong (Republic of Korea), David Viner 7 (United Kingdom), Koko Warner (United States of America), Anita Wreford (New Zealand), Sumaya 8 Zakieldeen (Sudan), Zinta Zommers (Latvia) 9 Contributing Authors: Rocio Diaz-Chavez (Mexico), Minal Pathak (India), Darshini Mahadevia 10 (India), Charlotte Strick (Germany) 11 Review Editors: Regina Rodrigues (Brazil), B.L. Turner II (United States of America) 12 Chapter Scientist: Thobekile Zikhali (Zimbabwe) 13 Date of Draft: 08/06/2018 14 15 Do Not Cite, Quote or Distribute 7-1 Total pages: 135 First Order Draft Chapter 7 IPCC SRCCL 1 Table of Contents 2 Chapter 7: Risk management and Decision Making in Relation to Sustainable Development ..... 7-1 3 7.1 Executive summary .............................................................................................................. 7-4 4 7.2 Introduction and Relation to Other Chapters ....................................................................... 7-7 5 7.2.1 Findings of Previous IPCC Assessments and Reports and Gaps ................................. 7-7 6 7.2.2 Emergent, Emerging, and Key Risks ........................................................................... 7-8 7 7.3 Characterising
    [Show full text]
  • Better Understanding Insurance Mechanism in Dealing with Climate Change Risk, with Special Reference to China
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Commentary Better Understanding Insurance Mechanism in Dealing with Climate Change Risk, with Special Reference to China Feng Kong 1,2,* and Shao Sun 3,* 1 College of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China 2 Center for Crisis Management Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 3 National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (F.K.); [email protected] (S.S.) Abstract: Climate change risk has become an important challenge for global sustainable development. The insurance industry can play an important role in coping with the increasingly severe climate change risk. This paper first describes the increasing climate change risk and the difficulties of the insurance mechanism in dealing with it. Then this paper summarizes the international practice of using the insurance mechanism to deal with climate change risk from ten different aspects. Based on the summary of the role of the insurance mechanism in dealing with this risk in developing countries, this paper puts forward the main application areas for climate change risk insurance and discusses the policy implications of developing climate change risk insurance in China. Keywords: global climate change; coping with climate change risk; insurance mechanism; compre- hensive disaster risk prevention; China Citation: Kong, F.; Sun, S. Better Understanding Insurance Mechanism in Dealing with Climate Change Risk, 1. Introduction with Special Reference to China. Int. J. Global climate change has become one of the most serious challenges facing human Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, society [1–3], causing frequent natural disasters such as temperature rise, sea level rise, 2996.
    [Show full text]