DOCSLIB.ORG

2005 Fruit and Vegetable Crops Research Report Edited by Brent Rowell, John Snyder, and Chris Smigell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2005 Fruit and Vegetable Crops Research Report Edited by Brent Rowell, John Snyder, and Chris Smigell 2005 Fruit and Vegetable Crops Research Report Edited by Brent Rowell, John Snyder, and Chris Smigell Faculty, Staff , Students, and Grower Cooperators Jeff Porter, Henderson County Horticulture Farm (Horticulture) Acknowledgment Horticulture Student Workers Mark Reese, Scott County Ben Abell Chris Rivera, Caldwell County Grants from the Agricultural Faculty (Family & Consumer Services) Development Board through David Asher Tom Cottrell Daniel Bastin Glenn Roberts, Wayne County the Kentucky Horticulture Glenn Williams, Laurel County Council have allowed an Rick Durham Martin Crowley Terry Jones Chris Fuehr Beth Wilson, Pulaski County expansion of the fi eld research John Wilson, Madison County and demonstration program S. Kaan Kurtural Scott Pfeiff er to meet the informational Joseph Masabni Keiff er Shuler and educational needs of our Brent Rowell Neal Watts Kentucky State University growing vegetable and fruit John Snyder David Wayne industries. John Strang Erin Yost Faculty Mark Williams George F. Antonious (Dept. of Important note to readers Area Extension Associates Entomology Plant and Soil Sciences) Tejinder S. Kochhar (Dept. of The majority of research Joe Williams, Pennyrile, western Faculty Biology) Kentucky (vegetables and reports in this volume do Ric Bessin not include treatments with fruits) experimental pesticides. It Nathan Howard, Green River, Berea College should be understood that any northwestern Kentucky Plant Pathology experimental pesticide must (vegetables) Faculty fi rst be labeled for the crop Nathan Howell, Mammoth Faculty Sean Clark (Agriculture & Natural in question before it can be Cave, south-central Kentucky Resources Department) (vegetables) John Hartman used by growers, regardless Christopher Schardl of how it might have been Amanda Ferguson Sears, eastern Kentucky (vegetables) Kenny Seebold Grower/Cooperators used in research trials. The Paul Vincelli most recent product label is Bonnie Sigmon, Laurel and surrounding counties, Andre Barbour the fi nal authority concerning Professional Staff application rates, precautions, southeastern Kentucky Brent Bennett harvest intervals, and other (vegetables) Paul Bachi Kevin Bland relevant information. Contact Chris Smigell, Bluegrass, central Julie Beale Glenn Calebs your county’s Cooperative Kentucky (small fruits) Ed Dixon John Coots Extension Service if you need Dave Spalding, Bluegrass, Minos Cox assistance in interpreting central Kentucky (vegetables) Graduate Student Tony Donathin pesticide labels. Nicki Mundell Colby and Wayne Dorroh Horticulture Farm Manager Garry and Barry Eblen This is a progress report and may Darrell Slone Dan Flanagan not refl ect exactly the fi nal outcome Agricultural Economics Rick Gardner of ongoing projects. Please do not Horticulture Farms Staff Teresa, Herb, and Sandra reproduce project reports for distribution and Technical Staff Faculty Giandrea without permission of the authors. Tim Woods Jackie Gray Katie Bale David Hundley Sherri Dutton Mention or display of a trademark, Professional Staff Max Kinsett proprietary product, or fi rm in text Courtney Hart Loyal Land or fi gures does not constitute an Philip Ray Hays Matt Ernst Doug Martin endorsement and does not imply June Johnston Roland McIntosh approval to the exclusion of other Dave Lowry Extension Agents for Perry McLimore suitable products or fi rms. Janet Pfeiff er Carol Sigmon Kirk Ranta Agriculture and Horticulture Ted Walker Hilda Rogers Carroll Whitfi ll April Satanek Shane Bogle, Caldwell County Joel Wilson Bonka Vaneva Chris Clark, Hart County Dwight Wolfe Harold Eli, Christian County Susan Fox, Lyon County Other Collaborators Graduate Students Gary Hamilton, Bath County Audrey Horrall Pat Hardesty, Taylor County Imed E. Dami, The Ohio State Derek Law Clint Hardy, Daviess County University Brandon O’Daniel Annette Meyer Heisdorff er, Dena C. Fiacchino, Cornell Katie Russell Daviess County (Horticulture) University Cooperative Carol Hinton, Breckinridge Extension International Student County Michael Cavigelli, USDA Interns (Thailand) Mike Keen, Henderson County Robert L. Jarret, USDA/ARS (Horticulture) Wutthiphan Dadkunthot Ricky Miller, Breckinridge County Chinnakorn Thaophim (KSU Small-Farm Assistant) Tom Mills, Rockcastle County Contents Introduction UK Fruit and Vegetable Program Overview.....................................................................................................................5 Getting the Most Out of Research Reports .....................................................................................................................6 Produce Marketing Intentions Survey—Direct Marketing Continues to Grow ................................................9 Price Trends for Selected Kentucky Vegetable Crops from Diff erent Market Channels in 2004 and 2005 .................................................................................................................................... 11 Demonstrations On-Farm Commercial Vegetable Demonstrations in Central Kentucky ...........................................................14 On-Farm Commercial Vegetable Demonstrations in South-Central Kentucky with Observations on Seedless Mini-Watermelon Production ............................................................................................................ 15 On-Farm Commercial Vegetable Demonstrations in Southeastern Kentucky ............................................... 17 On-Farm Vegetable Demonstrations in Northwestern Kentucky ........................................................................ 18 On-Farm Commercial Vegetable Demonstrations in Western Kentucky .........................................................20 Grapes and Wine Enology Extension Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 22 Mapping Grape Growing Regions for Kentucky ......................................................................................................... 22 2000 Wine Grape Cultivar Trial ......................................................................................................................................... 24 Evaluation of Eastern European Wine Grape Cultivars for Kentucky ................................................................. 25 Vinifera Grape Training Trial .............................................................................................................................................. 31 Fall Weed Control in Grapes ............................................................................................................................................... 32 Weed Control in Non-Bearing Grapes ........................................................................................................................... 33 Phylogenetic Analysis of Kentucky Strains of Xylella fastidiosa, Cause of Grape Pierce’s Disease ............ 34 Small Fruits Establishment Costs for Sustainable Blueberry Production .................................................................................... 36 Blueberry Cultivar Trial for Eastern Kentucky ............................................................................................................ 37 Survival of Blueberry Cultivars in Western Kentucky ............................................................................................... 39 Evaluation of Th ornless Semi-Erect and Erect Blackberry Varieties and Training Systems ........................40 Tree Fruits Rootstock and Interstem Eff ects on Pome Fruit Trees .............................................................................................. 42 Asian Pear, Apple, and Peach Variety Demonstrations ............................................................................................. 44 Fall Weed Control in Apples and Peaches ...................................................................................................................... 45 Vegetables Fall Broccoli Cultivar Trial, Northwestern Kentucky ................................................................................................. 48 Bell Pepper Evaluations for Yield and Quality in Eastern Kentucky ..................................................................... 49 Bell Pepper Cultivar Evaluations for Yield and Quality in Central Kentucky .................................................... 51 Eff ect of Transplant Size on Yields and Returns of Bell Peppers ........................................................................... 53 Field Observations on Jalapeño Pepper Cultivars in South-Central Kentucky ...............................................55 Weed Control in Bell Peppers ............................................................................................................................................. 56 Gourmet Potato Production Using Plasticulture ........................................................................................................ 57 Weed Control in No-Till Pumpkins ................................................................................................................................. 58 Evaluation of Fungicides and Cultivars for Management of Powdery Mildew on Yellow Squash ............60 Synergistic Sweet Corn Evaluations in Eastern Kentucky ....................................................................................... 63 Synergistic Sweet Corn Evaluations in Central Kentucky .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ISOLATION and IDENTIFICATION of Taphrina Caerulescens in Quercus Eduardii in AGUASCALIENTES, MEXICO
    ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF Taphrina caerulescens IN Quercus eduardii IN AGUASCALIENTES, MEXICO AISLAMIENTO E IDENTIFICACIÓN DE Taphrina caerulescens EN Quercus eduardii EN AGUASCALIENTES, MÉXICO Gregg Evans1, Onesimo Moreno-Rico2*, José J. Luna-Ruíz3, Joaquín Sosa-Ramírez3, Celeste E. Moreno-Manzano4 1Ciencias Biológicas, Centro de Ciencias Básicas (CCB), Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes (UAA), Avenida Universidad # 940, Colonia Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 20131, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, México ([email protected]). 2Departamento de Microbiología, CCB, UAA, Avenida Universidad # 940, Ciudad Universitaria C.P. 20131, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, México ([email protected]). 3Departamento de Disciplinas Agrícolas, Centro de Ciencias Agropecuarias, UAA, Jesús María, Aguascalientes. ([email protected]), ([email protected]). 4CBTA 61, Aquiles Elorduy Garcia, Calvillo, Aguascalientes, México ([email protected]). ABSTRACT RESUMEN Taphrina caerulescens exclusively affects plants of the Quercus Taphrina caerulescens afecta exclusivamente a las plantas del gé- genus. The identification and isolation of this fungus is difficult nero Quercus. La identificación y el aislamiento de este hongo due to its dimorphic nature and extremely slow growth habit es difícil debido a su naturaleza dimórfica y su hábito de cre- in artificial growth media. The objective of this research was to cimiento extremadamente lento en los medios de crecimiento isolate and identify the fungal pathogen T. caerulescens. Three artificial. El objetivo de esta investigación fue aislar e identificar methods were used to isolate the fungus, however, only the spore el patógeno fúngico T. caerulescens. Tres métodos se usaron para fall method was successful. In order to identify the fungus, a aislar el hongo; sin embargo, solo el método de caída de esporas visual inspection of the host plants infected leaves was carried fue exitoso.
    [Show full text]
  • A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study of the Infection of Water Oak (Quercus Nigra) by Taphrina Caerulescens
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by SFA ScholarWorks Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Faculty Publications Biology 2000 A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study of the Infection of Water Oak (Quercus nigra) by Taphrina Caerulescens Josephine Taylor Stephen F Austin State University, Department of Biology, [email protected] Dale O. Birdwell Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/biology Part of the Biology Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation Taylor, Josephine and Birdwell, Dale O., "A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study of the Infection of Water Oak (Quercus nigra) by Taphrina Caerulescens" (2000). Faculty Publications. Paper 88. http://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/biology/88 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mycological Society of America A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study of the Infection of Water Oak (Quercus nigra) by Taphrina caerulescens Author(s): Josephine Taylor and Dale O. Birdwell Source: Mycologia, Vol. 92, No. 2 (Mar. - Apr., 2000), pp. 309-311 Published by: Mycological Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3761566 Accessed: 07-10-2015 16:18 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenolic Compounds As Markers of Wine Quality and Authenticity
    foods Review Phenolic Compounds as Markers of Wine Quality and Authenticity Vakare˙ Merkyte˙ 1,2 , Edoardo Longo 1,2,* , Giulia Windisch 1,2 and Emanuele Boselli 1,2 1 Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy; [email protected] (V.M.); [email protected] (G.W.); [email protected] (E.B.) 2 Oenolab, NOI Techpark South Tyrol, Via A. Volta 13B, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0471-017691 Received: 29 October 2020; Accepted: 28 November 2020; Published: 1 December 2020 Abstract: Targeted and untargeted determinations are being currently applied to different classes of natural phenolics to develop an integrated approach aimed at ensuring compliance to regulatory prescriptions related to specific quality parameters of wine production. The regulations are particularly severe for wine and include various aspects of the viticulture practices and winemaking techniques. Nevertheless, the use of phenolic profiles for quality control is still fragmented and incomplete, even if they are a promising tool for quality evaluation. Only a few methods have been already validated and widely applied, and an integrated approach is in fact still missing because of the complex dependence of the chemical profile of wine on many viticultural and enological factors, which have not been clarified yet. For example, there is a lack of studies about the phenolic composition in relation to the wine authenticity of white and especially rosé wines. This review is a bibliographic account on the approaches based on phenolic species that have been developed for the evaluation of wine quality and frauds, from the grape varieties (of V.
    [Show full text]
  • Peach Leaf Curl
    Dr. Yonghao Li Department of Plant Pathology and Ecology The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station 123 Huntington Street, P. O. Box 1106 New Haven, CT 06504 Phone: (203) 974-8601 Fax: (203) 974-8502 Founded in 1875 Email: [email protected] Putting science to work for society Website: www.ct.gov/caes PEACH LEAF CURL Peach leaf curl is a world-wide disease and noticeable even at a distance. As infection one of most common diseases in commercial progresses, abnormal multiplication of plant and residential orchards in Connecticut. This cells at the margin of infected leaves results in disease attacks peach, nectarine, and related puckered and thickened appearance (Figure ornamental species and causes early 2). In moist conditions, gray or white powdery defoliation when the weather is conducive appearance may be seen on the surface of with periods of rains and high humidity in distorted leaves as a result of the production early spring. Severe early defoliation can of fungal spores (Figure 2). Diseased leaves weaken tree vitality, and the weakened tree is turn yellow or brown and drop in the early more susceptible to winter injury and growth stages. Fruit and twigs rarely get opportunistic diseases. The disease is infected. When they are infected, fruits tend potentially devastating to both crop yield and to drop early and twigs are swollen and tree longevity. stunted. SYMPTOMS AND DIAGNOSTICS DISEASE CYCLE AND DEVELOPMENT Peach leaf curl mainly attack leaves. The Peach leaf curl is caused by a fungus, initial symptom is distorted leaves with red or Taphrina deformans. The fungus forms two pink coloration (Figure 1), which is very types of spores, ascospore and blastospore, in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Mesoscale Impact of Climatic Change for Quebec's Winegrowing Bioclimatology
    Open Geospatial Viticulture: Determining the Mesoscale Impact of Climatic Change for Quebec©s Winegrowing Bioclimatology Trevor James Smith A thesis In the Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Magisteriate in Science (Geography, Urban, and Environmental Studies) Concordia University Montréal, Québec Canada 24 February 2017 © 2017, Trevor James Smith, Some Rights Reserved Creative Commons 4.0 International BY-NC License (see Annex 6) CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared by Trevor James Smith Entitled Open Geospatial Viticulture: Determining the Mesoscale Impact of Climatic Change for Quebec©s Winegrowing Bioclimatology and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Magisteriate in Science (Geography, Urban, and Environmental Studies) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final Examining Committee: ____________________________________________________ Chair Dr. Norma Rantisi _________________________________________________Examiner Dr. Norman K. Jones _________________________________________________Examiner Dr. Philippe Roy ________________________________________________Supervisor Dr. H. Damon Matthews Approved by ___________________________________________ Chair of Department ___________________________________________ Dean of Faculty of Arts and Science On ___________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Canada Province-Level Wine Landscapes
    WINE INTELLIGENCE CANADA PROVINCE-LEVEL WINE LANDSCAPES 2020 FEBRUARY 2020 1 Copyright © Wine Intelligence 2020 • All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means) without the permission of the copyright owners. Application for permission should be addressed to Wine Intelligence. • The source of all information in this publication is Wine Intelligence unless otherwise stated. • Wine Intelligence shall not be liable for any damages (including without limitation, damages for loss of business or loss of profits) arising in contract, tort or otherwise from this publication or any information contained in it, or from any action or decision taken as a result of reading this publication. • Please refer to the Wine Intelligence Terms and Conditions for Syndicated Research Reports for details about the licensing of this report, and the use to which it can be put by licencees. • Wine Intelligence Ltd: 109 Maltings Place, 169 Tower Bridge Road, London SE1 3LJ Tel: 020 73781277. E-mail: [email protected]. Registered in England as a limited company number: 4375306 2 CONTENTS ▪ How to read this report p. 5 ▪ Management summary p. 7 ▪ Wine market provinces: key differences p. 21 ▪ Ontario p. 32 ▪ Alberta p. 42 ▪ British Colombia p. 52 ▪ Québec p. 62 ▪ Manitoba p. 72 ▪ Nova Scotia p. 82 ▪ Appendix p. 92 ▪ Methodology p. 100 3 CONTENTS ▪ How to read this report p. 5 ▪ Management summary p. 7 ▪ Wine market provinces: key differences p. 21 ▪ Ontario p. 32 ▪ Alberta p. 42 ▪ British Colombia p. 52 ▪ Québec p.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Spray Guide Contents Foreword
    2 014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Arkansas Spray Guide University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service AG1281 Illinois University of Illinois Extension ICSG3-14 Indiana Purdue Extension ID-169 Iowa Iowa State University Extension and Outreach PM 1375 Kansas K-State Research and Extension Kentucky University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service ID-94 Missouri University of Missouri Missouri State University MX377 Nebraska University of Nebraska — Lincoln Extension Ohio Ohio State University Extension 506B2 Oklahoma Oklahoma State University Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service E-987 West Virginia West Virginia University Extension Service Publication 865 Wisconsin University of Wisconsin-Extension A3899 2014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Spray Guide Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................6 Tips on Using This Spray Guide .................................................................................................13 Grape Spray Schedule .................................................................................................................15 Blueberry Spray Schedule ...........................................................................................................37 Raspberry and Blackberry Spray Schedule .................................................................................42 Strawberry Spray Schedule .........................................................................................................49
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Characteristics of Wine Made by Disease Tolerant Varieties
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI UDINE in agreement with FONDAZIONE EDMUND MACH PhD School in Agricultural Science and Biotechnology Cycle XXX Doctoral Thesis Chemical characteristics of wine made by disease tolerant varieties PhD Candidate Supervisor Silvia Ruocco Dr. Urska Vrhovsek Co-Supervisor Prof. Doris Rauhut DEFENCE YEAR 2018 To the best gift that life gave us: to you Nonna Rosa CONTENTS Abstract 1 Aim of the PhD project 2 Chapter 1 Introduction 3 Preface to Chapter 2 17 Chapter 2 The metabolomic profile of red non-V. vinifera genotypes 19 Preface to Chapter 3 and 4 50 Chapter 3 Study of the composition of grape from disease tolerant varieties 56 Chapter 4 Investigation of volatile and non-volatile compounds of wine 79 produced by disease tolerant varieties Concluding remarks 140 Summary of PhD experiences 141 Acknowledgements 142 Abstract Vitis vinifera L. is the most widely cultivated Vitis species around the world which includes a great number of cultivars. Owing to the superior quality of their grapes, these cultivars were long considered the only suitable for the production of high quality wines. However, the lack of resistance genes to fungal diseases like powdery and downy mildew (Uncinula necator and Plasmopara viticola) makes it necessary the application of huge amounts of chemical products in vineyard. Thus, the search for alternative and more sustainable methods to control the major grapevine pathogens have increased the interest in new disease tolerant varieties. Chemical characterisation of these varieties is an important prerequisite to evaluate and promote their use on the global wine market. The aim of this project was to produce a comprehensive study of some promising new disease tolerant varieties recently introduced to the cultivation by identifying the peculiar aspects of their composition and measuring their positive and negative quality traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Wine Grape Variety Trial for Maritime Western Washington 2000-2008
    Summary of Results: Wine Grape Variety Trial for Maritime Western Washington 2000-2008 Wine Grape Cultivar Trials 2000-2008 in the Cool Maritime Climate of Western WA Gary Moulton, Carol Miles, Jacqueline King, and Charla Echlin WSU Mount Vernon NWREC 16650 State Route 536, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Tel. 360-848-6150 Email [email protected] http://extension.wsu.edu/maritimefruit/Pages/default.aspx Wines produced from grapes grown in cool climate regions have generally low alcohol content, low viscosity, and high fruit aromas and flavor (Casteel, 1992; Jackson and Schuster, 1977; Zoecklein, 1998). Certain varietals from Germany, Austria Russia, Hungary, and Armenia, as well as some common French varieties such as Pinot Noir and Pinot Gris can produce excellent fruity wines in western Washington. Selection of the right clone is important and knowing the heat units of your site will greatly aid in the selection of which varieties to grow. The cool maritime region of western Washington is on the very low end of the spectrum with respect to the number of growing degree days (GDD) needed for ripening the more common wine grape cultivars. Although the Puget Sound region has a long growing season in terms of frost free days, mesoclimates within the area range from below 1200 GDD to 2200 GDD. The Washington State University Mount Vernon Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center (WSU Mount Vernon NWREC) research site is located at 12 feet above sea level in the Skagit Valley floodplain, 3 miles from the Puget Sound. Since 2002, annual GDD averaged 1693; in 2003 there was a spike in GDD of 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • 377 Final 2003/0140
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 24.6.2003 COM (2003) 377 final 2003/0140 (ACC) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion of an agreement between the European Community and Canada on trade in wines and spirit drinks (presented by the Commission) EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. This agreement between Canada and the European Community is the result of bilateral negotiations which took place from 7 November 2001 to 24 April 2003 on the basis of a negotiating mandate adopted by the Council on 1 August 2001 (Doc. 11170/01). The agreement comprises arrangements for the reciprocal trade in wines and spirit drinks with a view to creating favourable conditions for its harmonious development. 2. The agreement specifies oenological practices which may be used by producers of wine exported to the other Party, as well as a procedure for accepting new oenological practices. The Community's simplified system of certification will be applied to imported wines originating in Canada. Canada will not introduce import certification for Community wines and will simplify the extent of such testing requirements as are currently applied by provinces, within a year of entry into force. Production standards are agreed for wine made from grapes frozen on the vine. Concerning production standards for spirit drinks, the agreement provides that Canada will adhere to Community standards for its exports of whisky to the Community. 3. Procedures whereby geographical indications relating to wines and spirit drinks of either Party may be protected in the territory of the other Party are agreed. The current "generic" status in Canada of 21 wine names will be ended by the following dates: 31 December 2013 for Chablis, Champagne, Port and Porto, and Sherry; 31 December 2008 for Bourgogne and Burgundy, Rhin and Rhine, and Sauterne and Sauternes; the date of entry into force of the agreement for Bordeaux, Chianti, Claret, Madeira, Malaga, Marsala, Medoc and Médoc, and Mosel and Moselle.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Června 2019
    2019 1. června 2019 1 Jako jediná společnost v ČR zastupuje nové PIWI odrůdy od Valentina Blattnera: Cabernet Jura CAL 6-04 Cabernet blanc Riesel VB 11-11-89-12 Pinotin Cabernet Noir Cabertin Degustace vín z těchto odrůd probíhá každoročně, počet míst je omezen, prosíme zájemce o rezervaci předem. Rybárová Petra tel.: 601 590 658 [email protected] www.vinofrukt.cz 2 Vážení návštěvníci, vítáme Vás na 6. ročníku PIWI 2019 - Soutěžní přehlídky interspecifických odrůd a Hibernal fora v Šardicích. Jsme potěšeni, že jste nás navštívili a zveme Vás k ochutnávce velice zajímavých vín. Je pro Vás připraveno 314 vzorků vín, z toho je 72 vzorků odrůdy Hibernal, 144 vzorků ostatních bílých odrůd, 82 vzorků červených vín a 16 vzorků růžových vín. Statistika vzorků vín dle kategorií a zemí původu: Stát Bílé Hibernal Růžové Červené Celkem ČR 68 59 28 155 Polsko 44 13 11 28 91 Rakousko 12 2 7 21 Slovensko 7 2 15 24 Německo 12 1 9 22 Itálie 1 1 celkem 144 72 16 82 314 Hodnocení vín proběhlo v pátek 24. 5. 2019 za účasti zkušených degustátorů stobodovým systémem, pod dohledem Prof. Ing. Pavla Pavlouška. Ph.D. Tím, že nejznámější a nejrozšířenější PIWI odrůdou je bezesporu odrůda Hibernal, byla v rámci popularizace této odrůdy samostatně hodnocena tato odrůda. Šampiony výstavy vybrali předsedové stolů pod vedením Prof. Ing. Pavla Pavlouška, Ph.D a vedoucích jednotlivých degustačních komisí. Titul CHAMPION PIWI 2019 v kategorii bílých vín odrůdy Hibernal získalo víno Hibernal 2017 z Vinařství Foretník, Šardice. Titul CHAMPION PIWI 2019 v kategorii bílých vín ostatních PIWI odrůd získalo víno Muscaris 2017 z vinařství Wohlgemuth Schnürr z Německa.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report on the Implementation of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA)
    Country Report on the implementation of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) ITALY 30/04/2019 First Report on Compliance of ITPGRFA Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic resources for Food and Agriculture Pursuant to Article 21 of the Treaty, the Governing Body approved, at its Fourth Session, the Compliance Procedures that include, among others, provisions on monitoring and reporting: Resolution 2/2011. According to the Compliance Procedures, each Contracting Party is to submit to the Compliance Committee, through the Secretary, a report on the measures it has taken to implement its obligations under the Treaty. This Reporting System facilitates the submission of such information. Should you need any additional information regarding the reporting on compliance or the Reporting System, please visit the Treaty’s website or contact the Secretariat at [email protected]. Additional Reporting Information Name and contact of the reporting officer Petra Engel Institution(s) of affiliation Council for Research in Agriculture and Economics Office for Institutional and International Cooperation Via Po, 14 00198 Rome, Italy http://www.crea.gov.it http://www.entecra.it email: [email protected] The report was finalized on 02/04/2019 International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Standard Voluntary Reporting Format Article 4: General obligations 1. Are there any laws, regulations, procedures or policies in place in your country that implement the Treaty? YES 1A. If your answer is ‘yes’, please provide details of such laws, regulations, procedures or policies: Italy ratified the Treaty on 29 April 2004, under Law n.
    [Show full text]